Fatima Bhutto: Kamala Harris’s Support for Israel’s Genocide in Gaza Was a Betrayal of True Feminism

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


DEMOCRACY NOW!
Interviews Fatima Bhutto


Resize text-+=

 

Most of these women apparently never heard of the Gaza/Lebanon genocide.


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




The Democrats Deserved to Lose 1,000 Times Over

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



simulpost with


Resize text-+=

The Democrats Deserved to Lose 1,000 Times Over

What happened in this year’s election was not some kind of flowering of American fascism, but a rebellion against a hated, out-of-touch Democratic Party elite.

The primary driver of the election outcome was an angry working-class rejection of the status quo and deep cost-of-living crisis proudly presided over by the Democrats. Traditional Democratic voters who had faced sky-high grocery prices, gas, rent, alongside crumbling social infrastructure were told to buck up and vote for Kamala Harris, or else. They were told to ignore the genocide in Gaza, and worse yet to vote for the genocider. The only thing the Democrats offered to working people was a recycled anti-Trump campaign.

Predictably, the Democrats hemorrhaged working-class support and managed to lose ground in virtually every part of their base: the Arab and Muslim American community, Black voters, Latino voters, young people, and even women.

As the Financial Times reported, “the majority of lower-income households or those earning less than $50,000 a year voted for Trump this election. Conversely, those making over $100,000 voted for Harris, according to exit polls.” Tellingly, this last demographic was the sole one where Harris gained ground: voters who make $100,000 or more voted 42% for Biden in 2020, and 51% for Harris.

Harris abandoned a raft of progressive policies that are wildly popular, some of which were featured on ballot initiatives that won by big margins in states that went for Trump. Voters approved minimum wage increases, including to $15/hour (Alaska and Missouri), expanded workers’ ability to earn paid sick leave in three states (Alaska, Missouri, and Nebraska), rejected school vouchers (Colorado, Kentucky, and Nebraska), and opted to ban anti-union captive audience meetings (Alaska).

The media narrative that Harris lost because working-class voters are moving to the right is false. That’s not to say there weren’t elements of right-wing ideas reflected in the result. Both parties’ disgusting embrace of anti-immigrant ideas has whipped up anti-immigrant sentiment, which was without a doubt reflected in the Trump vote. But fundamentally, it’s the Democratic and Republican Parties that are moving further and further to the right, as they attempt to make working people pay for the long-term crisis of capitalism.

While the vote for Trump was largely against Harris, there are millions who do have a false nostalgia about Trump, with positive illusions that he will bring back lower prices and end the wars.

All such ill-founded hopes will soon come crashing down. Despite his isolationist rhetoric, and his false claims when talking to Arab-American audiences that he would bring peace in the Middle East, Trump is every bit a warmongering representative of the billionaire class as is Harris. Trump is no friend of working people, and he will double down on his past attacks on oppressed groups. In terms of the genocide in Gaza, he will certainly do his best to help Netanyahu “finish the job.”

The Democrats Are Not a Lesser Evil — Nor Are the Republicans

Outrageously, the Democrats are looking to scapegoat working-class voters, telling them they are racist and sexist for not supporting Harris, while themselves undoubtedly preparing to make further overtures toward the erstwhile Republican establishment.

But we should not be surprised because the Democratic Party was never a working-class party. They were always a party of the bosses. They were originally the party of the slave owners, then after that the party of brutal Jim Crow segregation. They carried out vicious attacks on the labor movement, including many times calling in the National Guard to attack striking workers. They have actively supported, or led, every single bloody war of U.S. imperialism, including launching the Vietnam War.

Now they’re responsible for a genocide. Led by Biden-Harrris, the Democrats broke the strike of the railroad workers. They stabbed Bernie Sanders and working people in the back twice, making sure that a candidate with working-class demands would not be allowed to represent the party in the general election. Rather than fight back, Sanders in turn sold us out by backing Biden and then Harris to the hilt.

Then there is the long line of Democratic Party “reformers” who were elected as part of a new left wing of the party, including AOC, who were almost immediately absorbed into the machine rather than doing battle with the party leadership.

Sanders and AOC have spent the last four years shilling for the Democratic Party and gatekeeping working people’s movements. They should not be given an ounce of credibility in their attempt to appoint themselves as leaders of Resistance 2.0 against Trump 2.0. They would take us right back down the dead-end road to the Democratic Party.

In my ten years of elected office in Seattle, as a socialist councilmember, the Democratic Party was at every stage an enemy of our movements. There are no Republicans on the Seattle City Council, so the Democrats alone carry the water for big business. I don’t mean Democrats were sometimes a hindrance. I mean they fought tooth and nail to either block everything we fought for or water it down — from the $15 minimum wage to our Amazon Tax on big business to our renters’ rights bills.

The Democrats are not the lesser evil, they are one of the most powerful capitalist parties in the world.

The Republicans are also in no way shape or form a party of working people, either, and never will be. They are a thoroughly anti-union, pro-war, vicious right wing party, and were so long before Trump.

