Goose love, in sickness and in health

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



Fred Dommer

Giving us a respite from the tons of propaganda dross they usually peddle as legitimate information, CBS Sunday included this morning a little story about an injured goose whose companion would not abandon him, after the humans had "captured" him.  (In this case, fortunately for all, it was professional wildlife rehabilitators at The New England Wildlife Center who assisted the injured animal, baptised Arnold by the rehabbers, while his mate was called Amelia).  Arnold's story, therefore, ended pretty well. Now, we don't want to be killjoys, especially when so many need a bit of hope about fellow humans as we confront one of history's greatest crises, but it is I think) our duty to provide some of the broader context relating to this story.  And the context is simply "goose hunting", a legal activity in which millions engage every year using all manner of death-dealing tools trained on all types of waterfowl: ducks, geese, etc. It's a veritable industry in which arms and ammo manufacturers, guides and "outfitters", and the states' departments of wildlife management participate, all to the detriment of these defenseless animals, conveniently tagged as "fair game", literally to do as humans please.


Incidentally, while many hunters will tell you they hunt to eat the meat that is usually a less than honorable excuse. While no doubt in a nation with increasing numbers of poor folks some people will indeed hunt animals to eat, the vast majority of hunters spend sizable amounts —from hundreds to thousands of dollars (or far more than that when we talk about safaris to Africa, or other exotic places)—supposedly on a hunt for meat they could easily buy at the local supermarket. So, educate yourself about hunting.


Check out the links below:

• 9 Things No One Told You About Hunting

• Why Sport Hunting Is Cruel and Unnecessary
• Why Do Hunters Enjoy Killing Animals?
PS/ If you have a friend who is a "sport" hunter, do show him this story. Maybe this Fall he won't be joining the millions who go into the wild with shotguns and other implements of death to kill geese as if they were simply living targets. 
 
 

The New England Wildlife Center in Massachusetts has treated thousands of injured animals, but one recent case stands out: A Canada goose named Arnold with a badly-damaged foot, who was visited each day during his convalescence by his mate, dubbed Amelia. Steve Hartman reports on an inspiring avian couple.
 

Appendix

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of  The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience. 


Thank you for visiting our animal defence section. Before leaving, please take a moment to reflect on these mind-numbing institutionalized cruelties.  The wheels of business and human food compulsions are implacable and totally lacking in compassion. This is a downed cow, badly hurt, but still being dragged to slaughter. Click on this image to fully appreciate this horror repeated millions of times every day around the world. With plentiful non-animal meat substitutes that fool the palate, there is no longer reason for this senseless suffering. And meat consumption is a serious ecoanimal crime. The tyranny of the palate must be broken. Please consider changing your habits and those around you in this regard.


All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors. 
YOU ARE FREE TO REPRODUCE THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED YOU GIVE PROPER CREDIT TO THE GREANVILLE POST
VIA A BACK LIVE LINK. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

black-horizontal


black-horizontal

Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days. 
[newsletter_form]




Team Lioness: Women rangers protecting Africa’s wildlife | IFAW

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON IT.




Celebrating strength and frontline heroes this World Ranger Day




 
The inspirational story of eight brave women who shattered their glass ceiling to protect wildlife. Team Lioness was created by the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) as an all-women wildlife ranger unit in Kenya. When COVID-19 sidelined many state-run ranger units, Team Lioness was one of the only active groups. They were left as the first line of defense to stop poachers and the killing of elephants, lions, giraffes, cheetahs and other wildlife on their traditional Massai land bordering Amboseli National Park. They are the first women in their families to secure employment and pioneers of women's empowerment, creating new opportunities and possibilities for the women in their tribe. ➡ Subscribe: https://bit.ly/IFAWSubscribe Follow IFAW on social: YouTube: https://bit.ly/IFAWYouTube Facebook: https://bit.ly/IFAWFacebook Instagram: https://bit.ly/IFAWInstagram

It takes an individual of immense character to be an IFAW Wildlife Ranger. These brave men and women protect wildlife from the front lines while simultaneously bridging gender gaps, establishing generationally sustainable revenue streams and creating systems to save critical populations. This upcoming World Ranger Day, we celebrate and support the incredible strength of rangers across the globe who work every day to protect animals and the wild places they call home. As we celebrate this special day on July 31st, we ask you to show support by sharing how you're #RangerStrongFor wildlife and the individuals who put everything on the line to protect animals.


Will you be #RangerStrongfor Team Lioness? See the women-rangers in action as they break glass ceilings and help protect iconic wildlife in Kenya. 

Team Lioness is one of Kenya’s first all-women wildlife ranger units. As Community Wildlife Rangers (CWR), the women help protect nearly 150,000 acres of traditional Masaai community lands that encompass Amboseli National Park in Kenya. Poaching is the cause of three out of every five African elephant deaths. The obstacles they’re up against are complex and demand immediate action. Wildlife rangers possess the mental fortitude to dismantle criminal networks using sophisticated technologies and counterterrorism tactics to harness, analyze and distribute information about poaching hotspots.  

