The Successful Cultural Revolution (Part 1)

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. BREAKING THE EMPIRE'S DISINFORMATION MACHINE IS UP TO YOU.


 

Mark Twain.


Godfree Roberts

Earlier, I claimed that Mao did more good and less harm than anyone in history and, in an essay on the ‘great famine,’ we saw how he saved millions from death by starvation, despite the US grain embargo. This two-part essay focuses on Mao’s last decade and on his Cultural Revolution, which taught everyone to read, write, argue and vote and ended Mark Twains’ ‘deaths from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty and heartbreak’ for five hundred million forgotten people.

Birth of a Revolution

1 nobles during the French Revolution and still celebrate the occasion annually. Yet though the Chinese killed no elite 2 (they were all back in office by 1975) during the Cultural Revolution, they nevertheless achieved their goals and staged the first top-down, peaceful revolution in history and the only successful one of the 1960s.

Mao Zedong.

In 1957, eight years after the revolution ended, Mao warned colleagues that mere socialist transformation would not end China’s social contradictions: “There are people who seem to think that, as state power has been won, they can sleep soundly, unworried, and play the tyrant at will. But the masses will oppose such persons, throw stones at them and beat them with their hoes, which will, I think, serve them right and please me immensely. Moreover, sometimes fighting is the only way to solve a problem. The people have good reason to remove bureaucrats from office.. I say it is fine to remove them, they ought to be removed, the Communist Party needs to learn a lesson. If students and workers take to the streets you comrades should regard it as a good thing.. Workers should be allowed to strike and the masses to hold demonstrations. Processions and demonstrations are provided for in our Constitution and, when the Constitution is revised, I suggest the freedom to strike be added so that the workers are explicitly permitted to strike”.

André Malraux. “Victory is the mother of all illusions.. Humanity left to its own devices does not necessarily re-establish capitalism, but it does re-establish inequality. The forces tending towards the creation of a new class are powerful”.

The danger

The greatest danger, he said, was a political leadership that turned its back on socialism, bourgeois elements who produced a new bureaucratic class that he attributed to China’s Stalinist bureaucratic hierarchy, a new exploiting class fashioned from a ‘bourgeois bureaucratic class sucking the workers’ blood’.

He reminded colleagues of ‘peasant rebellions, when frustrations burst forth in emotional storms in which hatreds, resentments and a sense of hopeless desperation break through social restraints in an overwhelming surge’.

But no-one listened, nothing changed so he concluded that the problem was cultural: the ancient tradition of privileged officials and submissive, deferential peasants was to blame and this status quo needed changing–a job for which Mao was uniquely qualified.

Robert Payne, who knew him, explained in 1948, “Mao holds all the arts of China in his hands. Lenin had neither the learning nor the inclination to assume the role of transformer of culture. Mao, far more widely read and with a comparative subtlety of mind, has clearly determined to accept the position thrust on him and no one can foresee the changes in the basic structure of Chinese culture which will derive ultimately from his will.”

Guilty Secret

Chungwu Kung,

China was a people’s democratic dictatorship in theory only; in practice, political and cultural power was held by scholarly and bureaucratic intellectuals who commanded vast influence and prestige.

The Revolution had changed little beyond ownership of farmers’ tiny plots, which in any case remained subject to the vicissitudes of weather and fortune.

Luan time

Mao proposed giving five hundred million peasants education, democracy, justice and dignity. He would direct their frustration ‘outward, through the force of ideology expressed in a political slogan, breaking the shackles of repression through study and converting their thought into creative action’. Then one Spring morning in 1966 he became the only national leader in history to overthrow his own government when he told startled colleagues, “I firmly believe that a few months of chaos, luan, will be mostly for the good”.


A discussion rally.


Since the Party controlled the means of production and everyone owned their land, he said, violence would be unnecessary. He proposed an exclusively cultural revolution and encouraged students to stir things up and Shanghai university students founded the Red Guard movement in response. After a few months of chaos, Mao met with Red Guard leaders and told them factional conflicts had to stop. “The masses don’t like civil wars.. The people are unhappy, the workers are unhappy, the peasants are unhappy. The Beijing residents are unhappy, the students in most schools are unhappy.”

Maurice Meisner, “The old bureaucracy, in a desperate effort to save itself, expended its last financial resources bribing workers into political passivity, appeasing them and buying time for political maneuvering”. The Central Intelligence Agency reported⁠:

While it would be too much to say that the cultural revolution has followed a precise master plan–there have been too many tactical adjustments and shifts along the way–it is clear that Mao envisaged two distinct phases from the start: destructive and constructive.

The Red Guards were Mao’s vanguard during the destructive phase but proved to be a woefully defective instrument during the constructive phase. Mao’s disillusionment with the Red Guards became apparent after their dismal, self-seeking performance during the initial ‘power-seizures’ of early 1967 and was intensified by their indiscriminate internecine warfare during the following summer. Time and again, Mao ordered the young students to rectify themselves voluntarily. They did not do so, thereby confirming in Mao’s mind his assessment of the negative qualities of China’s intellectuals.

As early as 1939, Mao had written that the sole criterion by which to judge whether or not a youth is revolutionary is if he is ‘willing to integrate himself with the broad masses of workers and peasants and does so in practice’. The Red Guards had not been willing to do so. Thus, Mao replaced them with a new vanguard–the working class–when he decided that the time had come to start building and consolidating his new revolutionary order, and he forcibly dispatched the young intellectuals [China’s current president and prime minister among them] to rural areas by the hundreds of thousands for further ‘revolutionary purification’”.

After reading posters denouncing his parents, Yang Xiguang, son of a senior cadre, sought sympathy from his family’s housekeeper. The woman, who had behaved submissively towards them for many years, told him that she completely approved of their downfall, said her submission had been feigned, that Yang’s parents had exploited her all along, and that the city’s housekeepers were organizing their own rebel group. “I felt my world turned upside down. Lots of common people had smiled at me before the Cultural Revolution for being the son of a big shot but I now felt it had only been pretense.. I suddenly recognized the keenness of the contradiction, that those at the bottom actually hated those at the top”.

A Program of Revolutionary Rebellion

Social discontent – rooted in workers’ material lives – was real. Workers’ productivity had increased by 250% since 1957 and the cost of living had increased by 10% but their incomes were 5% lower. Their protests about wages, benefits and work conditions expressed a yearning for human dignity and democratic control over socioeconomic life. One temporary worker recalled, “We were simply inferior. In the factory, if people didn’t know your name, they would just call you linshi gong [temporary worker], which sounded contemptuous. Therefore the word linshi gong was a taboo among us. We would rather call one another lin xiong or ‘temporary brothers’”.

A Program of Revolutionary Rebellion, by the Mao Zedong Thought Association of Hundreds of Millions of Peasants in Dong’an (in rural Hunan, Mao’s ancestral home) complained about heavy tax burdens and excessive labor levies and listed their demands

  • Peasants must enjoy genuine political and economic freedom.

  • Their rights should not be violated, and illegal and abusive practices, such as tying up, beating, denunciation, and deception, must be abolished.

  • Peasants should receive the same political treatment as workers, cadres, and technical professionals.

  • As long as peasants have done a good job in collective production, their income derived from sideline production (such as cultivating private plots, raising pigs, chickens, and ducks, and embroidery) should not be vilified as capitalist.

  • Peasants who become ill must be covered by the public health-care system in the same way in which cadres and state workers are. No matter how seriously ill a state worker becomes, all possible means will be tried to bring him back, and all expenses will be covered by the government. When a peasant gets seriously ill, however, if the treatment would cost several hundred yuan, then the patient’s fate would be to wait for death. The peasants’ well-being enjoys no guarantee. Such a system is patently unjust.

  • A nationwide movement that would “lessen burdens of the peasants, enhance their economic and political status, thoroughly lift them out of poverty, . . . overthrow the unjust social system, turn an inverted history on its own head, and struggle for the complete victory of hundreds of millions of peasants.

In the Country

With the youngsters now back in the classroom or sent down to a farm, Mao placed his faith in his own class. “The peasants are clear-sighted. Who is bad and who is not, who is the worst and who is not quite so vicious, who deserves severe punishment and who deserves to be let off lightly: the peasants keep clear accounts and very seldom has the punishment exceeded the crime”. He charged them to narrow the ‘three differences’ between mental and manual work workers and peasants, city and countryside – and establish ‘three-in-one production teams’ of workers, technicians and specialists to raise productivity through participative innovation. Donping Han tells what happened next:

I grew up in Jimo, a Chinese village. In 1966, there were many illiterate people in my village. The Cultural Revolution weakened professionalsʼ control of education and allowed workers and peasants to have more say in their children’s education. Peasants were allowed to run their own village schools. A village would build its own primary school with local materials, hire its own teachers and provide free access to all children in the village. Several villages would pool their resources to build a free middle school for all peasant children, then the local commune would open free high schools for them. There were 1,050 villages in Jimo County and every village set up a primary school. All the rural children were able to go to school free.

Before the Cultural Revolution there were only seven middle schools in Jimo County, which had a population of 750,000. Now the number of middle schools increased to 249 and all primary school graduates could attend them free of charge, without passing tests. In the previous seventeen years 1,500 people graduated from the only high school in Jimo County and half went to college and never came back and Jimo was unable to train a single high school graduate for each village in the County. Now, every commune had three high schools. When I graduated from middle school in 1972, only 70 per cent of my classmates could enter high school. When my younger sister graduated in 1973, all her classmates could go to high school. By the end of the Cultural Revolution, in 1976, there were 100 high school graduates in my village and 12,000 in my commune.

The expansion of education during the Cultural Revolution years was unprecedented in Chinese history. It profoundly transformed the Chinese people and society. As the people became more educated, they became more empowered in both political and economic activities. In response to peasants’ demands, Mao next suspended college entrance examinations and called for high school graduates to work at least two years in a factory, the countryside, or the army to become eligible for college entrance. In 1973 the academic test was dropped and students were selected by fellow workers and peasants based on their work performance and, later, graduates were required to return to serve the communities that had sent them.

Part 2

If you’ve subscribed, this time next week you’ll automatically receive the conclusion, including Mao’s own assessments of the Cultural Revolution – and Xi Jinping’s.


Notes
1 The names of ‘notables’ executed are on file in French archives.

2 There are references to firefights between Red Guard factions who got their hands on PLA rifles but, if they happened, they were small scale and incidental to the Cultural Revolution.


ABOUT GODFREE ROBERTS
I'Data in the Middle' means that every policy is tested, implemented, tracked, and optimized based on terabytes of data. The PRC is the world's largest consumer of public surveys.  'Democracy at the Bottom' means that ordinary people have the last say on everything. 3,000 honest amateurs from across the country assemble twice a year to check the stats and sign off on new legislation. Policies need a minimum of 66% popular support to become law. That's why 95% of Chinese say the country is on the right track.

 


The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of  The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience. 

Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days. 
[newsletter_form]



All image captions, pull quotes, appendices, etc. by the editors not the authors. 
YOU ARE FREE TO REPRODUCE THIS ARTICLE PROVIDED YOU GIVE PROPER CREDIT TO THE GREANVILLE POST
VIA A BACK LIVE LINK. 
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

black-horizontal

 

black-horizontal

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
It’s super easy! Sign up to receive our FREE bulletin.  Get TGP selections in your mailbox. No obligation of any kind. All addresses secure and never sold or commercialised. 

[newsletter_form]

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 




Ukrainization of Taiwan by US and the Obstacles to Peaceful Reunification

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Wei Ling Chua
unz review

Originally run on September 4, 2023 • With Select Comments from Original Thread


To clearly explain a series of essential facts (including not widely noticed facts) about the relations between Taiwan Province, China, and the USA, one need to know the following basic facts:

Ignorance of Taiwan Youth about their own Constitution

Recently, a number of street interviews were conducted in Taiwan province asking young Taiwanese “Do you know the relationship between the Republic of China and Taiwan?”, the reply shocked the interviewer as the majority of the youth in Taiwan didn’t even know their political entity’s official name is the Republic of China (ROC), and that the ROC’s constitution regards the mainland of China and Taiwan being parts of the ROC sovereign territory. For example:

  • A street interview in June 2023 asked: “What is the relationship between Taiwan and the ROC?” The reply: “…Enemy…”; The interviewer then asked: “Have you heard of ROC? Do you know where ROC is?” The reply: “The other side of the Taiwan Straits? … I don’t know, I don’t know…” During the interview, almost all interviewees didn’t know the ROC, some later replied: “Taiwan” (with a guessing element after observing the interviewer’s tone).

  • A street interview in May 2023 asked: “What is the relationship between Taiwan and the ROC?” The reply: “… looks like the relationship is not too good…”; The interviewer then asked: “According to the ROC constitution, Taiwan sovereignty includes the mainland of China, do you know that?” The reply: “No”.

The above interviews demonstrated the success of the ongoing brainwashing tactics used by the current ruling party (the DPP) in Taiwan province by modifying historical facts in school textbooks in the past 2 decades. One needs just to search under “DDP modify Taiwan history textbook” to learn about the issues. If one uses simplified Chinese or traditional Chinese to search the subject, one will get even more examples and news on the topic of young Taiwanese being heavily brainwashed into believing that they are not a part of the Chinese civilization despite their shared history, culture, tradition, values, food habits, ethnicity, religions, and languages (spoken and written). This reflects the scary effect of what fake news and propaganda could do to divide society and create conflict across the world.

The one-China wording in the ROC Constitution

It is important to note that the content of the ROC Constitution is still the same today as before the Nationalist government lost the internal war to the Communist Party and escaped to Taiwan Province in 1949. It is also important to note that all the incoming Taiwan Presidents and MPs have to be sworn in under the Constitution of The ROC before taking office. So, what does the ROC Constitution say about the relation between the mainland of China and Taiwan island? The full text of the ROC’s Constitution is on the current Taiwan (Province) government’s official website. The following points shown that the ROC Constitution includes the entire mainland of China as its sovereign territory:

  • Point 4 of the Constitution: The territory of ROC based on its inherent boundaries, cannot be changed without a resolution of the National Assembly.

  • Point 6 refers to the design of the ROC flag used since 1928 (which is still in use today across Taiwan Province by whoever is in power);

  • Point 26: Outline the number of Representatives based on the population in an area/region for the National Assembly (with special mention of the Mongolia and Tibet regional representatives).

  • Point 64: About the makeup of representatives for law-making: this point also mentioned the minority population representative with special mention of Mongolia and Tibet regions.

  • Point 91: About the makeup of representatives in the Government Supervisory Body: again, Mongolia and Tibet regions are mentioned.

If we search for a map of the ROC, one will notice that the ROC territory in the map includes the People’s Republic of China (PRC) controlled mainland. That means the territory outlined in the Constitution of both the PRC and ROC includes Taiwan province and the Mainland of China. Both documents are the legal foundation of one-China. So:

  • Any Western media wording that suggests Taiwan province is not a part of China is without any legal foundation under both the ROC and the PRC Constitutions.

  • The Western media and politicians’ ongoing warning that “China is going to invade Taiwan” is preposterous because what they are warning is that China is about to invade itself.

  • America named the war between the South and the North (12 April 1861 to 26 May 1865) as the American Civil War revealing the double standard regarding the use of the term “invasion” to describe a possible future China reunification process through military action.

Therefore, the dispute between the PRC and ROC is a yet-to-settled historical event. It is purely a domestic issue between the 2 governments. Former Singapore Foreign Minister George Yao is right to point out in a recent interview that “China sees the Taiwan issue as a matter of historical justice”; he warns the Western powers about the danger of interfering in the reunification process.

The territory still under ROC control includes islands only 2 km away from the PRC-governed Mainland

Many people did not notice that the territory under the control of today’s ROC includes not only Taiwan Island itself but a number of islands right next to the mainland of the PRC. See the following screenshot map of the ROC (the purple territory in the bottom right-hand corner below is still under the control of the ROC):

One should note from the above map of the ROC-controlled (purple) territory that there are islands located right next to the mainland of China:

  • Kinmen Islands (or Jinmen Islands in pinyin): The nearest part of the Kinmen group of Islands is just 1.8 km from the PRC (mainland China); it is 210 km from Taiwan Island. Former Chinese World Bank Chief Economist Justin YiFu Lin was a ROC army official stationed in Kinmen Islands. He is the man who in 1979, swam 2130 meters to mainland China to call the PRC home;

  • Matsu Islands (or Mazu in Pinyin) The nearest part of this group of islands is 18.5 km away from the Mainland of China and 203 km away from Taiwan Island.

  • As for Taiwan Island itself, the nearest part to the mainland is 126 km away.

The above distance information between the ROC-controlled territory and the PRC-controlled mainland tells us a lot about the intention of the PRC government working towards a peaceful reunification:

  • If China (PRC) wanted to take those islands right next to the mainland by force, they would have done it a long time ago. There is no reason to doubt the PRC military capability to do so given their ability to force the US-led military coalition back more than 500 km from the China-DPRK border to the 38th parallel and stop the US-led military coalition’s further aggression in the 1950-1953 Korean War;

  • Even Taiwan Island (province) itself is so close to the mainland that a modern short-range missile and artillery are good enough to do the job of crippling the island’s economy and forcing a surrender; Contrary to people perception of US military superiority, the current military technological capability of the PLA may be more advanced than the USA.

  • Therefore, the ongoing Western media articles and news with headings that suggest China’s pending aggression and possible invasion of Taiwan to justify US/Japan/NATO/Australia/Canada militarism on the Chinese doorstep is nothing more than a smear campaign against China.

The History of Taiwan Island’s relation with the Chinese dynasties’ dates to 230AD

The history of Taiwan island’s relation with the Chinese dynasties can be traced back to 230AD. This site (English) and this site (Chinese) provide a detailed Timeline of Taiwan’s relations with the Chinese dynasties beginning as early as the year 230AD: During the 3 kingdoms era, a written record of (沈莹) Shen Ying under the title 临海水土志(direct transaction word by word: “surrounding seas water lands record”) already mentioned the Island of Taiwan. And that is almost 1800 years ago.

The trouble for many people who haven’t researched much about Chinese history is that they may be susceptible to Western media propaganda that portrays China as historically backward compared to the West, hence the ongoing smear campaign that China steals Western technology. So, it may be hard for some people to believe that in 230AD, the Chinese already has the shipping technology to explore islands hundreds of km away in the rough sea. So, it is important for one to note the following facts about the Chinese being far more advance than the West in shipping technology for thousands of years:

  • One should note that the compass used by Columbus to “discover” America in 1492 AD was a Chinese-invented compass (between 202 BC – 220 AD during the Han Dynasty);

  • 2500 years ago, China not only had a great military strategist Sun Zi (The Art of War) for land battles but also had a navy war strategist (伍子胥) Wu Zi Xu for water battles 水战兵法(direct word by word translation “Water war military strategy”).

One should also take note that before Columbus “discovered” America in 1492 (as if the Indigenous peoples on the continent at that time were not regarded as “human beings” and so, the land has to be “discovered” by a “higher being” from Europe), the Ming Dynasty Navy General Zheng He had already led 7 ocean expeditions traveling the world (1405 to 1433), with “hundreds of huge ships and tens of thousands of sailors and other passengers. More than 60 of the 317 ships on the first voyage were enormous Treasure Ships, sailing vessels over 400 hundred feet long, 160 feet wide, with several decks, 9 masts, 12 sails, and luxurious staterooms complete with balconies.”

It is important to note that, despite such a scale of world voyages, China did not do what Columbus and Captain Cook’s voyages did to the Indigenous population in what would become America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The Ming Dynasty Imperial Voyages led by General Zheng He (a Chinese Muslim) were peaceful in nature.

There is also a well-researched book 1421: The Year China Discovered the World (including America) by Gavin Menzies (a former British Royal Navy Submarine Commanding Officer) who spent 15 years tracing the astonishing voyages of the Ming Dynasty’s fleet, visited over 900 museums across the world, engaged in conversations and correspondence with Universities professors specialized in Asia Study, and reading hundreds of titles in European country’s libraries that mentioned the Chinese voyages. Despite the fact that Gavin’s compelling narrative pulls together ancient maps, precise navigational knowledge, astronomy, and the surviving accounts of Chinese explorers and the later European navigators, and that Gavin’s research also brings to light the artifacts and inscribed stones left behind by the emperor’s fleet, the evidence of the Ming Dynasty’s sunken junks along its route, and ornate votive offerings left by the Chinese sailors wherever they landed, Gavin’s book still discredited by the Western propaganda machine as “fiction” and “controversy”. As a reader of Kevin’s book to the last word, I am convinced by the incontrovertible evidence presented in regard to the Ming Dynasty Imperial Voyages, however, other readers’ opinions are also important. Please read the thousands of reader comments here, here, and here.

So, for those who are interested to know in detail about the 1800 years of history of Taiwan Island’s relation with the Chinese dynasties, please click here (English) and here (Chinese).

One should note that, in July 1894, Japan launched a war of aggression against China. In April 1895, the defeated Qing Dynasty government was forced to cede Taiwan, etc, to Japan in an unequal treaty (Treaty of Shimonoseki in Japanese, also known as Treaty of Maguan in Chinese).

International Treaties by US, UK, China, and Japan recognized Taiwan as China’s territory

1943 Cairo Declaration (Image of the original document): Signed by President Roosevelt (USA), Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek (ROC President), and Prime Minister Churchill (UK) as military allies against the Japanese military aggression. The objective of the Cairo Declaration is to “procure unconditional surrender of Japan,” and that “all the territories Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa (known as “Taiwan” in Chinese), and … shall be restored to the Republic of China” (The Chinese government at that time).

(Note: It seems that the US government history document website ( https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments ) has removed the Cairo Declaration document)

1945 INT Potsdam Declaration (Image of the original document) Point 8 stated: “The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out and Japanese sovereignty shall be limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku, and such minor islands as we determine.” And again, this international treaty was entered into by the US, China, and UK governments, and agreed upon by the Japanese government after the US dropped the 2 atomic bombs on Japan.