The problem is systemic — it’s about which class the Democrats and Republicans represent. They represent the capitalists, as do the vast majority of parties around the world under capitalism. And they will continue to do so ruthlessly, regardless of any attempts to reform them. Even if it costs them crucial elections, as it just did the Democrats.

This is the reason why Marx and Engels emphasized in 1850 that the working class must have its own parties and candidates:

Even where there is no prospect of achieving their election the workers must put up their own candidates to preserve their independence, to gauge their own strength and to bring their revolutionary position and party standpoint to public attention. They must not be led astray by the empty phrases of the democrats, who will maintain that the workers’ candidates will split the democratic party and offer the forces of reaction the chance of victory. All such talk means, in the final analysis, that the proletariat is to be swindled. The progress which the proletarian party will make by operating independently in this way is infinitely more important than the disadvantages resulting from the presence of a few reactionaries in the representative body.

No Votes for Genocide!

My organization, Workers Strike Back, endorsed Jill Stein and energetically campaigned for every possible Stein vote, including in the swing states. We didn’t do this because we expected Stein to win, or get 5% of the vote, or because we think the Green Party is the new major party working people need.

We campaigned for Stein as the strongest independent left, antiwar candidate, with the goal of building the antiwar movement and the workers’ movement, of using the campaign to illustrate why working people must completely reject both parties of the bosses, and to then take that momentum beyond the election to begin to build an alternative.

The first major step of our fight was mobilizing the protests at the Democratic National Convention (DNC), where Workers Strike Back organized a rally with Jill Stein’s campaign, Abandon Harris, Revolutionary Blackout Network, and others.

We continued that united front throughout the campaign. In particular, Workers Strike Back focused on the state of Michigan, alongside Abandon Harris, since it has the highest population of Arab American and Muslim voters in the country.

The large vote for Trump in the Arab American community reflects a wider rejection of the Democrats — one born of betrayal. It was particularly sharp because of the unbelievably horrific nature of the genocide in Gaza which Democrats asked voters to forget about. They didn’t.

In the end, Workers Strike Back spent a significant amount of our time in Michigan convincing voters not to vote for Trump and to vote for Stein instead. We were largely successful in this though we were far too small of a force to stop the broader turn toward the Republican Party motivated by the desire to punish Harris. We are also proud of every vote we took away from the genocidal Vice President.

In terms of the argument that the war wasn’t a significant factor in the election, it reflects the determination of the Democrats and liberal corporate media to continue supporting the massacre. While horror over the war was not the singular reason Harris lost, it was no small factor. As The New York Times reported, their internal polling showed that still undecided voters were “six times as likely as other battleground-state voters to be motivated by their views of Israel’s war in Gaza.”

We should be sober about the relatively low result of the Stein campaign, which appears to be on track to win 750,000 votes – around half of Stein’s 2016 total.

Every single one of these votes is important. They represent a courageous stand against the genocide and the two parties of the billionaire class. They are a basis to build on.

But the total vote was much less than the Greens led their supporters to expect.

That lower vote was due to several factors, including the huge pressures of lesser evilism in the race (in which voters were told democracy would end with Trump), the divided left vote (with other left candidates getting over 350,000 votes), and also some of the Greens’ own weaknesses.

The most important factor was the failure of the left and progressive unions to support and campaign for Stein. Had progressive labor leaders like Shawn Fain and organizations like the Democratic Socialists for America (DSA) endorsed and campaigned for Stein, the vote could have been far higher.

Even the parts of the U.S. left that didn’t openly endorse Kamala Harris tied themselves in knots in this election, as they did through most of Biden’s term in office. This desire not to damage the “lesser evil” Democrats allowed the Democrats to run even farther to the right. Some caucuses of DSA, including Reform and Revolution, went so far as to call for a Kamala Harris vote in the swing states. And now these left organizations, including DSA, have thoroughly undermined their authority with working people who want to fight. There has been a recent increase in people joining DSA to get organized to fight Trump, but be warned, DSA’s leadership will be completely ineffective for this task because the organization is now firmly tied to the Democratic Party.

My former organization, Socialist Alternative, while formally saying they supported Jill Stein, did not lift a finger to campaign for her or any other antiwar, pro-worker candidate. Instead, Socialist Alternative stressed again and again how dangerous Trump is, and that it was “correct” to fear him and wrong to punish Harris for supporting genocide. They made it clear they objected to Workers Strike Back campaigning in swing states for Stein. Their position was a word-salad, pseudo-socialist version of lesser evilism. And it is sad to see how far Socialist Alternative is going down this dead-end road.

Socialist Alternative claims to stand for a working-class party, but it’s either naive or disingenuous to suggest that this working-class party could come about without major defeats for the Democratic Party!

These people who say they are for revolution don’t want to upset the status quo and risk alienating themselves from Democratic Party aligned forces. And they seem to have not learned a thing from our decade-long experience in Seattle, where in order to use our socialist city council office to extract countless victories we had to defeat the Democrats again and again.

We Need a New Party for Working People

We urgently need a new party for working people, but that party is not going to fall out of thin air. It will take a ferocious struggle. And those who support it will be viciously attacked, as Jill Stein and her supporters were in this last campaign.

