This essay is part of a series on cultural, scientific and esoteric matters.
THIS IS A REPOST • 2021-12-23 • FIRST PUBLISHED Jun 30, 2019
Answer • Cars and Automobiles
The Downfall of the American Car The situation was counterintuitive. Why would a nation at the top of its international game, in fact the world's uncontested superpower, financially able to command the highest levels of consumer technology and the best and most abundant natural inputs, not to mention probably one of the mos capable labor forces in history, suddenly begin to turn out inferior cars? After all, the consumer revolution in "durables" had been detonated by Henry Ford in the 1910's by the mass manufacturing of cars that were known for their dependability bordering on indestructibility. Obviously, the problem was not one of production, a lack of know-how, but what some business magazines and particularly astute sociologists were already alerting us about, a profound shift in business philosophy. The US was quickly spawning an increasingly deformed, indeed corrupt, "peculiar American executive culture", where bottom-line thinking, boardroom and Wall Street pressures, and frenzied career advancement where greed came first, second and last, was pushing consumer values to the bottom and total irrelevance. For all intents and purposes, the top American executive, by any standard already grotesquely overcompensated, accustomed to no real challenges from abroad, and enjoying in most cases monopolistic power at home, was swimming in hubris and self complacency, the road to competitive disaster. This fact was easily perceived in the then leading manufacturing industries, from steel to autos. The supremacy of "financiation of capital" had been long predicted by those who understand capitalism's inexorable laws, but the myopia exhibited by most of the manufacturing industries leaders accelerated their demise from the summit of the American economy. Subterfuge replaces honest design As is by now the rule in all areas of American ruling class practice, Detroit sought to hide its shabby self-seeking embodied in obsessive cost-cutting and built-in obsolescence at consumer expense by ever more lavish infusions of advertising and public relations, modern marketing being the truest and most organically natural and undeniable child of modern capitalism. Not surprising that this inherently unstable structure would eventually come tumbling down, with the first oil crises of the 1970s providing the decisive push to seal the fate of the once great American car brands as the indisputable world leaders in their field. In replicating or simply mirroring the fantasy of voter sovereignty that continues to sustain the myth of American democracy, in the industry's haughty disregard for the needs and desires of the car buyers, and in their uber reliance on public manipulation to stay afloat, the American car makers have proved they are and remain part and parcel of an utterly degenerate system, one which, judging by the competition's own products, cannot even be explained entirely by the dynamics of regular capitalism. Below, Robert Maybeth, Seth Flannigan, Chris Everett, all US residents and personal observers of this phenomenon, plus other commenters, share their honest impressions with fellow Quora readers. My sincere thanks to them all. — PGPREFATORY NOTE BY PATRICE GREANVILLE
As almost everyone awake knows by now, US auto brands have been on the skids for generations. After a long period of fame and admiration that started by the turn of the 20th century for making cars that were robust, well made, technologically efficient and above all affordable, the cheering began to dry up by the late 1950s, when Detroit was shown to be making dangerously shoddy, ecologically deaf and obsolescent cars on purpose. This turning point, epitomised by Ralph Nader's exposés, which also launched a new era of better-informed consumerism, coincided with the aggressive entry of European and soon after Asian imports, makes that gradually but inexorably demonstrated that many foreign cars were not just cheaper but far better designed, in fact, designed to last. This was sheer sacrilege to Detroit's Big Three philosophy of endless "junking of cars" every 3 years, a ritual that had become enshrined in most American families consciousness since the end of WW2, as the nation had embarked on its legendary, historically unprecedented, middle class expansion.
At the showroom level, the downfall was therefore largely self-inflicted, product of cynicism, typical capitalist short-term thinking, and out of control careerism exacerbated by the rise of finance as the dominant factor in all economic decisions. Greed is Good was the executive mantra, now openly and loudly proclaimed, and Detroit's Big Three showed their belief in this dogma by cranking out ecologically insane vehicles—gas guzzlers— that were more and more boats or living rooms on wheels, wrapped in flash and glitter, and even childish, non-functional touches like audacious fins suggestive of interplanetary voyage. (Ironically, the fin had been first implanted on cars in the 1920s by European designers like Paul Jaray, a onetime aircraft designer, who worked chiefly for German makes (Mercedes, Audi), with the object of giving the cars a more stable, streamlined profile.)
Why do people still think American cars are bad?
WHAT THE REIGN OF TAILFINS AND CHROME ACTUALLY HID
Styling could not negate engineering defects, many of them, intentional
Robert Maybeth, former Mechanic on Bicycles, Cars, Trucks, Small Engines (1987-2015)
I worked in a government fleet for 30 years. Mostly Ford and Chevy/GMC/Dodge trucks with a lot of Ford Taurus and thousands of Ford crown vics in the police fleet. There were also several dozen Toyota Camrys and a few hundred Honda Civics in this fleet. I saw it all, and when you work with so many vehicles day in day out there’s really no more secrets as to how they’re made.
As a rule, I have seen that American cars have many, many designed in defects. I always believed that Americans could design cars just as good as the Japanese; but for some reason, they have deliberately chosen not to. I’m not talking about bad model YEARS since every car maker has those, I’m talking about the corporate culture itself – they deliberately made/make bad cars (when they could make good ones if they chose).
By “designed-in defects” I mean, problems that could have been eliminated in the design & engineering process – but were either left in or even actually added on later. I’m talking about “check engine” lights that come on at 20,000 miles, flimsy plastic parts (including such critical engine parts as intake manifolds) where metal should be used, poorly designed parts that fail too soon and are very difficult (read: more labor time) to access, replace or fix. Every mechanic is aware of these engineering disasters since they are the ones busy fixing them, and it’s discouraging. American cars are second-best unless you are one of those people that drives a new car every two years (before the defects begin to show themselves).
By contrast, most Japanese cars are masterpieces of engineering. They combine all the good elements – durability, function, cost – in the best possible compromise and sell that to the customer. The end user is seen as the one to be pleased and impressed (as opposed to most Detroit iron, which when you go to maintain or fix it seems like it was designed by your worst enemy). Most tellingly, the Hondas and Toyotas were rarely in the shop for repairs – no matter how many miles they had on the clock. It wasn’t just because the Detroit iron was over-represented in the fleet, it was because the Japanese stuff was just MADE BETTER. It became obvious, after decades of seeing this, that Japanese engineering is superior. It lasts longer, works better, with fewer problems than American stuff and this was a long-term trend. The difference might be explained by design philosophies, or the corporate management at the top (I have never doubted Detroit iron could be as good as Japanese stuff if the engineers were told and encouraged to do it) or something else that the Japanese were doing that the Americans weren’t.
I no longer own detroit iron – I stick to Toyotas now, especially now that I’m too old and infirm to crawl around under a car fixing them anymore. Japanese stuff is just better. I don’t like that, as an American, I wish it weren’t true, but everything I’ve seen says it is. I’d prefer to buy detroit iron. But since my money doesn’t grow on a tree in my garden – I can’t, I buy the better made cars.
27.8k views · View Upvoters · View Sharers
Chris Everett, American.
Because for a long time, they were really terrible. From about the early 1970’s to the mid to late 1990’s, most American made cars were terribly unreliable in comparison to Japanese made vehicles, in particular. Nearly everyone has a story of themselves or an immediate relative that had a horrible lemon from the “Big three”, and they well remember the constant promises during this era that they were SO MUCH BETTER than they were five years ago.
They rarely were.
Further, while inexpensive Japanese vehicles still tend to be well made, inexpensive US vehicles tend to be poorly made. As many people's first cars are naturally inexpensive, this tends to leave a poor taste in your mouth for the entire brand.
While you can certainly get very good vehicles from US automakers today, it will be a long time before people forget the generation long period of utter crap that they produced.
Fri · 4 upvotes including Arthur Ort
I have a Lada 2101 (1981). I was a fan of american iron. In 1987 A friend of mine bought a New Ford Escort, nice exterior I loved it, but the terminations, fuel consumption and agility were terrible in comparison with the old soviet [car], other friend had a Corolla SW (1982), better in fuel consumption than Ford with same engine size ( 1600 cc) and it had a radio (Ecort too).
Now, 2019, the only surviving car is the Lada. ripped seats, holes all around the body but runs smoothly. 30 mpg in city and faster from zero than a Suzuki Dzire. No radio.
I live in America.
Because most American cars sucked until very recently.
They were bad on gas, had cheap, plasticky interiors, broke down often, and were prone to rust in the northern states.
My father still owns a 1995 Chevy C-1500 with 160,000 miles on it. It's 22 years old, sure, but even with relatively low miles for that age, nearly every single part on that truck outside of the engine block and chassis has been replaced at least once. Its frame is rusty even though it has been kept in a garage for its entire life. The A.C. never worked. It gets 13 miles to the gallon. Just a horribly unreliable, unpractical vehicle.
All other ‘90s American cars that my father owned have died horribly. Our ‘93 Dodge Minivan went through two transmissions in just seven years of life (among many other repairs) before being sent to car heaven. Our ’92 Chevy Cavalier had a cracked engine block after just six years!
On the other hand, our family never had any such problems with Japanese (excluding Nissan), Korean or German cars. My Mazda 3 ran for seven years on just oil changes before it was totaled in an accident. My father's 15 year old BMW 3 series has 240,000 miles on it and has had maybe $1000 worth of work over the years. My sister's Hyundai runs fine after 12 years. The Toyota runs fine after 10. Even my other sister's Mini Cooper (not a brand known for reliability) has had only a few issues over the years compared to American cars.
I know that American cars have gotten better. I seriously considered them when recently car shopping. But I can totally understand why some people won't give them the benefit of the doubt.
Nice information dear.Keep up the good work.