Note: the US government history document website shows the full content of this 13-point document including point 8.

So, the above two international documents entered by the US, China, UK, and Japan recognized Taiwan as a part of China, and Japan’s territory is limited to the islands of Honshu, Hokkaido, Kyushu, and Shikoku and such minor islands as we determine.”

UN Resolution replaced ROC with PRC as the only legitimate government of China

UN Resolution 2758: passed on 25 October 1971: “Recognized the People’s Republic of China (PRC) as “the only legitimate representative of China to the United Nations” and removed “the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek” (referring to the ROC) from the United Nations.

Since then, as of June 2023, out of the 193 UN member nations, only 12 smaller nations recognize the ROC government, and 181 recognize the PRC government. (Including the US and all other Western governments. This is the condition for establishing diplomatic relations with the PRC.)

As a result, the ROC (in Taiwan) needs the PRC’s approval to get access to any international organizations or institutions such as the Olympics, WHO, etc. The PRC’s sovereignty over Taiwan is officially recognized by the UN document and 181 UN member states.

Blood is Thicker than Water: The Policy of Peaceful Reunification from Mao to Xi

If one searches on the Internet for “台湾 血比水浓” (Taiwanese Blood is Thicker than Water), one will notice that there are millions of articles and news headlines over the decades describing the feeling of the Chinese people in the PRC towards the Chinese people in the ROC (Taiwan Province). They regard people in Taiwan as their brothers and sisters and hope for peaceful reunification.

Since the founding of the PRC, the Chinese leadership (from Mao to Xi) has been working hard toward a peaceful reunification with Taiwan Province. Just to name a few examples as follows:

Example 1:

During the Chinese Revolution, the then Nationalist Party government led by ROC President Chiang Kai-shek killed 6 of Chairman Mao’s relatives including Mao’s beloved wife (Yang Kaihui). In 1957, Chairman Mao wrote a touching poem in remembrance of his late wife with a description of his grief when he heard the news of her murder by the Nationalist government: “bursting into tears like rainwater” (泪飞顿作倾盆雨). Despite such personal grief in losing his loved one, Chairman Mao put the interest of the people and the Chinese nation first: For example:

After China and DPRK won the Korean War against the US-led 16-nation military coalition, there was a perception of Western nations trying to break Taiwan away from the motherland to create two Chinas, like the two Koreas (North and South Korea), and the two Germanys (East and West Germany). To prevent that, in 1956, Mao wrote a personal letter to Chiang Kai-shek, telling him the importance of Taiwan’s geographical position in accessing the Pacific Ocean for the Chinese nation, and urged him to safeguard the interest of the Chinese civilization to maintain the principle of a one-China policy. That is Taiwan province and the mainland as integrated parts of one China. He then raised the idea of negotiation toward a peaceful reunification under the following principles:

  • Foreign Powers should be out of Taiwan.

  • Taiwan must recognize the Central People’s Government as the only legitimate government of the PRC.

  • Both the Nationalist Party and the Communist Party must uphold the principle of a one-China policy.

  • Chiang Kai-Shek will enjoy a special privileged status once Taiwan is unified with the mainland.

  • Once unified, besides Foreign Affairs and Defence, Chiang Kai-Shek will retain the power of administering Taiwan in all other aspects such as the power for the appointment of officials and their removal in Taiwan, the treasury in Taiwan, and Chiang is allowed to keep his arm forces, and the central government will fund the development of Taiwan.

  • Once unified, both sides will stop covert operations and propaganda against each other and will not do anything to damage the relationship of both political parties.

In the letter, Mao also enclosed a photo of Chiang’s ancestor’s grave in China, telling him that they are well maintained. (Photo below):

 

Unfortunately, for Chiang, it was a hard decision.

Chiang died in 1975; to this day, his coffin is still not buried. According to his son Chiang Jing-guo’s Diary: Chiang wished to be buried on the mainland: at Nanjing, Sun Yat-sen Mausoleum in Zijin Mountain, Zhengqi Pavilion. Therefore, they are waiting for the day when the political climate is such that Chiang can be so interred.

Example 2:

In 1981, the PRC spelled out a 9 points policy toward peaceful reunification under a One-China policy (below is a translation from the Chinese text):

  • The Communist Party and the Nationalist Party can negotiate on an equal footing.

  • The two parties reached an agreement on postal, commercial, air, family visits, tourism, and academic, culture, and sports exchanges.

  • After reunification, Taiwan can retain the military and enjoy special autonomy as a special administrative region.

  • Taiwan’s society, economic system, way of life, and economic and cultural relations with other foreign countries remain unchanged; private property, houses, land, business ownership, legal inheritance rights, and foreign investment are inviolable.

  • Political leaders in Taiwan can serve as leaders of the national political institutions and participate in national management.

  • When Taiwan’s local finances are in difficulty, the central government can subsidize them at its discretion.

  • Taiwanese who wish to return to the mainland to live are guaranteed to make proper arrangements, come and go freely, and not be discriminated against.

  • Welcome Taiwanese businesses’ investment in the mainland, their legal rights and profits are guaranteed.

  • People and organizations from all walks of life in Taiwan are welcome to provide unified suggestions and discuss state affairs together.

Has any other nation in world history ever gone to such lengths, patience, inclusiveness, and generosity in pursuing peaceful reunification with an offer like this? The PRC government has always believed that given time, it would be able to develop China into a better and better society and would eventually unify with every heart and mind in Taiwan.

Of course, the Western media will never tell the world the above generous 9 points offered to Taiwan for peaceful reunification. They will only tell the world China is bullying Taiwan.

Example 3:

After years of negotiations, in 1992, the PRC Communist Party and the ROC Nationalist Party reach an agreement in Singapore to deepen the exchange of people between both sides. Both Parties agree to the principles of One China, and any other issues can be negotiated with flexibility. The term used for such a historic agreement is “1992 Consensus.”

Example 4:

In order to win the hearts and minds of the brothers and sisters in Taiwan province, the PRC has been very generous to Taiwan’s farmers and businesses and allowed Taiwan to enjoy an enormous trade surplus of up to $104.68 billion a year. About 44% of Taiwan’s exports go to mainland China. Without the PRC’s economic support, Taiwan’s economy would likely have fallen into a negative GDP like most parts of the Western world.

Again, the Western mass media is uninterested in reporting the above trade statistics.

Example 5:

The ROC-controlled Kinmen (Jinmen) Islands with a rising population and water shortage problem. Between 2006 and 2022, the population of the Jinmen Islands increased from 76,000 to 141,500. To help the brothers and sisters in Jinmen solve their water problem, the PRC government invested heavily over a period of 22 years in infrastructure to lay an underground and undersea pipeline to deliver water from the mainland to the islands. And sell the water to the islands at a subsidized price of 9.89 Taiwan dollars per unit of water, which is cheaper than the charges per unit of water supplied by the local authority on the islands.

Again, the Western media won’t report news like this. They will only keep spreading the message to the world: “China bullies Taiwan” and “China is going to invade Taiwan”.

Example 6:

Like the US, after decades of political infighting, corruption, and incompetency in managing the economy and infrastructure upgrade, Taiwan suffered a series of issues including an electricity shortage that requires rationing from area to area. So, Power Rationing Information is made available for residents to check when their area power will be cut off and for how long. Such a situation has been the new normal for several years already. It has badly affected business activities and damaged foreign investment. As a result, Taiwan’s youth unemployment rate has been consistently above 10%. And nearly 60% of the Taiwanese working overseas went to China. A report in 2017 by TVBS Taiwan showed that: over a period of 35 years, Taiwan startup wages remained almost the same, 70% of Taiwan youth refused to be trapped by low wages and wished to start their own business in order to make more money. Forbes Magazine reported the issue: “Workers in Taiwan are struggling. They took home an average of $1,510 per month in 2016, according to Taiwan’s National Development Council, which is low for an industrialized Asian economy that has developed a lot like Singapore and South Korea over the decades.”

In response to such low wages and employment problems faced by Taiwanese youth, Chairman Xi canceled the work permit requirement for Taiwanese people to seek employment on the mainland.

In fact, as early as 2016, The China People’s Congress had already set up an RMB40 billion fund, to help facilitate Taiwan Youth intent on setting up their own business in China.

Again, the Western mass media is uninterested in this kind of news. They will keep telling the world that China is bullying Taiwan.

Example 7:

Subscribe to New Columns

There are too many stories of the PRC government (from Chairman Mao to Chairman Xi) extending goodwill to the Taiwanese people and awaiting eventual peaceful reunification. It is impossible to list them all. So, just to provide a couple more examples below:

  • Whenever an overseas emergency happens, such as an outbreak of war, the Chinese embassies and military will immediately evacuate all Chinese citizens, including any Taiwanese who apply to the PRC with a Taiwan Compatriot ID document. Click here for a few dozen short news and videos.

  • Any Taiwanese who run into trouble while overseas can easily seek help from any of the Chinese embassies in the respective country. Several Taiwanese friends I met, while I was working in Eastern Europe based in Hungary in the 1990s, told me that the PRC embassy staff are more helpful than the ROC commercial office representative.

In 2022, China released a White Paper titled “The Taiwan Question and China’s Reunification in the New Era” (Here is the full text In English and Chinese). It is a bit lengthy but worth reading. The policy document outlines the intention to reintegrate Taiwan by all possible peaceful means, and the many benefits Taiwan people will enjoy in the process, including all the tax revenue collected in Taiwan will be used solely for the social well-being of the Taiwanese people and the economic development of Taiwan.

China: There is no Taiwan problem, only an American-caused problem

China is a country with a very long history of peace culture. Examples:

  • Malaysia’s former Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir said: “We always say, we have had China as a neighbour for 2000 years, we were never conquered by them. But the Europeans came in 1509, and in two years, they conquered Malaysia.”

  • East Timor President Jose Ramos-Horta defended China’s role as a growing strategic and economic power in Asia-Pacific in the National Press Club of Australia (2022), arguing: “China has hardly ever invaded other countries and was unlikely to do so in the future.”

  • Indonesia’s Defence Minister Prabowo Subianto said in Singapore (2022) during an interview with Aljazeera: “But China has also helped us. China has also defended us, and China is now a very close partner with Indonesia. And actually, China has always been the leading civilization in Asia. Many of our sultans, kings, our princes in those days would marry princesses from China. We have hundreds of years of relationship.”

The above 3 positive comments about China are from leaders of three of China’s neighbouring countries in Asia. Their country’s experience with China since ancient times tells a lot about the peaceful nature of China. The question here is: will Latin American countries, African countries, other Asian countries, and Middle Eastern countries, say the same about their country’s experience with the US and Europe? Or perhaps, will European countries within Europe say the same about their own neighbouring countries within Europe?

The reality is that: Western imperialism is not dead after the 2 World Wars; in particular, the USA has always been a troublemaker for the rest of the world. The following examples should provide us with a good picture of how the US is threatening peace in Asia, and its main target since 2008 is China:

US: Chinese are not allowed to be wealthy

During the 2008 GFC, US Secretary of Finance Henry Paulson visited China almost every month to seek help to stabilize the dollar’s status as a reserve currency. As a result, China bought almost an extra $600b in US Treasury debts in 2008, which accounted for over half the total issued by the US government to bail out the too-big-to-fail banks and the US economy that year.

