Godfree Roberts discusses his book, “Why China Leads the World” and five things the Chinese are doing that affect your life.

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Jeff J. Brown


Note: The actual interview begins at approx. 09:57.


China Rising Radio Sinoland 230329

Intro
Godfree’s numerous interviews and articles on China Rising Radio Sinoland can be found here, https://chinarising.puntopress.com/search/?q=godfree

Godfree’s newsletter, https://www.herecomeschina.com/ 
His newly updated book, Why China Leads the World: Talent at the Top, Data in the Middle, Democracy from the Bottom, https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08Q9PN8SV?ref_=pe_3052080_276849420

Brighteon video does not censor and supports free speech, so please subscribe and watch here.


Transcript:

Jeff J Brown (Host): Good morning, everybody. This is Jeff J Brown China Rising Radio Sinoland on the D-Day beaches of Normandy. And my show’s most popular guest, Godfree Roberts, is on today. How are you doing, Godfree?

Godfree Roberts (Guest): Very well. Thank you, Jeff.

Jeff: Godfree and I go back years. He has been on my show more than anyone else. This will probably be the 10th or 11th show, maybe even the 12th show. I’d have to go back and count. And for all the fans out there, we became good friends. We were good friends before my wife and I moved to Chiangmai in 2019, right before the COVID lockdown. And Godfree was nice enough to get us settled into Chiangmai, where he lives. And unfortunately, we went to France in the summer of 2020 and could never go back.

So, we’re retired here now and which is fine. The cheese is good, the wine is good, the bread is good and it’s beautiful Normandy, impressionist art. So, anyway, we are going to get back now that the floodgates, so to speak, for tourism have opened up. We really look forward to going back and having some good Thai food with Godfree. We’ve got two other friends who are members of the China Writers Group who are there… Eric Arnow and Richard… I’m having a brain burp, Richard. Anyway, he hasn’t commented in quite a while. But, Godfree, you look healthy and happy.

Godfree: I feel it. Yes, I’m thriving here.

Jeff: Beautiful Chiangmai. Well, the last time we had our show and it’s been too long, but the last time I just pro-offered Godfree his “Here Comes China Newsletter” which is wonderful (https://www.herecomeschina.com/). And I will put that in there. He has his new book, the updated book…

Godfree: “China Leads The World”.

Jeff: Yeah, “China Leads The World”. He’s updated it from 2020. He now has the 2023 edition (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08Q9PN8SV?ref_=pe_3052080_276849420). And so anyway, I’ll put the link for that also. The last time I just said since he and I are both old China hands, I said Godfree, looking in your crystal ball, what are five things about China that most Westerners don’t know about and need to know about? So, what’s the first one, Godfree?

Godfree: I think the first one is how heavily China is enmeshed in the world. How broadly and how deeply we hear about the Belt and Road occasionally, but that’s about it. But that’s one of a dozen equally enormous, very powerful networks. For example, one physical network that fascinates me is called the Global Energy Interconnection (GEI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Energy_Interconnection). It uses renewable energy and moves electricity around the globe with the sun from one country to the next.

Now, that’s a nice idea, you’d think, but already they’ve spent 15 trillion with a T on this thing, and it’s already starting to kick in big time, shuttling hydropower from Russia to Japan, Japan’s nuclear energy to South Korea. Russia is connected to Iran at one end of the network and to China at the other. And Africa is being hooked up. It’s an enormous project. And China, the founder, and the director is the founder, of course, the director of State Grid.

Jeff: The largest utility in the world, electric grid in China. We used to be their customers. We were their customer for years. And they provide great service. And it was cheap.

Godfree: Yes.

Jeff: So, it’s called the Global Energy Interconnection?

Godfree: Yeah.

Jeff: 15 trillion US or 15 trillion Renminbi?

Godfree: US.

Jeff: Wow. That’s incredible.

Godfree: Big bucks. It’s come from a lot of consolidation and buy-ins but the capital value that they put together is already 15 trillion. But when it’s done man, it’s automatic. Put the damn thing on automatically.

Jeff: Maybe that’s one of the reasons Saudi Arabia is deciding to look east and has come to a peaceful reconciliation with Iran to extend that electric grid into Saudi Arabia, because I know they’re doing everything they can to try to wean themselves off of oil for their energy, because they know one day they will run out. And so, they’re looking for solar, nuclear, and other ways to have adequate energy into the 21st century. But we’ll look into that. I did not know that one. I’m really glad to hear about that. What about India? What about Southeast Asia? Are they getting into it or the DPRK?

Godfree: Southeast Asia is already totally into it. They’re doing it and connecting it. And it’s quite a lively scene here. And it’s everyone’s kind of accepting it because the railway sort of, okay, as long as we’re connecting with the railway, we may as well connect our grids. And as long as you’ve got a dam that produces more electricity than you need it saves us building a coal plant.

Jeff: Yeah. And then also, just like back in the old days when the United States was stretching railroads from the East Coast to the West Coast of the United States, of course, 15 to 18 million Native Americans paid the price. But as long as they were running that rail line all the way out to Saint Louis and then to Denver and then to San Francisco, they were able to run the telegraph lines right alongside the rail lines. And I’m sure as long as they’re clearing space for the rail line to come from Kunming in China down to Bangkok, they’ll probably be able to run a high-tension line along the rail line. All right. Well, that’s really interesting. What about anybody in Europe taking a bite at it, or are they being vastly suppressed by Uncle Slaughter?

Godfree: They’re being suppressed, of course. But, I mean, that was the whole point of the pipeline attacks, to decouple them. It’s an interesting gamble. I don’t think America is going to be able to pull it off. I think they’re going to lose Europe. I heard a rumor the other day that 500 billionaires from China that are the ones who are members of the Communist Party are being circulated around Europe sponsoring everything and endowing colleges and saying to the old money in Europe, listen, you’re going to get a much better deal from us, than you will from Uncle Sam, because those are the people. If anyone can save Europe, it’s them.

Jeff: Yeah, absolutely. I just heard read the absurd article where the US is just beating Germany, just beating Germany to a pulp to remove 80,000 Huawei 5G telephone towers and replace them with more expensive, inferior Nokia towers or Ericsson towers. And it’s going to cost 3 billion US to remove the 80,000 towers that are bigger, better, faster, and cheaper, and then spend another 5 billion US to replace the 80,000 Huawei towers that are superior.

This is just like poor Europe. They’ve got to purge their halls of power of all these fifth columnists who the United States has just infected the European woodwork in the halls of power here, with all these Washington sympathizers, because otherwise living here, I can tell you it’s just going to keep getting worse and worse. So, point number two, Godfree, take it away.

Godfree: Number two is computing, which we’re told China is inferior in, particularly thanks to the embargoes. But I think that’s misleading. The Chinese manufacture more chips than anybody on earth. Anyway, already half of the foundries in the world, the new foundries are in China more than 50%. One of them is an optronics foundry, the first commercial industrial optronics foundry that builds, instead of using moving electrons, uses light.

Jeff: Is Huawei involved in that?

Godfree: Not as far as I know.

Jeff: I saw an article that said that they were into optical chips.

