MIDDLE EAST IN DEPTH WITH LAITH MAROUF – EPISODE 28 – BIDEN ADMIN TANGLED IN LIES

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


Garland Nixon


Resize text-+=


News 2739
  • If you approve of this article, please share it with your friends and kin.
  • Help us expand our reach. Defeat appalling hypocrisy. Lies cost countless lives.
  • We must act together to smash the VILE Western disinformation machine.
  • This is the Lying Machine that protects the greatest evil humanity has ever seen.
  • YOU know what we are talking about.


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. 

Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW



 

Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Morgan’s Lies Fuel Hatred, Divisions Worldwide

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


George Hazim
George’s Newsletter


Resize text-+=

Morgan’s Lies Fuel Hatred, Divisions Worldwide

There’s an undeniable level of stupidity about Piers Morgan that extends beyond the extremes of palpability.

Morgan is a shill on display - a fool for the world to see, but just as his stupidity is overwhelmingly consuming, Morgan is also dangerous.  Whether he recognises it or not, his voice is culpable of creating and inciting both evil and hatred.

Sitting Pretty: Morgan doing an interview with UK's PM in 2023

Morgan has become a figurehead in modern media for promoting skewed narratives that support Western imperialism and overlook the harsh realities of global conflicts. His platform, which claims to promote free speech and hard-hitting journalism, has instead perpetuated dangerous misinformation—particularly regarding the Ukraine-Russia war and the ongoing Israeli aggression against Lebanon and Palestine. It not only distorts facts but fuels racism, xenophobia, and the acceptance of genocidal policies, making him an increasingly dangerous voice in today’s media landscape.

His most recent interview with Professor John Mearsheimer underscores just how harmful his platform has become. Mearsheimer, a renowned international relations scholar, is well-known for his "realist" views on global power politics and his criticisms of NATO and US foreign policy. In the interview, Morgan consistently framed the Ukraine-Russia conflict in a simplistic, distorted narrative, disregarding the deeper historical and geopolitical context that Mearsheimer was attempting to highlight.


SIDEBAR
It's clear Morgan's vile dissembling stuns Mearsheimer.



Rather than offer an insightful debate or drawing attention to the complexities of the situation, Morgan used his platform to further propagate misleading, inflammatory rhetoric that reinforces Western interventionist policies and vilifies Russia.

One of the most significant failings of commentators like Morgan is their refusal to present the full truth behind the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Far from being a simple case of Russian aggression, Russia’s actions in Ukraine were a direct response to the mounting threat posed by NATO’s and the US’s encroachment on its borders. It’s a critical fact Morgan consistently ignores in his [intentionally] oversimplified framing of the conflict.

The US and NATO's push to place military forces and infrastructure right on Russia’s doorstep was an existential threat to Russian security. For years, Russia warned against NATO's expansion and the possibility of Ukraine becoming a NATO member—an outcome that would have effectively surrounded Russia with hostile forces. These warnings were repeatedly dismissed by the West, leaving Russia with no choice but to defend its national security interests. To portray Russia's actions as unprovoked aggression, as Morgan does in his interview with Mearsheimer, is a gross misrepresentation of the geopolitical realities at play.  (Not to mention an indecent lack of elementary fairness.—Ed)

Mearsheimer attempted to bring attention to these critical details, emphasising that NATO’s expansion and the West's disregard for Russian security concerns were pivotal factors in the escalation of the conflict. However, Morgan largely dismissed or downplayed these points, insisting on a narrative that positions Russia as the sole aggressor, while painting the West as innocent defenders of democracy. His one-sided portrayal not only distorts the truth but also exacerbates anti-Russian sentiment, contributing to the growing tide of Russophobia in the West.

By refusing to engage with the complexities of the situation, Morgan’s coverage encourages a dangerous form of jingoism that could escalate international tensions even further.


