Why You Can Be Branded a Terrorist for Fighting Animal Abuse

By Rania Khalek, AlterNet


Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) violates their First Amendment right to free speech and has had a chilling effect on activists who are refraining from participating in what should be constitutionally protected activity out of fear of being labeled a terrorist.

They have good reason to worry. In 2009, the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force arrested and indicted four California protesters for terrorism, each of whom faced 10 years in prison. Their crimes? They “marched, chanted, and chalked” sidewalk slogans outside the homes of animal researchers and distributed fliers about their campaign.

In 2010, federal judge Ronald M. Whyte dismissed the indictments, agreeing with the defense that the charges were too vague because the “behavior in question spans a wide spectrum from criminal conduct to constitutionally protected political protest.” Nevertheless, AETA continues to pose a threat to those participating in animal rights advocacy.

AETA, a 2006 upgrade to the weaker Animal Enterprise Protection Act (AEPA) of 1992, was a bipartisan effort cosponsored by Senators James Inhofe. R-Okla., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to, in the words of Inhofe, “combat radical animal rights extremists who commit violent acts against innocent people because they work with animals.”


Coalition to Abolish the AETA, corporate front-groups like the Animal Enterprise Protection Coalition (AEPC), the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and the Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) lobbied heavily for the act’s passage. It’s no accident that the chilling effect of AETA on the free speech of animal rights activists helps biomedical and agribusiness companies avoid exposure.

The federal lawsuit against AETA, filed last month by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) on behalf of the five activists, seeks an injunction against AETA on the grounds that it violates the First Amendment and discriminates against a particular ideology by singling out animal rights activists. (Restrictions on free speech rights must be “content neutral.”)

According to the complaint, AETA has led “many advocates to censor themselves and refrain from protected speech” such as “attending public protests, or investigating and publicizing conditions and mistreatment of animals on factory farms – all of which are protected activity under the First Amendment – in order to educate fellow citizens about the harms and abuses associated with large-scale factory farming.”

Lead plaintiff Sarahjane Blum is a 23-year veteran of animal rights activism and cofounder of Gourmet Cruelty, an organization that helped expose the appalling conditions of ducks and geese in the foie gras industry, which force-feeds birds until they are too heavy to walk or even stand. Thanks to Blum’s work documenting foie gras farms, California passed a law in 2004 that banned foie gras in the state (it goes into effect this year). Had her efforts taken place after the passage of AETA, she might have faced terrorism charges for costing the foie gras industry profits. In the past, Blum “had knowingly and openly violated the law many times through acts of non-violent civil disobedience,” but has since been “unwilling to face the possibility of prosecution and sentencing as a terrorist,” according to the lawsuit.

“I spent years uncovering conditions on foie gras farms and educating the public about the way ducks and geese are abused,” Blum told CCR. “I no longer feel free to speak my mind on these issues out of fear that my advocacy could actually convince people to stop eating foie gras – affecting those businesses’ bottom line and turning me into an animal enterprise terrorist.”

Blum isn’t alone. Ryan Shapiro, another plaintiff who co-founded Gourmet Cruelty with Blum, wishes to use his film degree to further document and reveal abhorrent factory farm practices. Yet Shapiro has refrained from doing so because he feels paralyzed by the prospect that it could land him behind bars as a terrorist under AETA.

Another plaintiff, Lauren Gazzola, was convicted in 2006 under AETA’s less punitive 1992 predecessor. Gazzola was found guilty on six felony counts and spent nearly four years in federal prison for her involvement in the animal rights movement, as detailed by CCR:

Lauren’s arrest and prosecution arose from her leadership role in Stop Huntington Animal Cruelty (SHAC), a grassroots campaign devoted to exposing and ending horrific animal abuse at Huntington Life Sciences, a corporation made infamous after undercover investigators disclosed footage of researchers dissecting a conscious monkey, repeatedly punching beagle puppies in the face, and other abuse.  Lauren and the other SHAC defendants were not prosecuted for personally damaging Huntington property but, rather, for running a website that reported on and endorsed legal and illegal protests that caused the company to lose money. 

Like her fellow plaintiffs, Gazzola wants to reenter the world of animal rights advocacy, but due to the vague AETA language she is uncertain what constitutes free speech.

Beyond Animal Rights: Why Everyone Should Care About AETA

Independent journalist Will Potter suggests that the consequences of this case could reach far beyond the realm of animal rights, leaving no social justice movement untouched. On his Web site Green Is the New Red, he writes, “It sets a dangerous precedent for labeling anyone who effectively threatens corporate profits a ‘terrorist.’” Potter has spent years reporting extensively on what he calls “a coordinated campaign to target animal rights activists who…cause ‘economic loss’ to corporations.” In a recent blog post, he lists a handful of the latest examples: 

CCR recognizes these dangers as well, acknowledging in a press release that “AETA is written so expansively it could turn a successful labor protest at Wal-Mart into an act of domestic terrorism. Nonviolent violators face up to 20 years in prison, depending on the amount of profit loss that results.”

When Upton Sinclair published his scathing condemnation of the unsanitary and atrocious labor practices of the meatpacking industry in 1906, the purchase of American meat both nationally and internationally took a 50 percent nosedive. Meanwhile, in less than a year, the public outcry garnered by Sinclair’s invaluable investigative work led to the passage of the Meat Inspection Act and Pure Food and Drug Act of, which provided the base structure of the Food and Drug Administration. However, if SInclair had published The Jungle today, he might just be facing prosecution for terrorism.

Rania Khalek is an associate writer for AlterNet. Follow her on Twitter @RaniaKhalek.