A new party will NOT develop so long as unions and left organizations continue to support the Democrats — we must stand up against lesser evilism in every election.

my speech in Michigan, a clip of which went viral and was watched by four million people.

We are here to ruin things for the Democrats, as we proclaimed during this election, as well as for the Republicans. Throughout their history, the Democrats have ruined things for working people and oppressed people the world over. It is not our job to give them a helping hand, when a section of the working class is outraged at them, it is our job to help bring them down.

Most of all, it is our job to sever the relationship between working people and the Democratic Party. This did happen in a limited way in this election, and it’s a positive step forward. Our challenge is to make that schism between the working class and the Democratic Party permanent. Because the Democrats are and always have been a warmongering party of capitalists.

The other schism that we need to enable and encourage is between the working class and the Republican Party. Because both parties are parties of capitalism. Trump is a dangerous representative of the billionaires, as can be seen in the enthusiastic support of people like Elon Musk, despite the billionaires’ overall preference for Harris as a more reliable and less chaotic servant.

Is this American Fascism?

No, this is not the beginning of a fascist dictatorship.

Trump would of course like to be a dictator, but there is simply not the objective basis for that.

The mass of working people do not support the undermining of democracy. One of Trump’s most unpopular political moves was January 6th, which was strongly opposed by the overwhelming majority of the working class, including most people who vote Republican.

The capitalist class also would not support Trump destroying democratic institutions in the United States. The capitalists see capitalist democracy, which is highly limited and mainly democracy for the billionaires, as the best possible shell for their interests. They know that if those institutions are shattered (as they were under Hitler and Mussolini) it would be a huge danger to the stability of their system and their ability to make profits.

The capitalists have no love of democracy at all, and will support (and have supported) fascism when they felt sufficiently threatened by revolutionary working-class movements, as they did in Germany and Italy in the interwar period of the 20s and 30s. But right now, the capitalist class feels almost no threat at all from the left, which is incredibly weak and divided, as we just saw in the election.

The main problem with this kind of exaggerated rhetoric about “fascism” is that Democrats and their liberal supporters use it, as they did against George W. Bush (whom these same liberals now adore), in such a way as to suppress the independent left vote and to divide the working class and block it from developing independence from the two capitalist parties. We need a movement that will fight against the rich and their two parties, that includes working people who voted for both major parties as well as those, like us, who voted for Jill Stein.

We Will Be The Ones Fighting Trump

I fully recognize that many people are now frightened of what a Trump administration will bring. Trump will attack oppressed groups and the left, as he did last time, and we will have to fight back against that, as we did in the wake of his 2016 victory.

What were the Democrats doing after Trump’s first election? Barack Obama said: “Give Trump a chance.”

We, socialists, were the ones who, under the threat of Trump’s Muslim ban, shut down an international airport, SeaTac Airport, with mass civil disobedience. This was the only US airport fully shut down. Also at SeaTac, the Democrats played no role, other than Democrats like Pramila Jayapal doing a photo op there and leaving. In fact, the Democrats were so unhappy about our movement’s civil disobedience on that night, that they told me so in repeated phone calls as we were protesting at the airport.

When the Supreme Court was preparing to overturn Roe v. Wade and the Democrats had rolled over once again, we, socialists and working people and union members, built protests, and our movement won the first abortion rights sanctuary in the country, in Seattle. This made it illegal for Seattle police to arrest anyone who came to Seattle accused of violating an abortion law in another state. Later that year we also won full funding for all abortion needs for anyone inside the city of Seattle, whether a resident or traveling for that purpose.

What was always incorrect with the “Resistance™“ was seeing the Democratic Party as the vehicle to fight Trump and the right wing. This is an utterly failed and dead-end strategy. During Trump’s first administration, the Democratic Party channeled much of the anger at him back towards passive electoral support for themselves. They discouraged mass movements. Instead, they created a series of nonprofits to suck up the energy and ultimately let off steam without accomplishing anything.

The Democrats won’t protect working people or oppressed groups anymore than they did the last time Trump was elected. They will again prioritize the stability of their capitalist system. Their challenge to Trump during his first term was exclusively through the courts. Why? Because they are more afraid of working-class movements, more afraid of working people as a whole, than they are of Trump.

Building unity around a fighting strategy against the wars and for offensive gains for working people’s collective interests is what is needed. And the basis of our unity cannot be around how someone voted, for Trump or Harris or a third party, but rather if they are prepared to fight with us against the warmongering billionaire agenda of both parties. We cannot succumb to the idea of blaming working people for how they voted. We need to lead the fight forward.

As I said in Seattle at our rally two weeks ago — we will be the ones fighting Trump. Just like we did last time.

In 2016, after Trump was elected, working people, my City Council office, and my fellow socialists organized protests here in Seattle when the Democrats were sitting shell shocked. We organized protests around the country the following day and tens of thousands of people came out.

Next Steps for Our Movements

We need to build protests at Trump’s inauguration, demanding an end to the genocide. Had Harris won, we should have done the same, as I said before the election results came out.

