314
Print this article
If you find the above COMPELLING, pass it on! Become an “influence multiplier”!
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Danny Haiphong • Scott Ritter
Resize text-+= |
Scott Ritter: GAME OVER for Victoria Nuland as Russia Destroys Neocon Agenda in Ukraine
URL has been copied successfully!
Print this article
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
If you find the above COMPELLING, pass it on! Become an “influence multiplier”!
Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Ritter is right of course. But there is more to the Nuland dismissal than just Ukraine. And that is Trump who wants cooperation with Russia as he clearly stated. US’ prestige and therefore its power is severely damaged by Ukraine and Gaza and its foreign policy needs to be reoriented towards a new neoliberalism and a more pseudo-diplomatic direction. The present cooling off is an insurance policy against Trump, to catch him at his own game and the demise of the old war horse Nuland is one of its factors.
On the other hand, it is obvious that Trump is slowly being domesticated by watering down his fictitious legal troubles (except for the enormous dollar fines in New Yok which will keep him in line). His once arousing speeches are becoming the usual political babble and thus tamed by the establishment, he will follow status quo instructions even though with some resistance. But that is good as it shows the mythical freedom of speech (but not of thought). Thus, the elites insure against social progress in a so-called oldest democracy.