ADVERT PRO NOBIS
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

IF YOU CAN’T SEND A DONATION, NO MATTER HOW SMALL, AND YOU THINK THIS PUBLICATION IS WORTH SUPPORTING, AT LEAST HELP THE GREANVILLE POST EXPAND ITS INFLUENCE BY MENTIONING IT TO YOUR FRIENDS VIA TWEET OR OTHER SOCIAL NETWORKS!
We are in a battle of communications with entrenched enemies that won’t stop until this world is destroyed and our remaining democratic rights stamped out. Only mass education and mobilization can stop this process.

It’s really up to you.
Do your part while you can.
•••

Donating? Use PayPal via the button below.

THANK YOU.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________




Good News Dept.: Drones Vs. Japanese Whalers

by JONATHAN FRANKLIN

Santiago, Chile.

Environmental activists in the rough Antarctic seas have launched a new tool in the fight to stop a Japanese operation to kill hundreds of whales – remote-controlled drones.

Every morning for the past week, a battery-powered drone with a range of 300km (190 miles) has been launched from the MV Steve Irwin, which is attempting to disrupt the annual Japanese whale hunts in the waters off Antarctica.

“We first found the Japanese fleet when they were 28 nautical miles away,” said Paul Watson, founder of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, an international marine wildlife protection group based in the United States.

Subsequent attempts by Japanese whaling ships to block the anti-whaling flotilla and allow the whale factory ship Nisshin Maru to escape were foiled by the activists, who repeatedly launched the drone, which uses GPS co-ordinates and provides both video and still images to track the whaling ships.

“Our helicopter pilot, Chris Aultman, has been lobbying for this technology for the past two years and now that we have this ‘eye in the sky’ it makes it much harder for the whaling fleet to escape,” said Watson in a telephone interview from the Steve Irwin. “The other day they switched back from east to west and we detected this with the drone.”

Watson has 88 crew on three ships, two of which are equipped with drones. They act as spotters, finding the whalers in the vast expanse of ocean and allowing Watson’s ships to home in on them.

Watson has embarked on his annual expedition to stop the slaughter of thousands of whales – the Japanese consider this to be scientific research while critics call it cruel and archaic. “Last year they had a quota of over 1,000 whales and only caught 16%. We saved at least 800 whales,” said Watson, who has been known to ram the Japanese boats as part of his anything-goes tactics. [Atta, boys!—Eds.]

RIGHT: Watson’s boat blocks a Japanese whaler.

The advent of new technologies such as drones may finally put an end to the Japanese hunt, said Watson, who is also bringing publicity to the cause in Whale Wars, the Discovery channel documentary series that tracks the hunts: “Our goal is to bankrupt them and destroy them economically. Now that we can track them, it is getting easier.”

Once exclusive to Israeli spy forces and the US air force, drones and other types of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are being sent on civilian missions such as crop inspections or marine mammal surveys. In April, drones hovered inside highly radioactive areas at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and recorded data from areas too dangerous for humans to enter.

Federal bodies in the US, including the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), are scrambling to monitor the burgeoning industry. According to the Los Angeles Times, the FAA will issue proposals this month to clarify rules for the use of UAVs in civilian and commercial roles.

While drones used to cost hundreds of thousands of pounds, some are now available for less than £500. The unit used by Sea Shepherd is a highly durable model known as the Osprey, which can run for hundreds of hours .

It was given to Sea Shepherd by Bayshore Recycling, a New Jersey-based solid waste recycling company committed to environmental protection. In addition to paying for the drone at an estimated cost of £10,000, Bayshore also paid for pilot training to run the remote control equipment.

“Everyone here at Bayshore is thrilled with the Sea Shepherd’s news of not only saving the lives of many whales, but knowing our drone will continue to track the Japanese whaling fleet in this chase,” said Elena Bagarozza, marketing co-ordinator at Bayshore.

Watson expects drones will be used to patrol environmentally sensitive areas ranging from the Galapagos Islands to other famed wildlife areas, including South Africa’s Kruger National Park.

“There is huge potential and great value in this technology – for our expedition it is wonderful,” said Eleanor Lister, 20, a Sea Shepherd crew member from Jersey, who spoke by satellite phone from aboard the Steve Irwin from a location that, she said, “was about 1,000 miles south-west of Australia”.

She described the daily routine that begins when the ship’s first mate holds aloft the Osprey drone, then tosses it into the headwinds. After tracking the Japanese whalers, the drone ends its mission as it homes in on the Steve Irwin and is flown into a thick net, where crew members inspect it for damage and download the video and photographs from the latest mission.

Despite severe weather in the Antarctic, the drone has flown dozens of flights and had no problems so far with ice buildup on the wings or trouble negotiating the gusty winds.

“The Osprey is comfortable in the wind and can handle 40 knots,” said Jimmy Prouty, systems engineer at Hangar 18, the Kansas-based company that manufactures it. “This unit is waterproofed and has multiple security backups so that if it has problems or low battery it automatically returns to base.”

JONATHAN FRANKLIN writes for the Guardian and other publications.

 ADVERT PRO NOBIS
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

IF YOU THINK THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA ARE A DISGRACE AND A HUGE OBSTACLE
to real change in America why haven’t you sent at least a few dollars to The Greanville Post (or a similar anti-corporate citizen’s media?). Think about it.  Without educating and organizing our ranks our cause is DOA. That’s why our new citizens’ media need your support. Send your badly needed check to “TGP, P.O. Box 1028, Brewster, NY 10509-1028.” Make checks out to “P. Greanville/ TGP”.  (A contribution of any amount can also be made via Paypal and MC or VISA.)

