Stepping Back from the Precipice

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


OLIVER BOYD-BARRETT


Resize text-+=

The connection you find at the end of this paragraph is to an interview in which Kevin Barrett and I talk about the scaremongering this week about whether the US and UK were about to announce that they would give the OK to Ukrainian use of precision-guided long-range missiles on targets deep in Russia. I think it is worth listening to.

!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/uukz21"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble");

 

Rumble("play", {"video":"v5cl7ky","div":"rumble_v5cl7ky"});

Oliver Boyd-Barrett on Greenlighting Escalation Towards WW3


The absence of democracy and hypocrisy throughout the collective West is more than obvious now, as the populations in these countries have not been consulted about an escalation toward WW3, which they would naturally not approve.

Note that there have been uses of Storm Shadows, Scalps and perhaps ATACMS, especially against Crimea and other parts of the Novorussiya battlefields in the past. But we have been led of late by the US Secretary of State, Tony Blinken, and the UK Foreign Secretary, David Lammy to expect something far more extensive. This is in response to long-standing requests from Ukraine [a puppet state micromanaged by the US]for such permission. Nobody serious believes that Ukraine is capable of using these machines without the considerable support and participation of the NATO powers themselves.

ORWELL 2.0
Western politicians, in the service of invisible oligarchs, are pushing for a catastrophic war for no conceivable good reason.  A massively disinformed public is unable to respond to this manufactured threat. 

Not until after my interview with Barrett (see above) did I get the chance to listen to a conversation between Judge Napolitano, Ray McGovern and Larry Johnson, from which I understand that both John Kirby for the State Department and the office of UK prime minister Keither Starmer had indicated before Starmer’s visit yesterday to the White House to meet US President Biden had said that there would be no formal announcement that same day. Kirby had even said that the White House was listening carefully and taking seriously the statement of Russian President Putin on Thursday in which Putin told the West that any decision that would allow Ukraine to use these long-range missiles would be regarded by Russia as direct involvement by NATO in a war against Russia and that Russia would respond.

The tone in today’s New York Times is far more cautious than of late, indicating that Washington and London are stepping back from the brink - at least, for now:

“…the president remains deeply fearful of setting off a dangerous, wider conflict…But the decision now facing Mr. Biden after Friday’s closed-door meeting at the White House… could be far more consequential than previous concessions by the president that delivered largely defensive weapons to Ukraine during the past two and a half years…Mr. Biden has hesitated to allow Ukraine to use arms provided by the United States in the same way over fears that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia would see it as a major escalation.

“John F. Kirby, the national security spokesman at the White House, said Friday that the Biden administration takes Mr. Putin’s threats seriously because he has proved himself capable of “aggression” and “escalation.” But Mr. Kirby added that there had been no change in Mr. Biden’s opposition to letting Ukraine use U.S. missiles to strike deep inside Russia.

“There is no change to our view on the provision of long-range strike capabilities for Ukraine to use inside Russia, and I wouldn’t expect any sort of major announcement in that regard coming out of the discussions, certainly not from our side,” he said.

“The second American concern is a practical one: Pentagon officials do not believe Ukraine has enough of the ATACMS, the British Storm Shadow and the French SCALP missiles to make a strategic difference on the battlefield. The reach of the missiles, they note, is well known — and Russia has already moved its most valuable aircraft beyond the range the missiles can fly.

“Moreover, the U.S. officials say, they simply cannot supply many more to Ukraine. The Pentagon has warned that it must keep a healthy reserve of weapons in case of an outbreak of fighting in either Europe or Asia. And the missiles are so expensive that they contend Ukraine could get more firepower putting that money into drones”.

https://rumble.com/v5ewc3u-oliver-boyd-barrett-on-greenlighting-escalation-towards-ww3.html


Subscribe to Empire, Communication and NATO Wars

By Oliver Boyd-Barrett · Launched 3 years ago
Critiques of Propaganda and Pretexts for War, by Oliver Boyd-Barrett

 


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Nyet Means Nyet

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Billy Bob's Blowback Roundtable
THE WORLD THROUGH AN INDEPENDENT LEFT LENS


Resize text-+=



The Lies of Burns and Moore

The Chiefs of MI6 And CIA Publish A Statement of Lies.