Godfree: Oh, I’m sure they are. I mean, they’re into this high-tech, but this is a foundry. This is like a TSMC building. That’s all it does. It doesn’t have in fact it’s 100% Chinese IP. So, no patent problems, and no embargoes. It’s much cooler, it’s cooler, uses less power, and runs quicker. So, we can already see that when Xi announced publicly in 2015 that chips computer chips would be a bottleneck….

You can bet your bottom dollar that they’d been working on that for years before he made that announcement. That wasn’t. It’s not like America where they get up and make a grand announcement and then years later some funding comes through and something happens. No, they were already on top of it. So, we’re starting to see that pay off now. Another example. Do you remember when China took the lead in supercomputers and had the fastest?

Jeff: I’ve written about it.

The Chinese Navy (PLAN) already outpaces the US Navy in tonnage and rate of construction. China's first home-designed and built nuclear carrier may enter service as early as 2026. Contrary to Western imperialist navies, which focus on projecting power, especially the US, Beijing's ships are tasked with protecting the motherland. Their role is primarily defensive. (TGP screenshots) 

 

Godfree: What happened was there was an immediate embargo on high-speed Intel chips to stop that. So, anyway, a few years went by and China produced the fastest computer in the world, only built entirely with Chinese chips and everything.

Jeff: Oh, absolutely. I reported on it.

Godfree: Yeah. So, this latest throttling of the embargoes coincides with a point to a problem that America has created for itself with these embargoes. China immediately went dark on supercomputing. That’s the last we ever heard of them was that time.

Jeff: When they broke the world record.

Godfree: Yeah, with 100%.

Jeff: Yeah. The Tianhe supercomputer.

Godfree: Yeah. Well, here’s the update, and here’s the consequence. China just installed its fourth exascale computer, complete with software. It’s building six more. One for each of the ten computing centers. All of them are joined with lightning-fast connections so they’ll function as one gigantic centrally controllable supercomputer, ten times bigger than anything America has ever had. But they’re not going to talk about it, because we’ll just try to mess with it. So, we’re losing. We’re falling behind and not knowing it. I mean, you’ve seen the signs. 5G is way ahead. There’s a lot of stuff like that.

Jeff: Yeah, of course, Germany is not as big as China, but in fact, I was surprised that Germany actually had 80,000 5G towers. But I can’t remember how many hundreds of thousands of 5G towers China has, but I think every.

Godfree: It has 2 million.

Jeff: Yeah, 2 million. And virtually every province, every county, and at least the county township, they have 5G across the entire country including Xinjiang and Tibet and Qinghai and Ningxia, and inner Mongolia, these unpopulated areas, all have 5G. And we don’t here in France, 5G is just almost unheard of here. We just got fiber. We just got fiber. 2023. Woo! We finally got fiber. And there are still provincial cities in France that still don’t have fiber.

They’re still using ADSL fax phones and copper wire phone lines like fax lines in the 1980s for their Internet. And we know because for two years we lived with it. When we first got here it took, I would upload a show like ours. I’d go to bed at 10:00, start uploading it and pray that it had been uploaded by the time I woke up in the morning. And that was in France up until just a few months ago. And 5G, forget it. Don’t even know about it here.

Godfree: That’s very interesting, isn’t it? It’s kind of all these little data points. All suggest one thing, drifting away for losing touch, for not caring.

Jeff: For the people, not caring for the people.

Godfree: It’s going nowhere, really.

Jeff: Caring for the 1% but not the 99%. So, profit over people. That’s the difference. And of course, in China, it’s people over profit. So, of course, people go, oh, that’s not true. They’re just as evil. They’re just as bad. No, they’re not. I’m sorry. They’re not. It’s different. So, I wonder if those ten supercomputer centers, I don’t know if the technology advanced enough but of course, China is way, way, way ahead of everybody, Europe and the United States on quantum communication, using quantum satellites and quantum lines. Do you know if those supercomputers are going to be quantum-ly hooked up or if it going to be good old fashioned? For those computers, they probably need a fiber cable about 30 or 40cm in diameter.

Godfree: I think they’re going to be kept separate. It looks like quantum computers have at the moment rather limited applications. But its communications have got the best security in the world. Speaking of which. That’s another thing that people don’t know is the density and sophistication of China’s military presence in the West Pacific. It’s extraordinary. It’s unbelievable.

There’s barely a cubic meter of the ocean that isn’t monitored sometimes from 2 or 3 different angles. It begins with far-out satellites way, way back, then the nearest satellite has its job to do. Then they have these wing loom, the big drones that stay up for a month at a time. They have a 60-thousand-foot thing that they relay information and they use onboard artificial intelligence in their satellites. They have fishing boats towing sonars.

They have submarine sonar rays anchored to the bottom of the ocean. It just goes on and on and on. They could pick out anything anywhere. And they say, by the way, they actually say that anything that moves in the West Pacific, we know about it. So, it’s an awesome defensive thing to encounter as a military commander imagine facing that and realizing that they had nine different ways of locating you and five different ways of using that to kill you.

Jeff: Yeah, with all the missile technology and hyper gliders and aircraft carrier killers. But what a lot of people don’t know is, is that China has the biggest deep-water navy in the world. And they haven’t even launched their third aircraft carrier group, which is supposed to be launched in June and it’s called the I think instead of His Majesty, Her Majesty’s, whatever HMS thinks it’s CMD or something or CMS. The Fujian is going to be launched. It’s going to be nuclear-powered and it’s another massive aircraft carrier group.

And of course, what’s great about China is all they have to do is just go to Japan and surround Taiwan. And they’re like an armored castle whereas the United States has to haul materials from the Los Angeles and Seattle Ports, which are barely functioning and broken down. And China doesn’t have to go to Hawaii or the Catalina Islands off the coast of Los Angeles to make its point. It just has to defend its own territory. And yeah, also the Coast Guard, they have a massive Coast Guard.

Godfree: Yeah. Yeah.

Jeff: And they have a massive commercial like you said, fishing and transport for regional from coast to coast from like from Fujian down to Xiamen. They’ve got tens of thousands of these boats in the South China Sea. And they are all expected to be ready to fight to defend the country if war is declared. So, the United States would have to, and France and England, for whatever they’re worth in that part of the world. And Australia. Oh, mighty Australia.

They will have the world’s largest military in East Asia, the world’s largest navy, the world’s largest commercial fleet ready to practice war alongside the People’s Liberation Army, and one of the largest coast guards in the world that is also trained to participate and coordinate with the People’s Liberation Army. I mean, I don’t want the war to happen, but I think it would be almost kind of fun to watch to see the United States and Japan and poor South Korea which has no desire to be involved just get absolutely pummeled. But, the scary thing, of course, Godfree, is they might go nuclear to save the day. What do you think?

Godfree: I think if they went nuclear, I think the results would be very much like the ones we see with COVID the same ratio. China would suffer 1% of the casualties for the same reasons we saw with COVID. That was a civil defense drill. The Chinese government knew that COVID-19 wasn’t a particularly lethal virus. For healthy people, it’s not a problem. But they needed a civil defense drill.

