For Russia, recovering Kursk is no walk in the rose garden

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


GILBERT DOCTOROW
opinions


Resize text-+=

Apti Alaudinov Kursk


In my last appearance on Judging Freedom, Judge Napolitano asked me whether the Ukrainian invasion of the Kursk region would be ended by the time of our next chat, two days from today. The implicit assumption behind this question is that the Russians were doing so well destroying all the NATO-supplied tanks, personnel carriers and other advanced equipment, they were killing and maiming so many Ukrainian troops by their carpet bombing and heavy glide bombing of the region, that none but a rag tag collection of invaders would be left to liquidate or take prisoner in the several days ahead.

This assumption was founded in the confident declarations of my peers in the Opposition or, shall we say, ‘dissident’ movement in the United States. And their certainty, which was reflected in the over-hyped titles given to the recordings of their interviews on youtube came from back channels in Russia that my peers have been using for their public statements.

For example, the very widely watched Scott Ritter revealed in a recent interview that he has been in touch with the commander of the Chechen forces now engaged in Kursk, Alaudinov. Such contact is entirely credible given the fact that Ritter visited Grozny earlier this year, met with the republic’s leader Kadyrov, participated in a review of the Chechen troops and surely met with some of their military chiefs.

Indeed, in view of the seeming consensus that the Russian recovery of Kursk is proceeding apace, with 4,000 of the estimated 12,000 invaders having been killed up to last Thursday,  I also foresaw an early end to the conflict, though not necessarily measured in one week. As I explained, the Russian Ministry of Defense only claims territorial gains when it has thoroughly combed the territory and assured itself there are no enemy forces hiding out here or there. The 1,000 square kilometers initially occupied by the Ukrainians are a lot of ground to comb

However, I have had my reasonable doubts about the value of using such back channels as Alaudinov. Back in the days of the battle for Bakhmut, we saw a lot of Alaudinov on the Sixty Minutes news and talk show. Each day presenter Olga Skabeyeva warmly welcomed him on air and he handled himself very well, speaking optimistically of Russia’s progress but giving no specifics that could be of use to the enemy. In short, his lips were sealed.  I find it hard to believe that such a professional soldier and patriot would give anything of use to a foreigner, however friendly he or she might be to the Russian cause.

Last night’s edition of the talk show The Great Game gave a very different picture of the state of conflict in Kursk from what my peers are saying and of where this proxy war may be headed NOW, not in some distant future.

See https://rutube.ru/video/f8abcf8a37c43568ef44089025726934/

The key personality in this discussion was Frants Klintsevich, identified on the video as leader of the Russian Union of Veterans of Afghanistan. His Wikipedia entry further informs us that after serving as a Duma member for many years he is now a Senator, i.e., a member of the upper chamber of Russia’s bicameral legislature. He has represented the city administration of Smolensk in the western part of the Russian Federation, where he is no stranger, having been born just across the border in what is now the independent state of Belarus.

For 22 years ending in 1997, Klintsevich was an officer in Russia’s Armed Forces, serving primarily with the parachutists, meaning that he has guts and knows what it means to face battle. He retired with the rank of colonel, but continued his military education in the Military Academy of the General Staff, graduating in 2004. He also has a Ph.D. in psychology and is a gifted linguist, with command of German, Polish, and Belarussian. He is a member of the steering committee of the ruling United Russia party. I bring this out to make the point that Klintsevich is no garden variety ‘talking head’ but a very authoritative source.

And his testimony on The Great Game is the kind of Open Source on which I rely to say what I do about current Russian affairs.

Klintsevich’s commentary last night was intended to sober up the television audience and explain why the fight in Kursk is far more complicated and challenging than anyone is saying either on Russian or on Western news. It also lays the foundation for a dramatic Russian escalation of the proxy war into a hot war threatening to become WWIII. Why?  Because the so-called Zelensky gambit in Kursk is fully enabled by the United States and its NATO allies, using skills, satellite and airborne reconnaissance, command and control resources in real time that are superior to anything the Russians possess. It also has Western including U.S. boots on the ground. And in conditions like this, the disadvantaged side faces a strong temptation to go for the great equalizer, nuclear arms, to defend itself and to assure its victory.

Klintsevich also said what I have not seen elsewhere, given the ubiquitous belief in Opposition interviews that the Ukrainians in Kursk are cut off from sources of supply: that Kiev has now raised the number of its forces sent to Kursk from 12,000 to 20,000.

