Godfree Roberts: Election Eve Reflections

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Godfree Roberts


Resize text-+=


The world doesn’t work as we pretend or imagine it does. Too often, we are led to believe it is a structured, ordered system defined by clear rules and patterns. This is the meme at the crux of the Rules Order narrative. The economy, apparently, runs on supply-and-demand curves. Politics is a science. Human beliefs can be charted, plotted, graphed – and by using the right regression and enough data, understand even the most baffling elements of the human condition. This is a stripped-down, storybook version of reality.
Brian Klaas. 3


Even in its death throes, Western mass media uphold the Official Narrative, while a new world is struggling to be born.

America is leading the West in a death spiral. Its greatest entrepreneur, Elon Musk, is a Western media punching bag1, once-mighty Boeing and Intel are bankrupt, its economies are in recession2 and its foreign policy is decided by Israel. 4 No Western leader, and neither American Presidential candidate is fit to run a business, let alone a country whose economy is collapsing as its debt reaches Weimar Republic levels.

Marginal returns are declining across many spheres of Western society. America can no longer build roads, subways or ships, nor manufacture anything competitively. Food, shelter, cars, trains, education, cinema and politicians all cost more and yield less. Though the Pentagon’s budget is 60% higher today than in 1975, the Air Force has 5,000 fewer aircraft and the Navy, which had 559 active ships then, has 296 today–fewer than 55 of which are combat-capable. (200 of China’s 362 newer ships are combat capable and Russia’s fleet is much more powerfully armed).

After a string of losses dating from their 1951 loss to China in Korea, the West is losing two more wars simultaneously. Ukraine destroyed the credibility of Western armaments and embargoes.

done, the US will know what to expect for its military bases throughout the Middle East. The American public will also, potentially, start to ponder the implications of taking on Iran militarily”. Like Ukraine’s Jewish led Nazis, Israel’s Jews have lost on all fronts and lied to their own people and the world about their losing.

China and Russia have never been so powerful, prosperous, united, or well led. Despite sanctions and embargoes, China’s economy will grow more this year, by $1.6 Tn., than in all but three years in its history. Russia’s economy moved up from sixth to fourth in the world while it was humiliating its enemies. Their joint founding of the SCO defense alliance and the BRICS cooperation platform–much more extensive than our media let on, and the subject of tomorrow’s post–have changed the world’s trajectory.

Let the wild rumpus begin...


 
1 Media attack Musk’s political views and advocacy for free speech, business practices and labor issues, public statements and social media presence, cultural and ideological differences, regulatory and legal battles and frequent criticism of media bias which exemplify tensions between traditional media and direct communication via social media.
2 Interstate freight is down 20% YoY, adjusted job growth is near zero and tech sector layoffs will hit 250,000 this year.
 
3. Editor's Note: Klaas is basically an Atlanticist/Libertarian and pro-Imperialist bourgeois social scientist, and a proponent of chaos theory which we only marginally buy, as it seeks to displace a Marxian understanding of human affairs. 
 
4. We disagree with this proposition. In our view, the US overwhelmingly controls the course of history in the Middle East, and the image of Israel leading the dog by the tail is merely a convenient fiction to hide the degree of American criminality in the region's affairs 

Subscribe to Here Comes China



Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Tibet’s Forgotten History

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


GODFREE ROBERTS
Here Comes China


Resize text-+=

All the serfs and slaves take with them is their shadow. Their only legacy is their footprints. —Tibetan saying.

Chou en Lai, the Panchen Lama, Mao and the Dalai Lama. Beijing, 1952


When the Mongols arrived in Tibet in 1271 AD, Buddhism had split into warring sects that united only to massacre members of the native Bon religion. In 1672, when the fifth Dalai Lama faced a rebellion from the Tsang province, he ordered a Mongolian army under his control to exact retribution:

[su_note note_color="#f7f4cb" radius="13"]For the band of enemies who have despoiled the duties entrusted to them: Make the male lines like trees that have had their roots cut; Make the female lines like brooks that have dried in up winter; make the children and grandchildren like eggs smashed against rocks, make the servants and followers like heaps of grass consumed by fire, make their dominion like a lamp whose oil has been exhausted. In short, annihilate any traces of them, even their names.[/su_note]

A journalist on the expedition, Perceval Landon1, described the Thirteenth Dalai Lama’s rule as ‘an engine of oppression’ and Captain W.F.T. O’Connor concurred, “The great landowners and the priests … exercise each in their own dominion a despotic power from which there is no appeal, while the people are oppressed by the most monstrous growth of monasticism and priest-craft”. Wrote Spencer Chapman2, “Tibet’s rulers invented degrading legends and stimulated a spirit of superstition among the common people. The Lamaist monk does not spend his time ministering to the people or educating them. The beggar beside the road is nothing to the monk. Knowledge is the jealously guarded prerogative of the monasteries and is used to increase their influence and wealth”.

