Houndsmen are convicted by video in Maine & worried in Indiana

 

From ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 2012:

Houndsmen are convicted by video in Maine & worried in Indiana

Randall Carl of Knox testifying at his own trial.

BELFAST, Maine; LINTON, Indiana–A Superior Court jury in Waldo County, Maine on April 23, 2012 deliberated for less than an hour before convicting Randall Carl of Knox, 46, of aggravated cruelty for setting four bluetick coonhounds on an illegally trapped and tethered bobcat in February 2009. The bobcat was killed.

A Master Maine Guide, Carl “will lose his job with the state Department of Corrections because he is now a convicted felon, was sentenced to 15 months in prison with all but 10 days suspended, will pay $1,325 in fines and fees, and will spend two years on probation, during which time he will be prohibited from using or possessing hunting dogs or hunting or trapping equipment. He also will be barred from hunting, trapping or guiding activities during this time,” reported Bangor Daily News staff writer Abigail Curtis. Carl was convicted seven months after fellow prison guard Corey Robinson, 30, of Montville, “was found guilty of aggravated cruelty to animals and a closed-season trapping violation by a different Waldo County jury,” Curtis continued. “Robinson received the same sentence but is appealing the verdict.” Both Carl and Robinson were convicted after the juries viewed video of the purported “training accident” taken by Vernon Travis Smith of Burnham, who “pleaded guilty to a closed-season trapping charge and paid a fine,” Curtis wrote.

The verdicts were noteworthy not only for convicting hunters of what they contended was not a deliberate outcome but also for coming in a state which has long had one of the highest rates of hunting participation in the U.S.

Becoming aware of a Showing Animals Respect & Kindness drone helicopter overhead, videotaping the proceedings, houndsmen participating in a “field trial” at the 300-acre Indiana Fox Hunters’ Association facility near Linton, Indiana on June 2, 2012 called off their dogs for hours. Cameras mounted on the drone helicopter clearly showed several coyotes seeking cover ahead of large packs of hounds. Further chases proceeded only at long intervals, SHARK founder Steve Hindi told ANIMAL PEOPLE. Pressured in 2010 by animal advocates to close the Linton facility, which had operated for about 20 years without permits, the Indiana Natural Resources Commission instead voted 9-2 to create a permit to keep the site open.

Merritt Clifton
Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE
P.O. Box 960 | Clinton, WA 98236
Telephone: 360-579-2505
Cell: 360-969-0450
Fax: 360-579-2575
E-mail: anmlpepl@whidbey.com
Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org

ANIMAL PEOPLE

Don’t Miss a Single Article!
Subscribe to our reports by signing up below.
It’s easy, safe and quick.
JUST CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW

Subscribe to Animal People (The HTML Edition) by Email

 

 

Let’s keep this award-winning site going!

Yes, audiences applaud us. But do you?

If yes, then buy us a beer. The wingnuts are falling over each other to make donations…to their causes. We, on the other hand, take our left media—the only media that speak for us— for granted. Don’t join that parade, and give today. Every dollar counts.

 
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




“Bait dogs” are docile victims to some pit bull advocates, “urban legend” to others


From ANIMAL PEOPLE, May 2012:

Setting closely matched dogs against each other as a gambling pursuit gained popularity in the fast-growing waterfront cities of the 19th century, where bulls and wildlife for traditional baiting were relatively inaccessible.

Since the promoters in the Laguna case owned the dogs on either side of each fight, the outcomes may have been rigged to reap maximum profit from gamblers in South Korea who had no ownership stake in the dogs.

Animal People, the world’s only independent publication dedicated to animal issues.

Merritt Clifton
Editor, ANIMAL PEOPLE
P.O. Box 960 | Clinton, WA 98236
Telephone: 360-579-2505
Cell: 360-969-0450
Fax: 360-579-2575
E-mail: anmlpepl@whidbey.com
Web: www.animalpeoplenews.org

ANIMAL PEOPLE

Don’t Miss a Single Article!
Subscribe to our reports by signing up below.
It’s easy, safe and quick.
JUST CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW

Subscribe to Animal People (The HTML Edition) by Email

ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG! (Hmm…that got your attention, uh?)

Did you like this article? Then buy us a beer. How many times do we have to beg you? The wingnuts and fascists are falling over each other to make donations…to their filthy causes. We, on the other hand, take our left blogs for granted.