They needed to make a statement about who was going to survive and who was not going to survive. You can see that they’ve got their shit together and nobody else does. And they also have the world’s best after Russia including Russia’s S-400 systems. They have superb anti-missile stuff and not like 2 or 3, but hundreds of thousands of them like massive amounts. So, they’ll be fine. America has no defense, no missile defense, whatever, and no civil cohesion.

Jeff: I don’t even know if the US generals and Joe Biden know that since 1961, China and North Korea have had a mutual defense treaty and they just renewed it, agreed to continue it, I think maybe a year or two ago. So that if the United States does get into a physical war with China, they will automatically be in a physical war with North Korea and nobody wants to mess with the North Koreans. I mean, can you imagine 1.2 million North Korean soldiers pouring across the 38th parallel, I mean, into South Korea? I mean, the United States is trying to attack China. And the DPRK has thermonuclear multi-headed intercontinental ballistic missiles that can take out the East Coast of the United States. These people are just unbelievable.

Godfree: It is. That’s the tough bit we all are puzzled about how can they talk like this. Even what’s the percentage where are we going with it? A nuclear war that’s what you want.

Jeff: Yeah, it’s frightening. Unfortunately, I think that’s what they, the old expression, the old poker expression double down. Well, I lost that round. I’m going to double down on this round. So, they’re getting their butts waxed in Ukraine. They’re running out of arms, yet in their absolute megalomania and their narcissism they’re now, I really feel like they’re going to try to do the same thing with China. And it’s just like, God, God help us, God help us, and God, it’s just unbelievable. All right. Next point.

Godfree: The next point is, is way at the other end of the spectrum, and that is the village program that’s ongoing right now. The energy that went into anti-poverty and springing people lost from poverty has been continued, of course, and in fact, is getting more resourced and it is to create village clusters, intra-village specialties, arrange communications and deliveries and pickups, and so forth. Another reason the Chinese are way ahead of us on drones is, is this part of this campaign is to help remote farmers get their fresh duck eggs to Shanghai gourmet restaurants overnight for twice the price that they were getting a month ago.

In essence, the whole program has been done for 100,000 villages with great energy with digital currency available to them directly from the central bank to them. Just put your card in, and you get your sprayer or your tractor will finance that. Making, bringing this reality to life so that they can see each other. They can share weather information from the satellite just a whole bunch of stuff. It’s very intense and it’s huge and it’s invisible for obvious reasons. It’s very down home. It’s there’s nothing to see, really.

Jeff: And of course, Godfree and I both know that in 2013, I think it was, Xi Jinping, the new president who announced the lofty goal of eliminating extreme poverty across the entire country there. And Florence and I saw this when we were driving around and traveling around China, we would see these villages that were let’s face it, they were extremely impoverished. I mean, just hovels and shacks. And I remember we were in Yunnan and we were right on the border with Vietnam and we would see these villages there and I’d say, “That’s one of the villages they’re going to fix”.

And they did. The goal was by 2020 to do it. They did it. They did it. You don’t do it for free. They spend 115 billion US equivalent in RMB to help 90. It was, I can’t remember 80 or 90 million people in the most extreme poverty to bring them up with an acceptable lifestyle. And no other country, no other country could ever imagine doing that. And I am sure that those people are also now benefiting from the village program that you’re talking about.

So, because I know they’ve been trying all kinds of ways to connect, I know they’ve been beating up Alibaba. I know they’ve been beating up JD.com. They’ve been beating up all the commercial platforms that sell stuff like Amazon, but it’s Taobao and JD and Meituan. I know the government has been putting a lot of pressure on these online vendors to work with the farmers to find ways to get their product from the farm directly to the consumer. And I think that must be one of the things that you’re talking about, isn’t it?

Godfree: Yeah, that’s exactly it. And speaking of which, they’ve extended that in interesting ways. I was talking to a Spaniard the other day. He sells Spanish restaurant foods in Thailand as the whole country. And he said he has a ham supplier.

Jeff: Oh, their ham is to die for.

Godfree: And he said they’ve got a deal with it either JD or one of the big ones. As soon as it’s loaded onto JD’s pickup lorry, they shoot the code, they hit the thing. In Spain the driver just hits zaps it and the money appears in the farmer’s account instantly.

Jeff: In Spain?

Godfree: Yeah. Before it’s even left his farm gate.

Jeff: Probably at a higher price than maybe a wholesale in Spain, I don’t know. But even if it’s the same price, they’re better off with the speed of money. Yeah, that’s unbelievable.

Godfree: And on the consumer end, that’s another thing I want to talk about just for a minute. Thailand is in the RCEP – the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership. And it’s set up by ASEAN and China is a member and so are Australia and New Zealand I believe. It’s the largest trading place in the world thing in the world, a huge market and I’m a beneficiary of it. I’ve become addicted to AliExpress, and Alibaba.

Jeff: Yeah, we use it too.

Godfree: Everything I need an electric screwdriver, a retractable dog leash, no problem. And the thing is, they get here in like 72 hours for a third price that I would have paid at home and the freight is like $1.12. That’s it. That’s the deal. Anything you want, anything you can imagine wanting. Electric knife sharpener, I’ve wanted one for years. It was here in three days. It cost 31 bucks. And it works brilliantly.

Jeff: I don’t think Thailand probably has a big enough market, but Europe does. And so, what Alibaba does, which is basically the Taobao outside of China, Taobao is the Amazon of China. And so, they have a separate platform called, for those of you who don’t know, called AliExpress. And everybody should sign up for it. If you’re in France, it’s in French. If you’re in Spain, it’s in Spanish. If you’re in Germany, it’s in German. And so, I have AliExpress in France. And so, I look up stuff.

But a year or so ago, an individual package would arrive from China. And of course, the freight was more expensive. Now they have such a huge volume flooding into France that when I get the package now, it is from the French post office. So, what they’re doing is, they have collection centers. All the AliExpress vendors in China must have collection centers. They’re obviously filling up 40-foot containers with all of these individual orders. They’re arriving probably in Paris or Marseilles. I don’t know where or maybe Le Havre by ship, I don’t know.

It is slow. It does take about a month for it to get here. But now the freight is like nothing. And it’s got a tracking number. And now I know that Alibaba, even has centers here in France for the most popular items and you order them and you get them in three days from Alibaba, from AliExpress. It’s Chinese stuff but they’re actually obviously seeing what the market’s demanding and they’re advanced shipping it to France and they’ve got centers here that immediately dispatch it and a lot of the time the shipping is free or maybe €1 or €2. So, it’s just unreal.

Godfree: It’s also very tempting. There you can now buy a really beautiful what we would have once called a professional video camera, high-def 8k, and everything with the built-in mic and the kind of thing that you see journalists using which were $50,000 twenty years ago, $5,000 ten years ago. They’re 500 bucks now. Amazing.

Jeff: What else is on your list?

Godfree: There’s a little quiet race going on. And I think your viewers might enjoy watching it and you can update them. But there’s a race to see who will successfully get their email system (catapult) working on their aircraft carrier first, both Gerald Ford, the big new American aircraft carrier, and the recently launched Chinese aircraft carrier have electronic or electrically driven takeoff and landing instead of steam-driven catapults. And the Gerald Ford has not, after 20 years of development, has not been able to get its catapult to work reliably.

