Are We Giant Suckers? While the US Blows Money on the Military, Europe Spends Dough on Social Programs
By Joshua Holland, AlterNet
![RobertGates](https://www.greanvillepost.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/RobertGates.jpg)
Robert Gates: Served Bush and was naturally retained by Obama. Keeping reactionary leftovers from GOP administrations is common practice for the treacherous Democrats. Clinton did it big time, too.
Last week, during his final European visit before retiring, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates blasted our NATO allies for spending too little on their militaries.
“The blunt reality,” he told an audience in Brussels, “is that there will be dwindling appetite” in the U.S. “to expend increasingly precious funds on behalf of nations that are apparently unwilling to devote the necessary resources … to be serious and capable partners in their own defense.’’
ablaze with riots against its own “austerity” measures.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
PROMOTIONAL MESSAGE
A TOOL IS USELESS IF IT’S NOT USED. Don’t just sit there…introduce a friend or relative to The Greanville Post and help us expand the reach of progressive ideas—the requisite path to our nation’s liberation from the current nightmare. If each of you brings merely ONE additional reader to the table, we will be able to double our circulation.
___________________________________________________________________________________________
But interestingly, conservatives simultaneously argue that lavish U.S. military spending subsidizes Europe’s social welfare programs, andthat we’re the smarter party in this deal. Our kids get the wonderful opportunity to die in distant lands, while theirs are burdened with the horrors of decent retirement security and free health care.
Max Boot, a prominent and utterly pathological neoconservative, went so far as to lament that we, too, are spending too little on the military these days, writing, “It’s hard to remember now, but there was a time when the federal government spent most of its money on the armed forces. In 1962, the total federal budget was $106 billion of which $52 billion—almost half—went for defense. It wasn’t until 1976 that entitlement spending exceeded defense spending.”
What he doesn’t say is that the American Right has long opposed the kind of international security cooperation that might shift some of the cost of policing the world to other states. If we didn’t insist on doing it ourselves, perhaps we wouldn’t have to.
But I suppose that when Americans are waiting in line for food stamps—or waiting to pay their respects to a soldier who died in some godforsaken country thousands of miles away—they can take an abstract pride in being the world’s only superpower. The argument has always seemed to me like the biggest loser in Las Vegas saying that the house is a sucker.
So remember to take pride in American power, and remember that it comes at a very high price.
Drop him an email or follow him on Twitter.
______________________________________________________________
If you liked this article, why not support The Greanville Post by buying our T-shirt, a mug, a mousepad, or any other item now in our store? That way you donate a few dollars and also get a nice gift. It’s a win-win formula!
Created By CrankyBeagle for The Greanville Post
This and many other items at our store. Stop by today!