COVID-19 brought new challenges to IFAW's Wildlife Rangers. As essential workers, the rangers were quarantined and separated from their families during these challenging times. The drop in tourism has led to limited resources, causing many areas to see an increase in poaching and illegal activity. Our rangers continue to be the first line of defense in the field, playing a critical role in the protection of Africa's most iconic wildlife.

Are you #RangerStrongFor wildlife? Take our quiz and test your animal knowledge

Wildlife rangers are selected based on their integrity, mental strength and physical strength. The job requires great intelligence to predict and prevent a poacher's next strike, and determination to meet all physical demands. At a moment’s notice, a call could come in about a poaching cell encroaching into a protected park. Ranger teams deploy immediately, oftentimes remaining away from their camp for days while tracking and dismantling poaching rings. 

When IFAW realized ordinary approaches to stopping elephant poachers weren’t working, we tried something new. We connected people who had never worked together before. Now, IFAW Wildlife Rangers work in concert with military intelligence officers, local residents and law enforcement, forming a rapid response network: tenBoma. The network is named after an East African saying that a community becomes safer when ten houses come together to look out for each other. Since its inception, we have seen an increase of 1,700 more elephants in Kenya’s Tsavo Conservation Area.  

IFAW Wildlife Rangers are frontline heroes dedicated to saving iconic species. This World Ranger Day, join IFAW as we celebrate their strength. Follow the #RangerStrongFor hashtag across social for ways you can participate.


Addendum
Meet eight Maasai rangers -- the first women in their families to get jobs -- fighting poaching around Kenya's Amboseli National Park
 
Packing her bags to go home for the first time in over four months, Maasai ranger Purity Lakara -- who patrols lands in Kenya's Amboseli National Park, known for its free-roaming elephants and views of Mount Kilimanjaro -- is overjoyed to be seeing her family for the first time since the Covid-19 pandemic was declared.

"I missed eating together, playing and hanging around with my baby girl, fetching water for my mum -- even helping my brothers herding cattle. I have missed everything that we usually do while I'm at home," she says.
Lakara, 23, is one of eight women -- the first in their families to secure employment -- who make up Team Lioness, a unit within the Olugului Community Wildlife Rangers (OCWR).
The rangers patrol the Olugului/Olarashi Group Ranch (OOGR), a 580-square-mile horseshoe of community-owned land that almost encircles Amboseli National Park, a safari destination 134 miles southeast of Nairobi.


Children run to welcome Purity Amleset Lakara, a member of the all-female IFAW-supported Team Lioness on her arrival at her home village in Meshenani, Amboseli, in Kenya. Paolo Torchio/IFAW



 
When Kenya closed its regional and international borders and the tourism industry and livestock markets on which the community depends disappeared, OCWR canceled all leave and asked its rangers, including Team Lioness, to stay at their posts indefinitely to protect wildlife from desperate poachers. Now that the country is cautiously yet optimistically opening and safari visitors are returning, the rangers are finally able to return to their villages, two by two.
 
When Lakara arrived in Meshenani on July 29, she was met by neighbors and family members who escorted her to her home, singing and clapping as she cradled her 2-year-old daughter.


Purity Amleset Lakara is escorted home by her eldest brother Maantoi Lakara and other members of her family. Paolo Torchio/IFAW


 
"My mother said that she was very happy right now because I'm back. She say that they have been longing for this day, so they are all here near me, enjoying and celebrating again," says Lakara, who is the sole breadwinner for her 11-member family.
Genesis of Team Lioness
Team Lioness was established by the global nonprofit International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) in early 2019 after Maasai community leader Kiruyan Katamboi, affectionately referred to as Mama Esther, challenged the organization to employ women from the community as rangers.


A typical day for Team Lioness might begin at 5 a.m. with a run and breakfast, followed by a briefing and morning patrol, which typically takes four hours. Paolo Torchio/IFAW


 
Because Maasai communities are patriarchal, women are excluded from leadership and decision making and the community ranger unit that patrols the Group Ranch was exclusively male.
Christopher Kiarie, IFAW program operations and grants manager, says that while IFAW was enthusiastic about the suggestion, men in the OCWR and wider community were skeptical that women were up to the job. The community lands are vast, almost half the size of the state of Rhode Island, and a typical OCWR patrol can cover 12 miles of difficult terrain on foot, often in poor conditions.

Unlike the Kenya Wildlife Service, which patrols the Amboseli National Park, the OCWR are unarmed, so have to rely on skill when dealing with dangerous animals or violent people and call KWS for back-up if they think a situation might turn nasty.

Even the women nominated for Team Lioness, one by each of the community's eight clans, had their doubts.
"Before I was thinking like I would not make it," admits ranger Sharon Nankinyi. "But after we were training, then we became very strong ladies. We proved to the community that what a man can do, a woman can do better."
Grueling work
Under normal conditions, Team Lioness rangers typically work three weeks on, when they rotate around the OCWR's six camps and mobile unit, and one week off.

A typical day might begin at 5 a.m. with a run and breakfast, followed by a briefing and morning patrol, which typically takes four hours. Depending on their daily assignments, the rangers might spend the afternoon on base, ready to respond to an emergency call before a debrief of the day's activities.

Other than occupying separate sleeping and bathing quarters, they do exactly the same job as their 68 male colleagues and are assigned patrols in co-ed groups of varying sizes.