After acknowledging China’s suzerainty, the British departed in 1904 and the Buddhists resumed their wars until 1950, when the PRC returned and ejected the warlords, Nazis, and spies who had fled there during the war, and negotiated the Agreement for the Peaceful Liberation of Tibet:

The local government of Tibet will drive imperialist forces out of Tibet; China will not alter the existing political system, all government officials will maintain their positions, and the status, functions, and powers of the Dalai Lama will remain unchanged. Tibet will carry out reforms following the wishes of its people, through consultation with its leaders rather than by compulsion; the Tibetan people will exercise autonomy under their government, and Tibetan religious beliefs, customs and habits, monasteries, and their incomes will be respected; Tibet will remain a theocracy and retain its autonomy in most military and diplomatic matters; Tibetan troops will be trained and integrated into the PLA and Beijing will guarantee peace with bordering countries.

American diplomat Robert Ford3 wrote, “There was no sacking of monasteries. On the contrary, the Chinese took great care not to cause offense through ignorance. They soon had the monks thanking the gods for their deliverance. The Chinese had made it clear they had no quarrel with the Tibetan religion”. The government allocated $500,000 to renovate the Buddhist temple in Beijing and granted additional funds to Tibetan Muslims for a pilgrimage to Mecca in 1957.

But China’s intervention triggered a violent reaction amongst Tibet’s elite, many of whom terrorized peasants who ‘collaborated’ with the PLA, but Mao4 urged patience, “Although the establishment of the military and administrative committee and the reorganization of the Tibetan troops were stipulated in the Agreement you had fears, and so I instructed the comrades working in Tibet to slow their implementation. The Agreement must be carried out but, because of your fears, it has to be postponed. If you are scared this year, it can wait until next year. If you still have fears next year, it can wait until the year after that”. Then, with Mao’s approval5, a fifteen-year-old Chinese-born boy was installed as the fourteenth Dalai Lama6.

Four years later, The Dalai and Panchen Lamas traveled to Beijing where they were greeted as Heads of State by Premier Zhou Enlai and Chief of General Staff Zhu De. Mao hosted dinners in their honor and the National People’s Congress elected the Dalai Lama Vice-Chairman of the Standing Committee7. In a speech to Congress, the Dalai Lama championed regional autonomy for all minorities, “Tibet’s Agreement has enabled the Tibetan people to fully enjoy all rights of ethnic equality and embark on a bright road of freedom and happiness”. He was frank about conditions in his country8 and enthusiastic about China,


Outside the monasteries, our system was feudal… The more I looked at Marxism, the more I liked it. Here was a system based on equality and justice for everyone which claimed to be a panacea for all the world’s ills. From a theoretical standpoint, its only drawback was its insistence on a purely materialist view of human existence. This I could not agree with. I was also concerned at the methods used by the Chinese in pursuit of their ideals. I received a strong impression of rigidity. But I expressed a wish to become a Party member all the same. I felt sure, as I still do, that it would be possible to work out a synthesis of Buddhist and pure Marxist doctrines that really would be an effective way of conducting politics”.

In 1998, Professor Dongping Han9 met the Dalai Lama when he visited Brandeis University:

He agreed to meet Chinese scholars and China scholars in the Boston area behind closed doors. He said that in 1950, on his way to Beijing for talks with the Chinese central government, he was filled with doubt about Tibet’s future. But on his way back, he was filled with hope for Tibet and China’s future because he saw with his own eyes how Chairman Mao and other Chinese leaders were working hard for the Chinese people. He also said that Chairman Mao treated him like a younger brother, and he was able to talk with Chairman Mao freely and candidly for three days with the help of an interpreter. No Chinese leader, he said, ever treated him like Chairman Mao did. It seemed that behind closed doors and in the absence of reporters, the Dalai Lama could be disarmingly candid and persuasive.


During his years in Beijing the young man had forgotten Tibet’s political realities, where the nobles and abbots had murdered the ninth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth Dalai Lamas for reformist tendencies. Drepung Monastery, the seat of fierce resistance to the Chinese, owned one-hundred-eighty-five manors and twenty-five-thousand serfs, and employed sixteen-thousand herdsmen. Its lamas forced boys into monastic slavery, pilfered the country’s wealth, and sold serfs along with the land. American journalist Anna Louise Strong10 found handcuffs of all sizes at Drepung, including small ones for children, and instruments for cutting off noses and ears, gouging out eyes, breaking off hands, and hamstringing legs, hot brands, whips, and disembowelling implements.