Once the US economy stabilized, the world stopped dumping the dollar due to China injected $600b confidence in US treasury debts, the only positive thing China received from America in return for its support of the US economy is an open praise from Henry Paulson in the New York Times on 22 Oct 2008 “Thanking China’s cooperation in easing the Financial Crisis“.

Since then, in 2010, Obama said in Australia: “If over 1 billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now, then all of us are in for a very miserable time. The planet just can’t sustain it.”

In 2011, an opinion piece in the New York Times suggested that Obama “should enter into closed-door negotiations with Chinese leaders to write off the $1.14 trillion of American debt currently held by China in exchange for a deal to end American military assistance and arms sales to Taiwan and terminate the current United State-Taiwan defense arrangement by 2015.” Years later, a Wikileaks leaked email revealed the then Secretary of States Hillary Clinton wanted to discuss ditching Taiwan in exchange for China to erase US debts.

In 2013, a Jimmy Kimmel Live show on ABC asked some kids what to do about the $1.3 trillion of debts the US owes to China, a very young boy suggested that “The US kill everyone in China instead of repaying its debts.”

In 2021, Joe Biden said in a press conference: “China wants to become the most wealthy, powerful country but it’s ‘not gonna happen on my watch’.”

In 2023, under the excuse of an imaginary “China threat” and to “Protect Taiwan from China invasion”, US politicians proposed a series of bipartisan bills aiming to restrict how China can use its money, restricting China’s rights in International Financial Institutions, and a plan to confiscate China’s sovereign fund and Chinese citizens’ overseas bank accounts and assets like the way the US and Europe did to the Russians in 2022.

Please click the following links for detail of their proposed “looting” bills:

  • H.R.554, the “Taiwan Conflict Deterrence Act of 2023”, sponsored by Rep. French Hill.

  • H.R.510, the “Chinese Currency Accountability Act of 2023,” sponsored by Rep. Warren David.

  • H.R.839, the “China Exchange Rate Transparency Act of 2023,” sponsored by Rep. Dan Meuser.

  • H.R.803, the “Protect Taiwan Act,” sponsored by Rep Frank Lucas.

From the above series of behaviours and statements made by two US Presidents, a Secretary of State, a very young boy, the US media, and 4 politicians who sponsored anti-China bills, it is hard not to come to the conclusion about the ungrateful nature of Americans. It would appear to me that the robber DNA is deep in the blood and bone of many people in the US society (I hate to generalize my comment unless someone can convince me that the above-named series of behaviours within the US society are merely coincident!).

US military threat to China at China’s doorstep

Let’s put aside the various issues from a reported 2012 US plan to deploy 60% of the US Navy fleet to the Asia Pacific by 2020, and the 2011 Obama Pacific Pivot with a secret plan to start a war against China by 2030 with a coalition of nations to militarily control commercial shipment to and from China via the South China seas to limit China freedom to trade with the rest of the world, and should China resist, the US-led military coalition would begin to attack China.

John Pilger, an award-winning journalist produced a 2 hours documentary with detail of US military bases around China, and how the US may plan to start a war with China.

In 2017, US Admiral Scott Swift assured everyone he was ready to follow President Trump’s orders to launch a nuclear missile against China.

In 2022, former US National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien suggested destroying Taiwan’s semiconductor factories rather than letting them fall into China’s hands.

In 2023, US talk show host Garland Nixon wrote on Twitter that White House insiders said that US President Joe Biden had warned about a plan for “the destruction of Taiwan,” when asked if there could be any greater disaster than the Ukraine crisis.

There are endless US military activities and arrangements targeting China in recent years. Just to list a few more examples below:

  • While the Western media and politicians keep telling the world that the PLA is increasingly aggressive against Western countries’ (military) freedom of navigation in the South and East China Seas, a recent report by the US Department of Defence revealed that “the US has conducted around 120 military exercises a year with allies and partners in the region.” Ironically, such statistics of US military aggression on China’s doorstep failed to attract the interest of the Western Media.

  • In 2021, Australia reached a deal with US and UK on a $386b nuclear submarine deal with China as their target.

  • In 2022, US Defense Secretary Austin announced that: “The US is at a pivotal point with China and needs military strength to ensure that American values, not Beijing’s, set global norms in the 21st century.” He then talked about the need to align the US budget as never before to the China Challenge. He then mentioned a $1.2 trillion estimated cost as part of a major nuclear triad overhaul underway by the Congressional Budget Office.

One should note that such an additional budget for military expenses is on top of the fact that the US military already spent more than the next 10 countries combined.

  • In July 2023, USS Kentucky, a US nuclear submarine (capable of firing nuclear ballistic missiles) suddenly arrived in Busan, South Korea.

  • Again, in July 2023, NATO head Jens Stoltenberg pushed to increase ties with Asia with the intention to form an Asia NATO alliance. Former Australia PM Paul Keating labelled Stoltenberg a ‘supreme fool’ and ‘an accident on its way to happen’.

To justify NATO’s intention to set up its military presence in Asia, NATO engaged in a series of smeared campaigns against an imaginary China’s threats based on NATO’s own past behaviours across the world. The latest smear campaign was in the NATO Vilnius Summit Communique. As a result, China’s Permanent Representative to the UN refuted NATO’s false accusations against China, and challenges NATO if it can make the same claims as China on the following 6 points:

  1. China has never invaded other countries.

  2. China has never engaged in proxy wars.

  3. China has never carried out military operations around the world.

  4. China did not threaten other countries with force.

  5. China did not export ideology.

  6. China did not interfere in other countries’ internal affairs.

The reality is that the US initiated an all-out hostility against China after China help the US out of the 2008 GFC. Examples:

  1. Obama’s Pacific Pivot;

  2. Obama’s TPP to Exclude China from International Trade;

  3. Trump and Biden all-out trade Wars.

  4. Trump and Biden all-out technological wars.

  5. US military deployments, and military activities surrounding China. Despite the US already having 313 of its 750 worldwide military bases surrounding China, the US continued to expand by another 4 recently via the Philippines with 3 of them close to Taiwan.

The Ukrainization of Taiwan

Despite the past US administrations (1972, 1979, 1982) entering into 3 Joint Communique with China Over the Taiwan question (The One-China agreements), the US politicians have over the years through their own acts, brutally violate all the written agreements with China re the One-China Policy. The latest developments are the worst:

In July 2023, US House passed an amendment to National Defense Authorization Act to ban Pentagon maps from depicting Taiwan and its major outlying islands, Kinmen, Penghu, Mazudao, Wuchudao, and Ludao (etc) as part of China. (Here is the content of the original amendment bill).

Below is just a quick list of examples of US violating all its signed One-China documents with China to provoke a war over Taiwan:

  • In 2021, Taiwan English News reported the news of “Pentagon doubled the number of US troops in Taiwan”,

  • In 2022, VOA (Chinese news) reported that the US has again increased the number of its military personnel in Taiwan. The intention is to help to coordinate both militaries in a possible future war with China.

  • In April 2023, US lawmaker, Chairman of the US House Foreign Affairs Committee Michael McCaul pledged to help provide training for Taiwan’s armed forces and to speed up the delivery of weapons.

  • In July 2023, it was widely reported in Taiwan that the U.S. wants Taiwan to set up a P4 Biological Laboratory. Yahoo Chinese News pointed out that Taiwan Chinese newspaper (联合报) is the first to break the detail of the Biological Weapons Lab story. Taiwan CTI TV news reported the detail that the Lab is to test biological weapons using Chinese DNA as “the DNA of the Taiwan population can represent Chinese DNA.” Not surprisingly: the Western media is very much silent on this kind of news despite the fact that the US State Department later denied the Taiwanese report that the US asked Taiwan to develop weaponized biological agents.

  • Perhaps to justify a possible pre-emptive war against China under the Bush Doctrine in the foreseeable future, the US Congress passed a $500m anti-China propaganda bill in February 2022. How much of this $500m goes to brainwashing Taiwanese?

In a recent interview, Jeffrey Sachs describes a series of US actions against China as a “Path to War With China

DPP politicians prepare for war and an escape route while Taiwan people reject war

The trouble with Western forms of so-called democracy is that to win an election, one needs to build an election war chest. That is to seek political donations in return for favours when one is in a position of power. It usually involves an under-the-table deal between politicians and their donors. As a result, corporate donors, billionaires, foreign cash, and foreign powers could easily penetrate domestic politics.

Since the beginning of Taiwan having a Western form of election, dark money, corruption, bribery, and scandals news become a part of the social norm within the Taiwanese political circle. If we search for the name of any DPP senior politicians (especially Ministers and Prime Ministers) with the term “Dark-Money”, “corruption”, or “scandals”, one should notice almost no innocent people in the system. As Western media usually self-censored negative news linked to the Pro-independent party, so, the best way to search for such news is to search in the Chinese language. For examples:

  • Search in Chinese for corruption of the Current Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen;

  • Search her deputy (the coming DPP presidential candidate) Lai Ching-te;

Corruption and democracy often go hand in hand. Here are some hyperlinks to examples of how the US interferes in foreign elections:

Those who follow the Taiwan issue via the Taiwan media should notice that, while those Taiwan politicians ally with the US foreign policy and campaign for independence, most of their family members (including themselves) already have US or other Western countries’ citizenship, bank accounts, and assets. For examples,

  • A report in Taiwan media in 2015 revealed that half of the current Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen family members with foreign citizenship;

  • As for the Vice President (the coming DPP presidential candidate) OCCRP (Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project): “Zelensky and his inner circle have unexplained $ billions overseas.”

    In fact, during Taiwan’s military exercises, one of their programs is on how the president could safely escape if a war breaks out (Of course, whenever the Taiwan media reported such escape details, the Ministry of Defense will deny it.)

    The tragedy for the average Taiwanese people is that the island economy was already damaged before such a war would begin. According to a recent Financial Times report: “‘People are nervous’: Taiwan’s wealthy shelter money overseas in fear of China conflict.” The same thing happened to foreign companies in Taiwan with “half of the foreign companies in Taiwan making contingency plans due to evacuations and supply chain disruptions concerns.” The latest Taiwan GDP is down 3.02%.

    The reality in Taiwan is that many young people refuse to join the army, and the DPP government is having a problem recruiting new soldiers. As a result:

    • The DPP government decided to extend the existing soldiers serving time by an additional year.

    • In June 2023, Taiwan amend the military recruitment regulation to include recruits from Hong Kong and Macao people working and living in Taiwan.

    • Again, in June, the DPP government reportedly worked with the Ministry of Education to impose a 3 + 1 university program. That is 3 years of study plus a year of military training.

    In February 2023, Jinmen Island local lawmakers voted to declare Jinmen a non-military zone, and Jinmen governor Li Zhufeng (李炷烽) suggests using Jinmen Island as a pilot program for the One Country Two Systems and expanding gradually thereafter.