Community ranger Eunice Mantei Nkapaiya sits with her colleagues in their camp. The women were away from their families for months while they worked the bush. Will Swanson/IFAW


 
They note the locations and activities of wildlife, talk with members of the local community to learn of any suspicious or problematic activity, and pitch in whenever help is needed -- perhaps getting a stuck baby elephant out of a muddy waterhole or locating children who have roamed too far from the village.
While two-thirds of the men in the ranger unit are illiterate, the members of Team Lioness are educated to the equivalent of a high school diploma and excel at writing the reports essential to IFAW's "tenBoma" approach to wildlife security, in which the organization partners with other NGOs and ranger teams, community members and Interpol to combine actionable local intelligence and data analysis.

OCWR's Director of Operations Patrick Papatiti says as he observed the team working to persuade community members from hunting lions or hyenas that killed livestock, he could see that the male rangers, selected because they ranked among the community's best warriors, have changed their attitudes working with women.

"I can without a doubt see [the men] now take them as colleagues," he says.


The danger of being a ranger
Working as a wildlife ranger anywhere in the world is a tough, dangerous gig.

Every year, the International Ranger Federation and Thin Green Line Foundation mark World Ranger Day on July 31 by publishing a roll of honor commemorating the rangers and staff in similar roles known to have died on duty over the past 12 months.

Of the 138 deaths recorded on this year's roll, almost a third were homicides. Alongside natural causes, drownings, wildlife attacks and motor vehicle accidents, their 2020 roll featured a new cause-of-death category: Covid-19, to which five of the rangers listed had succumbed.

The pandemic has only made Team Lioness' job harder.


 

Wildlife rangers keep their distance from local herders while interviewing them for information. Will Swanson/IFAW


 
Huge losses in tourism revenue -- Kiarie says that Amboseli National Park's revenues declined more than 90% -- forced government-funded agencies in the region to cut back on patrols.
Because the OCWR's funding via IFAW is donation-based and not affected in the same way, the community rangers stepped up operations to fill the gap. During a week when the risk of poaching was deemed particularly high, Team Lioness scaled up from its typical one or two patrols to three patrols a day, collectively covering more than 35 miles on foot.

Social distancing measures have made it hard for rangers to meet with community members to gather intelligence about potential poaching activity or resolve issues. Communication is already hard to maintain on community lands because of poor cell reception, a problem compounded by wet weather during this time of year.

When camp solar panels can't generate power, the rangers have to turn their phones off to conserve battery, further minimizing opportunities to receive timely tips on poaching activity -- something even more pressing now when many people have sold much of their livestock and hardships are more keenly felt.

"Since Corona started, there's bushmeat poaching because now people are jobless. [They] end up killing gazelle, killing giraffes, so that [they] can feed their children," says ranger Nankinyi.


Depending on their daily assignments, the rangers might spend the afternoon on base, ready to respond to an emergency call before a debrief of the day's activities. Paolo Torchio/IFAW


 
After receiving a tip from the local community in April, the OCWR dispatched a patrol -- which included three members of Team Lioness -- and discovered that four men had killed a giraffe the day prior, roasted the meat and left what they couldn't eat to collect later. The rangers called on KWS for support and set an ambush. When the men returned, they were arrested.
"It's very bad when the same people that you are working with [in the community], telling them the importance of wild animals, and you find them killing those wild animals," says Ruth Sikeita, one of the rangers on the scene.

Papatiti says that while bushmeat poaching incidents have increased over time, the killing of elephants for ivory has declined. He estimates that between three to five elephants were poached on community lands annually from when the OCWR was established in 2010 until IFAW began to support the unit in 2018, when only one elephant was lost. No more elephants have been killed on the Group Ranch since.

"I attribute the success to dedication from rangers and how we built a very good relationship with the community, which is our source of intel," explains Papatiti.

Impact of Covid-19
The members of Team Lioness also have more familiar worries associated with Covid-19.


Being a ranger is a challenging job, but the rangers say the forced separation from their families has been the worst part. Paolo Torchio/IFAW


According to Johns Hopkins University, as of Sept 4, there were 34,884 confirmed cases of Covid-19 throughout Kenya, and 584 related deaths.
The WHO didn't respond to requests for case counts in Amboseli, but Papatiti believes 17 cases and five deaths have been reported there, although he has no data specific to the community ranch.

IFAW provides masks, gloves and hand sanitizer to protect rangers rotating to their home villages against contracting Covid-19. If any of the rangers feel unwell, OCWR has arranged for staff from a nearby hospital to test them at the base.

Now that Kenya is slowly opening up -- interregional travel was permitted from July and international air travel resumed on August 1 -- local people have concerns that the increased movement of people, especially those from outside Kenya, carries risk.

"We are seeing on the TV, hearing that Europe and the US are the countries most affected, so we have that fear they will bring the disease here," says Ruth Sikeita.

There are other pandemic-related shifts, too. Because the schools have been closed for so long, children will likely fall out of the education system as they try to find ways to support their family. Young women who doubt the pandemic will end may get married earlier.