THANK YOU.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 




Standing Up to Obama on the Environment

 Ten Small Green Groups That Make a Big Difference



Obama: a disgrace as a president.  “The worst enemy is he who pretends to be your friend and betrays you.” 

by JEFFREY ST. CLAIR, Co-editor, Counterpunch

It’s been a triumphant month for Big Oil. First, the Obama administration teamed with the Chinese delegation to scuttle the timid climate agenda at the Durban summit. Then recidivist offender British Petroleum won the rights to drill once again in the perilous depths of the Gulf of Mexico. And last week the Interior Department gave the green light for Shell to begin exploratory drilling in the pristine Chukchi Sea on Alaska’s western coast.

These environmental body-blows elicited barely a murmur of protest from the green establishment and as the presidential election draws near even those faint critiques will fade away and inevitably be replaced by an REI-clad chorus singing Obama’s praises as an ecologically enlightened chief executive. The crazed encomiums have already begun. Carl Pope, recently deposed from his twenty-year-long autocracy over the Sierra Club, ludicrously pronounced Obama the greatest environmental president in history.

Yet, when it comes to protection of the environment Obama’s no Richard Nixon. Indeed, he’s barely even George W. Bush. Let’s look at revealing numbers from the national forests. During Bush’s first three years in office, the Forest Service sold 4,792,702 MBF (thousand board feet) of timber logged from the national forests. During Obama’s first three years in office, his team of chainsaw zealots nearly doubled Bush’s frightful totals, selling 7,641,484 MBF. (See Sold-Harvest Documents, 1905-2011, National Summary Graph, US Forest Service.) Even worse, Obama’s Forest Service cloaks this grim enterprise under the dubious premise of “ecological forestry” and “biomass production.” Recall that this high level of logging is occurring during an economic recession and prolonged slump in the housing market. If the economy ever picks up, Obama may even break the logging records set by Clinton after the Rider From Hell.

As for coal mining, according to the annual coal report prepared by the US Energy Information Administration, total coal production has actually increased since Bush left office, bulging from 1,070.9 million short tons in 2008 to 1,084.4 million short tons in 2010. Coal consumption has climbed even faster, rising more than five percent under Obama’s tenure. So much for energy conservation. But don’t tell that to Bill McKibben. While leading the protests in front of the White House against the Keystone XL Pipeline, the Cassandra of Climate Change was proudly sporting an Obama button.

Despite the ongoing crisis at Fukushima, Obama has recklessly boosted the fortunes of the nuclear power industry in the United States. Just this week, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the design plans for three new nuclear power plants slated for construction in Georgia and South Carolina, the first new plants in the nation in the last thirty years. This shouldn’t have surprised anyone familiar with Obama’s political career, which has long been sponsored by the Exelon Corporation, which operates 17 nuclear reactors, most of them in Illinois.

Wildlife isn’t faring any better. In the Pacific Northwest, the Obama administration wasted little time before endorsing a plan for endangered salmon stocks that was crafted by the Bush administration following instructions from the aluminum companies and the industrial agriculture lobby. A federal judge shot down the scheme and ordered the Obama administration to evaluate tearing down several fish-killing dams on the Snake River. Obama officials chafed at the ruling and pleaded with Congress to over-ride the judge’s decision.

In Yellowstone, Obama has opened a three-pronged attack against the region’s most iconic species: wolves, grizzlies and bison. Obama has moved to delist both the gray wolf and the Yellowstone grizzly from the protections afforded each under the Endangered Species Act. Thanks to Obama, the State of Idaho wants to allow hunters to kill 550 wolves, out of a total population of 700 wolves. The state of Montana, run by Obama’s pal Brian Schweitzer, is looking to kill more than 100 wolves from a population of only 425 animals. Again only a federal judge stands in the way of a region-wide massacre. Obama has also continued the depraved slaughter of Yellowstone’s bison herd under the bogus pretext of protecting local cattle from brucellosis. Since Obama took office more than 1,300 bison have been killed after wandering across the park’s invisible boundary.

One of the most noxious agencies in the entire federal government is an outpost of Agriculture Department known as the division of Wildlife Services, which functions as little more than a death squad for ranchers and developers. During the Bush Administration, the hunter-killer teams at Wildlife Services annually shot, trapped or poisoned hundreds of thousands of birds, mammals and reptiles. Many wildlife advocates hoped that the Obama Administration would defund the agency’s bloody work, which has no ecological or scientific merit. Instead, funding for Wildlife Services has actually increased marginally under Obama and the death toll continues to mount. The agency’s most recent report reveals the scope of the slaughter: 586 black bears, 27,218 beavers, 568,000 redwing blackbirds, 1,400 bobcats, 1,500 green iguanas, 367 mountain lions, 200 barn owls, 452 gray wolves, 20,500 black prairie dogs, 527 badgers, and 572 river otters. Of those river otters, 455 were killed “unintentionally.”  Just more collateral damage in Obama’s  indiscriminate war on wildlife.

It takes guts for an environmental group to stand up to a Democratic president in an election year and call him on his betrayals. You risk being marginalized and stripped of your funding by the Democratic-aligned foundations that underwrite most of the mainstream groups. Here are ten groups who stand up for what they stand on, who put protection of the environment before politics. They all operate close to the bone, their meager budgets are spent on activism and litigation, not on self-promoting direct mail operations, glitzy offices or bloated administrative expenses. These groups will put your money to work defending the planet. Now pony up!

