Obama’s Grand Bargain 2.0

by Stephen Lendman

obama-BW

Obama’s job creation plan targets social justice. It’s old wine in new bottles. It prioritizes corporate tax cuts.  It scorns fairness. It ducks reality. It’s same old, same old. It doesn’t work. It never did. It’s not designed to. It won’t now. Don’t expect media scoundrels to explain. They’re in lockstep with what helps business. They’re comfortable with rich elites benefitting at the expense of most others.

In collusion with Republicans, Obama proposed more trickle down. He claims what never worked before will this time. His ideas aren’t new. He’s selling snake oil. He’s packaging it. A scam is a scam is a scam. He wants nominal corporate tax rates cut from 35% to 28%. He wants manufacturers paying 25%.

Average corporate taxes are 12%. Loopholes facilitate avoidance. US companies pay the lowest developed economy rate. It’s half what they paid from 1989 – 2008. Obama claims years of budget fights diverted attention from restoring middle class health. It’s disappearing altogether. Gene Sperling heads Obama’s National Economic Council.  He served Bill Clinton in the same capacity. He said Obama’s “putting forward a new kind of ‘grand bargain.’ ”  He claims business handouts will create jobs. They’ll raise revenue for infrastructure. Other public works projects will follow. So will manufacturing innovation centers and community college training. They’ll close skill gaps. They’ll stimulate economic growth. They’ll do none of the above. They never did before. They won’t now. Claiming otherwise rings hollow.

Republicans dismissed Obama’s plan. They did so out of hand. They’re insatiable. They want more. Don’t bet they won’t get it. According to Senator Mitch McConnell:

Obama’s plan “represents an unmistakable signal that the president has backed away from his campaign-era promise to corporate America that tax reform would be revenue-neutral to them.”

In other words, cut corporate taxes, provide generous handouts, and make ordinary people bear the burden. An unnamed administration official claims jobs will be created by a one-time transition fee. Supposedly it’ll be on $2 trillion in foreign earnings held abroad. Don’t bet on it. Details aren’t known. Money amounts generated may be meager at best. No one knows. No one’s sure. No one’s saying.  Obama proposed a permanent small business expensing increase to $1 million annually. He’ll hold a two-day October 1 – November 1 conference.

He wants foreign companies encouraged to locate in America. He plans meeting with corporate CEOs. He’ll urge them to hire longterm unemployed. He tried similar stunts before. They didn’t work earlier. They won’t work now. They’re like expecting business to self-regulate responsibly.  It’s impossible. It’s believing what never worked before will succeed brilliantly now.

Obama will meet separately with House and Senate Democrats. Lawmakers face FY end September 30 economic decisions. They include federal spending levels. Raising the $16.7 trillion debt limit will be debated. Republicans demand spending cuts like they always do. Expect Obama to cave like before. He’s a pushover. He will again. Relief for beleaguered Americans remains more illusion than reality.

Economic conditions are weak. Main Street’s in Depression. Things are getting worse, not better. Economist John Williams reengineers economic data. He does so responsibly. He does it based on early 1980s modeling. He does it before calculations were corrupted. Doing so belies reality. He pegs real unemployment at 23.4%. It’s the highest since the 1930s. Real inflation’s at 9.4%. People who eat, drive cars, pay rent, have medical bills, heat and/or air condition homes, and have kids in college know inflation better than talking head tout TV economists. They’re paid to lie, tell half truths and exaggerate.

Millions of working age Americans struggle to get by. They endure unemployment, poverty, homelessness, hunger and despair at record levels or close to it. Privileged elites benefit enormously. They’ve done so more than ever on Obama’s watch. Wealth disparity’s at unprecedented levels. Bipartisan complicity worsens things. War on America’s social contract rages. Obama’s plan assures widening the wealth gap. Grand bargain 2.0 assures betrayal. Force-fed austerity accompanies corporate handouts.

It’s typical Obama. He’s a con man. He’s money power’s point man. He sacrificed economic growth for Wall Street. He’s got more of the same in mind. His FY 2014 budget slashes another $630 billion from Medicare and Social Security. He plans trillions of dollars more in domestic spending cuts. He wants them when millions need help.  He showers it on corporate America. He shuns people needs. He’s in lockstep with Republicans. They plan massive tax code changes. Business will get hundreds of billions more in benefits.

Ordinary people will pay more. They’ve be hung out to dry for years. They’ll be thrown under the bus again. It’s coming as America’s economy heads south. It’s when global economic conditions are weakening. High-pay/good benefit jobs keep hemorrhaging. Low-pay/poor or no benefit ones replace them. In the past year, union membership declined by 500,000. Organized labor’s fast disappearing.

Deficit cutting assures greater economic weakness. It’s the new normal. It’s trouble for middle America. It’s disappearing. It’s disaster for disadvantaged households. Popular needs are ignored. Business is favored. A race to the bottom continues. Doublespeak duplicity hides reality. Obama’s notion of change is double downed harshness. He’s in lockstep with Republicans. So are most Democrats. They pretend otherwise. Social injustice deepens. So does institutionalized inequality. It’s happening in plain sight.

It’s ugly. It’s real. It hurts millions needing help. Hard times are getting harder. It’s happening when America’s privileged class benefits. It never had it so good. Obama plans more of the same. He serves wealth, power and privilege alone. He ignores people in need. He’s waging financial war on humanity. He’s heartless, soulless and cruel. He supports capital’s divine right. Money power runs America. What it wants it gets. It’s happening when 80% of US adults are financially insecure. They face unemployment, poverty or close to it, and welfare to survive at times in their lives.

It’s a shocking indictment of social injustice. It’s getting worse. America’s being thirdworldized. According to Washington University/St. Louis Professor Mark Rank‘s survey data, 85% of US adults will experience financial insecurity at times in their lives by 2030. It’s defined as having income below 150% of the poverty line, being unemployed, and needing welfare to survive for a year or longer.

Hardship’s growing among whites. It affects 90% of people of color. For the first time in 38 years, the number of “white single-mother households living in poverty with children” equaled or surpassed African-Americans enduring similar conditions. According to Professor William Julius Wilson:

“It’s time that America comes to understand that many of the nation’s biggest disparities, from education and life expectancy to poverty, are increasingly due to economic class position.”

“(I)nvisible poor” people fill urban, suburban and rural America. They’re out of sight and mind. Their numbers are growing. They face deepening hard times. They struggle to get by. They don’t earn enough to do it. They earn nothing when unemployed. They need welfare much of the time. It’s on the chopping block for elimination.  Medicaid, food stamps, and other benefits are eroding. In a decade or sooner, they may be entirely gone. Obama targets them. So do most Republicans and Democrats.

They’re transforming America into a ruler – serf society. It’s unfit to live in. It’s beautiful for the privileged few alone. It’s nightmarish for most others. It’s a monument to social injustice. It’s institutionalized. It’s a race to the bottom. It’s a fast track to dystopian harshness. It’s the new normal. It’s the American way.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached atlendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.  His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.  http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour 

http://www.dailycensored.com/obamas-grand-bargain-2-0/




Obama decries economic problems he himself partially precipitated or did nothing to correct

Obama has been making noises lately about the plight of the economy (while assuring us it’s on the mend) and the tough times faced by the majority of the population, rhetoric calculated to pre-empt the still leaderless anger building among the masses. The fly in the ointment is that, as usual, his words are almost the exact opposite of his actions (or inactions).

