RAMIN MAZAHERI
Resize text-+= |
Why is the biggest political story of our era so underreported?
"For a Europe of peoples, not multinationals", proclaims this Yellow Vests sign. Dangerous fellas, hence ruthlessly repressed.
I have returned to Paris and can report that things are as politically bleak as ever, continuing a trend which began with the rubber bullet-smashing of the Yellow Vest movement in 2019. The European Union has become truly American (which was often alleged to be the ultimate goal): it’s politically apathetic.
There are no domestic political movements to report on - the French MSM just reports on Ukraine, Israel and (as usual) ecology.
This is not as it used to be.
Prior to the six months of bloody Saturdays over 2018-19 France had seen a full decade of incredible political activism. Leftist planning agendas were full of protests, gatherings and strikes concerning: Sarkozy’s bailouts in late 2008, Hollande’s hopeful Socialist Party election, his subsequent U-turn on austerity, the forceful imposition of austerity by Brussels, the fabrication of Macron, his immediate detestation, the spectacularly unprecedented support for - and then the spectacularly unprecedented repression of - les gilets jaunes - this was a 10-year period of intense, intense activism.
Were it not for Israel’s latest and most brutal invasion of Gaza, and combined with Macron’s incredible 7-years-running refusal to interact with the press (the exact opposite of Sarkozy), I’m not sure I’d have much work to do here?
There is a story to cover, and it’s the most important one, but it’s almost impossible to cover via PressTV news reports: the obvious failure of the pan-European project.
This is the biggest political story of the 21st century, and yet it’s going undiscussed year after year. Brexit put it on the front pages, and then so did the Yellow Vests, but Euroscepticism has been suppressed for four years now.
But what’s a bigger story in the 21st century than the economic, political and confidence collapse of the biggest economic bloc in the world?
The war on the Muslim world since 9/11? That’s something, indeed, but this is the re-sundering of a region which was already suppressed by two centuries of colonialism and then neo-colonialism.
The rise of China? That was something inevitable and unstoppable, due to the superior planning and cohesion of socialist-inspired governments. Of course, China’s sudden rise was aided by the Great Financial Crisis which devastated the West, who then exacerbated it with their predictably awful, inequality-generating policies of bailouts, austerity, QE and ZIRP.
Fifteen years ago who did not expect that a united Europe, and one working in what is now clearly lockstep with the United States, would become an unstoppable project?
The alleged solution of “social democracy” goes way back to the 1890s - what we have witnessed hasn’t been the “death of communism” but the “death of social democracy” instead.
That’s the big story: that Europe has not just stopped in its tracks but stagnated, regressed, devolved, disappointed, etc. and etc.
It’s truly historical. What the demise of the pan-European project means is the end of the “social democratic” model: if any region had implemented a “third way” between liberalism and socialism it was Europe. The alleged solution of “social democracy” goes way back to the 1890s - what we have witnessed hasn’t been the “death of communism” but the “death of social democracy” instead.
What a story, no? It was as the proponents of socialist democracy always predicted: social democracy inevitably reverts back to mere liberal democracy. (Or crumbles into fascism.) It’s truly historical.
Back in the US someone recently asked me why I kept referring to the Great Financial Crisis of 2008, saying it was old history, and it made me pause. They never talk about it in the US anymore, that’s true. However, as soon as I returned to France I was confronted with multiple references to it in journalism and art. But they only get the dates right - roughly.
Yes, Europe took a more far-right economic approach (austerity) than the US (Europe had more social democracy to roll back, of course), but the problem is not the 2007-8 Great Financial Crisis nor austerity - the problem is the pan-European project itself, and this is precisely what is suppressed.
It is easy to suppress, or just be confused, because the timelines are so similar: the pan-European project didn’t truly begin until the undemocratic passage of the Lisbon Treaty of 2009, which was forced through thanks to the chaos surrounding the Great Financial Crisis and subsequent European Debt Crisis (starting 2009).