(This article was first published on New Eastern Outlook on September 12, 2024. It is reposted here since it has been removed from Facebook by the American censors.)

On September 7 the British and American chiefs of their secret intelligence services, Richard Moore and William Burns, released an op-ed piece in the Financial Times and, on that day took part in a live talk hosted by the same journal.  They had one common objective, to lie to their peoples and the world about the real causes of the violence and insecurity in the world, to provide them with the pretext for their attempt to rule the world.  In other words they openly displayed the conspiracy of their governments to commit aggression against anyone in the world who resists them, the supreme war crime.

Criminal actions ignored by the ICC

The criminal case for conspiracy to commit aggression can be built easily against the USA and UK from their op-ed and their interview. So let’s examine what they wrote and said for they condemned themselves out of their own mouths.  But they began their op-ed piece with this strange statement,

The facts of history distorted and denied.

Which branch of US intelligence was working with British intelligence in 1909 is not stated, but it is a complete mystery what state-on-state violence in Europe these two are referring to that occurred in 1909.  History reveals none.  But it is with this historical fantasy that they begin their propaganda piece. It gets worse from there.

They go on to refer to the close collaboration between Britain and the USA in WWI, WWII and the so called war on terrorism, in fact, their war of terrorism to try to take over the oil and other mineral supplies of the middle east and central Asia. History tells us that in fact the British and Americans were just as much rivals all through those wars as collaborators, and were often at odds on how to conduct those wars and to reap the benefits. Since Britain lost its empire right after WWII, and the Americans took over their dominance of the world, the British have been subservient to the Americans. American forces are still stationed there. They were not liked in Britain during WWII and they are not liked now. The common saying in Britain about the Americans during WWII, which reflected public feeling at the time, was that, “There are three things wrong with Americans. They are over paid, over sexed, and over here.”  That is still the opinion of many.

As for the hard struggle against terrorism, they really refer to their wars on Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, wars against sovereign states and peoples to steal and loot their resources and markets.  The terrorism was theirs.

Their war against Ukraine and Russia, the World

They continue with this statement,

“The CIA and SIS stand together in resisting an assertive Russia and Putin’s war of aggression (sic) in Ukraine. We saw it coming, and were able to warn the international community so we could all rally to Ukraine’s defence. We carefully declassified some of our secrets as a new and effective part of this effort.”

Of course they saw it coming. They were the ones that engineered the war against Russia by expanding their NATO alliance east towards Russia in betrayal of their promises made to Russia not to do so, an obvious act of aggression, and then attacked Yugoslavia in 1999, to remove a potential Russian ally and to place their large military base, Camp Bondsteel in the Serbian heartland of Kosovo-Metohija. The attack on Yugoslavia, a brutal act of aggression, during which they also attacked China, was a phase of their war against Russia.

Their wars of aggression continued with the NATO organised coup in Ukraine of 2014, in which they overthrew the elected president and installed a gang of Nazi cutthroats in his place which immediately began an armed attack on the peoples of the eastern regions of Ukraine who refused to accept the coup or the Nazis who seized power.  The UK and US and their allies, fuelled this conflict, promoted it, provided arms and encouragement for it and are complicit in all the war crimes committed against those peoples all through the ten years since.  It was put an end to this aggression against those peoples and the threat is represented to Russia itself that Russia finally decided to enter into the conflict to put an end to it.  This is the aggression, of the US and UK, not Russia.