    Professor John V. Wash in a recent article titled “Arming Taiwan is an Insane Provocation” cited a hyperlink to a 2022 polling that showed that an overwhelming majority (82.1%) of Taiwanese now would like to preserve the status quo with only 5.3% wanting immediate independence.”

    How much longer will China tolerate the US’s endless escalating military provocations?

    In July 2023, Hungary Prime Minister Orban observed that “Beijing managed to develop as much in 30 years as other countries in 200 years. Therefore, they can claim their “place under the sun”. However, Washington does not accept that quick development, the fact that China preceded them in many sectors… As a result, a clash between the two world powers is inevitable…. War is not inevitable, but the USA does not accept that it has become the world’s second most powerful nation, Orbán added.”

    An article on Education Monitor News rightly pointed out that “The Greatest Threat to the USA is not China, but Peace.”

    In 2014, the New York Times put up an article titled ‘The Lack of Major Wars may be Hurting Economic Growth.’

    One should bear in mind that the USA was created on the foundation of invasion, massacre, looting, and enslavement of others. Not a single thing the US possesses today is through peaceful means including every inch of its current territory.

    Since 2008, China already realized that its kindness towards the US will only be perceived as a weakness. That will only encourage more aggression and greed from the US imperialist rulers. So, the first thing Chairman Xi did after taking office in 2012 is to visit a PLA military base. He openly called upon the PLA to prepare for war and to win the war.

    In February 2023, China released a report titled “US Hegemony and Its Perils,” and in May “America’s Coercive Diplomacy and its Harm” outlining the many crimes committed by the US against the world, and that China is no longer interested in accommodating the US crimes and behaviours.

    In March 2023, a Chinese government website reported that Chairman Xi Jinping told a group of more than 300 high-ranking government officials that: “History has repeatedly proven that if we seek security through resolve, security will prevail; If we seek security through concessions, security will perish; If we seek development through resolve, development will prosper; If we seek development through compromises, our development will suffer.”

    In June 2023, China released The Law on Foreign Relations of the People’s Republic of China outlining the country’s attitude toward foreign relations, UN Charters, International Laws, and possible counter-action against any hostile foreign policy and behaviours that harms Chinese interest and security.

    In July, China called NATO “a trouble-maker”, and issued a warning to NATO: “Beijing doesn’t cause trouble, but is not afraid of trouble”. Days later, the Chinese ambassador to the US issued a direct warning to Washington: “If people violate me, I will hit back.”

    So, how long will China continue to tolerate US provocation? How long will China allow the US military to continue to violate its sovereignty in Taiwan? Will China allow the US more time to arm Taiwan like what they did in Ukraine before Putin would no longer tolerate the threats and was forced to take military action?


Selected Comments

xyzxy says:

It is certainly the case that the US is attempting to ‘Ukraine’ Taiwan. However, unlike the Ukraine, there is no realistic logistical way the US can support Taiwan Island in any ongoing military sense, without resorting to total war against the mainland. This is different from the Ukraine situation, where the US/NATO has waged a failed economic war against Russia, but has not had to directly attack the country in order to support their on-going war against Russia, using the Ukraine as proxy.

Pace US/NATO, there is currently no analogous NATO-like military pact to assist the US in any hot war against China. The US is attempting to get Japan on board, but I suspect the Japanese are frankly not interested in actual warfare.

Which leaves Australia, and possibly the Philippines, in a supporting role. But even those countries would no doubt think twice before participating in any actual shooting war against China.

Currently, the US is waging economic war against mainland China, with quite limited success. The longer that goes on, the less effective it will be, as Chinese industry adapts, accordingly.

It is also the case that if the US would cease military support of the DPP, the island and mainland would attempt to resolve their differences peacefully, through political means supported via mutual trade. However, like Ukraine, the US is not interested in accepting a peaceful solution.

The fact that historical (even recent history) understanding among island youth is poor, is typical for the age. My guess is, however, that Taiwan youth are less ignorant than most American youth, when it comes to their history, both recent and old. But that is not saying much.

Finally, one must recognize that the main goal of the US, whether in Taiwan or anywhere else in the world for that matter, is to create death, destruction, and general chaos. They are doing it among their own majority population, so what’s it to them if they export that around the world?



During their private interview with

, the

asked him how he knew a Ukrainian operative who took a photo with him the day of J6 2021. Chansley didn’t know the guy, and FBI confirmed that the Ukrainian Sergai Dybynyn was a Ukrainian spy who is affiliated with the Nazi Azov Battalion. This means the US Capitol was penetrated by Ukrainian spies and the US Government and FBI have still not arrested these people or made the public aware of foreign penetration. This is an act of war by Ukraine against the United States, and yet the US Government has sent $200 BILLION to Ukraine in the last 2 years. The CIA is funding a color revolution in the United States via Ukrainian Nazis and American Nazis who are being recruited by the CIA and FBI to fight overseas in the Azov Battalion and then come back to the US to instigate Nazi political movements in a psyop intended to make right wingers look bad. The reality is, these people are Democrats and Biden supporters and the FBI has been hiding the fact that Ukrainian operatives penetrated the US Capitol on J6 and they have been hiding the fact that they are working with Ukrainian Nazis to instigate violence to subvert the US Government, including actions to impeach President Trump, instigate violence at Charlottesville which was used as Biden’s reason for running for President against Trump, and to stage violence at the Capitol on J6. Now the FBI and CIA are using Ukrainian Nazis to instigate racial division in the US during an election year so that Neo Nazi marches pop up in red states when voters are deciding who to vote for ahead of 2024. This is a CIA funded domestic terror operation intended to interfere in the U.S. Election and to make sure Donald Trump is never allowed to be President ever again. This is treason. And everyone involved needs to go to prison. This might be the biggest story I have ever uncovered.


Editor's Note: The above two comments seem of value. The rest—for the most part—reflect the appallingly ignorant and semi-deranged right-wing racist readership of UNZ, a platform that deserves better since it defends free speech. The preceding not to be interpreted as an endorsement of what passes today for "the Left" in the US and the collective West, these being in general an upper middle class mob following the idiotic corpo-imperialist dictates of the global plutocracy.



Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




In A World Ruled By Propaganda, A Sane Worldview Will Necessarily Be A Fringe Worldview

Be sure to distribute this article as widely as possible. Pushing back against the Big Lie is really up to you.


Caitlin Johnstone
ROGUE JOURNALIST



One of the worst mistakes you can make when formulating your understanding of the world is to begin with the assumption that the truest and most accurate position must lie somewhere near the center of the two major political perspectives you see laid out all around you. 

It’s a well-documented fact that the rich and powerful pour vast fortunes into manipulating the political and media landscape in ways that serve their interests. Their control over the news media and Silicon Valley tech platforms is used to set the agenda and influence public perception by determining what issues will receive attention and which won’t in ways that preserve the political status quo they’ve built their empire upon, thereby shrinking the Overton window of acceptable debate down to a very narrow spectrum whose outcomes can’t threaten their interests in any way.

said “the smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.”

People assume there must be truth in the mainstream worldview because so many others are invested in the mainstream worldview, when really the only reason that worldview is mainstream in the first place is because so much wealth and influence has gone into making it mainstream. In reality the assumption that the truth exists anywhere in either of the two mainstream political viewpoints promoted by the managers of the Western empire is an example of the bandwagon effect, which describes the cognitive bias in which humans tend to take on beliefs, behaviors, styles and attitudes solely because that’s what the people around them are doing.

This bias would have had evolutionary advantages early on in our development as a species. Back when our evolutionary ancestors were prey for prehistoric carnivores, it was a survival advantage to start running for your life if you saw other members of your tribe running, even if you personally didn’t see what they were running from. As primates whose survival depended on social cohesion, being rejected by the tribe would mean almost certain death by predation or starvation, so it was necessary to conform in whatever ways prevented that rejection from happening.

But we don’t live in prehistoric times anymore. We live in a civilization with a highly complex information environment that is being continually manipulated away from truth and accuracy and toward the advantage of powerful people who rule over us. If you go along with the herd, you’ll be deceived.


In truth the so-called “centrists” or “moderates” of our world are really violent extremists, because they support the most murderous and tyrannical power structure on our planet, and are only regarded as moderate because they sit in the mid-range of a completely artificially created spectrum. A perspective that is actually sane will be about as far away from their perspective as you can get.

Because the majority of people have been duped by propaganda into espousing mainstream political perspectives, those with an accurate read on things will necessarily be a small fringe minority until that dynamic changes. As long as your entire civilization is structured around deceit-based perspectives which serve the powerful, going along with the crowd will prevent you from forming a truth-based perspective that serves human interests.

So you’ll have to get comfortable rejecting mainstream orthodoxies, dismissing mainstream media, and shunning mainstream politics, because those things are all inseparably interwoven with the matrix of deceit by which our rulers have pulled the blindfold over this civilization. This won’t be a sign that you’re out of touch or a kooky crackpot or some snobby hipster who rejects all things mainstream out of a pathological need to be different, it will be a sign that you are seeing things clearly.

said, “The cost of sanity in this society is a certain level of alienation.” But we can still find each other online, so we’re never really alone, and the cost is definitely worth it. The sincere pursuit of a truth-based perspective is ultimately the surest path not only toward a healthy society, but toward lasting happiness as an individual as well.


All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, throwing some money into my tip jar on PatreonPaypal, or Substack, buying an issue of my monthly zine, and following me on FacebookTwitterSoundcloud or YouTube. If you want to read more you can buy my books. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

This is a dispatch from our ongoing series by Caitlin Johnstone


Caitlin Johnstone is a brave journalist, political junkie, relentless feminist, champion of the 99 percent. And a powerful counter-propaganda tactician. 
 

 


Covid-19 has put this site on ventilators.
DONATIONS HAVE DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW




 NOTE : ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




The period in American history that started on 25 July 1945 ended on 19 June 2023

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Eric Zuesse
CROSSPOSTED w. THE DURAN

JFK meeting with IKE. The latter was acutely concerned about his image in history, and wanted to portray himself as a civilised statesman rather than a mere war chief. However, from China and Vietnam, to Cuba and Europe itself, all his moves in the White House were consistent with the drive and objectives of US imperialism.




On 19 June 2023, it finally became clear that America's 78-year-long neoconservative period (i.e., the period of the U.S. Government's aspiring to become the first-ever all-encompassing empire, ruler over the entire world) — the period of nearly 300 U.S. military invasions since 1945 — is finally over. 

On 20 June 2023, the anonymous author of the Moon of Alabama blog, who has long been chronicling the death-throes of the neoconservative dream that has been ruling in America, finally announced the end of that dream, and I here shall take the liberty to post below his historic article, which not only announces, at long last, its end, but which quotes the evidence that it now is only past history and no longer will be leading America to go off the cliff into WW III, nuclear Armageddon:


https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/06/us-admits-defeat-in-war-on-russia-and-china.html

June 20, 2023

U.S. Admits Defeat In War On Russia And China

(TGP screenshot)

Confronted with the realities of life the Biden administration has in the last days acknowledged defeat in two on its most egregious and delusional foreign policy games.