Why has nobody kept referring to the Lisbon Treaty of 2009? I am definitely one of the very few journalists who do. Now that the UK is out the Anglophone world doesn’t care, I suppose.
The 15-year summation of the pan-European can only be judged to be atrocious, but who is talking about these things: the decrease in economic power; the sustained collapse in the euro’s value; the constant, continent-wide protests against the decisions of Brussels; the decrease in democratic credibility; the increase in militaristic domestic repression; the decrease in social economic protections for the average person; the rise of neo-fascist parties - what on earth does this reporter who has covered the EU since birth have to do get some real talk about United Europe anymore?
Ukraine will make or break the pan-European project
The European Union succeeds at nothing and nor do they stand for anything, so they’re desperate for any rallying cry for “Europe!”, and they’ve found one in Ukraine.
Of course, Europe has already failed Ukraine: their weaponry is being defeated, their production capabilities aren’t up to the job, everybody knows they’re just setting Ukraine up for the same debt traps they laid for a country like Greece, and they have failed (purposely) to find a diplomatic solution. Their only success is in their spectacularly prejudiced prioritising of Ukrainian refugees: this was, of course, to keep flooding the labor market with desperate, low-wage accepting workers amid record-high inflation - anything to keep wage demands down.
The reality is that Ukraine is going to either be the EU’s final undoing, or it will somehow lead to the “more Europe” that is the only way this misguided economic-but-not-political federalist project could ever possibly succeed.
Europe’s leaders know Ukraine is their best - given the far-right victories looming in European Parliament elections this spring - chances, which are diminishing, to rally Europe behind the pan-European project and away from Euroscepticism.
Remember that in two years Macron has gone from “we must not embarrass Russia” to calling other European countries “cowardly” for not buying Ukraine even more weapons, and even threatening to land NATO troops. Why the huge shift?
Of course war is good for business - France has soared to become the #2 arms merchant in the world. But in a bloc which has a pre-Covid history which no one in the 1% wants anyone to remember, it’s only via war with Russia that European public opinion could possibly be united in favor of “Europe!”.
European imperialists have run out of racism and now can only rely on nationalist prejudice - this is what the EU has revealed itself to be. Furthermore, during the 2010s we were constantly told in France that the pan-European project was the only reason war didn’t break out in Europe - recall how the EU won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2012, amid mass anti-austerity repression? This justification is now out the window.
No peace, no public opinion in public policy, no prosperity - no success for the EU, and when will success ever arrive?
Now isn’t the time, Europeans are being told, to argue about the lack of results in the pan-European project - Putin is at the doorstep. Marine Le Pen fairly accused Macron of creating a situation - surrounding this week’s French Parliamentary approval of a 10-year military pact with Ukraine - where, “You’re either with Macron or you’re with Putin”. That’s not just Russophobia or scapegoating - that is the summation of Macron’s whole political policy now.
Nobody - no popular democratic majority - has ever been or will ever be with Macron, but the fabrication of false unity is what Ukraine is being manipulated for here in Europe.
But it’s going to be even bigger than that in the coming months and maybe even years, namely: “Either you’re with the pan-European project or you’re with Putin”.
After all, how else can support for the pan-European project possibly be created in 2024? They cannot stand on their results, and they cannot stand on hopes that the project will suddenly become workable, profitable, democratic, morally responsible, inspire confidence, etc.
The failure of Europe - that’s the biggest story of the 21st century.
Neo-Nazi ideology has become one of the main protagonists of political and social life in Ukraine since the 2014 coup d'état. And that's a fact.
Print this article 
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
If you find the above COMPELLING, pass it on! Become an “influence multiplier”!
Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Indeed, Ukraine caused the failure of Europe while the US reduces European economies to ashes by blowing up the gas pipeline from Rusia to Germany. It is not just China that challenges US hegemony but so does ‘old’ Europe. The US itself is reorganizing its labor market by the willful immigration of people through its Southern border, thus in the near future cheapening the labor market. To become competitive in world trade US living standards must be lowered, i.e. the high inflation.