Beyond Nuclear
6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 400
Takoma Park, MD 20912
Tel: 301.270.2209
http://www.beyondnuclear.org/

The nation’s feistiest and most uncompromising anti-nuclear power group, which is fighting to shutdown aging nuclear plants like Indian Point and protesting the construction of a new generation of nuclear plants. Beyond Nuclear also highlights the symbiotic relationship between nuclear power and nuclear weapons production.

Buffalo Field Campaign
PO Box 957
West Yellowstone, MT 59758
1-406-646-0070
http://www.buffalofieldcampaign.org/

Since 1985, the federal government, working in concert with Montana cattle barons, has killed more than 6,800 bison that have migrated out of Yellowstone National Park. The slaughter is rationalized on the specious grounds of preventing the spread of brucellosis from bison to local cows. The Buffalo Field Campaign has exposed this dreadful bloodbath as a political hoax. Their volunteers courageously place themselves between the bison and their would-be killers.  They spend all day, from sunrise until sunset, watching and documenting actions taken against the buffalo. They run patrols from cars, skis and snowshoes to protect buffalo outside the park. Their tactics range from video documentation to nonviolent civil disobedience.

Climate Ground Zero
PO Box 163, Rock Creek, 
West Virginia, 75174
http://climategroundzero.org/ 

The frontline battles against big coal aren’t being fought in Durban or Washington, but in the mining towns of Kentucky, Tennessee and West Virginia, where citizens are placing their bodies on the line to stop mountain top removal mining. This grotesque form of mining has devoured more than a million acres of forest, buried hundreds of miles of streams under toxic debris and is steadily annihilating a way of life for the mountain people of Appalachia. The coal industry has struck back hard, hitting activists with SLAPP suits, trying to intimidate greens from engaging in acts of nonviolent civil disobedience. Mike Roselle started this group and he hasn’t compromised since he bunted once in Little League.

Fund for Wild Nature
P.O. Box 900
Kelso, WA 98626
(360) 636-6030
http://www.fundwildnature.org/

Think of the Fund for Wild Nature as a kind of mutual fund for radical environmentalism. Instead of investing in stocks and bonds, the Fund for Wild Nature puts its money into non-compromising grassroots environmental groups. Unlike most foundations, the Fund for Wild Nature’s budget doesn’t derive from oil companies, sweatshops or software magnates, but from individuals who want to see militant action taken in defense of the earth. Join them. You’ll feel better about yourself.

Heartwood

P.O. Box 538

Gosport, IN 47433
http://www.heartwood.org/

The midwest was once blanketed with a majestic hardwood forest containing more than 70 species of hardwood trees. Unfortunately, much of this forest has been cleared and what remains is mostly isolated fragments of public land that nonetheless play a critical role in providing habitat for wildlife, purifying the air and water, moderating global climate change, and offering places of beauty and enjoyment. Heartwood was founded in 1991, when concerned citizens from several midwestern states met and agreed to work together to protect the heartland hardwood forest. Their campaigns remain rooted in the heart of the central hardwood region, with an emphasis on our “core states” of Indiana, Ohio, Illinois, Kentucky, and Missouri. Over time, Heartwood has branched out to serve areas of need throughout an 18-state region, giving special attention to the “at risk” national forests in Michigan, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Arkansas, West Virginia, and Virginia.

Living Rivers    
PO Box 466     
Moab, UT 84532
http://livingrivers.org/

Living Rivers is working to overturn one of the greatest environmental crimes in American history, the damming of Glen Canyon. The goal is to restore not only Glen Canyon, but the much abused Colorado River itself. With a series of restoration initiatives and organizing efforts in both the Colorado and Rio Grande River watersheds, Living Rivers has begun building a popular movement to promote strategies for large-scale river restoration. From the ejidos communities in Mexico, through Indian reservations, farming towns and into metropolitan areas, Living Rivers is engaging people to pressure water agencies to embrace the simple solutions that offer opportunities for restoring our rivers and improving quality of life for millions of people across this arid region. Living Rivers gives you more bang for you bucks than any other American environmental group.

Los Alamos Study Group
2901 Summit Place NE
Albuquerque, NM 87106
505-265-1200
http://www.lasg.org/

Since 1989, the Los Alamos Study Group community has consistently provided leadership on nuclear disarmament and related issues in New Mexico. Their work includes research and scholarship education of decisionmakers, providing an information clearinghouse for journalists, organizing, litigating, and advertising. They place particular emphasis on the education and training of young activists and scholars.

LASG’s careful, reasoned approach developed many whistleblowers in the nuclear labs and plants. Since September 11, 2001, their work has increasingly placed nuclear weapons in the context of aggression abroad and the militarization of our society at home. One of LASG’s most recent campaigns is the effort to end nuclear waste disposal in northern New Mexico. Official estimates place current annual waste generation and burial at Los Alamos at about 45,000 drums’ worth per year, with increases planned if the University of California begins production of plutonium “pits,” the cores of nuclear weapons. New pits are not needed for any existing weapons, but they are needed for some of the new weapons now being designed at Los Alamos, which include weapons specially-tailored for aiming at Third World countries.

Utah Environmental Congress
1817 South Main Street, Ste. 10
Salt Lake City, Utah 84115
Phone (801) 466-4055
http://www.uec-utah.org/

Utah, which still harbors some of the wildest country in the lower-48, is under perpetual siege from uranium and coal mining, oil drilling, tar sands and shale extraction, logging and a crazy scheme to put a nuclear power plant near the small town of Green River. The UEC often finds itself alone on many of these battles. They are a fearless and unflinching outfit that doesn’t back down. Instead they advance. Their latest project is an audacious campaign to break wolves back to Utah. Now that’s a radical and welcome idea!

