STEVEN JONAS: Legislated Dictatorship: Coming to a State Near You?

Mitch McConnel, John Boehner, E. Cantor—GOP big whigs.

“The GOP likes to bleat that it is the party of new ideas (although most of them, like “lower taxes” and “smaller government” – except in matters of religious belief and personal choice, of course – are rather old).  Well these ideas — that is legislating dictatorship  — are surely new, both in American history and also on the world stage.  As noted, so far the dictatorial powers achieved legislatively by two state GOP administrations are relatively narrow (although not so for the affected parties).  But they are dictatorial in the sense that the executive branch operates on its own authority, with no checks and balances.  And yes indeed, unlike the powers seized in one way or another by dictators in the past, these weren’t seized militarily or on the authority of a monarch or through a rigged parliament, but were created as the outcome of the democratic process (at least on paper).  One can only say, look out, USA.  Here comes the GOP and it seems to have dictatorship on its mind.”

BY STEVEN JONAS
Crosspost with: http://blog.buzzflash.com/node/12498

There were a number of other dictatorships established in the 20th century in countries ranging from major world powers like Japan to very minor ones, like the land-locked Paraguay.  But none of them arrived on the scene through legitimate parliamentary means.  In the 21st century, in the United States, the scenario for just such an advent of dictatorship may be unfolding, at least at the state/local level.  This is one that bears watching.

These are, to date, state and local government matters and to date they exist in only two GOP-controlled states.  In both states, the laws were arrived through the democratic process.  GOP governors were elected as were GOP-majority legislatures.  But there is apparently much interest in other GOP-controlled states in adopting similar measures, with either greater or lesser scope.  The fact that neither governor ran for office on such platforms would seem to be immaterial.  Most folks pay little attention to electoral platforms anyway unless an opponent picks out a particular feature of it/them and makes an issue of it.

Media Matters boot camp readies liberal policy wonks for the camera’s close-up

By Jason Horowitz, Tuesday, March 22

Media Matters founder David Brock

“I’m here to be intensely trained,” Lee Brenner announced as he came through the door of a discreet building near Dupont Circle.

The brick carriage house is usually the headquarters of the Mathematical Association of America, but for a few days in the middle of March, the left-wing organization Media Matters for America converted it into a partisan boot camp where rebel forces were trained for combat on Fox News. Over four grueling days, Harvard-honed instructors drilled a dozen softie policy wonks, molding them into an elite unit of smiling, succinct and well-coiffed talking heads.

Since its inception in August 2009, the Progressive Talent Initiative, or PTI, has trained nearly 100 pundits who have appeared 800 times on television and radio. Media Matters uses that metric to pitch donors for more contributions, but its leadership believes that the surge of camera-ready liberals has recaptured lost ground in the media wars against conservatives.

“There was a chronic imbalance,” said David Brock, the founder of Media Matters, which picks up the entire cost of the course. “We didn’t just want to accept that this is the way it is.” Brock is a former conservative writer at the American Spectator who was instrumental in efforts to discredit Anita Hill and to oust Bill Clinton, and who made a sharp left turn a decade ago.

The primary mission of Media Matters, he said, is to obsessively monitor Fox News and call attention to its distortions. But now it’s moving into the operational phase, transforming from observers to shock troops. The organization, he said, had to “professionalize the training and booking” of a left-leaning counterpoise.

Media Matters selected the coterie of attractive, articulate participants from 100 applicants, the largest pool so far. All in mid-career, the class included liberal think tank directors, former Capitol Hill staffers and presidential campaign aides, a pollster, a university professor, a combat veteran and contestants from both “American Idol” and “The Apprentice.”

Brenner, a former producer of CNN’s “Late Edition With Wolf Blitzer” and political director at MySpace, had recently founded a digital communications firm called FastFWD Group and an online magazine called HyperVocal.com.