So, it can’t go very far from the shore if the planes want to take off because they don’t know if they’ll be able to come back and land safely because the email is not reliable. So, here’s the race. Who will have combat-ready emails? First, the Gerald Ford, which was the ninth-generation aircraft carrier built for $12 billion and started 20 years ago, or the new Chinese carrier started three years ago for 1 billion.

Jeff: Yeah, the second one that just came out, what was it, a year or two ago, it’s the Liaoning. The Liaoning is already. So, they’ve already got two aircraft carrier groups watching Taiwan and Japan. Well, it’s really funny. I made a comment about this. In fact, when they launched the Liaoning, I think it was a couple of years. In fact, I think maybe it was in Thailand. We were in Thailand when I did a report on it.

I pointed out that China is the first country since World War Two to build as many aircraft carriers and groups in such a short period of time as the United States during World War Two, back when Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s administration essentially nationalized America’s industry. They were building three aircraft carrier groups a year during the Second World War. And they actually worked.

And this catastrophe with the Gerald Ford, there’s ...I don’t know if you’ve ever seen it, Godfree, but there’s this I think maybe I’ve seen it on www.southfront.org but occasionally they’ll put up a map of where are the aircraft carrier groups of the United States around planet Earth. They’ve got the Nimitz. And of course, it has to be on the other side of Japan because otherwise the Chinese DF21D the aircraft carrier killer would wipe it out in one minute. And so, they’ve got that one. Did you know that the United States Navy is in such pitiful shape they cannot even keep an aircraft carrier group in the Persian Gulf? There’s not one there anymore. They’re all in Los Angeles and they’re all in Virginia getting repaired.

Godfree: Well, you know why that is, Jeff?

Jeff: Why?

Godfree: I’ve read a lot of naval history of the fun kind, not the technical kind or the interesting kind. And this happens in long spells of peace where you have a big navy and a lot of ambitious officers and nothing to distinguish them except competitions. So, they run their crews and their boats ragged day in and day out with gunnery practice or whatever the shit it is in it that they’re supposed to do because their KPIs (key performance indicators) are being automatically reported to Sasebo, Japan or to Pearl Habor. They’ve been flat out for years and some of the reasons they’ve had these accidents are they’re running their crews ragged. The kids are tired.

Jeff: Yeah, yeah.

Godfree: So, they had to dial back the tempo. And the other thing, of course, is that as we know, the last time I looked, it costs about to maintain a strip of freeway.... costs something in the range of 10% of its original cost every year. It’s just a piece of concrete, very expensive, because for all kinds of reasons, drainage and blah, blah, blah. Well, a warship, which is extremely complex and custom-built. They’re not mass-produced, are extremely need a great deal of maintenance. And what’s the first thing that every capital-intensive industry skimps on is maintenance.

Jeff: Yeah, is maintenance.

Godfree: What a shiny ship, everyone wants a shiny ship. I want one. So, that’s what’s been happening. I think they’ve degraded it with a lot of weak oversight and poor senior command. No doctrine, really. The corruption thing did a lot of harm.

Jeff: Well, yeah, yeah, you and I both reported on the incredible amount of corruption in the Navy. I mean just like payola and kickbacks. And it’s just like something out of, Guido in Sicily in the Italian mafia. And these are like four- and five-star admirals in the US Navy just corrupt to the core. Just unbelievable.

Godfree: Yeah, it’s kind of sad although I do think they’re an anomaly. But the problem is that the system is corrupt. It’s not just they’re reflecting the fact that the chiefs and the Defense Department are thoroughly corrupt. Everyone knows that.

Jeff: Yeah. Yeah. With the McDonnell Douglas and Boeing and Raytheon.

Godfree: They’re all going to get a big payoff.

Jeff: Yeah, absolutely. They’re all getting their cut. So, anything else, my dear friend?

Godfree: Just one parting shot to this image of a sometimes-working emails system on the Gerald Ford. And it’s eight wings of F-35 jet planes that aren’t too reliable either.

Jeff: Yeah, I know that.

Godfree: So, you could get maybe the launch will work, but the F-35 engine won’t.

Jeff: It’s just unbelievable. And if a defense contractor in China put out the F-35, they would be in jail. They would be in jail and out of money. They would be destitute in jail. And if they endangered the lives of the pilots, they would get a PLA bullet in the back of the head, and yet here in the United States, everybody’s just nonchalant. The F-35 doesn’t work. It’s being all recalled because this doesn’t work now and that doesn’t work.

And then there was a crash recently in Texas where it landed and it crashed on the ground. And it’s just like Looney Tunes. It’s like the Keystone Cops. But it all gets back to, well, we need more money. We need more money. Just give us another 10 billion and we’ll get it taken care of because it’s not about national defense, it’s about making the defense the military-industrial complex, congresspeople, senators, and politicians very, very rich.

Godfree: That’s it.

Jeff: Exactly. Well, listen, Godfree, this has been wonderful. Godfree Roberts, “Here comes China” (https://www.herecomeschina.com/) his website. I will put the link on. I get his weekly newsletter. I love it. He is updating his book from 2020-2023. The title again, please. I’ve read it, but I can’t think of the name right now.

Godfree: Why China Leads the World: Talent at the Top, Data in the Middle, Democracy from the Bottom (https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08Q9PN8SV?ref_=pe_3052080_276849420)

Jeff: There you go. And our mutual friend, which I forgot. I had a brain burp. It’s Richard Miller, another one of our China Writer Group members along with Eric Arnow and you and Chiangmai, we miss you and we hope to come back and see you soon. Take care, Godfree. Be healthy, be happy, and be safe. I will give you a Buddhist bow to a guy in a Buddhist country.

Godfree: Good for you. See you soon.

Jeff: Talk to you soon.

Godfree: Bye, bye.

Jeff: Bye, bye.

ABOUT JEFF BROWN

The China Trilogy. It consists of 44 Days Backpacking in China - The Middle Kingdom in the 21st Century, with the United States, Europe and the Fate of the World in Its Looking Glass (2013); Punto Press released China Rising - Capitalist Roads, Socialist Destinations (2016); and for Badak Merah, Jeff authored China Is Communist, Dammit! – Dawn of the Red Dynasty (2017).
Jeff can be reached at China Rising, jeff@brownlanglois.com, Facebook, Twitter and Wechat/Whatsapp: +86-13823544196.

check this page on his special blog CHINA RISING RADIO SINOLAND

The battle against the Big Lie killing the world will not be won by you just reading this article. It will be won when you pass it on to at least 2 other people, requesting they do the same.

[dropcap]I[/dropcap]f you find China Rising Radio Sinoland's work useful and appreciate its quality, please consider making a donation. Money is spent to pay for Internet costs, maintenance, the upgrade of our computer network, and development of the site.
Just use the donation button below (yes, click on Sylvester the Kitty)—OR, just as easy, SCAN our QR code!





 

 

 

 Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
It’s super easy! Sign up to receive our FREE bulletin.  Get TGP selections in your mailbox. No obligation of any kind. All addresses secure and never sold or commercialised. 

[newsletter_form]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




L’Entente Is a Bitter Pill for the West

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


by Alastair Crooke
Strategic Culture Foundation




Pres. Xi Jinping and Pres. Putin shaking hands in symbol of enduring friendship.