Wild Idaho Rising Tide
P.O. Box 9817, 
Moscow, Idaho 83843
http://wildidahorisingtide.org/contact-wirt/

Since October 2010, Imperial Oil, a Canadian subsidiary of ExxonMobil, has shipped, barged, and trucked over one hundred pieces of gargantuan, Korean-made, industrial equipment from the Ports of Vancouver and Pasco, Washington, and Lewiston, Idaho. During the next six months, Northwest interstates could be overrun by another 300 transports of these two-lane wide, 500,000-pound “megaloads” escorted by aggressive, industry-sponsored state police. This is the second front in the fight against the tar sands oil frenzy in Canada. Wild Idaho Rising Tide is leading the battle against ExxonMobil’s scheme to turn the Lochsa Wild and Scenic River corridor into  megaload highway.

Wolf Haven 
3111 Offut Lake Rd. SE 
Tenino, Washington 98589
http://www.wolfhaven.org/

Since 1982, Wolf Haven has rescued more than 160 captive-born wolves from private owners, roadside zoos, animal collectors, research and other facilities. At Wolf Haven, these wolves receive a lifetime of compassionate care and are treated with dignity and respect for their wild nature. Wolf Haven is one of only three US pre-release breeding facilities for a multi-agency effort to restore Mexican gray wolves to the Southwest. Wolf Haven is also a foster facility for breeding and housing the endangered red wolf. Awwoooo!!!

Jeffrey St. Clair’s latest book is Born Under a Bad Sky. He is the co-editor of Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, forthcoming from AK Press. He can be reached at: sitka@comcast.net.

 ADVERT PRO NOBIS
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

IF YOU THINK THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA ARE A DISGRACE AND A HUGE OBSTACLE
to real change in America why haven’t you sent at least a few dollars to The Greanville Post (or a similar anti-corporate citizen’s media?). Think about it.  Without educating and organizing our ranks our cause is DOA. That’s why our new citizens’ media need your support. Send your badly needed check to “TGP, P.O. Box 1028, Brewster, NY 10509-1028.” Make checks out to “P. Greanville/ TGP”.  (A contribution of any amount can also be made via Paypal and MC or VISA.)

THANK YOU.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 




Pigs, cows, and chickens are (also) the 99 percent, says animal rights activist

December 17, 2011
 
By Tom Over

Though the products of their bodies seem to be just about every place where we expect to find food, these members of the 99 percent suffer mostly out of sight and out of mind to the omnivore general public. These animals don’t get pepper-sprayed or arrested at protests but spend their entire lives in jail or— as some animal liberationists say— in concentration camps. They need humans to speak up for their rights.

Sarah Von Alt, an animal rights activist working with Mercy For Animals supports the Occupy Movement.  

“MFA stands in solidarity with anyone who works to help animals, and I appreciate that the Occupy movement has included animals in its Official Declaration of the Occupation of New York City — specifically that corporate interests have ‘profited off of the torture, confinement, and cruel treatment of countless nonhuman animals, and actively hide these practices.'” 

Von Alt said as the Occupy movement continues to gain momentum, it is becoming more obvious that Americans have grown weary of corporate power in politics and the resulting abuses of humans and nonhuman animals. 

“While taking to the streets and participating in peaceful protests is one way to raise awareness about these important issues, each of us can start to remove our financial support from Big Ag by transitioning to a healthier, more sustainable plant-based diet. Since cows, pigs and chickens make up 99 out of every 100 animals exploited and killed in this country, in a very real way, they are the 99%,” Von Alt said.

You can find plenty of info about Mercy for Animals online, but here is Von Alt’s overview of the organization. 

“Mercy For Animals is a national non-profit organization dedicated to preventing cruelty to farmed animals and promoting compassionate food choices and policies. We encourage consumers to open their hearts and minds, and widen their circle of compassion beyond family, friends and their beloved companion animals to include all animals,” Von Alt said. 

She said more than 99 percent of animal exploitation and abuse in this country is at the hands of the meat, dairy and egg industries. 

“Farmed animals may not be as cute or fluffy as our dogs and cats at home, but they have the same capacity to feel love, joy, and happiness, as well as sorrow, fear and pain. The best way to help end the needless suffering of cows, pigs, chickens and other farmed animals is simply to not eat them,” Von Alt said.  

She said while MFA’s primary focus is on the animals themselves, transitioning to a plant based diet has shown benefits to human health, as well as our environment. 

“Currently, the leading causes of death in the United States, including heart disease, some forms of cancer, stroke and diabetes have been conclusively linked to diets high in meat, dairy, eggs and other animal products,” Von Alt said.  

The United Nations, Pew Charitable Trusts and other organizations have concluded that animal agriculture is a leading cause of every environmental problem we face — from global greenhouse gas emissions to deforestation to air and water pollution. 

“By transitioning to a healthy and humane vegetarian lifestyle, we can spare animals lives of immeasurable suffering and protect human health and the health of the planet,” Von Alt said.  

In light of this, boycotts of factory farmed meat, dairy and eggs—if not a boycott of them altogether would seem to make sense.

••••••••••••

••••••••••••

“Choosing cruelty-free, plant-based alternatives to meat, dairy and eggs is a powerful way to put your ethics on the table and vote for a kinder world every time you sit down to eat. If you don’t like that animals are made to suffer and die for your dinner — good news! You have options. Leave the meat at the supermarket. You don’t have to continue to financially support an industry that hurts animals, the planet and your health. You can now find vegan versions of almost all your favorite foods– including veggie burgers, soy milk, and dairy-free ice cream — at nearly every grocery store and restaurant. It’s never been easier to adopt a healthy and compassionate vegan diet,” Von Alt said. 