This is the same man who, from the start and to this day:

•Appointed foxes to guard the Economic chicken coop;
•Has refused to proceed with a true stimulus program involving a massive infrastructural program;
•Has done nothing to truly rein in Wall Street speculations.
•Continues to coddle the banking industry.
•Play the fiddle while the environment burns, provided negative leadership, or, at best, used token measures instead of strong remedial policies. (A break with the coal/hydrocarbon quasi monopoly in the energy sector alone could have restored the economy to a healthy level, while actually helping the world’s ecosystems to begin healing themselves.)

•Expanded the intel/military’s budget hole by authorizing more and more illegal wars and criminal missions and policies.

July 27, 2013

NYTimesLogo
By  and 

GALESBURG, Ill. — In a week when he tried to focus attention on the struggles of the middle class, President Obama said in an interview that he was worried that years of widening income inequality and the lingering effects of the financial crisis had frayed the country’s social fabric and undermined Americans’ belief in opportunity.

Upward mobility, Mr. Obama said in a 40-minute interview with The New York Times, “was part and parcel of who we were as Americans.”

“And that’s what’s been eroding over the last 20, 30 years, well before the financial crisis,” he added.

“If we don’t do anything, then growth will be slower than it should be. Unemployment will not go down as fast as it should. Income inequality will continue to rise,” he said. “That’s not a future that we should accept.”

A few days after the acquittal in the Trayvon Martin case prompted him to speak about being a black man in America, Mr. Obama said the country’s struggle over race would not be eased until the political process in Washington began addressing the fear of many people that financial stability is unattainable.

“Racial tensions won’t get better; they may get worse, because people will feel as if they’ve got to compete with some other group to get scraps from a shrinking pot,” Mr. Obama said. “If the economy is growing, everybody feels invested. Everybody feels as if we’re rolling in the same direction.”

Mr. Obama, who this fall will choose a new chairman of the Federal Reserve to share economic stewardship, expressed confidence that the trends could be reversed with the right policies.

The economy is “far stronger” than four years ago, he said, yet many people who write to him still do not feel secure about their future, even as their current situation recovers.

“That’s what people sense,” he said. “That’s why people are anxious. That’s why people are frustrated.”

During much of the interview, Mr. Obama was philosophical about historical and economic forces that he said were tearing at communities across the country. He noted at one point that he has in the Oval Office a framed copy of the original program from the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom 50 years ago, when the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. gave his “I Have a Dream” speech.

He uses it, he said, to remind people “that was a march for jobs and justice; that there was a massive economic component to that. When you think about the coalition that brought about civil rights, it wasn’t just folks who believed in racial equality. It was people who believed in working folks having a fair shot.”

For decades after, Mr. Obama said, in places like Galesburg people “who wanted to find a job — they could go get a job.”

“They could go get it at the Maytag plant,” he said. “They could go get it with the railroad. It might be hard work, it might be tough work, but they could buy a house with it.”

Without a shift in Washington to encourage growth over “damaging” austerity, he added, not only would the middle class shrink, but in turn, contentious issues like trade, climate change and immigration could become harder to address.

Striking a feisty note at times, he vowed not to be cowed by his Republican adversaries in Congress and said he was willing to stretch the limits of his powers to change the direction of the debate in Washington.

“I will seize any opportunity I can find to work with Congress to strengthen the middle class, improve their prospects, improve their security,” Mr. Obama said. But he added, “I’m not just going to sit back if the only message from some of these folks is no on everything, and sit around and twiddle my thumbs for the next 1,200 days.”

Addressing for the first time one of his most anticipated decisions, Mr. Obama said he had narrowed his choice to succeed Ben S. Bernanke as chairman of the Federal Reserve to “some extraordinary candidates.” With current fiscal policy measurably slowing the recovery, many in business and finance have looked to the Fed to continue its expansionary monetary policies to offset the drag.

Mr. Obama said he wanted someone who would not just work abstractly to keep inflation in check and ensure stability in the markets. “The idea is to promote those things in service of the lives of ordinary Americans getting better,” he said. “I want a Fed chairman that can step back and look at that objectively and say, Let’s make sure that we’re growing the economy.”

The leading Fed candidates are believed to be Lawrence H. Summers, Mr. Obama’s former White House economic adviser and President Bill Clinton’s Treasury secretary, and Janet Yellen, the current Fed vice chairwoman and another former Clinton official. The president said he would announce his choice “over the next several months.”

More clearly than he did in three speeches on the economy last week — the next is scheduled for Tuesday in Chattanooga, Tenn. — Mr. Obama in the interview called for an end to the emphasis on budget austerity that Republicans ushered in when they captured control of the House in November 2010.

The priority, he said, should be spending for infrastructure, education, clean energy, science, research and other domestic initiatives of the sort he twice campaigned on.

“I want to make sure that all of us in Washington are investing as much time, as much energy, as much debate on how we grow the economy and grow the middle class as we’ve spent over the last two to three years arguing about how we reduce the deficits,” Mr. Obama said. He called for a shift “away from what I think has been a damaging framework in Washington.”

The president did not say what his legislative strategy would be. Even as he spoke, House Republicans were pushing measures in the opposite direction: to continue into the fiscal year that starts Oct. 1 the indiscriminate across-the-board spending reductions — known as sequestration — that Mr. Obama opposes, and to cut his priorities deeper still.

Republicans are also threatening to block an increase in the government’s borrowing limit — an action that must be taken by perhaps November to avoid financial crisis — unless Congress withholds money for his health care law.

Mr. Obama all but dared Republicans to challenge his executive actions, including his decision three weeks ago to delay until 2015 the health care law’s mandate that large employers provide insurance or pay fines. Republicans and some legal scholars questioned whether he had the legal authority to unilaterally change the law.

The delay in the employer mandate, which mostly affects large businesses that already insure workers but are worried about federal reporting requirements, was “the kind of routine modifications or tweaks to a large program that’s starting off that in normal times in a normal political atmosphere would draw a yawn from everybody,” Mr. Obama said.

“If Congress thinks that what I’ve done is inappropriate or wrong in some fashion, they’re free to make that case,” he said. “But there’s not an action that I take that you don’t have some folks in Congress who say that I’m usurping my authority. Some of those folks think I usurp my authority by having the gall to win the presidency.”

The president’s latest campaign for his agenda began as national polls last week showed a dip in his public support. The declines were even greater for Congress and Republicans in particular, in their already record-low ratings.

Mr. Obama said he would push ahead with a series of speeches that lay out his agenda ahead of the fights this fall with Congress. “If once a week I’m not talking about jobs, the economy, and the middle class,” he said, “then all matter of distraction fills the void.”




OpEds—America: Super-Bully Nation

by Stephen Lendman

Lindsey Graham—a little gift from South Carolina, the state that also kicked off the Civil War, easily one of the vilest examples of humanity in a Congressional cesspool packed with them.

Lindsey Graham—a little gift from South Carolina, the state that also kicked off the Civil War, easily one of the vilest examples of humanity in a Congressional cesspool packed with such repulsive specimens.

Count the ways. Obama’s waging financial war on humanity. He’s waging multiple direct and indirect hot ones. He bears full responsibility.  He represents the worst of rogue leadership. He heads America’s coup d’etat government. It “lacks constitutional and legal legitimacy,” said Paul Craig Roberts

Washington’s ruled by “usurpers,” he added. “An unconstitutional government is an illegal government.” Regimes operating extrajudicially have no legitimacy. America’s by far the worst.

