Capitalism Doesn’t Add Up & Other Somber But Needed Conclusions


Capitalism is riddled with contradictions and is grounded in the totally irrational idea, that widespread selfishness will yield a good society.  



ERIC SCHECHTER: ERIC’S RANTS & VIDEOS

(Read the essay, or watch the 8 minute video version above in this little box.)

[W]hen I retired from teaching college math, I began to apply my reasoning skills to politics and economics. And I’ve found that the world around us is entirely different from what we’ve been told. In particular, capitalism is all wrong. If it were a calculus exam, I’d mark a big red “F” across its front page.

The crucial math skill in this instance is not numerical computation, but simply the training to notice when someone makes unwarranted assumptions. The terrible current state of the world economy stems from erroneous assumptions about human nature that mainstream economists make at the beginning of their reasoning, before they ever get to their numerical computations. And many other people in our society are also unaware of their own assumptions about economics, politics, and human nature.

noamchomsky

We’ve been misdirected away from the truth by a culture that, as Chomsky has said, encourages a lively debate within a narrow spectrum of views. For instance, as I write this, the corporate news is again filled by the perennial argument between deficit hawks and Keynesians:

  • The deficit hawks say the interest on the national debt is growing to a crushing size. They advocate reining in the debt by cutting back on government spending.
  • The Keynesians advocate increased government spending, to stimulate employment and get us out of recession, after which we can start paying down the debt.

Neither side mentions the broader issues:

musical-chairs
First, the debt can never be paid off. It’s like the game of Musical Chairs, in which there are never enough seats for everyone. Our money is created as bank loans that grow with interest, so the debt economy of numbers on paper has grown far larger than the “real economy” of goods and services, homes and roads, factories and farms.

And the lack of democracy in the workplace also means many people hate their jobs. That’s not inherent in all work — the teacher, nurse, and firefighter may feel good about what they accomplish. We need to restructure our economy so that all jobs are as meaningful as theirs. But that won’t happen under capitalism.


Rising unemployment is inevitable under capitalism. It is in fact inevitable in any system in which the fruits of unstoppable technology (which dramatically increase the output per worker over time) are not distributed fairly.


 

And I’m not talking about “unfettered capitalism” or “corporate capitalism” or “predatory capitalism,” as though capitalism itself were fundamentally sound but we’d recently strayed from it. No, capitalism itself is vile, even in its fundamental principles, even when it is doing what it is supposed to do, even when it is honest, and it can’t be kept honest. The only recent development is that the terrible symptoms are becoming more apparent. I’m trying to explain the underlying disease.

mrmonopoly_colormoney-in-politicsWealth buys government, and erodes its way through any regulations. Winning elections requires expensive advertisements, so our votes merely choose which wealthy candidates will rule over us in their own interest. The only way to avoid rule by the wealthy class is to not have a wealthy class.

dead-duck
Capitalism is immensely destructive. And when people lie to start a war, that’s mass murder. War, poverty, ecocide, and other torments will continue as long as those bring profit to a few people. I want to emphasize that the ecosystem is dying, not because of technology, but because of profit-driventechnology – that is, technology implemented for private gain, without regard for its effects on the rest of the world. We have little time left to change things before the ecosystem collapses completely, killing us all.

And all of that is just the material side of capitalism; its spiritual side is equally biz_devildevastating. We’re often told that any alternative to capitalism would be unrealistic because “human nature is basically greedy and apathetic,” but that’s backward: Capitalism suppresses our better angels, and brings out the worst parts of human nature; it actually causes the greed and apathy all around us.

Power seduces and corrupts. This is demonstrated by the Stanford Prison Experiment and numerous other sociological studies. Perhaps it’s because the powerful justify their power to themselves with some invented histories or philosophies, and then come to believe in those inventions.

Some activists blame our troubles on the personal moral failure of a few greedy individuals. And, yes, those few are willing agents of evil. But the root problem is not capitalists — it’s capitalism. It’s our culture of separateness, which is inside all of us, not just the ruling class. It is inherent in the seemingly harmless middle-class life to which most of us have aspired. To exorcise it, first we must understand it:

separate-houses
Private property creates separateness: You keep your stuff in your house, and I keep my stuff in my house. Your loss is not my loss, and might even be my gain. We’re incessantly told competition is good for us, though just the opposite is true. No wonder bullying is widespread, and our society is hooked on antidepressants.

We’ve hoarded for 10,000 years, and it’s hard to imagine any other way of life. But for 100,000 years before that, we shared everything of importance; we can still find our way back. Nothing less will save us from extinction; nothing more is needed to guide us to utopia. When enough people see capitalism for what it really is, it will fall. Join the conversation – we’re all needed on the planning committee.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Eric Schechter is a former math professor and full time social activist for peace, authentic democracy, and equality. He resides in Nashville, Tenn.


 

Originally produced on 31 March 2013. This web page is also accessible via the URL http://CapitalismDoesntAddUp.org.


APPENDIX: A Possible Scenario

Here’s what I think might happen:

  1. sick-planet
    Initially, things will continue to get worse, in a variety of ways. More extreme weather. More toxic spills. More wars. More massive thefts of the economy (like the great theft of 2008).
  2. People will continue to spread information about all of this, in a variety of ways. More films. More books (the recent one by Naomi Klein is quite good). More essays and articles. More marches. More civil disobedience. More labor strikes.
  3. One by one, more people will continue to gradually wake up about a variety of issues, and more of them will begin to see how all the issues are connected. More people will question the legitimacy of the myths on which our society’s current institutions appear to be based. (Charles Eisenstein’s recent book does that particularly well, and it’s available online for free — scroll about halfway down its page, past the purchase information.)
  4. emperor-has-no-clothes
    After a while, a majority of people will see that those institutions, seemingly the basis of our society, are the chief obstacle to solving our problems. A majority of people will openly lose all respect for those institutions. (“The emperor has no clothes!”)
  5. raised-red-fist5
    Once that has happened, it will be easy to overthrow those institutions. In other words, revolution — but it has to be the right kind of revolution. It won’t be bloodless, because the ruling elite won’t let go of power voluntarily. But there may be very little blood, if the “awakening” has spread far enough. For instance, the rulers cannot roll their tanks over us if we have won over the tank drivers.
  6. Then those of us who have been paying attention can implement the solutions that have been obvious all along: taking control away from the very few, distributing income to those who need it instead of the very few, ending wars, replacing fossil fuels with wind and solar, planting lots of trees, implementing organic and permaculture and agroecology, and so on.

The question is whether this outcome will happen soon enough — i.e., before ecocide has wrecked our lives so thoroughly as to make any remedy impossible. You can help to make this favorable outcome more likely, by helping with step 2, the spreading of information. Most of us can participate in marches. And we can all tell other people about the articles and books and films that have inspired us.


 

2014 Oct 7