To observe the training, The Post agreed to withhold the names of participants who asked not to be identified, which many of them did when instructors warned that a public alliance with Media Matters could jeopardize their chances of getting booked on Fox. Since Brenner said he had already criticized Fox on the record, he for one was willing to risk alienating “On the Record With Greta Van Susteren.”

Camera practice

On Wednesday morning, Brenner, who has black coiled hair, a pleasant demeanor and a taste for the blazer-and-jeans look, climbed the stairs to perform his “baseline video” hit with instructor John Neffinger.

The Firm” and “Magnolia”), Neffinger had a promising career teaching public speaking to executives, including those who “sold cigarettes to kids,” he said. He abandoned all that for the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard.

I.Q.” during a scene crawling with rhesus monkeys.)

After John Kerry’s 2004 presidential campaign, the three Democrats decided to use their gifts for communication to rescue their ailing party.

“I’m not going to play gotcha with you,” Neffinger said to Brenner as he directed him to a seat in front of a video camera. “What’s your issue area?”

Brenner explained that his firm dealt with new-media journalism.

“Joining us now to talk new media is Democratic strategist Lee Brenner,” Neffinger boomed in character.

“Thanks for having me,” Brenner said. And suddenly, the interview didn’t go so well. The corners of Brenner’s mouth tended to twitch on the way to a smile. But Neffinger accentuated the positive, especially the sign-off, when Brenner looked most at ease. “As we like to say,” he said, “you stuck the landing.”

Brenner joined the other participants in a wood-paneled room on the carriage house’s ground floor. A camcorder stood on a tripod in the middle of desks arranged in a horseshoe formation. Black and white boards hung on the walls. Brock, with graying hair and blue tie, offered some words of wisdom to the class. Their conservative antagonists had all gone through rigorous media training at the Leadership Institute, he warned, but now they, too, would be armed with the ammunition to compete.

Pendleton took the floor.

“You are going to be challenged. You are going to be exhausted. You are going to be frustrated,” he said, before surveying the group about how they felt when they went on television.

“I tend to get dry, so I need to hydrate,” Brenner said to the class. “Hydrate. Pee. Call my mom.”

‘Liberal’ associations

The problem for the soldiers of the left, according to Media Matters instructors, is that they are just too smart for their own good. The traditional dependence on facts and figures, on being right, is no longer germane. Too often these wonks disappear into the policy weeds or fall through the cracks of nuance.

Taylor West, now a communications director for National Journal, in which her good-natured teasing bested a conservative expert on Web security. She knew virtually nothing about the issue and crammed for the interview in the makeup chair.

The Political Brain.” Westen, wearing a boxy jacket, glasses and suspenders, showed examples of the right’s genius for branding (from “government takeover” to “death taxes”) and the left’s relative ineptitude. Westen said that the tea party’s “populist message, tinged with racism” was effective and offered a quote from Al Gore as “the absolute worst in progressive communication.”

As Brenner sipped tea, Westen pontificated about the similarities between human and sheep brains and then conducted some psychological experiments on the class to demonstrate “a heightened state of latent activation in your brain.” To emphasize the point, he played a Fox News clip, showing anchor Shepard Smith accidentally referencing a sex act in a segment about Jennifer Lopez. As the class chirped, Westen observed that while “it couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy,” the clip revealed that certain words and images triggered powerful, and usually unspoken, thoughts in the viewer’s mind.

The word “Liberal” then appeared on the screen, surrounded by “elite,” “big government,” “sushi-eating” and “latte-drinking.” Westen explained that the “right has spent 40 years and tens of billions of dollars” tarnishing the once-proud label. “In this room, it’s like: Feminism and lesbianism? Yeah!” he observed approvingly. But TV watchers elsewhere don’t feel the same. In short, anything “liberal” fires the wrong synapses.

“For the average person,” Westen said, “this is not a good network to be activating.”

