BOOKS: Planetary Consciousness and the Tears of the World—A Review of Carolyn Baker’s Collapsing Consciously

 By Gary Corseri

For the corporate whores at Stratfor the destruction of the environment is of no consequence as long as they keep making those big bucks. The epitomize why the corporate way of life has got to go.

Carolyn Baker

Carolyn Baker

One can open this 173-page book just about anywhere, read a few pages, and have something to contemplate and meditate for the rest of the day, or several days, or a lifetime. The book is divided into 2 parts: “Collapse, Transition, the Great Turning” and “Transformative Truths for Turbulent Times.” The first part, about 2/3 of the book, works as a kind of Zen-slap to wake up the disconnected, mesmerized and unfocussed to the terrible predations we have made on Planet Earth these past 200 years of the Industrial Revolution and 100 years of Corporate-Federal Reserve-Media-Military-Academic State-ism. The last 63 pages consist of pertinent, sometimes glittering, quotes from Ms. Baker’s wide and varied reading in Jung and psychology, the Arts, environment and political matters—and her thoughts in response to those quotes and insights. This is a book with “designs” on the reader: the author intends to warn, inform, and transform.

The book’s author-profile states that Dr. Baker is a “former psychotherapist and professor of psychology and history. She is nationally renowned for her writing and workshops on emotional resilience in challenging times…. Her books include Navigating the Coming Chaos: A Handbook for Inner Transition and “Sacred Demise: Walking the Spiritual Path of Industrial Civilization’s Collapse. Her website is SpeakingTruth to Power, at www.carolynbaker.net.”

baker-CollapsingConsciouslyI confess that I have not read Ms. Baker’s previous books, but I have, in recent years, profitably read her articles appearing at some of the best progressive websites as well as her own site. In spite of her obvious erudition, Ms. Baker has a way of “telling it like it is,” without frills–a wise woman talking frankly to those wise enough to listen.

“Our inexorable reality in this moment is one of contraction, decline, and demise. Industrial civilization is collapsing.” Thus, with punches un-pulled, she launches us outward, upward and within from the get-go. There, in the intro, we also learn a little about her recent battles: “As I send this book to publication, I have recently confronted a personal collapse in the form of a health challenge. I have been humbled and constrained by a recurrence of breast cancer. And although my treatment is complete and my prognosis very good… I recognize it as yet another spiritual rite of passage….

Rites of passage, of course, are not easy to navigate… and impossible to circumvent. Fact is humankind in 2014, decades after those prophetic masters’—Orwell’s and Huxley’s—dark premonitions… has succeeded in trumping those foreboding visions. With Ms. Baker’s book and the daily headlines, it’s easy to catalogue the innumerable crises we face: Polar Vortex? What the hell is that? Is there a tie-in with Global Climate Change? What about all this methane gas being released from Siberia’s permafrost melting? What about “Peak Oil”? What about the plume of radiation emanating from the crippled Fukushima nuclear plants? Why hasn’t something been done about the hole in the ozone that I first read about some 30 years ago? When will the endless “peace process” end and we simply have Peace in the Middle East and elsewhere? Are we incapable of transcending our warrior past, our reptilian brain, our genetic, social and historical limitations?

These are some of the questions Ms. Baker would have us examine, and, always, she urges us to know ourselves, to understand deeply. With her background in psychology—especially Jungian–, she exhorts us to know our “Shadow” side—to embrace even the darkness. Collapse consciously! That’s the ticket. There’s hell to pay. We’ve messed up our only home and things will get a lot worse… before they… if they ever get better!

But we can conceive the multitude of challenges we face as a spiritual journey, too.