I asked her about using marches as part of a movement for animal rights.  

“MFA volunteers around the country routinely take part in parades, street fairs and festivals to raise awareness about the plights of farmed animals. This was MFA’s sixth year marching in Pride Parades around the country, and as in years past, the crowd response has been amazing.  In fact, since MFA’s inception more than a decade ago, the parallels between the gay rights, animal rights and other social justice movements has been an important theme in our philosophy and message.  As Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, ‘No one is free when others are oppressed.'” 

She said in addition to marching in Pride Parades, MFA seeks to create positive social change by raising awareness about the plights of farmed animals and talking to consumers about the power of their food choices. “In 2011, MFA conducted more than 1,500 public outreach events including vegan feed-ins, tabling events, leafletings and Paid-Per-View screenings. At Paid-Per-View screenings we pay people a dollar to watch a 4-minute clip from Farm to Fridge, an eye-opening exploration behind the closed doors of the nation’s largest industrial poultry, pig, dairy and fish farms, hatcheries, and slaughter plants. Exposing consumers to the realities of modern animal agriculture is a powerful way to inspire change.

BELOW: Remains of a blue hare.  Rather ghastly, isn’t it? While animals in the wild have no choice and predators are wired to kill other animals, we do. Our “violent table” is a question of choice. Plus a vegetable-based diet is enormously more healthful to humans and the planet, not to mention consistent with social justice, considering the hunger problem that still haunts the world.—Eds.

She added, “After learning about the cruelty involved in factory-farmed products, many people think ‘free-range,’ ‘cage-free’ or ‘organic’ meat, eggs and dairy products are the solution. While these products may be less cruel than the typical factory farm products, they still involve needless violence, suffering and death and should not be mistaken for cruelty-free,”  

She said any time an animal, even a free-range animal, is used as a commodity to be consumed — or treated as a piece of property — corners are cut and the animals lose. 

“Animals on ‘free range’ farms are still often forced to live in overcrowded conditions, are mutilated without painkillers (castration, tail docking, debeaking etc.), denied veterinary care and ultimately shipped to slaughter to have their throats cut open, ” said Von Alt. 

This may indicate the challenge of forming alliances between animal liberationists and advocates of so-called humane animal husbandry. This also calls to mind how animal liberation gets relatively little attention in both mainstream and non-mainstream progressive media outlets, not to mention non-progressive media outlets. At the time of posting this content, I’m waiting on a reply from Mercy for Animals regarding the points in this paragraph. 

Von Alt continued, “At Mercy For Animals, we encourage people to remember that the only meaningful difference between a dog or a cat and a cow, pig or chicken is the way that we treat them. If you wouldn’t eat your free-range dog or cat, why would you eat any other animal who has the same passion for life?”  

Von Alt said if a person feels they are not quite willing or able to stop eating animals yet, it is more productive to begin by reducing the amount of meat, diary and eggs one consumes instead of falling for clever marketing schemes designed to make people feel better about paying more for some of the same types of cruelties.  

I’m currently looking for more details about such clever marketing schemes.  I asked Von Alt about the possible role of civil disobedience in the animal liberation movement. 

“Once people become aware of the scale of violence and suffering being routinely inflicted on animals in name of commerce and greed, some understandably turn to civil disobedience to express their outrage and to garner attention on the issue — particularly when the mainstream media seems unwilling to cover these issues otherwise. While we neither condone nor condemn non-violent actions to help animals, MFA continues to work within the law to bring its message of compassion to the masses,” Von Alt said. 

I asked Von Alt to offer ideas about engaging with government so as to save or improve farm animals’ lives. Though removing our financial support from the meat, dairy and egg industries is an easy and powerful way for individual consumers to put their ethics on the table, we shouldn’t stop there, said Von Alt. 

“Concerned citizens can also push their local, state and federal representatives to ban some of the cruelest factory farming practices. For example, MFA volunteers were instrumental in getting California Proposition 2 passed a couple years ago to outlaw veal crates for baby calves, gestation crates for mother pigs and battery cages for egg-laying hens. These types of intensive confinement systems, which don’t even allow the animals to freely move or lie down comfortably for nearly their entire lives, are perhaps the cruelest forms of institutionalized animal abuse in existence. But by raising awareness among the voting public, Prop 2 passed by a landslide and became the most popular ballot initiative in California history,” Von Alt said. 

She said MFA also worked with concerned citizens in Ohio to collect signatures to outlaw similarly cruel practices here.  

“When it became obvious to the industry that the measure may be as popular as the one in California, they decided to come to the table and negotiated a deal with the governor and the animal protection movement to phase out veal crates and gestation crates, place a moratorium on building new battery cage egg facilities and outlawed strangulation as a form of euthanasia,” Von Alt said.

These issues are related to  Ohio’s Livestock Care Standards Board, which was created in early 2010 after the Issue 2 ballot initiative passed in autumn of 2009. Von Alt said while it is important to remember  outlawing some cruel practices does not make these industries cruelty-free, it does help to alleviate the suffering of literally hundreds of millions of animals each year. 

“It is because of citizens who care enough to lobby their elected representatives, to write letters and make phone calls and collect signatures, that these types of initiatives have been so successful,” Von Alt said.  

On the distinction between groups that work for animal rights and those that work for animal welfare, Von Alt said those perspectives are not mutually exclusive. 

“MFA believes non-human animals are irreplaceable individuals with morally significant interests and hence rights. This includes the right to live free from unnecessary suffering and exploitation. We can work toward improving the lives of animals and alleviating their suffering while at the same time being clear that animals should not be exploited at all.”   

