Biden’s Ukraine Blackmail
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
By Gordon Hahn
(TGP Screenshot)
U.S. President Joseph Biden and not surprisingly NATO made it evidently clear that there will be no Ukrainian membership in NATO until after the war. This stipulation and the requirement – objective and subjective – of Ukraine’s victory over Russia in the war constitutes a form of de facto blackmail of Kiev on the part of the West. This dooms Ukraine to fight ‘as long as it takes’ – in the sloganeering vernacular of the White House – to the cliched but very real last Ukrainian in order to gain NATO membership.
The Blackmail Trap
On the eve of NATO’s Vilnius summit Joseph Biden stated clearly that he had consolidated the alliance’s members around the position that it will not offer Kiev membership in NATO until after the war. Never mind that this carrot was dangled over Ukraine for additional months as war raged and Ukrainians died by the tens of thousands at the West’s behest. More importantly, this ‘decision’ (actually a long ongoing policy) means that Ukraine cannot gain NATO membership without attaining victory in the war with Russia. Why? Because a defeated Ukraine cannot become a NATO member not just from Washington’s and Brussels’ point of view but also from that of Moscow.
Anything that can be called a Russian victory objectively speaking and in Moscow’s view cannot coexist with the survival of the principle of NATO’s ‘open door policy’ and its application to Ukraine.* As long as the West and Ukraine insist on the right of Ukraine to be a member of the alliance, Russia will continue its special military operation and is likely to escalate to full-scale war. Ukraine is faced with the Hobson’s choice of continuing war – one which is eviscerating Ukraine’s landscape in every possible sense—from the economy to society to the polity (now distinctly undemocratic) to the ecology. It is being held hostage. Kiev is told that it must risk survival – though naturally the West will do everything it can ‘for as long as it takes’ – in order to achieve NATO expansion.
Thus, badly outmatched Ukraine must defeat a more powerful Russian army backed by a more powerful state than that in Ukraine. It must do so largely with its own manpower and at the sacrifice of the noted landscape. NATO assistance has been and will be unable to close the gap in the next two years at the least, and that its scuttled the March 2022 draft peace agreement and now demands Kiev keep up the good fight. Moreover, Washington and Brussels have frequently rejected the idea of talks with Moscow on the pretext that the losses of Ukrainian territory cannot be allowed to be locked in by peace with Moscow or a frozen conflict. Therefore, the fight must go on.
The War for NATO’s Right to Expand
But the fight for what really from the West’s actual standpoint, putting aside the sloganeering, propaganda, and disinformation? This war is not about Ukraine’s national security, Western security, the ‘Western way of life’, ‘Western civilization’, or ‘democracy’ (we in the West have/had republics, not democracies, hence the quotation marks). If it were truly about any of these things, Western leaders would attempt to convince their publics that, at a minimum, a war footing in industry and society must be established in order to intensify weapons, other military production, and nations’ commitment to the war effort or that, at a maximum, NATO must enter the war.
One has to feel for some of them as they see their country dissolving into dust and as they are beholden to the least humanistic and banal Western leadership cohort in history. Westerners can hang Ukrainian flags, ban Russian culture, and babble ‘Slava Ukrainu’ all they want, but history will not be fooled. It will know who exchanged Ukraine for power and money in a fake temple they called ‘democracy.’
* NATO’s ‘open door policy’ applied to Georgia, probably Moldova and certainly Kazakhstan and Mongolia will also meet with the same sore of resistance from Moscow that it has met in Ukraine. I mention the latter Asian states of Kazakhstan and Mongolia only because NATO is opening offices in Japan, opening an entire Pandora’s box of potential sceanrios for NATO’s further expansion.
https://gordonhahn.com/2023/07/18/bidens-ukraine-blackmail/
ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCEGordon M. Hahn is a researcher specializing in Islam and politics in Russia and Eurasia, international relations in Eurasia and terrorism in Eurasia. He is the author of several books and a number of research articles on Russia and the Caucasus Emirate. Hahn gives media interviews on the global Jihadist movement. Hahn's 2007 book was listed as an "Outstanding Academic Title" in Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE
Gordon M. Hahn is a researcher specializing in Islam and politics in Russia and Eurasia, international relations in Eurasia and terrorism in Eurasia. He is the author of several books and a number of research articles on Russia and the Caucasus Emirate. Hahn gives media interviews on the global Jihadist movement. Hahn's 2007 book was listed as an "Outstanding Academic Title" in Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries.
Print this article
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW
| Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin? |
[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License