Parting shot—a word from the editors
The Best Definition of Donald Trump We Have Found
In his zeal to prove to his antagonists in the War Party that he is as bloodthirsty as their champion, Hillary Clinton, and more manly than Barack Obama, Trump seems to have gone “play-crazy” -- acting like an unpredictable maniac in order to terrorize the Russians into forcing some kind of dramatic concessions from their Syrian allies, or risk Armageddon.However, the “play-crazy” gambit can only work when the leader is, in real life, a disciplined and intelligent actor, who knows precisely what actual boundaries must not be crossed. That ain’t Donald Trump -- a pitifully shallow and ill-disciplined man, emotionally handicapped by obscene privilege and cognitively crippled by white American chauvinism. By pushing Trump into a corner and demanding that he display his most bellicose self, or be ceaselessly mocked as a “puppet” and minion of Russia, a lesser power, the War Party and its media and clandestine services have created a perfect storm of mayhem that may consume us all.— Glen Ford, Editor in Chief, Black Agenda Report
[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]
Karma is simply the spiritual law of cause and effect. Similar to Newton’s to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. So in its broad sense, karma is the accurate term. One could also say in the modern Western perverted way, ‘no good deed goes unpunished.’ Or ‘bad money drives out good money’. Look, the world in general and West in particular is run by gangsters. So it is to be expected that Assange, who essentially fights evil by exposing it, is singled out both for his daring to challenge Moloch, but also to discourage others from doing… Read more »
What more proof does one need to confirm the fact of the “two-party myth”,
The donkey wing of America’s Republicrat Party cheers when the elephant wing of the Republicrat Party persecutes a perceived political enemy (Assange) of the donkey wing.
America’s imperial duopoly drops its mask of democracy day by day.
I’m sure the party loyalists are outraged that Wikileaks shone a light on the corruption of the Clinton wing, but I don’t think this had much (if any) impact on voting choices. What percentage of voters actually read those documents? Of those, how many still voted for Hillary Clinton because they perceived her as being the “lesser evil?” In the end, and as years of research have confirmed, most voting choices come down to economic issues. The Dem voting base had long consisted of the poor to middle class, workers and those who are left jobless. Democrats split this base… Read more »