Just think how much money you spend on beer, cigs, trinkets and other useless stuff that can also kill you.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




OpEds: OPEN SEASON IN TEXAS…

By Ruth Eisenbud

ChrisB321

scimitar-horned oryx resting peacefully, only to be struck down by a steward of dominion….

“God blessed Noah and his sons, and said to them: ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. The fear and dread of you shall rest on every animal of the earth, and on every bird of the air, on everything that creeps on the ground, and on all the fish in the sea; into your hand they are delivered. Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you; and just as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.'” genesis

On June 10 20/20 aired a segment of hunting ranches in Texas where, for a fee, men with self esteem issues can hunt down exotic animals at close range with high powered rifles:
 
http://www.allaboutexotics.com/2012/01/exotic-hunting-featured-on-60-minutes/
 
pro-dominion…
This violence to harmless animals is justified as conservation. The root of the word conservation is to conserve. It means to preserve, not hunt down and kill. The reason for the confusion can be traced to the biblical edict of dominion, which grants man the right to benefit from animal cruelty, as long as the proper labels are used. Hence managing herds of exotic animals, so that they may be hunted down is labeled conservation. It is considered good stewardship of ones resources… to breed them, so that they may be killed for their trophy value.  Before harming another, compassion considers the harm to the victim, not the benefits to the exploiter. There-in lies the corruption of the term conservation: the animals are conserved, so that they may be exploited and killed.  
 
Such a distortion of conservation is consistent with the double speak of dominion, where cruelty for the right price is mislabeled as righteous for it is good business. The right to kill for a price, as guaranteed by dominion aka stewardship  is reflected in this comment on the 60 Minutes webpage, from a staunch dominionite:
 
“With regard to ‘animal rights’ I am ‘pro-dominion’ that is to say I believe we as humans have been given dominion over all the creatures on earth and therefore are responsible for the stewardship of these creatures.

If the facts/numbers are correct as reported then it appears the private sector has been successful at conserving and multiplying the endangered species. The private solution/compromise has also providing a profitable, job-creating service to hunters. And those hunters have contributed to the conversation of the endangered species.
In my view this is good stewardship and apparently good business. Obviously, I am also a capitalist.”

ChrisB321

 
Such an unambiguous defense of dominion, is a a clear indication of the profound harm it causes. This view fails to recognize a universal truth of compassion: the life of an animal has inherent worth which cannot be measured by its value to man.
 
love and sacrifice…
Still using the language of dominion, the ranch owner, Charly Seale, claimed it was necessary to sacrifice some animals, so that others may live. Sacrifice is nothing more than an antiquated excuse to kill. It orginated as a means of sanctifying slaughter, so that meat could be consumed. Animal sacrifice (aka slaughter), no matter what the justification, is always cruel and unusual punishment of beautiful animals that grace us with their presence when they are alive, not as body parts hanging on a on a wall. If there were no profit in this cruel charade, all efforts of this mockery of conservation would cease. The animals are not conserved for their own interest, but for interests of insecure men who do not understand the sanctity of life. The need to prove one’s prowess by bagging a defenseless animal and displaying the carnage has nothing to do with conservation.
 
Continuing with the double-speak of dominion, the owner of the ranch noted his love for the animals he auctions off to be killed… This fundamental contradiction perverts the very meaning of love.  Love is not consistent with killing. There is no love in violent the taking of a life. Such violence, considered love, is a mark against the religious doctrine that encourages it. It fails to take into account the view that animals exist for their own interest, not as a supply of body parts over impressed by their own righteous importance.
 
conservation
Another religious tradition, indigenous to India, is based on ahimsa – the idea that ALL life is sacred, worthy of respect and conservation is expressed as follows:
 
“For there is nothing inaccessible for death.
All beings are fond of life, hate pain, like pleasure,
shun destruction, like life, long to live. To all life
is dear.” Jain Acharanga Sutra.
 
“All things breathing, all things existing, all living beings whatever, would not be slain or treated with violence, or insulted, or tortured or driven away. This is the pure unchanging eternal law, which the wise ones who know the world have proclaimed…” Jain Acharanga Sutra

 

In India, where ahimsa imbues the view on animals, there are no canned hunts or culls . Animals are not made to pay the price for human incursions in to their traditional habitats.  Instead evey effort at true conservation is made. Animals who stray into human habitats, even if they create havoc and accidentally harm humans, are not killed. They are instead returned to sanctuaries or a safer habitat, where they will not be a threat or be threatened by humans. These animals are not kept in sanctuaries to be shot down with high powered rifles as a demonstration of man’s dominion over the animals. The root of the term sanctuary is the same as for sanctity: that which is holy and sacred. When life is sacred animals are not bred to be killed, but to allow them to thrive.

