Before discussing the mater further, do note that Kluth states in one of his closing paras that progress in this immensely promising field has been slow because investors have been few and unenthusiastic about pouring capital into ventures that might not see a return for decades, a clear indictment of the capitalist way of medicine, not to mention bad governance of public and private institutions. Indeed, if such is the case, where is the NIH and the richly endowed universities conducting basic research or charities such as the American Cancer Society (ACS)? Are public monies dedicated to this? Are other governments around the world also pursuing these lines of inquiry? If not, why not? The author does not address those matters. Common sense would suggest an international interest in these fields of research, especially since modern science is more integrated than ever, despite the hurdles put in its path by capitalist proprietary rules. But in an age of global absurdity, of grossly distorted policy by deliberate intent, we should never assume that what is right, moral, and obvious will be the norm.
Finally, we publish this information as a public service, and in the hope that the basic ideas in the article will be received for what they are, a testament to the boundless creativity and nobility of many human beings, even when surrounded by institutions and people with repugnantly selfish values. Ideally, it should not detonate another round of arguments between vaxxers and anti-vaxxers, especially since vaccines these days are seen by far too many as nothing but vectors for sordid elite manipulation, enrichment, and outright attacks on the health and political freedom of the proles.
Are such people off their rocker? Not necessarily. Elites have a very long history of betrayals of the public interest, often crossing into the depraved and criminal. And furthermore, everything that is planned or enters the market as a commodity is subject to the calculus of maximum profit, not maximum social benefit. That means that, as we do in many other areas of social and personal choice, we must look at the field of vaccines on a case by case basis. No generalisations will do. It's disgusting alright, that we have to do this, but the capitalist way of life is like a minefield forcing us to pick our path with extreme caution. That said, the fact the capitalists can't be fully trusted does not mean we need to reject science, act like Luddites, and turn our backs on the marvelous gifts of modern physics, chemistry and medicine. Contrary to the pessimistic Malthusianism permeating so many people in the West, technology is not our enemy. As a supertool created by our flawed species, a lot of modern technology is inherently Janusian: it can do much good or much evil. But the script that controls this tool is written by us, and it's coded in political language.—PG
Technology & Ideas • Bloomberg Opinion
mRNA Vaccines Could Vanquish Covid Today, Cancer TomorrowThe best news about the mRNA shots from BioNTech and Moderna is that the same technique could also defeat many other diseases. But take another look at some of these new vaccines. And then contemplate the dawn to come — not just its first rays in the coming months but also the bright light of future years and decades. It looks increasingly plausible that the same weapons we’ll use to defeat Covid-19 can also vanquish even grimmer reapers — including cancer, which kills almost 10 million people a year. The most promising Covid vaccines use nucleic acids called messenger RNA, or mRNA. One vaccine comes from the German firm BioNTech SE and its U.S. partner Pfizer Inc. The other is from the U.S. company Moderna Inc. (its original spelling was ModeRNA, its ticker is MRNA). Another is on the way from CureVac NV, also based in Germany. Ordinary vaccines tend to be inactivated or weakened viruses which, when injected into the body, stimulate an immune response that can later protect against the live pathogen. But the process of making such vaccines requires various chemicals and cell cultures. This takes time and provides opportunities for contamination. mRNA vaccines don’t have these problems. They instruct the body itself to make the offending proteins — in this case, the ones that wrap around the viral RNA of SARS-CoV-2. The immune system then homes in on these antigens, practicing for the day when the same proteins show up with the coronavirus attached. Therein lies mRNA’s bigger promise: It can tell our cells to make whatever protein we want. That includes the antigens of many other diseases besides Covid-19. In its day-to-day function, mRNA takes instructions from its molecular cousin, the DNA in our cell nuclei. Stretches of the genome are copied, which the mRNA carries into the cytoplasm, where little cellular factories called ribosomes use the information to churn out proteins. BioNTech and Moderna shortcut this process, by skipping the whole fiddly business in the nucleus with the DNA. Instead, they first figure out what protein they want — for example, a spike on the coat around a virus. Then they look at the sequence of amino acids that makes this protein. From that they derive the precise instructions the mRNA must give. This process can be relatively fast, which is why it took less than a year to make the vaccines, a pace previously unimaginable. It’s also genetically safe — mRNA can’t go back into the nucleus and accidentally insert genes into our DNA. Researchers since the 1970s have had a hunch that you can use this technique to fight all sorts of maladies. But as usual in science, you need huge amounts of money, time and patience to sort out all the intermediary problems. After a decade of enthusiasm, mRNA became academically unfashionable in the 1990s. Progress seemed halting. The main obstacle was that injecting mRNA into animals often caused fatal inflammation. Enter Katalin Kariko — a Hungarian scientist who immigrated to the U.S. in the 1980s and has heroically devoted her entire career to mRNA, through its ups and downs. In the 1990s, she lost her funding, was demoted, had her salary cut and suffered other setbacks. But she stuck with it. And then, after battling cancer herself, she made the crucial breakthrough. In the 2000s, she and her research partner realized that swapping out uridine, one of mRNA’s “letters,” avoided causing inflammation without otherwise compromising the code. The mice stayed alive. Her study was read by a scientist at Stanford University, Derrick Rossi, who later co-founded Moderna. It also came to the attention of Ugur Sahin and Ozlem Tureci, two oncologists who are husband and wife and co-founded BioNTech. They licensed Kariko’s technology and hired her. From the start, they were most interested in curing cancer. Today’s weapons against cancer will one day seem as primitive an idea as flint axes in a surgery room. To kill a malignant tumor, you generally zap it with radiation or chemicals, damaging lots of other tissue in the process. The better way to fight cancer, Sahin and Tureci realized, is to treat each tumor as genetically unique and to train the immune systems of individual patients against that specific enemy. A perfect job for mRNA. You find the antigen, get its fingerprint, reverse-engineer the cellular instructions to target the culprit and let the body do the rest. Take a look at the pipelines of Moderna and BioNTech. They include drug trials for treating cancers of the breast, prostate, skin, pancreas, brain, lung and other tissues, as well as vaccines against everything from influenza to Zika and rabies. The prospects appear good. Progress, admittedly, has been slow. Part of the explanation Sahin and Tureci give is that investors in this sector must put up oodles of capital and then wait for more than a decade, first for the trials, then for regulatory approvals. In the past, too few were in the mood. Covid-19, fingers crossed, may turbo-charge all these processes. The pandemic has led to a grand debut of mRNA vaccines and their definitive proof of concept. Already, there are murmurs about a Nobel Prize for Kariko. Henceforth, mRNA will have no problems getting money, attention or enthusiasm — from investors, regulators and policymakers. That doesn’t mean the last stretch will be easy. But in this dark hour, it’s permissible to bask in the light that’s dawning. Andreas Kluth is a columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. He was previously editor in chief of Handelsblatt Global and a writer for the Economist. He's the author of "Hannibal and Me." Read more opinionFollow @andreaskluth on Twitter This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. To contact the author of this story: To contact the editor responsible for this story: |
It looks increasingly plausible that the same weapons we’ll use to defeat Covid-19 can also vanquish even grimmer reapers — including cancer, which kills almost 10 million people a year https://t.co/kM0QTouWhN pic.twitter.com/F5VQ9DuKcz
— Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) January 11, 2021
The most promising Covid vaccines use nucleic acids called mRNA.
They instruct the body to create the same proteins that wrap around the viral RNA of SARS-CoV-2. The immune system then familiarizes itself with the proteins ahead of potential infection https://t.co/kM0QTouWhN pic.twitter.com/QQ969DhB7U
— Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) January 11, 2021
In its day-to-day function, mRNA takes instructions from the DNA in our cell nuclei.
Stretches of the genome are copied, which the mRNA carries into the cytoplasm, where little cellular factories called ribosomes use the information to churn out proteins https://t.co/kM0QTouWhN pic.twitter.com/PWJAMvm29g
— Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) January 11, 2021
This process can be relatively fast, which is why it took less than a year to make the vaccines, a pace previously unimaginable.
It’s also genetically safe — mRNA can’t go back into the nucleus and accidentally insert genes into our DNA https://t.co/kM0QTouWhN pic.twitter.com/D9ulBQA8V6
— Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) January 11, 2021
That’s a perfect job for mRNA:
1️⃣Find the antigen
2️⃣Get its fingerprint
3️⃣Reverse-engineer the cellular instructions to target the culprit
4️⃣Let the body do the resthttps://t.co/kM0QTouWhN pic.twitter.com/A1vIy6delq— Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) January 11, 2021
Take a look at the pipelines of Moderna and BioNTech. They include drug trials for cancers of the:
????Breast
????Prostate
????Skin
????Pancreas
????Brain
????LungAs well as vaccines against everything from influenza to Zika and rabies https://t.co/kM0QTouWhN pic.twitter.com/8RwFgbfAYF
— Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) January 11, 2021
Covid-19 may turbo-charge all these processes. The pandemic has led to a grand debut of mRNA vaccines and their definitive proof of concept.
mRNA should have no problems getting money, attention or enthusiasm — from investors, regulators and policymakers https://t.co/kM0QTouWhN pic.twitter.com/McZoZyHSdn
— Bloomberg Opinion (@bopinion) January 11, 2021
And this skeptical comment, which we certainly support, since our profit-centered healthcare system remains a world-class disgrace (it actually means we need to struggle with more determination than ever and win!):
You must not be familiar with the money-machine that the cancer industry is. @emoryhealthcare charges $14K per 10mg of Vectibix. Snowball’s chance in hell a vaccine is produced to rid our bodies of cancer. Too much money on the table. Healthcare industry simple looks other way.
— Ryan Woolsey (@ryanwoolsey) January 12, 2021
[premium_newsticker id="211406"]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License