John Pilger’s Brave Exposé of the Dirty War on the NHS—(Must read / Must Watch!)

Another important dispatch from The Greanville Post. Be sure to share it widely.


Pilger's message is constant vigilance. When socialist islands float in a capitalist ocean, their future is always uncertain. The people must remain on guard against the inevitable attacks that will eventually materialize, under numerous excuses, as malicious capitalist dynamics never stop, and the corruption of the political class is a given. Americans fighting for Medicare for All should take special note. —PG


Addendum: Discussion

John Pilger: Private healthcare is only there to make a profit | Going Underground

Going Underground speaks to legendary journalist and filmmaker John Pilger about his film ‘The Dirty War on the NHS.’ He discusses the issue of the film not being allowed to air during the general election, and questions the role of OFCOM as a regulator. He also speaks about the negative impact of management consultants, how the Health and Social Care Act of 2012 opened the door to NHS privatization, how privatization causes money to be wasted in the NHS despite more funding promises, and the reality of the private healthcare system in the US. Pilger also discusses RAM volunteering in America, the 2019 UK general election, the reason why Brexit has been taken over by the extreme right since 2016, anti-Semitism allegations against Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party, allegations of BBC bias against Labour in the election, and more!


Film Review
The Dirty War on the National Health Service: John Pilger documentary “goes to the heart of the struggle for democracy today”

Originally published on 10 December 2019

Written and directed by John Pilger

The Dirty War on the National Health Service, written and directed by the BAFTA and Emmy award-winning journalist and film director John Pilger, has opened in several UK cities. The screenings, some accompanied by question-and-answer sessions with the director, have been sold out.

The film will reach a far wider audience on ITV, but it will only be aired after the election on December 17, because of the political sensitivity of the issue, following a ruling by the television regulatory authority Ofcom.


Director John Pilger interviewed on RT.com




Pilger’s work is a passionate appeal to working people to oppose the decades-long, covert assault on the National Health Service (NHS) by all three major parties. Even for this writer, whose professional work was bound up with exposing the secret privatisation and balkanization of the NHS, the film proved deeply shocking.

Pilger introduced The Dirty War saying that he had wanted to make it for some time, even though he had already made a couple of films about the NHS. He noted that the war on the NHS had been going on a long time but was at a crucial stage now. The NHS, said Pilger, has become a major issue in the election precisely because it “represents democracy.”

But what was at stake was more than “just” the dismantling by the corporate vultures of a system that was, in principle at least, a comprehensive (from the cradle to the grave) and universal service, free at the point of use. Pilger explains in the film that “Britain’s deadly disease was class. The NHS was not given from on high but won in struggle. It exemplifies what is good in British society. NHS is a deeply democratic institution. The leaflet announcing the NHS to the British people and given to everyone said, ‘Open to all, rich and poor.’”

“But” he said, “the corporations hate the NHS. They and the politicians are carrying out a war against it. We have to fight for it. We should have done so earlier because it touches all our lives. It is the great connector between all of us.

“If the NHS goes, everything else will go.”

Pilger had had to turn to crowdfunding to finance the film. He acknowledges in the credits all the people who had donated.

This is the leaflet that announced the new National Health Service to the British people. It was delivered to every household in May, 1948 and announced that a free health service 'open to all, rich and poor', would begin on 5th July.


The Dirty War opens with scenes shot in the US of “patient dumping,” by which patients, discharged from hospital in the middle of the night—one was severely disabled, another had had open heart surgery just nine days earlier—are thrown onto the streets or into some refuge without so much as informing the care workers, much less asking for their consent. It is nothing short of barbaric. This was in order to make way for new patients and additional income.

Switching to Britain, a homeless charity says this is happening here as hospitals need a rapid turnover of patients in order to make a profit.

