Big Pharma’s control over the news
By Jon Rappoport
From No More Fake News
Full Pharma Disclosure (Image by Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com)
Over the last 11 months, pharmaceutical companies have spent a stunning $3.2 billion on TV ads for drugs.
That much money buys you influence. It buys you control.
If a major network suddenly decided to set its hounds loose and investigate the overall devastating effects of medical drugs on the public, there would be hell to pay at the network. Drug companies wouldn't stand for it.
Robert F Kennedy, Jr., whose film, Trace Amounts, about toxic mercury in vaccines, was getting no media coverage, made this comment:
"I talked to Roger Ailes [then CEO of FOX News], who I have known since I was 17 years old, he's very sympathetic with this issue and saw the film Trace Amounts. I said to him, 'I just want to go on one of your shows. Nobody will allow me to talk about this or debate me.' He said to me, 'I can't allow you on any of them. I'd have to fire any of my hosts that allowed you on my station.' Because he said, 'My news division gets up to 70% of advertising revenues during non-election years from the pharmaceutical companies'."
That's called control.
There is a wider sphere to consider. Through octopus foundations like Rockefeller and Gates, for example, the medical/pharma agenda is part and parcel of the Globalist agenda. That is key. Gathering in the world population under the umbrella of "humanitarian health care" is a covert op of the highest order.
How can you control billions of people, erase national borders, destroy untold numbers of communities and their traditions, wage senseless wars, send millions of jobs out of industrial countries to Third World backwaters, and build a de facto global management system -- unless you can also debilitate, weaken, confuse, toxify, and thus pacify those billions of people?
Accomplishing this is the work of the pharmaceutical empire.
I have produced, many times, open-source mainstream reviews of the death and damage numbers wrought by "Rockefeller medicine." In the US, 106,000 deaths every year from government-approved medicines. In the US and Europe, 330,000 die, every year, from correctly prescribed drugs...6.6 million hospitalizations occur...80 million adverse effects occur. These are conservative estimates.
So...what is the likelihood that pharma-controlled mainstream news will dig deeply into the issue of Globalism, the major tyrannical movement of our time?
The likelihood is zero.
Direct to Consumer tv ads are a pestilence permitted in only two countries in the world, the US and New Zealand.
The influence of pharmaceutical interests on the news is, therefore, much greater than most people can fathom, in their wildest dreams.
Most people, when confronted with these pharmaceutical death-and-destruction reports, will immediately dismiss them as impossible. Others, who accept the reports, will claim the "unfortunate" facts show no intention to harm whatsoever.
However, the reports are public knowledge. They've been available to one and all. Government officials -- and particularly, pharma princes -- know the truth. And they're doing nothing about it.
This is called a clue.
If you were in charge of a juggernaut operation that was causing this much horrific damage, and you knew it, would you stand by and let it keep happening? Would you foster the development of new drugs whose effects would only add to the ongoing tragedy? And would you exert such powerful control over major media that the truth could not be told?
I didn't think so.
The pharma princes are not like you. You can't see who they are if you look through the lens of your morality. They don't share that morality. They don't resemble you. Don't ascribe your qualities to them. They don't respond to life as you do. Their capacity for self-deception is awesome. Your good is not their good.
It is as if they were born freezing and never recovered. They come from an Ice Age and their blood is still cold.
They are rigid robots. Muscular truth can take them down.
Submitters Website: http://nomorefakenews.com
email: qjrpress@gmail.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]
By subscribing you won’t miss the special editions. |
Parting shot—a word from the editors
The Best Definition of Donald Trump We Have Found
In his zeal to prove to his antagonists in the War Party that he is as bloodthirsty as their champion, Hillary Clinton, and more manly than Barack Obama, Trump seems to have gone “play-crazy” -- acting like an unpredictable maniac in order to terrorize the Russians into forcing some kind of dramatic concessions from their Syrian allies, or risk Armageddon.However, the “play-crazy” gambit can only work when the leader is, in real life, a disciplined and intelligent actor, who knows precisely what actual boundaries must not be crossed. That ain’t Donald Trump -- a pitifully shallow and ill-disciplined man, emotionally handicapped by obscene privilege and cognitively crippled by white American chauvinism. By pushing Trump into a corner and demanding that he display his most bellicose self, or be ceaselessly mocked as a “puppet” and minion of Russia, a lesser power, the War Party and its media and clandestine services have created a perfect storm of mayhem that may consume us all.— Glen Ford, Editor in Chief, Black Agenda Report
window.newShareCountsAuto="smart";