The headless chicken and the bear
The wave after wave of vicious lies and slanders against Russia, spawned by the US/UK soft power apparatus, but eagerly replicated throughout the EU by Washington's poodles, has finally prompted Russia to put its foot down. Introducing the headless chicken The EU has a major problem: it is run by a comprador class which is entirely dependent on the United States. Okay, that by itself is not the problem I am referring to. The problem I am referring to is one we could call the problem of the decapitated chicken: a decapitated chicken can run without a head, but it sure does not know where it is running or why. This happens to all comprador classes when their beloved masters suddenly vanish. This is exactly what happened to the European ruling classes when Trump came to the White House: they “lost their head” and they began running all over the place, obviously achieving nothing. Now that the Neocons gave Trump the boot, the EU rulers are desperate to show the new US leaders that they only hated Trump, not the USA, and what better way to show your complete submission than by barking at the Asiatic Mordor of the East known as “Russia”? This latest PSYOP was apparently organized in the USA last fall, while Trump was still in power, at least nominally. This makes sense, just like the huge “Patriot Act” was carefully prepared months, if not years before 9/11 happened. This time around, some US intelligence agency (probably the CIA) then passed the baby to the German BND which was supposed to act as an intermediary to give the US “plausible deniability”. The big problem is that the Germans apparently screwed things up, and the plan was a flop: the latest sacral victim failed to die (again!). As for Putin, he used his executive power to allow Navalnyi (who was on parole) to immediately fly to Germany for treatment as soon as the Russian medics stabilized him. From there on, everything went south and Navalnyi’s curators scrambled to save whatever could be saved. They produced a movie about Putin’s palace in Crimea, only to have Russian reporters film the location and prove that this movie was a total fake. Then they sent Navalnyi back to Russia figuring that if the Russian authorities arrested him huge protests would follow or, alternatively, if the Russians did nothing, Navalnyi would be able to create chaos during an important election year in Russia. This resulted in another flop, not only were the crowds in Russia small, their behavior was deeply offensive and even frightening to most Russians who have seen enough Maidans and color revolutions to know how this stuff ends. As for Navalnyi, he was arrested immediately upon landing, and his parole was revoked. The Big Western Networks join the PSYOP: Here's the BBC And here's Germany's "assist" in this pathetic operation. Courtesy of Deutsche Welle. And here's an "anonymous" post, courtesy of US taxpayers' money, of course. The comment thread is packed with trolls and idiots professing trust in the story. the Russians also expelled 3 EU diplomats for participating in the demonstrations even while Borrell and Lavrov were talking. This is when the proverbial bovine excreta hit the fan, at least in EU whose “watchdog media” (here I use the term “watchdog” as meaning “immediately barking at anybody daring to stray from the official propaganda line”) went crazy and accused Borrel of caving in to the Russians. Some even demanded Borrel’s resignation. As for Borrel himself, he did what all western officials do after a visit to Moscow: he changed his tune as soon as he came back home. Finally, Maria Zakharova, the spokeswoman for the Russian Foreign Ministry, added that “The task [of Borrell] was to carry out a public flogging, which, I think, they planned very carefully, it was a cascade of topics: talks about rallies, talks about journalists, and making [Alexey] Navalny the main theme of the discussion”. According to Zakharova, this plan failed because Russia insisted on discussing the “real issues“.
