ANTI-CORPORATISM

EDITOR—Marty sits down with Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online to discuss digital censorship, corporate control, prosecution of uncooperative politicians, and more.

EDITOR—Leading Russian geostrategic analyst Dmitry Orlov provides some answers to the question many people are pondering lately: Are NATO’s constant escalations liable to trigger a nuclear war? When will Putin decide that enough is enough and respond in kind? What happens if NATO and its toxic puppet Ukraine score major hits in Moscow and other major Russian cities, or in key defence spots? Orlov suggests that Russia’s way of responding to such dangerous insults may be far less spectacular than blowing up a bunch of Western cities in retaliation (which Russia certainly can do) and far more effective and indirect, attacking, in effect the vital points of the West’s economic organism: electric power, transportation fuels, strategic arms production materials, and so on. 

P. GREANVILLE—We publish the whole uber-ballyhooed debate between the duopoly’s actors, Trump and Harris, whose disgraceful lack of substance is matched by their lack of independent agency and morality, each one trying to outgun the other in imperialist machismo and bloodlust, not to mention complete absence of actual solutions to the problems afflicting the US and the world. These enormous flaws, personal and systemic of the duopoly’s figureheads, are underscored by Jill Stein’s intelligent analysis of the political situation and the sensible requisite policies that will heal a nation tearing itself apart.

BRIAN BERLETIC—AT THE END OF THE DAY, THE US EMPIRE IS SINKING BECAUSE IT WON’T ABANDON CAPITALISM, ITS RAISON D’ETRE.
The US realizes its window of opportunity following the Cold War to assert itself as sole global superpower is closing (if it hasn’t closed already). It seeks to find a way to match or exceed the military capabilities and industrial capacity of both Russia and China through “innovation;” – The US refuses to recognize the fundamental flaws in its own system as well as the premise upon which it seeks primacy in the first place. Start-up companies seeking to out-innovate and/or out-produce China propose unrealistic measures that either won’t work or that China is already employing itself on a much larger scale.

Another instance of shameless pandering to the Zionist lobby. Grotesquely inbalanced statement, massively ahistorical. But who cares? 95% or more of the US public have no idea about the actual history of Israel.