PROTESTS IN USA, LAND OF MARLBORO MAN, WILL COME TO NOTHING, BECAUSE THERE IS NO SOLIDARITY, NO VISION, NOR GUIDING IDEOLOGY TO UNITE THE PEOPLE IN COMMON STRUGGLE AGAINST THE 1%.

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Jeff J. Brown


PROTESTS IN USA, LAND OF MARLBORO MAN WILL COME TO NOTHING, BECAUSE THERE IS NO SOLIDARITY, NO VISION, NOR GUIDING IDEOLOGY TO UNITE THE PEOPLE IN COMMON STRUGGLE AGAINST THE 1%. JUST ASK THE BLACK PANTHERS AND MAO ZEDONG. CHINA RISING RADIO SINOLAND 200608


Sixteen years on the streets, living and working with the people of China, Jeff

Downloadable SoundCloud podcast (also at the bottom of this page), YouTube video, as well as being syndicated on iTunesStitcher Radio, RUvid and Ivoox (links below),


Thanks to my interview with Chairman Fred Hampton, Jr., I’ve been doing a lot of research about the Black Empowerment movement in the United States (https://chinarising.puntopress.com/2020/05/27/chairman-fred-hampton-jr-the-black-panther-pantha-cubs-their-revolution-for-self-determination-to-serve-the-people-and-fight-the-us-governments-ongoing-program-of-domestic-genocide-on-china/). One salient fact is that the Black Panther Party (BPP) is organized and united behind a visionary, guiding ideology, based on socialism, especially Mao Zedong Thought. To wit,

  • Power to the People.
  • Serve the People.
  • Self-Determination for the People.
  • The Black Panther Party is the Revolutionary Vanguard Party of the People.

The Black Panthers admired, respected and were inspired by Mao Zedong (Thought), because it made Marxism-Leninism relevant to (poor) people of color, America’s equivalent of China’s pre-liberation, toiling masses of oppressed peasants. The four-volume Collected Works of Mao Zedong is required reading for all Black Panther members. The Black Panthers sold countless thousands of copies of Mao’s Little Red Book on the streets of America, to finance their self-defense, and later, social programs.

In fact, the Black Panthers beat Richard Nixon to China, traveling there in the fall of 1971, meeting Zhou Enlai (https://archives.stanforddaily.com/1971/10/25?page=3&section=MODSMD_ARTICLE11#article). In the 1930s, Paul Robeson publicly sang China’s eventual national anthem, Qilai (which means Rise Up), to audiences in America. Black Empowerment leader WEB Du Bois traveled to China in 1959 and gave a speech in Beijing, while celebrating his 91st birthday (https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/00/11/05/specials/dubois-china.html). In the 1960s, Robert F. Williams (Black Panther lawyer) and his wife lived there for three years and both he and Du Bois met Chairman Mao (https://radiichina.com/from-w-e-b-du-bois-to-huey-newton-a-history-of-black-americans-in-the-early-prc/).


WEB Du Bois meeting Mao Zedong, when he and his wife visited China in 1959, where he celebrated his 91st birthday and gave a speech in Beijing, saying, “China is flesh of your flesh and blood of your blood. China is colored, and knows to what the colored skin in this modern world subjects its owner… In my own country for nearly a century I have been nothing but a nigger”.


Mao was so impressed with these revolutionary leaders that he published two essays in their support (https://www.marxists.org/subject/china/peking-review/1966/PR1966-33h.htm and https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-9/mswv9_80.htm).

Titles of the two aforementioned Mao essays on the connection between racism, imperialism and capitalism.