State terror is official policy. So is rogue state lawlessness. It operates at home and abroad. Tyranny’s the law of the land. Diktat power rules.  FBI, DEA, Homeland Security, other repressive government agencies, and militarized local police collude. They’re America’s Gestapo. They operate extrajudicially.

[pullquote] Lindsey’s filthy alliance with “liberal” Chuck Schumer says more about the latter’s treachery than the former. [/pullquote]

US special forces death squads infest over 120 countries. They operate openly and covertly. CIA agents operate everywhere. They do so destructively. America’s no fit place to live in. It’s unsafe. Its long arm is repressive. Police state laws target nonbelievers. Rule of law principles don’t matter. Democracy’s an illusion. It’s a convenient fiction. Equity and justice are four-letter words. Freedom’s on the chopping block for elimination. It’s practically gone already.

Supporting right over wrong is criminalized. Espionage and other charges follow. Kangaroo court justice awaits. Bradley Manning’s victimized. He’s a world hero. He’s a 2013 Nobel Peace Prize nominee. He faces possible life in prison.

Edward Snowden’s a wanted man. He connected the dots for millions. He told them what they need to know. He’s heroic for doing so. He’s a 2014 Nobel Peace Prize nominee. He can’t go home again. He’ll be imprisoned, tortured, and abused. He’ll be denied all rights like Manning. America honors its worst. It persecutes its best. It bullies other countries. Obey or else.

On Thursday, Senate Appropriation Committee members unanimously approved sanctions on nations offering Snowden help. Doing so is lawless. It doesn’t matter.  Russia’s targeted. So are Bolivia, Nicaragua and Venezuela. More on Russia below. According to Venezuela Analysis, Washington has more than sanctions in mind.

VA headlined ” ‘Overwhelming’ Evidence of Plot to Assassinate Venezuela’s Maduro,” saying:

National Assembly head Diosdado Cabello has “hard evidence of assassination attempts.” He and Maduro are targeted. “We know who they are, what they are, what they want, and we will find them,” said Cabello. Maduro calls them “fascist” groups. They have “crazy plans.” Washington backs them.

“I have appointed Diosdado Cabello as (ruling PSUV political head) to find the truth of how they have prepared for attacks against me for months,” said Maduro. If either leader is killed, “the wrath of god and the people would be unstoppable,” he added.

Lindsey Graham (R. SC) represents the worst of Washington. He’s a right wing extremist. He’s a neocon rogue. He sponsored the Senate measure. It’s an appropriations bill amendment.

It’s a work in progress. It requires imposition of sanctions. It targets countries helping Snowden.

It directs John Kerry “to consult with the appropriate congressional committees on sanction options against any country that provides asylum to Mr. Snowden, including revocation or suspension of trade privileges and preferences.”

According to Graham:

“I don’t know if he’s going to stay in Russia forever. I don’t know where he’s going to go.”

“But I know this: That the right thing to do is to send him back home so he can face charges for the crimes he allegedly committed.”

Graham represents the worst of US ruthlessness. On July 19, his joint press release headlined “Graham, Schumer Resolution Encourages Russia to Turn Over Edward Snowden to American Authorities,” saying:

Both senators “introduced a partisan resolution.” It’s typical American bullying. It demands Russia hand over Snowden. Obey  or else.

It states:

“The Russian Federation’s continued willingness to provide shelter to Edward Snowden is negatively impacting the US-Russia relationship.”

“Russia should immediately turn Edward Snowden over to the appropriate United States authorities so he can stand trial in the United States.”

“President Obama should consider other options, including recommending a different location for the September 2013 G20 summit in St. Petersburg, Russia, should Russia continue to allow shelter for Mr. Snowden.”

According to Graham:

“On multiple fronts, Russia is becoming one of the bad actors in the world.”

“Russia continues to provide cover to the Iranian nuclear program and sell sophisticated weapons to the Assad regime in Syria to butcher tens of thousands of its own citizens.”

“For Russia to grant temporary asylum to Mr. Snowden on top of all this would do serious damage to our relationship.”

“It is past time we send a strong message to President Putin about Russia’s actions and this resolution will help accomplish that goal.”

Schumer is AIPAC’s man in Washington. He’s no democrat. He represents Israel. He supports its worst crimes. He backs Obama’s war on humanity.  He’s a war criminal multiple times over.

“Time and time again,” he said, “President Putin is too eager to stick a finger in the eye of the United States – whether it is arming the murderous Assad regime in Syria, supporting Iran’s nuclear development or now providing shelter and Russian state protection to Edward Snowden.”

“Enough is enough. It’s time to send a crystal clear message to President Putin about Russia’s deplorable behavior, and this resolution will do just that.”

Washington targets independent countries. Sanctions have no legitimacy. America imposes them ruthlessly. They’re unjustly punitive. They used to intimidate and bully nations into compliance. They don’t work. Russia’s strong enough to retaliate. It values good bilateral relations. It won’t sacrifice its sovereignty. It’s not for sale.

America’s a Big Brother society. It’s no longer fiction. It’s real. It’s institutionalized. It’s universal. It’s lawless. It doesn’t matter. It’s hard-wired. Manufactured national security threats override fundamental freedoms. Anyone can be monitored for any reason or none at all.

Privacy rights are lost. Patriot Act legislation authorized unchecked government surveillance powers. Everyone’s potentially watched. There’s no place to hide. Obama bears fully responsibility. He targets fundamental freedoms. He does so ruthlessly. He’s done it throughout his tenure. Constitutional rights don’t matter. America’s High Court supports him. So do congressional leaders.

On Wednesday, House members defeated a Defense Department appropriations bill amendment. It prohibited NSA from collecting bulk telephone metadata. It “requir(ed) the FISA court under (the Patriot Act’s) Sec. 215 to order the production of records that pertain only to a person under investigation.”

Voting was close. The measure nearly passed. It had bipartisan support. It was defeated 217 – 205. Obama strongly opposed it.  Heavy-handed administration tactics demanded congressional compliance. Ahead of the vote, NSA head General Keith Alexander met with congressional leaders.

He did so secretly. He was dispatched to bully and pressure. He got enough support to win. A White House press release was typical Obama.  Doublespeak duplicity headlined. Lies, damn lies, and ObamaSpeak said:

“In light of the recent unauthorized disclosures, the President has said that he welcomes a debate about how best to simultaneously safeguard both our national security and the privacy of our citizens.”

“The Administration has taken various proactive steps to advance this debate including the President’s meeting with the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, his public statements on the disclosed programs, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s release of its own public statements, ODNI General Counsel Bob Litt’s speech at Brookings, and ODNI’s decision to declassify and disclose publicly that the Administration filed an application with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.”

“We look forward to continuing to discuss these critical issues with the American people and the Congress.”

“However, we oppose the current effort in the House to hastily dismantle one of our Intelligence Community’s counterterrorism tools.”

“This blunt approach is not the product of an informed, open, or deliberative process.”

“We urge the House to reject the Amash Amendment, and instead move forward with an approach that appropriately takes into account the need for a reasoned review of what tools can best secure the nation.”

In other words, Obama demands continued lawless NSA spying. House members approved. For sure Senate ones would. According to Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) attorney Kurt Opsahl:

“This amendment reflected the deep discomfort of Americans who don’t want the government collecting data on them indiscriminately.”

“This type of surveillance is unnecessary and unconstitutional, a needless return to the general warrants that our country’s founders fought against.”

EFF’s Rainey Reitman added:

“We were heartened by the many supporters from across the country who called their representative to support the amendment, laying the foundation for further Congressional action to investigate the NSA spying and enact greater privacy protections.”