Piers Morgan with wives

Piers' wives: Morgan showing off his reward for being an establishment shill. (TGP screenshot)


Morgan’s distortion of facts is not limited to the Ukraine-Russia conflict. When it comes to Israel’s ongoing aggression against Lebanon and Palestine, Morgan’s narrative is equally dangerous and one-sided. Israel’s repeated military assaults on Lebanon, particularly its frequent air raids, are acts of aggression that violate international law and terrorize civilians. These attacks are not defensive measures, as Morgan often suggests, but calculated efforts to maintain Israeli dominance in the region and suppress resistance to its occupation.

In his interview with Mearsheimer, Morgan missed yet another opportunity to delve into the realities of Israel’s constant military aggression, especially toward Lebanon and its pager terrorism attack. Hezbollah, a resistance movement that emerged in response to Israel's brutal occupation of Lebanon, is often vilified in Western media as a terrorist organisation. In reality, Hezbollah plays a critical role in defending Lebanon's sovereignty and protecting Palestinian civilians from Israel’s ongoing atrocities. However, Morgan, like much of the Western media, continues to downplay Israel's repeated violations of Lebanese and Palestinian rights while framing any act of defense by Hezbollah or Palestinian resistance as terrorism.

By refusing to acknowledge Israel’s role as an aggressor, Morgan perpetuates a disturbingly dangerous narrative that dehumanises Palestinians and Lebanese civilians. His interview with Mearsheimer could have explored the nuances of Hezbollah’s role in defending Lebanon and the reasons behind Palestinian resistance, but instead, Morgan clung to simplistic, inflammatory rhetoric that ignores the root causes of the conflict.

But perhaps the most glaring failure of Morgan’s commentary lies in his treatment of the Israeli occupation of Gaza. The situation in Gaza is not merely a conflict—it is a genocide. Israel’s blockade of Gaza, combined with its frequent military assaults, has created one of the worst humanitarian crises in modern history. The people of Gaza are living in an open-air prison, subjected to continuous airstrikes, economic deprivation, and systemic violence. Yet Morgan consistently downplays this reality, framing Palestinian resistance as terrorism while ignoring the root causes of their struggle.

Mearsheimer's academic perspective, which could have illuminated the broader context of Israeli apartheid and the genocide in Gaza, was side-stepped in the interview. Morgan's refusal to discuss or even acknowledge Israel’s genocidal actions in Gaza highlights how his platform is complicit in the normalisation of war crimes. By choosing to frame Palestinians as aggressors without addressing the overwhelming brutality they face, Morgan erases the suffering of millions and contributes to the ongoing global indifference to Palestinian genocide.

The most troubling aspect of Morgan’s media presence is the influence he wields over public opinion. His platform reaches millions, and his narratives are often accepted without question by his audience. By presenting biased and untruthful accounts of these complex geopolitical issues, Morgan is not just misleading his viewers—he is helping to shape a dangerous and racist worldview that fuels hatred and division.

Morgan’s most recent interview with Mearsheimer serves as a prime example of how media figures like him perpetuate dangerously simplified narratives that contribute to global instability. His refusal to engage with the real causes of the Ukraine-Russia conflict or acknowledge the legitimacy of Palestinian and Lebanese resistance movements only serves to reinforce Western imperialist agendas and dehumanise those who suffer under occupation and aggression.

Morgan’s one-sided portrayal of Ukraine, Israel, and Palestine distorts the truth in ways that dehumanize entire populations. His rhetoric stokes anti-Russian sentiment, fuels Islamophobia, and downplays the ongoing genocide in Gaza. This kind of reporting is not just irresponsible—it is dangerous.

The remedy for voices like Morgan is responsible journalism—journalism that presents the full picture, acknowledges the complexities of geopolitical conflicts, and refuses to simplify issues into good-versus-evil narratives. The role of the media should be to inform, not to incite hatred or support imperialist agendas.