In short, the Zelensky gambit that is being enabled fully by the United States is not a PR stunt but a full-blown invasion intended to be the vanguard of what will be an air assault on Russia’s strategic assets far in the rear using JASSM, Storm Shadow and other long-range missiles launched from F16s.

Zelensky has further intimated that the two U.S. aircraft carriers and their escorts now in the Eastern Mediterranean may be there not to contain Iran but for an all-out attack on Russia using their jets to deliver nuclear strikes.  I add to his analysis that this may explain the knock-out of Russia’s early warning radar stations in the south of the country by Ukrainian drones acting on orders from Washington.

So far, the Russian response to these gathering storm clouds has been two days in succession of massive missile and drone attacks on critical infrastructure in Ukraine. But let us not have any illusions: if the Russians sense that the United States is about to pounce on them, to use the assets in Ukraine and beyond not just against Russian planes, which have been moved back beyond the 900 km range of the , JASSM and Storm Shadows, but on critical civilian infrastructure to disable the war effort, then a preventive Russian attack on NATO, on the continental United States. not to mince words, is entirely conceivable. 

All of this is sure to play out in the weeks before 4 November and the U.S. elections.  The Biden administration is evidently committed to a struggle to the death. Who will flinch? Who will “win” is an open question.  Washington, you have been forewarned by Mr. Klintsevich, who is surely speaking on behalf of the Kremlin.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2024


Armageddon Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


 


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




In his crushing electoral victory, Vladimir Putin has won grudging legitimacy in the West

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends, and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Gilbert Doctorow
Armageddon Newsletter

Resize text-+=

In his crushing electoral victory, Vladimir Putin has won grudging legitimacy in the West

One may say that Vladimir Putin made his point to the Collective West in the latest presidential elections: that he enjoys enormous support among Russians which translates into legitimacy as Russia’s leader.

What can you say when 87% of the votes cast were for Putin and when the turnout of eligible voters was a record 77%.  Even the 350,000 votes cast by Russians living outside the country showed a similar result.


The Economist Oct 26, 2017 cover Putin Tsar

The West's malicious propaganda machine has long represented Pres. Putin as an autocratic despot, a new kind of czar. But if Russia was ruled by a czar they would be ecstatic. Here's the pretentious Atlanticist Neocon publication The Economist with one of its many snarky contributions to the slander campaign against the Russian leader. (Oct 26, 2017)


In this regard it is entirely logical that in response to the election results we have not heard derogatory personal remarks coming from the occupant of the Oval Office in Washington, who in the not so distant past has called Putin a ‘crazy SOB,’ a ‘murderous dictator’ and a ‘pure thug.’  No, official Washington is speaking of Putin as the ‘leader of Russia,’ meaning that he is the ‘go to’ man if there are to be negotiations to end the Ukraine war, an idea that is very much on the minds of Washington elites now that their bet on Kiev has turned to dross, and calamity on the field of battle is not welcome for an incumbent when America enters the heat of its own electoral cycle.

Of course, Western leaders, and in particular European leaders, have been kicking the tires. The Opposition was silenced, we are told. German Chancellor Scholz said, “Russia is a dictatorship and is ruled in an authoritarian manner by Vladimir Putin,” per The Financial Times.  The FT also quotes British Foreign Minister David Cameron as saying, “Putin removes his political opponents, controls the media and then crowns himself the winner. This is not democracy.” That is a particularly fine observation from a cabinet member of a government that is likely to be dissolved following the abysmal electoral results it expects in May. Even the FT has been speculating these past few days that Rishi Sunak may be heaved out in the street soon.

But nowhere in all the grousing of Western leaders and of their subservient press do we hear the word “illegitimate” applied to Putin.  That word comes up only from a certain autocrat who has crowned himself in Kiev, namely Vladimir Zelensky.  We find the following quote attributed to him on his X account:

“The Russian dictator is simulating another election. Everone in the world understands that this figure has simply become addicted to power and is doing everything he can to rule forever…There is no legitimacy in this imitation of elections and there cannot be.”

However, contrary to its habitual coverage of only one side, what Kiev says, the FT today also gave coverage to Vladimir Putin’s public remarks celebrating his victory.  Per the FT,

“Putin also suggested he was more legitimate than Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has postponed elections originally scheduled for this year under martial law.”  

We all know why.  Zelensky would be lucky to get 5% of the votes in a free and fair election.

Possibly some FT readers will see which end is up in this exchange of compliments.