The fight for justice continues. First Unitarian v. NSA pursues it. EFF represents plaintiffs. Nineteen organizations, Los Angeles Unitarian Church groups and others filed suit.

NSA’s charged with violating First, Fourth and other constitutional rights. In early July, Northern District of California federal Judge Jeffrey White ruled for EFF.  He rejected Obama’s secret privilege claims. Doing so permits EFF’s Jewel v. NSA and Shubert v. Obama suits to proceed.

According to EFF’s Cindy Cohn:

“The court rightly found that the traditional legal system can determine the legality of the mass, dragnet surveillance of innocent Americans and rejected the government’s invocation of the state secrets privilege to have the case dismissed.”

“Over the last month, we came face-to-face with new details of mass, untargeted collection of phone and Internet records, substantially confirmed by the Director of National Intelligence.”

“Today’s decision sets the stage for finally getting a ruling that can stop the dragnet surveillance and restore Americans’ constitutional rights.”

In his ruling, Judge White said the heart of EFF’s suit isn’t a state secret. Classified details can be litigated. FISA Act provisions apply.

“Congress intended for FISA to displace the common law rules such as the state secrets privilege with regard to matter within FISA’s purview,” he explained.  EFF suits target lawless NSA spying. Millions of ordinary Americans are affected. Government officials remain unaccountable. Hard evidence document’s what’s intolerable.

“We will continue to push Congress to rein in unconstitutional surveillance,” said EFF. It’s Stopwatching.us campaign continues.  It targets police state lawlessness. It persists. It’s worse than ever. It threatens freedom everywhere. Occupy Wall Street is right. The only solution is world revolution. Regime change begins at home. It’s a national priority. It’s essential. The stakes are too high. Challenging extrajudicial authority’s essential.

Electoral politics doesn’t work. It never did. It doesn’t now. Monied interests rule. Politicians are bought like toothpaste. Duopoly power runs America. Vital change is necessary. Popular struggles matter. Sustained commitment works. Collective activism has power. What better time to use it than now.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached atlendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.  His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour




Guest Editorials: Emergency manager throws Detroit into bankruptcy

Even the bankruptcy of a major city in the richest nation in the world is an acceptable absurdity in the minds of idiotized publics accustomed to the rules of savage capitalism. 

By Jerry White,wsws.org
(The addenda provide further information on this topic, including the official view of the establishment, as filed by the New York Times.)

Kevyn Orr: another black face eagerly doing the dirty work for the establishment.

Corporate lawyer Kevyn Orr: another black face eagerly doing the dirty work for the establishment.

The emergency manager overseeing the financial restructuring of Detroit filed a petition in federal court Thursday afternoon throwing the devastated industrial city of 700,000 residents into Chapter 9 bankruptcy. Republican Governor Rick Snyder, who appointed Wall Street bankruptcy attorney Kevyn Orr as the city’s emergency manager last March, immediately approved the filing.

The largest municipal bankruptcy in US history paves the way for an unprecedented attack on the pensions and health care benefits of city workers, the further slashing of essential services, and the sell-off of public assets to pay the banks and bondholders who hold the city’s debt.

Announcing the filing, Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr stood side-by-side with the city’s Democratic mayor, David Bing, a multi-millionaire who has slashed the city workforce by 20 percent since taking office in 2009. Both cynically claimed that the bankruptcy would have little effect on daily life and would lead to improved services for city residents.

[pullquote] It’s understood by all establishment players that the corporate media should never question the grotesque policies and events emanating from the logic of “free enterprise.” [/pullquote]

The Obama administration signaled its support for the bankruptcy filing, issuing a statement Thursday declaring: “While leaders on the ground in Michigan and the city’s creditors understand that they must find a solution to Detroit’s serious financial challenge, we remain committed to continuing our strong partnership with Detroit as it works to recover and revitalize and maintain its status as one of America’s great cities.”

Orr has already approved a corporate-backed plan to shut off services to neighborhoods deemed too poor or under-populated for profitable private investment, while handing over public lighting, transportation, garbage collection and other services to for-profit companies. His “turnaround” team has appraised everything from the city’s water treatment plant and masterpieces at the Detroit Institute of Arts to Belle Isle Park and the animals at the Detroit Zoo for possible sale to private investors.

Above all, the bankruptcy filing clears the way to gut the pensions and health care benefits of the city’s 31,000 current and retired employees. By throwing the city into the bankruptcy courts, Orr intends to circumvent Michigan’s constitution, which declares public pensions to be a “contractual obligation” that “shall not be diminished or impaired.”

Orr rushed the bankruptcy filing to preempt lawsuits filed by pension trustees and public-sector unions seeking to block bankruptcy on the grounds that it would lead to unconstitutional pension cuts. Attorneys for Snyder reportedly asked the lawyers representing the pension funds for a five-minute delay before they sought a temporary restraining order to block the bankruptcy filing. During those five minutes, Orr’s attorneys filed the bankruptcy petition in Detroit.

At Thursday’s press conference, Orr gloated that the bankruptcy filing put an “automatic stay on all litigations,” adding, “We don’t have any time for more delaying tactics.”

Under a plan Orr previously outlined, pension trust funds would receive as little as 10 cents for every dollar owed to 21,000 retirees for a lifetime of labor. Orr wants to eliminate cost-of-living adjustments for retirees who receive as little as $500 to $1,000 a month, with no additional Social Security payments. He also intends to impose an immediate freeze on future pension payments and shift retirees to Medicare or privately controlled health care exchanges set to begin next year under the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act. The city’s current 9,700 workers will also see a huge reduction in health benefits and the loss of employer-paid pensions.

The Metro Detroit and Michigan AFL-CIO union federations and individual unions responded to the bankruptcy filing with predictable cowardice, insisting that workers take no action to defend their jobs and pensions and complaining that Orr had rebuffed their “good faith” negotiations.

“From the beginning, we have attempted to participate in discussions and offer a restructuring plan,” Dan McNamara, president of Local 344 of the Detroit Fire Fighters Association, said. “It is a shame that now we will have to be in front of a bankruptcy judge when all along we have been expecting to have meaningful meetings with Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr.”

Carl Anderson, president of Local 488 of the Utility Workers Union of America, sent an email to his members telling them to remain on their jobs. “It’s quite a shock,” he told the Detroit Free Press. “I thought it would not be until the first of the year once (Orr) talked to everybody and got everything in order. I thought it would take more time to get all the concessions.”

The only contractual obligations that will be honored by Orr are the billions of dollars in principal and interest demanded by the major Wall Street banks and bondholders. Orr has already made a settlement with UBS, Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Capital Services on $340 million in credit default swaps, giving them 75 cents on the dollar.

While private employers in the steel, auto, airline and other industries have long used the bankruptcy courts to tear up labor agreements, slash wages and escape pension obligations, the bankruptcy of Detroit is being used by the Obama administration and Wall Street as a test case to destroy the pensions and health care benefits of tens of millions of teachers, firefighters, public hospital workers and other state and municipal employees around the country.

“Officials in other financially troubled cities may feel encouraged to follow Detroit’s path, some experts say,” the New York Times wrote Thursday, citing Karol K. Denniston, a lawyer involved in the bankruptcy of Stockton, California. “If you end up with precedent that allows the restructuring of retirement benefits in bankruptcy court, that will make it an attractive option for cities. Detroit is going to be a huge test kitchen.”