After a lunch of Cajun chicken and shrimp, the participants returned to a classroom bursting with the energy of Kohut, Neffinger and Pendleton, the “KNP Boys” as Westen called them. The class leaders tossed markers and exclaimed, “Let’s diagram this!” They projected an image of a middle-aged woman — one of the instructor’s aunts, grinning in a kitchen — and then explained that the entire point of the course was to win over swing-voting aunts nationwide.

The key, they explained, was to ooze likability and reasonableness, and make their opponents seem otherwise. A talk-show host acts as a proxy for the viewer, they counseled, so it was critical to maintain a good rapport.

“Even if you are failing on a number of levels,” Pendleton said, all is not lost “if you have forward energy.”

Neffinger cautioned the class that Fox hosts would treat them as predictable liberals. “And so, as they say in the theater,” he said, “you are playing against type.”

Brenner volunteered to take the hot seat.

“Twitter, tweeter, what does it all mean?” Pendleton asked condescendingly.

“When I started working at MySpace,” said Brenner, trying to draw a connection with the woman in the kitchen, “I didn’t even have a MySpace page.”

The instructors explained that referencing MySpace might be a bit esoteric.

“Should I start with how Murdoch owned MySpace?” Brenner asked.

The participants spent the rest of the afternoon being grilled by instructors who, with pitch-perfect Bill O’Reilly bombast, called them callous for refusing to intervene in Libya, cowards for cutting-and-running in Afghanistan, profligate for defending government spending and out of touch for putting religious tolerance above the war on terror. In response, the participants practiced their media martial arts.

Brenner nodded in knowing agreement as the class learned that journalists were conflict-seeking showmen, easily disarmed by the use of their first names or compliments on the cleverness of their questions. The participants became adept in the craft of the pivot and setting up far-left straw men to make their own left-leaning positions seem more moderate. They jotted their talking points on Media Matters envelopes and heard about the supremacy of storytelling.

“A good story is a Trojan horse,” said Pendleton, to “deploy your ideas.”

Once the horse is inside the walls, “gut everyone,” Neffinger said, stabbing the air.

‘Be the bad guy’

Roger Ailes, the president of Fox News, has said he watches television with the sound off to better judge talent. Media Matters, too, is embracing the notion of television debate as performance art. The PTI program is in part conceived by Joel Silberman, a Democratic media trainer and former cabaret singer, who says things like “actors speak louder than words,” “heart, persona, presence” and “feeling wins.” The instructors at the carriage house spend an entire day emphasizing “nonverbals.”

The participants studied “strength and warmth inventory” handouts (“furrowed brow” for strength, “brow up” for warmth). They learned to avoid licking lips, tilting heads and rubbing one hand against the other. Even a benign tic can read sinister on-screen. “Paper covers rock” is the safest hands-at-rest position.

A day after his first go-round, Brenner switched his subject to foreign aid and again underwent questioning by Neffinger, who was adopting the persona of an NPR interlocutor. Before they began, Brenner put one leg in front of the other in a seated runner’s stance and puffed his chest forward. He exuded greater confidence and offered more concise answers. Then, suddenly, the talking-points envelope on his lap slipped through his legs and onto the floor. His shoulders grew tight, his concentration faltered.

“This stance was starting to get uncomfortable,” Brenner explained to Neffinger after the interview. He said he had needed to move his left leg forward “another three inches.”

“You got, like, a cramp?” Neffinger asked.

“I was holding it, and I was like, ‘Okay, am I shaking here?’ It was like I was in gym class.”

Neffinger handed Brenner his digital chip, which kept track of all his interviews. He walked into the hallway and inserted it into one of several laptops on which participants studied their own faces.

“The posture wasn’t great,” Brenner self-assessed. “And I need a haircut.”

Brenner descended the stairs to his next station on the ground floor, where Pendleton conducted panel discussions. “This is going to be Fox-esque,” Pendleton said. “This is going to be that silly game they play of two-on-one.”

After a few turns, the participants demonstrated more ease and effectiveness playing the conservative role. “Any actor will tell you,” Pendleton explained, “it’s more fun to be the bad guy.”