Consequential Strategic Change
Upon leaving his meeting with Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping said to Putin, “Change is coming that hasn’t happened in 100 years – and we are driving this change together”.
The ‘Entente’ was sealed during hours of talks over two days, and amidst a plethora of signed documents. Two powerful states have formed a duality that, in marrying a gigantic manufacturing base to the pre-eminent raw materials supplier and the advanced weaponry and diplomatic nous of Russia, leaves the U.S. in the shade. A seat in the shadows (assumed through volitation, or inability to contemplate such radical transition) reflects the U.S. with its back turned towards participation in the unfolding multipolar world.

All of this propaganda is nonsense, of course. These are canards thrown to the winds. Washington understands how compelling is the Chinese narrative: China seeks harmony, peace and a meaningful way of life for all. America, however, stands for domination, divide and contain – and bloody, colonial-type forever wars (in the China meme).

Xi’s narrative has traction – not just in the ‘refuse-to-be-aligned’ world, but significantly within ‘Other America’, too. It even resonates a tad in otherwise wholly ‘tin-eared’ Europe.

The problem here, is that these ‘two Americas’ – the entitled Oligarchy and ‘Other America’ – simply were not able to discourse with each other, and have withdrawn into separate spheres: The western tech-platforms (such as Twitter) were knowingly configured so as to precisely not listen to ‘Other America’. And to cancel, or de-platform, contrarian voices. Today’s anti-Russian schema is yet another derivative of ‘nudge psychology’, originally trialled during Lockdown: Then ‘Science’ (as determined by the governments) offered public ‘certainty’, and at the same time stoked fear that any non-compliance with government rules might lead to death.

The moral certainty (claimed from following the ‘Science’) gave justification to judge harshly, condemn and dismiss people who in any way questioned Lockdown. Today’s geo-political psychological ploy – a derivative from the Lockdown precedent – is to ‘paste’ to the geo-political sphere the woke position of zero tolerance towards questioning supposed principles ‘that are inviolable’ (such as Human Rights). Thus, the schema uses the narrative ‘clarity’ of Russia’s ‘illegal, unprovoked and criminal invasion of Ukraine’ to give the western public the satisfying sense of righteousness needed to similarly judge harshly, oust from employment, and publicly denigrate any who expressed support for Russia.

This is viewed as an Intelligence Success, by contributing to the objective of maintaining NATO ‘burden sharing’ – and in ensuring across-the-board western expression of ‘moral outrage’ at all things Russian.

The notion of exposing differing facets to a conflict (which lies at the crux to mediation), providing differing perspectives coming into view, becomes intolerable when set against ‘black and white’ righteousness. Xi and Putin are held by the western media to be so morally deficient that many fear being scorned for being on the wrong side of the ‘moral’ fault line on such a contentious issue.

Notably, this ploy does not work in the rest of world, where wokism has little traction.

There is however a substrata of Ruling Class worry about this denial technique. Two real issues arise: First, can America survive absent U.S. hegemony? What bonds, what national meaning, what vision could substitute to hold such a diverse nation together? Is ‘modernity as the winner of history’ convincing in the context of contemporary cultural degeneracy? If today’s scouring ‘modernity’ comes only at the cost of personal loneliness and loss of self-esteem (which is the recognised symptom of alienation arising from severance from community-roots), is technological ‘modernity’ then worth it? Or can some return to earlier values become the guiding prerequisite to a different mode of modernity? – one that works with the grain, instead of against the grain of cultural embeddedness.

This is the key question posed by Presidents Xi and Putin (through the civilisational nation-state concept).

Secondly, the U.S. has morphed from being a military to essentially a rent-seeking financialised hegemon. What price the enduring U.S. business prosperity should the U.S. lose dollar hegemony? Dollar ‘privilege’ has long sustained U.S. prosperity. But American sanctions, asset seizures, and new monetary arrangements pose the question: Is the global order changed so much that dollar hegemony, beyond the U.S. and its dependencies, is no longer sustainable?

The western ruling classes are certain of the answer: Political and dollar hegemony are interconnected. Keeping power, enriching the ‘golden billion’, means sustaining both – even as the Élites plainly can see that the American narrative is losing traction around the world, and states are migrating to new trading blocs.

That ‘Other America’ is not so sure they see the carnage associated with America’s endless interventions as ‘worth the candle’. There is too, an undercurrent of thought that a financial system, dependent on ever more and ever bigger ‘fixes’ of financial stimulant, either is healthy (in creating inequalities), or that its’ pyramiding leverage can be sustained over the long term.

Some years ago when Nathan Gardels was speaking with Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew, the latter said“For America to be displaced … by an Asian people long despised and dismissed with contempt as decadent, feeble, corrupt and inept, is emotionally very difficult to accept”. Yew predicted, “The sense of cultural supremacy of the Americans will make this adjustment most difficult”.

Equally, for China, which has had a long and continuous history as a great power, to be blocked by a ‘people from nowhere’ is intolerable.

l’Entente is a bitter pill for the West. For a generation, separating Russia from China has been a primordial U.S. goal – as originally prescribed by Zbig Brzezinski: To contain both Russia and China through exacerbating regional disputes (Ukraine, Taiwan) was the zero-sum-game, with Russia the first target (to compel a pivot back to the West through economic implosion),and then move on to contain China – but China alone. (Yes, some in the West believed that a Russian pivot westwards was very feasible).

A former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State, Wess Mitchell, wrote in the National Interest magazine: To Prevent China Grabbing Taiwan: Stop Russia in Ukraine! Simply put, Mitchell’s point was: “Were the U.S. to inflict enough pain on Putin for his gamble in Ukraine”, then Xi implicitly would be contained.

So, containing Russia via Ukraine was ‘it’: “If the United States is going to threaten catastrophic sanctions against Russia over Ukraine, they better damn well be catastrophic, because the credibility of the U.S.-led financial system for punishing large-scale aggression – is on the line”, Mitchell warned. “The United States will only get one chance to demonstrate that credibility—and Ukraine is it”.

Mitchell continued,

The good news in all of this is that Ukraine has given the U.S. a momentary, and perishable, window to act decisively and not only deal with the situation in Ukraine – but dissuade a move against Taiwan… The impact of Putin’s brutality in galvanizing European burden-sharing is a game-changer for U.S. global strategy. With Germany spending more in coming years on defense than Russia ($110 billion annually vs. $62 billion), the United States will be able to focus more of its available conventional forces on deterring China”.

The Biden Administration had bet all on a containment strategy intended to avoid a two-front war – a strategy that has not worked out, as expected. More than that, the shooting down of the Chinese balloon and the ensuing anti-Chinese battle cries emanating from all quarters in the U.S. convinced the Chinese that their earlier, November attempt at détente with U.S. and Europe at the Bali G20 was ‘dead in the water’.

l’Entente. The Brzezinski divide and rule strategy had been holed below the waterline and sunk.

The West is now painted into a corner: It cannot sustain war on both Russia and China, yet its overblown, deliberately deceitful, manipulation of public opinion to create western ‘cohesion’ makes de-escalation almost impossible.