Pilger shows that the creeping privatisation of the NHS in Britain meant an early death for a worker when a private ambulance came with a non-functioning defibrillator and was unable to contact anyone at the company’s call centre to obtain another. In another case, in which the NHS had subcontracted a surgical procedure to a private hospital, the patient had to be blue lighted [rushed by ambulance] to an NHS hospital because, when things go wrong, the private hospital has no back-up facilities. The writer-director points out that the system designed to give us all “Freedom from Fear” has been attacked by every political party on behalf of big business.

Privatisation by stealth began in the 1980s under Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who commissioned a report from McKinsey’s, the consultants, that led to the creation of the “internal market” in 1991. In 1988, Conservative MPs Oliver Letwin and John Redwood had proposed a switch to an insurance-based system, in a pamphlet titled, “Britain’s Biggest Enterprise: ideas for radical reform of the NHS.”

But it was Tony Blair’s Labour government that set it all in motion with the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), whereby the private sector built, owned and operated hospitals, using private finance. So expensive were these new hospitals, despite being considerably smaller than the ones they replaced, that many other hospitals were closed, and land was sold to pay for them. Despite this, the commissioning trusts were soon in financial distress. Since they could not be allowed to fail, the non-PFI trusts were sacrificed to bail out the PFI hospitals.

Tamasin Cave, Director of Spinwatch, and John Pilger, filmed on a tour of the offices of pro-NHS privatisation think-tanks and lobbyists that surround the Houses of Parliament


After 2010, the “reforms” speeded up. David Cameron’s Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition escalated the privatisation process, introducing the disastrous 2012 Health and Social Care Act, removing the duty of the Health Secretary to “provide” health care for the population and “freeing up providers to innovate”—that is, opening the door to private healthcare companies and management consultants.

The Dirty War shows privatisation continuing under the Conservative government of Boris Johnson, with Matthew Hancock, the current health secretary, waxing lyrical about a smartphone self-diagnosis app called Babylon: no doubt a mechanism for eliminating whole swathes of GPs and nurses. A Babylon spokesperson has the gall to tell Pilger its diagnoses are “100 percent safe, but not all of the time.”

There is a revolving door between government, public officials and the private health care sector. Alan Milburn, Labour’s Secretary of State for Health, on leaving government in 2013, became chair of PricewaterhouseCoopers’s UK Health Industry Oversight Board, whose purpose is to engineer the privatisation of the NHS, and help PwC increase its share of the “health market.” He also joined the private equity firm Bridgepoint Capital, whose activities include financing private health care companies providing services to the NHS, including Care UK.

In a sign of the NHS’s intended trajectory, its current head is Simon Stevens, who spent 10 years as a senior executive at UnitedHealth Group in the US, becoming CEO of UnitedHealthcare’s $30 billion Medicare business.

Pilger makes clear that the dirty war on the NHS is aimed at giving free rein to the corporate sector, who cannot wait to get their hands on the service’s £120 billion a year funding, with author and Spinwatch campaigner Tamasin Cave describing the NHS as a “£120 billion opportunity” for the powerful healthcare corporations. It will mean a healthcare system that will deliver profits, not treatment and care for those who need it.

The writer-director illustrates this graphically, pointing to what happened at the privatised Hinchingbrooke Hospital, which in 2012 was put in “special measures” and eventually returned to the NHS after just three years of a supposed 10-year contract.


Bevan was a genuine working class leader.

 

In a very moving scene, one of the senior nurses, who had worked for 24 years in the hospital before being sacked by the private company running it, explains that putting profit before patients changes the relationship between the clinical staff and their patients. It means cutting costs, working long, unsafe hours, closing down hospital and GP services, increased waiting times and not addressing patients’ clinical, social and personal needs.

She is not alone. Doctors, nurses, academics and campaigners all warn Pilger about the risks involved in the NHS becoming a “two-tier” system, with the free NHS providing only a minimal service.

Now, with Johnson seeking Brexit-related trade discussions with the US that include plans to “sell out” the NHS as part of any deal, there is the added danger that the NHS will replicate the disastrous US system, where some 87 million people either have no healthcare insurance or healthcare insurance that demands unaffordable co-payments.

According to a leaked transcript of the US-UK discussions, a Department of International Trade official reassured a US trade representative, writing, “Wouldn’t want to discuss particular health care entities at this time,” and, “you’ll be aware of certain statements saying we need to protect our needs; this would be something to discuss further down the line.”

So, although the Johnson government has publicly pledged that the NHS is not “on the table” in any post-Brexit trade deal with the Trump administration, selling it off “would be something to discuss” later.

Pilger says that no one in the Conservative government responded to his request for an interview. There is a short clip of Labour’s Shadow Secretary of State for Health, Jon Ashworth, making the bald—and unconvincing—claim that a Labour government will end the privatisation of the NHS.

The Dirty War on the NHS ends with a scene that drew gasps from the audience: a visit to a US free healthcare initiative known as a Remote Area Medical (RAM), run by volunteer clinical staff in Wise, Virginia, a small town in the Appalachian Mountains where there are no healthcare facilities.


It's sunrise at the county fairground in Wise Virginia, where Remote Area Medical has set up its clinics - offering free treatment. People wait for days, sleeping in their cars, then are given a number at sunrise. Here, they wait for their number to be called out.


RAM provides pop-up medical clinics delivering free dental, vision and medical care to those without healthcare insurance. Stan Brock, a Londoner, originally established it in the 1980s to treat people in the developing world, but latterly treated those in need of health care in the US.

Dental chairs are laid out in the county fairground in Wise, Virginia, as Remote Area Medical sets up its free clinics, treating people with no hope of affording medical care outside.


The message was unmistakable. This is the future in Britain if the dirty warriors have their way and the NHS becomes an insurance-based system.

This deeply moving film should be seen by everyone. It not only provides the most convincing case for socialized healthcare. It points to the better world that would be made under a system where the goods and services so essential to humanity are produced based on social need, not profit, and made available to all.


Jean Shaoul writes for wsws.org, a US-based Marxian publication. 
 

Closing words






Structural Violence, Marginalized Communities and Radical Change

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


EDITED AND HOSTED BY THE GREANVILLE POST

by Gary Olson
"...the culpability for structural violence lies with those
who support the system giving rise to it."


In most societies today endemic poverty is indeed a form of structural violence maintained by a system of profoundly unequal social relations. (Getty Images)


A recent analysis by Harvard geneticist Stephen Elledge tabulated the number of years that Americans who died from COVID-19 might have lived had they reached a typical life expectancy. The shocking answer is that the coronavirus  has claimed more than 2.5 million years of potential life in the United States since 2020. And despite making up only one-fifth of the total recorded deaths from COVID-19, people under age 65 accounted for 1.2 million of potential years lost. A follow-up study now underway using race and ethnicity will very likely show young Black and Latinos having lost substantially more years than younger white Americans. [1]. 
 
Setting aside the pandemic for the moment, we can extrapolate that a similar type of analysis could be undertaken to calculate the number of years of life lost for Americans who die prematurely from the normal, everyday functioning of capitalism in this country.  Those consequences can be classified under what Norwegian politician scientist Johan Galtung termed “structural violence.”  [2]  Looked at this way, structural violence is “the increased rates of death and disability suffered by those who occupy the bottom rungs of society.” [3]
 
Violence is usually thought of as damage to or loss of life from avoidable and external causes and direct violence takes the form of acts perpetrated against specific individuals. One can identity the victims, agents, intentions and means of direct violence.  In contrast, ‘’Whenever persons are harmed, maimed or killed by poverty and unjust  social, political and economic institutions, systems or structures, we speak of structural violence.  Structural violence, unlike armed violence, can have two effects — it either kills its victims or harms them in various ways short of killing. [4] 
 
Put succinctly, when the global society or a national society’s means of survival, from jobs, food and medical assistance are concentrated in the upper class, the majority of the population has a life expectancy lower than necessary. [5]  And for what follows, it’s important to stress that structural violence lacks a visible person committing an intentional act of excessive violence to whom responsibility may  be assigned. Rather, it results from the underlying unequal distribution of power and resources.  
 