George’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




GEORGE GALLOWAY INTERVIEW: Oprah and ‘the craziest interview of my life’: Nick Cruse

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


George Galloway
chats with 
RBN's NICK CRUSE


Resize text-+=



Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Climate Change & Global Warming Debunked by Mainstream Media

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


SL KANTHAN
OpEds


Resize text-+=

EDITOR'S REMINDER: Whatever the truth about "climate change", there is absolutely no denying the dreadful environmental effects of reckless anthropogenic activity on the planet in the last 250 years. Just think what we have done to the Amazonian rainforest, the oceans (massive dumps for plastic junk, industrial refuse, etc.), or the Gulf of Mexico—every single day at risk of another "BP disaster". Not to mention the vast ecoanimal destruction. Overall, as a proud Indian who wishes to see his nation make more rapid strides in the "development" aspect, and a member of the country with the largest population, he obviously has an emotional stake in debunking the climate science advice promulgated by the WEF and similar globalist cabals. And he is absolutely correct in his criticism of the billionaire class's enormous hypocrisy, which he lucidly sums up in his closing paragraphs.

Climate Change & Global Warming Debunked by Mainstream Media

A surprising chart from Washington Post

Take a look at the chart, which shows the earth’s temperature over the last (nearly) 500 million years:

Scientists have captured Earth’s climate over the last 485 million years


This chart reveals three facts that destroy some core principles of climate change narrative:

  1. Climate always changes: Look at the chart and you see that the global temperature varies from 50 degree F to 95 degree F. Yes. It seems simple, but just the phrase “climate CHANGE” is a stupid marketing term, which implies that climate is not supposed to change and our weather/climate should be like a hotel room with an air conditioner and heater. And now we are told to lose our head because the earth’s temperature has increased by TWO degree F over the last 175 years!

  2. Temperature changes without human activity or industrial CO2 emissions: All the hysteria about “anthropogenic” global warming is nonsense, as we can see that nature has its own way. For 500 million years, temperatures went up and down even though there were no coal plants, cars, industries, farting cows etc.

  3. We are at the COLDEST point in 500 million years: Look at the chart again and you see that we are living in the coldest period! How’s that possible when we are repeatedly told by sensational headlines that every year is the hottest year on record? It’s because they are lying through omissions. They are using the year 1880 as a reference. Everything about the global warming is based on cherry-picked data.

Also, if you look at the temperature over the last 1 million years, you see much clearer cycles of global warming and global cooling. This is the reality of earth. Up and down, up and down.



Modern science is very reductionist and is also heavily influenced by billionaires, globalists, corporations and politicians. They pay scientists to rig the data and logic.

The reductionist approach in modern science is also why nutrition, psychiatry, Big Pharma and much of healthcare are inherently wrong.

The fear about fat and saturated fat are as ridiculous and misguided as the fear of CO2.

To have doctors who specialize in various parts of the body is very dumb, since all organs of the body are inherently connected.

To try to discover a gene for specific function or disease is also almost always absurd. (There seem to be a handful of exceptions).

Treating the world as a machine, worked to some extent in the beginning of industrial revolution. But that approach has limits.

We can see how artificial intelligence is so hard, even with models trained with 100,000 GPUs. When someone asked OpenAI, “Can my mother marry my father,” the AI responded, “In many countries, marriage within family members is prohibited”!

Conclusion

So, why did the globalists decide to spread the climate change propaganda? It’s probably a tool to hamper the growth of developing nations and to control the world’s population.

—S.L. Kanthan
Geopolitical analyst, columnist, blogger, author, podcaster.


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS




Pager Attack Presages Doom

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


OLIVER BOYD-BARRETT



Resize text-+=


There have been widespread media reports this morning of Tuesday September 17 (California time) that hundreds of handheld pagers exploded nearly simultaneously across Lebanon and in parts of Syria on Tuesday, killing at least eight people, and wounding some 2,700 people, at least 200 of them seriously. Victims have included members of Hezbollah. The Iranian ambassador to Lebanon was wounded.

Associated Press cites a member of Hezbollah to the effect that the new brand of handheld pagers used by the group first heated up, then exploded. According to this source, new pagers that Hezbollah members were carrying had lithium batteries that apparently exploded. Associated Press explains that lithium batteries, when overheated, can smoke, melt and even catch on fire. They can burn up to 590 C (1,100 F).

There are reports of social media images from Beirut’s southern suburbs that show people lying on the pavement with wounds on their hands or near their pants pockets. Emergency rooms in this impoverished country are said to be overloaded with patients, many of them with injuries to their limbs, some in serious condition.