At day’s end, the instructors imparted the dark art of using kindness to trap an opponent. Trapping is “something you just don’t trot out your first time on TV,” Kohut said. It’s an advanced maneuver, Neffinger said, “that will get you on the front of HuffPo.” After another hour of practice, the class recessed into the drizzle. Some stuck around to “brainstorm on structural racism.”

Projecting the persona

On the last day, trainees donned their best clothes to appear at IMG studios, south of Dupont Circle. Pendleton complimented the color of dresses and the sharpness of suits. Brenner wore a powder-blue power tie. His hair was freshly trimmed. As Matthew White, the program assistant, helped him and a handful of other participants mold their very own puttylike “interruptible feedback” earpieces, former MSNBC anchor David Shuster was revealed as the special guest who would now put the participants through a real-world simulation.

After a breakfast of muffins in the studio kitchen, Brenner received a dusting of foundation in the makeup chair. He then posed for head shots down the hall and returned to the kitchen to work on his talking-points envelope.

In the upper left-hand corner, he scribbled “David” for the host’s name and in the middle drew a smiley face to remind him to grin. Among his talking points, he listed “penny on the dollar” and then some stats.

Pendleton took him aside for a last-minute pep talk.

Brenner said he was working on cranking up his warmth and that he was most at ease projecting a “reasonable” persona. He reminisced about his early days in Washington, when he would tell his father about all the politicians and media celebrities he had met. “Do you get how cool it is?” he recalled his father asking him.

“You talking about that right now? The warmth!” cheered Pendleton. “Remember the words of your dad. Cool. This is fun.”

Brenner and his comrades gathered in the control room, where Kelly Ronan, the Media Matters chief of staff, took notes on each performance. The group, too, conducted a running commentary on the interviews. “Book him, Kelly!” one participant yelled after the combat veteran in the group delivered a personal account of why the United States needed to withdraw from Afghanistan. “Book him!”

“Lee, you’re on deck,” said Ronan to Brenner.

He stepped out into the hall, where another participant hopped and waved his arms under the blinking “Studio in Use” light. Pendleton took Brenner aside and whispered, “Remember what your dad told you.”

Shuster asked how Brenner could advocate foreign aid during a budget crisis.

“Well, David,” he replied evenly, “I understand everyone is hurting” and went on to calmly explain that foreign aid pays for medicines for children and early warning systems for tsunamis. In a second round, Shuster hammed it up as an aggressive Fox host and asked Brenner, “Why do you love the children of Africa more than the children of Alabama?”

“I want it to say ‘Made in America’ on medicines rather than bombs,” Brenner replied coolly.

“Ooooh,” the participants in the control room hummed approvingly. “Did he have that in the can?” one asked.

“He did,” nodded Kohut.

Media Matters staff handed out feedback forms and told the group about a listserv where policy pointers, last-minute on-screen tutorials and moral support were at their fingertips. The organization was even in the process of hiring its own booking agent to more strategically deploy their talent.

“We’re really working to get you guys booked,” said White, the program assistant. “Because America needs you.”

horowitzj@washpost.com




INDECENT SLIMEBALLS: Paul LePage, Governor of Maine

Note: This is a special category of people who, knowing the ravages of poverty, rise to fortune, and like many self-made people, waste no time in thinking (a) that anyone (!) can do the same; or (b) that the “losers” deserve what they get (or rather, don’t get).  The empathetic imagination is sorely lacking in these individuals. They make instant common cause with other millionaires and zillionaires at the top. The idea that wealth and poverty are two sides of the same coin is alien to their narrow, mean-spirited  minds.  Obviously, by a large margin, they’re at home in the Republican party, which has long specialized in enemies of the people like this, but Democrats also have their share of indecents.—P. Greanville

HUFFPOST REPORTING

Maine Gov. Paul LePage Orders Removal Of Labor Mural From State Agency
By Amanda Terkelaterkel@huffingtonpost.com

