Dr. Noam Chomsky breaks the set on war, imperialism and propaganda

RT’s Abby Martin interviews Noam Chomsky on current issues stemming from pseudo-democratic governance in the United States.

On this episode of Breaking the Set, Abby Martin talks to philosopher, linguist, professor, political critic and author of over 100 books Dr. Noam Chomsky about the Boston bombings, US terror inflicted abroad, drones, Obama’s rebranding of Bush administration policies, the National Defense Authorization Act, Holder v. Humanitarian Law, conventional wisdom, the evolution of media propaganda and education as a form of elite indoctrination




OpEds: The entire globe is a battlefield for Pentagon

By Pepe Escobar, RT.com 

AFP Photo / US Navy / MC2 Tony D. Curtis

AFP Photo / US Navy / MC2 Tony D. Curtis

Forget it; the Global War on Terror (GWOT) is not becoming more “democratic” – or even transparent.

US President Barack Obama now pledges to transfer the responsibility of the shadow ‘Drone Wars’ from the CIA to the Pentagon – so the US Congress is able to monitor it. 

Until virtually yesterday the Obama administration did not even recognize in public the existence of the shadow ‘Drone Wars’.

The Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) at the Pentagon – which would then be in charge of the‘Drone Wars’ – is bound to remain secret.

And the Pentagon is not exactly yearning to retouch its definition of a “militant”, a prime candidate to be‘target-assassinated’“any military-aged male in a strike zone”“Muslim” male, it goes without saying.

Obama’s rhetoric is one thing. His administration’s ‘Drone Wars’ are another thing entirely.

The President now insists GWOT is no longer a “boundless global war”.

That’s rhetoric. For the Pentagon, the “entire globe is a battlefield”.

That is the operative concept since the beginning of GWOT, and inbuilt in the Pentagon’s Full Spectrum Dominance doctrine.

And if the entire globe is a battlefield, all its causes and consequences are interconnected.

The rules of the game

What’s the difference between a British soldier (the UK is attached to GWOT via the “special relationship”), stationed at an army barracks, gruesomely hacked to death with a meat cleaver in a London street and a Syrian soldier beheaded/disemboweled/cannibalized in “rebel”-held territory by a mercenary Sunni jihadi?

The difference is that the Nigerian-British killer in London is a terrorist, and the jihadi in Syria is a freedom fighter.

What’s the difference between an alleged – never conclusively – proven Chechen-American principally responsible for the Boston bombing and a little Pashtun girl killed by a US drone in Waziristan?

The difference is that the Chechen-American is a terrorist, and the Pashtun girl is not even acknowledged by the Pentagon (and even if she was, she’d go down as “collateral damage”.)

And what if the “collateral damage” is a US citizen, as in Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, the 16-year-old son of Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, ‘target-assassinated‘ by a US drone in Yemen in October 2011?

It will take 19 months for the administration to admit he was “terminated” – but still with no justification attached.

GWOT’s rules of the game won’t change – no matter how soaring Obama’s rhetoric.

When the US – or “the West” – kills or ‘target-assassinates’ Muslim civilians, that’s never terrorism.

When Muslims supported by “the West” kill other Muslim civilians – as in Syria – they are not terrorists; they are Reaganesque “freedom fighters”.

When Muslims kill Western soldiers – as in London – they’re terrorists.

When Muslims happen to come from regime-changeable Iran and Syria’s government, not to mention Hezbollah, they are by definition terrorists.

And when Muslims are lingering in Guantanamo just because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time when the US invaded a Muslim country, they remain terrorists – the umpteenth Obama promise to close Guantanamo notwithstanding.

Obama listening to Medea Benjamin

U.S. President Barack Obama listens as Medea Benjamin, an activist from the organization called Code Pink, shouts at him while he speaks at the National Defense University May 23, 2013 in Washington, DC (Win McNamee / Getty Images / AFP)

Pick your favorite blowback

Take a look at the trailer of Dirty Warsfeaturing Jeremy Scahill’s investigation of Washington’s shadow war. Pay attention to what a Pashtun peasant says: “If the Americans do this again, we are ready to shed our blood fighting them”.

That’s blowback. And not only Pashtuns are ready – but pan-Arabs and Muslims born and bred in “the West”.
The new “lone wolf” catchphrase/hysteria barely identifies the future proliferation of Muslim individuals whose anger finally explodes.

They may not be affiliated with any al-Qaeda-style franchise or copycat. What they do embody is the notion that if “the West” can get away with killing Muslim civilians, there will be a price to pay.

That’s 1, 2, 3, one thousand blowbacks.

And reasons for a thousand blowbacks are piling up.

The Bush administration’s ‘Shock and Awe’ over Baghdad 10 years ago was Western terrorism inflicted on Iraq’s civilian population.

The ‘Drone Wars’ are Western terrorism inflicted on civilian populations from Yemen to Pakistan’s tribal areas.
The sanctions packages imposed for years on Iraq and later on Iran are slow-motion Western terrorism inflicted on civilian populations to “prepare” them for regime change.

Meanwhile “the West” simply won’t quit its ability to fabricate more blowbacks.

NATO’s war “liberated” Libya and turned it into a failed state. The result is Sahelistan; northern and western Africa on fire.

Suicide bombers in Niger have just attacked a military camp and a uranium mine operated by French company Areva.

Responsibility was claimed by Mokhtar Belmokhtar, a former leader of al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) who late last year formed the splinter group Signatories in Blood, then led the attack on a natural gas plant in Ain Amenas in Algeria last January, and later may – or rather may not – have been killed.

The bottom line is that the entire globe will remain a battlefield – a self-fulfilling Pentagon prophecy.

So many Belmokhtars to fight, so many Syrian jihadis to support, so many “al-Qaeda” to target-assassinate, so many Muslim lone wolves to track.

Obama’s rhetoric is just a show. GWOT is bound to remain a serpent biting its own tail, eagerly feeding itself till the end of time.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

By Pepe Escobar is the roving correspondent for Asia Times/Hong Kong, an analyst for RT and TomDispatch, and a frequent contributor to websites and radio shows ranging from the US to East Asia.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.




Why Obama Will Walk Away Unscathed by the Current Political Scandals

by Pascal Robert, Black Agenda Report

BarackObamaonPhone

Don’t worry about Barack Obama. He’s far too useful to the rulers of America to be derailed by scandal, or even a combination of scandals. “Obama’s neoliberal government giveaways to private corporations and mercenary foreign policy already make him too valuable to the guardians of American empire to have his presidency threatened.”

This article previously appeared in YourBlackWorld [8].

He is too effective at assuring the wealth gap metastasizes in growth while poverty is at its highest level since the early Sixties.”

I have a prediction about how the current scandals facing the Obama administration, from Benghazi, to the Associated Press intrusion, [9]to the IRS harassment of right wing groups, will resolve themselves: President Obama will walk away from all of these scandals completely unscathed. The worst that might possibly happen is that Eric Holder will be forced to resign.

In reality, even with all the friction Holder’s presence causes with Republicans, his exit should be no great loss to anyone on the left not plagued with the vapid diversity con game based on the politics of redemption, [10] which requires “brown and female faces in high places filling mercenary government spaces,” so the babies have people to look up to as role models. And this is what we think Dr. King died for?

In the face of Holder’s fecklessness on major issues – from investigating and prosecuting Banks [11] to his enabling of the FBI to infiltrate Occupy Wall Street [12], to his relentless willingness as a tool in the assault on Whistle blowers– [13] his presence won’t be missed.

You may ask, what would prompt me to be so sure that Obama will weather these controversies with minor damage, if any at all? Simple answer: Obama is the most valuable and important tool the guardians of American Empire have to implement the bone crushing agenda that must continue to be leveled against Americans at home and the world abroad for the benefit of the elite.

Obama is the most valuable and important tool the guardians of American Empire have.”

From increased militarization of the continent through putting U.S. troops in over 35 African countries [14], to creating a new military doctrine that allows America to attack a country and completely overthrow its regime without any perceived threats to U.S. interests out of the pure charade of humanitarian civilian concern as in Libya [15], to international war crimes throughdrone attacks [16] on women and children in countries not in any military theater of engagement with the United States, to sending dog whistles allowing Israel to not only belligerently attack Syria [17] without provocation, risking a World War III scenario [18] via Russia, China, and Iran, but also having his administration publicly give Israel license to attack Iran [19], the Obama administration’s ability to carry out the most deadening foreign policy agenda since the beginning of Bush’s War on Terror marks a profound milestone in American history.

Being able to do all this while having a Nobel Peace Prize, while simultaneously having black and brown folk fawning to have you speak at Black college graduations like Morehouse [20]College makes Obama’s utility as America’s “more effective evil” [21] presidential choice unquestionable.

And that is only the international front. Let’s not mention Obama’s endless neo-liberal assault on public education through his horrid “race to the top” initiative that has caused a national epidemic of public school closings and teacher firings [22] that some are even deeming as racist [23].

Compound that with his other neo-liberal private sector takeover via the beyond problematic Obamacare plan that already may deny millions of poor people coverage [24] while increasing Health Insurance costs over 30%. [25] Obama’s neoliberal government giveaways to private corporations and mercenary foreign policy already make him too valuable to the guardians of American empire to have his presidency threatened by these abuses of power that have been exposed.

Obama’s endless neo-liberal assault on public education caused a national epidemic of public school closings and teacher firings.”

Furthermore, we cannot forget Obama’s most important role as Wall Street’s personal protector [26], ensuring the banks maintain record profits in the age of austerity [27] after the sequester he demanded [28] chokes the life out of government function and he threatens to cut Social Security and Medicare [29] so that now he can wryly tout a worthless decrease in the budget deficit [30], while America is still mired in recession despite the illusion of recovery [31].

These are the reasons Obama shall be unscathed by these scandals. He is too effective at assuring the wealth gap metastasizes [32] in growth while poverty is at its highest amount since the early sixties [33]. Meanwhile, the Black community, who so blindly fawn over [34] his soul deadening policies, continue to cheer even as he puts Black Liberation heroine Assata Shakur on the FBI’s most wanted list. This is the “hope and change” we got in America’s first Black president.

I’ve used this quote by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in several articles when talking about Obama and the Black community. I find it relevant even now:

The majority of Negro political leaders do not ascend to prominence on the shoulders of mass support. Although genuinely popular leaders are now emerging, most are still selected by white leadership, elevated to position, supplied with resources and inevitably subjected to white control. The mass of Negroes nurtures a healthy suspicion toward this manufactured leader, who spends little time in persuading them that he embodies personal integrity, commitment and ability and offers few programs and less service. Tragically, he is in too many respects not a fighter for a new life but a figurehead of the old one.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.

Pascal Robert is an Iconoclastic Haitian American Lawyer, Blogger, and Online Activist for Haiti. For years his work appeared under the Blog Thought Merchant:http://thoughtmerchant.wordpress.com/ [35] He can be reached via twitter at: https://twitter.com/probert06 [36] @probert06 or thoughtmerchant@gmail.com. [37]


Source URL: http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/why-obama-will-walk-away-unscathed-current-political-scandals

Links:
[1] http://www.blackagendareport.com/category/education-public-education/race-top
[2] http://www.blackagendareport.com/taxonomy/term/1439
[3] http://www.blackagendareport.com/category/department-war/obama-nobel-prize
[4] http://www.blackagendareport.com/category/us-politics/irs-scandal
[5] http://www.blackagendareport.com/category/us-politics/benghazi-scandal
[6] http://www.blackagendareport.com/category/us-politics/ap-scandal
[7] http://www.blackagendareport.com/sites/www.blackagendareport.com/files/ObamaBlackHat.jpg
[8] http://www.yourblackworld.net/
[9] http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/05/obama-looks-to-do-damage-control-on-irs-benghazi-doj-seizures.html
[10] http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/peculiar-black-“politics-redemption”
[11] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/01/eric-holder-too-big-to-jail_n_2993401.html
[12] http://dailybail.com/home/rolling-stone-inside-the-fbi-plot-against-occupy.html
[13] http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/obama-war-press-whistleblowers-drones-223724346.html
[14] http://www.democracynow.org/2012/12/26/headlines/us_army_teams_heading_to_35_african_countries
[15] http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/15/irs-ap-benghanzi-not-real-scandals
[16] http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/12/pakistan-us-drone-strikes
[17] http://rt.com/op-edge/israel-syria-bombing-crook-894/
[18] http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/05/07/302328/obama-runs-risk-of-wwiii/
[19] http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2013/04/22/Hagel-Israel-has-unilateral-right-to-strike-Iran/UPI-81571366614000/
[20] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/02/morehouse-faces-controversy-over-obama-critics-role-in-graduation-ceremonies/
[21] http://youtu.be/el7YVZXnwdk
[22] https://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/01/16-4
[23] http://socialistworker.org/2013/03/26/behind-the-racist-school-closings-agenda
[24] http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/obamacare_glitch_may_exclude_poor_from_coverage/
[25] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/26/obamacare-medical-claims-costs_n_2956986.html
[26] http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/barack-obama-wall-street’s-perfect-manchurian-candidate
[27] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/23/austerity-wall-street_n_1690838.html
[28] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/william-k-black/obama-sequestration_b_2758602.html
[29] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/pascal-robert/why-nobody-should-be-surp_b_3041532.html
[30] http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/the-dwindling-deficit/
[31] http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-us-economy-in-crisis-recovery-is-an-illusion/5321394
[32] http://youtu.be/QPKKQnijnsM
[33] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2302997/U-S-sees-highest-poverty-spike-1960s-leaving-50-million-Americans-poor-government-cuts-billions-spending.html
[34] http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/how-can-blacks-love-obama-so-much-when-theyre-doing-so-bad
[35] http://thoughtmerchant.wordpress.com/
[36] https://twitter.com/probert06
[37] mailto:thoughtmerchant@gmail.com
[38] http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.blackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Fwhy-obama-will-walk-away-unscathed-current-political-scandals&linkname=Why%20Obama%20Will%20Walk%20Away%20Unscathed%20by%20the%20Current%20Political%20Scandals




The major sea change in media discussions of Obama and civil liberties

The controversies over the IRS and especially the AP phone records appear to have long-lasting effects

By ,  guardian.co.uk 

President Barack Obama

Barack Obama Photograph: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Due to the controversies over the IRS and (especially) the DOJ’s attack on AP’s news gathering process, media outlets have suddenly decided that President Obama has a very poor record on civil liberties, transparency, press freedoms, and a whole variety of other issues on which he based his first campaign. The first two paragraphs of this Washington Post article from yesterday, expressed in tones of recent epiphany, made me laugh audibly:

You don’t say! The Washington Post’s breaking news here is only about four years late. Back in mid-2010, ACLU executive director Anthony Romero, speaking about Obama’s civil liberties record at a progressive conference, put it this way: “I’m disgusted with this president.” In the spirit of optimism, one can adopt a “better-late-than-never” outlook regarding this newfound media awakening.

As a result of the last week, there is an undeniable and quite substantial sea change in how the establishment media is thinking and speaking about Obama. The ultimate purveyors of Beltway media conventional wisdom (CW), Politico’s Mike Allen and Jim Vandehei, published an article yesterday headlined “DC turns on Obama”, writing that “the town is turning on President Obama – and this is very bad news for this White House” and “reporters are tripping over themselves to condemn lies, bullying and shadiness in the Obama administration.” The Washington Post’s political reporter, Dan Balz, another CW bellwether, wrote that these controversies “reflect questions about the administration that predate the revelations of the past few days”. About the AP story, Balz wrote that “no one can recall anything as far-reaching as what the Justice Department apparently did in secretly gathering information about the work of AP journalists.”

This morning, the New York Times’ public editor Margaret Sullivan wrote about the AP story and the broader War on Whistleblowers, and said that Obama’s presidency is “turning out to be the administration of unprecedented secrecy and of unprecedented attacks on a free press.” She added:

editorialized today that “the Obama administration, which has a chilling zeal for investigating leaks and prosecuting leakers, has failed to offer a credible justification” for its “spying on the AP”; the NYT editors also quoted a letter from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press to Attorney General Holder stating that the AP spying “calls into question the very integrity” of the administration’s policy toward the press. The New Yorker this morning published an article by its general counsel, Lynn Oberlander, denouncing the DOJ’s conduct as “cowardly”; she wrote: “Even beyond the outrageous and overreaching action against the journalists, this is a blatant attempt to avoid the oversight function of the courts.” Former New York Times general counsel James Goodale, who represented the paper during its Pentagon Papers fight with the Nixon administration, said in an interview yesterday that Obama is worse than Nixon when it comes to press freedoms.