Submitters Website: http://herenowandbeyond.net

Submitters Bio:

 ADVERT PRO NOBIS
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

IF YOU THINK THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA ARE A DISGRACE AND A HUGE OBSTACLE
to real change in America why haven’t you sent at least a few dollars to The Greanville Post (or a similar anti-corporate citizen’s media?). Think about it.  Without educating and organizing our ranks our cause is DOA. That’s why our new citizens’ media need your support. Send your badly needed check to “TGP, P.O. Box 1028, Brewster, NY 10509-1028.” Make checks out to “P. Greanville/ TGP”.  (A contribution of any amount can also be made via Paypal and MC or VISA.)

THANK YOU.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 




OpEds: A plea on behalf of animals

Throughout human history, until very recently, cruelty to animals was simply normal...

Editor’s Note:  We are glad to be able to help ANIMAL PEOPLE, the world’s leading independent news magazine dedicated to ecoanimal issues, and a fraternal publication/organization of the Greanville Post. Animal People (AP) came into being in 1992, but its origins date back decades, and can be traced to a lifetime of activism on behalf of animals and exemplary journalism by its founders, Kim Bartlett , and Merritt Clifton, currently president/publisher and editor, respectively.  Lacking trust funds, a solid bank account, or the favor of rich individuals or organizations due to their commitment to reporting the truth about animal questions, AP has survived chiefly thanks to the loyalty of its readers and the sheer stubbornness and boundless resourcefulness of its publisher. Today, AP not only reports the news in its national/international editions, it has also managed to seed and sustain a number of crucial animal defense organizations in some of the most improbable places on earth, from the Balkans to the Indian subcontinent. The letter below is a holiday appeal letter, all the more urgent because of the calamitous state of the economy, which has shrunk the already pitiful “dollar” allotted by Americans to animal problems. (Animal charities continue to get only a fraction of the amounts given to human-oriented issues or religious causes.)  However, if you give it a few minutes you’ll see it’s not just another donor appeal advancing the same old arguments. It’s a letter that also informs and educates —in fact I’m sure you’ll learn something of value, something you didn’t expect to find in this kind of communication. So, if possible, read it, ponder it, and, help our sister organization ANIMAL PEOPLE as generously as you can.

IMAGE: Kim Bartlett holding Dennis, one of her many wards. 

A Word from Animal People—

Dear Friend,

    We all long for a day in which human beings see themselves not as lords and masters of the earth but as good stewards of creation. To get there, the way of thinking about animals as things to be used and abused must be replaced with a model reflecting a more gentle meaning of the word “dominion.”

       Contrary to the connotation of the word that has seemed to justify the tyranny of humans over animals, dominion may be interpreted as “sovereignty” as it exists in human government. A legitimate government holds the collective power of its citizens, and is thus able to exert a measure of authority that serves the best interests of all. What we think of as legitimate sovereignty in the human sphere of government does not include murder and mayhem of the sort practiced by humans against the animal kingdoms.  

  The concept of dominion as brutal domination is sometimes blamed on western religion, because in eastern religions there is no strict line drawn between humans and other animals, and yet in practice, animals in lands where eastern religions have flourished have been subject to the same brutal domination as in the West. The problem of animal cruelty was not caused by any particular religious mindset–though religion has often been used as a justification for mistreatment of animals…continuing even today in barbaric sacrifices practiced by animist religions as well as by some Hindus and Muslims.

      The problem is that throughout human history, until very recently, cruelty to animals was simply normal.

        This letter was supposed to be mailed so that it would reach you some time before the holidays. However, I was determined that it should contain a happy message, and so in late October, I began to read a newly published 696-page book called The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined by Harvard psychology professor Steven Pinker. It took six weeks of very late nights to finish it, and so this letter is late getting to you.

       It was worth the time, though, and while I believe Pinker may over-reach in applying his thesis globally, there is good and surprising news about how and why a decrease in violence, including violence to animals (not an overall decrease but a decrease relative to human population), “happened in a narrow slice of history, beginning in the Age of Reason in the 17th century and cresting with the Enlightenment at the end of the 18th.” This Humanitarian Revolution continued through the 19th century, when slavery was abolished in the West, but it lost momentum during the first half of the 20th century, as the world entered another tragic cycle of war and genocide, with the World Wars the last convulsions of an old order in Europe. Even between the World Wars, however, the idea of an intergovernmental entity dedicated to peace was conceived for the first time. The Humanitarian Revolution energized again in the “Rights Revolutions” that arose in democratic countries in the 1960s and ’70s, which included civil rights, women’s rights, gay rights, and animal rights.

Steven Pinker traces the history of violence back to proto-humans who evolved into humans living in anarchic states, who were eventually subjected to a “pacification process” when states (often in the form of monarchies) emerged. These early governments forced a degree of order on their citizens–though such order did not reduce violence between states or cruel practices within states. Reducing violence required a very long civilizing process which involved the imposition of self-control, the beginning of commerce, and the invention of the printing press in the early Renaissance. According to Pinker, “Some of the early expressions of a genuinely ethical concern for animals took place in the Renaissance. Europeans had become curious about vegetarianism when reports came back from India of entire nations that lived without meat. Several writers, including Erasmus and Montaigne, condemned the mistreatment of animals in hunting and butchery, and one of them, Leonardo da Vinci, became a vegetarian himself.”