The public in the U.S. and Europe now sees Russia and China in the darkest shades of the Manichaean Demiurge. They have been repeatedly told that Russia stands at the cusp of total collapse, and that Ukraine ‘is winning’. Most Americans, most Europeans believe this. Many have come to revile these new adversaries.

The U.S. leadership class cannot back down. Yet, it has not the means to wage a two-front war. The trap consists in propaganda stemming from an earlier Lockdown schema that was designed to frighten, and dis-inform the public. A principal aim of which was to make doubt or scepticism appear morally irresponsible within public discourse. Similarly, the new schema of western public control by which Presidents Xi and Putin are made to look so morally deficient that much of the public fears to criticise the war on Russia – has boomeranged. That ‘certainty’ means that it would be morally irresponsible to back out of a war – even one that is being lost. The war now must proceed to the defeat of the Ukrainian regime – an outcome far more humiliating than a negotiated end would have been. But public opinion will not allow anything less than Putin’s humiliation. The West is stuck between the public sentiment which it contrived and the reality on the ground.

In this way, the West fell into its own ‘Certainty Trap’.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE
Alastair Crooke is a former British diplomat, founder and director of the Beirut-based Conflicts Forum.


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Historian Eric Zuesse: Why Harry Truman Was America’s Worst-Ever President

Please share this article as widely as you can.


DEFEAT CAPITALISM AND ITS DEADLY SPAWN, IMPERIALISM
ecological murder •

ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE
AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public..


Print this article


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

[/su_spoiler]

Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days.
[newsletter_form]


[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

NOTE: ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.



China Declares War On The United States

Please share this article as widely as you can.


DEFEAT CAPITALISM AND ITS DEADLY SPAWN, IMPERIALISM
ecological murder •
Gonzalo Lira


US Hegemony and Its Perils

2023-02-20 16:28

US Hegemony and Its Perils

February 2023

Contents

Introduction

I. Political Hegemony—Throwing Its Weight Around

II. Military Hegemony—Wanton Use of Force 

III. Economic Hegemony—Looting and Exploitation

IV. Technological Hegemony—Monopoly and Suppression

V. Cultural Hegemony—Spreading False Narratives

Conclusion

Introduction

Since becoming the world's most powerful country after the two world wars and the Cold War, the United States has acted more boldly to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, pursue, maintain and abuse hegemony, advance subversion and infiltration, and willfully wage wars, bringing harm to the international community.


China’s top diplomat Wang Yi said the U.S. handling of the balloon incident had been “unimaginable” and “hysterical” during his remarks at the Munich Security Conference. As the Sino-American crisis continues to escalate due to US insolence, Beijing's language is becoming less conciliatory.

The United States has developed a hegemonic playbook to stage "color revolutions," instigate regional disputes, and even directly launch wars under the guise of promoting democracy, freedom and human rights. Clinging to the Cold War mentality, the United States has ramped up bloc politics and stoked conflict and confrontation. It has overstretched the concept of national security, abused export controls and forced unilateral sanctions upon others. It has taken a selective approach to international law and rules, utilizing or discarding them as it sees fit, and has sought to impose rules that serve its own interests in the name of upholding a "rules-based international order."

I. Political Hegemony -- Throwing Its Weight Around

The United States has long been attempting to mold other countries and the world order with its own values and political system in the name of promoting democracy and human rights.

Instances of U.S. interference in other countries' internal affairs abound. In the name of "promoting democracy," the United States practiced a "Neo-Monroe Doctrine" in Latin America, instigated "color revolutions" in Eurasia, and orchestrated the "Arab Spring" in West Asia and North Africa, bringing chaos and disaster to many countries.

In 1823, the United States announced the Monroe Doctrine. While touting an "America for the Americans," what it truly wanted was an "America for the United States."

The year 2003 marked the beginning of a succession of "color revolutions" -- the "Rose Revolution" in Georgia, the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine and the "Tulip Revolution" in Kyrgyzstan. The U.S. Department of State openly admitted playing a "central role" in these "regime changes." The United States also interfered in the internal affairs of the Philippines, ousting President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. in 1986 and President Joseph Estrada in 2001 through the so-called "People Power Revolutions."

In January 2023, former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo released his new book Never Give an Inch: Fighting for the America I Love. He revealed in it that the United States had plotted to intervene in Venezuela. The plan was to force the Maduro government to reach an agreement with the opposition, deprive Venezuela of its ability to sell oil and gold for foreign exchange, exert high pressure on its economy, and influence the 2018 presidential election.

The U.S. exercises double standards on international rules. Placing its self-interest first, the United States has walked away from international treaties and organizations, and put its domestic law above international law. In April 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would cut off all U.S. funding to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) with the excuse that the organization "supports, or participates in the management of a programme of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization." The United States quit UNESCO twice in 1984 and 2017. In 2017, it announced leaving the Paris Agreement on climate change. In 2018, it announced its exit from the UN Human Rights Council, citing the organization's "bias" against Israel and failure to protect human rights effectively. In 2019, the United States announced its withdrawal from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty to seek unfettered development of advanced weapons. In 2020, it announced pulling out of the Treaty on Open Skies.

The United States has also been a stumbling block to biological arms control by opposing negotiations on a verification protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and impeding international verification of countries' activities relating to biological weapons. As the only country in possession of a chemical weapons stockpile, the United States has repeatedly delayed the destruction of chemical weapons and remained reluctant in fulfilling its obligations. It has become the biggest obstacle to realizing "a world free of chemical weapons."

The United States is piecing together small blocs through its alliance system. It has been forcing an "Indo-Pacific Strategy" onto the Asia-Pacific region, assembling exclusive clubs like the Five Eyes, the Quad and AUKUS, and forcing regional countries to take sides. Such practices are essentially meant to create division in the region, stoke confrontation and undermine peace.

The U.S. arbitrarily passes judgment on democracy in other countries, and fabricates a false narrative of "democracy versus authoritarianism" to incite estrangement, division, rivalry and confrontation. In December 2021, the United States hosted the first "Summit for Democracy," which drew criticism and opposition from many countries for making a mockery of the spirit of democracy and dividing the world. In March 2023, the United States will host another "Summit for Democracy," which remains unwelcome and will again find no support.

II. Military Hegemony -- Wanton Use of Force

The history of the United States is characterized by violence and expansion. Since it gained independence in 1776, the United States has constantly sought expansion by force: it slaughtered Indians, invaded Canada, waged a war against Mexico, instigated the American-Spanish War, and annexed Hawaii. After World War II, the wars either provoked or launched by the United States included the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan, the Iraq War, the Libyan War and the Syrian War, abusing its military hegemony to pave the way for expansionist objectives. In recent years, the U.S. average annual military budget has exceeded 700 billion U.S. dollars, accounting for 40 percent of the world's total, more than the 15 countries behind it combined. The United States has about 800 overseas military bases, with 173,000 troops deployed in 159 countries.

According to the book America Invades: How We've Invaded or been Militarily Involved with almost Every Country on Earth, the United States has fought or been militarily involved with almost all the 190-odd countries recognized by the United Nations with only three exceptions. The three countries were "spared" because the United States did not find them on the map.