Those are all media venues generally sympathetic to and supportive of Obama. But this anger has infected even the most Obama-loyal circles. Journalist Jonathan Alter, who has literally written books using what he touts as his “unmatched access” that are paens to Obama’s greatness and Goodness, yesterday demanded: “Obama should simply apologize to the AP and its reporters. It’s the least he can do to show he still believes in the First Amendment.” Even at MSNBC, its most influential host, Rachel Maddow, broadcast a 20-minute segment vehemently condemning the Obama DOJ on the AP matter that featured an interview with an AP lawyer and used Nixon’s attacks on Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg as the historical context. Maddow then broadcast another segment on the IRS’ targeting of right-wing groups in which she correctly pointed out that there is no evidence of Obama’s personal role in that targeting but that it will create serious problems for his administration. Even Harry Reid – the Senate’s top Democrat –denounced the DOJ’s actions as “inexcusable”, saying “there is no way to justify this.”

[pullquote]

Leave to the side how morally grotesque it is to oppose rights assaults only when they affect you. The pragmatic point is that it is vital to oppose such assaults in the first instance no matter who is targeted because such assaults, when unopposed, become institutionalized. Once that happens, they are impossible to stop when – as inevitably occurs – they expand beyond the group originally targeted. We should have been seeing this type of media outrage over the last four years as the Obama administration targeted non-media groups with these kinds of abuses (to say nothing of the conduct of the Bush administration before that). It shouldn’t take an attack on media outlets for them to start caring this much. [/pullquote]

There are two significant points to make from these events. First, it is remarkable how media reactions to civil liberties assaults are shaped almost entirely by who the victims are. For years, the Obama administration has been engaged in pervasive spying on American Muslim communities and dissident groups. It demanded a reform-free renewal of the Patriot Act and the Fisa Amendments Act of 2008, both of which codify immense powers of warrantless eavesdropping, including ones that can be used against journalists. It has prosecuted double the number of whistleblowers under espionage statutes as all previous administrations combined, threatened to criminalize WikiLeaks, and abused Bradley Manning to the point that a formal UN investigation denounced his treatment as “cruel and inhuman”. (Italics ours.)

But, with a few noble exceptions, most major media outlets said little about any of this, except in those cases when they supported it. It took a direct and blatant attack on them for them to really get worked up, denounce these assaults, and acknowledge this administration’s true character. That is redolent of how the general public reacted with rage over privacy invasions only when new TSA airport searches targeted not just Muslims but themselves: what they perceive as “regular Americans”.  Or how former Democratic Rep. Jane Harman – once the most vocal defender of Bush’s vast warrantless eavesdropping programs – suddenly began sounding like a shrill and outraged privacy advocate once it was revealed that her own conversations with Aipac representatives were recorded by the government.

Leave to the side how morally grotesque it is to oppose rights assaults only when they affect you. The pragmatic point is that it is vital to oppose such assaults in the first instance no matter who is targeted because such assaults, when unopposed, become institutionalized. Once that happens, they are impossible to stop when – as inevitably occurs – they expand beyond the group originally targeted. We should have been seeing this type of media outrage over the last four years as the Obama administration targeted non-media groups with these kinds of abuses (to say nothing of the conduct of the Bush administration before that). It shouldn’t take an attack on media outlets for them to start caring this much.

Second, we yet again see one of the most significant aspects of the Obama legacy: the way in which it has transformed and degraded so many progressive precincts. Almost nobody is defending the DOJ’s breathtaking targeting of AP, and with good reason: as the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press made clear yesterday, it’s unprecedented:

printed an anonymous email accusing AP of engineering a “smear of Justice”. Worse, Media Matters this morning posted “talking points” designed to defend the DOJ in the AP matter that easily could have come directly from the White House and which sounded like Alberto Gonzales, arguing that “if the press compromised active counter-terror operations for a story that only tipped off the terrorists, that sounds like it should be investigated” and that “it was not acceptable when the Bush Administration exposed Valerie Plame working undercover to stop terrorists from attacking us. It is not acceptable when anonymous sources do it either.” It also sought to blame Republicans for defeating a bill to protect journalists without mentioning that Obama, once he became president, reversed his position on such bills and helped to defeat it. Meanwhile, the only outright, spirited, unqualified defense of the DOJ’s conduct toward AP that I’ve seen comes from a Media Matters employee and “liberal” blogger.