At the press conference, Orr complained about unaffordable pension obligations, repeating what has become a constant refrain by the corporate-controlled media and Wall Street analysts, who incessantly speak of a nationwide crisis over “legacy costs.” In his self-serving and distorted overview of Detroit’s slide into insolvency, he cited “pension obligations” as the cause for the city’s increased borrowing.

In reality, the bankruptcy of Detroit, the former center of global auto production, is an expression of the protracted crisis and decay of American capitalism. At the center of this decline has been a decades-long process of deindustrialization, which has devastated former industrial centers such as Detroit, Chicago, Pittsburgh and scores of other cities.

The dismantling of US industry has gone hand in hand with tax cuts for big business and the rich and the increasingly dominant role of the most parasitic forms of financial speculation. As the accumulation of wealth by the ruling elite has become ever more detached from the creation of real value, a financial aristocracy has arisen whose operations are borderline-legal or outright criminal.

The tipping point for Detroit was the 2008 financial crash, which led to a wave of foreclosures, mass unemployment and a sharp decline in tax revenues and state and federal aid. The Wall Street banks have directly benefited from the indebtedness of the city, which pays a quarter billion dollars—or 20 percent of its annual operating budget—to service its debt.

Bankruptcy was not an inevitable process, but rather a deliberate policy. While handing over trillions of dollars to the Wall Street banks and driving up the stock market by pumping virtually free cash into the financial markets, the Obama administration has rejected any measures to bail out Detroit or other threatened state and municipal governments.

On the contrary, the Democratic president has used the financial crisis as an opportunity to carry out an historic restructuring of class relations, first through the destruction of the wages of auto workers in the 2009 auto bailout, then through the destruction of some 600,000 federal, state and municipal jobs, and now by means of a wholesale attack on pensions and health benefits.

While some “anticipate further benefit cuts for city workers and retirees, more reductions in services for residents, and a detrimental effect on future borrowing,” the Times noted, “others, including some Detroit business leaders who have seen a rise in private investment downtown despite the city’s larger struggles, said bankruptcy seemed the only choice left.”

While Orr insists there is no money for pensions or essential services, hundreds of millions in public dollars will be used to subsidize the development of an upscale housing, commercial and entertainment district covering about 7.2 out of the city’s 139 square miles. This includes $286 million in public funds for a new sports arena for the owner of Little Caesar’s Pizza and the Detroit Red Wings hockey franchise, Mike Ilitch, whose net worth is estimated at $2.7 billion. To make room for the arena, hundreds of low-income workers and seniors are being evicted from their downtown apartments.

The bankruptcy will bring devastation to the working class, but it will mean a huge windfall for Ilitch, Quicken Loan billionaire Dan Gilbert, and the gangs of bankruptcy lawyers, hedge fund operators and private speculators who will descend on Detroit to cash in on the carve-up of the former Motor City.

Jerry White is a senior political analyst with wsws.org, information arm of the Social Equality Party.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTARY by JERRY WHITE—

The social devastation of Detroit

18 July 2013

A vast social crime is being carried out in Detroit. Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr, appointed by Michigan Governor Rick Snyder to exercise a dictatorship over the city’s finances, is implementing an historic attack on the working class that will have devastating consequences for hundreds of thousands of people.

The destruction of Detroit workers’ pensions and health benefits, along with the gutting of fire protection, street lighting, sanitation and other elementary services, marks a new stage in the restructuring of American class relations that began with the financial collapse in 2008 and the multi-trillion-dollar bailout of the banks. The devastation of working class Detroit is setting a precedent for the entire country.

Bankers, bondholders and politicians are debating among themselves whether this operation can best be carried out through the bankruptcy courts, or whether greater reliance should be placed on the unions, which are more than willing to help impose these attacks on Detroit workers. A decision is expected this week. If Detroit declares bankruptcy, it will be the largest city to do so in US history.

Regardless of the tactic employed, the basic strategy is the same. Under Orr’s plan, pension trust funds will receive as little as 10 cents for every dollar owed by the city to retirees. Cost-of-living adjustments will be eliminated, future pension payments frozen, and retirees shifted to Medicare or privately controlled health care exchanges under Obama’s health care “reform.”

As a result, 30,000 active and retired workers will see their income and health coverage drastically reduced. These measures go well beyond the savage austerity cuts imposed on workers in Greece and other heavily indebted European countries.

It is of no consequence to the financial elite that Michigan’s constitution says public pensions are a “contractual obligation,” which “shall not be diminished or impaired.” Brushing this aside, Orr argues that federal bankruptcy laws trump state constitutional protections.

The only “contractual obligations” that will be honored are the billions of dollars in principle and interest demanded by the biggest Wall Street banks and bondholders. Orr has already made a settlement with UBS, Bank of America and Merrill Lynch Capital Services on $340 million in credit default swaps, giving these institutions 75 cents on the dollar.

According to some estimates, state and local governments nationwide have $1 trillion to $3 trillion in unfunded pension liabilities. If Wall Street is successful in robbing the workers of Detroit, the floodgates will be opened for the destruction of pension and health care benefits for tens of millions of teachers, firefighters, hospital workers and other state and municipal employees around the country.

The financial plan outlined by Orr for Detroit redefines the very structure of a modern city. Large portions of Detroit’s physical infrastructure—long neglected and allowed to decay—will be shut down.

Orr, a Wall Street bankruptcy lawyer, has approved a corporate-backed plan to cease services to areas of the city deemed too poor or under-populated for profitable investment. Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of dollars in public resources are being made available to subsidize the development of an upscale housing and entertainment district that will cover only 7.2 out of the city’s 139 square miles.

Transportation, garbage collection, street lighting and other essential services will be privatized, and public treasures, ranging from the masterpieces at the Detroit Institute of Art to the animals at the Detroit Zoo, may be put up for sale to private speculators and investors.

The dismantling of Detroit is the result of the protracted decay of American capitalism. The rise of the Motor City in the first half of the 20th century coincided with the growth of American industry and its global ascendancy. Its collapse follows decades of deindustrialization, the rise of the most parasitic forms of financial speculation, and the explosive growth of social inequality.

The first half of the last century also saw convulsive class struggles, the formation of industrial unions, and the attainment by American workers of significant social gains.

From the late 1970s onwards, however, the ruling class has waged unrelenting class war, carried out with particular vengeance in Detroit. As one congressional report during the Chrysler bailout of 1980 put it, the city was “known to have some of the most inefficient and troublesome workforces available.”

This war on the working class of Detroit was carried out with the collusion of the United Auto Workers. The UAW and other unions responded to the global integration of capitalist production by collaborating with the employers to suppress opposition to a drastic lowering of labor costs and the downsizing of industry. While workers have been driven back to conditions not seen since the 1930s, the UAW has integrated itself into the structure of corporate management and become a major shareholder and partner in the exploitation of workers.

At the head of the financial aristocracy that stands to benefit from the social counterrevolution which finds its sharpest expression in Detroit is the Obama administration. It oversaw the forced bankruptcy of Chrysler and General Motors, under which auto workers’ wages were cut in half and their benefits slashed, providing a model for what is now being carried out in Detroit. The Obama White House, which has from day one served as an instrument of Wall Street, sees the financial meltdown of the city as an opportunity to launch a new stage in its assault on the working class.

Social opposition by the working class in Detroit, as in countries around the world, is growing. The powerful traditions of social solidarity and class struggle have not disappeared. But this opposition must take a conscious political form.

