Col. Cassad’s site provides this note on terminology
cassad_eng- (Originally May 16th, 2014)
[O]nce more about the essence of the Kiev junta, which is something that some of us tend to deny. Let’s take the classic definition of fascism from Georgi Dimitrov, which was considered as the clearest definition of fascism from the point of view of the communist theory in the USSR.
- 1. As we can see, the opponents of the Kiev junta are openly terrorized, which includes physical extermination, intimidation, hostage-taking, warrantless arrests, abductions, torture, and other elements of terror. A small group of people that got into power by the way of a coup authorizes and supervises this terror. This dictatorship is narrowly reactionary and represents the most radical forms of the Ukrainian integral nationalism and fascism, which, as declarations made by Yarosh imply, do not hide their imperialist tendencies, primarily at the expense of the capitalist Russian Federation.
- 2. Ukraine is governed by the representatives of major financial capital. Billionaires run against millionaires for president. The most probable candidates are Poroshenko the billionaire and Tymoshenko the millionaire. The billionaire Kolomoisky is a major power in Ukraine. Billionaires Taruta and Akhmetov were sent to pacify the rebellion in Donbass. In other words, we can see a clear implementation of the government by the representatives of major financial capital. Isn’t Poroshenko a major financial capitalist? Isn’t Kolomoisky a major financial capitalist? Therefore, denying the essence of the key beneficiaries of the coup suggests either flagrant misunderstanding of the essence of capitalism or the desire to preserve the battered templates.
- 3. The government is implemented through both oppression of the unconscious masses of the proletariat and open terror against the part of the working class, intelligentsia, and petty bourgeoisie that openly spoke out against the fascist dictatorship and the monopoly of major capital in the government. The major capital becomes the regime itself and the fascist squads become its instruments for building the fascist system of government, which is built on a terrorist dictatorship.
- 4. It is not very difficult to recognize that the Ukrainian fascism cultivates hatred towards other peoples in its domestic and foreign policy – primarily towards the Russians, and towards the Poles to a lesser degree. There is also considerable antisemitism. Russophobia is actually the cornerstone in the ideology of the Kiev regime, which openly advocates oppressing and exterminating people based on their ethnicity, culture, and language.
So, as we can see, the situation in Ukraine is a 100% match for Dimitrov’s classical definition. This is exactly fascism, in its most classical and pure form.
Both Kiev’s fascism and Washington’s sponsorship created the war in the East.
[box type=”warning”] The war in Ukraine is the result of an armed insurgency against the fascist regime in Kiev and the regime’s subsequent attempts to suppress it.
Why “junta”? This word is used here to refer to the fascist regime in Kiev for historical reasons and because of our respect for the people of Donbass, who tend to use the Russian word “хунта”, which sounds exactly the same, to refer to the regime.While not a perfect match for the meaning of “junta” in English, the Kiev regime is sufficiently close to classical military juntas in its behavior to make using this word to refer to them appropriate from out point of view. If you don’t like the word, then you can simply replace all instances of “junta” with the word “regime”. [/box]
___________________________
P.S. The image in the header is the famous photo collage “Large Dimitrov, small Goering”. Original article: http://colonelcassad.livejourn