Let me be clear: this is no namby-pamby “New Age” book where everything turns out honky-dory if only we chant “Om” while the Earth gets fracked beneath our rising kundalini’s. More than once, Ms. Baker enjoins the human race to “grow up!” We are forewarned in the intro: “I am drawn to the perennial wisdom of the towering giants of poetry, story, art, music, and literature. They never have and never will offer us happy stories with happy endings. Rather, they offer us life—in all of its angst, beauty, ire, terror, joy, celebration, ecstasy and demise.” And, again, in her first chapter: “Preparing logistically or emotionally for the collapse of life as we have known it since arriving on this planet is not supposed to be fun.” And, in a later chapter: “Unless we include the possibility of death in our presentation, we aren’t really preparing.” Yes, this is also a book about learning how to die, how to face death.

Like Chris Hedges in Empire of Illusion, Ms. Baker has no patience with our cult of “positive thinking.” I think that cult is a legitimate target of real thinkers (who acknowledge the Shadow), but, occasionally, Ms. Baker over-shoots her mark, conflating all New Agers with Dale Carnegie-type positivists. Of course, “New Age” goes back some 40 years, and is feeling its knees. But much of it was about much more than positive thinking and Ms. Baker knows that in her bones every time she relates a bit of Eastern wisdom, or quotes Lao Tzu or Buddha.

This is a book about becoming whole again; reaching deep within, not to overcome the Shadow, but to integrate and join forces with it. It’s a book about developing a planetary consciousness to confront the global muck we’ve created. It’s a book about making connections—within ourselves, and with others. Ms. Baker quotes Francis Weller, author of Entering the Healing Ground: Grief, Ritual, and the Soul of the World:

“Our sorrow eases the hardened places within us, allowing them to open again and freeing us to once more feel our kinship with the living presence around us. This is deep activism, soul activism that actually encourages us to connect with the tears of the world.”

Gary Corseri has taught in US public schools and prisons, and at US and Japanese universities. His dramas have been produced on Atlanta-PBS; he has performed his work at the Carter Presidential Library; and his prose and poems have appeared at hundreds of publications/websites worldwide, including, The Greanville Post, Redbook, OpEdNews, Village Voice, The New York Times, Smirking Chimp, L.A./Hollywood Progressive, Countercurrents, BraveNewWorld.in. Contact: Gary_Corseri@comcast.net.




NYC must ban carriage horses, but they must sent to sanctuaries.

Stop giving new NYC mayor grief for trying to ban horse-drawn carriages

A horse-drawn carriage is ridden near Central Park on Thursday in New York. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has announced he would like the city council to outlaw the horse-drawn carriages in Manhattan, calling the practice inhumane.(AFP/Getty Images / January 2, 2014)

A horse-drawn carriage is ridden near Central Park on Thursday in New York. New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has announced he would like the city council to outlaw the horse-drawn carriages in Manhattan, calling the practice inhumane.(AFP/Getty Images / January 2, 2014)

By Carla Hall / January 3, 2014, 3:01 p.m.

Bill de Blasio, the new mayor of New York City, has been getting grief for making a priority of banishing horse-drawn carriages from Central Park in Manhattan. It was one of his campaign promises and he announced at a news conference on Monday—two days before he was sworn in—that the city would “get rid of horse carriages, period.”

Let me get this straight: The first week a mayor comes into office, he announces, in no uncertain terms, that he’s going to do something he promised to do and do it right away.  Yeah, that’s outrageous.

I know taking a shot at any new mayor is kind of like trophy hunting, but it’s ridiculous to blast De Blasio on this. Animal welfare advocates have been trying for years to get rid of the horse-drawn carriages. The Humane Society of the U.S. says that carriage horses in New York City live and work in inhumane conditions. According to a 2007 independent audit of the industry by the city comptroller, “the city’s horses are not provided with enough water, risk overheating on hot asphalt, and are forced to stand in their own waste in stables.”

A 2011 editorial in the New York Times presented a different picture, saying that horses are kept in large stalls with hay and water at the ready and don’t work when the outdoor temperature is above 90 degrees or below 18.

Good. Now, let’s treat these horses even better and get them off carriages and the streets altogether. Even if conditions for horses are better than they used to be, this is still an outdated, unsophisticated and unnecessary use of horses for recreation. Less than a month ago, a carriage driver was arrested in New York for animal cruelty after a police officer spotted the driver working an injured horse.