The distortions and confusion of dominion are not accepted in india, where a kinder message towards animals is understood. There is a bear sanctuary in Agra, India, where bears are brought to recover from the trauma of human exploitation. They are allowed to live out their lives free from human harm:

http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=166684720010055:

 

Rescued bears at the Wildlife SOS Rehabilitation Centre.

It’s designed to provide a near-natural environment for the rescued bears.


 The Rescue shelter is situated inside the ‘Sur Sarovar Bird Sanctuary’, Keetham, near Agra city.

culling the herd…

This comment from dominion advocate ChrisB321 fails to recognize that capitalizing from exploitation of animals is a non-essential component  of capitalism:  “In my view this is good stewardship and apparently good business. Obviously, I am also a capitalist.” ChrisB321
 
This suggestion reflects the fallacy that cruelty is appropriate if one is a capitalist. This distortion too is made possible by the unbalanced view of dominion. The wealthiest man in India, mukesh ambani, does not earn his billions by killing animals. As a lifelong vegetarian, he understands that benefitting from the suffering of animals is not good capitalism, but an expression of self-serving violence and force.  He does not need animal body parts in his home to prove that he is a person of stature (see appendix A)
 
an indictment…
What kind of a person would interpret killing to mean love; the sanctity of life to mean we may take animals lives for our pleasure; conservation to mean breeding animals so that we may kill them. A person indoctrinated by the myth of human supremacy would find it gratifying to murder animals for profit or as expensive trophies of manhood. Such indoctrination fails to appreciate the value of mutual cooperation with animals with whom share our world.
 
 

The consequences of dominion extend to humans as indicated by another comment to the Sixty Minutes segment:
 
“Priscilla needs to be “CULLED” out of the herd. She wants to save these 3 species from extinction but would rather see them extinct than hunted in Texas. She needs to be downright slapped for her “Idiocy” and “Lunacy!” She is an uneducated (on the problem at hand) person and needs to know the facts before she opens that mouth of hers.”  Justin Smoot
 
In this case Smoot is referring to Priscilla Feral, of Friends of Animals, an advocate for animal compassion, opposed to the canned hunts sponsored by undeducated individuals impressed with their supremacy over animals. Priscilla has brought a law suit to end the hunting of three species, on Texas farms, where conservation is used as a front for cruelty and greed.
 
Using the vocabulary of dominion, if you dont agree with an opinion – ‘just cull that person out of the herd’. That person is no longer granted the human right to compassion, but is treated with the disdain for animals, so cherished by dominion.
Playing god with animal lives, with the righteous pretense of conservation is a perversion of the golden rule.
 
When did love become brutality?
How did destruction become conservation?
 
When words are incorrectly redefined to promote exploitation, they reflect the cruel intention of dominion. In this case there is neither conservation nor love.
 
Until dominion is relegated to the pile of antiquated views that have no place in a civilized society, there will be men who insist that on their right to kill for profit or an illusion of power, then call it conservation. Until that time it will always be open season for hunting down the weak and defenseless among us.
 

ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG! (Hmm…that got your attention, uh?)

Did you like this article? Then buy us a beer. How many times do we have to beg you? The wingnuts and fascists are falling over each other to make donations…to their filthy causes. We, on the other hand, take our left blogs for granted.

Just think how much money you spend on beer, cigs, trinkets and other useless stuff that can also kill you.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

 

 

 

 

 

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




Trapper shoots horse as bait to trap last breeding wolf from Toklat pack

 SPECIAL TO TGP—

Denali Toklat pack wolf: rarely seen, future uncertain.