Structural violence measures the gap between the actual and the potential, that is, a society without the national repressive structures. When such measurements have been taken on a global scale, the results are staggering in that the number of fatalities from structural violence were found to be seventeen times greater than from direct civil and international violence and cause ten times more than homicides, suicides and warfare combined. [6] And if commonly accepted estimates by the World Health Organization and other sources  are correct, between now and 2030, 56 million children under the age of 5 will die from poverty and wholly treatable causes. Their fundamental right to live out their lives will be violated.
 
Structural violence, according to Harvard public health expert Paul Farmer, is a “broad rubric that includes a host of of offenses against human dignity...ranging from racism to gender inequality...[to] extreme and relative poverty.”  It advances not unlike an invisible virus that lays waste to a patient’s immune system by means of political-economic processes.[7]  Although less visible, structural violence is by far the most lethal and widespread form of violence that would not occur within a more equitable society. Therefore, it’s one of the most critical areas of violence studies meriting further investigation in our time. [8]
 
Because health, gender, economic and racial disparities are affixed deep within society’s structure itself, they tend to go unnoticed  and normalized as just among the routine problems of life. The underlying inequality accounting for marginalized people’s susceptibility to infection, illness and premature death is virtually invisible, lending the conveniently false impression that irresponsible personal behavior is the culprit. The upshot here is that “economically driven processes and forces conspire to restrain individual agency. Structural violence is visited upon those whose social status denies them access to scientific and social progress.” [9] That is, an important distinction is that overt/behavioral violence like police executions of Black citizens, ICE locking children in cages or the conscious restricting of the economy to immiserate workers is easy to discern and episodic. Structural violence is steady,  insidious, covert and exponentially far exceeds the visible form.
"Put succinctly, when the global society or a national society’s means of survival, from jobs, food and medical assistance are concentrated in the upper class, the majority of the population has a life expectancy lower than necessary..."
Structural violence permeates U.S. society. It’s inherent in the country’s governance and major sectors of the population have suffered under neoliberalism with its celebration of rugged individualism, inequality and the free market. Identifying and publicizing its gruesome consequences would make it obvious that structural violence could be mitigated by a different allocation of national resources. Indeed, an Economic Law of Life is operating here under which the the amount of structural violence, including life expectancy is, to a high degree, a function of the country’s wealth and income distribution. Wealth buys life.  
 
Put another way and writing specifically about the United States today, economist Richard Wolff maintains that “Pandemic capitalism distributes death in an inverse proportion to wealth and income... so that unequal income distribution finances unequal “natural” outcomes.” Wolff continues that when private profit trumps public health, “a half million of us die, sort of like a “natural” car accident. [10] Clarifying this would allow what is now normal to be totally loathsome. Most important, it all materializes from the “normal” textbook operation of liberal democracy and the market system. The complicity of the duopoly that enables structural violence to continue unchallenged would also be exposed for its illegitimacy. 
 
U.S. officials talk about incremental change and celebrate nonviolence but this conceals massive structural violence and a status quo of silent suffering and peacefully secure cemeteries.  That is, untold millions of years of life expectancy are being lost each year in the United States  because of the economic injustice of the capitalist system. However, as Farmer explains, these ideas “provoke discomfort in a moral economy still geared to pinning praise or blame on individual actors.” [10]. As such, people cannot absolve themselves with righteous proclamation like “I have never and would never engage in or support violent behavior toward another human being,” because the culpability for structural violence lies with those who support the system giving rise to it. 
 
One way to approach this is to measure  the general population’s potential life expectancy in the United States versus its actual life expectancy owing to factors such as economic deprivation, access to health care, denial of  opportunities, institutional racism and marginalization. Going further, the critical breakdown would include  examining the qualitative  effects of structural violence on marginalized communities in the United States. [11].  A team of activist academics, led by Prof. Rakhshanda Saleem and a team committed to furthering social justice, has undertaken just such a much needed research project. [12]
 
The project’s initial  focus is on multiple groups with marginalized identities and it highlights the intersectionality of their experience with structural violence. Not everyone will agree and there are different variables at work,  but given the bleak future of young millennials, I would add them to the usual mix of racial, ethnic and other categories. They are unanticipated victims of structural violence but may not even see themselves in this way. However, there’s an undeniable and logical connection between how normal neoliberal capitalism operates and the structural violence in which millions of millennials are insnared. 
 
Although his capitulation ultimately tore out their hearts, roughly 10 million beleaguered and bitter Millennials embraced Bernie Sanders  because they realized they were being shafted by the Lords of Capital.[13]  Today, they could  declare, “It’s not the pandemic, stupid!  It’s the pandemic under economic inequality.”  In sum, what is so exciting about this research  is that an “intersectional perspective that promotes solidarity across struggles needs to be advocated” and the groundwork now exists.
 
Finally, beyond the episodic public protests against egregious acts of overt violence, there is a largely invisible, insidious, and relentless class war taking place. Below the 1-2 percent who own the nation’s wealth, including 705 billionaires with more wealth than the bottom half of the population are the 17-20 percent who administer the system and are richly rewarded for their role. Below them, we find the 80 percent, the working class that actually produces all of society’s good and services. A close analysis of structural violence can serve to heighten awareness of the advantages of the disparate groups in the third category who are victimized, subordinated and played off against one another by the  same enemy, to join in a struggle against a system that’s destroying their common welfare.


[1] Katherine Wu, “The Coronavirus Has Claimed 2.5 million Years of Potential Life in the United States, Study Finds,” The New York Times, October 21, 2020.
 
[2] Johan Galtung, “Violence, Peace and Peace Research,” Journal of Peace Research, 6, no. 3, (1969), pp.167-91.
 
{3] James Gillian, Violence: Reflections on a National Epidemic. (New York: First Vintage Books, 1997). 
 
[4] Gernot Kohler and Norman Alcock, “An Empirical Table of Structural Violence, Journal of Peace Research, 13, no.4 (
 
[5]Tord Hoivik, “The Demography of Structural Violence, Journal of Peace Reserch 14, No.1 (1977), p.60.
 
 
Http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/violence/en/.Manu 2017.
 
Http://dou.org/11.100297811192407ch7.
 
[9] Richard Wolff, The Sickness in the System (New York: Democracy at Work, 2020) Pp.117,129.
 
[10] Paul Farmer, “An Anthology of Structural Violence,” Current Anthropology, 2004,45 (3).
 
ir.library.Illinoisstate.edu/sta5.
 
Https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/jppp/vol8/iss1/10; See, also Saleem,R, Pagan-Ortiz, M.E. Merrill, Z, Brody, M & Andrade L (2020) “I thought it would be different”: Experiencing of Structural Violence in the Lives of Undocumented Latinas. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology,26 (2),171-180. Https://doi.org.1037/pac0000420.
 
[13] Gary Olson, “Youth and the Looming Economic Crisis,” Counterpunch, May 1, 2020.
 
Gary Olson is Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA. He can be reached at: olsong@moravian.edu. (Thanks to Kathleen Kelly, my in-house public health expert)


[post-views]

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 

black-horizontal


[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]


 




Lee Camp exposes Wisconsin’s bribery of Foxconn: Giant fraud of late-stage capitalism

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Help us break the corporate media monopoly before it kills us all.

~314~ The Giant Fraud of Late-Stage Capitalism

Late-stage capitalism gives us fraud & misery like when Wisconsin offered mega-corporation Foxconn billions in tax breaks to pretend they’d bring jobs to the state.


