ABOVE IMAGE: Soros attending one of many global ruling class “economic forums.”
Stephen Karganovic
DC Leaks has made public this year about 2,500 Soros Foundation related confidential dispatches. Why have DC Leaks hackers specifically targeted Soros? Their unflattering reply to that question is that they regard Soros and his organization as “architects and sponsors of virtually every revolution and coup during the last 25 years, as vampires rather than beacons of freedom and democracy.” Because of Soros and the puppets he installs in targeted countries, they allege, the blood of millions has been shed in order to make a tiny few even wealthier.
The hacked documents present panoramic proof of Soros’ involvement in virtually every contemporary political imbroglio, from the migrant crisis to the Ukraine, and from being the largest single contributor to Hilary Clinton’s failed presidential campaign to influence buying in the American judicial system.
It is natural to ask what is this “billionaire philanthropist’s” (as the hackneyed phrase has it) ultimate goal? What complex game is this complex character actually playing?
The disclosed confidential documents make it clear that Soros’ Open Society Foundation (OSF) is aggressively determined to influence the political scene in the US and Europe. At the moment, a significant aspect of that effort is shaping a political and media milieu favorable to the reception of immense numbers of culturally incompatible migrants in the EU and the United States. The huge population shift, which many suspect is not entirely spontaneous and erratic, was decreed by Soros personally to be the “new normal”[2]. Seemingly contrary to hitherto standard precepts of business logic, Soros has announced his intention to invest the hefty sum of half a billion dollars into creating conditions for the permanent settlement of Middle Eastern migrants in Europe.[3] This initiative comes in the wake of Soros’ New York Times interview[4] where he matter of factly urged European governments to “develop an asylum policy with a generous target, up to a million refugees a year with the target open for several years.”[5]
The demographic engineering advocated by Soros, such as the world has not seen in a long time, raises the question of whether Soros is acting solely under his personal inspiration or is, in fact, the public face of an exceptionally influential group of people with an extensive geopolitical and cultural agenda, seeking the transformation not just of Europe but of the world in general.
The existence of a broader agenda, greatly transcending business in the purely traditional sense, was suggested by Soros’ active involvement in all the key segments leading up to the Ukrainian coup in 2014 and the introduction of militantly anti-Russian policies and rhetoric emanating from Kiev since then. Significantly, the operation of fabricating a new Ukrainian identity on anti-Russian foundations proceeded in parallel fashion, while at the same time spreading the attractive but in practical terms utterly misleading notion that the destiny of Ukraine was to become part of the “European family of nations,” with the unmistakable hint to the dazzled masses that they stand to profit greatly if they turn their backs to Russia. In broad terms that cultural re-engineering operation has been going on in the Ukraine for the last twenty years, with Soros’ fingerprints all over it, only to finally bear fruit in the Maidan takeover in 2014. A critical component in setting the stage for it was the “subversive archipelago” of interlocking Soros-financed organizations, a multi-headed Hydra composed of hundreds of outfits of various sizes and profiles acting on various fronts, but with a single overall objective.
What is important to bear in mind is that Soros is not a solitary and not even the somewhat eccentric but basically benign figure, which in media puff pieces he is made out to be, but is an actor playing a well-choreographed and synchronized role in furtherance of transnational political and economic interests. In the globalists’ game, Soros is not a peripheral player but one of their key exponents.
OSF’s real “under the radar” work is exemplified by their apparent determination to influence the US judicial system, as laid out by Politico magazine.[6] A similar “under the radar” pattern can be observed in OSF activities elsewhere also, focusing on the patient education of local cadres who – assisted by OSF and other like-minded mechanisms already in place – are to be quietly advanced in their Gramscian march through the institutions until they seize posts in government, society, and culture from where they will exert the influence and make policy decisions as they had been programmed to do.
[dropcap]A[/dropcap]n example of the way this works is the quiet and largely unnoticed takeover, under OSF’s tutelage, of no less than 226 European Parliament deputies, who were named in DC Leaks’ documents as being financially dependent on Soros’ financial largess in one form or another, the most important of them being EU Parliament president Martin Schulz. For a sense of scale in assessing the level of potential influence exerted by an external, non-parliamentary actor such as George Soros, it should be noted that the largest parliamentary group in Strasbourg, the moderate right caucus, has 215 members, i.e. fewer than George Soros’ own informal voting bloc in the EU parliament.
This is a fact that negates the very essence of democracy. These parliamentarians may be more beholden to George Soros (who, incidentally, has plans for Europe about which the European peoples are not being consulted and of which they do not necessarily approve) than they are to their voters. As in the example of Soros’ efforts to influence the judicial process in the US, this sort of private influence on public servants is not merely dangerous but absolutely fatal to democracy and the rule of law.
Which leads back to the fundamental question of what ultimate goal lies behind the seemingly variegated and sometimes confusingly contradictory activities of Soros’ organizations throughout the world? The Jerusalem Post, which is a very serious newspaper and chooses its words carefully, reflecting on the documents unearthed by DC Leaks, has denounced George Soros and his Open Society Foundation for conducting “a campaign of global chaos”[7] whose objectives are to undermine nation-states and traditional identities and values throughout the world.
A well-reasoned and alarming analysis, indeed. If even in Israel there is such apprehension that Soros’ activities might endanger that country’s internal security and identity that speaks volumes about George Soros’ destructive profile and the disturbing impact of his global crusade.
[2] “Wall Street Journal,” 20 September 2016
[3] For a detailed account of these bold ambitions, see Open Society Foundation’s official dissertation on the subject: http://soros.dcleaks.com/fview/President/2016/international-migration-initiative-governance-and-enforcement-may-12-2016/imi_governance-enforcement-prd-5.12.2016.pdf
[4] “New York Times,” 11 February 2016
[5] Ibid.
[6] “Politico”, 30 August 2016; http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/george-soros-criminal-justice-reform-227519
[7] “Jerusalem Post,” 23 August 2016
Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com
We apologize for this inconvenience.
What will it take to bring America to live according to its own propaganda?
=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
Please see our red registration box at the bottom of this page
Excellent piece. I’m so glad WaPo published that list of Fake News sites! He did us all a favor.
I too have found amazing articles on dozens of them.
Excellent piece. I’m so glad WaPo published that list of Fake News sites.
I’ve found amazing articles on dozens of them.
The only consistent themes seem to be criticism of American Empire, financial reform, intolerance of corruption and decentralization.