As former U.S. President Jimmy Carter put it, the United States is undoubtedly the most warlike nation in the history of the world. According to a Tufts University report, "Introducing the Military Intervention Project: A new Dataset on U.S. Military Interventions, 1776-2019," the United States undertook nearly 400 military interventions globally between those years, 34 percent of which were in Latin America and the Caribbean, 23 percent in East Asia and the Pacific, 14 percent in the Middle East and North Africa, and 13 percent in Europe. Currently, its military intervention in the Middle East and North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa is on the rise.

Alex Lo, a South China Morning Post columnist, pointed out that the United States has rarely distinguished between diplomacy and war since its founding. It overthrew democratically elected governments in many developing countries in the 20th century and immediately replaced them with pro-American puppet regimes. Today, in Ukraine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Pakistan and Yemen, the United States is repeating its old tactics of waging proxy, low-intensity, and drone wars.

U.S. military hegemony has caused humanitarian tragedies. Since 2001, the wars and military operations launched by the United States in the name of fighting terrorism have claimed over 900,000 lives with some 335,000 of them civilians, injured millions and displaced tens of millions. The 2003 Iraq War resulted in some 200,000 to 250,000 civilian deaths, including over 16,000 directly killed by the U.S. military, and left more than a million homeless.

The United States has created 37 million refugees around the world. Since 2012, the number of Syrian refugees alone has increased tenfold. Between 2016 and 2019, 33,584 civilian deaths were documented in the Syrian fightings, including 3,833 killed by U.S.-led coalition bombings, half of them women and children. The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) reported on 9 November 2018 that the air strikes launched by U.S. forces on Raqqa alone killed 1,600 Syrian civilians.

The two-decades-long war in Afghanistan devastated the country. A total of 47,000 Afghan civilians and 66,000 to 69,000 Afghan soldiers and police officers unrelated to the September 11 attacks were killed in U.S. military operations, and more than 10 million people were displaced. The war in Afghanistan destroyed the foundation of economic development there and plunged the Afghan people into destitution. After the "Kabul debacle" in 2021, the United States announced that it would freeze some 9.5 billion dollars in assets belonging to the Afghan central bank, a move considered as "pure looting."

In September 2022, Turkish Interior Minister Suleyman Soylu commented at a rally that the United States has waged a proxy war in Syria, turned Afghanistan into an opium field and heroin factory, thrown Pakistan into turmoil, and left Libya in incessant civil unrest. The United States does whatever it takes to rob and enslave the people of any country with underground resources.

The United States has also adopted appalling methods in war. During the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, the War in Afghanistan and the Iraq War, the United States used massive quantities of chemical and biological weapons as well as cluster bombs, fuel-air bombs, graphite bombs and depleted uranium bombs, causing enormous damage on civilian facilities, countless civilian casualties and lasting environmental pollution.

III. Economic Hegemony -- Looting and Exploitation

The United States exploits the world's wealth with the help of "seigniorage." It costs only about 17 cents to produce a 100 dollar bill, but other countries had to pony up 100 dollar of actual goods in order to obtain one. It was pointed out more than half a century ago, that the United States enjoyed exorbitant privilege and deficit without tears created by its dollar, and used the worthless paper note to plunder the resources and factories of other nations.

The hegemony of U.S. dollar is the main source of instability and uncertainty in the world economy. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the United States abused its global financial hegemony and injected trillions of dollars into the global market, leaving other countries, especially emerging economies, to pay the price. In 2022, the Fed ended its ultra-easy monetary policy and turned to aggressive interest rate hike, causing turmoil in the international financial market and substantial depreciation of other currencies such as the Euro, many of which dropped to a 20-year low. As a result, a large number of developing countries were challenged by high inflation, currency depreciation and capital outflows. This was exactly what Nixon's secretary of the treasury John Connally once remarked, with self-satisfaction yet sharp precision, that "the dollar is our currency, but it is your problem."

With its control over international economic and financial organizations, the United States imposes additional conditions to their assistance to other countries. In order to reduce obstacles to U.S. capital inflow and speculation, the recipient countries are required to advance financial liberalization and open up financial markets so that their economic policies would fall in line with America's strategy. According to the Review of International Political Economy, along with the 1,550 debt relief programs extended by the IMF to its 131 member countries from 1985 to 2014, as many as 55,465 additional political conditions had been attached.

The United States willfully suppresses its opponents with economic coercion. In the 1980s, to eliminate the economic threat posed by Japan, and to control and use the latter in service of America's strategic goal of confronting the Soviet Union and dominating the world, the United States leveraged its hegemonic financial power against Japan, and concluded the Plaza Accord. As a result, Yen was pushed up, and Japan was pressed to open up its financial market and reform its financial system. The Plaza Accord dealt a heavy blow to the growth momentum of the Japanese economy, leaving Japan to what was later called "three lost decades."

America's economic and financial hegemony has become a geopolitical weapon. Doubling down on unilateral sanctions and "long-arm jurisdiction," the United States has enacted such domestic laws as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, and the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, and introduced a series of executive orders to sanction specific countries, organizations or individuals. Statistics show that U.S. sanctions against foreign entities increased by 933 percent from 2000 to 2021. The Trump administration alone has imposed more than 3,900 sanctions, which means three sanctions per day. So far, the United States had or has imposed economic sanctions on nearly 40 countries across the world, including Cuba, China, Russia, the DPRK, Iran and Venezuela, affecting nearly half of the world's population. "The United States of America" has turned itself into "the United States of Sanctions." And "long-arm jurisdiction" has been reduced to nothing but a tool for the United States to use its means of state power to suppress economic competitors and interfere in normal international business. This is a serious departure from the principles of liberal market economy that the United States has long boasted.

IV. Technological Hegemony -- Monopoly and Suppression

The United States seeks to deter other countries' scientific, technological and economic development by wielding monopoly power, suppression measures and technology restrictions in high-tech fields.

The United States monopolizes intellectual property in the name of protection. Taking advantage of the weak position of other countries, especially developing ones, on intellectual property rights and the institutional vacancy in relevant fields, the United States reaps excessive profits through monopoly. In 1994, the United States pushed forward the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), forcing the Americanized process and standards in intellectual property protection in an attempt to solidify its monopoly on technology.

In the 1980s, to contain the development of Japan's semiconductor industry, the United States launched the "301" investigation, built bargaining power in bilateral negotiations through multilateral agreements, threatened to label Japan as conducting unfair trade, and imposed retaliatory tariffs, forcing Japan to sign the U.S.-Japan Semiconductor Agreement. As a result, Japanese semiconductor enterprises were almost completely driven out of global competition, and their market share dropped from 50 percent to 10 percent. Meanwhile, with the support of the U.S. government, a large number of U.S. semiconductor enterprises took the opportunity and grabbed larger market share.

The United States politicizes, weaponizes technological issues and uses them as ideological tools. Overstretching the concept of national security, the United States mobilized state power to suppress and sanction Chinese company Huawei, restricted the entry of Huawei products into the U.S. market, cut off its supply of chips and operating systems, and coerced other countries to ban Huawei from undertaking local 5G network construction. It even talked Canada into unwarrantedly detaining Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou for nearly three years.