Plus: Bonus feature

MOC #8 - The Four Layers Of Reality


[premium_newsticker id="211406"]



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


PLEASE COMMENT ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP OR IN THE OPINION WINDOW BELOW.
All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors.

black-horizontal

 

black-horizontal




The Billionaires’ Duopoly Wins on Tuesday

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


EDITED AND HOSTED BY THE GREANVILLE POST


29 Oct 2020
 

One of many BLM protest rallies across America, this one in Boston. The multiracial composition has shaken up the ruling elites, but the movement has by now been largely co-opted. (Boston Herald)


 

Allegiance to the Democratic half of the duopoly – whether active or passive – is still allegiance to corporate rule, not a strategy for transformative change.

The Republicans busy themselves emboldening racists, while the Democrats crush the left.”

For the second presidential election cycle in a row, the corporate Democrats face their ideal opponent -- a racist so brazen and personally repulsive that Blacks and progressives abandon their own historic agendas to make common cause with mass incarcerators, war mongers and job-destroying oligarchs. The formula failed to keep the White House “blue” in 2016, due primarily to the corporate Democrats’ refusal to prevent or punish the Republicans’ massive -- and totally successful -- suppression of Black votes (See Greg Palast .) Although Hillary Clinton was personally humiliated by Donald Trump’s Electoral College victory, her “big tent” strategy succeeded in pulling most of the ruling oligarchy, corporate media, and National Security State firmly into the Democratic camp. This year, by hook and crook, and with Trump as the terrifying Strawman-in-Chief, the corporate Democrats were once again enabled to crush Bernie Sanders, a challenger whose positions on core issues matched those of 70 to 85 percent of the Party’s base.

From the Lords of Capitals’ standpoint, Clinton’s “big tent” strategy has been a huge success. The only potential threats to Big Capital’s continued control of the national agenda emanates, not from Trump -- who gifted the ruling class with its wish-list of tax breaks, Supreme Court justices and capital deregulation without effective resistance from corporate Democrats -- but from the blue party’s electoral base, which has been totally eviscerated as a “resistance” to anything but Trump, and from the Black-led street movement, whose most high profile personalities became Democratic Party players during the Trump years. Even the 20 million-plus George Floyd protests of last June can be viewed largely as an anti-Trump phenomena that will not likely be replicated under a Democratic regime – despite the fact that most highly publicized police murders of Blacks (like this week’s 10-bullet shooting of a mentally-challenged man in Philadelphia)  occur in Democrat-led cities. 

Organized labor pretends the Democrats are a labor party, although it’s run by men like Bezos and Bloomberg, while a big chunk of their white members feel free to vote their race.

“Even the 20 million-plus George Floyd protests of last June can be viewed largely as an anti-Trump phenomena.”

The phony U.S. Left – judged by where they stand, not how they talk – swears they will “confront” a Joe Biden/Kamala Harris regime once the Orange Menace is swept into the dustbin. Bernie Sanders, the national health care advocate who slinked back into the corporate bosom of the Party at the very moment when Covid-19 was proving beyond doubt that the United State has no national health structure, vows to move “forward with an agenda that speaks to the needs of the working people of our country” when Trump is safely gone from the White House. But $50 billionaire Michael Bloomberg, acting on behalf of his fellow super-oligarchs, is now the Financier-in-Chief of the Democrats and, with Nancy Pelosi’s able assistance, will ensure that the Party remains a cemetery for progressive movements. 

After November 3, the Green Party will cease to be an alternative in more states, thanks mainly to Democratic machines that have made it impossible for Greens to remain on the ballot. The cutting edge of the dictatorship of capital is Democratic. The Republicans busy themselves emboldening racists, while the Democrats crush the left.  The young activists of the Movement for a Peoples Party , most of them former Bernie Sanders enthusiasts, can expect the same treatment if they attempt to escape the duopoly’s shackles.

