Revealed: Trump Administration Aborted Operation That Would Have Provoked War With Iran

FRONTLINENEWSLOGO-2


Richard Brandt
RUSSIA INSIDER


The New York Times details an aborted operation that would have very likely started a shooting war with Iran


Too close for comfort.

Iranian patrol boat. Too close for comfort.

Buried in the middle of the New York Times’ story on the inner workings of Trump’s National Security Council is a revelation almost too terrifying to believe: Last week, the U.S. Navy came close to intercepting and boarding an Iranian ship — allegedly in an attempt to stop the flow of weapons to the Houthis in Yemen.

We don’t want to believe it, but frankly Trump’s team is so hawkish on Iran, it’s hard to completely dismiss:

Last week, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis was exploring whether the Navy could intercept and board an Iranian ship to look for contraband weapons possibly headed to Houthi fighters in Yemen. The potential interdiction seemed in keeping with recent instructions from Mr. Trump, reinforced in meetings with Mr. Mattis and Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, to crack down on Iran’s support of terrorism.

But the ship was in international waters in the Arabian Sea, according to two officials. Mr. Mattis ultimately decided to set the operation aside, at least for now. White House officials said that was because news of the impending operation leaked, a threat to security that has helped fuel the move for the insider threat program. But others doubt whether there was enough basis in international law, and wondered what would happen if, in the early days of an administration that has already seen one botched military action in Yemen, American forces were suddenly in a firefight with the Iranian Navy.

Ah yes, that annoying little detail, “international law”. And are we supposed to be reassured that Mattis has set the operation aside “at least for now”?

It’s clear that the risks involved could never justify any potential “positive” outcome for Washington, like a few less guns for the Houthis.

Trump’s opposition to the wars in Iraq, Libya and Syria doesn’t count for much if he’s keen on provoking a shooting war with Iran.

Oh, and by the way — who benefits from a war between the United States and Iran?

You probably know the answer.


MAIN IMAGE: The USS carrier Iwo Jima, part of the Fifth Fleet on patrol in the Persian Gulf. What the devil is the American fleet doing thousands of miles from its home ports? If America respected other nations, would it need to have all these extravagant machines of war to intimidate them? 

black-horizontal

NOTE: ALL IMAGE CAPTIONS, PULL QUOTES AND COMMENTARY BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS • PLEASE COMMENT AND DEBATE DIRECTLY ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP. JUST CLICK HERE.
           

Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long grey



black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary.  In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.  

horiz-black-wide
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




black-horizontal