Besides–it’s Manhattan. Do we really think tourists won’t find something else to do? In place of the carriages, De Blasio wants to have electric vintage replica vehicles for tourists to ride, which would also provide jobs for carriage drivers.

And by the way, that’s only part of what De Blasio promised. He also wants to toughen up laws on the sale of puppy mill animals, wants more regulation of pet dealers, and would revamp the city’s municipal shelter system, which definitely needs an overhaul.  (The Los Angeles City Council bans the sale of animals from large-scale breeders—so-called puppy mills—at all pet stores in the city.)

The mayor still has to get this plan through the city council. After that, though, he can probably get the 200 some working horses retired into sanctuaries relatively quickly. The Humane Society of the U.S. and other groups have offered to take them.

Of course, De Blasio has colossal issues in the city to fix.  (Or try to fix.) But I don’t think his announcing that one of the easier problems to solve would get tackled right away means he can’t promptly address poverty, pensions and everything else ailing New York City.




Free-Living Animals on Birth Control

A Macabre and Disneyesque Design

by LEE HALL, COUNTERPUNCH

Deer at Valley Forge by Jeff Houdret
Photo by Jeff Houdret.

Why do we say there “too many” of the other animals? They all seem to balance themselves perfectly well until we intrude. Which we do, everywhere. Our population is seven billion and rising. As we spread ourselves out, we devise the cultural carrying capacity ideaintroduced by the ecologist Garrett Hardin to mean the limit we declare on any animal community perceived as being in our way.

In North America, after we killed most of the wolves because ranchers and hunters didn’t want the predators around, deer achieved a notable ability to thrive in our midst. Yet they are pressed by our incessant construction and road-building into ever smaller and fragmented green places; and so they are described, in many areas, as having a high population density. Government officials, goaded by media representations that alarm the public, advance the conception of deer as a problem requiring a solution.

So officials make plans and draw up budgets that include tens of thousands of dollars for deer eradication, as with the pending plan for the U.S. Department of Agriculture to kill 5000 deer on Long Island. Advocates call it “primitive and ethically indefensible.” They hope the deer can be put on birth control instead. Their online petition says “overwhelming evidence” proves contraception is “effective, humane, less expensive and sustainable over the long term.”

But do we really want a patented, FDA-approved pharmaceutical plan to control other animals? So that we achieve an officially prescribed “density” of the animals in question for any given expanse of space? Is the bio-community that surrounds us something to refashion through some macabre, Disneyesque design?

And it’s not only the highly prolific animals being controlled. Humane Society International, the international arm of the Humane Society of the United States, vaunts its experiments with contraceptives on African elephants as “a new paradigm for elephant management” and garners financial support from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

But the population has dropped to less than a half-million, compared to some 3-5 million African elephants in the 1930s and 1940s. Highly vulnerable populations of long-tusked elephants, such as a genetically unique community of only 230 at KwaZulu-Natal’s Tembe Elephant Park, are being reduced through contraceptive testingperhaps, warns Pretoria wildlife veterinarian Johan Marais, to fade into oblivion.

The Humane Society’s contraception experiments involve ultrasound exams and helicopter chases, with flights close enough to shoot elephants with darting rifles. Yet the group’s report on the project asserts: “Not only has immunocontraception proven to be the least invasive and most humane population control mechanism available to us, it proved to very effective in curbing population growth.”

What is humane about forcibly preventing these elephants’ existence? If elephant habitat is shrinking, isn’t that the real issue to address? And it’s not as though this intrusive activity replaces killing.  The Humane Society maintains that “relocation and/or culling of elephants in confined reserves may continue to be necessary, but contraception will enable management to better control the frequency and extent of such interventions.”

