White House shakeup: A further step toward authoritarian rule

horiz-long grey

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON IT.

Patrick Martin, wsws.org
(With select original comments)


Friday’s announcement by President Trump removing White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and replacing him with retired Gen. John F. Kelly marks a further stage in the emergence of the military brass as the decisive political power in the Trump administration.

With General Kelly as White House chief of staff, Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, an active duty officer, as national security adviser, and retired Gen. James Mattis as secretary of defense, military men hold three of the top four appointed positions in the executive branch.



Press coverage of the White House transition has focused almost entirely on the Twitter antics by Trump and the vulgar ranting by his new communications director, former hedge fund boss Anthony Scaramucci. A sober assessment of the actual political implications of the White House reshuffle reveals, however, that the events of the past week mark a major turning point for the Trump administration and the crisis-ridden US political system as a whole.

Trump fired Priebus, the former chairman of the Republican National Committee, whom he chose as chief of staff to act as a conduit to the Republican congressional leadership and the party establishment. He has replaced him with a retired Marine general with no political record and an avowed and well-publicized contempt for civilian oversight of the military—one, moreover, who, as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, has overseen the administration’s program of mass arrests and deportations of undocumented immigrants.

The president coupled the removal of Priebus with a public blast against Senate Republicans, including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, over their failure last week to enact any version of a repeal of the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act.

Trump responded with a series of tweets saying Senate Republicans “look like fools” and demanding that McConnell trample on minority rights in the Senate and proceed immediately to push through White House proposals for slashing taxes on the wealthy and gutting social programs such as Medicaid.

Trump presents himself more and more as a ruler above the two capitalist political parties, while seeking to surround himself with uniformed audiences. He addressed 40,000 Boy Scouts assembled at a jamboree in West Virginia, then gave a speech Friday to police on Long Island in which he endorsed “rough” treatment for immigrants and others under arrest, touching off chants of “USA, USA” from the assembled cops.

While inciting police violence, Trump made direct appeals to ultra-right bigotry with a tweet calling for the expulsion of transgendered people from the military and new legal steps by the Justice Department directed against the democratic rights of homosexuals.

Added to this is the rancid atmosphere of palace intrigue in the White House. It is widely reported that Trump family members played a key role in the firing of Priebus, with son-in-law Jared Kushner, daughter Ivanka Trump and First Lady Melania Trump all weighing in.

In all of this there is the stench of dictatorship. Trump is pursuing a definite political strategy. He is seeking to carve out for himself, as the representative of the financial oligarchy, a position of power independent of the apparatuses of the establishment political parties and the traditional institutions of bourgeois rule such as Congress, the courts and the so-called mainstream media.

Like all would-be Bonapartist autocrats, he seeks to establish a personalist regime based on the military and police. His use of Twitter is an essential component of this effort. He bypasses the establishment media and makes his appeal directly to the military and police while seeking to whip up national chauvinism and all forms of social and political backwardness. He seeks in this way to establish a base he can mobilize independently of the political parties.

But Trump is not some aberration or accident, an interloper into the otherwise pristine precincts of American democracy. He is the product of decades of uninterrupted war, reaction and decay of political culture within the ruling class and all official institutions, including academia—a process that has been presided over by both big-business parties. This has coincided with the rise of a criminal financial oligarchy and a staggering growth of social inequality to levels incompatible with democratic norms.

The Democratic Party for its part welcomes the appointment of Kelly. Its opposition to Trump continues to be centered on demands for an escalation of the confrontation with Russia. It welcomes any sign that this is being done, such as the White House’s announcement that Trump will sign the bill passed last week with virtual bipartisan unanimity imposing new sanctions on Russia, as well as Iran and North Korea.

It fears no less than the Republicans the growth of social opposition and anticapitalist sentiment in the working class and supports the domination of the military over the political system as insurance against the threat of social revolution.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi praised General Kelly during an appearance on Fox News Sunday, while expressing the hope that he would improve the functioning of the Trump White House. “I will be speaking with him today and look forward to working with him,” she said.

On another Sunday interview program, CNN’s “State of the Union,” Democratic Representative Barbara Lee was grilled for remarking that by putting General Kelly in charge, “President Trump is militarizing the White House and putting our executive branch in the hands of an extremist.” Lee backpedaled from the suggestion that she was antimilitary, declaring, “Let me first say, I have come from a military family… And so I respect and honor the military and recognize the sacrifices that all of our military men and women make as well as General Kelly and his history and his sacrifices.”

