By The Saker
October 20, 2021
“This is like a suitcase without a handle: it’s too heavy to carry, but it would a shame to throw it away”
—Russian saying
So the US Minister of Imperial Wars (aka “Secretary of Defense”) visited Georgia, the Ukraine and Romania. Then he will go to the NATO HQ. Is there a logic here? After all, what is the value of these countries to the AngloZionist Empire?
Nominally, these are all “US allies” (aka colonies) but whose real value is close to zero. Let me explain:
- The armed forces of these countries are sub-useless, especially against the Asiatic hordes of Putin’s Mordor.
- Forward deploying US forces simply put them closer to Russian standoff weapons which gives Russia more options (weapons systems or other) to obliterate them.
Some might wonder whether the US can protect these, uh, protectorates. Nope! According to General Hodges, former NATO commander, the US has only one Patriot battalion in all of Europe, in Germany, protecting the US forces in Ramstein. Now, just for the record again:
- Patriots were useless against Iraq’s Scud missiles during the Gulf War.
- Patriots could not even stop rather simple Houthi missiles.
- Patriots are not even theoretically capable of stopping hypersonic weapons.
So what in the world is Uncle Shmuel thinking?
At the very least, he knows that the so-called “Russian threat” is utter bullshit to feed the Eurocretins.
Here is my hypothesis: Europe, all of it, is the proverbial suitcase with no handle: you can’t carry the damn thing, but you don’t want to throw it away either.
What would you do with such a suitcase?
I would do three things:
- Take out the most valuable contents (say jewelry).
- Use the less valuable on the spot (say perishable foods).
- Toss the rest away.
But what if you could do better than toss it away?
What if you could use the rest of that suitcase to, say, burn down the house of your worst enemy?
A perfect example of such a suitcase would not only be Europe, but Zelenskii. Not only did he brownnose Trump, which the Dems will never forgive, but he has now totally lost control of the situation inside the Ukraine and has zero legitimacy (the US alphabet soup now runs the country via the (un-elected and officially advisory only) Ukie NSDC which now has total control over the country which, by the way, has about 6’000 political prisoners nobody in the West seems to notice!.
So why not use him and the Ukraine as a firestarter?
Now just look at what the Anglos have been, and are still doing, in Europe:
- The UK ditched the EU.
- The Anglos are consolidating worldwide (5 Eyes, AUKUS, etc.).
- The US is demanding that the EU freeze this winter while the US exports its promised “molecules of freedom” to Far-East Asia and then places the blame on Putin!
- US forces are constantly, almost on a daily basis, coming very near or even across (quickly) Russia’s borders in the air, land and sea.
- The rhetoric from Congress and the White House to the US colonies is “we will back you, we are with you, we love you, we will help you” (all legally vague and even meaningless categories, by the way).
Now remember the 08.08.08 war?
Georgia under Saakashvili was not used to meaningfully attack Russia, only to force Russia to intervene. Which she did, two days late, and she won in 3 more days. But politically, even TODAY western politicians (US Minister of Imperial Wars recently) declared that Russia was the culprit and that she occupied Georgia. And the entire menagerie of scatophages in Europe repeats this nonsense even though the official EU investigation declared that Georgia attacked first (murdering Russian peacekeepers in the process).
The truth is that the US economy and society are in terrible shape, the US cannot afford to “carry” the EU or the official NATO-wannabes “suitcase” any further. Whatever Victoria “fuck the EU” Nuland wanted to achieve in Moscow clearly gave zero results. As for the EU itself, it is falling apart even faster than the US (immigration, crime, COVID and lockdowns, etc.).
So here is my hypothesis:
The US wants to trigger a war in Europe, but a war limited to its most useless and subservient colonies, especially Ukraine. In order to not risk being nuked, sunk or hypersonically decapitated, the US is now showing Russia that it still has (some) teeth left, so “don’t mess with us”. The implication is exactly what April Glaspie said to the Iraqis before the Gulf War: “don’t touch the KSA, but we don’t care about Kuwait“. We all know how this ended.
This is probably what Victoria Nuland offered Putin during her trip to Moscow: take eastern Ukraine, leave the rest and we won’t interfere beyond verbal protests.