The Socialist Equality Party and its mayoral candidate, D’Artagnan Collier, are fighting to mobilize the working class of Detroit to force out financial dictator Orr and replace the bankers’ City Council with a Council of Workers. This is part of the struggle to unite the working class and arm it with a revolutionary program to end the outmoded capitalist system and replace it with socialism.

Billions in Debt, Detroit Tumbles Into Insolvency

Fabrizio Costantini for The New York Times

The abandoned Brewster Wheeler housing projects, right, and the General Motors headquarters in downtown Detroit.

NYTimesLogo

By and Published: July 18, 2013 830 Comments

DETROIT — Detroit, the cradle of America’s automobile industry and once the nation’s fourth-most-populous city, filed for bankruptcy on Thursday, the largest American city ever to take such a course.

Multimedia
Graphic
Detroit’s Bankruptcy Is the Nation’s Largest

Related

National Twitter Logo.

Paul Sancya/Associated Press

Kevyn D. Orr, emergency manager, at a news conference on Thursday about the filing.

Fabrizio Costantini for The New York Times

An abandoned hydrant. City services have been cut before; fears are that the bankruptcy filing may lead to more cuts.

The decision, confirmed by officials after it trickled out in late afternoon news reports, also amounts to the largest municipal bankruptcy filing in American history in terms of debt.

“This is a difficult step, but the only viable option to address a problem that has been six decades in the making,” said Gov. Rick Snyder, who authorized the move after a recommendation from the emergency financial manager he had appointed to resolve Detroit’s dire financial situation.

Not everyone agrees how much Detroit owes, but Kevyn D. Orr, the emergency manager, has said the debt is likely to be $18 billion and perhaps as much as $20 billion.

For Detroit, the filing came as a painful reminder of a city’s rise and fall.

“It’s sad, but you could see the writing on the wall,” said Terence Tyson, a city worker who learned of the bankruptcy as he left his job at Detroit’s municipal building on Thursday evening. Like many there, he seemed to react with muted resignation and uncertainty about what lies ahead, but not surprise. “This has been coming for ages.”

Detroit expanded at a stunning rate in the first half of the 20th century with the arrival of the automobile industry, and then shrank away in recent decades at a similarly remarkable pace. A city of 1.8 million in 1950, it is now home to 700,000 people, as well as to tens of thousands of abandoned buildings, vacant lots and unlit streets.

From here, there is no road map for Detroit’s recovery, not least of all because municipal bankruptcies are rare. State officials said ordinary city business would carry on as before, even as city leaders take their case to a judge, first to prove that the city is so financially troubled as to be eligible for bankruptcy, and later to argue that Detroit’s creditors and representatives of city workers and municipal retirees ought to settle for less than they once expected.

Some bankruptcy experts and city leaders bemoaned the likely fallout from the filing, including the stigma. They anticipate further benefit cuts for city workers and retirees, more reductions in services for residents, and a detrimental effect on borrowing.

“For a struggling family I can see bankruptcy, but for a big city like this, can it really work?” said Diane Robinson, an office assistant who has worked for the city for 20 years. “What will happen to city retirees on fixed incomes?”

But others, including some Detroit business leaders who have seen a rise in private investment downtown despite the city’s larger struggles, said bankruptcy seemed the only choice left — and one that might finally lead to a desperately needed overhaul of city services and to a plan to pay off some reduced version of the overwhelming debts. In short, a new start.

“The worst thing we can do is ignore a problem,” said Sandy K. Baruah, president of the Detroit Regional Chamber. “We’re finally executing a fix.”

The decision to go to court signaled a breakdown after weeks of tense negotiations, in which Mr. Orr had been trying to persuade creditors to accept pennies on the dollar and unions to accept cuts in benefits.

All along, the state’s involvement — including Mr. Snyder’s decision to send in an emergency manager — has carried racial implications, setting off a wave of concerns for some in Detroit that the mostly white Republican-led state government was trying to seize control of Detroit, a Democratic city where more than 80 percent of residents are black.

The nature of Detroit’s situation ensures that it will be watched intensely by the municipal bond market, by public sector unions, and by leaders of other financially challenged cities around the country. Just over 60 cities, towns, villages and counties have filed under Chapter 9, the court proceeding used by municipalities, since the mid-1950s.

Leaders in Washington and in Lansing, the state capital, issued statements of concern late Thursday. A White House spokeswoman said President Obama and his senior team were closely monitoring the situation.

“While leaders on the ground in Michigan and the city’s creditors understand that they must find a solution to Detroit’s serious financial challenge, we remain committed to continuing our strong partnership with Detroit as it works to recover and revitalize and maintain its status as one of America’s great cities,” Amy Brundage, the spokeswoman, said in a statement.

The debt in Detroit dwarfs that of Jefferson County, Ala., which had been the nation’s largest municipal bankruptcy, having filed in 2011 with about $4 billion in debt. The population of Detroit, the largest city in Michigan, is more than twice that of Stockton, Calif., which filed for bankruptcy in 2012 and had been the nation’s most populous city to do so.

Other major cities, including New York and Cleveland in the 1970s and Philadelphia two decades later, have teetered near the edge of financial ruin, but ultimately found solutions other than federal court. Detroit’s struggle, experts say, is particularly dire because it is not limited to a single event or one failed financial deal, like the troubled sewer system largely responsible for Jefferson County’s downfall.

Instead, numerous factors over many years have brought Detroit to this point, including a shrunken tax base but still a huge, 139-square-mile city to maintain; overwhelming health care and pension costs; repeated efforts to manage mounting debts with still more borrowing; annual deficits in the city’s operating budget since 2008; and city services crippled by aged computer systems, poor record-keeping and widespread dysfunction.

All of that makes bankruptcy — a process that could take months, if not years, and is itself expected to be costly — particularly complex.

“It’s not enough to say, let’s reduce debt,” said James E. Spiotto, an expert in municipal bankruptcy at the law firm of Chapman and Cutler in Chicago. “At the end of the day, you need a real recovery plan. Otherwise you’re just going to repeat the whole thing over again.”

The municipal bond market will be paying particular attention to Detroit because of what it may mean for investing in general obligation bonds. In recent weeks, as Detroit officials have proposed paying off small fractions of what the city owes, they have indicated they intend to treat investors holding general obligation bonds as having no higher priority for payment than, for instance, city workers — a notion that conflicts with the conventions of the market, where general obligation bonds have been seen as among the safest investments and all but certain to be paid in full.

Leaders of public sector unions and municipal retirees around the nation will be focused on whether Detroit is permitted to slash pension benefits, despite a provision in the State Constitution that union leaders say bars such cuts.

Officials in other financially troubled cities may feel encouraged to follow Detroit’s path, some experts say. A rush of municipal bankruptcies appears unlikely, though, and leaders of other cities will want to see how this case turns out, particularly when it comes to pension and retiree health care costs, said Karol K. Denniston, a bankruptcy lawyer with Schiff Hardin who is advising a taxpayer group that came together in Stockton after its bankruptcy.

“If you end up with precedent that allows the restructuring of retirement benefits in bankruptcy court, that will make it an attractive option for cities,” Ms. Denniston said. “Detroit is going to be a huge test kitchen.”

Around this city, there was widespread uncertainty about what bankruptcy might really mean, now and in the long term. Officials said city workers were being sent letters, notifying them that city business would proceed as usual, from bills to permits. A hot line was planned for residents and others with questions and worries.

For some Detroiters, recent memories of bankruptcies by Chrysler and General Motors — and the re-emergence of those companies — appeared to have calmed nerves. But experts say corporate bankruptcy procedures are significantly different from municipal bankruptcies.