"It is very sad. We need the ladies to get the education so that they can join us in Team Lioness," says Nankinyi.
On a personal level, the rangers say the forced separation from their families has been the worst part.
A changing community

After four months in the field Ruth Sekeita Losiaik a member of the IFAW-supported Team Lioness, was reunited with her two-year-old son Bonham Shirim. Paolo Torchio/IFAW


 
Back in her village, reunited with her two children, Ruth Sikeita comments on how her 8-year-old daughter Priscilla has grown taller and her son Bonham, 3, is talking more. She's grateful to her mother-in-law, who is supportive of wildlife protection initiatives, for caring for her children while she was working.
"They are very healthy, you can now see," she says, lightly pinching her son's arm. "They're very clean. So I thank her, and to the whole community."

Team Lioness' success has not only changed perceptions around the OCWR but is influencing attitudes to gender roles in the community.

"Before, we were not allowed to speak to the men around, we are not allowed to speak to our fathers in the table, to share or to to eat supper or breakfast all together," says Nankinyi.

"We were just thinking like we are nothing to the community, we are just fit for fetching water, giving birth. But now we've broken the taboo that we can work with the men."

Looking forward to a post-pandemic world, the members of Team Lioness want to continue to develop their skills and knowledge, and impact on the community. Christopher Kiarie says that IFAW will work with telecommunication companies and the local government to improve coverage across community lands and will soon deploy a radio system secured for the rangers with assistance from the EU.

"Once the radio equipment is operationalized, communication amongst the community rangers will be boosted in a big way," he says.

Every member of Team Lioness wants to see more women join their ranks.

"In the community there are more ladies who are admiring this job, so I'm sure that if that opportunity comes out, there are more ladies will be coming here for an interview. It will be even more numbers than what is expected," says Purity Lakara, adding that she wants to see the number of female rangers equal or exceed the number of men.
Papatiti is also eager to recruit more women.

"The number will be determined by the availability of funds. When I am given a green light I will kick start the process," he says. 

Thank you for visiting our animal defence section. Before leaving, please join us in a moment of compassion and reflection.

The wheels of business and human food compulsions are implacable and totally lacking in compassion. This is a downed cow, badly hurt, but still being dragged to slaughter. Click on this image to fully appreciate this horror repeated millions of times every day around the world. With plentiful non-animal meat substitutes that fool the palate, there is no longer reason for this senseless suffering. Meat consumption is a serious ecoanimal crime. The tyranny of the palate must be broken. Please consider changing your habits in this regard.


 


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.

black-horizontal
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]

 




David Doel and David Pakman file reports on the latest successful prank by a/r activists against big Animal Farming.

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


David Doel and David Pakman file reports on the latest successful prank by a/r activists against big Factory Farming.


Animal rights activist punks Fox News

Animal rights activist Matt Johnson punked Fox Business by posing as the CEO of Smithfield Foods. Hilarity ensues.



And here's the longer version of the interview, worth watching indeed.


https://davidpakman.com/teddy



This post is part of our Orphaned Truths series with leading cultural and political analysts. People you can trust.

The Jimmy Dore Show • Fiorella Isabel — Craig Pasta Jardula (The Convo Couch) • Abby Martin (The Empire Files)
Lee Camp’s Redacted Tonight • Caleb Maupin • Krystal Ball

Max Blumenthal • Ben Norton • Aaron Maté (The Grayzone) • Caitlin Johnstone • Chris Hedges


[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]





 


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


 




Ecology Alert: If Honeybees become extinct…why their loss could sting.

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

One out of every three bites of food relies on the hard work of the mighty honeybee.

The honeybee is a diligent worker, pollinating 70 percent of the crops that contribute to a significant quantity of the world’s food supply.

However, their numbers are in fast decline, and that spells disaster in more ways than one. Even Cheerios has pulled the honeybee from their boxes of cereal to bring awareness to this cause. From the food they produce to the jobs they create, honeybees have a bigger impact on the U.S. economy than you might think. Curious what all the buzz is about? Continue reading to learn more about the real impact of honeybees in America.

RATES OF DECLINE ACROSS THE U.S.

rates decline across us

The honeybee population has been in steady decline for years, and since 2015, their population has been declining at an even more alarming rate.

Between January and March 2015, nearly half of the honeybee population in Ohio was lost due to potentially 60 different factors, and more than a third of the honeybees in Illinois died. Between April and June 2015, between 2 percent and 19 percent of the honeybee populations across the entire U.S. died. During the summer months, nearly a third of the honeybees in Arkansas died, and between October and the end of December, 40 percent of the honeybees in Kansas had perished.

Between January and March 2016, honeybee populations were still on the decline, and almost half of the remaining bees in Oklahoma disappeared.

The National Agricultural Statistics Service and the USDA have recorded losses from 29% to 45% between 2010 and 2015. Despite the efforts of beekeepers across the country and research to understand these trends, between 12 percent and 18 percent of the honeybees in the U.S. were lost each quarter between March 2015 and March 2016.

DAMAGE TO THE HONEYBEE POPULATION

So, what’s causing all of this damage to the honeybee population in the U.S.?

The No. 1 stressor on honeybee colonies is varroa mites. Largely found in Florida, these mites feed off of adult honeybees and those unhatched or maturing (called brood). The mites actually develop on the honeybee brood, allowing them to overtake adult bees as they grow, and move from colony to colony by attaching themselves to agricultural workers and drones.

