TOO MUCH – Chronicles of Inequality (Sept. 16, 2013)

This approach once worked rather well, of course, for Ronald Reagan. But we live today in a far different world. More on this world in this week’s Too Much.

Join us on Facebook
or follow us on Twitter

“America’s income disparity has reached a level not seen since the ‘Roaring ’20s.’ Students of history will recall what happened next.”
Editorial, Peoria Star Journal, September 11, 2013

Like Too Much?
Email this issue
to a friend

Web Gem

Community-Wealth.Org/ An online clearinghouse for initiatives aiming to democratize asset and wealth ownership.

Americans make up just under a third of the world’s ultra wealthy, the newly released World Ultra Wealth Report noted last week. The 65,505 Americans worth at least $30 million hold a combined 2013 wealth of more than $9 trillion.

Randy Stearns has one such specialty: “home-tech integration.” Stearns helps people install and maintain high-tech gadgets. But we’re not talking “geek squad” and hooking up home networks here. We’re talking rich people — and electronic toys that can cost more than houses.

Randy Stearns offers “24/7 white glove” service for clients who typically pay between $150,000 and $450,000 per project. These affluents get plenty for their money. Call Randy and you, too, could end up with a home monitoring system that sends out alerts whenever your wine cellar temperature rises too high.

Annual sales in luxury home-tech integration, Stearns estimates, are going to nearly double — to $3.7 billion — by 2016. He may be underestimating his potential market. America’s rich, two top economists revealed last week, are actually getting richer faster than almost anyone thought possible.

Last year, report Emmanuel Saez from the University of California Berkeley and Thomas Piketty from the Paris School of Economics, the incomes of America’s top 1 percent — families that took home over $393,941 — shot up just under 20 percent over the year before. America’s really rich, families in the top 0.01 percent, saw their incomes soar by over 32 percent.

The just over 16,000 families that make up our top 0.01 percent finished up last year averaging $30,785,699 in income each.

And the rest of America? The incomes of the nation’s bottom 99 percent rose all of 1 percent last year. Since 2009, bottom 99 percent incomes have barely bumped up at all, just 0.4 percent on average, after taking inflation into account.

Emmanuel Saez has a stat that puts the matter even more starkly. America’s top 1 percent, he notes, has “captured 95 percent” of all income gains over the first three years of the recovery.  Overall, since 1993, top 1 percenters have grabbed “just over two-thirds” of total family income growth.

Like this article? Sign up
to receive the Too Much weekly in your email inbox.

This massive surge at the top has — no surprise — significantly hiked the share of national income that’s flowing into the pockets of America’s most comfortable.

For most of the middle of the 20th century, America’s most affluent 1 percent took in less than $1 of every $10 in national income. In some of these years, the top 1 percent share even dipped under 9 percent.

Those days now come across as almost mythic ancient history. In 2007, the year before the Great Recession hit, the share of the nation’s income the top 1 percent claimed hit 23.5 percent, or nearly $1 out of every $4.

This top 1 percent share did dip with the Great Recession, down to 18.1 percent in 2009. But the “recovery” — for the rich — has since then been almost total. Last year, the top 1 percent income share jumped back to 22.5 percent.

We have come, as a nation, almost full circle back to the deeply unequal America of the late 1920s. That America’s deep economic divides ushered in the Great Depression of the 1930s.

We finally ended the Great Depression, Berkeley’s Saez points out, by nurturing a set of institutions that narrowed the gaps between America’s wealthiest and everyone else.

The two most fundamental of these institutions: a vibrant labor movement that established new social norms about fair pay and a steeply progressive tax system that subjected the nation’s wealthy to tax rates that topped 90 percent on income over $400,000.

These two institutions have both withered over recent decades, and the Great Recession hasn’t yet done much to reverse that withering.

Recent equalizing policy changes — like the higher federal income tax rates on the rich that came in earlier this year — remain, notes Saez, “modest relative to the policy changes that took place coming out of the Great Depression.”

And this reality has insightful observers like the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Jay Bookman deeply worried. The nation’s most affluent 10 percent, Bookman notes, took in just a third of the nation’s income four decades ago. The top tenth last year, for the first time ever, took in over half the nation’s income dollars.

“Great concentrations of wealth” like this, Bookman wrote last week, “create great concentrations of political power and distort the terms of debate.”

How distorted has our debate become? Our lawmakers, observes Bookman, now see no problem cutting food stamps at the same time they refuse to raise taxes higher on America’s ever-richer rich “because that wouldn’t be fair.”

The bright side? In an America growing more unequal, people like Randy Stearns won’t have any trouble finding clients.

Dean Baker, Government Policy Gave Us Inequality, Not the Market, Center for Economic and Policy Research, September 11, 2013. We have it within us to reverse the trends that have concentrated America’s income and wealth.

Joseph Stiglitz, The People Who Break the Rules Have Raked in Huge Profits and Wealth and It’s Sickening Our Politics, AlterNet, September 11, 2013. A Nobel Prize-winning economist at last week’s AFL-CIO convention.

James Saft, Lehman’s legacy of inequality, Reuters, September 12, 2013. On financialization, giving “incentives to the talented to do perverse things with our money and keep too much of it for themselves.”

David Brodwin, Suffering Under the Weight of Inequality, US News & World Report, September 12, 2013. A business leader explores the three ways inequality dampens healthy economic growth.

Paul Krugman, Rich Man’s Recovery, New York Times, September 13, 2013. Hoping that last week’s New York mayoral primary will be “the leading edge of a new economic populism.”

Jeff Faux, Larry Summers and the Economists’ ‘Greed Exception,’ American Prospect, September 12, 2013. Why do we assume those who study money cannot be corrupted by it?

Check this review of the best new book on the triumph over America’s original plutocracy

The World Ultra Wealth Report

This latest scorecard comes from the Singapore-based research group Wealth-X and the Swiss banking giant UBS. What makes this scorecard stand out a bit from the crowd? A laser-like focus on the global “ultra wealthy,” those individuals worth at least $30 million.

Researchers from Wealth-X and UBS have counted 199,235 of these fortunate souls, a new world’s record. Their combined wealth: $28 trillion, up $2 trillion from last year. The average wealth for one of these ultras: $139 million.

But this average overstates the median — most typical — ultra fortune. The world of the ultra wealthy turns out to be as top-heavy as the rest of the world.

The world’s more than 2,000 billionaires, notes this new World Ultra Wealth Report, make up just 1 percent of the world super-rich population. But this 1 percent holds 23 percent of the world’s ultra wealthy net worth.