Editor’s Note: Once again humans demonstrate their capacity for depravity and cruelty, and public officials their disgusting venality in regard to the privileged  “interests” of hunters, a class of people practically worshiped in nature-exploiting states like Alaska, put above the rights of other citizens who are entitled to enjoy nature with a camera and not a gun (or arrows or worse) and where any animal unfortunate enough to compete for “game” with gun-toting bloodthirsty idiots and their state official supporters is a target for organized massacre. When will humanity emerge from this nonsense? A nonsense abetted by the powerful and vociferous gun lobby every inch of the way? A lobby which despite the noise remains an absolute but well organized minority? When will national politicians rustle up the courage to stand up for what is obviously right, to halt a totally unjustified war on nature? If the actions of Coke Wallace shock you, remind yourself that hunting guides, as people who make a living serving hunters, are well-known for their indifference to ethics when it comes to animals. Their kind has been idiotically idealized in many movies, where the image of the great white hunter and his loyal guide is still admired. Meanwhile, expect the carnage of wildlife to continue unabated in Alaska and similar —P. Greanville

 

From ANIMAL PEOPLE,  June 2012
A dispatch by Merritt Clifton

    DENALI NATIONAL PARK,  Alaska–Hunting guide Coke Wallace, of Healy,  has acknowledged walking an aged horse to the Stampede Trail near the northern boundary of Denali National Park,  shooting the horse,  and setting snares around the carcass.  The snares killed the last known breeding female wolf from the Grant Creek pack–the pack that roams the area made famous by the 1996 book by Jon Krakauer and 2007 feature film Into the Wild,  about the 1992 death nearby of 22-year-old would-be survivalist Christopher McCandless.
    The Grant Creek pack,  also called the Toklat West pack,  is among the three wolf packs most often viewed and photographed by Denali visitors.  The pack has been continuously studied since 1939, first by Adolf Murie until his death in 1974,  then by Gordon Haber from 1966 until his death while spotting wolves from a light plane in 2009,  and currently by Anchorage conservation biologist and former University of Alaska professor Rick Steiner.
    “One of the dead wolves was equipped with a radio collar attached by scientists.  She was the only female from the pack known to have raised pups last year,”  reported Kim Murphy of the Los Angeles Times.  “The pack’s only other known breeding female was found dead near the pack’s den,  probably of natural causes.  A third wolf,  also snared near the horse carcass,  was a male who may or may not have been part of the Grant Creek pack,”  according to Denali National Park biologist Tom Meier.
    Wallace contended that the female wolf he snared was emaciated.  “Coke’s wolf was in a trap for a week and was scavenged by a wolverine before he ever even saw it,”  Meier responded to Murphy.  “These wolves aren’t starving.”  Meier pointed out that wolves are normally lean in spring,  after enduring the harsh Alaskan winters.
    The Denali National Park wolf population has declined since 2006 from 103 wolves in 15 packs to 70 wolves in nine packs,  a 20-year low,  Meier said.
    “The snares were within the former protected Denali buffer, where trapping and hunting of wolves was prohibited from 2002 to 2010,”  e-mailed Steiner.  “Ignoring several proposals to expand the no-take Denali wolf buffer zone–including a proposal from Denali National Park itself–the Alaska Board of Game instead eliminated the protective buffer and imposed a moratorium on future consideration of any Denali wolf protection buffer proposals until 2016.”
    The Alaska State Troopers and Alaska Department of Fish & Game said Wallace had not broken any laws,  but downstream residents David and Susan Braun told the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation that the rotting horse carcass had contaminated their drinking water.
    Friends of Animals and Defenders of Wildlife amplified appeals for the Denali buffer zone to be restored.
    Amid the controversy,  acting Alaska Division of Wildlife Conservation director Doug Vincent Lang on May 1,  2012 told Dan Joling of Associated Press that the agency would do a year of further study before implementing a recommendation by the Alaska Board of Game that wolves,  black bears,  and grizzly bears should be culled on the Kenai Peninsula to boost the numbers of moose available to human hunters.

MERRITT CLIFTON is editor in chief of Animal People, the only independent publication devoted to ecoanimal issues in the world.

ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG! (Hmm…that got your attention, uh?)

Did you like this article? Then buy us a beer. How many times do we have to beg you? The wingnuts and fascists are falling over each other to make donations…to their filthy causes. We, on the other hand, take our left blogs for granted.

Just think how much money you spend on beer, cigs, trinkets and other useless stuff that can also kill you.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

 

 

 

 

 

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

 




Pennsylvania politics continues to override humane actions

by Walter Brasch
A national animal welfare organization has filed an ethics complaint against a Pennsylvania district attorney. 

Not even Texas, notorious for its callousness toward animals, stoops as low as Pennsylvania.

SHARK (Showing Animals Respect and Kindness) charges Bucks County DA David Heckler with conflict-of-interest, favoritism, and failure to fulfill his professional responsibilities. The ethics complaint was filed with the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

SHARK, an Illinois-based charity, has been more active in Pennsylvania following a $1 million donation by Bob Barker to stop pigeon shoots. Pennsylvania is the only state that has open and regularly occurring pigeon shoots.

The conflict-of-interest part of the complaint dates from 2010 when Heckler refused to allow Johnna Seeton, a humane officer, to have an attorney and then blocked her from filing summary citations of animal cruelty against the Philadelphia Gun Club of Bensalem, Pa. “I showed him the evidence, and that’s the last I heard from him,” says Seeton. But it wasn’t the last of the case. “The next thing I know is that I read in the paper that Mr. Heckler had brokered a deal with the gun club,” she says. That deal was for the club to pay court costs and make a $200 donation to the Bucks County SPCA. Seeton was never consulted. Heckler, however, prior to working out a deal had gone to the media to denounce Seeton’s citations as nothing more than “hot air.”

The deal was worked out with Sean Corr, attorney for the PGC. Corr, says Steve Hindi of SHARK, “was one of the biggest individual donors to the Bucks County Republican Committee [which had] heavily funded Heckler’s election campaign.” Heckler had been a state representative and senator and then a judge of the Bucks County Common Pleas Court. Corr, who was shooting pigeons at the PGC in December 2009, was convicted of harassment for shoving a camera into Hindi’s face; Hindi was not on PGC property at the time of the incident, according to the Doylestown Intelligencer. Corr is currently a part-time solicitor for the county.

On April 30 of this year, Seeton filed five summary citations of animal cruelty against the PGC for violations during pigeon shoots on March 17 and 31. State law gives DAs the discretion to deny the presence of attorneys for plaintiffs. However, Heckler’s actions are the only time any DA denied Seeton, a humane officer since 1998, the right to have an attorney. Seeton says that a private attorney representing the Pennsylvania Legislature Animal Network (PLAN) would incur no public costs. As was the case in 2010, Heckler refused to tell Seeton the reason for his denial of legal representation.

“There is a reasonableness standard that a DA in denying attorney representation will have a bona fide reason to do so,” says Elissa Katz, an attorney and president of Humane PA PAC, “but in this case there appears to be no reasonable basis for denying representation.” The PGC, however, could be represented by an attorney in the court of District Magistrate Leonard Brown. Heckler’s action “places the parties on an unfair playing field from the beginning,” says Katz.

Heckler numerous times stated that although he isn’t a pigeon shooter, he is reluctant to pursue charges against pigeon shooting because it isn’t a crime in Pennsylvania. Tom Logan, a Bucks County assistant district attorney, says the reason the DA’s office is denying Seeton legal representation is because “a review of the law [indicates] it is not a crime. If it’s not a crime, we don’t want to turn it into a crime.”

However, in Bensalem Twp., where the PGC is located, pigeon shooting is illegal. In May 2002, the township determined that “live pigeon shoots do, in fact, violate the Pennsylvania Animal Cruelty Statue . . . as well as Township Ordinance No. 71,” and issued a cease and desist order. The PGC briefly suspended the shoots. Karel Minor, executive director of the Humane Society of Berks County, says pigeon shoots, contrary to public perception and political gesturing, are already illegal. The shoots, says Minor, aren’t protected “under any statute, law or code.” Further, he says, “Because they aren’t exempt from animal cruelty law, they are subject to them by definition.”

However, the problem is enforcement. “As long as DAs aren’t allowing humane society police officers to enforce existing law, the legislature is going to have to stop avoiding the issue and clarify that this practice is illegal,” says Heidi Prescott, senior vice-president for the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). Leaders of the state legislature, cowered by a heavy NRA lobbying campaign that irrationally equates an end of the cruelty of pigeon shooting with a violation of Second Amendment rights, have numerous times blocked legislation from a full vote. The only time the bill was voted on as a free-standing bill was in the 1980s. Several attempts to amend it have been made over the past 20 years, the closest vote taking place in 1994, when the House voted 99–93 in favor of an amendment to ban pigeon shoots, but fell short of the 102 votes needed for passage.