Trump has said he would end the wars — we know he is not antiwar anymore than the Democrats are, and it will be up to mass movements to force an end to all military aid for the massacre in Gaza and the bloodbath in Ukraine.

We cannot follow Bernie Sanders, AOC, or any other self-proclaimed leaders of the “Resistance™” who will try to lead us back into the Democratic Party. We should be prepared that they may hold mass events. We need to be there to explain why working people must reject their bankrupt leadership and fight for an independent path forward.

We desperately need a new antiwar party for working people, but there is currently no force with the resources or authority to launch it in the coming months. We can, however, take steps in that direction by severing our ties with the Democratic Party, and laying down the framework for a working-class party.

What Kind of Party Is Needed

Any candidates we run need to be independent of the two parties of the billionaires. They must run on a clear working-class platform like ending all military support for Israel and demanding a $25 minimum wage [or higher!]. They must use their campaigns to build mass movements for those demands. They should pledge to only accept the average worker’s wage.

They need to use their campaigns, and elected offices if they win, to expose the establishment and disrupt business as usual — you will know they have done so if they are attacked by representatives of the two parties, not embraced or ignored by them.

But we should not look to run dozens or hundreds of candidates — it would be far better if a few ran on a clear working-class basis, rather than many candidates running without accountability to our movements and then selling us out.

Most of all, we need to build a stronger antiwar movement, and a stronger workers’ movement with militant rank-and-file organizing.

The labor movement will have a key role to play in a new party, but first we need a section of progressive unions to break with the Democrats.

It was a positive thing that a number of labor unions passed ceasefire resolutions since the onslaught against Gaza began. But then the leaders of these same unions, including Shawn Fain, endorsed Biden and then Harris. History will judge the leaders who looked the other way and gave their support to candidates arming and funding a genocide.

We will be discussing the concrete steps forward at our upcoming mass organizing conference on February 22nd next year in Seattle. The following day we will hold Workers Strike Back’s first national convention, where we will be discussing and laying out our movement’s plans, as well as democratically electing a new steering committee.

Differences of Strategy in the Presidential Election

There were a number of differences that came up in our fight for every vote for Jill Stein as the strongest antiwar, pro-worker candidate in the election.

Debates in our movement are very important. We need to have them in an open but also respectful way, so as to maintain unity on a principled basis, but to also arrive at the best strategies and to learn from mistakes.

Some of these debates were held openly during the campaign. We disagreed with the Greens and the Stein campaign about telling our supporters that Stein would win or get 5% or other such exaggerations.

We said this would only serve to demoralize people when the election results came out — and that the votes would be “more likely in the hundreds of thousands than in the millions” as I said at our joint rally at the Democratic National Convention.

The Greens disagreed with us when we said we wanted to defeat Kamala Harris for her support for the genocide and her attacks on working people. We made it clear that certainly we would have loved to have defeated Trump as well, but that we were not in a position to do so.

The Greens have for a long time been trying to avoid appearing to be the “spoiler.” But there is no use running away from it, we need to embrace it. We do need to spoil things for the Democratic Party, which pretends to represent working people, as well as the Republican Party and this entire rotten system.

We must take an offensive stand against the Democratic Party. We need to clearly say they don’t deserve our votes, as when I said at a Seattle rally that Harris “deserved to lose 1,000 times over.” We should not be apologizing for our position — the Democrats are not the lesser evil, they are betrayers of the working class, and need to be unmasked.

Another difference came up in the final days of the campaign. We feel it is deeply unfortunate that in the eleventh hour of the election, Jill Stein’s Vice Presidential candidate Butch Ware alienated a substantial section of independent voters with his calling into question abortion rights and the rights of trans athletes. Ware responded to the anger at his comments, but he did not in fact walk back his statements. He mainly said he was misunderstood and that further discussion was needed after the election. In our canvassing and phonebanking we talked to many people who were not only rightly offended by those comments, but had also cast their vote for a different candidate on that basis.

Capitalism is the Root Cause of the Crises We Face

One of the fundamental differences those of us in Revolutionary Workers have with the Green Party and some others in the movement is that we don’t believe capitalism can be reformed. It must be destroyed and replaced with a socialist world, based on solidarity, genuine democracy, and a rationally planned and sustainable socialist economy. If it is not, capitalism will destroy the environment and take human civilization with it.

That means these two American capitalist parties need to be destroyed as well, and that is one of the first orders of business.

Anywhere and everywhere we build genuine working-class campaigns, we need to do so as disturbers of the political peace, not as collaborators within it.

Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




How America Is Losing The Rocket Wars

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


INDRAJIT
indi.ca


Resize text-+=

How America Is Losing The Rocket Wars

The US ambassador to Qatar at a promotion ceremony for Marine security guards. Dunno what it means, but it feels symbolic



Smart missiles have changed war as much as smartphones have changed peace. Today we are used to having packages delivered to our door, and in the same way we get deceased. In this age when bombs deliver themselves, human bombers appear more and more anachronistic. Out of time and out of place. Today, the American military looks like Nokia circa 2010. Technically #1, but technologically beaten.