Resentment

By the time the Dalai Lama reached Lhasa from his Beijing sojourn, PRC reforms had stirred deep resentment among the elite. Public schools threatened their monopoly of education, training serfs as technicians upset the social hierarchy, and paying wages for road construction challenged the ulag tradition: in 1957 a lord beat his serf almost to death in Shann’an for failing to perform his unpaid ulag. Like Virginian plantation owners a century earlier, the nobles saw emancipation as a threat and turned for help to Washington. Says US Ambassador Chas W. Freeman11

I don’t see why Tibet being part of China should be any more controversial than Wales being part of the United Kingdom. The periods when they were put into that position were about the same … but the Central Intelligence Agency, with assistance from some of China’s neighbors, put $30 million into the destabilization of Tibet and financed and trained the participants in the Khampa rebellion and ultimately sought to remove the Dalai Lama from Tibet–which they did. They escorted him out of Tibet to Dharamsala. The CIA programs were very effective in destabilizing Tibet, but did not succeed in Xinjiang”.


The CIA persuaded Kashag12 officials and Khampa13 tribesmen to rebel, and the ensuing riot killed eighty-thousand people. It took the PLA twenty hours to hoist the Red Flag over the Potala Palace, and, when the smoke cleared the nobles, along with the Dalai Lama and the country’s gold reserves were in India, though Mao14 had told the local PLA commander, “If the Dalai Lama and his entourage flee Lhasa, our troops should not try to stop them. Whether they are heading to southern Tibet or India, just let them go.”


SIDEBAR
Western propaganda, always smugly cackling about "freedom", never misses an opportunity to use the Dalai Lama for anti-Communist / anti-Chinese propaganda—particularly through historically decontextualised items like this. So here's Ann Curry, a prominent TV (NBC) disinformer, crying mawkish tears over Tibet's "suffering", although the problems of Tibet —largely self-inflicted via the CIA, and counter-revolutionary action, etc.—cannot even begin to compare with the horrific victimisation of Palestinians, about which the US government and media are largely silent if not actively supporting. For his part, the Dalai Lama, profusely praising "American democracy and freedom", sounds like a late incarnation of Braveheart.
!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/uukz21"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");
 
Rumble("play", {"video":"v5e2zhl","div":"rumble_v5e2zhl"});

Oct 21, 2012
His Holiness the Dalai Lama is interviewed by NBC's Ann Curry during his October 2012 Visit to Syracuse, New York, USA. The interview was originally broadcast on October 11, 2012.


Later, Mao said, “If the Dalai Lama is willing to return home and is able to get rid of the reactionaries, then we hope he will. But is it possible for him to change his own world outlook? If he wants to return, he can do so tomorrow… Indian newspaper stories say he plans to return but the two statements he made thoroughly oppose the Central Government and the big family of the motherland and advocate Tibetan independence. As a result, he has blocked his own way back. Even so, we must leave leeway for him by electing him Vice-Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress and Chairman of the Preparatory Committee of the Founding of the Tibet Autonomous Region”.

When the Dalai Lama declined to return, Beijing terminated the Tibetan government, separated Church and State, abolished slavery, serfdom, ulag labor and debt peonage, concluding, “The fundamental improvement of national relations, in the final analysis, depends on the complete emancipation of the working classes within each nationality: class struggle, aimed directly at the overthrow of the local elite”.


Notes
1 The opening of Tibetan account of Lhasa and the country and people of central Tibet, and the progress of the mission sent there by the English government in the year 1903-4. (1905). Landon was one of the first Europeans to describe the holy city of Lhasa in detail.
2 The Timely Rain, Gelder and Gelder,123-125.
3 The Making of Modern Tibet By A. Tom Grunfeld
4 Xinhua Monthly, February 1952, p. 11.
5 All Dalai Lamas have required Chinese Government approval before they are installed.
6 Freedom in Exile: Autobiography of His Holiness the Dalai Lama of Tibet by Dalai Lama XIV Bstan-‘Dzin-Rgya-Mtsho. Harpercollins 1990. (The title ‘Dalai’ means ‘ocean’ in Mongolian, and ‘Lama’ means ‘Living Buddha’ in Tibetan. In the 1950s, the US State Department titled him ‘God-King of Tibet’.
7 My Land and My People. The Fourteenth Dalai Lama.
8 The Socialist Legacy Underlies the Rise of Today’s China in the World–by Dongping Han. Aspects of India’s Economy Nos. 59-60 (Oct 2014)
9 The Socialist Legacy Underlies the Rise of Today’s China in the World–by Dongping Han. Aspects of India’s Economy Nos. 59-60 (Oct 2014)
10 Tibetan Interviews, A.L. Strong (1885-1970), pp 91-96
11 US Ambassador Chas. H. Freeman, Director for Chinese Affairs at the US Department of State from 1979-1981.
12 The CIA persuaded Kashag the governing council of Tibet during the rule of the Qing dynasty and post-Qing period until the 1959 rebellion.
13 The Khampa of Kham Province are the most hostile and violent of Tibetans, “Tall and well-built men, fearless and open of countenance, they resemble Apache Indians, with plaited hair hanging from each side of well modeled heads.” In 1950, the Chinese captured the town of Chamdo without firing a shot when they set off a huge fireworks display on the outskirts of the town, and the Khampa fled.
14 Beijing’s Power and China’s Borders: Twenty Neighbors in Asia. By Bruce Elleman, Stephen Kotkin, Clive Schofield.


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Chinese Energy Hegemony

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


by Godfree Roberts
WITH OUR SPECIAL THANKS TO THE AUTHOR


Resize text-+=

Humane authority and energy IP


 

When the Bretton Woods accords were signed, Jamaica as well as practically all the newly independent countries were part of either the sterling or franc system. They had no national currencies. Needless to say they were not represented in the negotiations. Until 1973 they imported or exported based on fixed exchange rates for their own currencies. With the Oil Crisis (coup) all these countries had to buy US dollars at exchange rates that could only drive their economies into debt spirals. Meanwhile the US Treasury could issue as many dollars as it needed to buy whatever it desired. Its banks, as owners of the World Bank and IMF, could dictate terms to any country without its own oil reserves and refining capacity. As Cuba learned, US refiners would not process alternative oil supplies from the Soviet Union, forcing it to nationalize plants built and operated by US multinationals. The capacity to manipulate both energy markets and currency markets was lodged in the two biggest banking and oil cartels, those of the Rockefeller and Rothschild families. The story of the international debt crisis is to extensive and complex to elaborate here. Yet it is crucial to recognize that energy and finance are two sides of the same institutional power. There is no financial power without control over energy and no energy policy without brute financial power.T.P. Wilkinson.



Energy wars

The West is currently waging three energy wars:

  1. Ukraine. EU industries have grown uncompetitive and millions of lives have grown nastier, shorter and crueler since they urged Ukraine to attack the owner of the largest energy reserves on earth, Russia. The disastrous results speak for themselves.

  2. Venezuela, with the world’s largest oil reserves, has been under relentless attack since its government renationalized its oilfields in accordance with the constitution. Sabotage, invasion, terrorism, theft of foreign assets and gold reserves, lawfare, false ‘presidents’ – all been mobilized to cripple the economy.

  3. Israel, Anglo-America’s dagger at the throat of MENA energy providers, regularly bombs and terrorizes them. If those oilfields were lavender fields, Israel would not exist.

The Dream

It's amazing when you think of it," said Adell, watching the cubes of ice slur clumsily about. All the energy we can possibly ever use for free. Enough energy, if we wanted to draw on it, to melt all Earth into a big drop of impure liquid iron, and still never miss the energy so used. All the energy we could ever use, forever and forever and forever. The Last Question. Isaac Asimov.

Science fiction writers fantasize about how much nicer, longer and more civilized human life would be if every country had an inexhaustible supply of energy and everyone could afford as much of it as they needed. In this post we’ll look at post-2030 implications of China’s recent energy breakthroughs, given that it dominates all forms of modern energy generation, from efficient coal plants to wind generators to PV to pebble bed reactors and, now, fusion. 

‘Free energy’ enthusiasts, perpetual motion inventors and science fiction writers all extol the wonders of a world where electricity is as clean, abundant and affordable as town water. For them, it’s the equivalent of humanoids figuring out how to make fires in their caves. In 2012 a global consortium spent $20 billion building the ITER tokamak, hoping to generate first plasma by 2027, thus proving the concept of fusion power – even if it's not yet at the level needed for net energy production.

First Plasma

As we saw in the last post, Chinese engineers started in 2021 and spent $1 billion to achieve first plasma with their HH70 tokamak earlier this year. Like a slim laptop and a power-hungry mainframe, HH70 is 90% smaller, 95% cheaper, and 10x more energy-efficient than ITER, thanks to its use of high-temperature superconductors. More important, it turned a scientific curiosity into an engineering challenge. 