The Democrats have always been equal partners in U.S. imperial wars, but under the Clinton-Biden “big tent” are now indisputably the more aggressive warmongers, chomping at the bit to contain and punish the Russians and Chinese and all nations that hesitate to join in the global offensive begun by Barack Obama in 2011, with his attack on Libya, and then Syria, and then the coup in Ukraine and the “pivot” against China. 

“The Democrats are now indisputably the more aggressive warmongers.”

With Democrats leading the charge, domestic opposition to U.S. imperialism is now equated with treason. Only weeks after the 2016 election, oligarch Jeff Bezos’ Washington Post put Black Agenda Report and twelve other left publications on a blacklist of “dupes” of Russia. The old McCarthyism has become Clintonism, Obamaism, Pelosism, and now Bidenism. (See “Fascism with a Democratic Party Face,” BAR, November 30, 2016,)

The political weakness of the Black street movement is most evident in the behavior of the Congressional Black Caucus, which has voted overwhelmingly to continue the militarization of local police (2014) and to make cops a “protected class,” assaults against whom are now a “hate crime” (2018). The Black Lives Matter movement has not altered the anti-Black, pro-police, pro-mass Black incarceration political behavior of the men and women that represent Black America in Congress, because BLM has failed to target Black Democratic politicians, even when they act en masse against Black interests. Black lives are apparently less important than Black faces in high Democratic places, who need only wear kente cloth on occasion to ward off the young Black legions. The spear is blunted.

Allegiance to the Democratic half of the duopoly – whether active or passive – is still allegiance to corporate rule, not a strategy for transformative change. Both Malcolm X and MLK rejected such a stance. 

“BLM has failed to target Black Democratic politicians, even when they act en mass against Black interests.”

A great sigh of relief will be heard across the land if Trump is ousted in November (or December or January, whenever the dust settles). The Democrats will treat an electoral victory as an endorsement of their policy of never-ending war and austerity (Race to the Bottom), and proof that Joe the Incarcerator and his Black prosecutor sidekick have been vindicated in their life-long predation against Black and poor people.

Since the first year of Obama’s presidency, the Black Is Back Coalition for Social Justice, Peace and Reparations has marched on the White House to signal its permanent opposition to the rule of rich white men, no matter the complexion of the family in the White House, and eternal commitment to the principle of self-determination of all peoples, including Black people in the United States. In terms of relationships of power, there will be no change of regime as of result of the vote on November 3, and therefore no reason not to mount a “Black People’s March on the White House ” on November 7.

Power to the People! Dismantle the Duopoly!

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com .

COMMENTS? 

Please join the conversation on Black Agenda Report's Facebook page at http://facebook.com/blackagendareport

Or, you can comment by emailing us at comments@blackagendareport.com

 

 


[post-views]Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 

black-horizontal


[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]


 




It’s Futile…. We’re FEUDAL!!

BE SURE TO PASS THESE ARTICLES TO FRIENDS AND KIN. A LOT DEPENDS ON THIS. DO YOUR PART.


Philip Farruggio OpEds

THIS IS A REPOST


6000 times that of their average worker.  If the economy crashes those FAT CATS can live off of their savings and bonuses for years... while YOU start selling apples on street corners!

Fact is that only 3% of our populace ( 11.8 million) are mega millionaire households, which does NOT take into account the worth of their primary property AKA residences, which factor into the mega $ millions in many instances. On the other end of the scale, by the first quarter of 2019, way before this pandemic hit, 5.2 million properties ( AKA residences) had underwater mortgages. So, the pandemic arrived and Uncle Sam got the mortgage holders to defer those monthly payments owed, under a moratorium of what, one year. Duh, do you understand that when this thing finally lifts a bit, the homeowners will be expected to ante up and wipe away that indebted slate? OK, how is that going to occur when many working stiffs are nothing more than mere Serfs? That is why this writer always says " It's the Empire.. stupid!"