With all this Chinese communist-socialist inspiration to work with, it was not hard for the Black Panthers to develop a visionary, guiding ideology. Thus, they rally around their simple, timeless,

Black Panthers:

Ten-Point Program

  1. WE WANT FREEDOM. WE WANT POWER TO DETERMINE THE DESTINY OF OUR BLACK AND OPPRESSED COMMUNITIES.
  2. WE WANT FULL EMPLOYMENT FOR OUR PEOPLE.
  3. WE WANT AN END TO THE ROBBERY BY THE CAPITALISTS OF OUR BLACK AND OPPRESSED COMMUNITIES.
  4. WE WANT DECENT HOUSING, FIT FOR THE SHELTER OF HUMAN BEINGS.
  5. WE WANT DECENT EDUCATION FOR OUR PEOPLE THAT EXPOSES THE TRUE NATURE OF THIS DECADENT AMERICAN SOCIETY. WE WANT EDUCATION THAT TEACHES US OUR TRUE HISTORY AND OUR ROLE IN THE PRESENT-DAY SOCIETY.
  6. WE WANT COMPLETELY FREE HEALTH CARE FOR ALL BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE.
  7. WE WANT AN IMMEDIATE END TO POLICE BRUTALITY AND MURDER OF BLACK PEOPLE, OTHER PEOPLE OF COLOR, ALL OPPRESSED PEOPLE INSIDE THE UNITED STATES.
  8. WE WANT AN IMMEDIATE END TO ALL WARS OF AGGRESSION.
  9. WE WANT FREEDOM FOR ALL BLACK AND OPPRESSED PEOPLE NOW HELD IN U. S. FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, CITY AND MILITARY PRISONS AND JAILS. WE WANT TRIALS BY A JURY OF PEERS FOR All PERSONS CHARGED WITH SO-CALLED CRIMES UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS COUNTRY.
  10. WE WANT LAND, BREAD, HOUSING, EDUCATION, CLOTHING, JUSTICE, PEACE AND PEOPLE’S COMMUNITY CONTROL OF MODERN TECHNOLOGY.

(https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/workers/black-panthers/1966/10/15.htm and here is a PDF poster, suitable for framing BPP_Ten_Point_Program).


Robert F. Williams, a Black Panther lawyer and his wife lived in China for three years, during the 1960s. Here he is meeting Mao Zedong, who is autographing a copy of the Chairman’s “Quotes”.


I don’t know about you, but it sounds like a great plan for ALL Americans, as well as everyone else in Eurangloland. With all due respect to the visionary, revolutionary Black Panther Party, just remove the word “Black” from the list above and presto – the 99% has a manifesto for social justice and, well, socialism.

The ongoing protests engulfing the United States will come to naught, without a unified vision and a guiding ideology, like the ten-point plan above. The closest that this was recently realized was Occupy Wall Street in 2011. There are lots of explanations as to why it failed (https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/the-triumph-of-occupy-wall-street/395408/), but in general, the blame is laid on it being splintered into “a hundred focus groups”, including one of the oligarchs’ great destroyers of hope, identity politics.


Huey P. Newton, co-founder of the Black Panther Party, meeting Premier Zhou Enlai in China, September 1971.


As well, every movement that tries to support the 99% at the expense of the 1% is guaranteed to be infiltrated by the CIA, FBI, ATF, local police and thousands of phony Soros/Omidyar NGOs, or that generation’s ABC soup equivalents. They always work closely with their partners in institutional crime, the Mafia.

These same saboteurs always bring drugs, alcohol and guns to get those involved fucked up in the head and attacking each other. These state actors always stage false flags, creating and financing fake for-and-against groups, using paid protesters, terrorism, violence, vandalism and looting, in order to justify brutal government repression (http://chinarising.puntopress.com/2017/08/26/baba-beijing-is-sick-and-tired-of-the-west-using-hong-kong-to-overthrow-the-cpc-china-rising-radio-sinoland-170821-2/). They bribe, extort and blackmail nonstop. They use psyops to split movements into feuding factions and pit groups versus groups, leaders against leaders (https://chinarising.puntopress.com/2019/07/02/douglas-valentine-on-china-rising-radio-sinoland-the-cia-is-global-capitalisms-secret-gangster-army-190702/).