        The printing press stimulated a rise in literacy and a sudden burst in the writing of books and pamphlets. The ability to communicate over long distances through a postal system–a side effect of global trade–led to the “Republic of Letters,” a self-proclaimed community of European and American intellectuals who exchanged ideas on various topics such as democracy and human rights, the abolition of slavery, an end to cruel and unusual punishments, and the treatment of animals. Comments Pinker, “The growth of writing and literacy strikes me as the best candidate for an exogenous change that helped set off the Humanitarian Revolution.”  

      ANIMAL PEOPLE’s core mission has always been to help continue the humanitarian revolution for animals through writing, publishing, and the exchange of ideas.

   “The revolution in animal rights is a uniquely emblematic instance of the decline of violence,”  writes Pinker, “and it is fitting that I end my survey of historical declines by recounting it. That is because the change has been driven purely by the ethical principle that one ought not to inflict suffering on a sentient being. Unlike the other Rights Revolutions, the movement for animal rights was not advanced by the affected parties themselves….the animals have nothing to offer us in exchange for our treating them more humanely.”

      Continued Pinker, “Progress has been uneven, and certainly the animals themselves, if they could be asked, would not allow us to congratulate ourselves too heartily just yet. But the trends are real, and they are touching every aspect of our relationship with our fellow animals.”

        There are reasons why dramatic improvements in people’s attitudes about animals haven’t translated into actual reductions of numbers of animals used for specific purposes. Numbers of animals used in biomedical research dipped but then spiked as genetic studies called for greater numbers of designer animals. But this occurred as the result of an explosion in the numbers of studies being done by a thousandfold or more, as measured by published scientific journal articles. The numbers of animals used in each study are now a fraction of what they were just 30 years ago. In the interim, there is a new generation of biomedical researchers who accept strict animal welfare regulations and are more open to dialogue with animal advocates. Though per capita meat consumption is down in the U.S., a preference for fish and fowl over red meat means a greater number of birds and fish are killed for the same pounds of flesh produced by the slaughter of one large mammal (for example, 200 chickens equal the same amount of meat as one cow). Participation in sport hunting and trapping continues its decline, and even though the ethics of sport fishing remains largely unaddressed, there was a 14% decline in fishing participation from 2001 to 2006. The number of unwanted animals being killed in U.S. shelters continues to fall, and that is really good news.

      The Humanitarian Revolution is far from being over. But the fact that almost all the gains in eliminating cruelty have occurred in such a “narrow slice of history” gives us something to ponder. We all look for meaning in our lives…in the world…in the universe. Some may find answers in religion or spirituality. I wonder if the rise of humane principles is related to the idea of “emergent properties.” As expressed in physics, emergent properties are patterns that emerge dynamically from underlying but imperceptible subatomic laws.

      In his book Years of Rice and Salt, writer Kim Stanley Robinson refers to emergent properties in humanistic terms: “I begin to think that this matter of ‘late emergent properties’ that the physicists talk about when they discuss complexity and cascading sensitivities is an important concept for historians. Justice may be a late emergent property. And maybe we can glimpse the beginnings of it emerging; or maybe it emerged long ago, among the primates and proto-humans, and is only now gaining leverage in the world.”  

In Forty Signs of Rain, Robinson wonders if the genetic code has late emergent properties:  “Unless it was infused with some other quality that was not rational, some late emergent property like altruism, or compassion, or love–something that was not a code–then it was all for naught.”

        Steven Pinker resists the temptation to see a cosmic mystery unfolding in the decline of violence: “I can easily resist the temptation, but agree that the multiplicity of datasets in which violence meanders downward is a puzzle worth pondering. What do we make of the impression that human history contains an arrow? Where is this arrow, we are entitled to wonder, and who posted it? And if the alignment of so many historical forces in a beneficial direction does not imply a divine sign painter, might it vindicate some notion of moral realism–that moral truths are out there somewhere for us to discover, just as we discover the truths of science and mathematics?”

    There are obvious and easily analyzed reasons for the rise in humanitarian sensibilities, but there still may be room for mystery. 

      And however much progress has been made, there is much more to do for the animals. But to reinforce our resolve, sometimes we need to acknowledge that our efforts so far have been worthwhile, and to take a moment to celebrate how far we have come. There is no better time than at the end of one year and the beginning of another. 

       During 2012, ANIMAL PEOPLE will celebrate our 20th anniversary. As a supporter of ANIMAL PEOPLE, we invite you to share in the credit for all the things we have done to advance the humanitarian revolution for animals through writing, publishing, and the exchange of ideas, and we ask you to help continue this work with a generous end-of-year donation today. ANIMAL PEOPLE is counting on you to help us move forward. Just as animal people today owe so much to those in the past who began protesting the cruel treatment of animals, animal advocates in the future will build their achievements on top of what we are accomplishing today.

               Sending bright wishes for the new year for all creatures, 

                Kim Bartlett, president of ANIMAL PEOPLE

______________________________________________

Postal mailing address: P.O. Box 960, Clinton WA 98236 U.S.A.

email <ANPEOPLE@whidbey.com>  web-site:   http://www.animalpeoplenews.org/     

We believe that the Golden Rule applies to animals,  too.

 ADVERT PRO NOBIS
________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

IF YOU THINK THE LAMESTREAM MEDIA ARE A DISGRACE AND A HUGE OBSTACLE
to real change in America why haven’t you sent at least a few dollars to The Greanville Post (or a similar anti-corporate citizen’s media?). Think about it.  Without educating and organizing our ranks our cause is DOA. That’s why our new citizens’ media need your support. Send your badly needed check to “TGP, P.O. Box 1028, Brewster, NY 10509-1028.” Make checks out to “P. Greanville/ TGP”.  (A contribution of any amount can also be made via Paypal and MC or VISA.)

THANK YOU.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________