Dispatches from Deena Stryker
On the day after the inauguration of a president who declares loud and clear: “We do not seek to impose our way of life on anyone, but rather to let it shine as an example for everyone to follow. We will reinforce old alliances and form new ones — and unite the civilized world against radical Islamic terrorism,” America’s best and brightest, who have formed the corps of the peace movement since the Vietnam War, have come out by the thousands to denounce him for placing peace above individual ‘rights’ such as same sex marriage and abortion.
I say this as a woman who had four abortions during the scary times when they were outlawed. I managed to have them, notwithstanding the risks. But neither I nor my children and grandchildren will survive nuclear war.
Madonna’s response to this hopeful speech was to say she had thought of blowing up the White House, then explaining:” I shared two ways of looking at things — one was to be hopeful, and one was to feel anger and outrage, which I have personally felt.” In a sign of how confused liberals are, Madonna was doing the same sort of thing they criticize Trump for.
Being self-centered, Americans never complain that so little of what is happening in the wider world makes it into the corporate-controlled media with the result that even progressives never coalesced around the Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria wars in anything like the numbers we’re seeing today. Oh, they are against war, water-boarding, the assassination of US citizens abroad, or the military detention of those who blow the whistle on government crimes. But when we finally have a president, however contemptible some of his personal characteristics may be, who calls for an end to US wars of aggression, hundred of thousands take to the streets because his supreme court could one day overturn Roe v. Wade!
I say this as a woman who had four abortions during the scary times when they were outlawed. I managed to have them, notwithstanding the risks. But neither I nor my children and grandchildren will survive nuclear war.
The singers and speakers on podiums across the land who are exhorting their audiences to fight for women’s and LGBT rights were not given free signs when the US went to war in one after another Middle Eastern country. Nobody ‘sent a message’ to Presidents Bush and Obama when they demanded unlimited money for arms manufacturers while cutting SNAP or medicaid.
Listening to the stars being interviewed on CNN, they are right to be defending the control of their bodies, but when they say ‘He’s not my president’, I wonder why progressive women fought harder for Hillary than they did for Bernie. Do they not know that Hillary was/is itching to go to war with Russia — nuclear war? Why was it more important for them to elect a woman president, than to elect a socialist who would not have favored nuclear war with anyone? It’s their fault that we got Trump, when we could have had Bernie, who poles showed would have beaten Trump roundly.
But this situation should not be seen in isolation. Following World War II, people were told they could do anything they wanted as long as they didn’t infringe on others’ identical physical rights. Gradually, the world is discovering that freedom to act must bow to the same limits as nature itself, or see its inner freedom disappear.
The press anointed Donald Trump because it could not resist ‘a good story’, and now it colludes with those trying to close the barn door. The President just finished speaking to employees of the CIA, who demonstrated often and loudly that they agreed with his agenda to eliminate ISIS, a bigger threat to women potentially than the Supreme Court. And yet, a CNN panel ripped his appearance apart over details of style. Not because Trump can’t be trusted with the nuclear football. But because his ‘deals’ would put arms manufacturers out to pasture, while healing our soldiers, who, as the CIA crowd showed vociferously, will support him to the hilt.
DEENA STRYKER, Senior Contributing Editor
Born in Philadelphia, Stryker spent most of her adolescent and adult years in Europe, resulting over time in several unique books, her latest being
CUBA: Diary of a Revolution, Inside the Cuban Revolution with Fidel, Raul, Che, and Celia Sanchez
America Revealed to a Honey-Colored World
A Taoist Politics: The Case For Sacredness
She began her journalistic career at the French News Agency in Rome, spent two years in Cuba finding out whether the Barbados were Communists before they made the revolution (‘Cuba 1964: When the Revolution was Young’). After spending half a decade in Eastern Europe, and a decade in the U.S., studying Global Survival and writing speeches in the Carter State Department, she wrote the only book that foresaw the fall of the Berlin Wall AND the dissolution of the Soviet Union (“Une autre Europe, un autre Monde’). Her memoir, ‘Lunch with Fellini, Dinner with Fidel’, tells it all. ‘A Taoist Politics: The Case for Sacredness’, which examines the similarities between ancient wisdom and modern science and what this implies for political activism; and ‘America Revealed to a Honey-Colored World” is a pamphlet about how the U.S. came down from the City on a Hill’.
APPENDIX
For the record
Madonna Women’s March Speech “Blowing Up The White House” on Washington Protest Trump
FULL SPEECH
MAIN IMAGE: Madonna shooting her mouth off at the women’s rally. Where was Madonna and her ilk during the long years that Clinton and Obama martyred the whole Middle East, especially Libya and Syria?
Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com
We apologize for this inconvenience.
What will it take to bring America to live according to its own propaganda?
=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
Please see our red registration box at the bottom of this page
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole responsibility of the author(s). The Greanville Post, a publication of The Voice of Nature Network, Inc., (VNN), a not-for-profit 501 (c) (3) corporation, will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect statement in this article. The Greanville Post grants permission to cross-post original The Greanville Post articles on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified. The source and the author’s copyright must be displayed. For publication of The Greanville Post articles in print or other forms including commercial internet sites, contact:
THE GREANVILLE POST contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, economic and social issues, and the furtherance of peace and social justice, the defence of our planetary ecosystems, and the prevention and eventual elimination of human abuse, exploitation,.and cruelty toward any and all non-human species The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
For media inquiries contact us at greanville@gmail.com
The cliche thinking of Trump hatred is remarkable. Even if he were to execute all his wayward and dangerous ideas, he is still no worse than his predecessors and a lot less so than the alternative Clinton. It appears rather that Trump has gathered all the hatred for a corrupt governmental system (that he promised to combat) and thus has become the target of women’s anger against whatever traces of discrimination against them remain. The absurd speeches by the privileged women like Madonna, Judd and their comrades expressing that which less advantaged women cannot elucidate are indicative of the deep… Read more »
THE WRITER IS ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. Madonna, Meryl Streep et al typify the limo liberal, the “latte radicals” who are simply useless in terms of class struggle (indeed they prefer the harmless identity politics, whereby capitalists do not need to give up any of their power!). Madonna’s net worth is in excess of 500 MM—that’s half a billion. She sure doesn’t have a lot in common with her “sisters” in the working class. Beyoce and her husband JayZ command almost 1 billion. And so it goes. Consider that in the 1950s, when actors were already paid much more than average people,… Read more »
A fatal mistake in these marches was that no mention was made or action taken about the economic divide between the haves and have-nots, which is a basic underlying problem in this society as Dr. King well understood later on in his life. The identity politics in fact undermine revolutionary insight and the class war was clearly visible with the election of Trump. As with everything in this capitalist society the demonstrations will be used to the profit of the media and studied for tighter control. What the Trump presidency promises is what happens if one cracks open a rotten… Read more »
To respond to Marcellus;
In fact these performers are employees and propagandists of and for the status quo, the CIA, and what have you to spread the benign face (fake humanitarianism) of US culture abroad. There was already a project to promote US painters in the fifties (the Abstract Expressionist movement) in governmentally backed exhibitions of these artists abroad, thereby ensuring the fiscal success of their products. If one becomes a lackey to the cultural promotion of the powers-that-be one becomes very rich indeed (as one artist once said:”he knew on which side his bread was oiled”).