First Posted: 03/23/11 01:17 PM Updated: 03/23/11 01:17 PM

On Tuesday, Maine DOL Acting Commissioner Laura Boyett sent out an e-mail saying that after some complaints from businesses, the mural would be removed. Additionally, the state would be renaming eight conference rooms, many of which commemorate former labor leaders and one honoring the first female U.S. Cabinet secretary.

perceived as equally receptive to both businesses and workers — primarily because of the nature of the mural in the lobby and the names of our conference rooms,” wrote Boyett in the e-mail, posted by Maine blog Dirigo Blue. “Whether or not the perception is valid is not really at issue and therefore, not open to debate. If either of our two constituencies perceives that they are not welcome in our administration building and this translates to a belief that their needs will not be heard or met by this department, then it presents a barrier to achieving our mission.”

The mural was erected in 2008, as The Lewiston Sun-Journal notes, after the Maine Arts Commission chose Taylor through a jury selection.

raising the retirement age for some state workers and eventually capping cost-of-living adjustments for retirees in an effort to address the state’s fiscal situation.

List of the rooms that are up for a name change:

  • Able ME Room (DOL program)
  • César Chávez Room (labor leader)
  • William Looney Room (politician)
  • Marianne Martin Room (labor commissioner)
  • Frances Perkins Room (first U.S. Labor Secretary and first female Cabinet member)
  • Rose Schneiderman Room (labor leader)
  • Charles Scontras Room (labor historian)
  • Sarah Wilson Room

•••••

BONUS FEATURE
The same LePage as seen by the establishment

Forbes Focus

Ready For Business

Steven Bertoni, 12.30.10, 11:20 AM EST

Forbes Magazine dated January 17, 2011

LePage

He should be great for Maine if he can overcome the progressives who are doing everything they can to sabotage him.

Vermont poised to abolish most forms of private health insurance

Vermont’s Single-Payer Salvation

The Green Mountain State is poised to abolish most forms of private health insurance.
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/7052/vermonts_single-payer_salvation/

By LAUREN ELSE | NEWS » MARCH 18, 2011

THREE WEEKS AFTER the House of Representatives voted to repeal last year’s landmark healthcare reform legislation, and one week after a federal judge ruled the bill’s insurance mandate unconstitutional, Vermont’s leaders decided to take matters into their own hands.

On February 8, newly inaugurated Democratic Gov. Peter Shumlin unveiled his plan for a publicly funded single-payer healthcare system, which was introduced into the state’s legislature. If enacted, which appears likely, it will be the first system of its kind in the United States and Vermont would become the first state to abolish most forms of private health insurance.

“In five years, I predict the United States will go through another major debate of how to reform the healthcare system,” Harvard School of Public Health Professor William Hsiao told the state’s legislators in January, noting his belief that the federal reform legislation passed in March 2010 will not solve the nation’s healthcare crisis. “The question for Vermont is, do you want to walk ahead of the United States? Do you want to be a model for the United States?”

Last year, lawmakers passed a bill to hire a team of consultants led by Hsiao—an economist who helped to develop universal healthcare plans in China and reform Medicare and Medicaid in the 1970s—to design a new healthcare system for the Green Mountain State. According to Hsiao’s research, about 32,000 people, or roughly five percent of the state’s population, would still be uninsured after federal reform measures take full effect in 2014. (Fifty seven thousand, or 9 percent, of Vermonters are currently uninsured.)

What Hsiao and his team ended up recommending to the state was a single-payer system that would ensure coverage for all residents. An independent public body would oversee the system and contract out administration of all claims. Private insurers could compete for this work, as they have done for years to administer the state’s Medicare program. The bill, currently in committee, would take an estimated three to six years to implement.

“I know what I’m going to present is not necessarily popular for everyone,” Hsiao said as he began his January presentation in Montpelier. “A health system is a complex system.” The annual savings that would be created by the system, however, do appear to be popular among lawmakers and public officials. Hsiao’s team estimates the single-payer system could save the state at least $580 million yearly, or $1.2 billion by 2019, and create 4,000 jobs because the burden of rising healthcare costs would be lifted from businesses.