In municipal bankruptcies, for instance, the ability of judges to intervene in how a city is run is sharply limited. And municipal bankruptcies are a form of debt adjustment, as opposed to liquidation or reorganization.

Here, residents are likely to see little immediate change from the way the city has been run since March, when Mr. Orr arrived to oversee major decisions. A bankruptcy lawyer, he is widely expected to continue to run Detroit during a legal process. Mayor Dave Bing and Detroit’s elected City Council are still paid to hold office and are permitted to make decisions about day-to-day operations, though Mr. Orr could remove those powers.

Mr. Orr has said that as part of any restructuring he wants to spend about $1.25 billion on improving city infrastructure and services. But a major concern for Detroit residents remains the possibility that services, already severely lacking, might be further diminished in bankruptcy.

About 40 percent of the city’s streetlights do not work, a report from Mr. Orr’s office showed. More than half of Detroit’s parks have closed since 2008.

Monica Davey reported from Detroit, and Mary Williams Walsh from New York.

A version of this article appeared in print on July 19, 2013, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Billions in Debt, Detroit Tumbles Into Insolvency.

830 Comments

Share your thoughts.

Write a Comment
    • SW
    • San Francisco
    • Verified
    NYT Pick

    If no one is willing to accept reduced pension benefits, public salaries, existing services, etc., then perhaps the residents of Detroit should take responsibility for paying for what they do want by voting to raise their own sales, income and property taxes. As for the allegation that this is a racial issue, perhaps city residents would do well to get the chip off their shoulders and take responsibility for running a once great place into the ground. No one “did” this to Detroit.

      • Susan
      • Abuja, Nigeria
      NYT Pick

      This is so sad. A great American city — one of the most American American cities — is on the ropes. And what’s even sadder are all the comments spreading blame and snark. When did we all get so mean? When did we start only seeing things through the lens of finding someone (else) to blame? Detroit’s problems started long ago and are not particularly political in nature. The auto industry’s failure to initially meet the challenge from overseas…the export of manufacturing jobs to cheaper venues…a precipitous drop in population…it’s a long and complicated story. You can find Democrats to blame, you can find Republicans to blame, you can find people of every race and creed to blame. Does that make anyone feel better? Does that help the people of Detroit, who are really in the soup?




    Media courtesan Melissa Harris-Perry tells Snowden to give himself up

    MSNBC slut outdoing herself in the service of the empire. The very definition of a corporate Democratic apparatchik.  Way to go Melissa!
    Meanwhile, absent an acknowledgement, Gary Leupp sends his third open letter to the media diva—

    “Here’s the Deal”

    A Necessary Third Open Letter to Melissa Harris-Perry

    by GARY LEUPP

    Dear Melissa,

    I did not have access to MSNBC while in Asia over the past week. But the mother of a former student of mine, a very progressive woman, was thoughtful enough to pass on to me a clip of your “Open Letter” to Edward Snowden. It was only a partial clip and I’ve augmented it with text found online.

    I think I’ve accessed the whole thing, reprinted below with (necessary) comments.

    My first thought was that your Open Letter might be an indirect response to my two open letters to you, in which (in —what I thought was—principled, measured language), I took you to task for trashing a young man who did what he thought was right—exposing the degree of government surveillance of the people (of this country, and the world), taking actions that despite all your efforts and those of your media colleagues, most people in the U.S. see as appropriate whistle-blowing.

    But I would not want to indulge in narcissism. I am an insignificant, marginal figure in academia who occasionally writes for CounterPunch. I will assume you have not read my two letters and that they have in no way influenced your thinking.

    But anyway, just at the off-chance that during your busy schedule you’re paying attention…

    As you know, the Obama administration is deeply, deeply embarrassed by the Snowden revelations. It is indeed frightened by them, and by what is to come. Just today Glenn Greenwald—the Guardian journalist whom you ought to admire, because he is what you should and maybe could be (that is, a careful analyst of reality)—told an Argentine newspaper, “Snowden has enough information to cause harm to the U.S. government in a single minute than any other person has ever had. The U.S. government should be on its knees every day begging that nothing happen to Snowden, because if something does happen to him, all the information will be revealed and it could be its worst nightmare.”

    The information is not just in his laptops but has been distributed, apparently, insuring that the truth will eventually out.

    The nightmare is in mid-course as we speak. The Chinese, castigated by the U.S. for cyber-spying on the U.S., have learned that they themselves have been subject to infinitely greater violations. The Russians have learned that President Medvedev’s conversations were monitored. Germany’s Angela Merkel, who grew up in East Germany under Stasi rule, is outraged at the degree of U.S. spying on European allies. Normal people in this country are shocked that service providers Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube and Apple have been forced to share their metadata with the U.S. government.

    Has it not occurred to you that maybe this is all wrong? Why is it your instinct to rally to the side of the spy, and to attack the whistle-blower? Think about that, please.

    Do you think that just because Obama is, like yourself, half-African-American a new age has descended upon us, in which the U.S. government is suddenly good no matter what it does? No matter how much it continues the old badness, and in fact relentlessly builds upon it?

    Let us look at what you said in your Open Letter to honest Edward Snowden.

    “It’s me, Melissa. I hear you’re looking for a country. Well, wouldn’t you know, I have an idea for you! How about…this one? I know you’re not super pleased with the government these days–and I feel you. “

    Hmm….. Do you really feel for him, Melissa? It seems to me that what you feel for him is anger, and indignation that he has so embarrassed the president by exposing him as a Dick Cheney clone.

    And why the flippant tone? This is serious stuff, Melissa. Not a time for levity, much as I like your smile and excellent dental work.

    And isn’t it kind of narcissistic of  you to begin with “It’s me, Melissa”? Do you really suppose that in his Moscow exile (imposed by Obama, who’s willing to down planes to prevent his movement) Snowden is following your rich contributions to his story? Pleeeeease, Melissa.

    “The information you revealed about surveillance raises serious issues about the behaviors of our leaders and how they justify and hide those practices from the public.”

    Ok. That much is good. You have to say that, acknowledging “serious issues,” don’t you? Because the alternative would be to say you don’t care about “the behaviors of our leaders” (pre-eminently Obama) and the practices he hides. You have a liberal-progressive reputation to uphold, and somewhere in your head resides a small conscience uncomfortable with what you learned.

    But —dear Melissa—why haven’t you addressed any of those “serious issues”? Why have you devoted 99% of your energies to attacking the man raising those serious issues? Why are you so—as we say—“kiss-ass”? I just have to ask.

    “But, here is the deal: it’s time to come home and face the consequences of the actions for which you are so proud.”

    Who, Ms. Pomposity,  are you to tell him what “the deal” is, or what “consequences” he should face? Surely you have enough empathetic ability to—just as a thought experiment—put yourself in his place. He knows enough about justice in the land of Trayvon Martin to want to avoid the U.S. court process. He probably doesn’t crave life imprisonment. It’s all well and good for you to invoke models of civil disobedience such as Gandhi and Martin Luther King, but here we’re talking certain doom. And you from your pulpit of privilege are telling him to just accept that doom. Good job Prof. Harris-Perry.

    Ask your poli sci students if they agree with you on this shit. (They won’t.)

    Maybe your intentions were completely altruistic–it’s not that you wanted attention, but that you wanted us, the public, to know just how much information our government has about us. That is something worth talking about.”

    Well then, Melissa, why don’t you talk about it? Why do you avoid it? What’s the real story here? Criminal government misconduct, the vitiation of the Fourth Amendment, or one man’s whistle-blowing?

    And why, having conceded that the man’s intentions might be “completely altruistic” do you persistently without any evidence argue otherwise? Have you studied journalism at any point in your life?

    “But by engaging in this Tom Hanks-worthy, border-jumping drama through some of the world’s most totalitarian states, you’re making yourself the story.”

    Excuse me, Melissa, but Hong Kong is not “one of the world’s most totalitarian societies.” (Do you travel much? Have you been there?) I don’t like the term “totalitarian” because it is so imprecise, but I’d say it applies to a host of U.S.-backed regimes—including some recently established through U.S. military force—more than to Hong Kong or Russia.

    And how does a flight to Hong Kong and an interview with Glenn Greenwald, a respected constitutional and civil rights lawyer, author of three books about government violation of privacy rights, constitute “drama”? Or a subsequent civilian flight to Moscow in this post-Cold War era?

    “We could be talking about whether accessing and monitoring citizen information and communications is constitutional, or whether we should continue to allow a secret court to authorize secret warrants using secret legal opinions.

    But we’re not. We’re talking about you!”

    Well, Melissa, is the fact that you’re dwelling on him his fault? I personally find him quite self-effacing. And the volume of verbiage he’s devoted to himself since June 5 pales in comparison to the verbiage in your tirades against him.

    “And flight paths between Moscow and Venezuela, and how much of a jerk Glenn Greenwald is.”

    Excuse me. Who precisely is talking about Greenwald being a “jerk”? I certainly don’t think he is.  Several real jerks have called for him to be tried for treason. Are you on their side? If so, why?

    I understand that fascism appeals to some people for deep-seated psychological reasons, but…you?

    “We could at least be talking about whether the Obama administration is right that your leak jeopardized national security. But we’re not talking about that, Ed.

    We’re talking about you. I can imagine you’d say, well then stop! Just talk about something else. But here’s the problem, even if your initial leak didn’t compromise national security, your new cloak and dagger game is having real and tangible geopolitical consequences. So, well, we have to talk about…you.”

    Again: the fact that you, and others in the media, are talking about Snowden rather than his “leaks” is not his fault. Indeed he protested in one of his (few) communications since the Hong Kong interview that people were talking about his youth and his girlfriend rather than the issues of surveillance he put before the public.

    As for “geopolitical consequences”….why must you side with the Obama administration in its relations with the world? Do you think everyone in this country should identify with the State Department calls “national interest”? Have you ever participated in an antiwar demonstration? Sometimes I positively welcome setbacks to the State Department’s geopolitical goals. (Should I not have that right? Or should I, like you, automatically embrace those goals without even thinking about them?)

    “We’re talking about how maybe now you’re compromising national security by jumping from country to country, causing international incidents and straining U.S. relationships with Russia and China.”

    From country to country? There have been precisely two countries. He was urged to leave Chinese Hong Kong and did, and has been immobile in Sheremetyevo International Airport. Why are you exaggerating?

    And what do you mean by “national security”? Anyone using that intimidating term should define what it means, precisely. My security is not, in my mind, abetted by NSC surveillance of the population of Germany.

    “Causing international incidents?” How many? Of what nature? The man has taken two flights, dealt with two reactions in two countries, trying to be low-key. You make it sound like he’s setting off bombs.

    “Relations with Russia and China, really important relationships, and we’re talking about how you praised countries like Russia and Venezuela for standing against human rights violations and refusing to compromise their principles. Seriously, Ed, where do you even come up with that? What are you thinking?”

    Umm…I imagine he’s thinking it’s a good thing that Russia hasn’t handed him over to what you call U.S. “justice” both because he has violated no Russian law and because public opinion in Russia and globally is overwhelmingly on his side. And he’s appreciating the fact that Venezuela has expressed willingness to grant him asylum with fewer procedural steps than required by Nicaragua, Bolivia and Ecuador. Seriously, Melissa. Who’s writing your stuff?

    Your emotional rhetoric strikes me as an effort to really, really show how loyal you are to the system, to Obama, to Comcast. Is this a misinterpretation?

    “Now, I understand you don’t want to come back. I mean, to do so would be giving up your freedom. That’s [inaudible] trial and likely for several months or years or after. I get it! It’s prisons in the U.S. who commit actual human rights violations. We just talked about it. More than 80,000 prisoners are held in solitary confinement, some for years, some indefinitely, despite the fact that solitary is cruel and psychologically damaging.  I know.”

    Okay, fine. You’ve acknowledged a significant piece of the problem. You’ve shown you have some recognition of the horrors of the U.S. gulag. But didn’t you just answer your own question?

    Just how are you expecting to be persuasive here? Don’t you hear the contradictions swirling around in your head? Can you sleep with them there jangling, night after night?

    “Those aren’t the human rights violations though, Ed, that you were complaining about.” 

    Oh? I myself find a certain  continuity between placing people in inhuman prison conditions and raping their identities through metadata surveillance. It’s all bad. But what is your point, Melissa? That because Snowden is exposing (“complaining about”) government surveillance rather than prison conditions he should willingly submit himself to the U.S. prison system?

    You’re being weird, you know. You’re not making sense.

    “But you might have nothing to worry about anyway.”

    Might not? Like that’s good enough? Bolivia’s President Evo Morales “might not” have had anything to worry about making the normal flight from Moscow to La Paz. But something really unusual happened.

    “Because unlike most of the people in solitary confinement, including Bradley Manning on trial for giving data to Wikileaks, you’ve cultivated for yourself a level of celebrity and that celebrity itself may just act as the protection, a kind of—another kind of—cloak if you ever find yourself in a U.S. prison. You have made quite a spectacle of yourself, and the Obama administration will be very careful about how it treats you, unlike how states treat all those other prisoners. What’s goin’ on man? Then we can talk about something else.

    Sincerely, Melissa.”

    Please, Melissa! How in Snowden’s very occasional, restrained statements has this man you’ve decided to address in the familiar diminutive (“Ed”) cultivated “celebrity” for himself?

    Do you not understand that, in the first few days following his revelations, the spin-doctors incensed at his whistle-blowing, searching around in their fevered minds, opted to portray this very low-key guy as an ego-driven publicity seeker?

    I mean, you seem to be asking, by default: why else would a person in a position to know about what you yourself call “information…about surveillance [that] raises serious issues about the behaviors of our leaders and how they justify and hide those practices from the public” reveal that information, other than to draw attention to himself?

    Is there no such thing as old-fashioned morality? And selfless attention to what’s right? And in this case, doing the right thing at colossal personal cost?

    You’re not making sense, Melissa. All you’re doing is swearing a loyalty oath to people who do not deserve your loyalty. You’re known for fighting against harmful stereotypes of black women that make it difficult for them to assert their political rights. (Bravo.) But you are using your own rights and privileged access to the camera to promote the character assassination of a young man whose sole crime has been to offend “your” president—the one who has now eight times invoked the World War One-era “espionage” act to punish whistle-blowers.

    What’s goin’ on, woman?

    Shame on you, making a spectacle of yourself like this.

    Wake up and re-think, Melissa.

    With best wishes,

    Gary

    GARY LEUPP is Professor of History at Tufts University, and holds a secondary appointment in the Department of Religion. He is the author of Servants, Shophands and Laborers in in the Cities of Tokugawa JapanMale Colors: The Construction of Homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan; and Interracial Intimacy in Japan: Western Men and Japanese Women, 1543-1900. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion, (AK Press). He can be reached at: gleupp@granite.tufts.edu