Dissecting Deer

Not only does contraception erase animals by preventing their offspring from existing; the science itself kills.  For researchers at Cornell University and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 21 white-tailed deer were captured, ear-tagged and collared, and kept in a fenced area at an army depot, with some subjected to multiple contraceptive vaccines. In October 2000, all were “humanely killed,” wrote the researchers, “by a shot to the head or neck from a high-powered rifle fired from a blind or a vehicle.”

The bodies were dissected to ascertain the effects of the vaccine known as porcine zona pellucida (PZP), the most commonly used immunocontraceptive for controlling female mammals. This substance, derived from the bodies of pigs, hijacks the deer’s immune system, making it attack the body’s naturally occurring reproductive proteins.

Most of the vaccinated group had lived with pelvic inflammatory disease, and abscesses the researchers called “remarkable”—tubercular in appearance even two years after the injections. The body of Deer Number 188 showed bone marrow fat depletion with “classic signs of malnutrition normally seen in deer struggling through an extremely harsh winter.”

Gary J. Killian and Lowell A. Miller had, just a few years earlier, published the results of six years of experiments at the Deer Research Center of the Pennsylvania State University. Deer subjected to PZP had fewer fawns, but the adults’ bodies changed so that “the average breeding days each year for the control group was 45, whereas in some years some PZP treated does were breeding more than 150 days” of the year. Thus are the social lives of deer—the schedules of their lives—commandeered by the chemical.

The researchers also tried a hormone-based substance. It stopped antler growth on male deer—whose testicles, and sex lives, also failed to develop. The female deer subjected to the hormone also failed to develop sexually.

And on it goes. A study proposal dated August 2013 and intended for implementation in 2014-2019 by Dr. Allen Rutberg at the Tufts- Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine proposes to use bait and drugs, possibly supplemented with drop-netting, to collect up to 60 female deer from Westchester County, New York. The deer will be immobilized, blindfolded and vaccinated in a comparative study of two types of contraceptive boosters, so as to predict the relative costs of using them for deer management.

Dr. Rutberg regularly contributes reports on this research to the Humane Society of the United States. Yet Rutberg’s description of collecting the deer, despite the clinical language, suggests the anticipation of a torment much like what humane groups are expected to prevent:  “Processing after capture in net will include a thorough check for cuts, abrasions, and broken bones as a result of the capture and restraint.”

The Broader View

Meanwhile, the animals that naturally curb the deer population are treated as though their roles in nature don’t count. Eastern coyotes and bobcats, along with the wolves of the West, are persecuted legally and continually. Scientists are also experimenting with the sterilization of coyotes in order to protect the profits of sheep ranchers, and even wolves, low as their numbers are, have been subjected to such experimentation.

While the U.S. government enables ranchers to graze cows on public lands at below-market lease prices, and then “protects” agribusiness or “bolsters” hunting opportunities by killing carnivores such as wolves and coyotes, free-roaming horse populations are annihilated by federal employees on the ranchers’ behalf.

And forced contraception is passing for wild horse protection.  The Annenberg Foundation has assisted the Humane Society of the United States with $1,756,850 in grant money for a project called “Assateague of the West: Protecting Wild Horses Through Immunocontraception.”  The Humane Society introduced PZP to wild horse populations in 1988, assisted by federal park administrators and the Bureau of Land Management.  Under the law, the BLM is to “preserve and maintain a thriving natural ecological balance.”  Yet cattle vastly outnumber the free-roaming horses.  Erasing free-roaming horses supports ranchers’ financial interests, and not the horses’ best interests. Why can’t the Humane Society let the horses and burros be, and put serious work into resisting the commercial exploitation of public lands?

As for the direct physical and social effects of the contraceptives, some studies on horses suggest few drawbacks while others reveal the opposite. Cassandra M.V. Nunez et al. found that contraception with PZP significantly alters the social lives of the horses of Shackleford Banks, North Carolina—enough to destabilize equine group dynamics.  As usual, the researchers called for more research.