China fusion

Covering its bets

China now leads in fusion research, fusion technological prowess and fusion IP and has paved the way for commercially viable fusion reactors, control of which would give it economic dominance and huge geopolitical leverage while opening a new chapter in human development. 

But Beijing has placed more energy bets than HH70. 

Decades of persistent policy support, generous funding, domestic supply chains, large-scale manufacturing experience and highly educated workforce have given China dominance of all 21st century energy technologies. Says MIT Prof. Jacopo Buongiorno, “China is the de facto world leader in nuclear technology.” Indeed, not only is China 10-15 years ahead of the US in fourth-generation nuclear reactors, it also leads in fusion power and has first-mover advantage in pebble bed reactors and thorium power.

China’s 30% cheaper power obviously gives its businesses a huge advantage, but what would universal, $0.01 electricity do? Free, clean energy gives humanity a cosmic cheat code, solves many problems, introduces new challenges and reshapes civilization in ways we can barely imagine.

pebble bed reactor (PBR), is now delivering 200 MW to the grid, with a second unit under construction. Its core is baseball-sized graphite ‘pebbles’ containing uranium fuel. PBR reactors are modular, for shipment on railcars. The PBR supply chain is 93.4% domestic.

Using abundant, cheap thorium as its primary fuel, the firstthorium molten salt nuclear power station will start generating 60 MW by 2029. Because it requires an external neutron source to sustain it, the thorium reaction simply stops if something goes wrong. Expect a complete thorium Chinese supply chain and orders from countries distrustful of uranium technologies.

A (Chinese) Age of Sanity and Joy?

America’s 1938 choice of uranium over thorium because it could not be weaponized was fateful. It forever associated nuclear power with Hiroshima and, since then, rare accidents and spiralling construction costs have sidelined the technology. But because China’s nuclear plants cost 60% less than ours, 1 KWh of nuclear power there costs $0.07, compared to $0.08 for coal power and $0.12 in the USA and Germany. 

China’s 30% cheaper power obviously gives its businesses a huge advantage, but what would universal, $0.01 electricity do? Free, clean energy gives humanity a cosmic cheat code, solves many problems, introduces new challenges and reshapes civilization in ways we can barely imagine. It's like upgrading from a motorcycle to a spaceship, with all the misadventures that inevitably come with it:


  1. Economic Transformation:

    • Cost of living: With energy essentially free, the cost of living could decrease dramatically and electricity bills become as obsolete as dial-up internet.

    • Industry: Manufacturing, transportation, and agriculture see massive cost reductions, leading to an economic boom. Factories running 24/7 without concern for energy costs, electric vehicles going 1000 miles on a $0.50¢ charge.

  2. Environmental Impact:

    • Climate Change: The shift to fusion halts or even reverses some effects of climate change. It's like giving Earth a giant, cosmic air purifier.

    • Pollution: Air and water pollution from energy production would plummet. Cities look like they've been photoshopped for cleanliness.

  3. Technological Advancements:

    • Space Exploration: With abundant energy, space travel could become routine. Mars colonies, asteroid mining, or even interstellar travel as common as a trip to the mall.

    • Innovation: Free energy would fuel (pun intended) new technologies from advanced robotics to practical teleportation(?). If you thought smartphones were cool, wait until you can beam yourself to work.

  4. Social and Political Changes:

    • Energy Independence: Countries would no longer be at the mercy of oil or gas suppliers, greatly reducing geopolitical tensions. Every nation suddenly has its own energy magic wand.

    • Inequality: While free energy will reduce energy poverty, and energy drives development.

  5. Lifestyle Changes:

    • Sustainable Living: With energy no longer a concern, sustainable practices could become the norm, not the exception. Imagine cities where buildings are covered in solar panels, not for energy but for aesthetics.

    • Work and Leisure: With energy costs out of the equation, work hours decrease, and leisure time increases, societies focus on creativity, education, and personal growth.

  6. Global Development:

    • Developing Countries: Nations currently struggling with energy access could leapfrog traditional energy infrastructure, directly adopting fusion. This would lead to rapid development, reducing global disparities.

    • Desalination: With unlimited energy, desalination becomes cost-effective, resolving water scarcity in much of the world.

  7. Challenges and Considerations:

    • Resource Scarcity: While energy might be free, other resources like water, metals, or rare earth elements for fusion reactors might become bottlenecks.

    • Security: The technology might necessitate new forms of security measures.

  8. Cultural Shifts:

    • Energy as a Right: Energy might be seen as a basic human right, like food and shelter, fundamentally changing our societal structures and values.

    • Philosophical Questions: With energy no longer a limitation, humanity might start pondering bigger questions about existence, purpose, and the universe.

China's 21st century energy hegemony, if we can call it that, will be Confucian: foreign states may admire and praise it and send embassies to the Forbidden City bearing paltry gifts. They will be sent home laden with valuable trade privileges and IP licenses, a 2,000-year-old pattern that is unlikely to change.

By using force and pretending to benevolence the hegemon will certainly have a large state. By using virtue and practicing benevolence the wise ruler will achieve humane authority, for the humane man has no enemies. Mencius.


Appendix


Asian Fusion Breakthrough

It's the supply chain, stupid

 

The first electricity generated by controlled nuclear fusion must come from our country, and we are working towards this goal. Lu Tiezhong, Chairman, China National Nuclear Power, September, 2023.


Energy Singularity Installation. Surely an American wet dream to bomb this place to smithereens.


Amid growing concerns over a world energy crisis, controlled nuclear fusion1 is viewed by experts and industry as the ultimate solution to humanity’s need for infinite, clean, cheap energy. Once science fiction, it’s now a ferociously competitive field, as teams worldwide compete to make it a reality. Yet our media are ignoring the most exciting scientific news of this century

The Technology


The most popular approach to fusion energy uses tokamaks, whose superconducting magnets generate powerful fields that confine hydrogen atoms so that they fuse into heavier atoms and give off excess energy in the process.

In 2007 a multinational consortium raised $20 billion to build ITER, a tokamak2 fusion-containment reactor to demonstrate fusion plasma in 2026. ITER chose exotic, low-temperature superconductors to cool its magnets, their astronomical cost, complexity, bulk, and massive amounts of energy for cooling discouraged Chinese scientists at ITER, but their experience created a large talent pool of outstanding fusion engineers.

In 2001, Energy Singularity Corp3, a private Shanghai company, raised $1 billion to build HH7, a tokamak fusion-containment reactor. Energy Singularity chose cheap, high-temperature superconductors, HTS, to generate stronger magnetic fields in smaller, cheaper, faster machines than ITER’s and its first tokamak, HH7 achieved a plasma density4 high enough for commercial goals last month. Yasmin Andrew, a nuclear scientist at Imperial College London, said several private companies (Bill Gates funds one) are working on fusion, but HH70 is the first tokamak to achieve a plasma.


MIT’s Dennis Whyte says the domestic supply chain and technology development are critical as fusion technology advances, “It is no longer just studied for science’s sake but is pivoting towards implementation as a new energy source”.

The exotic HTS tapes in the HH70, for example, come from Shanghai Superconductor, a global supplier since 2011 and one of six that mass-produces HTS tapes. This year, Energy Point Corp, another member of the fusion supply chain, will deliver 25 Tesla, D-shaped high-temperature magnets – ten times stronger than HH70’s 2.5 Tesla magnetic field, and construction of HH170 will begin next year. Work on a tokamak fusion power plant, HH380, will begin around 2030.


New energy, new industry


Significantly, 93% of the high-temperature superconducting tokamak was sourced from China’s domestic fusion industrial chain and 100% of its IP is entirely indigenous.

China’s Secret Sauces


Andrew Holland, CEO of the Fusion Industry Association, fears that the fusion industry will follow the pattern of the solar industry, where manufacturing came to be dominated by China. “It’s very clear that China has ambitions to do the same thing, both in the supply chain and in the developers,” he said. “It’s time for the US to respond to this challenge”.

But China’s consistent policy support, generous funding, domestic supply chain, large-scale manufacturing experience and vast, highly educated workforce give the country an immense, first-mover advantage in the engineering implementation of nuclear fusion technology and, potentially, creating a new era of sanity and joy.

Hydrogen Bombs are unconfined nuclear fusion events.

Russia created T-1, the first tokamak, in 1958.

Energy Singularity was established in Shanghai in 2021, focusing on commercially viable high-temperature superconducting tokamak devices and their operational control software systems. The company's shareholders include miHoYo, developer of Genshin Impact, and EV maker, NIO.

The higher the density the more nuclei packed together, increases the chances of a fusion event. “Plasma density is the Goldilocks factor in nuclear fusion: too low, and the fusion reactions won't happen, too high, and the plasma becomes unstable. Finding and staying in the sweet spot is essential for achieving the high-energy-density plasmas needed for sustainable fusion power”.