The delusional US colonies in the Black Sea region are now dreaming of a triangle “Georgia, the Ukraine, Romania” but only they, not the Russians, take that nonsense that seriously (the Russians know they can swat down these pretend states’ armed forces in 24 hours). But the point is that these colonies do buy it all, especially the Ukrainians (watching their TV shows is hilarious).
Now here is my guess how the Russians see it:
- The US will never go to war over its colonies in Europe.
- The US is threatening Russia to try to show her that the Russians should not strike the US forces directly should their “Black Sea triangle” colonies trigger a war with Russia.
- The US border provocations’ sole aim is to show the Ukronazis that the US will fly its “mighty bombers and mighty missiles” (all outdated, but nevermind that) if they attack Russia. But since the US has zero legal obligations, they won’t do any of that when/if such a war starts.
- The US colonies can be militarily easily swatted down like the scatophage flies which they are.
- Russia does not want, or need, any such wars, if only for its immense political costs.
- Russia does not want to pay for fixing the Ukraine, which she can’t afford anyway.
- If the Ukronazis force Russia to openly intervene, she will go no further than liberating the eastern and southern provinces of the Ukraine (i.e those regions which are populated by Russians).
In the past, the Ukraine and Russia have been at the brink of war many times, that is just the latest iteration of the same principles. However, each time the Ukronazis are more and more desperate while the US keeps reassuring them more and more. Eventually, this quantitative change will result in a qualitative one.
What about the EU then?
Let’s separate it into a few subcategories:
- Wannabe NATO members (Georgia, the Ukraine, Bosnia, etc.)
- Useless NATO members (3B, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria)
- Germany (which is a category by itself)
- Real NATO members (northern NATO countries)
- Kinda useful NATO members (France and southern European countries)
Countries in group one are de facto NATO members and de facto totally expendable.
Countries in group two are de jure NATO members, but highly expendable.
Germany is under NATO occupation, but it is vital to the EU. If Germany crashes economically, that would weaken the entire EU, which is exactly what the US wants. Furthermore, while German politicians are pathetic slaves, the German business community is very powerful, they even forced Merkel to defend NS2 at the immense rage of both the nutcases in the eastern EU and even Uncle Shmuel himself. Germany must be brought down to heel and severely punished.
Countries in group four will be protected by three factors: distance, non-direct involvement and the US military (they are the jewels in the suitcase).
Countries in group five have always been seen with contempt and disdain by northern Europeans and, even more so, the Anglos. Plus, they are, potentially, the most disloyal to Uncle Shmuel. So they don’t really matter anymore.
How about Turkey then?
That is a more complex case. Turkey does definitely have a Pan-Turkic and Neo-Ottoman agenda. But Erdogan will never forgive or forget that the US tried to overthrow and kill him. Furthermore, Turkey is a NATO member and tries to use NATO as a counter-weight to powerful Russia on its north. But Erdogan is not stupid, he knows that the “core Europeans” will never accept Turkey as a real EU member. He also needs Russian assistance to minimize Turkey’s dependence on western military technologies. Hence what I would call “Erdogan’s rope walk”: yes, it is very dangerous, but he has no other option.
Let’s imagine a post-war EU will look like if all goes exactly according to Anglo plans:
- The eastern Ukraine and part of the Ukrainian coast are liberated by Russia.
- The leftover Ukraine becomes politically consolidated around Ukronazi nutcases (Hungary and Poland might even take a tasty bite off that leftover Banderastan).
- The Europeans will be further terrified out of their (already minuscule wits) and accept anything from the Empire in exchange for NATO “protection”.
- NATO will “prove” to itself and the world that is very indispensable indeed.
- The US MIC gets to get even more money for its high-tech toys (even if they are militarily useless).
Now let’s remember what the purpose of NATO was according to its first secretary general: “keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.” Let’s update it and say “keep the Russians out economically and politically, the Americans in forever and ever, and the Germans punished and subdued“.
The true function of Germany has been to artificially keep the Poles and the 3B afloat by huge money influxes (via the EU). But the Germans need to understand that their disobedience about NS2 will not be tolerated by their Anglo masters.
How about Russia in all this?
- Her easy military victory will come at immense political costs
- She will have to fix the eastern and southeastern Ukraine (with what money?).