The population levels of herbivores, to the extent that they do grow, are a direct result of humankind’s past and present dominion over their natural predators; and biologists have, time after time, found that free-living populations cannot be better managed by humans than nature itself. It’s time to stop mistaking human control for humane treatment.

Lee Hall is a candidate for Vermont Law School’s LL.M. in environmental law (2014). Lee has taught animal law and immigration law, and worked for more than a decade in environmental and animal advocacy.  Follow Lee on Twitter:  @Animal_Law 




Ecology above economics

Рейтинг@Mail.ru

climate-bear-sustainability_2009_climate_change1
By Marcus Eduardo de Oliveira (*), pravda.ru

One of the most urgent and pressing needs in terms of organizing productive society is to reconcile economic development with the promotion of social development and ecological balance, respecting and protecting before anything, the environment , biodiversity and ecosystem services – the base and support of economic activity.
The central notion around that idea is very simple: it is to seek to reconcile economic, social and environmental dimensions. This is the starting point to try to overcome, in the foreground, the dichotomous dilemma taking place in nations that follow the [unexamined compulsion] inherent in the modern policy of [constant] “growth” and the need to “preserve the eco-balance”, in other words,  “prospering” (economically and socially), but “Without destroying” (environmentally).

In essence, we seek to achieve this and meet three basic principles that are referenced in the famous Brundtland Report, also called “Our Common Future”, namely: 1) economic development (immanent aspiration of humanity); 2) environmental protection (care for our common home, Mother Earth, Gaia for the Greeks and Pachamama for the Andean indigenous); and 3) social equity (inclusion of the excluded).

To overcome this dichotomy , there is an obvious question of environmentalism over economic rationality, given that the latter, by lens of neoclassical thought (Traditional) – which in general is the way that many economists think – gives little importance to the consequences (degradation of natural capital) arising from environmental stimulus to intense and frantic economic growth.

By the way, achieving economic growth at any “cost” has become a kind of obsession of conventional macroeconomics, disregarding with that serious disturbances generated in the biosphere, endangering the basis of sustaining life, since, due to the productive economic expansion biophysical limits shall be disregarded. It is the economic activity squandering natural capital.

In this detail, it should be noted that given the important passage in the Global Ecology Manual (1993): “The production of food, energy and industrial articles is strongly related to the deterioration of the system that sustains life on Earth. Between 1950 and 1986, when the population of the world doubled, grain consumption increased 2.6 times, energy use increased by 3.2 times, the effective power economy quadrupled, and the production of manufactured goods grew seven times. ( … )

Currently, humans consume in foods, directly or indirectly, approximately 40% of the total cultivated land in the world. It is exactly this kind of “invasive action” that economic growth cannot continue its “journey” of deterioration of natural resources, greatly squandering the major ecosystems.

To continue promoting the acceleration in productive growth is in practice to substantially increase the loss of biological diversity and the ecosystem. Increasing economic output, among many other possible environmental damages, is also synonymous with further polluting the atmosphere.

About this, it is reiterated that the high levels of pollution and air pollution leave no doubt as to the response that such “expansive economic practice” provides the environment. Nowadays, more than two million people die each year worldwide by “breathing pollution”, small particles staying in lungs (PM10) generated by burning fossil fuels, apart from pollution of ozone (O3). In Latin America and the Caribbean, each year, approximately 35,000 people die due to air pollution; in Europe, the figure is more than 150, 000, and in East Asia, more than 1 million lives are snuffed out for the same reason.

Therefore, the ecological positioning, making it clear that there are restrictive limits and measures for increasing economic production, must be above traditional economic thought, attacking in this way, to the despair of traditional economists, the dogma of economic growth, wrongly seen and defended wrongly as an important factor for enhancing the prosperity of a society.

With an overwhelming pattern of consumption, fueled by consumerist greed 20 % of the world population (1.4 billion people) live in affluent societies, Planet Earth shows signs of complete depletion, indicating that it does not support expansive production.