The American Model


The American model of war is Top Gun. Very expensive aircraft, supported by even more expensive aircraft carriers, dropping very expensive bombs on poor people. Since the 1980s, America bet on stealth, the ability to fuck around and never find out about it. It's fitting that they rebooted the recruitment film Top Gun because they're still using the same tired strategy. America's preferred strategy is still to penetrate deep with a manned aircraft, then release a somewhat smart bomb for the last few kilometers.

The other part of this model is missile defence, what used to be laughed at as 'Star Wars' in my day. Missile defense is the crazy idea of shooting down a missile with another missile, like Robin Hood splitting arrows. The crazy thing is that it actually works (until it doesn't). You can theoretically shoot down any missile, but you can't shoot down every missile. But America never faced that situation so never thought about it. Stealth plus missile defence plus picking on poor people gave America a bloated sense of confidence for decades. Within what passed for strategic thinking in America, the 1990s marked the end of history and the end of military history as well. The US comfortably pre-ordered F-35 stealth fighters until the 2070s. But as the saying goes, pre-orders goeth before the fall.


The Iranian Model


The Iranian model of war, on the other hand, is bottom bullet. As Ayatollah Khamenei said, “Possessing missiles doesn’t solve every problem, but it destroys the greedy fantasy of our enemies.”  Iran has no air force to speak of and no fancy navy. Instead, they shoot missile salvos from (relatively) cheap trucks and disappear underground just as quickly. Iran bet the farm on missiles in the 1980s and now it's borne fruit across the region (they effectively open-sourced the technology). They started from shitty, modified Scuds, but now modern Resistance missiles are higher quality than western models, much cheaper, and produced in much higher quantities. Quantity is its own quality, and Iran's layered attacks (mixing dumb decoys and smart munitions) can flood the best air defense systems around them. That includes all American bases and aircraft carriers in the region, including 'Israel'.

The other part of the Iranian model is tunnels. Iran's missile launchers hide inside tunnels until they're needed. But Iran is no longer weak on the surface either. Iran has sophisticated air defenses and open collaboration with best-in-class Russia. However, the best defense is not being there at all. So after they fire, Iran's missile launchers are just gone. Iran's modern Katuyshas (missile launchers) are basically just trucks, and Iran has built hundreds if not thousands of hardened parking garages underground. These trucks pop-out, fire missiles, and then disappear. Hitting them is literally like hitting whack-a-mole.


The Strategic Conflict

An Iranian Scud missile from the Iran-Iraq War with the following written in both Persian and Arabic, “Death to America, Death to the Soviet Union, Death to Israel, Death to Saddam.”(Islamic Republic News Agency)


Before we get into tactics, understand that there are deep strategic differences that make America's fate a fait accompli.

The standard strategic rule (a rule in the board game Risk) is that defence has an advantage over offense. America somehow cheated this rule for decades by attacking defenseless people, but countries like Iran have grown up. If you look at America's force and matériel projection in the Middle East they are clearly Carbon Crusaders a long way from home, while the so-called terrorists (really terroirists) are of the land and dug in. The Resistance is clearly a defensive system and America is clearly offensive, and the old rule is starting to matter again.

Being a defender gives you natural advantages. Iran can use the terrain and strategic depth to their advantage while America has to hang out in floating parking lots, praying for magic missiles to protect them (from the consequences of their own actions). Iran can fire missiles from solid land, while America has to do it from ships and airships. And Iran has actual friends in the area, while America has only suck-ups with hostile populations.

Being a constant offender also gives America disadvantages. The American military is designed to attack anybody, anywhere, but is not good for any particular battle. America's military is a jack of all trades, master of none. Meanwhile, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corp is built for this battle and battle alone. As they wrote on their first rockets, “Death to America, Death to the Soviet Union, Death to Israel, Death to Saddam.”   Two out of four ain't bad, they're halfway home.

At the same time, America has pressed its disadvantage by being involved in not one, but two land wars in Asia (Ukraine and Palestine), and trying to start another (Taiwan). This has thrown all of its Asian enemies into an alliance, leading to a strategic clusterfuck. Now advanced Russian air defense systems (and likely operators) are in Iran while American supplies are being incinerated on two fronts. These are all huge strategic errors that no amount of last century's recycled tactics can escape from.

The Tactical Results

As you can see, the strategic direction of this battle was set in the 1980s. The tactics are just how it plays out.

On one hand, Iran was obviously ready for the Battle of Al Aqsa Flood. I doubt they knew the exact date of the October 7th ghetto uprising, but they knew this day was coming and were ready for it. The tunnels have been dug for decades, the rockets have been stockpiled, and the whole Axis of Resistance has been talking about it. This is from a hostile source, but you can see the spike in testing of Close-Range Ballistic Missiles (CRMB) up to Space Launch Vehicles (SLV) in 2022. The Al Aqsa Flood was coming, and some people built arks.



On the other hand, America was not ready at all. A week before October 7th, National Insecurity Adviser Jake Sullivan said, “The Middle East region is quieter today than it has been in two decades.” America has an entire class of people like him, who are professionally wrong and only fail upwards. Insomuch as America had a strategic direction in the Middle East, it was leaving. Both Republicans and Democrats wanted to pivot to China, not fight another Gulf War.

Remember that tactics are just the toilet that strategy shits on, and that America was strategically defeated before they started. America has no strategic answer for fighting men in tunnels and never has. All it can do is bomb the helpless (and militarily irrelevant) men, women, and children above. America also has no strategic answer to inundation attacks against air defenses. In response, a former CENTCOM commander has proposed leaving their Persian Gulf basesentirely to avoid Iran's short range missiles, but where would they go? Iran has medium and long-range missiles also. 'Israel' is Al Aqsa Flooded and has lost fire control all over.


Via the Precision Guided Munitions report (ibid)


Again,the entire American tactical model is penetrating deep into enemy airspace and dropping bombs. The distance these bombs can go has increased, but America still has to risk expensive jets to deliver them. As you can see from the Precision Guided Munitions report (above), American jets now have to fly within firing range and, worst of all, park within firing range also. As former CENTCOM commander Frank McKenzie said, “the thousands of short-range missiles that Iran possesses are a factor here. There is no strategic depth. An F-35 is very hard to hit in the air. On the ground it is nothing more than a very expensive and vulnerable chunk of metal sitting in the sun.

This is why 'Israel's' hyped up attack on Iran was aborted after one sortie. They couldn't break Iran's air defenses and had to, instead, fire from outside Iran and do petty sabotage from within. The strategic calculus has completely changed. All that's left for the military industrial complex is accounting fraud.

The Fire Sale Of The Vanities

Genocidin' Joe Biden said show me your budget and I'll show you your priorities. This budget is from the Precision-Guided Munitions: Background (put in one table by me). It's a bit detailed, but it shows the problem.



This report, which stops in 2021, shows that America is strategically oriented towards air bombing with not especially smart bombs. JDAMs (their most numerous munition) are just 'kits' put on dumb bombs. America has no serious ground game at all because they're an invading army, not defending anything at all.

America has made a big show about ground-based systems like ATACMS and HIMARS (launchers) in Ukraine, but HIMARS is a 1990s system and ATACMS are discontinued. What we're witnessing is actually a going out of business sale from the American military, not a resurgence.

The Americans are dumping old junk on Ukraine in an accounting fraud with no hope of winning at all. For themselves, America has replaced ATACMS with PrSM, which is also a non-killing joke. Those missiles cost $1,666 million apiece, and they produced 30 of them in 2021. As of 2024, production is up to 54 missiles a year. What are we even talking about?


Department Of War, 2024 Budget Request, via me


Looking at America's supplies, it's no great surprise the type of violence they sow. Their entire military model since World War II has been firebombing cities, from Dresden to Tokyo to entire regions like Southeast Asia and the Middle East. In Gaza and Lebanon they've just slapped new tails on the same bombs (JDAMs) to commit fresh massacres. These fighter jets still have to be quite close to the targets and can't travel very far without refueling. The Americans are also wasting these munitions (and what's left of their reputation) bombing hospitals and refugee camps with no military value. America is winning the genocide and losing the war. All of their vaunted military spending is really a measure of corruption and fraud, not force projection at all.

The Rocket Wars

America has simply missed the boat on a sea change in warfare. While Russia can now beat them in peer warfare, even much poorer adversaries can beat them by firing rockets and hiding underground, a complete 'disruption', in consumer tech terms. Smart rockets have advanced at the same pace as smartphones, whereas jets look like a Nokia with too many buttons. This is the state of America's military, and the giant ship is too big to turn around, even as the Al Aqsa Flood rises around them.

What we're witnessing now, on multiple fronts, is actually a going out of business sale of the military industrial multiplex, with mass murder as mass marketing. What we're witnessing is a fire sale of the vanities, from Ukraine to Palestine. America's reign is ending in strategic defeat, on multiple fronts. Like the Nazis they assimilated into NATO, America will continue fighting and killing after the cause is lost, but the strategic direction of these battles was already set decades ago, and the tactical results have already been proven. This is war in the age of rockets, and America has already been strategically defeated.


 


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




What is the true result of the American Presidential Election?

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Peter Man
Opeds


Resize text-+=

Peter Man, a product of Chinese culture, has a cosmopolitan mind that easily blends the best of classical thinking. Call him, therefore, a Pythagorean Cynic. Accordingly, this mordant piece is not so much "against" Trump as it is against American credulity, a trait of American civilisation that has opened the door to enormous tragedies. (Peter Man is definitely NOT a Democrat cultist, nor, for that matter, a liberal totalitarian). I should note, though, that while Trump is a crook, he is no more of a crook than the rest of the US political class, whose ranks contain, in huge numbers, every form of moral vice and human criminality known to our species, albeit they are yet to be the target of politically-instigated judicial and media persecutions. That dubious honour is still reserved for the Orange Man.


What is the true result of the American Presidential Election?

With everyone discussing the consequences of a Trump presidency, I would like to add my two cents' worth, naturally based on my abnormal logic.

First and foremost, Trump did not win the election. Surprised? You shouldn't be. Trump was handed the presidency on a silver platter by the Democrats. It's very different, although the result is the same. Didn't I say Trump should beat Kamala hands down? If someone who doesn't even follow American politics can see, why didn't the Democrats?

What's my reasoning? The presidential election depends on winning over non-committed voters in a few swing states. Kamala and the Democratic Party have nothing to offer to these voters other than lip service and bullshit, promising democracy and freedom for people needing to put food on the table. I figured if a very progressive person such as myself would rather die than vote for these genocidal hypocrites, what was the chance they could convince fence-sitters in the swing states? Hence, Trump should win hands down, and he did. Quod Erat Demonstrandum.

Some liberal-minded people, so-called global leftists, and perhaps a few progressives seem to be okay with a Trump presidency because Trump may be better than Kamala. No, he's not. I made it quite clear in my Idiot's Guide to Voting. In the following video, the usually perspicacious Daniel Dumbrill (Canadian making craft beers in Shenzhen) outlines the condition, "As long as he (Trump) isn't derailed by pro-war Neocons on his team, that might become a net positive ..." O the horror! Even Dumbrill? How about "... political figures in Japan came out to say that if Trump won, Japan might finally need to and will be able to take control of their own foreign policy..." It's all blather and balderdash until Japan kicks out all the US soldiers and bases. C'mon, Dumbrill, where is your common sense? And the last straw, "I think it's unlikely for Trump to turn into a full pro-war Neocon even if he surrounds himself with some unfortunate characters. But even if he does, it would be hard to recover from him telling the whole world the way it really is ... the only thing to do from here now is to cross our fingers and wait and see where he takes us." My God! Dumbrill has lost his mind pinning his hopes on Trump. Has he been consuming too much craft beer? How did he lose his political mojo?



Luckily, we have Brian Berletic (Ex-US Marine living in Thailand and editor of The New Atlas) to remind people who have been mesmerized by Trump, the relentless lying machine, that he is no peacemaker. Here is Berlectic's latest video: The Trump Administration, from "No war hawks" to all war hawks.



I'll make it simple for those who don't have time to contemplate. 

1. The people of America have elected a convicted criminal to be their president. He also has the subservience of both Congress and the Senate. He has made the Supreme Court overwhelmingly Republican and will add to it.  He will soon flood the Federal courts with loyal Republican judges and government departments with Republican employees. Every institution of power, such as the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the DEA, the Pentagon and the Justice Department, will be at his beck and call. A lawless criminal will reign supreme with complete impunity in America. Which part of this do we not understand? 

2. Trump tells incessant lies. He told over thirty thousand lies publicly during his last term, about twenty-one per day on average. This does not include his private lies. Why would you trust anything he says?

3. Trump does not keep his word. He deserves no trust. If you have to make a deal with him, make sure it's short-term and you get paid upfront. If he makes a promise, make sure he keeps it before you do your part. 

4. Biden, Kamala and the Democratic Party promise to cede power peacefully. In truth, they are meekly surrendering to the criminal in chief and ceding power for good, meaning forever. If I were as lawless as Trump and wielded such supreme power with impunity, I would spend much of the following years consolidating dynastic power, ensuring Trumpian succession for the foreseeable future. 

5. All the vassal states will now cower and grovel in front of Trump. He may not be able to threaten China or Russia. But America's so-called allies will crawl in the dust before the mighty Hegemon and do his bidding without hesitation, including self-immolation. Japan wants to have their own foreign policy? I still can't believe the words coming out of Dumbrill's mouth, even though he was repeating someone else's rubbish.

6. Lai Ching-te to test China. He will give the DPP the green light to prosecute and imprison TPP (party leader Ko Wen-je already imprisoned) and KMT lawmakers in a reign of terror. Will China react angrily and issue more toothless protests? Or will they make the nation whole again swiftly and bloodlessly at the time of their choosing (hopefully before being forced to act)?

7. Everything Trump does will hasten the fall of the empire, but he will be more concerned about consolidating his power in America. A hot war, especially a losing one, will scupper his plans. He will try to avoid it. Trump is not hard to understand. He is as predictable as gravity. His presidency will be a train wreck for America and its vassals. The rest of the world, who are not vassals, can humour him and let him bloviate about how great a deal-maker he is. Let him delude himself and America. In the meantime, pull the Dollar rug from under him and watch him flounder trying to deal with the financial crisis. The House of Cards will collapse slowly and then all at once. 


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Peter Man was born and brought up in colonial Hong Kong. For his entire primary and secondary education, he attended La Salle Primary School and La Salle College, a prestigious English boys school run by Catholic Brothers. After graduating with an engineering degree from McMaster University in Canada, he became a pioneer of Chinese language television programming in his adopted country, establishing Canada’s first national Chinese language television station. He later lived in China for two decades working in the broadcast and telecommunications technologies industry. During that period, he witnessed the country’s meteoric rise. Since retiring recently, he has decided to share his life experience by writing blogs, and he has written a science fiction novel “The Unconquered” which takes the reader across the entire history of China. 

Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.

RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Go Not Abroad to Arm and Defend Monsters

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


DANIEL LARISON


Resize text-+=

Go Not Abroad to Arm and Defend Monsters

The Biden administration confirmed that it would do absolutely nothing while the Israeli government starves and ethnically cleanses north Gaza:

Washington last month told Israel to take “urgent and sustained actions” to improve the catastrophic conditions in the Palestinian enclave within 30 days and warned that if it did not, US military aid to Israel could be at risk.

However, after secretary of state Antony Blinken was briefed on Monday by Israeli minister of strategic affairs Ron Dermer on how his government had improved conditions in Gaza, the Biden administration decided that no further action was needed.

The U.S. has enabled the slaughter and starvation in Gaza for more than thirteen months. Conservative estimates from medical workers that have served in Gaza put the overall death toll at nearly 119,000, and that number will have risen significantly in the weeks since then. We have seen the same pattern repeat for all that time: the Israeli government commits grievous crimes against the Palestinian civilian population, the administration tut-tuts and asks that Netanyahu and his allies be slightly less sadistic, the Israeli government blows through whatever lines the administration has drawn, and then the U.S. shrugs and takes their word for it that they are improving. The Biden administration will never find Israel in violation of any law because they do not want to withhold the weapons that the Israeli military uses to commit war crimes. The “deadline” that the administration set was meaningless, and when it came and went humanitarian aid groups said that things had become much worse in the intervening weeks:

However, in a report published as the US deadline expired on Tuesday, eight aid groups, including Oxfam, Save the Children, Anera and the Norwegian Refugee Council, said Israel had not met “any of the specific criteria” set out by the US last month.

“Israel not only failed to meet the US criteria that would indicate support to the humanitarian response, but concurrently took actions that dramatically worsened the situation on the ground, particularly in northern Gaza,” the report said.

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) called Biden’s inaction in the face of the Palestinians’ suffering “shameful” and “weak,” but it is even worse than that. Biden has not only failed to put pressure on Israel to end the slaughter and starvation, but he has gone out of his way to ensure that it can continue. He has repeatedly rushed weapons and U.S. military personnel to protect the perpetrators of these crimes, and he has brought the U.S. closer to direct conflict with Iran to shield a government of war criminals and genocidaires. Biden is guilty of shameful dereliction, yes, but he is also an active participant and accomplice to one of the great crimes of the century.

This week a U.N. report concluded that the Israeli government’s actions were “consistent with the characteristics of genocide” and Human Rights Watch reported that the Israeli government’s forced displacement of civilians in Gaza amounts to ethnic cleansing. This is from the HRW summary:

According to the United Nations, 1.9 million people were displaced in Gaza as of October 2024 out of a population of 2.2 million people. This report examines the Israeli authorities’ conduct which has led to this extraordinarily high level of displacement and finds these actions amount to forced displacement. Given the evidence strongly indicates that multiple acts of forced displacement were carried out with intent, it amounts to war crimes. The report further finds that the Israeli government’s acts of forced displacement are widespread and systematic. Statements by senior officials with command responsibility show that forced displacement is intentional and forms part of Israeli state policy and therefore amount to a crime against humanity. Israel’s actions appear to also meet the definition of ethnic cleansing.

The Biden administration keeps sticking its head in the sand and pretending that none of this is happening. Secretary Blinken absurdly claimed that Israel had met 12 of the 15 steps that they had called for, but the aid groups have shown that this isn’t true. Whatever the Israeli government may have said it was doing to improve conditions, it has been lying to the administration and once again the administration prefers those lies to the mountain of evidence that shows deliberate starvation and ethnic cleansing.

The U.S. is obliged under its own laws to halt all weapons transfers to Israel immediately. It is clearly in the interests of the United States to disentangle ourselves from a client government committing war crimes and genocide. Cutting off weapons to Israel also happens to be what most Americans support. Ending U.S. support for these wars is legally required, prudent, and popular, so it takes a truly deranged and ideological administration to refuse to do it.

There is a broader lesson for U.S. foreign policy in all of this. Two hundred years ago, John Quincy Adams famously told Americans that our country “goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy.” At the time, there was a danger that the U.S. might think that it should act like a “knight-errant” to defend likeminded causes in other parts of the world. Adams was right that the U.S. shouldn’t ensnare itself in distant conflicts on behalf of liberty, so imagine how disgusted he would be if he saw his country becoming ensared in foreign conflicts to defend oppression, massacre, and man-made famine?

In addition to not going in search of monsters to destroy, America should not go abroad to arm and defend monsters. Our government has done that with the Saudis and the UAE when it backed their war on Yemen, and it is doing it again in backing Israel’s wars in Gaza and Lebanon. That has to stop, and we need to have an overhaul of our foreign policy so that it will never happen again.


By Daniel Larison · Hundreds of paid subscribers • A daily blog on foreign policy and international affairs by Daniel Larison
ABOUT D. LARISON
Ph.D. in History from The University of Chicago. Contributor, to Responsible Statecraft


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS