1.5K
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Apparently the NYTimes, mirroring the fear of the establishment, is now scaremongering about YouTube, finding it a "radicalising" platform ("radicals" are always bad for a status quo shill like the Times). The problem here is that Google, which owns YouTube, is altready leading the charge against "radicalisation" and free speech. What will satisfy the Times editors? Having content policed like Facebook has also instituted?
The Jimmy Dore Show
Published on Jun 12, 2019
This post is part of our Orphaned Truths series with leading cultural and political analysts.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
PLEASE COMMENT ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP OR IN THE OPINION WINDOW BELOW.
All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors.
All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors.