During the Bush years, it was conservatives who supported the Bush DOJ and Alberto Gonzales’ threats against the press on national security grounds; now, defenders of such threats to press freedoms are found almost exclusively from progressive [read: mainstream liberals] circles (similarly, many of the most vicious and vocal attacks on WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning have come from progressives [mainstream liberals, again, principally Obamabots]).

This is such an under-appreciated but crucial aspect of the Obama legacy. Recall back in 2008 that the CIA prepared a secret report (subsequently leaked to WikiLeaks) that presciently noted that the election of Barack Obama would be the most effective way to stem the tide of antiwar sentiment in western Europe, because it would put a pleasant, happy, progressive face on those wars and thus convert large numbers of Obama supporters from war opponents into war supporters. That, of course, is exactly what happened: not just in the realm of militarism but civil liberties and a whole variety of other issues. That has had the effect of transforming what were, just a few years ago, symbols of highly contentious right-wing radicalism into harmonious bipartisan consensus. That the most vocal defenders of this unprecedented government acquisition of journalists’ phone records comes from government-loyal progressives – reciting the standard slogans of National Security and Keeping Us Safe and The Terrorists – is a potent symbol indeed of this transformation.

Glenn Greenwald, an attorney and political blogger, writes for the Guardian (UK). His essays are published by many leading venues.  He’s certainly no mainstream liberal. 




Apple CEO defends multi-billion-dollar tax dodge

By Andre Damon, wsws.org

Apple CEO Tim Cook defends multi-billion-dollar tax dodge, and many in Congress back him up. A fraternity of filth shielded by their media.

Apple CEO Tim Cook defends multi-billion-dollar tax dodge, and many in Congress back him up. A fraternity of filth shielded by their media.

 

Apple CEO Tim Cook used his appearance Tuesday at a hearing of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations—called to investigate Apple’s evasion of billions of dollars in taxes—to call for a sharp reduction in the corporate tax rate. The senators on the committee, Democratic and Republican alike, agreed with Cook that the appropriate response to the systematic evasion of taxes carried out by Apple and other US corporations was to enact pro-corporate tax “reform.”

Cook’s appearance followed the publication Tuesday of a report by the committee showing that Apple, one of the world’s largest companies by market capitalization, pays almost no taxes on the bulk of its income. The report found that between 2009 and 2011, Apple paid only $21 million in taxes on all of its earnings outside the United States—an effective tax rate of 0.06 percent.

Apple managed to avoid paying taxes on its worldwide profits by funneling them through global subsidiaries, the main ones being based in Ireland, where the company pays a nominal corporate tax rate of 2 percent. The report found that in 2011, Apple posted 64 percent of its global pretax income in Ireland, a country that accounts for less than one percent of its global sales.

Since the United States bases a corporation’s tax nationality on the country where it is incorporated, and Ireland bases it on where a firm is managed, Apple’s subsidiaries were able to sidestep taxation in both countries by being incorporated in Ireland and managed in the US.

According to the Senate committee’s report, Apple used this gimmick to pay little or no taxes on at least $74 billion over the past four years. One of Apple’s Irish-based units, Apple Operations International, has not filed a tax return in any country for the past five years. The report said of this subsidiary: “Despite reporting net income of $30 billion over the four-year period 2009 to 2012… [it] paid no corporate income taxes to any national government during that period.”

By Apple’s own estimate, cited in the Senate report, the company avoided paying $9 billion in taxes in 2012. It paid only $6 billion in US taxes that year after reporting a record $41.7 billion in profit—an effective tax rate of less than 15 percent.

Apple CEO Cook was completely unapologetic at the hearing, saying, “We pay all the taxes we owe… Every single dollar. We not only comply with the laws, but we comply with the spirit of the laws.”

The Senate committee concluded as well that Apple had violated no laws by evading billions of dollars in taxes. To the extent that this is technically true, it only demonstrates the corrupt character of the entire tax structure, which is designed to allow major corporations to avoid paying taxes.

Cook went on to call for “comprehensive tax reform” that would slash the corporate tax rate while supposedly eliminating tax loopholes. He concluded his prepared remarks by saying, “Apple has recommended to the Obama administration and several members of Congress… to pass legislation that dramatically simplifies the US corporate tax system.”

Cook treated the senators with well-deserved contempt, knowing he had nothing to fear from them. They, in turn, treated Cook with cringing deference.