By the way, the viciously anti-Putin New York Times, also called a time out on vilifying the Russian leader. We find the following in the on-line Tuesday briefing this morning:

“The authorities said Putin had won more than 87 percent of the vote. For the most part, Russians do appear publicly supportive of Putin, though they have been given no real alternative.”

No real alternative?  Abstain!  They didn’t. No, the Russian public put paid to the cruel tyrant fantasies of our own clowns in high places. 

It should be mentioned as well that major broadcast media in the West gave air time to important segments of Putin’s victory speech yesterday. Their editorial boards must be eating their ties.

©Gilbert Doctorow, 2024

Armageddon Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Neo-Nazi ideology has become one of the main protagonists of political and social life in Ukraine since the 2014 coup d'état. And that's a fact. 

RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.

Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




“The Brits Did It,” said Gil Doctorow about Navalny’s demise, before the West shifted the narrative.

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Gil Doctorow
ANNOTATED BY PATRICE GREANVILLE

Resize text-+=

As expected, there's been almost obsessive speculation about the sudden demise of Alexei Navalny, proven fraudster and notorious regime-change tool of the Anglo-American intel establishment. The dominant explanation, immediately endorsed by the West's propaganda machine, and echoed by the entire political class, is that the imprudent Navalny succumbed to the sordid ministrations of some Putin assassin. What else? Putin is the Anglos' default villain in today's world.  As usual, this finding of guilty required no proof of any kind, no impartial medical examination, nor the opinion of any other type of genuinely authoritative independent source. Reminds us of the kangaroo court that followed the downing of MH 17, a heinous crime that, if we are to trust the available evidence, clearly pointed to the West and the Kiev regime, rather than Moscow or the Donbas republics. So yea, the Navalny case has precedents. 
Now, however, for reasons still to be determined, the West is suddenly changing its tune. You can bet, though, that this is not an attack of sudden decency. 

Below, the first leg of this trip.

—The Editor

 

Follow-up to 'Redacted' interview on the death of Navalny

 

I am pleased to share the link which I have just received from the hosts of the ‘Redacted’ news and analysis platform.  This is a follow-up to my interview on the same subject which was put on line over this past weekend and has now been seen by over 320,000 visitors to the Redacted account on youtube.

What is new and led Natali Morris to reopen the issue was the announcement a day ago by the head of Ukrainian intelligence, Kyrylo Budanov, that Navalny died of natural causes, namely from a blood clot. She remarks that the Ukrainians are thus agreeing with what the Russian government said following their autopsy of Navalny.

The reason for Budanov’s remark to a journalist was to counter accusations that some, myself included, have made about Ukrainian involvement in the foul deed acting on orders from their British curators.  Of course, the Russians also push the story of an embolism to account for Navalny’s death, to exculpate themselves.  But two white lies are no substitute for the truth.

What is noteworthy in all this, per Natali Morris, is that this new story of natural causes works directly against the narrative put out by all Western leaders and journalists immediately following news of Navalny’s death, that Putin ordered the murder. She suggests that the CIA changed their narrative when it did not gain traction and they decided to move on to the next task of installing Navalny’s successor, whoever that might be, so as to proceed at once to disrupting the Russian presidential elections in March.  

Basing myself on what last night’s Solovyov talk show had to say about Budanov and his meeting with journalists, there are many open questions that will keep analysts busy for weeks to come.

I think it fair to identify Budanov as a CIA asset, so that his identification of ‘natural causes’ has the blessing of Washington now. Meanwhile, at the same chat with journalists Budanov also explicitly contradicted President Zelensky’s announcement earlier in the day that total Ukrainian deaths so far in the war are 31,000.  Per Budanov, there have been 500,000 deaths and that can be easily verified from space by watching the filling of cemeteries with new graves across all of Ukraine.

Let us remember that when the senior general of the Ukrainian army Zaluzhny was about to be fired there was widespread speculation that his replacement would be Budanov. The reason was that Budanov has been far more successful in arranging sabotage and political assassinations behind Russian lines than Zaluzhny had been in directing the summer’s counter-offensive.  For Budanov to directly discredit his President’s remarks on the all-important issue of war deaths suggests to me that there is a fierce power struggle now going on in Kiev, in which CIA bets are on Budanov and against Zelensky.

See  


Armageddon Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.

Since the overpaid media shills will never risk their careers to report the truth, the world must rely on citizen journalists to provide the facts that explain reality.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS