by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
The “non-racist” Republicans (as if such a thing exists) are threatening to bail out of the Party rather than share it with Donald Trump. Can Bernie Sanders’ Democratic followers share a Party with the corporate shill, Hillary Clinton? “Once the two-party arrangement has been fractured on the Right – as has already begun – it will likely splinter on the Left, as well.”
“If Clinton is perceived as insulting the Sandernistas or their leader, there could still be a revolt on the Democratic side of the duopoly.”
The U.S. duopoly electoral structure is in deep crisis, as Donald Trump consolidates his appeal to the unapologetic racist core of the Republican Party and Hillary Clinton rides the Black vote to inevitable victory in the Democratic camp. Both parties, as presently constituted, are inherently unstable, and the GOP is already imploding. If there are two “Republican” parties in orbit, then the “Democratic” half of the duopoly will also lose its moorings and equilibrium, even though triumphant in November. Thanks, Donald Trump.
Although the Democrats may avoid an open rupture with the Sandernistas in Philadelphia this summer, Hillary Clinton’s corporate machine will move quickly to reposition the party to the right in November so as to absorb the white “moderate” exiles from the Republican rubble – thus, further alienating Bernie’s insurgents. Black voters, who are fully aware that they saved Clinton from ignominious defeat in the early primaries, will in very short order be pushed back in their “place”: the captive constituency. But this, too, is unsustainable if even half of the duopoly comes undone, because the duopoly system is the cage that traps Blacks inside the Democratic Party.
“Hillary Clinton’s corporate machine will move quickly to reposition the party to the right in November so as to absorb the white ‘moderate’ exiles from the Republican rubble.”
As long as there is a monolithic GOP playing the role of the White Man’s Party – as has been the case since 1968 – Blacks will feel compelled to huddle within the Democratic half of the duopoly. The impending GOP split would not create a new Republican-type brand that would be attractive to Black Democrats: rather, it would be a haven for whites that cannot support Trump. The Democrats are hoping that the Trump phenomenon will give them the opportunity to create a kind of “super-party” that would corral almost everyone except the most racist elements of the white electorate. In practice, that means Clinton and her corporate crew are already gearing up to lure hordes of panicked white “conservatives” that cannot, for one reason or another, stomach Trump, into the Democratic “big tent.” That’s why, in the near term, the split in the GOP will result in a more pronounced attempt by the Democratic Party leadership to shift to the right, which is their intention in all seasons.
The Democrats don’t “drift” rightward; their modus operandi is to hug as closely as possible to the Republican troglodytes, keeping just enough to the “left” of the GOP to give the appearance of an ideological contest. Under a new electoral configuration – Trump Party vs Old GOP vs Democrats – the natural inclination of corporate Democrats would be to woo the more polite conservatives of the Old GOP to their tent.
“Democrats are hoping that the Trump phenomenon will give them the opportunity to create a kind of ‘super-party.’”
If recent history is any guide, Black Democrats will still be reveling in their status as saviors of Hillary’s career, President Obama’s “legacy,” and the whole world – from the demonic Trump. The Black Misleadership Class will take credit for the meltdown of the GOP-as-we-have-known-it, even as Clinton schemes to accommodate displaced and disoriented white Republicans in the Democratic fold.
The Dem-Rep duopoly might, however, soon start to collapse at both ends. Once the two-party arrangement has been fractured on the Right – as has already begun – it will likely splinter on the Left, as well. Bernie Sanders’ troops are keenly aware that the polls show he runs better against the Republicans than Clinton; that he is the most trusted of all the candidates, while Trump and Clinton are the least; and that majorities of Democrats favor Sanders for the nomination. The senator from Vermont may fully intend to endorse Clinton in Philadelphia, but his followers despise her. If Clinton is perceived as insulting the Sandernistas or their leader, there could still be a revolt on the Democratic side of the duopoly. Both conventions might resemble Chicago in 1968 – and it couldn’t happen to two nicer parties.
If the Republicans split in two, they won’t seem so formidable that Black folks will feel it necessary to cower under the Democratic umbrella, in search of protection from the White Man’s Party. The Black MIsleadership Class, whose allegiance and fortunes are tied to the Democrats, would begin to lose its leverage within the community, and the Black Radical Tradition could once again find its voice.
So please, white Sandernistas, strike a blow for Black liberation. Trash the Democratic Party! Down with the Duopoly!
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com
Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com
We apologize for this inconvenience.
=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
Nauseated by the
vile corporate media?
Had enough of their lies, escapism,
omissions and relentless manipulation?
Send a donation to
The Greanville Post–or
But be sure to support YOUR media.
If you don’t, who will?
7 Comments
The BAR team is always
Submitted by beverly on
The BAR team is always optimistic about the second coming of the “black radical tradition.” I wouldn’t wager too much on that happening on a mass scale. I see it as it is now – a few people/groups here and there but nothing on the scale of what was seen in the MLK heyday. Sanders and Killary debates blanketed the airwaves but the brokeass, housing insecure, jobless, underemployed, laden with student debt black sheeple tuned out Sanders and shuffled off to Miss Killary’s slaughterhouse. Droneman didn’t even endorse her and they still were too wimpy, clueless, or something to vote for someone whose agenda matched their interests more closely. Look for the bulk of black votes to remain with mainstream Dems as long as they continue to be brainwashed by presstitute media and black misleadership class – including the new generation misleadershippers who are already hitching their wagons to the fascist wing of the Demowit party.
Still confused
Submitted by High Arka on
This BAR hostility to Donald Trump is strange. Here is a candidate who wants to stop favoring Israeli apartheid, stop imperial warfare, and pull out of Africom and foreign “intervention” and let Somalia and Haiti and Cuba find their own destinies, thereby saving millions upon millions of Black lives.
And best of all, Trump is taking all those positions while not simultaneously whining about upper middle class White kids who have too much student debt because they spent seven years getting drunk while majoring in “Marketing Communication Studies” or some other bullshit.
This is a better policy platform than even Jill Stein is offering this year. No more war, no more African “nation building,” no more blowback, and no more communities being destroyed by MS13’s anti-Black assassination squads.
You’re
Submitted by jo6pac on
writing satire right?
Trump
Submitted by mulligas on
I haven’t heard of Trump opposing Africom but I have read that he said that Africa needs to be recolonized for another 100 years. Trump merely supports the changes made to the Cuban policy made by Obama. I haven’t heard of any positive proposals by Trump for Haiti or Somalia. Trump has also proposed the reintroduction of waterboarding and the murder of families of terrorists, a war crime.
Trump has also proposed heavy bombing of ISIS in Iraq.
“Sanders and Killary debates
Submitted by Bill Michtom on
“Sanders and Killary debates blanketed the airwaves”
If you had actually paid ANY attention, you would know this is not true. The DNC did everything it could to be sure the debates were poorly watched–putting them on at times that would draw few viewers and limiting the number of debates.
Kinda undermines everything else you say.
Which they couldn’t have done without
Submitted by High Arka on
support from the media corporations that are essentially identical to the DNC in viewpoint.