On February 24, the Republican Mayor Christopher Louras, of Rutland, urged the state to adopt the single-payer legislation, noting that more than a third of the city’s $7 million annual payroll is consumed by healthcare costs. “The only way to fix the problem is to blow it up and start over,” Louras said.

The introduction of the healthcare bill comes in the first months of Democratic Gov. Peter Shumlin’s first term in office, which follows eight years of Republican rule under Gov. Jim Douglas. Shumlin supported a single-payer healthcare system during his campaign, calling Vermont’s current system “broken.” Anya Rader Wallack, the special assistant to Shumlin on healthcare, cited waste and “craziness” as factors troubling the state’s current healthcare system during testimony before Vermont House and Senate committees on February 8. Three private insurance carriers operate in Vermont, along with Medicare and Medicaid and various suppliers of workers’ compensation insurance, a structure Wallack called “misguided.”

Dr. Deborah Richter, president of Vermont for Single Payer, which has advocated for a new health system since 2003, says that “on the whole” the group supports Hsiao’s plan. “Estimates are that [Hsiao’s system] will not only be able to cover everybody, but for less money,” Richter says. “Vermont is uniquely poised to get this done.”

Hsiao seems optimistic. “I can say with full confidence that your broken system can be fixed,” Hsiao counseled Vermont lawmakers. “But we require you to…adopt the right solution.”

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!

BONUS FEATURE

Docs Willing To Move To Vermont For Single Payer System

March 22, 2011 | 12:01 PM | By Rachel Zimmerman

Some doctors say they’re willing to move to Vermont if a single payer system is enacted

More than 200 doctors from 39 states and the District of Columbia say they’d consider moving to Vermont if that state switches to a publicly financed single-payer health care system, according affiliates of Physicians for a National Health Program, an organization of physicians who advocate for single-payer national health insurance.

Many of the doctors mulling a move are in primary care, according to the Vermont chapter of the physician’s group, and while most are from nearby states, doctors from California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii also said they’d consider moving to Vermont under a single-payer system.

The group asked physicians from around the nation to sign an open letter to the Vermont Legislature in support of the single-payer plan. Doctors could also check a box if they would consider moving to Vermont if a single payer system was enacted.

Dr. Rachel Nardin, a neurologist at Cambridge Health Alliance, is one of them. She said the current health care system, even with the reforms in Massachusetts, is so demoralizing, she would strongly consider leaving Massachusetts for Vermont if that state had a single-payer system.

“Practicing medicine in our current system is wretched,” Dr. Nardin said in an interview. “Instead of caring for people, we’re fighting with insurers to get what we need for our patients — it’s depressing. For the chance to just care for patients, and not have these fights, sure I’d move.”

Dr. Nardin, who is also co-chair of Massachusetts Physicians for a National Health Program, said she recently cared for an uninsured woman with Lou Gehrig’s disease, a progressive neurodegenerative disorder also known as ALS. “Because she had no insurance, I couldn’t get her a hospital bed, or a wheelchair, I couldn’t get her the most effective medication, I couldn’t get her anything that would maintain her dignity,” Dr. Nardin said. “It is so unnecessarily cruel.” (Ultimately, the patient received help from a private charity.)

“The beauty of single payer,” Dr. Nardin said, “is that people have insurance from cradle to grave and when you get sick, you can worry about being sick and how to get better, you don’t have to worry about how you’re going to pay for care.”

Here’s another Mass. doctor, Suzanne King of Lenox, advocating for the Vermont single payer plan in an opinion piece in The Berkshire Eagle today.




Riz Khan – Attacking the US middle class? Future of organized labor. Discussion w. Ralph Nader.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZCucOQgQWY[/youtube]

US Uncut protesters gather to demonstrate their revulsion at Bank of America's ability to avoid paying a fair share of taxes.