Most of the 20–25 pigeon shoots are in suburban Philadelphia, specifically Bucks and Berks counties, with a combined population of more than one million. Individual shoots are also held in Dauphin and Northumberland counties. The Hegins pigeon shoot in Schuylkill County was finally cancelled in 2000 after the state Supreme Court ruled that animal cruelty charges could be filed against the organizers. That shoot, begun in 1935, had attracted national attention during its last 12 years when animal rights protestors tried to rescue wounded birds and used several tactics as they confronted shooters and their supporters, including large numbers of skinheads and fringe groups from the extreme right.

Pigeon shoot organizers put as many as 5,000 birds, often scared and undernourished, into small cages and then release them about 30 yards in front of pretend-hunters with 12-gauge shotguns. Most of the birds are hit by the shot within five to 10 feet of the cages, with many shot while standing on the ground. About three-fourths of all birds are wounded, not killed outright, says Prescott. If shot within the gun club’s property, trapper boys, often in their teens will take the birds, wring their necks, snip their heads off, or stuff them alive into barrels to suffocate. If the birds survive long enough to fly outside the gun club’s property, most will die lingering and painful deaths; at the PGC, many will fall into the Delaware River and slowly drown as they struggle to swim to shore, says Prescott.

The Pennsylvania Game Commission doesn’t call pigeon shoots a sport nor does the International Olympic Committee, which banned it after the 1900 Olympics. Most hunters and sportsmen oppose pigeon shoots because they aren’t considered to be fair chase hunting.

SHARK also claims Heckler repeatedly refused to file charges against the PGC for actions that specifically violate Pennsylvania law. It claims Heckler refused to file charges against PGC members for deliberately firing shotgun shells at protesters in boats on the Delaware River. The PGC had initially filed requests with the Coast Guard to establish temporary exclusion zones on the river during pigeon shoots, but withdrew the requests. SHARK believes the reason is because the PGC didn’t wish to file an environmental impact statement that would reveal more than a century of shotgun shells and dead pigeons polluting the river.

The SHARK petition also claims that in two separate incidents PGC members recklessly drove their vehicles at female protestors. Both actions were captured on videotape. In one case, the local police and the DA’s office refused to press charges. In the second incident, a PGC member who is an attorney yelled sexist obscenities at a Marianne Bessey, an animal rights activist, “as he recklessly drove his SUV past her.” Later, in media interviews, the PGC member acknowledged his actions. However, when Bessey, an attorney, tried to file a private complaint for disorderly conduct and harassment, Heckler denied it. Bessey says Heckler claimed there was “insufficient evidence” and that her complaint lacked “prosecutorial merit.”

Heckler also refused to file charges against an individual who, SHARK claims, assaulted Hindi and brandished a pistol, threatening him for protesting. According to the petition, Robert Olsen, operations manager of Carlton Pools, owned by Joseph Solana who holds live pigeon shoots on his property, twice drove his SUV directly at a vehicle driven by Hindi on the company’s parking lot. The third time, according to the petition, on a public street, Olsen “grabbed at and assaulted” SHARK investigator Janet Enoch. When Hindi tried to intervene, Olsen pointed a loaded pistol at Hindi, swore at him, and ordered him to “get down on the ground,” according to the complaint. Although the assault was videotaped, Heckler filed only two charges—reckless driving and fighting. In contrast, according to SHARK, Heckler prosecuted a resident who “pulled a handgun on a snow plow operator who had just buried his car in the snow.” That charge led to a three month jail term.

Pigeon shoots, like cockfighting and dog fighting, “are contests scored by hurting and killing live animals while gambling on the outcome, representing the worst of humanity,” says Prescott.

Although Pennsylvania legislators, police, and DAs may publically say how much they detest animal cruelty, they have shown their cowardice to do what is right by their failure to prosecute cruelty charges against pigeon shoots.

Walter Brasch, an award-winning syndicated columnist, has shot at many clay pigeons but never at a live pigeon. He attended his first pigeon shoot as a reporter more than 20 years ago, and has been writing about the cruelty of pigeons shoots since then. He is the author of 17 books; his latest is the critically-acclaimed novel Before the First Snow.

ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG! (Hmm…that got your attention, uh?)

Did you like this article? Then buy us a beer. How many times do we have to beg you? The wingnuts and fascists are falling over each other to make donations…to their filthy causes. We, on the other hand, take our left blogs for granted.

Just think how much money you spend on beer, cigs, trinkets and other useless stuff that can also kill you.
Use the DONATE button below or on the sidebar. And do the right thing. Even once a year.

 

 

 

 

 

Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.