Not surprisingly, 10% of fertile land on the planet has now turned into desert. Every year 7 million hectares are lost. Put simply, 60% of the principal ecosystem services are deteriorated. It is also not by chance that over the last 50 years there has been a loss of 35% of mangroves, 40% of forests, 50 % of wetlands. Currently, fish stocks are 80% smaller and the cultivated area of ​​the planet covers 25% of the Earth.

Unfortunately, these data show that the economic position lies above the environmental issue. We must reverse it, and soon.

Ecology above economics. 51888.jpeg

(*) Professor of economics. Master in Integration of Latin America (USP).

prof.marcuseduardo@bol.com.br

Translated from the Portuguese version by Olga Santos

 

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Copyright © 1999-2014, «PRAVDA.Ru». When reproducing our materials in whole or in part, hyperlink to PRAVDA.Ru should be made. The opinions and views of the authors do not always coincide with the point of view of PRAVDA.Ru’s editors.




Hunt saboteurs stop wealthy snobs from tearing foxes apart

Ruth Eisenbud, Ecoanimal Correspondent

Behind the fancy attire and rituals, there's only sadism against animals.

Behind the fancy attire and rituals, there’s only cold-blooded sadism against animals.

Editor’s Note:
In Britain fox hunts are often a class issue, with working and middle class youths battling the paid goons of the “master class”, the game wardens and their hirelings, mindlessly serving bloodthirsty snobs and decadents that need to be denounced, opposed at every juncture, and seen for the moral depravity they represent. These self-fashioned aristocrats are not fit to be ruling anyone, and their “elegant” customs, such as fox hunting, speak clearly to the reality of their base instincts. Long live the hunt saboteurs!—PG

Hunt Saboteurs Association News Release 30/12/2013

http://sheffieldsaboteurs.wordpress.com/news/fox-saved/

On Saturday December 28th hunt saboteurs from Yorkshire attended a Pony Club meet of the York & Ainsty South Foxhounds at Escrick Park.
vlcsnap-2013-12-29-21h49m16s121vlcsnap-2013-12-29-22h08m27s73
Three foxes that were deliberately hunted were aided in their escape by the sabs through the course of the day and, as the sun was going down, three terrier men were found just as they were about to finish digging the second fox out of an active badger sett.

The sabs began to obstruct the men from continuing this illegal activity and the situation began to escalate, with about 8-10 more men with spades soon arriving at the scene. One sab was smashed in the head with the pistol the men planned to shoot the fox with and was also knocked down in a field by the men’s pickup truck. The sabs were not deterred by this, fought off the attackers and stood their ground.
vlcsnap-2013-12-29-21h40m09s220vlcsnap-2013-12-29-21h53m08s107
On stopping the dig-out the sabs had to prize a terrier from the fox as it had locked on to the fox’s face. Sabs then had to help the fox free from the earth as the earth around it had been caved in, leaving only its head exposed. The fox escaped with little visable injury, the terrier’s face was badly wounded from fighting the fox.
vlcsnap-2013-12-29-21h59m13s170vlcsnap-2013-12-29-21h47m14s138
The group are now preparing to prosecute the hunt for their actions and ask Escrick Park to stop facilitating these criminal activities. Anyone concerned by the activities of the Y&AS hunt should contact Escrick Park ( http://www.escrick.com/contact-us) to ask that they refuse the hunt access from now on.
vlcsnap-2013-12-29-21h43m36s15vlcsnap-2013-12-29-21h49m05s213
Lee Moon, spokesperson for the Hunt Saboteurs Association, stated: “Only two days after Boxing Day we see the real face of fox hunting. Boxing Day is the sanitized, media friendly press stunt that the hunting community use each year to pull the wool over the eyes of the British public. This is the grim reality of what occurs the rest of the time when the media spotlight is elsewhere. Escrick Park are a major supporter of the York and Ainsty South Hunt and are just as guilty as they allow these illegal acts to take place on their land. We call on them to ban the hunt from their estate before they become embroiled in any legal action taken against the hunt.”