“Apple is a great company,” said the committee chairman, Carl Levin (Democrat of Michigan), at the beginning of his remarks. Other senators followed suit, heaping praise on the company. No one suggested that any sanctions, criminal or financial, be imposed, or that any action be taken to hold Cook and the company accountable for defrauding the American people.

Kentucky Republican Rand Paul openly defended Apple, presenting the firm as the victim of a federal tax structure that penalizes US corporations. “I’m offended by a $4 trillion government bullying, berating and badgering one of America’s greatest success stories,” he declared, and demanded that the committee “tell me what Apple’s done that is illegal.” He continued: “What we need to do is apologize to Apple and compliment them for the job-creation they’re doing.”

While major US corporations routinely move profits offshore to minimize their taxes, investigators told the committee that Apple was the first company they had seen that claimed a substantial portion of its profits was not taxable by any country.

Apple’s evasion of corporate taxes is not the exception for corporate America, it is the rule. In September, the same senate panel investigated tax avoidance by Apple’s competitors, Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard, which used similar methods to avoid paying billions of dollars in taxes.

General Electric paid an 11 percent effective tax rate in 2011, according to Citizens for Tax Justice, after paying negative taxes for the previous three years as a result of vast tax breaks given to US manufacturers.

The Senate report noted the correspondence between the expansion of the US federal debt and the decline in the effective corporate tax rate, noting, “At the same time the US federal debt has continued to grow—now surpassing $16 trillion—the US corporate tax base has continued to decline, placing a greater burden on individual taxpayers and future generations.”

The report quoted an earlier document from the Congressional Research Service that noted: “At its post-WWII peak in 1952, the corporate tax generated 32.1 percent of all federal tax revenue. In that same year, the individual tax accounted for 42.2 percent of federal revenue, and the payroll tax accounted for 9.7 percent of revenue. Today, the corporate tax accounts for 8.9 percent of federal tax revenue, whereas the individual and payroll taxes generate 41.5 percent and 40.0 percent, respectively, of federal revenue.”

As a result of this drastic reduction in corporate tax rates, individuals paid $1.1 trillion in federal taxes in 2011, while corporations paid only $181 billion.

The subcommittee report hinted at the vast scale of corporate offshore tax havens, noting that the “foreign profits of controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) of US multinationals significantly outpace the total GDP of some tax havens. For example, profits of CFCs in Bermuda were 645 percent and in the Cayman Islands were 546 percent as a percentage of GDP, respectively.”

According to a report released this month by Audit Analytics, US corporations’ overseas earnings hit a record $1.9 trillion in 2012. The total stockpile of these profits, which are not taxable in the US, has swelled by 70 percent over the last five years. Apple itself is sitting on a vast cash hoard of $145 billion, of which $102 billion is outside of the US and not subject to US corporate taxes.

Under pressure from shareholders demanding higher returns, Apple issued $17 billion in bonds earlier this month to pay dividends to investors rather than repatriate some of its offshore cash hoard, on which it would have had to pay taxes.

The Senate report highlights the role of corporations in driving up the deficit, which is universally presented as the burning issue facing the country. Yet there are no demands from any section of the political or media establishment that corporate profits derived from withholding taxes be seized. Instead, both parties demand the gutting of social programs upon which millions of working people depend, as well as the lowering of wages and slashing of health care and pensions.

This demonstrates the fact that the economic policies of the Obama administration and both parties are determined not by the so-called “national interest,” but by the class interests of the corporate-financial elite.

The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations’ report on Apple is only the latest in a series of reports by the panel documenting rampant corporate fraud and criminality, none of which have led to any serious consequences for the malefactors.

In 2011, the subcommittee issued a voluminous report on the 2008 Wall Street crash that documented fraud and violations of securities laws by Goldman Sachs and Deutsche bank, as well as collusion on the part of the credit ratings firms and government regulators. Earlier this year, the panel issued a report establishing that the top management of JPMorgan Chase, including Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon, concealed from the government and the public billions of dollars in speculative losses.

Thousands of pages of reports notwithstanding, not a single leading banker has been prosecuted for the criminal actions that led to the crash of 2008. On the contrary, this social layer has been rewarded with trillions of dollars in bank bailouts and cash infusions from the Federal Reserve.

Tuesday’s hearing makes clear that there is no way to end this vast looting operation outside of the restructuring of society and transformation of corporations into public enterprises under the democratic control of the working population.