Senator Bernie Sanders appeared on the same program and did not even make reference to the White House shakeup.

The concentration of wealth in the hands of a tiny financial oligarchy, personified by social criminals like Trump and Scaramucci, is completely incompatible with democratic rights. The defense of democratic rights falls to the working class, as a central element in its struggle for the abolition of the profit system and the socialist reorganization of society.


SELECTED COMMENTS (Original thread)

Though I agree with the concerns of the commenters here, I also believe that the WSWS is sensationalizing the threat of Trump and his minions. However, the article does repeat some very salient points.

First and foremost there is enough good analysis to show that Trump is way too incompetent and mentally ill to adhere to any ideology. As many have stated, he listens to the last person in the room.

This does not mean that there is no leaning towards some level of authoritarian rule. However, it is hardly fascist as many across the media of all types incorrectly promote. It is instead, totalitarian.

The executive branch has basically become powerless against a seriously, dysfunctional Congress so its only recourse is through executive orders, though dangerous in of themselves are somewhat limited. So far the States are refusing to adhere to the most heinous of them.

Second, the Republican Congress is fractured mess of personnel that with the exception of a handful of reasonable people will not be able to accomplish much of any person's agenda. For once the Democrats are fighting back as a unified opposition turning a bare number of Republicans to their side. However, I am not at all exactly thrilled with many Democrats either.

The brightest spot on the horizon are the States that are slowly adhering to their own set of priorities setting themselves against the Trump dysfunctional administration and Congress.

Now to the development of a social movement of the working class; this is pie-in-the-sky thinking. It simply will not happen. This is not the 1960s when the US government still had rational people in it making the laws, good, bad, or indifferent. And even then social movements largely failed to accomplish their goals with the exception of African American Civil Rights due to the greater cohesiveness of African Americans across the nation.

As to all other progressive groups in the United States; they are all just a bunch of dominoes that the federal government can easily deal with since they present very easy targets for "divide & conquer" strategies.

You people want a revolution that will be more or less non-violent than you better begin considering military-style hierarchies with functional divisions that all have specific tasks, all of which support the whole, while providing a large degree of cohesiveness.

Anything else is just talk... and a waste of your time and effort...

Who says we want "a revolution that will be more or less non-violent"? To suggest that members of the ICFI do not know about tasks, cohesiveness and tactics is laughable. We have the entire history of the Russian Revolution, which we study closely, to learn from. The ICFI was founded in 1938 and a lot of history has proven that it is either socialism or barbarism. You apparently are content to settle for barbarism.

  • Avatar

    This is all Bannon and his cohorts. As a Julius Evola fascist admirer, Bannon never left the WH as the corporate press would have you believe. He is the brains of Trump. And because both are fascists, you will now see the complete redressing of the authoritarian state.

    As to the democrats, forget about them, they are the party of yesterday.

    Avatar

    I hope to bring out the meaning of your comment, as I think you are hinting: Evola was a big admirer of hierarchy and attributed religious levels of significance to the persistence of hierarchy in the modern military. Even if Bannon is not consciously drawing on Evola, his interests are far away from the banal capitalism of the GOP, and extremely similar to military interests. I expect to see more military-executive cooperation in the future if neither Trump nor Bannon is outright deposed.

    Avatar

    It seems as though this has been planned for a long time. On the occasion of Trump's inauguration, the audience was baffled when a uniformed squad of military men suddenly appeared behind him on the West Steps. Now it's all too clear what the ruling elite have in store for us, the meddlesome herd, generally unworthy of the right to speak, write, be employed, eat, have housing, free access to education and healthcare, or voice a political opinion. Peaceful political protest will soon be an act of terrorism. The move by Google to censor the internet happened last week. Things are moving rapidly.

    Avatar

    In other words: it is a move to fascistic dictatorship.

    The whole conflict between Trump and the rest of "swampy establishment" is just because "the swamp" thinking that fascistic nature becoming too obvious.

    Avatar

    Do Americans even care? We've had almost a generation of unexamined war and "support the troops", and most recently support (read worship) the police. While parenting has gone from authoritarian to permissive, it appears that authoritarianism is tolerated as long as it's directed to others. Fear certainly works as a propaganda tool.