They of course own and operate the government-corporate mainstream media and using their Big Lie Propaganda Machine (BLPM), destroy the image and reputation of all enemy movements, to brainwash the masses to fear and loathe them, affecting even the people in same said movements. (https://chinarising.puntopress.com/2020/02/14/presstitutes-in-the-pay-of-the-cia-confession-from-the-profession-book-interview-with-john-paul-leonard-and-andrew-schlademan-china-rising-radio-sinoland-200214/). And if all else fails, they assassinate or frame-to-imprison key people to, as the Chinese say, Cut off the snake’s head.

The same thing happened to every Black Empowerment movement, going back to Marcus Garvey and WEB Du Bois, with their Pan Africanism in 1900 (https://www.thoughtco.com/pan-african-leaders-45183). You can even go back starting in the 1880s, with the prairie populist, communist, socialist and labor movements. The same oligarchs’ imperial toolbox has been used for over 100 years to effectively and brutally crush them into non-existence.

WEB Du Bois and Mao Zedong, sharing a light moment in China, 1959.


The Achilles heel for any movement in the United States, which might permanently bring social and economic justice to the 99%, always has been and still is its Marlboro Man ethic. Me-Myself-I-Go-It-Alone is glorified, admired and exalted. Sorry to say, but outside groups like the Black Panthers, 95% of US citizens would not know the meaning of solidarity if it slapped them in the face, which is Us-Ourselves-We-Sacrifice-Together. Solidarity is the heart and soul of communism-socialism, which is why no matter how many tens of billions of dollars Eurangloland burns, how sky high it piles on illegal, genocidal, color revolutions, crimes-against-humanity sanctions, blockades, asset seizures, boycotts, false flags and military threats/attacks, it cannot turn free and independent peoples in China, DPRK, Vietnam, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, and elsewhere into colonial, global capitalist whores. These nations peoples have a common vision, collective purpose and guiding ideology: communism and/or socialism in solidarity and mutual self-sacrifice.

Can Americans overcome this deleterious Marlboro Man defect engrained in their sociocultural DNA? Can they embrace real, meaningful, unifying solidarity? Can they do it while keeping capitalism as their economic system? That is truly the $64,000 question. Russians have probably come closest to succeeding with their anti-imperial, mixed state-private system. Or is socialism the only way to achieve true justice for the US’s long suffering 99%?


Front cover of the Black Panther’s national newspaper, October 1970, honoring DPRK, Vietnam and China for their fight against imperialism, after official visits there (BPP members Eldridge Cleaver and Elaine Brown had visited a year earlier).


My fellow Americans and Europeans, the Black Panthers already have – in solidarity – a visionary, guiding ideology, crystalized into a simple 10-point program, which people of all colors and creeds can embrace. You know the 1% are going to try to subvert, suborn, divide and destroy you and everything you do, so you have to struggle through all that, just like the Chinese, Cubans, Iranians and millions of freedom fighting comrades do around the world every day.

I’ll be watching and reporting from outside the BLPM’s Great Western Firewall (GWF), so stay tuned.

Good luck and dare I say,

Power to the People!

[post-views]

ABOUT JEFF BROWN

Punto Press released China Rising - Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations (2016); and for Badak Merah, Jeff authored China Is Communist, Dammit! – Dawn of the Red Dynasty (2017).
Jeff can be reached at China Rising, jeff@brownlanglois.com, Facebook, Twitter and Wechat/Whatsapp: +86-13823544196.

check this page on his special blog CHINA RISING RADIO SINOLAND

The battle against the Big Lie killing the world will not be won by you just reading this article. It will be won when you pass it on to at least 2 other people, requesting they do the same.

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]f you find China Rising Radio Sinoland's work useful and appreciate its quality, please consider making a donation. Money is spent to pay for Internet costs, maintenance, the upgrade of our computer network, and development of the site.
Just use the donation button below (yes, click on Sylvester the Kitty)—OR, just as easy, SCAN our QR code!





 

 

 

 Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


 



Voices in the fog: The Performative Political BS Has To Stop

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

Shannon Keating, a senior culture editor at Buzzfeed, recently delivered a piece that I find impeccable in terms of fact and logic. Point after irrefutable point, Shannon serves a withering critique of establishment worthies pretending to embrace the struggle of the people.  Disgusted by the blatant hypocrisy, she is saying something that all genuine progressives probably agree with, and that needs to be said.  Obviously Shannon is no dullard. But, after you read her piece (and I hope you do, excerpts below) the question that arises is this: What is a super bright writer like Shannon K. doing by giving editorial respectability to a shameless imperialist disinformation tool like Buzzfeed? Her piece rightly belongs on Black Agenda Report, or here, on this platform (admittedly far less powerful than Buzzfeed ), where there would be no editorial dissonance. And you wonder why confusion reigns. 

Let's make something clear. On Syria alone, to give just one example, Buzzfeed has eagerly run many pieces straight from the State Dept.'s hybrid war playbook.  Like this little gem in March 2018:

The piece, including as illustration the notorious British intel propaganda asset White Helmets as heroes, is one of many items dripping with the sickening cynicism deployed by the empire to put pressure on Damascus and the Russians to stop their bombing, as they struggled to liberate Syria from precisely the bloodthirsty jihadists injected into that nation by the US and its Gulf allies. The US goal in this sordid enterprise was never to liberate Syria from some putative tyranny and human rights abuses (about which the US has never really given a damn, as witness what we did in Vietnam, Central America or Indonesia, for that matter) but to impose a Washington-controlled failed regime a la Libya ready to do America and Israel's bidding. Further, for those who remain stubbornly naive about America's intentions, as other pieces of this ilk, the outcry to halt the bombing "to spare the innocent and the children" is actually designed to give the Washington-backed fanatics a reprieve—yea, those admirable head-chopping "moderate rebels"—so they may regroup and continue indefinitely their brutal mayhem in Syria, which suits the neocons in Washington, London, Paris and Tel Aviv just fine. 

So the question remains, what is a certifiable progressive like Shannon Keating doing in such company? In her righteous lucidity, Shannon reminds us of Caitlin Johnstone, the Aussie firebrand. It's a confusing world, isn't it?
—PG


Excerpts
The Performative Political BS Has To Stop

As Black Lives Matter protests yield results, it’s become harder to ignore the gulf between well-meaning but ultimately worthless gestures and real, radical change.

Posted on June 10, 2020


IDENTITY POLITICS A OUTRANCE: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic lawmakers take a knee and observe a moment of silence on Capitol Hill for George Floyd and other victims of police brutality, June 8. (Brendan Smialowski / Getty Images)

 


On Monday, June 8, a couple dozen congressional Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, attempted to honor the memory of George Floyd by kneeling for 8 minutes and 46 seconds in the Capitol’s Emancipation Hall; they were all wearing stoles of kente cloth. It made for a marvelously cringey spectacle, though an apt one.

All around the country, hundreds of thousands of protesters have risked coronavirus infection and escalating police brutality by taking to the streets, successfully building on decades of abolitionist organizing to dramatically shift the Overton window on the idea of defunding and demilitarizing police departments across the United States. Meanwhile, these lawmakers — as they announced a police reform bill that activists are calling woefully insufficient, and just a few days before Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden proposed spending $300 million to “reinvigorate community policing” — decided to stop short at using African cloth as a political prop to demonstrate their commitment to the cause. 

Identity representation politics and gestures of symbolic support for Black lives (and queer lives, and poor lives) aren’t going to cut it; they never did to begin with. But Democrats are still trying to win their battle against Trump by playing his games.
. Doreen St. Félix, in an essay on the performance for the New Yorker, wrote that she found it “akin to historical images of white political leaders preening in the exotic ‘garb’ of people living in countries they are exploiting. Inadvertently, the cloth emphasized the sense that black Americans are foreign in their own land.”

This well-intentioned stunt, an idea that originated from the Congressional Black Caucus, was appreciated by some of its audience but widely flamed on Twitter as a parody of congressional showmanship and ineptitude — something that could have been dreamed up in the Veep writers room. Ultimately, it reads as just the latest bit of performative absurdity from powerful people who’ve long avoided real accountability for causing or excusing Black suffering.

For many, it is no longer enough for those in power to make mere gestures of solidarity with Black people without also doing the work.

Sometimes — a lot of the time, really — these performances work. For most (white) Americans, or at least those who aren’t activists or organizers or obsessive politicos, it’s often enough for leaders to at least look like they’re doing or saying the right things. Democrats and Republicans alike who find themselves longing for the guidance of presidents past — who still think there’s a world in which we could conceivably “go back to normal” — aren’t so much hungering for better policies, but for better optics. Trump, though he’s finally lost the support of some Republican leaders who say they won’t back his reelection, has nonetheless faithfully (if oafishly) executed much of the Republican agenda, from rollbacks of LGBTQ rights and environmental protections to flooding the courts with conservatives. Meanwhile, the liberals who wish Obama were still in power are banking on the symbolic promise of our first Black president, even though, as Cornel West put it to Anderson Cooper in a recent viral CNN clip, “the Black Lives Matter movement emerged under a Black president and a Black attorney general … and they still couldn’t deliver.

So why all this nostalgia? Why are people like Katie Couric longing for Obama and George W. Bush to jointly address the nation as if the problems we’re facing today — born from systemic racism and unchecked corporate greed — didn’t flourish under both of their tenures? Why has Biden been able to run a successful campaign practically fueled by Obama-era reminiscence? It’s nostalgia not for policy so much as performance — for men who were more “presidential” and respectable than Trump, with his openly racist clownery, and for leaders who knew better than to say the quiet parts out loud.

Identity representation politics and gestures of symbolic support for Black lives (and queer lives, and poor lives) aren’t going to cut it; they never did to begin with. But Democrats are still trying to win their battle against Trump by playing his games. The kente cloth debacle isn’t so different, after all, from the president’s Bible-wielding photo op in front of a DC church — though to their credit, Pelosi and co. didn’t teargas a bunch of peaceful protesters to make it happen.



Puke if you must





[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS


Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.







US Protests: Why the uneasy silence?

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



Puke if you must





[post-views]


[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS


Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.







Tracing the White Supremacist virus

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


EDITED AND HOSTED BY THE GREANVILLE POST


T.P. Wilkinson


 

W. Wilson seated at his White House desk.  By nature a reactionary, he persecuted antiwar people and unleashed the infamous Palmer Raids in  1919 against suspected leftists, especially of foreign origin. The convenient excuse was provided by a rash of misguided anarchist bombings that injured mostly servants of the ruling class.


Woodrow Wilson was the first international mass media politician. A racist academic from South Carolina who was promoted from a Princeton professorship into the POTUS office (at a special showing at the White House in 1913, he endorsed DW Griffith’s KKK-exulting Birth of a Nation as memorable cinema: “It’s like writing history with lighting  My only regret is that it is all so terribly true.”), Wilson's entire presidency was public relations, culminating in the Creel Committee which essentially helped sell the decision by those who had founded the FED in 1913 that they needed US troops to protect Britain and France from defaulting on their war loans.


Adolf Hitler was the second great PR creation. His image was carefully cultivated by the same filmmaking talent that emigrated to the US to promote the Anglo-American Empire after Germany's defeat.

Malcolm X once made a poignant observation about the power of PR, although he did not use the term. He noted that the US regime between 1917 and 1949 changed the US public opinion toward Germany at least 4 times. Yet in all its history it has never persuaded the "white" population to accept that Blacks be treated equally with them. Instead the regime insisted that such attitudes towards Blacks were eternal, human nature as it were. 