Secrets Revealed

As for the secrets they revealed, they must be referring to Victoria Nuland’s admission that the British and Americans told Zelensky to renege on the peace deal Ukraine and Russia had concluded in Istanbul in the spring of 2022 and to carry on the war against the Russians.  Zelensky seemed to have been carried away with his campaign promise to bring peace to Ukraine and had to be brought into line. Or maybe they are referring to Angela Merkel’s admission that the Minsk Accords, which were backed by the UN Security Council and in which President Putin put so much effort to make work, was just a ruse used to fool the Russians while NATO built up Ukraine’s army to attack Russia.

Their Propaganda

They continue with this,

“Staying the course is more vital than ever. Putin will not succeed in extinguishing Ukraine’s sovereignty and independence. Russia’s actions are a flagrant breach of the UN Charter and global norms.”

It is the UK and the USA that have extinguished Ukraine’s sovereignty and independence with the overthrow of democracy in Ukraine reducing it to their puppet state. All their actions were and are illegal and in violation of the UN Charter, whereas Russia’s actions were and are in conformity with Article 51 of the UN Charter.

They then meander off to talk about how technology is changing the war in Ukraine. What this has to do with their intentions and objectives is not clear nor why they made this frankly absurd statement since Russia has demonstrated its superiority in technology on the battlefield and has revealed that NATO weapons are just so much junk to be destroyed as soon as they are used.

NATO Sabotage

Next they state,

“Beyond Ukraine, we continue to work together to disrupt the reckless campaign of sabotage across Europe being waged by Russian intelligence, and its cynical use of technology to spread lies and disinformation designed to drive wedges between us.”

Such cynicism and outright lying is difficult comprehend when the entire world knows that it was the USA and UK that blew up the Nord Stream gas pipeline cutting off Germany and Europe from cheap natural gas supplies, an act of sabotage unequalled anywhere and they do not refer to any Russian sabotage for which there is no evidence whatsoever. As for lies and disinformation, well we know where the lies and disinformation come from.

The Threat Against China

Then they state that,

“In the 21st century, crises don’t come sequentially. While significant attention and resources are being deployed against Russia, we are acting together in other places and spaces to counter the risk of global instability.”

It is true that they are throwing everything they have short of nuclear weapons against Russia, and even threaten to use them as well. The claim they are countering global instability is unconscionable when it is they that have caused most of the wars in the world since 1945 and are causing them now.  But the real meaning of their statement appears in the next paragraph of their op-ed when they state,

“For both the CIA and SIS, the rise of China is the principal intelligence and geopolitical challenge of the 21st century, and we have reorganised our services to reflect that priority. Meanwhile, counterterrorism remains core to our partnership, and we work closely with others to protect our homelands and thwart the resurgent threat of Isis.”

What can one say about such a preposterous statement?  China is a challenge? To who, and in what way? They don’t tell us, because China is a threat to no one except the US industrialists and financiers who seek to dominate the world. British industry is declining fast, and not because of the success of China in rebuilding its economy, but because of internal contradictions in Britain, its loss of empire and cheap resources and labour power. The Americans constantly talk about free enterprise and competition in the market, but they don’t believe a word of it. It’s all dust to obscure the fact that they do not want any competition, and free enterprise to them means the complete dominance of the world economy by their companies.

As for the “resurgent threat of ISIS” again what are they talking about? It is an open secret that they created and controlled ISIS and use its vaporous existence as a pretext to invade and occupy Syria and Iraq, both illegal and brutal occupations in defiance of international law which continue to this day.

Phony Peace in the Middle East

But they continue with their lies when they claim they are seeking peace in the Middle East, while supporting the on-going Israeli genocide against the Palestinians. But Israel was partly their creation, their cat’s paw in the region. Its existence is essential for their attempt to dominate the region and they could care not care less how many people are killed by the Zionist war machine so long as that dominance is maintained. And so they push for a greater war with Iran. They are not seeking “de-escalation” but escalation, just as they are in Ukraine.