The Ukrainian counter-offensive has failed. Its army is getting slaughtered on the battlefield. The 'counteroffensive' of the 'NATO trained' Ukrainian brigades has made no real progress on any front. The high level of losses of men and material make it impossible that it will ever again regain the initiative.

The U.S. aim was to integrate the Ukraine into NATO. It would then have been able to station U.S. troops in Ukraine and to put its weapons into reach of Moscow so that any independent Russian move could be countered with a threat of imminent annihilation.

After more than 20 years of pursuing that aim the U.S. threw the towel:

President Biden on Saturday said he won’t make it easier for Ukraine to join NATO, adding that the country at war with Russia has to meet the requirements to be a member.

“They got to meet the same standards. So, I’m not going to make it easier,” Biden told reporters. “I think they’ve done everything relating to demonstrating the ability to coordinate militarily, but there’s a whole issue of is their system secure? Is it noncorrupt? Does it meet all the standards … every other nation in NATO does.”

And yes, that is a change. A big one:

Biden has reportedly previously expressed that he is open to removing the Member Action Plan hurdle for Ukraine to join NATO, which requires countries that want to join the alliance make reforms militarily and democratically.

Still, it is not enough:

Biden has not said anything new. Biden senses that the US lost the proxy war but he must not and cannot admit it. So, in the absence of a time machine, which could have taken him all the way back to 1999 when the NATO’s expansion began unfolding, Biden simply walked back to the default position of the 2008 NATO Summit at Bucharest welcoming Ukraine into the alliance via the MAP route — as if that moment fifteen years ago is now the past and cannot be pulled back to the present. Russia is not going to accept it. 

Though packaged in nice words the European Union gave Ukraine a similar negative outlook (machine translation):

An EU report on Ukraine's membership bid states that Kiev has so far met two of the seven conditions required to start formal EU accession negotiations. ...

"There is progress. The report will be moderately positive. This is not about embellishing reality, but about recognizing progress, for example, there are well-known anti-corruption cases. In particular, in the case of the head of the Supreme Court Knyazev," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.  ...

“In terms of reforms, the glass would be half full, we would never take a negative tone towards Ukraine at the moment. Judicial reforms have made some progress, although there are still key ones that need to be carried out. Not everything is satisfactory.”

The much-hyped counter-offensive has indeed become a death trap for the U.S. EU and NATO.

The other U.S. defeat was acknowledged by U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken at the end of his trip to Bejing:

The United States will not support Taiwan breaking away from China, Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has said, amid a series of confusing statements by Joe Biden on the issue.

'We do not support Taiwan independence,' America's top diplomat said in Beijing after meeting with Chinese president Xi Jingping.

This was more than a verbal change in Blinken's pronouncements:

The US State Department has updated its fact sheet on Taiwan again to reinstate a line about not supporting formal independence for the Chinese-claimed, democratically governed island. ...

Last month, the State Department changed its website on Taiwan, removing wording both on not supporting Taiwan independence and on acknowledging Beijing’s position that Taiwan is part of China, which angered Beijing.

Blinken's change of heart came after an extremely short meeting with President Xi which had followed a series of lectures by other high ranking Chinese officials:

Wang gave a comprehensive explanation of the historical logic and inevitable trend of China's development and rejuvenation, and elaborated on the distinctive features of Chinese modernization and the rich substance of China's whole-process people's democracy.

He urged the U.S. side not to project onto China the assumption that a strong country is bound to seek hegemony and not to misjudge China with the beaten path of traditional Western powers. "This is key to whether the United States can truly return to an objective and rational policy toward China."

Wang demanded that the United States stop playing up the so-called "China threat", lift illegal unilateral sanctions against China, stop suppressing China's scientific and technological advances, and do not wantonly interfere in China's internal affairs.

He stressed that safeguarding national unity has always been the core of China's core interests. It is where the future of the Chinese nation lies and the abiding historical mission of the CPC.

On the Taiwan question, China has no room for compromise or concession, Wang said.

The Chinese language readout of the Blinken-Wang meetings is reportedly even more scornful than its English translation.

The next step for China is to stop the provocative 'innocent passage' drive-bys by U.S. military ships and airplanes in the Taiwan Straits. To do that it simply has to apply the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea:

Article 38

Right of transit passage

A view on a map shows that this evidently applies to the strait between mainland China and the Chinese island named Taiwan.

bigger

If the U.S. really has a One China policy it will have to accept that the Strait is off limits.

This double whammy of defeat in its wars on Russia and China will take some time to stick.

In the Ukraine conflict there are still dreams of creating some kind of stalemate, of implementing some kind of a Korean cease-fire demarcation line on the 38th parallel:

U.S. officials are planning for the growing possibility that the Russia-Ukraine war will turn into a frozen conflict that lasts many years — perhaps decades — and joins the ranks of similar lengthy face-offs in the Korean peninsula, South Asia and beyond.

The options discussed within the Biden administration for a long-term “freeze” include where to set potential lines that Ukraine and Russia would agree not to cross, but which would not have to be official borders. The discussions — while provisional — have taken place across various U.S. agencies and in the White House.

Russia wont have any of that. It will thoroughly defeat the Ukrainian army. It will retake the parts of Ukraine which for centuries had been Russian before the communists assigned those administratively to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.

The rest of a then-neutral Ukraine, cut off from the sea and the mineral riches of the east, will be handed over to the underling that Russia is willing to accept.

The double defeat in its wars against the 'rest of the world' marks the end of the Wolfowitz doctrine:

The doctrine announces the U.S.'s status as the world's only remaining superpower following the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War and proclaims its main objective to be retaining that status.

Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.

The end of the 'unilateral moment' is there for anyone to see.

The Republicans will of course loudly blame Biden for this even though they are just as guilty of overreach as the other side of the aisle. Biden may well have to sacrifice Blinken as the pawn guilty of losing the game.

Anyway, neither will help him to get reelected.

It is, by the way, not just a coincidence that Israel, on the same day of the U.S. admission of defeat, got whacked by fighters of the Palestinian resistance. This is another of those U.S.-sponsored global problems that China is eager to solve.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public..


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




JEFF J. BROWN’S END OF CHINA TRIP IMPRESSIONS. (Video w. transcript, and podcast).

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Jeff J. Brown



JEFF J. BROWN’S END OF CHINA TRIP IMPRESSIONS. JB WEST AND JB EAST PRESENT: SEE YOU IN THE HAGUE! #55

 


Video:


Audio podcast (download at the bottom of this page).

........................................................


TRANSCRIPT: James Bradley (Host): Hello, this is James Bradley. JB East in Asia, in Saigon, Vietnam, Ho Chi Minh City. It’s Thursday, May 25th, and JB West Jeff J. Brown is if you’re looking for him out there, in Normandy, he’s not there. He’s still in China. And he just called me. He said, let’s do the second half of this China report. Jeff Brown, where are you?

Jeff J Brown (Guest): In Shenzhen, across the border north of Hong Kong.

James: All right. We got a report from Shenzhen. And take it away. What’s going on? China. I heard of it. There are a few people living there. Let’s do a personal and then let’s do like a macro global country overview.

Jeff: Well, if we want to get into the personal. I have been to Shenzhen. I went to Zhuhai where I met Metallicman, an American journalist who is member of the China Writers’ Group (CWG). And then I went up to see Amir Khan in Changsha in Hunan, Mao Zedong’s home province, a Canadian professor at Hunan University which is very close to Wuhan, by the way.

And so, I’ve really gotten to see a little bit of the country. I forgot how solicitous the Chinese are, how helpful they are, how motherly they are and it can drive foreigners crazy because they’re very interjecting. If you’re doing something, they want to help you. And so, they kind of get in your face to help you. This really upsets a lot of foreigners because they’re really sucked into you know, me, myself, and I the Marlboro Man mentality that I’m going to do it myself. I learned years ago, just let them do it. They mean no harm. They’re not insulting me. They’re not telling me that I don’t know what I’m doing. They just want to help.

The honesty of the people is absolute on the daily street level. I have taken a number of pictures. I was walking in front of a pharmacy and the driver the delivery truck was inside the pharmacy checking off a checklist of all the medicine in the box.

He left the back doors of the van wide open, chockablock full of other boxes of medicine. China has antidepressants. China has codeine. China has painkillers. China has mood enhancers. China has all the Western drugs that we have. And could you imagine what would happen if that truck were in New York City or even Oklahoma City? It would be absolutely ransacked in minutes. Nobody here is locking their electric motorbikes. Half the people aren’t locking their bicycles.

My wife asked me to sell a little bit of gold that she has. So, I took it to a place and it was up on the third floor and I just take the elevator up to the third floor. The service window, the window is just a thin sheet of glass. There’s an opening of about 40 or 50cm under the glass where you hand people the gold. And I was sitting there watching this. There’s no guard, there’s no guns, there’s no security, there’s no metal detectors, there’s none of that. And I was standing there and I even took a picture of it. A guy was sitting there holding eight one-kilogram ingots of gold.

Jeff: I mean, that is what I don’t know how many. Maybe James can do the math. What a kilo of gold is worth? And then next to him was a guy with bags and bags and Ziploc bags and bags of gold. No one’s worried about it. No one is taking anything. And behind that ridiculously thin sheet of plexiglass is probably millions of dollars’ worth of gold. This is a gold dealer. The only thing that was stopping anybody from getting in behind where the workers were working, receiving, and selling gold was just a little lock code thing on the door.

And the door was made out of wood. I mean, that would be completely overrun with machine gun-toting animals in the West in a matter of minutes. And there are just so many other anecdotes that I can just give you, but those are just a few of them. Just on a personal level, the food is unbelievable. The food is very affordable just like in Vietnam, you can eat like a king or a queen for very little money if you’re willing to go to local restaurants.

I had roast duck for ¥23. That’s €3 or $3 for roast duck and an entire plate with vegetables and soup a slab of roast duck for $3. Soups cost $2. I found a swimming pool. The people are lovely. If you accept the way the Chinese are, they are somewhat like I say, interjecting. They’re always trying to help you if you just let them do it. And they love to laugh and they love to talk. And of course, I speak Chinese. And so, I get sort of extra care extra attention. On a personal note, the only people that I have found that are a little bit disgruntled are the Shenzhen taxi drivers.

They already had 70,000 drivers before COVID. And I avoided the metro so that I can be above ground. And I’ve been all over the city and the taxis they’re so cheap, it’s affordable. And they explained to me, I mean, I’ve met people from like up by the Russian border down here, Hunan down here, Anhui down here. Basically, their businesses, their businesses up there went belly up during COVID.

And so, I think the economic impact of COVID here is greater at least for the small and medium businesses than we might realize. But anyway, they were put out of business and so they no longer had jobs. And so, they’re going to Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, which is the capital of Canton, or Guangdong, Shenzhen, and other larger cities. And they’re going into the taxi business. And so, they rent a taxi for ¥10,000/month. They find a tiny room like I’m living in for 1,000 RMB a month. And they have just bloated the fleet of taxis in Shenzhen.