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




How America Impoverished the 90%

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. BREAKING THE EMPIRE'S DISINFORMATION MACHINE IS UP TO YOU.



Godfree Roberts
REPOSTED
Eds



Resize text-+=

How America Impoverished the 90%

Their poverty is a feature, not a bug

 
 
 
 

The doctrine of developmentalism – that countries develop best by educating their people, fostering strong domestic markets and imposing high tariffs on imports – enjoyed a golden age postwar. By 1969, says Naomi Klein, the Southern Cone looked more European than Third World. Workers in new factories formed strong unions that negotiated middle-class salaries and their children went off to study at new public universities. By the Fifties, Argentina had the largest middle class in South America, while Uruguay provided free health care to its 95% literate people.

Ike’s War On Development

Since developmentalism is rooted in equality, justice and independence, the US painted it as the first step towards godless communism, forever tarnishing it in Americans minds. Then, in 1953, President Eisenhower launched the war on development by appointing the Dulles brothers – who had represented the Cuban Sugar Cane Co. and United Fruit Co. – as Secretary of State and CIA Director.

When Iran elected a fervent developmentalist President, Mohammad Mossadegh, Eisenhower and the Dulles set out to destroy him and his country, a project that remains a White House priority.


Despite his good image for having "warned us" about the MIC, Eisenhower like all US presidents was an unapologetic meddling imperialist.


Empty calories

Ike’s anti-development policy was called Capitalist Modernization Theory: [According to this], Western societies are inherently progressive in ways older civilizations can never be, and the wealth they generate is distributed unevenly because some people work harder than others. But the only road to economic evolution and social modernization leads through free trade, individual effort and capitalism, and those who stray from the path will be destroyed.

So thorough was the anti-developmentalist campaign that the US carried its attack to the UN, where it blocked all resolutions recognizing food, shelter and national development as human rights. Learning of this a horrified Harold Pinter wrote,

The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to America. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power worldwide while masquerading as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant, even witty, highly successful act of hypnosis. "U.S. foreign policy is best defined as follows: kiss my arse or I’ll kick your head in. It is as simple and as crude as that. What is interesting about it is that it’s so incredibly successful. It possesses the structures of disinformation, use of rhetoric, distortion of language, which are very persuasive, but are actually a pack of lies. It is very successful propaganda. They have the money, they have the technology, they have all the means to get away with it, and they do.” – Nobel Prize lecture, 1958.

To keep developmentalism dormant, the US systematically destroyed developing economies and assassinated defiant leaders. To this day, the Joint Chiefs reassure the nation that they are ready to nuke China for having the audacity to develop its economy.

Enter the Dragon

Maurice Meisner,

Starting with an industrial base smaller than that of Belgium's in 1952, the China that for so long was ridiculed as "the sick man of Asia" emerged at the end of the Mao period as one of the six largest industrial producers in the world, comparable to the industrialization of Germany, Japan, and Russia.

  • In Germany the rate of economic growth 1880-1914 was 33% per decade.

  • In Japan from 1874-1929 the rate of increase per decade was 43%.

  • The Soviet Union from 1928-58 achieved a decadal increase of 54%.

  • In Mao’s China from 1952-72 the decadal rate was 64%.

By maintaining Mao’s breakneck pace for seventy years, China has created the largest and most complete (war-fighting) economy on earth – so resilient that, in the face of embargoes and threats, its trade has grown by $1 trillion under the embargoes and the economy by $1.6 trillion this year alone.


 

Washington’s last stand?

China’s development represents a defeat far more consequential than America’s combined losses in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Ukraine. China not only defied America and developed, but is supplanting it as leader of the world.


Godfree Roberts' SUBSTACK depository is at https://substack.com/@herecomeschina. His bio box can be seen at the bottom of this page. 


Addendum

Even the CIA-redacted Wikipedia accepts, however grudgingly, that China has accomplished  a virtual miracle in a much shorter time than ANY capitalist nation in history thanks to its socialist core. The quote below testifies to this:

[4][5] which still stands in 2022.[6][7][8]

The Chinese definition of extreme poverty is more stringent than that of the World Bank: earning less than $2.30 a day at purchasing power parity (PPP).[9]Growth has fuelled a substantial increase in per-capita income lifting people out of extreme poverty. China's per capita income has increased fivefold between 1990 and 2000, from $200 to $1,000. Between 2000 and 2010, per capita income also rose at the same rate, from $1,000 to $5,000, moving China into the ranks of middle-income countries.