Interestingly, the Russians did not expel any US diplomats (at least not yet) in spite of the fact that these officials all agreed that the origin of the PSYOP was from overseas and in spite of the quasi-certainty that US officials must have been present, at least in the Moscow and Saint Petersburg protests. To its credit, the US embassy in Moscow did recommend to all US citizens that they stay away from illegal demonstrations. This is an ongoing crisis and by the time this analysis is posted, things might have changed dramatically. My purpose today is not to look at the US or the EU, but at what I believe is a major shift in Russian policy. At this point, we should not see the expulsions of the 3 EU diplomats as anything more than just a “shot across the bow”, a way to indicate that the winds have changed. But these expulsions are not big enough to qualify as a real, painful, retaliation. Why? Because the real slap in the collective face of the EU was the press conference of Lavrov and Borrel in which Lavrov was truly uniquely direct and candid. For example, Lavrov bluntly said ” We are proceeding from the assumption that the EU is not a reliable partner, at least at the current stage. I hope that in future strategic attention will be given to the EU’s fundamental interest in its closest neighbours and that the talks we have held today will promote movement to a more constructive trajectory. We are ready for this“. Translated from diplospeak into plain English, this means 1) we are fed up with you and 2) we don’t need you. This blunt statement is what triggered all the subsequent hysterics in Brussels about Borrel being ill treated by the Russians and Borrel’s subsequent declaration that “Russia does not want a constructive dialog” and that the EU must now decide if it still wants to get closer to Russia or if it wants to distance itself from a country slipping into authoritarianism. [Sidebar: in western parlance the degree of “democratism” or “authoritarianism” is solely defined by the willingness of a country to be a satrapy of the Empire. Under this definition, all sovereign countries are “dictatorships” and all AngloZionist satrapies are paragons of democracy.] Has the Russian bear had enough? Just two weeks ago I wrote that With “Biden” in the White House, the Kremlin Now Needs to Change Gear and I believe that this is exactly what we are seeing today. Here is my evidence: These are just a few examples of a much longer list of changes which are taking place before our eyes. So far, the EU did not get the message at all. At least officially. But witnessing the infighting taking place not only over Borrel’s trip, but also about what to do about vaccines (The Lancet has just posted a major article entitled “Sputnik V COVID-19 vaccine candidate appears safe and effective” which basically said that all the western nonsense about Sputnik-V being BOTH 1) unsafe AND 2) ineffective were lies) I can clearly see that the EU rulers are seriously worried. Right now it sure looks like the EU is losing the “COVID propaganda war” and that all these russophobic states (except the hardcore nutcases of 3B+PU) will have to now ask Russia for her vaccines. So far the only official EU reaction was to expel 3 Russian diplomats and somewhat protest. But these are clearly the opening shots of a much longer confrontation between Russia and the EU. The crucial factor to consider here is this: while the aggregate power of the US+NATO+EU+5EYES is bigger than Russia’s, the mental paralysis of the EU leaders makes the EU alone already much weaker than Russia. Of course, since Biden’s administration is a who’s who of the most hysterical russophobes imaginable, chances are that the US will interfere and attempt to back the anti-Russian factions in the EU. Considering the tone used by Russian officials over the latest USN provocations in the Black Sea and the Sea of Japan, I don’t doubt the Kremlin’s determination to act both in words and with actions. And then there are the subtle threats which the general public is rarely exposed to. The latest example is a highly specialized article entitled “Rationale for the combat use of aviation to disrupt an integrated massive air strike during a multi-domain operation of the enemy” which explains how Russia could disrupt and defeat a NATO attack. I won’t go into all the (very interesting) details here, but I will just say that the authors declare that Russia can go from a policy of deterrence by nuclear forces to a policy of (conventional) deterrence by having the means to “inflict comprehensive defeat (upon NATO countries) using all types of weapons within the deterrence of inflicting an unacceptable complex defeat on it with all types of weapons within the framework of preventive actions under the conditions of the danger of local war threatening the Russian Federation“. In truth, this is not the only Russian specialized article discussing the future of warfare, and what makes this one truly unique is that RT, of all places, decided to post an article about it entitled “Russian Air Force experts publish plan to neutralize NATO forces in all-out war with bombing strikes“. This really looks like the Kremlin wanted to make absolutely sure that western politicians (as opposed to western military analysts who read that stuff on a daily basis anyway) would think long and hard about what US military plans for NATO really would mean for the EU. Then there is the outcome of the Polish military command staff exercise Winter-20 which resulted in, I kid you not, Russia completely defeating the Polish military in 5 days only! (For details, see here, here or here). Again, there is nothing really new here, the US and/or NATO have conducted plenty of exercises which had the “Russian hordes” defeating the “forces of democracy and progress”. And, again, the real difference was in the Russian coverage of this news: for the first time the Russians openly made fun of NATO and of the (always paranoid and insanely russophobic) Poles. In truth, the Russians always knew that the Polish military is as good on pompous ceremonies and parades as it is inept on the battlefield, but that kind of open contempt is something new, at least from the state supported media. So far, the EU clearly is not coming to terms with this new reality. The latest (breathtakingly stupid) EU plan to try to scare “Putin” (here “Putin” is the collective Kremlin boogeyman, not necessarily VVP): Svetlana Tikhanovskaia has appealed to the wife of Navalnyi, Iulia, to become the “she president of Russia”. Yes, seriously. Iulia Navalnaia as President of Russia! As for Navalnyi’s supporters in the EU, they have decided to create a Russian government in exile. Again, this is not a joke. By the way, the “Minister of Foreign Affairs” of this “Russian Government in Exile”, Leonid Volkov, initially declared that the illegal riots should be halted, only to be told otherwise by his handlers. He immediately made a required 180 and declared that protests will resume. This is how Maria Zakharova bluntly, and very officially, reacted on Facebook to his “change of mind”: (minimally fixed machine translation) NATO doubles down On February 4, 2021, Volkov declared that the protests in Russia were canceled and will resume in the spring and summer. “We will not hold a rally next weekend…The wave of protest must end at a high point. Because if we continue to decline, it will be terribly demotivating and frustrating for everyone… We will prepare well and hold something big both in the spring and in the summer. We will never give up our demands.” Then, on February 9, 2021, Volkov changed his mind and announced that the campaign will continue in February. “We’ll make it much trickier” he added. What happened between February 4 and 9 and forced the “opposition” to radically change tactics? Everything is quite simple – on February 8, 2021, an online meeting with Volkov and Ashurkov took place at the Permanent Mission of Poland to the EU in Brussels, in which EU countries, the United States, and Britain took part. And in fact-this was a meeting of the NATO countries. The NATO members instructed the “opposition”, and in fact their agents of influence, how to continue “more cunning” to conduct subversive work. Too much money and resources have already been invested by the West in this story to wait until spring. They clearly understand: in the spring, the information campaign pumped up by Westerners will be blown away. They can no longer juggle the topic of “chemical weapons” without presenting the facts – they are pinned to the wall. So they double down. As for Navalnyi and his supporters, Zakarova was even more direct, saying “stop calling them opposition, they are NATO agents!” And, just to make sure that the Empire can win the battle for the “hearts and minds” of the Russian people, the Brits are now counting (again) on Pussy Riot to release a song in support of protests. Again, while this does sound like a joke, it is not. Now comes the best part: there are a lot of signs that the EU will, again under the pious pretext of “solidarity” follow the 3B+PU politicians and, if not recognize such a government in exile, at least treat its members as real officials. That is also supposed to also terrify the Kremlin, I guess. But if that is the best the EU can come up with, VVP and the people of Russia, can sleep in peace. So where do we go from here? Making predictions is a tricky thing when dealing with both 1) countries with limited agency/sovereignty and 2) countries led by incompetent/delusional politicians. The many theories of deterrence out there all assume what is called a “rational actor” and a truly sovereign state. What is certain is that the Empire and its EU protectorates will only increase what I call “petty harassment measures” to try to offend and humiliate Russia (stuff like this crap). In response to such “ankle biting” Russia will do two things: drop any pretense of diplomacy and denounce these “ankle bites” for what they are (provocations) and further turn to Zone B (aka “reliable partners”) for partnerships. Russia will also bluntly spell out to the Europeans the risks they are taking with their ill-conceived sabre rattling along the Russian border. Sadly, this probably means that, just as the Chinese Navy recently, the Russian Aerospace Forces and Navies will have order to engage any aircraft or vessel threatening Russia (so far these are only rumors, but they are persistent and seem to have strong backing in the Duma). This is a very dangerous development as western politicians, being primarily ideological (and, therefore, delusional) creatures will always prefer to play a game of (headless) chicken hoping that the other guy will back down. The fact that the “other guy” (both Russian and Chinese) in the past did, indeed, back down and show restraint only further encourages western politicians to double down forever no matter what. For these reasons I would call the probability of an actual military clash between US/NATO and/or Russia/China as “likely in 2021”. As for the future of NS2, I always assumed that EU politicians can count their Euros and realize that the EU needs that project way more than Russia. Frankly, I am not so sure now: counting on the mental abilities of a headless chicken is probably not a good idea! Neither is counting on the courage of the type of politicians whom Boris Johnson once called “supine invertebrate protoplasmic jellies“. It appears that Russia and the EU are on a direct collision course. Frankly, I welcome it, in spite of the obvious dangers. Why? Because nothing except a real confrontation can bring EU politicians down to the real world back from the La-La land they currently live in. The Russian bear needs to smack down the headless chicken. Hard. —The Saker Comments Sampler (Original thread) on February 09, 2021 · at 10:02 pm EST/EDT Jay Roach In 1946 the Council on Foreign Relations decides to create a “United Europe”, ie. the European Union. A step by step approach is applied, as after Hitlers New World Order, Europe was in no mood for another “association”. The bankers therefore use war hero General George Marshall to introduce “The European Recovery Program”, which quickly becomes known as “The Marshall Plan”. A total of 17 billion dollars of bribery money is offered to Europe as a loan on condition Europe creates an 18 member “Organization for European Economic Cooperation”, which ostensibly was a supervising body whose aim was to ensure that the money was not misappropriated, but which in reality was as administrative body for the future European Union. Only 15 % of the 17 billion dollars was payed back to the US, which generously “forgets” the rest. The Saker mentions infighting. It would have been strange if this heterogeneous “institution” did not see any infighting, bearing in mind you also have infighting in every EU state. The leadership of every EU state is now torn between loyalty to Brussels and Washington and loyalty to their own national interests. How did EU proposals for immigration quotas go down in EU countries ? You had downright “insubordination” and demonstrations in the streets. The fact that the EU is the civilian component of NATO does not help things. For example, back in 2014 Yanukovich was overthrown in Kiev due to combined subversive activities of both NATO and the EU. Back in 2014 a poll conducted in EU countries discovered that 2/3 of people did not wish to see their countries stay in the EU. That number must have increased in the years that followed. A few years back analysts have stated that a day will come when a rift will occur between European and US elites. I think this inevitable. Creepy Joe Biden in the White House will give a helping hand. He was placed in the White House so that the neocons can continue with their globalist policies, the chief targets being Russia, China and Iran. The EU will be used as backup, and initially it will respond. However, the question is if this response will last any length of time. I think not. Russia is in the neighborhood, while the US is on the other side of the Atlantic. Thanks to US initiated sanctions against Russia, the EU lost 100 billion euros in trade by the second half of 2016. Politics is politics but business is business. According to one analyst, even the British Government some years back conducted covert talks in Moscow on the possibility of Britain joining the Euro-Asian Economic Union. I don’t know how accurate that statement was, but I would not be surprised if it was true. on February 09, 2021 · at 9:10 pm EST/EDT The “war” will be 36 hours and Ukraine will cease to exist. This is from VVP and the Russian Military assuring their neighbor what will happen. It won’t be called a war. It will be called Nation-Stateicide. Similar to Suicide by Cops. Ukraine knows it will lose and fast. What it doubts is that it will be total, permanent and incredibly just. Dave, for God’s sake, get your head out of the sand! Katerina you should get your head out of the sand. Ukraine has developed some advanced cruise missiles (on par with Russia’s cruise missiles) which can bypass air defenses and target Moscow. That is Ukraine’s insurance for securely “liberating” their lost territory without retalliation from Russia. Russia not responding would mean the end of Russia, Russia responding would mean a large scale war in Europe. Ukraine will definitely (try to) “liberate” their lost territory. Croatia did it successfully without retalliation from Serbia. Croatia is Ukraine’s example and Ukraine is much better prepared. dave As for Ukrainian cruise missiles which can bypass Russian air defenses and strike Moscow, perhaps you would like to name these Ukrainian ‘wonder weapons’, which I never heard of. Can they really bypass the S-300, S-350, S-400 and S-500 missile systems, not to mention all the others ? In think not. What you have written has no bases in reality. Any Ukrainian attack against Russia would be suicidal for Ukraine. Cruise missiles cannot be taken out by sam systems because they hug the terrain, fly below the radar and fly a zig zag pattern, cruise missiles can only be detected at the very last moment when it is too late just before the fatal moment, for that maybe Pantsi S-2 might help because these systems respond real quick when a cruise missile shows up at the last moment. Example is the Iranians shoot down of a Boeing because they thought a cruise missile showed up out of nowhere at the last moment, they had to respond real quick or they or another target would be taken out by the cruise missile within mere seconds. yes… like the cruise missile attack on Siria they launched about 100 tomahawks… these Cruise Missiles where State of The Art Uncle Sam Systems… off course we all know about the Technological capabilities of the Ukraine. Russians are trembling in fear of such an attack. A pertinent question: If Ukraine attacks and perhaps severely damages Moscow, would that end the war in Ukraine’s favor? Would Russia surrender at that point? Or would Russia respond with a fury never before seen on this planet? Ukraine should think this through before proceeding. @ Russia not responding would mean the end of Russia, Russia responding would mean a large scale war in Europe. Heads I win tails you lose is not a viable diplomatic strategy. “Ukraine has developed some advanced cruise missiles which can target Moscow. That is Ukraine’s insurance” Sounds to me like the Samson Option. Or Hitler’s last dream — piss off the Russians then commit suicide. Which President sold that insurance to the Ukrainians? Can they get their money back if they don’t feel like attempting suicide? “The cowardly no-good German people were unworthy of my genius. I should have led the Russians, they are the real Supermen” — Last words of Adolf Hitler. Can you please provide a source for this quote? I am curious. Look-down shoot down radars were fielded by the Soviet Union over 40 years ago and have only gotten more effective. Cruise missiles, assuming that they were able to escape destruction before launch would be tracked by said radar or detected by satellite followed by a quick interception. https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/2714101 Look-down/shoot-down radars have been enhanced with electronic programmes that process the radar image and search for moving objects, which are detected by looking for Doppler shifts in the radar return. The radar removes all static and slow moving objects (e.g. the ground, buildings, automobiles) from the display, and shows only moving objects. Since the radar is linked to the aircraft’s fire control system, it can provide targeting information to weapons once it has detected a moving object. Look-down/shoot-down radars provide a combat aircraft with the ability to engage targets flying below them. This is highly desirable, as it allows an aircraft to detect and attack targets whilst maintaining the tactically advantageous position conferred by superior altitude. Most modern fighter aircraft possess look-down/shoot-down capable radars. Happy to burst your bubble. dave @B.F. Ukraine developed some advanced terrain hugging cruise missiles that can target Moscow. They are not that stupid you know, afterall Russians and Ukrainians have the same ancestors. You should not underestimate them. dave @B.F. @Katerina Have a look at the following two videos: I seriously doubt the Ukranazi coup regime wants to be rendered extinct, which will happen if they target Moscow. To B.F. My dear, do not waste your time replying to this “dave”, he is one of these – either absolutely delusional or a troll. His response to my comment is very telling. So, my advice – do not bother. I certainly wouldn’t any more. Cheers. It appears he lives in his own reality. This is going off-topic everyone and just being personal. Any further commentary will go to trash. Mod. The past week has seen the ATO taking casualties by snipers and unexplained explosions, and an escalation by Kiev has been expected for months.. The last few days has seen intense shelling north of Donetsk..(see Colonel Cassad’s live journal).
I think the same. Shutting down those TV channels in preparation for escalation in the east. People say no… this will never happen it would be suicidal etc..but we are dealing with leadership that are irrational deluded, war-mongerers. As they face total economic collapse and hyperinflation they need a war…which of course they (the political leaders) will watch from afar.. Serbian girl: Your point on irrational warmongers is concerning and accurate-not only in Kiev but in wash dc with the zionists in control, no one ever accused them of being rational: e.g. nuland, blinken, sullivan, depend on those clowns as seeing a possible opportunity to use kiev and its cannon fodder to apply pressure on Russia. Nuland is on record in the obummer admin as saying the baltics and ukraine are the first line of defense against Russian threats and “aggression.” Think about the lunacy of that view. Finally, hard line from the Saker. Yes, Russia has exhausted its patience. And the limp wrists and pedophiles of Brussels need a physical ass-kicking. I expect the Norse actually think they can establish gains in the North and Arctic Dreams of Russia will melt like the permafrost. They are being bolstered of late by the mighty USAF. They might try something very stupid soon. Poland is always up for trouble. They, with their nazi progeny in Ukraine, certainly might test Belarus or Donbass. We know the witless Brits and midget in high heels Macron would like to take a piece of Russian hide, so they may concoct something “headless” on their own. EU as a unit can never muster the pretense of an alliance. NATO is an engineless tank. Without US leading them, they go nowhere. I’m thinking Luxembourg will be set up as the provocateur. A drone with their markings will be sent to the front. The calculation being Russia wouldn’t pounce on such a tiny state, would they? Europe is such a joke, we really do need Peter Sellers to lead them. Just look at how they have negotiated with China over trade balancing and 5G. They are in a terrible way over trade. They wanted Iran as their big market. That’s not happening. Israel will bring down their governments if the EU invests in Iran. The US wants the EU economy subservient. Another bad thing for Brussels. And they gave away Russia over sanctions to back the Ukies, war criminals and sex slavers. Italy is on its 150th government, Paris is in flames most weekends. And these clowns are poking the Bear. When does the comedy end? When the Bear pisses on the fires Brussels sets in their own capitals. They are desperate to promote some conflict in order to label Russia an aggressor. The same as the US is trying to do with China in the East. Whichever dolt starts with Russia will get more than a spanking. Whether it is a tactical nuke warhead is doubtful. But a hypersonic or agile cruise missile like Kalibr will definitely be the stroke. And if the West rolls tanks anywhere toward Mother, salvos of missiles will end the EU and NATO. The EU has not wanted to be neighbors with Russia. They have tried everything to destroy Russia except kinetic war. So, Zone A, headless as they are, looks like it wants to try the last option. I think of two lessons they haven’t learned from recent news. When the Ukies were sold on the idea of trying to send a boat to the Azov without permission. They got rammed and captured and it became a comedy short. Then, the final terrorists in Chechnya responsible for the massive bombing in Moscow were hunted down and all eliminated. The Russians never forget, never back down, always eliminate the threat. 2021 is going to be damn interesting as the Europeans try one more time to harm Russia. We know the headless chickens are going to be quartered and fried. If you have Euros, switch to another currency. The future is dark for the Euro. The West is running out of time and is extremely neurotic. The devil has them now, but I hope not for much longer. It’s coming to an end. In 5, at most 10, years one can expect the outcome of considerable changes, most likely going through major historical turmoils, which will probably escalate soon. While in the last 20-30 years the west did everything short of a kinetic war, they have organized large-scale wars against Russia in the past and that didn’t work well for them. They probably at least suspect that now Russia is stronger than ever and nothing can be achieved. It’s actually quite clear that any attack against Russia will result in a catastrophic event of an existential magnitude for the attacking party. The “partners” have the desire but lack the resource and courage for any war. Who would be fighting that war? Yet, it is always possible that they are crazy enough and it is likely that they will try to stir something in Ukraine and Syria. “Defense Minister Shoigu has just announced a major increase in the production of high-precision and hypersonic weapons.” Considering the Russian way of exporting national security information, this most likely means that the production increase have been ongoing for some time or (almost) complete already. Unfortunately, I don’t align with Saker’s general optimistic stance that in several years/decades improvement will come to the US. I think that the US will cease to exist altogether. It’s hard to compare Eastern European outcomes with those in the US, since I cannot see where the US can possibly gain this cultural resilience to survive through the incoming major catastrophe. That’s unfortunate in many ways, since it would mean suffering, but we cannot really do anything at this point. on February 10, 2021 · at 8:14 am EST/EDT 12 hrs, then they screem Uncle! Precission missiles will not take 36 hrs to neuter the Ukrane, it’ll be over in a matter of minutes. Cheers, M [premium_newsticker id="211406"] The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post
[this analysis was written for the Unz Review]
Germany's chancellor leads the disnformation parade against Moscow. What gives?
JENS STOLTENERG, NATO CHIEF, SHAMELESS US PUPPET and WARMONGER, DISCHARGES HIS ASSIGNED ROLE IN THE LATEST PSYOP AGAINST MOSCOW.
(Let's call things by their true names.)
Sept 7, 2020
As I have explained many times, western politicians double down not when they feel strong, they double down when they feel weak and when they place their hopes in the willingness of the other side not to seriously further escalate.
Yes, the US does control Europe, at least for the time being. The Saker has stated that “The EU has a major problem: it is run by a comprador class which is entirely dependent on the United States”. That is correct for the simple reason that the EU is an American creation, or more specifically a creation of Anglo-American bankers who wanted to curtail the sovereign status of European states. The EU is based on the American Federation, and created as follows:
In 1957 the Organization creates the Common Market, which leads to the creation of the European Union in 1993 and the mess in which Europe has found its self today.
Rabid dogs have no other ending than termination.
Croatia never won back “it’s” territories using military means. When the Croatian attack began in 1995 against the Republic of Serbian Krayina, it’s demoralized troops performed poorly. It was the Serbs who went on the counterattack, after which they were stopped and ordered to retreat. Serbia never interfered, because back then it did not have Russian backing, and we all know the state of Russia under Yeltsin. The Croatian “victory” was a political one, not a military one.
of which:
about 30 fell off the sky… I Wonder why?
about 30 loss their GPS connection and landed somewhere in the Dessert… I Wonder why?
about 30 hit a Building, the same building! … I Wonder why?
the rest malfunctioned or where shot down SAM and AA defenses
The Ukraine has strengthened ? In what way ? Yes, NATO gave it some sophisticated weapons. However, that means almost nothing. It has a demoralized conscript Army, where the bulk of conscripts don’t wish to fight. It can only rely on neo-Nazis of the Right Sector, and their fighting qualities are questionable, as they prefer fighting civilians. As for the Donbass, it’s troops and equipment are dug in. Should Ukraine attack, it’s Army will be in the open while the Russians of the Donbass will be concealed. Finally, any Ukrainian attack risks provoking huge repercussions inside Ukraine, whose population has been impoverished, and which certainly does not want to see any more war.
You have not answered my question. Kindly name these Ukrainian ‘wonder weapons’. I presume NATO has bought them from Ukraine, or has it ?
The Russian Military put it in black and white and Shoigu told them hypersonic missiles will be mass-produced. The nonsense of the last 25 years is over.
I’ve seen street fights back in my day. They are never pretty, always one side gets pulverized.
I think (for the comedy sound track) they should all plead mercy in Russian.
YOU ARE FREE TO REPRODUCE THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED YOU GIVE PROPER CREDIT TO THE GREANVILLE POST
VIA A BACK LIVE LINK.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