Other pests and parasites like tracheal mites, small hive beetles, and wax moths, as well as the disease nosema, are also having a negative impact on the health of the honeybee population. Hive beetles are native to the sub-Saharan areas of Africa but have been found outside of the region around nests of the honeybee.

Pesticides, weather, and diseases have also had significant adverse impacts on the honeybee population in the U.S., together accounting for over 20 percent of colonies lost in 2015 and 2016.  

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BEES AND PRODUCE

 
The importance of honeybees isn’t just about bees or honey. Because a third of global food productionis reliant on pollinators, many of the most common fruits and vegetables are dependent on some aspect of the honeybee pollination process.

For example, almonds are 100 percent reliant on the honeybee. In fact, the relationship between bees and almonds is symbiotic. Almond trees require cross-pollination to grow, and male bees move pollen between the plants, helping them to thrive. In return, almond pollen is considered a natural form of food and nutrition for bees.

Apples, avocados, and blueberries are also extremely dependent on the honeybee’s pollination skills. For avocados, while there may be only one seed in the entire fruit, more than 20 pollen grains are needed before a flower can produce one. Honeybees are also more efficient at pollinating when it comes to apple and cherry orchards compared to nectar collectors, which helps these delicious fruits mature so we can enjoy them.  

THE COST OF LOSING BEES

Losing the honeybee doesn’t just mean fewer almonds and apples for our salads and treats, it means big bucks for the U.S. economy. Because so many of the foods we eat every day are dependent on pollinators for production, losing a major player in the game like the honeybee would be devastating to our food economy.

The financial impact of losing the honeybee population would be greatest in the almond industry. Combining the sale of almonds and wages of those employed to help maintain them (earning an average pay of $20,000 every year), the almond industry adds roughly $5.9 billion to the U.S. economy. The cost of the production of apples adds over $2.9 billion every year, and the broccoli and onion industries each contribute well over $800 million to our economy.

Today, 1 in 12 jobs across the country are directly connected to agriculture. In total, the honeybee contribution equates to well over $16 billion dollars a year and helps employ hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S.   

TINY BUT FIERCE

The honeybee is a mighty little creature. While you may see one and think nothing of it, honeybees are hard at work for most of their lives, helping to keep the food we eat every day flourishing and readily available for our consumption. While they may not realize it, they also contribute to our economy by helping to grow fruits and vegetables and provide working opportunities for hundreds of thousands of agricultural workers across the country.

However, despite their integral place in our agricultural society, honeybees are dying off at a profound rate. While we may recognize some of the causes, there is still more work to be done to correct the effects and truly understand the rate of their demise. If you want to help change their fate, consider reducing the pesticides you use in your home garden around plants that bees might be pollinating, and if you have these kinds of plants, you can register your garden with the Pollinator’s Partnership database to help promote the protection of pollinators and their ecosystem. You can also help your community's local beekeepers by buying locally grown produce. The small efforts might have a profound effect on our bee communities. The fate of the honeybees will have a much more profound impact on our economy if we don’t.

METHODOLOGY

Using data published by the USDA, we visualized the instability of honeybee colonies across the United States. The 2016 USDA study that was used in this campaign reports on colony operations for agricultural purposes. A 2000 Cornell study on the honeybee's contribution to U.S. crop production was used to visualize the reliance of U.S. crops on the honeybee as a pollinator, as well as to determine the economic impact of the honeybee on U.S. agriculture.

FAIR USE STATEMENT

Excited by all the buzz we’ve generated on this subject? We would love to see our study posted on your website or blog; please just ensure a link back to this page, so your readers can see our findings in their entirety and, like the honeybee, earn credit for their work.

Covid-19 has put this site on ventilators.
DONATIONS HAVE DRIED UP... 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW





[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS


Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.







Climate Change is Responsible for Devastating Wildfires

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


This post is part of a series on humans' destruction of the natural world.



The actual causes of wildfires are widely misunderstood.

ith large fires still raging around the West, we can all feel empathy for those who lost their homes and even entire communities, as well as all of us suffering from the smoke. [As well as the incalculable suffering of animals.]

Still, there is a tremendous amount of smoke and mirrors about the blazes and their cause.

The timber industry, Forest Service, and forestry schools are quick to suggest that logging can reduce large blazes. Rushing to log more of the forest will not solve the problem, indeed, it can worsen it. Subsidized logging takes funds away from solutions that can protect communities.

First, we must address many of the misguided information.

1. Climate change is driving the larger blazes we are experiencing in the West. Higher daily temperatures, extreme drought, low humidity, and high winds resulting from climate change exacerbate flammability of the vegetation. Extreme fire weather is driving large blazes, not fuels.

2. Fire suppression has not altered fire regimes in most plant communities. For instance, the Douglas fir forests on the west slope of the Cascades now burning in Oregon tend to have natural fire intervals of 300-500 years. Fire suppression has not altered the natural fire cycle at all.

Most plant communities including lodgepole pine, aspen, sagebrush, juniper, high elevation fir forests, and so on tend to experience fires hundreds of years apart. During this period, they are accumulating fuels, but that is the natural consequence of their ecology, not a result of fire suppression.

3. Forests are not destroyed by high severity fires. They rejuvenate them. Large fires create much needed habitat for numerous species. Consider some studies suggest up to 2/3 of all wildlife species depend on the snag habitat and down logs that result from such blazes.

4. Winds are the driving force in all large fires. When you have high winds, it blows embers over, around and through any “fuel reduction” projects. That is why fires like the 2017 Eagle Fire in Oregon was able to cross a mile and a half of the Columbia River to ignite fires in Washington. There are many other examples of fires crossing 16 lane freeways and other areas with no “fuel”. The idea that we can preclude large fires by more “active forest management” is pure delusion.

5. Indeed, active forest management can contribute to larger and more severe fires because it opens up the forest to greater drying and more wind penetration. One recent study reviewed 1500 fires around the West and found the highest severity blazes occurred in areas with “active forest management” while protected landscapes like wilderness where presumably fuels were higher, burned less intensely.


Climate change and its curses is but the tail end of an age-old human attitude of wanton neglect and hyper-exploitation of nature and living nature (animals) for the sake of human benefit, often for highly questionable activities damaging a huge number of fellow humans. 

Plus, after logging, you enhance the growth of shrubs, grasses, and small trees which are the fine fuels that carries fires. Removing large trees as advocated by the timber industry is a false solution since large trees do not readily burn—rather it is the fine fuels like needles, small branches and cones which are the main fuel for fires. That is why you have snags left after a fire—the large boles do not burn easily.

6. Much of what is burning in the large California fires as well as elsewhere in the West is not forest at all, but chaparral, grasslands, sagebrush, and non-forested habitat. So “active forest management” would have no influence upon much of the acreage currently in flames.

7. We cannot preclude large fires through forest management, but we can reduce the impacts on humans. A shift from logging the forest miles from communities to an emphasis on reducing the flammability of houses and communities, planning evacuation route, burying power lines, zoning to reduce sprawl, and other measures can help.

8. The ultimate (but not sole) cause of these large conflagration is climate change. We need to address the causes of global climate change and make this a national priority. 

9. We cannot preclude large fires through forest management, but we can reduce the impacts on humans. An emphasis on reducing communities’ flammability, planning escape routes, burying power lines, and other proven measures can reduce human suffering.

10. The ultimate cause of these massive conflagrations is climate change. We need to address the causes of global climate change and make this a national priority.

George Wuerthner has published 36 books including Wildfire: A Century of Failed Forest Policy. He serves on the board of the Western Watersheds Project.



Addendum/ Discussion
Special Dossier
The following materials are excerpted from Quora, unless indicated otherwise. Everything reprinted below this line done as a public service due to gravity of the issues involved. 

"How come in the Californian wildfires, the houses are gone but the trees are not?"

 

There is a common misperception that says wildfires should burn an area somewhat completely, and that it is highly unusual to see sporatic burning of structures, or to see near complete destruction of structures with numerous trees still standing. This misperception assumes that a given burn area had to have been burned by the prinary source of the wildfire, or the "Wall of Fire."

The primary Wall of Fire usually moves very quickly through an area, due to wind conditions and the resulting momentum. This means that only the driest and most compustible materials can burn, before the raging fire rushes onward. In the Paradise fire, for example, the fire didn't have time to reach all the way up into the canopy of the trees. In many sections of neighborhood, the Wall of Fire is not what burned the houses to the ground either. Some of the completely devastated neighborhoods never even met with the Wall of Fire.

So then, how do we explain why trees were left standing when houses were burned to the ground? What devastated many of the structures, and even those not meeting with the Wall of Fire, was something called "Firebrands." These are extremely hot embers, made of varying masses of material, usually vegetation. Firebrands can travel MILES from the original source of wildfire, spreading destruction as they rain down like snow and create "Spot Fires."

Billions of these Firebrands fly into neighborhoods, and they land on flammable roofs, rain gutters choked with dead leaves, and vegetation surrounding the structures. The resulting Spot Fires are much more likely than the "Big Flame Fronts," to take a structures completely to the ground. These Spot Fires can also burn certain areas of a neighborhood and not others. In the Paradise, CA fire however, nearly every structure was leveled.

So then, why didn't Spot Fires take down all those neighborhood trees? Most of them are native trees that were preserved when the neighborhoods were built. These trees have had 10's of thousands of years to adapt to California wildfires. In fact, experts can check the amount of scarring that a tree has and determine how many wildfires it has survived. Sometimes the number is 50 or more wildfires that a tree has survived!

There are a multitude of ways in which native trees have adapted to wildfires. Many trees will shed their lower limbs, thereby removing the lower source of fuel for the fire, and helping to protect the top canopy of the tree. The bark is really quite thick, and it insulates the tree's core from the fire. Some trees actually drop a section of bark when it is able to catch and maintain fire. The burning bark drops to the ground and saves the trunk! Trees can also activate their sap system to distribute sap into all of its cracks and crevices, forming a layer of further insulation from heat and flames.

Trees contain a lot of water, and this acts as a fire retardant. Green wood is incredibly difficult to burn. The truck can still be quite green, even if the branches and foliage are dry. When trees are cut for firewood, it takes about 3 months for the wood to season, or to become dry enough to burn. Freshly cut wood is near impossible to burn, even with gasoline. You might scorch the outer bark, but the inner wood is still intact. The density, size, and even the cylindrical shape of the tree trunk, also help to insulate it from burning. These trees are amazing feats of thousands of years of adaptation to their environment!

 

 
 

[dropcap]I [/dropcap]know that this is quite counterintuitive, but large chunks of wood are surprisingly fire-resistant. Sure, the outer layer may get charred, but the inner core remains perfectly strong.

So it is in fires like these. They sweep through, fueled by dry underbrush and grass, driven by high winds. They may singe the outside of trees, and even burn the leaves off, but in many cases the tree is still alive.

But houses, on the other hand, are covered with things that burn (shingles, trim), filled with things that burn (rugs, furniture, cars), and covered in holes that let the fire get in (windows).

If you look at houses which have been rebuilt in burned areas in the past 25 years, you will notice that the houses are specifically designed to be self-protecting. This includes things such as clay roofs, no exterior wood trim, fire shutters on windows, etc.

From 5 Ways to Protect Your Home From Wildfires:

Thus, the goal of wildfire preparation measures is not to fireproof your home and property, but rather to limit its ability to act as a fuel source. “You’re not gonna eliminate all fire,” Steinberg cautions. “You’ll have some embers blowing in, maybe some grass catching on fire. What you want to do is eliminate its ability to do real harm.” Here are five strategies to guide your efforts, starting with the house itself and working outward.

 
 

 
 
[dropcap]C[/dropcap]alifornia has had wildfires for tens of thousands of years. As such, the native tree species tend to be highly resistant to fire.

California’s climate can best be described as “cool wet winters, hot dry summers”. Trees tend to be drought resistant, as does the grassland and other plants in the area. Any plant life that couldn’t withstand fire and drought just didn’t make it to the present.

Take the redwood. The bark on a redwood is very thick and the canopy is very high. It takes a hot, hot fire to get through the bark (which is nearly fireproof) and a very large fire to reach the flammable leaves. The same is true of the sequoia. Bristlecone pines, which can survive extreme drought, can be five thousand years old - you don’t make it that long without being able to survive a fire, or fifty fires.

In fact, fire is necessary for some of these trees to propagate. Sequoia seeds won’t germinate in leaf piles, but will in ash. Many species of trees wait until fires before they release their seeds, taking advantage of newly vacant land.

And trees can grow back very quickly after a fire - they’re very resistant to damage and fire often opens up a path to sunshine that a tree can take advantage of. It works the same with ice in my home country. A few years ago we had a massive ice storm that badly damaged trees. Go down the same streets today and you see beautiful trees that have grown past their damage.

And most of the wildfires don’t start in the forest anyway - they start in nearby grassland which can become tinder dry in late summer and starts burning with even the slightest provocation. One improperly discarded cigarette butt can turn into an inferno in moments.

Thousands of Homes Incinerated but Trees Still Standing: Paradise Fire's Monstrous Path

'It was an urban conflagration,” Pangburn said. “It was structure-to-structure-to-structure ignition that carried the fire through this community.'

BY THOMAS CURWEN AND JOSEPH SERNA, LOS ANGELES TIMES / NOVEMBER 20, 2018

 

“It was an urban conflagration,” Pangburn said. “It was structure-to-structure-to-structure ignition that carried the fire through this community.”

Located in the Sierra foothills at an elevation that favored Ponderosa pines, Paradise might have seemed susceptible to the ravages of a forest fire. But what Pangburn realized is that the Camp Fire had changed its character upon entering the town — and in that revelation lay the hope for preventing tragedies such as this from happening again.

Fires that spread from house to house generate a force of their own. Embers, broadcast by the wind, find dry leaves, igniting one structure then another, and the cycle is perpetuated block after block. Break that cycle and the fire quits, and destruction can be minimized.

Paradise, though, never had that chance. Defensible space and hardened structures could not have kept the firestorm, carried on gusts clocking in the low 50s and feeding on the homes and low-lying vegetation, from reducing the town to ash.

Most telling were the trees. Most of the pines that sheltered this community still had their canopies intact. The needles, yellowed from the intense heat, were not burned — evidence that the winds that morning had pushed the fire along so fast it never had a chance to rise into the trees. But as a surface fire, it lit up the homes that lay in its path.

“I don’t know if there was anything that could have been done to save Paradise,” Pangburn said. “It was some of the most intense fire behavior that I have ever witnessed.”

More than a week later — with 79 fatalities and some 700 still missing, more than 10,000 homes destroyed and 150,000 acres consumed — Pangburn says there is opportunity in this destruction.

“The Camp Fire has been the most destructive wildland fire in the state of California, and we don’t want to experience this again,” he said. “We have to learn from this so that no one else will have to suffer through such an inferno.”

Drawing lessons from tragedy is never easy, especially when those lessons have been known for years.

“Our problem is a society that is unintentionally, but actively, ignoring opportunities because of the cultural perception of wildfire,” said Jack Cohen, who is retired from the U.S. Forest Service where he worked for 40 years as a fire research scientist.

That perception, he argues, is based on myth and fear and complicated by an ongoing narrative that attributes conflagrations like the Camp Fire to such factors as climate change, overgrown forests and urban encroachment into rural areas.

Each has played a role in perpetuating and prolonging recent fires, but they needn’t be entirely solved to minimize losses. There are steps that can be taken to protect homes and communities, he said, steps that require cooperation and political will.

Demonizing wildfire

The first step, Cohen said, is to address the misinformation about wildland fires.

Over decades, Americans have become disassociated from the reality of fire. Smokey Bear was almost too successful in demonizing wildfire. There is a time and a place and a set of circumstances when fires are beneficial for the landscape.

But video of flames purling up canyon walls and photographs of firefighters standing as heroic silhouettes against a wall of orange flames perpetuate the belief that fire is both scourge and enemy. The reality is more nuanced.

“People see what they believe, and that prevents change to a readily available, effective approach to preventing these disasters,” Cohen said.

The phenomenon in Paradise that Pangburn described — the fire spreading from structure to structure, tree canopies intact — is not unique to the Camp Fire.

Fire behaviorists have documented it throughout the West, most recently in the aftermath of the firestorms that ravaged Northern California last year.

In spite of this, the popular perception is that wildfires burn through these communities like a wall of flames. In fact, small, burning embers — firebrands — blown in advance of the fire are the primary cause of structural fires.

“When we look at the big flames but not the firebrands, we miss the principal igniter and pay attention to the show,” Cohen said.

Billions of these embers fly into neighborhoods, landing onto flammable roofs, into vegetation around the structure and rain gutters choked with leaves and needles.

Big flame fronts, on the other hand, are less effective in igniting structures because they burn fast — often consuming their fuels in about a minute or less in one location — and move along often so quickly as to not consume the structures themselves.

Yet in the face of increasingly severe and deadly wildfires throughout the country, Cohen maintains that it is possible to decrease the vulnerability of urban development in the face of these events.

“Uncontrolled extreme wildfires are inevitable,” he said, “but does that mean these disasters are inevitable? No. We have great opportunities as homeowners to prevent our houses from igniting during wildfires.”

Examining state fire codes

Pangburn’s assessment — that the Camp Fire in Paradise was an urban conflagration, structure to structure — opens the door for fire behaviorists to consider the strengths and weaknesses of the state’s codes for protecting property in fire-prone, rural environments.

The mandate in California, as stated in Public Resources Code Section 4291, is clear: A 100-foot perimeter of “defensible space” must be maintained in “land that is covered with flammable material.”

While the 100-foot requirement is appropriate, it is important to begin thinking closer to the structure itself and work out in concentric circles, Cohen said.

“We have to take care of everything from five feet out,” he said, “so that when it burns, it doesn’t produce enough radiation to ignite the structure or produce enough flames to contact the structure.”

The goal is to distinguish between structure fires and wildland fires and to understand that communities can be separated from wildland fire.

We don’t have to live in ammo bunkers, Cohen said, and we don’t have to entirely eliminate fire from within the perimeter, just ensure that fires that occur within 100 feet don’t burn long enough or intensely enough to ignite other objects.

A defensible perimeter also provides residents with more safety options as fire approaches.

Cohen refers to the story of the medical staff and patients from the hospital in Paradise who took refuge in a home. Climbing on the roof with hoses and clearing pine needles from the rain gutters, they were able to survive.

“A house that doesn’t burn is the best place to be during a wildfire,” he said.

However, the 100-foot requirement in California stops at the property line, which creates a situation where homes can be built beside one another within that perimeter.

If multiple homes share this perimeter, then each home is a potential ignition source, and homeowners cannot create a defensible space beyond their property line if that means trespassing on someone else’s property.

“All it takes is one house to catch on fire, and the heat and embers put the other houses in jeopardy,” Pangburn said.

Cal Fire is responsible for enforcing the requirements of 4291, but trying to inspect every property, spread out over a million acres, is a monumental task, Pangburn said.

Changing the social dynamic

If Paradise and the other communities destroyed by the Camp Fire are to be rebuilt, then the conversation must address the role that neighbors play collectively in protecting themselves and their environment.

The physics of fire won’t change, Cohen said, “but the social dynamic can. It requires cooperation and planning.”

Paradise could not have been saved, but its lessons have the potential for helping other communities when the next inevitable fire starts to burn.

In the aftermath of major urban fires — the conflagrations that destroyed Chicago and San Francisco, a 1973 blaze that destroyed a Boston neighborhood, a 1982 fire that took out four blocks in Anaheim — reforms led to stronger building codes and zoning laws, insurance requirements and advance fire protection systems.

Fire experts, like Cohen and Pangburn, hope that the devastation of the Camp Fire will lead not just to reform but to a greater understanding of what it means to live in a fire-prone, drought-ravaged landscape.

Fire agencies cannot be entirely relied upon to keep fire away from homes or keep homes from igniting.

“The wildlands firefighter’s job is to contain the wildfire,” Cohen said. It’s up to the community to keep itself safe.

Curwen reported from Los Angeles, Serna from Paradise.


©2018 the Los Angeles Times
Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

SEE ALSO: How Trees Survive and Thrive After a Fire


All captions and pull quotes by the editors, not the authors.