As a German citizen I cannot find any praise for the legacy of Adolf Hitler or his friends in the US. In fact, it is quite evident that even if the US did not manage to get AH to Argentina for retirement (I have read reports that the dental records of AH and the dental residue of his supposed charred remains in Berlin do not match) the bulk of the NSDAP and especially the SS legacy was transported to Britain and the US where it thrives to this day.
 
Adolf Hitler, like many others of his generation, was traumatised by the collapse of Austria-Hungary and the refusal of the Allies to merge "little" German-speaking Austria into Germany after the dissolution of the Habsburg empire. The so-called "Anschluss"-- annexation of Austria makes no sense to Anglo-Americans who have no historical-cultural knowledge of Continental Europe. It was a logical demand after Magyar speaking Hungary was given independence along with all the other language communities in the dissolved Habsburg empire. Not unlike the situation created when the West forced the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1990 (through assets Gorbachev and Yeltsin), the end of Austria-Hungary had created a German-speaking diaspora in central Europe. It was in part to this diaspora that the NSDAP appealed. The appeal of AH is often mistakenly attributed to the defeat in 1918 and a general resentment. While this resentment applies to some, e.g. the military, the legitimate source of frustration outside of Germany was the British promotion of ethnic-linguistic nationalism (with Wilson's ignorant, but opportunistic support) in all the crown dominions of Austria-Hungary where German-speakers had been equal subjects of the Habsburg crown and were to be deprived of their status in newly independent countries. Ignorance and mendacity contributed to a general misunderstanding that German demands were a reaction to British duplicity.
Whatever contradictions linguistic and ethnic nationalism may have, it is clear that the Anglo-American Empire (emergent in 1918) had then (as thereafter) used ethnic and language differences to split continental rivals (and to conquer in RoW). However when German nationalists claimed that they too had ethnic-national rights, Britain blocked them wherever possible. Britain had tried this during the French Revolution too-- giving impetus to Napoleon. (As always Albion was trying to prevent the rise of a competing continental power by any means necessary, and we know where THAT led. The US through much of its imperial life has done exactly the same.—Ed).
 
Britain, but ultimately the US, which later absorbed the British Empire, innovated the concept of white supremacy as an ideology for resolving functionally the contradictions and conflicts of confession, nationality, language and ethnicity. The US is not a multi-ethnic country like Austria-Hungary or Russia (Soviet Union) but a state based on white supremacy-- the dissolution of confession, national origin, language and ethnicity in a kind of aqua regis that precipitates "whiteness", disguised as patriotism toward a state that only protects "whiteness". Adolf Hitler's NSDAP tried- unsuccessfully-  to imitate this program with the notion of "Aryan". Both the RNF and the NP in South Africa were really third rate in the sense that they never succeeded in performing this chemical reaction needed to create a solution of "whiteness" like in the US. Australia did not have to work too hard. That small dominion simply adopted "whiteness" from the beginning-- without the need for chemistry.
 
So much for the "good side" of AH.  
 


[post-views]
Dr. T.P. Wilkinson writes, teaches History and English, directs theatre and coaches cricket between the cradles of Heine and Saramago. He is also the author of the book Church Clothes, Land, Mission and the End of Apartheid in South Africa.  Most of his work since 2015 has been posted at Dissident Voice where he also has contributed a poem every Sunday since then. Prior to that pieces were posted at Global Research, Black Agenda Report and while Alexander Cockburn was still alive at Counterpunch.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 

black-horizontal
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]


 




No Compromise, No Retreat: Defeat the War Against the African/Black People in the U.S. and Abroad

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
EDITED AND HOSTED BY THE GREANVILLE POST
by ​​​​​​​ Ajamu Baraka, BAR editor and columnist

 
03 Jun 2020
 

The justice for George Floyd mobilizations today reflected the state’s worst nightmare – a multi-national and multi-racial action initiated by Black people with Black leadership.

A shift must occur away from the focus on individual justice for Floyd back to a critique and opposition to the ongoing structural violence of the system.”

So, we say: Justice for George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, Tamir Rice, Sandra Bland; for our political prisoners; for the super-exploited Black and Brown working class; for oppressed Indigenous nations; and for the millions subjected to U.S. warmongering, sanctions and criminality. We say this to shift the focus from the individualization of this week’s rebellion back to the objective structures of white supremacist, global colonial/capitalist domination. (BAP Newsletter )

The ruling class is befuddled and confused about how to respond to the ongoing street demonstrations sparked by the murder of George Floyd. The mobilizations clearly disrupted their plans for “normalcy” with the forced opening of the economy. The ferocity of the demonstrations that had not been seen since the brief uprising in 92 in response to the Rodney King verdict seems to have caught the authorities completely by surprise. 

In the 1992 street actions in Los Angeles the nation and the world saw the first multi-racial, multi-national street action that was very different from the Black rebellions that rocked the U.S. in the 1960s. The racial configuration of the participants captured the range of non-European national minority communities and migrant peoples from across the Americas’ region. 

“The mobilizations clearly disrupted their plans for “normalcy” with the forced opening of the economy.”

But even in a departure from what occurred in 92, the justice for George Floyd mobilizations today reflected the state’s worst nightmare – a multi-national and multi-racial action of whites, Latinx, LGBTQ, immigrant and migrant workers and Black youth, initiated by Black people with Black leadership. The response from the rulers was predictable but unsurprising in its ideological and strategic coherence to break that emerging coalition of social forces. 

I posted a comment on Facebook in response to what I saw as the counter-moves being made by the state. I was asked by several people to elaborate on those points, which I offer here.  

In my original Facebook post I said: 

No Compromise, No Retreat: Defeat the War Against the African/Black People in the U.S. and Abroad“The enemy knows how to quickly adapt in the ideological struggle: 1) undermine the emerging unity with white agitator propaganda, 2) follow up with declaration against something called Antifa as a terrorist group, 3) instruct the police to join demos and express solidarity, 4) release statements from police chiefs and others pushing the bad apples theme, and most important, 5) keep the focus on the individual and call for "justice" for that individual to avoid attention on the systemic and enduring elements of Black and Brown colonized oppression.”

The white outside agitator trope. If it wasn’t frightening enough to see images of young white kids marching shoulder to shoulder with African and other colonized peoples, seeing white kids actually engaged in militant engagement with police authorities, which went beyond the approved forms of resistance, triggered a cognitive dilemma almost as serious as when they tried to comprehend and explain how China could escape the COVID-19 with five thousand deaths while the virus was killing tens of thousands in the U.S.  

That cognitive dissonance could only be achieved by resurrecting the outside agitator notion that emerged in the 30s and was directed at organizers from the Communist Party and militant union organizers who were working in the U.S. South. But that trope was given its fullest form in the Civil rights struggles in the 50s and 60s. 

It’s redeployment today is geared to 1) delegitimizing Black agency by implying that resistance of this sort had to be directed by white folks, and, 2) generating suspicion and even hostility toward white participants. Granted, issues of counter-productive tactics and police infiltration are real issues. But the state saw a vulnerability in evoking the white agitator trope that the black petit-bourgeois administrators in various cities enthusiastically embraced. 

Antifa as a terrorist group: With the ideological foundation of the white outside agitator, the next step was creating a more understandable target by inventing an organizational form in order to give the threat a more serious and ominous character. The problem should have been, though, that Antifa is not really an organization but an idea with a loose network of some organizations and mostly individuals, many of whom are anarchists with many other political orientations, who believe that the U.S. is facing a neofascist threat that should not be ignored. 

But the fact that Antifa is a mirage is secondary when the objective is to drive an ideological agenda. The success of this, however, is yet to be determined.  

Instruct/encourage police to engage in public relations shunts like taking a knee or even walking with the demonstrators in some locations. Shrinking the distance between the police and the demonstrators is easy when the issue is being framed as “justice” for George Floyd, and by implication the idea that his killers were “bad apples.” 

Those kinds of political stunts are not even inconsistent with a simultaneous display of military prowess and heavy-handed treatment of demonstrators, especially if the idea is taking hold that it is the “bad apples” among the demonstrators that are deserving of policing. 

The bad apple trope plays right into the monumental political error being made by resisters by keeping focus on George Floyd as an individual, even if by extension the critique extends to the police and policing as a whole. The bad apple notion exempts a condemnation of the institution as a whole and diverts attention away from a deeper understanding of the role of the police as the leading edge of the repressive apparatus of the capitalist state. 

Hundreds of Black and Latinix people are dying every day from what the Black is Back Coalition  calls the colonial virus known as COVID-19. Yet because we are not watching grandma take her last breath on the ventilator after having been laying around the hospital for days, her unnecessary death and the literal deaths of thousands of our people did not bring the people out of their houses during lockdown and into the streets. 

Those deaths will continue long after the other cops are charged, and the military secures the cities and people go home, because those deaths are generated by the contradictions of capitalism. They are produced by the structural violence that is inherent in a system that devalues all life but especially the life of non-European workers and the poor. 

So, the state has responded. The challenge for us is how do we counter the state’s attempt to pre-empt the development of a new movement. 

The definition of the “people” is an historic one that emerges out of concrete struggle with specific historical conditions. The deep structural crisis of the system of national and global capital are creating the conditions for neofascism as a capitalist reform strategy. Therefore, we must not allow the state to undermine the basis for building new forms of solidarity among people who are finding their voice.   

“The bad apple notion exempts a condemnation of the institution as a whole and diverts attention away from a deeper understanding of the role of the police.”

And while Trump may be the face of this movement and the public attention fixed on his most bombastic statements and the spectacle of armed citizen groups showing up at various state capitals, he does not have complete power over the real rulers of capital. Trump barely controls the Executive branch and has had his program of radical nationalist economic reform, including gutting Obamacare, curtailed. Instead, he has become an administrator of the neoliberal agenda like the last five presidents before him. 

It is those ruling class forces who fear the masses and will give Trump or even Biden, if he is elected, free reign to continue to jettison the last vestiges of liberal democracy in order to maintain the rule of capital. When it was clear to the Obama Administration that he was not going to be able to co-opt the occupy movement, he moved with decisive action to shut it down across the country. 

Trump will move just as decisively and with same level of ruling class support to shut down the protests when he sees it politically advantageous to do so.   

Two things must happen fairly quickly. On the ideological level, a shift must occur away from the focus on individual justice for Floyd back to a critique and opposition to the ongoing structural violence of the system. It is clear that the state is unwilling and unable to protect the fundamental human rights of the people. The demand for People(s)-centered human rights provides a broad, radical framework for advancing concrete demands that can unite broad sectors of the population.

And secondly, and most importantly, the theme and message around the importance of organization must be aggressively advanced. Mass mobilizations have a place but developing the organizational forms that will build and sustain the power necessary to bring about radical fundamental change is the primary challenge and historic task. 

COMMENTS?

Please join the conversation on Black Agenda Report's Facebook page at http://facebook.com/blackagendareport

Or, you can comment by emailing us at comments@blackagendareport.com

[post-views]

  Ajamu Baraka is the national organizer of the Black Alliance for Peace and was the 2016 candidate for vice president on the Green Party ticket. Baraka serves on the Executive Committee of the U.S. Peace Council and leadership body of the United National Anti-War Coalition (UNAC). He is an editor and contributing columnist for the Black Agenda Report and contributing columnist for Counterpunch. He was recently awarded the US Peace Memorial 2019 Peace Prize and the Serena Shirm award for uncompromised integrity in journalism.   

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 

black-horizontal
[premium_newsticker id="154171"]