(See Poverty in China, Wikipedia)



Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days. 
[newsletter_form]



All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors. 
YOU ARE FREE TO REPRODUCE THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED YOU GIVE PROPER CREDIT TO THE GREANVILLE POST
VIA A BACK LIVE LINK. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

black-horizontal

 

black-horizontal




•The Tiananmen Story—as it really was. (Part 1)

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. BREAKING THE EMPIRE'S DISINFORMATION MACHINE IS UP TO YOU.



GODFREE ROBERTS



Resize text-+=

 

Tiananmen, Part 1

Prelude to a riot.

 
 
 
 
 

In 1980, with fanfare and high hopes, Deng Xiaoping launched his ‘decade of reform and opening’ and foreign media, businessmen and politicians saw only blue skies. But Deng was unqualified to manage the transition to capitalism – as our media hopefully labeled it – and he resigned before decade’s end. Says Dongpin Han, a student at the time,

Official corruption had disrupted China’s economy. The government, facing bankruptcy, had printed more money in 1984 than in the previous thirty-five years combined. Prices of commodities, previously State-controlled and stable, exploded. Meat rose five hundred percent. My parents had saved two thousand yuan. They’d bought their first house for four hundred yuan then, overnight, their savings lost 90 percent of their value. My mother rushed to the store and bought two hundred feet of plain cloth. Her neighbor bought four hundred pounds of salt and another bought forty TV sets. They believed that war-era inflation had returned and their money would become worthless. People started publicly denouncing corrupt officials and their children’s promotion to high office. Beijing’s Consumer Price Index had jumped 30% in 1988 and salaried workers panicked when they could no longer afford staples. State-owned enterprises were pressured to cut costs. Mao’s iron rice bowl–job security and social benefits ranging from medical care to subsidized housing–were suddenly at risk”. 

Harvard’s Elizabeth Perry:

The Cultural Revolution left a significant mark on popular protests in post-Mao China. Repertoires of collective political action popularized during the Cultural Revolution—such as singing revolutionary songs, marches, rallies, and hunger strikes—had a great impact on the 1989 protest movement. The haunting specter of the Cultural Revolution also had a crucial impact on the Deng regime’s interpretation of—and thereby reaction to—the movement..

The bleak reality of growing socioeconomic disparity, environmental degradation, massive layoffs of workers in state-owned enterprises, evisceration of social protections, rampant official corruption, illicit appropriation of public property, and exploitation of rural migrant labor has led to the unraveling of the broad but fragile consensus regarding the direction and rationality of post-Mao reforms that dominated Chinese intellectual discussions of the 1980s.

Amid soaring inflation, widespread corruption and elite privilege, graduates had found themselves in the worst employment market since the War. Only those with political connections got hired, and then earned less than high school matriculants. Government subsidies and professors’ incomes were slashed and parents, students and faculty demanded⁠ ‘more money for education and higher pay for scholars’. Famed scholar Ding Shisun told an interviewer, “People ask me whether as Beijing University president I fear student protests? I tell them what I fear most is not having enough money,” and students in Tiananmen Square satirically offered to shine congressmens' shoes.

Deng’s withdrawal of Mao’s tuition subsidies crushed the dreams of millions, while his decision to maintain them for African students touched off race riots in Nanjing, where students rampaged through the Africans’ quarters. Beijing students carried banners ("No Offend Chinese Women,” "Kill the foreigners!”), screamed insults at Deng, and marched on Party leaders’ living quarters at Zhongnanhai.  

Workers echoed students’complaints. One explained that everyone in her industry had much less opportunity to participate within the system than in the 1970s, when meetings were called for every problem and people could raise opinions that today would result in their dismissal. By the Fall, State-owned companies had dumped millions of workers into an unprepared labor market, where inflation consumed their six months severance pay in six weeks.

Demands

 

When the deposed Hu Yaobang died suddenly in mid-April, demonstrators released their demands:

  1. Report truthfully all the events from the death of Hu Yaobang to the student demonstrations in Tiananmen Square.

Ten days later, students and workers began massive demonstrations in Beijing and Shanghai, denouncing Deng, “It doesn’t matter if the cat is black or white, so long as the cat resigns”.


Part 2, What About the Workers? will be released soon.

 


The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of  The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience. 

Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days. 
[newsletter_form]



All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors. 
YOU ARE FREE TO REPRODUCE THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED YOU GIVE PROPER CREDIT TO THE GREANVILLE POST
VIA A BACK LIVE LINK. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

black-horizontal

 

black-horizontal

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
It’s super easy! Sign up to receive our FREE bulletin.  Get TGP selections in your mailbox. No obligation of any kind. All addresses secure and never sold or commercialised. 

[newsletter_form]