So business is really down. And I talked to one guy. He works 16 hours a day. He takes one day off. His wife cleans houses in Guangzhou. You know, a 30-minute high-speed rail train away comes over on the seventh day to keep the taxi going. I met another guy. And why are they down here? Well, they both got fired from a hotel up in the northeast. And they’ve got three kids in college back in Hunan. And so, they’re basically working 100-hour weeks, both of them, to get their three kids through college in Hunan.

They’re hard-working. When they rest, they rest. But when they work, they work hard, just like the Vietnamese. It’s a very typical sort of East Asian mentality. And they were complaining and grumbling. The business is not good. I only met one real grouch. I mean, one real grouch, a younger guy who was kind of had like a beatnik look. And he was mad at everybody. He was mad at the world. He was mad at his government. He was mad at his life as taxi driver. He was mad at his prospects.

And it was like I was talking to Victoria Nuland or John Bolton. I think he may have a VPN and get onto Voice of America or the Voice of Asia. He was really, that’s the one guy I’ve met who was just really bent out of shape and they were slaves. And he is really an outlier. They’re very Confucian here. They’re very Daoist here. They’re very Buddhist here. And this is my situation and I’m going to work my way through it. And they may grumble a little bit, but you don’t hear anybody wanting to commit suicide or start a crime wave.

They’re just working through it. I’ve met other people who are doing different jobs housekeepers, and masseuses. They’re down here and they’re down here because the pay is better than where they were. And these are all farmers. These are all people from farms. They’re struggling. They’re making 4,000 or 5,000 a month yuan. I mean, that’s like, I don’t know, $400 a month. I mean, it’s nothing. But they usually get a free apartment at that rate and lunch provided to them. But they’re barely scraping by.

But they’re saving enough money that they’re trying to get their kids through school, trying to get their kids through college. I met a masseuse. She’s down here with her daughter who’s going to college to get a degree in Web Design. And her husband is back up near the Korean border with her husband and their two younger sons. And that’s another thing that they do a lot here. There are a lot of separated couples because they have to in order to make the money, they need to realize their dreams.

And she told me that she’s making 5,000 yuan. Her daughter is making 4,000 working a night job as a security guard and then going to college during the day to get a degree in Web Design. And then she said, as soon as my daughter gets her degree, I’ll go back up to Liaoning, which is right next to Korea, North Korea, of course, and to be back with my two sons, 12 and eight years old. So, families here split up when they need to. Parents split up and share child care roles when they need to when it comes to, again, putting food on the table and paying the bills.

However, when you ask them of course they’re struggling here, it’s not easy. The cost of living is obviously much higher than in their rural area. But then you find out, well, they’re farmers. And so, in China, farmers, almost every farmer in China has a nice house now. So, this lady who’s struggling is sitting there saying, yeah. I said, well, tell me about your house up in Liaoning. And she said, oh, it’s 180m², which is 1,800 square feet. And she said that’s for my husband and my two sons live. And that’s where I’ll go back to when my daughter graduates.

And she says, we also have a little 30 square meter, a 300 foot like an efficiency house. And we rent that out. And, they have 1,300 square meters of land. So, every farmer has 1,300 square meters of land where they can grow vegetables and fruit and raise a pig and chickens. And so, it looks bad for them. And they are struggling here in the big city, Changsha was no different for the taxi drivers. But they go back home and even though they may live far away from a big city, they have a very nice life back home with a house.

Many of them have two houses like this lady from Liaoning. And so long term. I want to say if China goes to war with NATO. But I think it’s when. Those people can always go back to their hometowns and they’ve got a house and 1,300 square meters of farmland to grow vegetables and raised chickens and pigs. So, and it’s just like James always talks about when times get tough in Vietnam, in Vietnam, well, the people in the big cities, they go up into the mountains and the hills back into their villages where they can do more than just survive. They can actually lead a decent life.

So those are just some of my personal impressions. I would like to say that just on a personal level, Xi Jinping is an absolute rock star here. I mean, people love him. And I know this probably upsets Westerners because they can’t believe that anybody would love Xi Jinping. But if you had a leader like Xi Jinping, you would love him, too. I mean, he will go down in Chinese history as the Mao Zedong of the 21st century. And also, I heard nobody say anything bad about Mao. I would mention Mao to some people. And they just were like they didn’t care. But nobody was trashing Mao and Mao is very venerated here.

James: Jeff.

Jeff: Yeah. Yeah.

James: What about Xi? You said Xi is popular. Like what quotes do you have or why are people talking about Xi? About their shoes or about his deal with Russia? I mean, in what context have you had people talk about Xi?

Jeff: James, Xi has done something that even Mao couldn’t do. Mao had seven national campaigns against corruption, all during his reign from 1949 to 1976. None of them really ever worked. Well, yeah, it did work. The Cultural Revolution solved all the corruption. But he has done something that no other leader in modern China and even ancient China has been able to do, and that is he has crushed corruption here. He has absolutely crushed it. And I have talked to people here who say that they were able to do things before Xi Jinping.

They can’t do that now. He has gone after the casual corruption. He has gone after the big corruption. And, of course, it’s still there. But especially at the local level, you’re not going to get rid of all of it. But he has literally torn a new backside into big tech here. You know, Alibaba, Tencent, and WeChat, DiDi. the taxi hire company. All the big tech companies have been literally kneecapped by Xi Jinping and have been brought back down to earth.

They will never be Facebook, Instagram, Google, or Twitter basically controlling the Democratic Party and huge parts of the Deep state apparatus. He has gone after just everybody. And his social credit system is adored by people here, as I mentioned because it goes after the bad guys. It exposes them and there are consequences. So that’s why they love him. He has really cleaned up China, especially in the military. It was extremely corrupt before he came into office in 2012.

And he was an officer before he became president and his wife was an officer before becoming the first lady. They have and continue to use their moral authority to literally just wipe the People’s Liberation Army clean of corruption. And so, the buying and selling of generalships and the buying and selling off of division posts and all that and all the corruption with land deals and everything. That’s all gone now. And you can see it. I mean the economy is humming without corruption. They say a little bit can be sort of a lubricant.

But Xi has shown that if you have virtually no corruption, you don’t need that lubricant. The economy is just hopping and humping and moving and developing. And it’s already much bigger than the US economy and much bigger than the EU economy in purchasing power parity terms. And next year, I think it’s already now going to even surpass them in exchange rate terms. So that’s why he’s so popular.

James: So, if you’re listening to American media, a throwaway line is the BBC, FBI, and NSA surveillance. All they want is to make us like China. China is the worst-case scenario. They’re trying to make us like China with a social credit score. The people are completely controlled. We don’t want to be like China. I mean, that’s just a given in any channel of American media. Just a throwaway line that the credit score is a rope around the Chinese people’s necks and the government is using it to just whip the horses to pull the government chariot. Those poor Chinese people. So why such a divergence here and what would your comment on that be?

Jeff: Well, the thing is, is that this is deflective psychology or reflective psychology because it’s the West that has the panopticon totalitarian system. We know that Google and Facebook and Instagram and Twitter are vacuuming every piece, every iota of information on us being stored in massive computer towns and the deserts of Utah. We know that not only Americans’ information and Europeans’ information but everybody’s information around the world.

This is so difficult for Westerners to understand but China has the most consensual consultative democracy in the world, at least in terms of a big country. Every law is posted online. Back in the days of Mao, those laws were posted on village boards. People could look at the laws and then they would survey them. The government is the biggest surveyor in the world, and they did it back during Mao’s time when it was called the mass line.

What do the people think? And we need to respect the people. And it’s hard to believe that there’s actually a big government like China that actually listens to its citizens, not like ours. And so, this social credit system was demanded by the people because they were sick and tired of the 80s and 90s all the street-level criminality and all the distrust and the cheating and the scamming and the street crime and the burglaries.

And they were just sick of it because that was Deng Xiaoping’s era of street level capitalism and the country was not a nice place to live in and I know because we lived here for seven years in the 1990s so they demanded it. It has been modified. It has been amended. It has been added too based on the desires of the people. The people can go online, they can go into their local, they can go into their village or neighborhood government office and give their opinion about this.

The social credit score system is a creation of the people of China and it is all above board. It is all public. There’s nothing being hidden. And in fact, the people got so pissed off when they found out that Didi and Tencent, WeChat and Alibaba and JD.com, and all these massive, these massive tech companies were basically they were abusing their personal data just like they do in the United States. Of course, we have no control over it. They’re going to do it anyway.

But here there was such public outrage when they found out that they were abusing their personal information. They essentially shut down Didi for a year and a half. They arrested Jack Ma of Alibaba and made it essentially a state corporation. How do you want to say it? The state is on top of Alibaba. It’s not owned by the state, but there’s essentially a government official at Alibaba watching everything they do. Tencent, WeChat the world’s biggest video gaming company. Again, they were chopped down.

They were fined, heavily fined, and punished for sharing information, laws that the people were demanding were immediately passed to strictly, strictly control the use of their personal information, the use of their images from cameras and from ID photos and passport photos. That is all in place here in China. It’s not in place in the United States. We don’t know. Everything you put on Facebook, they own it. Everything you put on Instagram, they own it. Everything you put on Twitter, they own it.

Everything you put, Google is vacuuming everything. That’s not China. China has an open public security system. And the people have gotten what they wanted, which is an extremely short leash on big tech, and that includes Huawei and ZTE and China Mobile and China Unicom, and the other telephone companies. They’re all well, those are all state-owned. There are people-owned. The banks are on a short leash. The government here is not taking any chances with these entities, private or public, getting too big for their britches and becoming another Facebook or Twitter.

James: Okay. That’s cool. That’s cool. Then you said something interesting. You said when NATO fights China or when war with NATO comes. What do you mean by that?

Jeff: Everything I have come up with here in the last three weeks, of course, I was shut out of China for three years because the country was completely shut down for foreigners to get in except under extreme circumstances. And the Chinese couldn’t leave for three years. And these are foreigners who I’m talking to because the Chinese would be a little bit reluctant to talk about it. But the consensus is, is that the Chinese government, who I call Baba Beijing, knows they were attacked in Wuhan at the World Military Games in October of 2019 (https://chinarising.puntopress.com/search/?q=soy%20sauce).

And they used that biological weapon attack by the United States military during the World Military Games to launch a massive civil defense exercise. And so, that’s what happened here. And I talk to people, and it was a lot more brutal than I thought. I mean, it was tough, man. I was talking to people and what they had to go through, movements of people and stuff. And people not being able to leave, et cetera, especially in Shanghai.

I think they were trying a lot of different ways for civil defense, and I think they were using COVID as a way to prepare for the coming war with NATO. And I think that they know that and even the US is so arrogant. They’ve even alluded to it that they are developing gene marker bioweapons for Han Chinese people, Slavic, Russian people, et cetera. And they’ll use Taiwan, I think just to attack China and just like they’re using Ukraine to attack Russia. And I think though they know that this time it’s going to be a really serious biological weapon that has Chinese gene markers.