Amerikan corporate capitalism has always been unfair. My dad was a longshoreman during the 50s, 60s and into the 70s. When I was a kid, and we were living under a ' One Paycheck ' household ( until my mom was forced to get a job to keep us afloat) I recall the many strikes my dad's ILA ( International Longshoremen's Union) was involved in. The right wing Congress, with help from many Democrats ( sound familiar?) passed the Taft Hartley Act of 1947, which cancelled out two FDR New Deal pro labor acts, The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 ( AKA The Wagner Act) and the Federal Anti Injunction Act of 1932. Here are some of the terrible parts of Taft Hartley:

  • It allows the president to appoint a board of inquiry to investigate union disputes when he believes a strike would endanger      national health or safety, and obtain an 80-day injunction to stop the continuation of a strike.
  • It declares all closed shops illegal.
  • It permits union shops only after a majority of the employees vote for them.
  • It forbids jurisdictional strikes and secondary boycotts.
  • It ends the check-off system whereby the employer collects union dues.  

So, each time his contract expired, my dad went on strike. The president then issued the Taft Hartley ' 80 day cooling off period' ( nice way to use PR to make the public think the unions were the children who needed ' Cooling off AKA Detention'). This was a great way for the ' Captains of Corporate Capitalism ' to put a strain on the millions of striking working stiffs now out of work with no pay. My dad wound up driving a taxicab or limo for the interim, earning way LESS than his normal pay. We had to cut back on certain costly foods and other expenses like new clothes, going to the movies or bowling with friends, and of course NO vacation until....  

Today we have less than 10% of private sector working stiffs in unions at all. Thanks to the public sector unions, who are also under assault, with only around 37% of their working stiffs belonging, there still may be a scant glimmer of hope. If our working stiffs do not finally realize that only strong unions can stand up to the FAT CAT empire, then feudalism will strangle us all! Forget about the Democrats as our saviors. Look what the Democrats just did in the House, where they are the majority. They joined with the other right wing party, the FAR RIGHT Repugnantins, and voted down a ' too small' amendment to cut military spending by a mere 10%. Imagine that! This writer joined with many progressives, Socialists and Libertarians a few years ago demanding a 25% cut in military spending, sending the savings back to the states, cities and towns where those taxes were collected from. My small city of 60,000 would see a rebate of around 70+ million dollars each year. Yet, most of the serfs who live nearby me just don't get it! They are too propagandized by this empire's media spin machine to understand how we are all being played.... to our detriment.  

In conclusion, the Great Depression of the 1930s, as terrible as it was, still saw more working stiffs waking up from their slumber. We had a myriad of newspapers, newsletters and radio shows trumpeting real progressive ideas and ideals. Today, we have only some websites that speak ' Truth to Power' , and that is all. The Two Party/One Party current apparatus is owned by the Super Rich. Thus, we had a Trump vs. Hillary fiasco in '16 and now a Trump vs. Biden joke as well. So, voting will once again be futile, except for the fact that Trump is SO LETHAL for us working stiffs, that even  a Biden presidency, terrible as it may be, will be welcomed for the short term. If that isn't an indication of the Futile Feudalism we are knee deep in....

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Philip A Farruggio is a contributing editor for The Greanville Post. He is also frequently posted on Global Research, Nation of Change, World News Trust and Off Guardian sites. He is the son and grandson of Brooklyn NYC longshoremen and a graduate of Brooklyn College, class of 1974. Since the 2000 election debacle Philip has written over 300 columns on the Military Industrial Empire and other facets of life in an upside down America. He is also host of the ' It's the Empire... Stupid ' radio show, co produced by Chuck Gregory. Philip can be reached at paf1222@bellsouth.net.

 

The Russian Peace Threat examines Russophobia, American Exceptionalism and other urgent topics

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

PLEASE COMMENT ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP OR IN THE OPINION WINDOW BELOW.
All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors. 

[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]