- Her territorial gains will give her absolutely nothing: there are no needed natural or other resources in the Ukraine – its formerly modern industry is gone, millions of smart and well educated Ukrainian have already emigrated to Russia (and millions of dumb ones to the EUE) this is a deindustrialized, failed state which will become Russia’s suitcase with no handle!
- The Russian economy will suffer, which will, in turn, affect the political scene inside Russia at a time when the issue of a successor for Putin is becoming, if not quite acute yet, then certainly impossible to ignore either.
- Potentially pro-Russian (or, at least, not anti-Russian) countries and political forces in western Europe will be crushed by the AngloZionist propaganda.
Yes, and again, yes, NATO and the US are militarily paper tigers, but the scenario above does not require them to have any kind of effective military forces (other than a functioning nuclear triad, which the US still has as an “insurance policy” for US imperial wars in case they go south, which they always do).
So what can Russia do about this?
- She can become the world’s most powerful military. Done.
- She cannot convince anybody in the “firestarter states” that they will be incinerated, these states are hopeless, so let their own karma take care of them.
- Ditto for the useless NATO members because due to their blind and hysterical patriotism, they will always think that they matter, and even matter a lot. De-convincing them of this delusion would destroy their entire identity and historiography.
- She should talk to the German business community because the Germans are not stupid or hopeless, and they have the most to lose in such a situation. But (politely) ignore the German politicians until Germany de-occupies and Germany recovers her sovereignty.
- Withdraw from all EU and EU-related organizations.
- Ignore the real NATO member states because they will remain without agency until Germany itself becomes free again.
- Openly support the (comparatively) mentally sane countries in southern Europe and the Balkans.
- Talk directly to the USA and explain, very bluntly, that there will be hell to pay for them too, that Russia does not need a nuclear strike to seriously hurt an already dead empire run by an equally dead USA going on momentum only. This blunt tone will become even more effective if it is heard from both Russia AND China (which it now is).
Can the list above prevent a war? No, not if the decision is made by the US to set its firestarters aflame and “fuck the EU”.
Could Russia do more, better?
This is now a question I address to you by opening the floor for discussions.
—Andrei
Select Comments
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors.
YOU ARE FREE TO REPRODUCE THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED YOU GIVE PROPER CREDIT TO THE GREANVILLE POST VIA A BACK LIVE LINK.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
[premium_newsticker id="211406"]
Don't forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days.
The only thing that comes to mind is that the bankers have so thoroughly raped the USD that the only way out they see is causing so much chaos and destruction that what’s left of the middle classes will not take revenge.
This would explain why they are gutting the US military by forcing the jab: they are an internal threat. A core of lower level patriot officers and soldiers could take them out, if they were organized enough. By removing the competent and principled soldiers that organization becomes much more difficult.
So that’s the plan, like a business that has failed due to embezzlement, burn it down and collect the insurance.
The rapists simply want to destroy enough that they can live to rape another day, without fear of their victims striking back. Their fixation on very large yachts, personal bunkers, and isolated land in safe places like New Zealand speaks to their intentions.
Looks like war is imminent. Karma strikes again!
Prayers and blessings to all for safety and good health.
Stephen
The solution to the finances needed when the East and Southwest Ukraine return to Russia is quite logical. China gets a 50 year lease alolng the Azov shoreline and some of the Black Sea portage (Odessa).
They will build tourist resorts and industries and develop with tourism traffic from China. They will also park a PLAN ship or two in the neighborhood to “integrate” security of the Black Sea.
China wanted to help develop Krim. She also wanted to put casinos in. That was rejected by Moscow.
But to change the Nazi and Khazarian culture completely, bring in the Chinese and their money.
It’s another form of FDI (foreign direct investment) and it will put China into position to change Eastern Europe also.
From Mariupol to Odessa, various Chinese separate locales where nothing much exists right now.
It will draw in Georgia and Moldova to the Russian sphere, and block Turkey’s influence.
Shipbuilding would be increased, coal exports, and vast agriculture and modern food processing could be just some of the non-tourist industries to immediately benefit.
And Russia just has to stand by and collect export and import fees and income taxes on the new wealth produced. Those revenues will cover social security for the population gained.