After more chaff about artificial intelligence, thrown in for no other reason but to make the op-ed piece long enough to be published and to obscure the lies that fill the rest of it, they end with,

Their Threat To Global Security

“There is no question that the international world order — the balanced system that has led to relative peace and stability and delivered rising living standards, opportunities and prosperity — is under threat in a way we haven’t seen since the cold war. But successfully combating this risk is at the very foundation of our special relationship. Trust, openness, constructive challenge, friendship. These characteristics can be relied upon into the next century, as can our shared determination to remain champions for global peace and security.”

What balance system are they talking about? They have both engaged in one war after another throughout the world since they stepped onto the world stage. Their constant aggressions against the peoples of the world have been a catastrophe for human development and progress. It is they and their wars that have held back the development of world society.  And living standards in the West are declining and have been since the fall of the Soviet Union, since the capitalists of the West found it no longer necessary to offer their workers something to make their lives easier to award off the threat of socialist revolutions in the West.

They Must Be Held Accountable

And what is their “world order” but a structure of war and violence, of chaos, of brutality, maintained by more wars and threats of wars, a destruction of international law, of the principles enshrined in the UN Charter. These men and their governments are not champions of global peace and security. They are the architects of world destruction, and it is clear they are willing to risk another world war and the death of us all to get their way so irrational have they become. They use deception and smooth words to try to fool humanity but they have failed.  They are exposed. They must be condemned, and held accountable for their crimes, before it is too late and there is no one to hold them accountable.


Christopher Black is a widely respected Canadian lawyer and activist involved in international law issues, free speech and human rights defence, and peace activities. 

News 2739
  • If you approve of this article, please share it with your friends and kin.
  • Help us expand our reach. Defeat appalling hypocrisy. Lies cost countless lives.
  • We must act together to smash the VILE Western disinformation machine.
  • This is the Lying Machine that protects the greatest evil humanity has ever seen.
  • YOU know what we are talking about.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE
Billy Bob is a dedicated anti-imperialist activist and blogger. He hosts the Blowback roundatable.  You can reach him at his Facebook page HERE.


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 


[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Prof. Mohammad Marandi: Israel DESTROYED as Iran, Hezbollah, and Regional Allies Wreck IDF, and more

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Danny Haiphong


Resize text-+=




Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




The US Political Duopoly’s Ridiculous (and Useless) “Debate” & Jill Stein’s Sane Response

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Edited by Patrice Greanville


Resize text-+=


Full Debate: Harris vs. Trump in 2024 Presidential Debate | WSJ
Streamed live on Sep 10, 2024
Join Jill Stein, Green Party presidential candidate, for a live response to ABC's debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump on Tuesday September 10th!


P. GREANVILLE—We publish the whole uber-ballyhooed debate between the duopoly's actors, Trump and Harris, whose disgraceful lack of substance is matched by their lack of independent agency and morality, each trying to outgun the other in imperialist machismo and bloodlust, not to mention complete absence of actual solutions to the problems afflicting the US and the world. These enormous flaws, personal and systemic of the duopoly's figureheads, are underscored by Jill Stein's intelligent analysis of the political situation, and the sensible requisite policies that will heal a nation tearing itself apart.

 

SPECIAL ADDENDUM


Jill Stein EXPLAINS Two Party System CORRUPTION


Sabby Sabs
Premiered Jun 9, 2022

 


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




OUR FUTURE: Arrest & Brutalization Of British Journalist Sarah Wilkinson Reveals We Are Dropping Into Legal Dystopia

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Mark Taylor
demockracy


Resize text-+=

OUR FUTURE: Arrest & Brutalization Of British Journalist Sarah Wilkinson Reveals We Are Dropping Into Legal Dystopia

George Galloway interviews Sarah Wilkinson

 

Waking up to the brutal reality we now confront and seeing it clearly for what it is, is the first necessary act of resistance.
By Mark Taylor

DeMOCKracy.ink (9/13/24)

As bad as the recent home invasion and arrest of British Journalist and human rights activist Sarah Wilkinson was, it is clear something extremely insidious is happening. In this interview with British former Member of Parliament George Galloway, Wilkinson describes the brutality and wanton destructiveness of the home invasion, Gestapo-like (Mossad-like) interrogation and clearly intended state terrorism.