The United States has fabricated a slew of excuses to clamp down on China's high-tech enterprises with global competitiveness, and has put more than 1,000 Chinese enterprises on sanction lists. In addition, the United States has also imposed controls on biotechnology, artificial intelligence and other high-end technologies, reinforced export restrictions, tightened investment screening, suppressed Chinese social media apps such as TikTok and WeChat, and lobbied the Netherlands and Japan to restrict exports of chips and related equipment or technology to China.

The United States has also practiced double standards in its policy on China-related technological professionals. To sideline and suppress Chinese researchers, since June 2018, visa validity has been shortened for Chinese students majoring in certain high-tech-related disciplines, repeated cases have occurred where Chinese scholars and students going to the United States for exchange programs and study were unjustifiably denied and harassed, and large-scale investigation on Chinese scholars working in the United States was carried out.

The United States solidifies its technological monopoly in the name of protecting democracy. By building small blocs on technology such as the "chips alliance" and "clean network," the United States has put "democracy" and "human rights" labels on high-technology, and turned technological issues into political and ideological issues, so as to fabricate excuses for its technological blockade against other countries. In May 2019, the United States enlisted 32 countries to the Prague 5G Security Conference in the Czech Republic and issued the Prague Proposal in an attempt to exclude China's 5G products. In April 2020, then U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the "5G clean path," a plan designed to build technological alliance in the 5G field with partners bonded by their shared ideology on democracy and the need to protect "cyber security." The measures, in essence, are the U.S. attempts to maintain its technological hegemony through technological alliances.

The United States abuses its technological hegemony by carrying out cyber attacks and eavesdropping. The United States has long been notorious as an "empire of hackers," blamed for its rampant acts of cyber theft around the world. It has all kinds of means to enforce pervasive cyber attacks and surveillance, including using analog base station signals to access mobile phones for data theft, manipulating mobile apps, infiltrating cloud servers, and stealing through undersea cables. The list goes on.

U.S. surveillance is indiscriminate. All can be targets of its surveillance, be they rivals or allies, even leaders of allied countries such as former German Chancellor Angela Merkel and several French Presidents. Cyber surveillance and attacks launched by the United States such as "Prism," "Dirtbox," "Irritant Horn" and "Telescreen Operation" are all proof that the United States is closely monitoring its allies and partners. Such eavesdropping on allies and partners has already caused worldwide outrage. Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, a website that has exposed U.S. surveillance programs, said that "do not expect a global surveillance superpower to act with honor or respect. There is only one rule: there are no rules."

V. Cultural Hegemony -- Spreading False Narratives

The global expansion of American culture is an important part of its external strategy. The United States has often used cultural tools to strengthen and maintain its hegemony in the world.

The United States embeds American values in its products such as movies. American values and lifestyle are a tied product to its movies and TV shows, publications, media content, and programs by the government-funded non-profit cultural institutions. It thus shapes a cultural and public opinion space in which American culture reigns and maintains cultural hegemony. In his article The Americanization of the World, John Yemma, an American scholar, exposed the real weapons in U.S. cultural expansion: the Hollywood, the image design factories on Madison Avenue and the production lines of Mattel Company and Coca-Cola.

American cultural hegemony not only shows itself in "direct intervention," but also in "media infiltration" and as "a trumpet for the world." U.S.-dominated Western media has a particularly important role in shaping global public opinion in favor of U.S. meddling in the internal affairs of other countries.

The U.S. government strictly censors all social media companies and demands their obedience. Twitter CEO Elon Musk admitted on 27 December 2022 that all social media platforms work with the U.S. government to censor content, reported Fox Business Network. Public opinion in the United States is subject to government intervention to restrict all unfavorable remarks. Google often makes pages disappear.

U.S. Department of Defense manipulates social media. In December 2022, The Intercept, an independent U.S. investigative website, revealed that in July 2017, U.S. Central Command official Nathaniel Kahler instructed Twitter's public policy team to augment the presence of 52 Arabic-language accounts on a list he sent, six of which were to be given priority. One of the six was dedicated to justifying U.S. drone attacks in Yemen, such as by claiming that the attacks were precise and killed only terrorists, not civilians. Following Kahler's directive, Twitter put those Arabic-language accounts on a "white list" to amplify certain messages.

The United States practices double standards on the freedom of the press. It brutally suppresses and silences media of other countries by various means. The United States and Europe bar mainstream Russian media such as Russia Today and the Sputnik from their countries. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube openly restrict official accounts of Russia. Netflix, Apple and Google have removed Russian channels and applications from their services and app stores. Unprecedented draconian censorship is imposed on Russia-related contents.

The United States abuses its cultural hegemony to instigate "peaceful evolution" in socialist countries. It sets up news media and cultural outfits targeting socialist countries. It pours staggering amounts of public funds into radio and TV networks to support their ideological infiltration, and these mouthpieces bombard socialist countries in dozens of languages with inflammatory propaganda day and night.

The United States uses misinformation as a spear to attack other countries, and has built an industrial chain around it: there are groups and individuals making up stories, and peddling them worldwide to mislead public opinion with the support of nearly limitless financial resources.

Conclusion

While a just cause wins its champion wide support, an unjust one condemns its pursuer to be an outcast. The hegemonic, domineering, and bullying practices of using strength to intimidate the weak, taking from others by force and subterfuge, and playing zero-sum games are exerting grave harm. The historical trends of peace, development, cooperation, and mutual benefit are unstoppable. The United States has been overriding truth with its power and trampling justice to serve self-interest. These unilateral, egoistic and regressive hegemonic practices have drawn growing, intense criticism and opposition from the international community.

Countries need to respect each other and treat each other as equals. Big countries should behave in a manner befitting their status and take the lead in pursuing a new model of state-to-state relations featuring dialogue and partnership, not confrontation or alliance. China opposes all forms of hegemonism and power politics, and rejects interference in other countries' internal affairs. The United States must conduct serious soul-searching. It must critically examine what it has done, let go of its arrogance and prejudice, and quit its hegemonic, domineering and bullying practices.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE
Gonzalo Lira is a prominent Chilean-American political analyst and vlogger residing in Kharkiv, Ukraine.


Print this article


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

[/su_spoiler]

Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days.
[newsletter_form]


[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

NOTE: ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.



BALLOONACY

Please share this article as widely as you can.


DEFEAT CAPITALISM AND ITS DEADLY SPAWN, IMPERIALISM
ecological murder •
Paul Edwards

ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE

Paul (left) at an Occupy WS demonstration in 2011

Associate Editor Paul Edwards is a genuine Renaissance man, gifted with many talents and participant in many events and struggles of our tormented times. Our colleague Jeff Brown, who did a fine interview with him, sums it up thusly: “Paul’s life story is worthy of a biography: a rebel youth growing up, traveling and working around the world and then a long career as a Hollywood writer. Through it all, he has never lost his lifelong wrath against US imperialism and global capitalism, while seeking social and economic justice for humanity’s 99%…


Print this article


Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

[/su_spoiler]

Don’t forget to sign up for our FREE bulletin. Get The Greanville Post in your mailbox every few days.
[newsletter_form]


[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

NOTE: ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.