To Larchmonter
I think we need to send two letters – one to Margarita and another one to Russia’s Ministry of Development! : )
Cheers!
And more to the Russian Foreign Ministry too 🙂
Sounds like a good plan!
It is my honest opinion nothing in the US-EU power balance will change significantly until the big shots in the Vatican – by which I mean the institution, not every Roman Catholic out there – in relation to its liaison with European aristocracy, stops seeing the United States as the bastion of Christendom (against Muslims, against pagan commies Chinese etc). Otherwise, Europe will always be a lesser partner.
Andrei, I respectifully disagree….
Russia can pay for anything with the Rouble. She could increase the value of the Rouble tomorrow via the simple expedient of demanding Roubles for her exports, and refusing to pay for imports with anything but the Rouble.
China can be accommodated via currency swap arrangements.
Geo-politically, NovoRossia must be re-created. They can be used as proxies to take everything east of the Bug plus the provinces of Kherson, Mikolaev, and Odessa.
NovoRossia can be the buffer needed which excludes NATO navies from North Black Sea.
Abkazia should expand south, taking all lands west of S. Ossetia, Armenia to the Turkish border.
Chechnia should take the rest of Georgia with the exception of Tiblisi, leaving that as a rump Georgia.
Russia should via counter battery fire gone wrong, destroy the gas pumping stations east of the Deniper.
As far as Nuc war goes, Russia needs to do what the PRC did in 1950… ignore the risk and get the job done.
As far as the Baltic States go… Russia should organize, equip, and fund revolutionaries to drive the Swedes into the sea, expel NATO, and take them back.
Shit happens…. it’s time Russia got on with it.
INDY
Yep, and Iran should take Azerbaijan. It’s old Persian/Iranian territory after all. And while we’re at it, why not restore Armenia to its old glory? A while back I wrote something about this here.
But seriously, don’t take any of this, well… seriously. War is horrible and most of the time righting old wrongs goes awfully, well… wrong.
US domination is waning. The process is dynamic. Gaps will be created, how to fill them for the benefit of Russia? 3 zones, Europe, Muslim World and Africa. Helping to decouple, offering win-win opportunities, Mr. Lavrov and Russian diplomats are excellent in this work.
Europe is blocked by NATO and the cowardice of European leaders. The Russian army is watching.
Contracts for arms deliveries with Turkey and Saudi Arabia have already been finalized and this is just the beginning. The Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict has been stabilized thanks to Russia. In Afghanistan the SCO is playing a leading role. The Russian intervention in Syria was a devastating blow to the empire.
Africa is fed up with the French, it would be a mistake to spare them. Helping the Africans to reduce the two axes of chaos created by the UN-US-French trio along the Congo-Nile ridge and from Somalia to the Cameroonian and Nigerian borders seems to me to hold great promise of political and economic influence for Russia in the long term. The Russians have a discreet foot in Burundi. The strategic continuity of this infernal trio has been cut in Central Africa and another French domino, Mali, is falling. Algeria is currently on the offensive and could take over the place left vacant by the assassination of Gaddafi.
Things can quickly get out of hand if one plays with war. Let's not forget that American theater commanders can now launch nukes no need to call home. That is dangerous and could be the start of something we would all regret. Imagine a NATO army of over 100,000 unable to move forward or backward with pressure increasing by the hour. The government of the troops in danger would be asking for everything and anything that could save the day. If they were British would they not launch a tactical nuke to get them out. French? Limited wars do not stay limited for long even the memory-deficient NATO leadership should know this. Russia really has nothing to prove to the west I agree the new members should be told what is in store for them if things get out of hand. That is the responsible thing to do. But I see a rapid deterioration of the political and economic situation in the United States people are questioning the leadership as it is getting worse every day. I wonder how long can the current situation continue? Perhaps it may be better to let some time go by before Russia looks to military action.
A couple of things here;
1) NATO does not have the needed forces or supplies in Europe to attack Russia. To augment them would take several months, would trigger protests in Europe and, if needed, Russia would preempt and attack (they will not repeat Saddam Hussein’s mistake which, in fact, they warned him about).
2) While in theory the theater commanders could use nukes, they would perfectly understand what would happen next, so I don’t believe they would do that without a direct order from the White House.
This being said, I agree that things could escalate VERY quickly.
Specifically, the Russians have declared that the next time some UK/US ship tries to breach the Russian maritime border they will get a torpedo, not just a warning. As far as I know, this is not an official stance, but it seems to be the unspoken consensus. BTW – there are electronic means to send that message directly to the ship command (specific radar modes and/or specific jamming).
Which will give the Anglos two basic options:
1) everything short of war
2) a counter attack
Since they are not ready for the option 2, they would probably go for option 1.
But who knows, I listened to the imbecile commanding the HMS Defender and he is clearly totally out of touch with reality.
So one thing which keeps me awake at night is my very strong suspicion that senior US/NATO commanders feel invulnerable and that their narcissistic self-worship will get the all killed.
So yes, I am afraid.
Saker, your reply to my question last week about the US being the most dangerous nation on the planet was brief but right to the point…
True, but for only two main reasons:
1) Nukes
2) The most brainwashed population on the planet
I have no idea how to defuse this reality, and it also scares me a lot.
We are, indeed, the most brainwashed population on the planet. The same folks who were the real perps of 9/11 have brainwashed us into believing the fairy tale that 19 Arabs led by Osama bin Laden attacked us on that horrible day. That was the pretext for all the US wars of this century. As Voltaire warned, “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” Like the false-flag attack of 9/11 drove the USA into the so-called War on Terror, so will a false-flag attack, this time blamed on Ukraine, Iran, Russia… whoever, drive the USA into a cataclysmic nuclear conflict that will absolutely be the end of the USA as we know it. This is all by design, Saker.
Brian,
Friend in the Brit army told me they used to exercise tactical nukes against Russian army, by allowing Russians to breakthrough, flanking north and south and wiping out all life forms in the centre. They’ve planned for war with Russia for many years. There is no question nukes would be used.
Let’s hope war never happens
Not so fast folks. Let's not forget about America’s new secret weapon !
http://www.jimstone.is/1/levine4star.jpg
Well, let’s hope that “it” will get only a glorified desk job…
But yes,
scary, very very scary…
I think the USA is in too much disarray to start anything. Team Biden is fanatical about vaxxing everyone but the anti-vaxxers are becoming more rabid as news comes in from Israel, Singapore, and Iceland that the mRNA vaxes are a failure and the death rate is going up. Numerous US military are leaving the military instead of taking the Vax.
Russia should reiterate their peaceful intentions but their ambassadors should attempt to enlighten their european hosts about how the “real revolution in military affairs” has rendered USA second rate versus Russia.
Now Bidet wants to vax the 5-11 year olds. They have virtually no risk from the covid, wheareas their mrna vax risk is very high.
It’s almost as if the US government has been taken over by an enemy that wants to take it down from inside.
An answer by military means is maybe too obvious to make it desirable. As Saker said, the Americans feel relatively safe in that respect. Besides I lack the military expertise to even make any guesses.
An asymmetric response, not necessarily in Europe offers more traction. With winter fast approaching, I’d say the best response to an attack by a lackay state such as Ukraine, but coordinated from Washington, would be to hurt Americans economically. The issue of empty stores is already pressing. Russia and China combined have the means to apply an embargo on the USA. Second, there’s the question of the middle east. America’s presence there is becoming untenable. Thirdly Russia (and China) should spare no efforts to entice German companies, offering them joint ventures in global projects. Russia and China combined control the biggest part of world’s resources and production. Russia should not wait for a turn of events to take place in Germany, but actively promote it. Let’s call it a sincere offer of much more than just gas to keep the German economy going.
Negotiate with the EU (ie Germany) to take euros in payment for gas. That would eliminate the USD gas price manipulation and be a political WMD against the US. Euro payments would also facilitate Europe-Russia trade, which will happen anyway
The US would go into full panic at the massive loss to the USD-energy pricing monopoly.
To Anonymous
I believe the trade between Russia and EU is already conducted in Euros, but expanding on the theme, Russia has one huge ACE up it’s sleeve. It can back their Ruble by gold (they have heaps of that stuff now) and at the same time demand that the payment for russian gas to EU countries to be made in Rubles! It’s called double whammy!
Then sit back and watch the eurocretins running around like headless chickens and no NATO or Uncle Shmuel would be able to help them there!