Parting shot—a word from the editors
The Best Definition of Donald Trump We Have Found
In his zeal to prove to his antagonists in the War Party that he is as bloodthirsty as their champion, Hillary Clinton, and more manly than Barack Obama, Trump seems to have gone “play-crazy” -- acting like an unpredictable maniac in order to terrorize the Russians into forcing some kind of dramatic concessions from their Syrian allies, or risk Armageddon.However, the “play-crazy” gambit can only work when the leader is, in real life, a disciplined and intelligent actor, who knows precisely what actual boundaries must not be crossed. That ain’t Donald Trump -- a pitifully shallow and ill-disciplined man, emotionally handicapped by obscene privilege and cognitively crippled by white American chauvinism. By pushing Trump into a corner and demanding that he display his most bellicose self, or be ceaselessly mocked as a “puppet” and minion of Russia, a lesser power, the War Party and its media and clandestine services have created a perfect storm of mayhem that may consume us all.— Glen Ford, Editor in Chief, Black Agenda Report
How many animals were sacrificed to the judeo.christian god and the god of science…. Now only the rich and entitled can get new organs after a lifetime of excesses and indulgences…. It is the natural order, living beings are born, live and die…. the unwillingness to face the cycle of life, but to control it has led to more harm than good.
The latest turn in the road to conquest of nature wasn’t worth the moral slide into the sadistic violence of vivisection…..
Science without reverence for life is destruction and violence….
With a mindset that applauds the sadism and violence of vivisection, comes the mindset that justifies cruelty for a righteous cause…. righteousness is just another name for sanctified sadism: Proverbs 12:10: “The righteous person regards the life of his or her animal.” Closer scrutiny reveals the true nature of these words:”In Judaism, one who is unnecessarily cruel to animals cannot be regarded as a righteous individual.” Prof Richard Schwartz, Jewish Vegetarian Association. The intent of the necessity clause is to present cruelty to animals as a righteous endeavor, for it implies: one who is of necessity cruel to animals can… Read more »
No mention is made of vivisection on animals in this article, only to show that human stem cells can be bred to cover replacement of human organs. Eisenbud’s prejudicial condemnation hits far outside the target. It has nothing to do with cruelty towards animals which is indeed a horrid human failing and arguments deriving from quotes out of the bible do not bring much enlightenment.