And of course, I’ve reported... I did a whole expose on the fact that Harvard back in the 1990s illegally stole and collected (https://chinarising.puntopress.com/2020/02/25/harvard-illegally-collected-dna-samples-in-china-throughout-the-90s-right-up-to-sars-lies-upon-lies-and-many-cover-ups-have-kept-this-criminal-conduct-hidden-in-plain-sight-looks-like-bio-engineere/). They don’t even know it’s somewhere in the hundreds of thousands, maybe up to 2 million respiratory DNA samples from Chinese, from Han Chinese, their sinuses, their throats, and their bronchial tubes. And it could be up to 2 million. They don’t know how many. And those were all those who disappeared and likely ended up in Fort Detrick., which is the world’s biggest biological warfare production facility.

So, I think that they will be ready. And the three years here were tough. I mean I was talking to people but you know what? They never forced one person to get any vaccines. I know Chinese who didn’t get vaccinated. I know Westerners who didn’t get vaccinated. They never pushed anybody to get vaccinated. You were not required to do so. And so, when the United States does attack China with probably a gene-specific bioweapon, say, before, I think it’s going to happen maybe before 2025 generals are already talking about that.

US NATO generals are always talking about we need to be prepared by 2025. When they sequestered 58 million people around Wuhan and organized all that and made it happen immediately after the Military World Games. And they discovered COVID as it was spreading. They will be able to do that if needed for 1.5 billion people, citizens, to keep them from being wiped out by a much, much more dangerous, much, much more lethal bioweapon that the United States, I would say, likely is developing and will have ready for their war with China, because there is no other way that they can beat China in a hot war.

So, I think they’re going to try to do it. And probably Russia, too. I think they’ve already been caught getting Slavic DNA all across Russia, and the United States, through NGOs. So, I think that’s why. And so that civil defense exercise went on for three years. It caused a lot of hardship here. And again, I’ve talked to Chinese, and a lot of businesses went under thousands of businesses, small and medium-sized businesses went under. It was not a happy time for the Chinese.

But I think that the Baba Beijing knew they had to do it to practice and to find out what works, to keep the people from being wiped out by an upcoming bioweapon attack much, much worse than the Military World Games in Wuhan in 2019. So, I think that’s what’s going on. And it’s I think it’s bound to happen. And China will be ready. They’ve got three years of experience under their belt. Another thing I do want to point out is, is that I have talked to people.

And even though China’s vaccines are the good old fashioned attenuated virus the good old fashioned like the smallpox attenuated virus type vaccines, not the genetic modification, the gene therapy, the mRNA like in the West. But people here are saying that the health of the people is not as good as it was. So, it just goes to show you that no vaccine, no matter how safe you try to make it, it can be administered to a large population without there being some consequences.

People here are talking about what they call long COVID and people apparently there are a lot more cancers now here. They don’t have all the heart problems, the myocarditis and pericarditis and the heart attacks and the paralysis and all that. But apparently, most of the Chinese, I talk to you got a total of three shots. And also fatigue just the long COVID fatigue. So even China, with the best of intentions and knowing the classic vaccines, have apparently there are apparently some repercussions from vaccinating most of the population.

And I can tell you, James, how impactful COVID was. I have seen Westerners would call it propaganda. Of course, this is good propaganda. Not the propaganda in the West that is to demonize others and starts wars and gets people to hate each other. These are like public service announcements, but especially Shenzhen and then also Zhuhai and less so Changsha is literally blanketed with public service posters saying things like go see a psychologist or a psychiatrist, balance work and rest, be healthy, balanced, eating, respect standing in line, don’t spit on the ground, which hasn’t been a problem here for 20 years. Let transform (update) social traditions.

Take the pressure off yourself. Fine-tune yourself. Don’t use products harmful to health. Develop specialty item processes. In other words, do research and development, get exercise, communicate with others, and separate the garbage. This is like classic Confucianism and Daoism. And it’s absolutely you cannot turn your head in any direction without seeing one of these posters. So, I think they’re really trying to I would say protect and help each other, like old Confucians.

We take care of those who need our help, Confucian aphorisms and all kinds about how to be a good husband, how to be a good wife, how to be a good family, how to be a good worker, how to be a good society, how to be good at what to do at school. They also have the 12 Core Socialist Values and they’re just plastered everywhere. I’ve never seen a propaganda campaign like what I have seen in Shenzhen. It is really, really, really intense. And I think it just shows that they realize that the people did go through a lot during COVID. And now they’re helping the people to do what they need to do post-COVID, so to speak.

James: What about all the lockdowns and the people singing at night and we don’t have food and the films of the officials killing the dogs and dragging the people and locking up apartments? I mean, it was it looked pretty brutal. A lot of those lockdowns. And you say nobody was coerced to get a shot.

Jeff: Well, first off, it’s hard to know how many of those films that you saw are real. I mean, I know that Shanghai was really brutal. It was tough. And I think that was where they were pushing civil defense to its absolute maximum. It’s difficult to say. I mean, I have seen so many of these video clips and then they show later that, well, that’s not real. That actually happened in Burma in the 80s or Indonesia in the 90s or so. I don’t know. But I do know that it was tough and the government did everything it could to get food provided, et cetera.

But to be honest with you, with George Soros and USAID and NED and the CIA and the FBI and everybody that the Democratic Party apparatus that hates China or the Republican apparatus that hates China, it’s the Democrats that hate Russia. It’s difficult to see to know for sure whether those clips were legitimate or not. But I can tell you that that the people had a tough time and people did tell me towards the end there were people starting to protest.

And but unlike in the United States, I don’t know, the government here would not come out shooting and tear-gassing and all that. I mean, there were protests. They protested and they were listened to. But it’s funny at the same time, James, I think the people were so worried about a biological warfare attack that towards the end, national polls showed that 82% of the people wanted to keep the measures because they were so afraid of getting killed.

So, when you’ve been attacked by bioweapons since 1935 by the Japanese and then the Americans in Korea and China and in SARS in 2003 and then COVID from 2019 to 2023, plus multiple US attacks with swine fever, avian flu all across the country, wiping out the poultry and swine herds across the country. When you’ve endured that, you really look at things differently. But that’s all I can say. I saw some of those videos and they’re fuzzy.

There’s not a lot you can see. And the CIA has plenty of studios all around the world in Hong Kong, the CIA has hundreds of agents in Hong Kong. They’re in Taiwan. Unfortunately, they can make that stuff up. But anyway, it’s over now. People seem to have gotten over it and very, very few people wear a mask here except. Well, not many people are wearing masks anymore and people are getting on with their lives. And the government’s saying go see a psychiatrist. So, if you’re depressed or whatever, get some help.

James: So, why don’t we wrap it up, you’re going to sleep in Shenzhen tonight. And then when are you going to be back on the Atlantic Coast?

Jeff: I’ll be back on Sunday. I’m going to go to an international conference tomorrow in Hong Kong, which I wasn’t supposed to, which is not why I came here. Just I happen to know someone who is going to it, about Chinese labor. And he said, yeah, come along. So, I’m going to go to that tomorrow night and Saturday, and then I’ll leave Sunday. But I would like to close it out. I do want to bring up a couple of two or three other salient points.

And I know we’re over 40 minutes. But first, China has gone completely cashless. There is almost no money left in this country. It’s all electronic using WeChat and Alipay. I know Westerners are freaked out by the central bank digital currency, and they should be because their banks are evil and corrupt, and genocidal, whereas the banks here are owned by the people. So, the people here don’t fear the banks, nor do they fear 5G.

I mean, I’m sure 5G could be used for all kinds of evil purposes, but they’re not going to use it for evil purposes here. So, everybody’s gone cashless. The other thing that’s really just the continuing infrastructure just it’s everywhere. They’re just building and building. It’s just breathtaking. And metros and skyscrapers and highways and rail lines and it just nonstop airports and train stations and Metallicman in Zhuhai used the word when I interviewed him and he said that China is a colossus.

And I would like to close out our discussion today, James, accepting the fact that China is on a scale like nothing that the world has ever seen, the Western imperial powers got the best of China from the first Opium War until 1949. But for 5,000 years, China has been the giant of human civilization. And it’s back and antidote to Western imperialism and Western trying defeat it is communism and socialism. I know this really upsets people.

And Vietnam’s doing the same thing. But to see what a big, powerful country, a communist-socialist country like China is doing for their people and the prosperity that they are creating and the development and the civilization and the society and really working day and night to improve the lives of the people. They’re building millions of low-income apartments. They’re still doing it. And if the West is the Earth, then China is the rest of the solar system, including the Sun.

And it is just so beyond our scope. It is so beyond our imagination just how massively powerful and successful China is since 1949 and for much of the last 5,000 years. We need to accept it. And China is in a class all by itself. So, I’m looking forward to coming back in August and I’m going to come back in October and I’m going to try to come back every couple, every two or three months and go to different parts of the country and continue to be your eyes and the fans’ eyes and ears on the ground here in China. Thank you, James.

James: That’s really cool. Okay. We’ll leave it there. Unless you have something else. I mean, that’s a lot and very valuable insight. So good luck in Hong Kong. And then let’s do a final follow-up when you get back to the West and you can look at China from afar.

Jeff: Okay, yeah. I’m afraid almost to go back. I’m afraid I’m going to be so disappointed. But yeah, we’ll do one. It’ll be interesting.

James: Yeah. Let’s see what your impressions are after you leave and look at it from a distance.

Jeff: Thank you, James. You’re a great host.

James: Okay. JB West signing off to JB East this time. But really, JB West Jeff J. Brown.

Jeff: Bye-bye, James.

James: Thanks. Bye.

PODCAST


To see all our shows:

Categories: Baba Beijing, Beijing, china, China history, China Is Communist, China Rising, China Tech News Flash!, China-European relations, China-Russia Relations, China-US relations, Chinese culture, Communist Party of China, CPC, Deep State, Fundraising, Interview, JB West and JB East present: See You in The Hague!, Jeff J. Brown, Podcast, Radio Sinoland, US Empire

ABOUT JEFF BROWN

JEFF J. BROWN, Senior Editor & China Correspondent,  Dispatch from Beijing

Jeff J. Brown is a geopolitical analyst, journalist, lecturer and the author of The China Trilogy. It consists of 44 Days Backpacking in China - The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass (2013); Punto Press released China Rising - Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations (2016); and for Badak Merah, Jeff authored China Is Communist, Dammit! – Dawn of the Red Dynasty (2017).
Jeff can be reached at China Rising, jeff@brownlanglois.com, Facebook, Twitter and Wechat/Whatsapp: +86-13823544196.

• For Jeff J Brown’s Books, Radio Sinoland & social media outlets be sure to check this page on his special blog CHINA RISING RADIO SINOLAND

The battle against the Big Lie killing the world will not be won by you just reading this article. It will be won when you pass it on to at least 2 other people, requesting they do the same.

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]f you find China Rising Radio Sinoland's work useful and appreciate its quality, please consider making a donation. Money is spent to pay for Internet costs, maintenance, the upgrade of our computer network, and development of the site.
Just use the donation button below (yes, click on Sylvester the Kitty)—OR, just as easy, SCAN our QR code!





 

 

 

 Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


 

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
It’s super easy! Sign up to receive our FREE bulletin.  Get TGP selections in your mailbox. No obligation of any kind. All addresses secure and never sold or commercialised. 

[newsletter_form]