    Avatar

    Excellent phrase - "unexamined war". Yes, as long as their meager financial interests are met - easy jobs, big houses, big cars, cheap gas and free highways - most people just go long. The media doesn't wake them up from their trance.

    Avatar

    Of course Americans care, and it is not true that "most worship the police." The police are feared and increasingly hated. The challenge for workers is knowing what political response to make and how. The appearance of quiet and complacency is due to there being no political vehicle for opposition currently present on a mass scale, and this masks the deep social opposition that exists itself--although I have to say, that opposition is much more present in recent years than, say, in the last 10-15. 13 million Americans voted to support Sanders because he said was a socialist.

    Let's be objective about this and not despair and blame workers. It's time to get to work at making the revolutionary party of the working class known, understood, and -- through a tireless struggle -- supported on a mass scale by workers worldwide.

    Avatar

    No, most Americans don't care. Let's be realistic. They care about celebrities and sports, not about people being blown to bits in the Middle East or elsewhere. Most people I talk to don't even know there was a war in Libya or that the president can kill American citizens without a trial.

    Avatar

    See, you are making a ridiculous statement--not only do you not know it empirically that most dont care, you are not basing your claim on any serious analysis of the political situation or indicators of the development of political consciousness. There is a method employed by this movement, you could engage with it. Otherwise it seems like you are simply venting your spleen.

    You have commented often on the WSWS to claim that working people are racist and in general quite base. What is the purpose of airing these shallow prejudices on the page of a revolutionary party? Do you think we will give up and join you to passively stew in pessimism and rancor? One would think spending so much time here, some political perspective might have rubbed off onto you.

    Avatar

    I have to agree, and thanks for the injection of your most needed objective thoughts. For those who think there will be a removal of Trump or Bannon . well , I suppose any thing is possible in the hell hole of caos that has been created, but I'm not holding my breath . And if such a deed were to happen , can any one believe the replacement will be any better . If it were to happen it would be with the intention to escalate the current trend towards war , militarism , and the continued assaults against the working class. The only solution lies in the unified action of the international working class to completely reject the capitalist system , an sieze power of the means of a failed system .

    Avatar

    I do agree some do hate and fear the police. But others donot. I know this from first hand experience. I wish I could post photos here.
    For example where I workout. In front of the gym, there are several parking slots reserved for "Warriors" (i.e. Soldiers ) and others reserved for "Heros" (i.e. Police and the like). This is the mindset among some. I run into this ALL the time.

    Avatar

    Yes bootlicking is certainly encouraged, but it is not the dominant attitude toward the police among the majority. That's why the police murders are so explosive: it is every day becoming clearer what the police and the state are. This is in part a function of the social crisis itself. As the social attacks advance, class issues are pushed to fore, and this uncovers at the highest level the class nature of the state, and for that matter of a lot of what has passed for "left" politics in the last decades.

About the Author
 Patrick Martin is a senior editor with wsws.org, a socialist publication.  



Trump presents himself more and more as a ruler above the two capitalist political parties, while seeking to surround himself with uniformed audiences. He addressed 40,000 Boy Scouts assembled at a jamboree in West Virginia, then gave a speech Friday to police on Long Island in which he endorsed “rough” treatment for immigrants and others under arrest, touching off chants of “USA, USA” from the assembled cops.

[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]

Parting shot—a word from the editors
The Best Definition of Donald Trump We Have Found

In his zeal to prove to his antagonists in the War Party that he is as bloodthirsty as their champion, Hillary Clinton, and more manly than Barack Obama, Trump seems to have gone “play-crazy” -- acting like an unpredictable maniac in order to terrorize the Russians into forcing some kind of dramatic concessions from their Syrian allies, or risk Armageddon.However, the “play-crazy” gambit can only work when the leader is, in real life, a disciplined and intelligent actor, who knows precisely what actual boundaries must not be crossed. That ain’t Donald Trump -- a pitifully shallow and ill-disciplined man, emotionally handicapped by obscene privilege and cognitively crippled by white American chauvinism. By pushing Trump into a corner and demanding that he display his most bellicose self, or be ceaselessly mocked as a “puppet” and minion of Russia, a lesser power, the War Party and its media and clandestine services have created a perfect storm of mayhem that may consume us all. Glen Ford, Editor in Chief, Black Agenda Report