Confiscation of her phone, laptop and all electronic devices was not enough. The dozen ‘police’ — some plainclothes wearing identity-shielding balaclavas — stole her passport and the money she had with it Her home was ransacked and even the urn containing her mother’s ashes was emptied out onto the floor.

The kind of desecration of the dead Palestinians are all too familiar with.

What prompted such police state terror?

 
  • Planning to overthrow the government?
    Plotting a terror attack?
    Making bombs in the basement?

She was handcuffed so tightly they cut her wrists and, she notes, “I lost the circulation in my fingers.”

She was thrown into a police van which then drove in the wrong direction of the nearby police station in Shrewsbury. She was in the car for almost 90 minutes as it drove further into the countryside, passing numerous signed turn-offs back into town.

“There was a point in this arrest where I thought, God these aren't police. We're going the wrong way so there was an element of terror in the fact that we drove probably about 30 miles the wrong way,” Wilkinson recalls. “There was a point that I thought that this is an execution. So, yes, I was quite relieved actually to see the police station.”

As this was going on, ‘police’ — and whatever other goons were involved — ransacked and looted her home.

Who were these thugs?


Meanwhile, the nature of the intimidation and threat at the police station was a different kind of abuse, and a different kind of interrogation.

“The interrogation was extraordinarily racist,” Wilkinson explained. “There was a point where I had to break the ‘no comment’ and say ‘I'm sorry but this line of questioning is extraordinarily racist.’

“It didn't feel like British police questioning. We're a multicultural society so to ask questions like ‘why do you think Palestinians are better than us?’, ‘why do you think they're better than white people?’, ‘why aren't white people as good as Palestinians?’ For me, it felt like non-British questioning.”

She was threatened with 5-15 years in prison for refusing to divulge pass codes and PIN numbers for her electronic devices. Because many of her news sources are Palestinians, physicians in Gaza and activists, she refused to provide any of that information, knowing their identification could lead to their imprisonment or — more likely — death.

Numerous police protocols were broken, and, she said, the local Shrewsbury police seemed a little confused by the whole affair. They released her, under seven bail conditions, including not using any phone or computer or any other kind of electronic communication device.

As Galloway notes, “She became the first person in 2024 to be told she could never use a telephone or never use a computer again.”

What it was really about

“I actually don't think they ever intended this to go to court. This was about terrorizing not just me as a civilian in my own home this was [about] terrorizing [of critics].”

There are more details of Wilkinson’s ordeal in the video below, but the thing that stands out to me is, the armed thugs who arrested Wilkinson and wantonly desecrated and ransacked her home were not regular police. Perhaps Israeli Mossad or Shin Bet, as Wilkinson says. Certainly the local Shrewsbury police out of the loop. I doubt the terror team were even all British.

If you think such governmental terrorism will be limited to Great Britain, I have a genocide to tell you about.

As I noted in yesterday’s post “Speaking Of Cats...The Cat That Ate America”, we are in a whole different governmental landscape.

The terror attack on Wilkinson is a signal flare for those paying attention.

Waking up to the brutal reality we now confront and seeing it clearly for what it is, is the first necessary act of resistance.


SARAH WILKINSON INTERVIEW: ‘This was purely for terror’

By George Galloway

The Mother of All Talk Shows (9/13/24)

‘This didn’t feel like British police questioning. More like Mossad or Shin Bet.’ Palestine activist Sarah Wilkinson on how balaclava’d ‘gorillas’ - no warrant or ID shown - ransacked her home, stole money and brutalised her.

26-minute video

Thanks for reading DeMOCKracy.ink • Subscribe for free to receive new posts and original free-use cartoons, illustrations and photos to help you with your good work to create — finally — a humane nation.


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS