If this is the new normal, let me revel in my abnormalities…
Ultimately, Murphy’s patented brand of ju-jitsu is tiresome because it’s predictable. Murphy’s creative philosophy seems to revolve around the idea that nothing succeeds like excess, and maybe that’s true when it comes to deploying shocks on “American Horror Story.” But “The New Normal” needs to work in a more linear and emotionally direct fashion, and there’s not much about this NBC pilot, which is fueled by a mixture of cattiness and slick manipulation, that reassures me on that front.
When it became clear that the brittle, idiotic stereotypes of “2 Broke Girls” weren’t part of a passing phase, critics didn’t have a problem bashing that show, but a multi-camera sitcom on CBS may just offer a more tempting target. Also, in fairness, it took some time before it became clear that “2 Broke Girls” not only didn’t want to fix its problems, but didn’t think it had anything to fix. But I wonder how much of a pass “The New Normal” will get; it shouldn’t get much of one if it continues to display a certain kind of sanctimony while frequently being ungenerous and unkind.
We’ll have to see if “The New Normal” doubles down on its uncharitable impulses, but if past is prologue, we’re in for a lot of fat jokes and cruel asides about anyone who isn’t good-looking, well-to-do and white. Chances are a lot of the humor will continue to revolve around Nana’s (tee-hee!) naughty racism, Bryan’s judgmental pronouncements and the aw-shucks naivety of Goldie (what can you expect? She’s from Ohio!).
I get that “The New Normal’s” first duty is to be funny — and it is, at times — but, long-term, it needs viewers to invest in the lives of the central trio. We have to care about what they’re going through for some the humor and all of the pathos to land. But is the show truly interested in exploring emotions beyond token scenes that might as well be labeled, “Here are people having feelings now”? That remains to be seen.
Ryan McGee and I discussed “The New Normal,” “Guys With Kids” and “Sons of Anarchy” in this week’s Talking TV podcast, which is on iTunes and below.
I wanted to like it, for NeNe’s sake, but just didn’t. I agree with P Greanville. The show is neither funny nor clever.
What else is being produced by the drug crazed producers/writers of today’s stock of brainless, humorless and irritating, “comedy” shows? I include the “drug crazed” as an adjective to the ship of fools who pump out such stupidity like sausages, with the results that are just as ugly as the production of that fat filled entree. Years ago, one media mogul opined that the reason for the base, shock humor, that only elicited embarrassed chuckles, was due to the cocaine/pot riddled minds of the creators. One wonders what depths they can lower the public’s ethical ethos to. I am hardly… Read more »
“I fail to believe that the ever lowering of all aspects of entertainment does not produce effects that will have consequences the public would fear to contemplate…” This sentence resonates with me (among several passages in this comment which I find simply uncanny in their lucidity). Entertainment is perceived as a “throwaway” in this culture, or, perhaps in most cultures in history, but entertainment has the power not only to act as a salutary instrument for the psychic health of a community, but also to influence the way they perceive life itself. Like you I agree with the author that… Read more »
I apologize to the serious critics and analysts of this new show, but I don’t really see their point regarding TV prime time America. Most probably such an inspid show (it sounds to me) should be simply ignored and consequently removed. I personally support the struggle for full rights of gays and lesbians and though I have never seen the show described in the article and in the comments, and probably never will, I automatically reject the banalization of an issue that affects many millions of Americans. Yet, come to think of it, gay movements tend to be so engrossed… Read more »