Implications for Immediate War

The presumed aggressor is Israel which, in recent days, has been taking steps in preparation for an air and ground assault on Southern Lebanon, in order to make it possible, Israel claims, for Israeli settlers to return to the northern territories above Gaza from which they have been previously evacuated (and put up in hotels across Israel at enormous government expense), and to attack Hezbollah, and - I would add, as a personal opinion - to seize territory in partial fulfilment of the Zionist ambition of a greater Israel.

Netanyahu, his government, and Israel’s citizens may have been rattled by what was in some quarters reported to have been a hypersonic missile attack on Ben Gurion airport, fired a couple of days ago by none other than the Houthis in Yemen - Palestine’s bravest supporters by far. First reports said that the missile, having evaded Israel’s not-so-iron dome, landed in a forested area outside of the airport, but I note that in interview on Monday with Judge Napolitano, Alastair Crooke opined that Israel might be attempting to hide the fact of significant damage to airport facilities.

In order to bring about the invasion of Lebanon as quickly as possible in the face of significant IDF resistance and sensible doubts as to the sanity of Netanyahu and his closest colleagues (one of whom, national security minister Ben Gvir, controls a two-ten thousand strong settler militia in the West Bank), Netanyahu ealier this week was reportedly signalling his intent to replace his defense minister Yoav Gallant in favor of somebody more amenable to Zionist aspirations. In his latest comments Gallant now appears to be going out of his way to prepare for the invasion.

This incident has the gravest possible significance. It has blind-sided Hezbollah on the very eve of a war that Israel has declared on Hezbollah. If, as seems possible, Hezbollah defenses are significantly impaired as a result, then of course the anticipated Israeli assault has more chance of winning. That possible eventuality, its probable chances now greater than before, may be sufficient to force Iran’s hand in the defense of Hezbollah and, also, Lebanon and Syria, igniting the regional war that Netanayu badly wants.

UN General Assembly

An excellent analysis today by Medea Benajamin and Nicolas Davis and available on Countercurrents, notes that tomorrow, September 18th, the UN General Assembly is scheduled to debate and vote on a resolution that Israel to end “its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory” within six months.

Assuming that Israel will ignore any such demand, and that the US vetoes a Security Council resolution to enforce the ICJ ruling of July 19 which found Israeli settlements are being maintained in violation of international law and that Israel should pay restitution to all those whom its illegal occupation has harmed, the General Assembly could convene an Emergency Session to take up what is called a Uniting For Peace resolution. This could:

“call for an arms embargo, an economic boycott or other UN sanctions against Israel – or even call for actions against the United States. Uniting for Peace resolutions have only been passed by the General Assembly five times since the procedure was first adopted in 1950.”

Passage of a General Assembly resolution by a large majority of members would:

“demonstrate that countries all over the world support the ICJ ruling, and would be a small but important first step toward ensuring that Israel must live up to those obligations...

“Whether the United States can still coerce or browbeat a few of its traditional allies into rejecting or abstaining from the General Assembly resolution on September 18 will be a test of its residual “soft power.”

The US to date has vetoed 46 UN Security Council resolutions that “either required Israel to comply with international law, called for an end to the occupation or for Palestinian statehood, or held Israel accountable for war crimes or illegal settlement building”.

“The ability of one Permanent Member of the Security Council to use its veto to block the rule of international law and the will of the rest of the world has always been widely recognized as the fatal flaw in the existing structure of the UN system. 

the veto would “effectively put an end to any idea of international democracy… The Five would thus retain forever the freedom of maneuver that would be forever denied the others.”

The authors note that while the US pretends, with rapidly diminishing credibility, to be acting as an honest broker in the conflict, it does everything in its power to prevent a ceasefire and to support the continuing extermination of the Palestinian people. China, on the other hand, having a very practical interest in the region because of its significant dependence on Middle Eastern oil supplies, invited Hamas, Fatah and 12 other Palestinian groups to a three-day meeting in Beijing in July, where a “national unity” plan was agreed to form a post-war “interim national reconciliation government.” This would oversee relief and rebuilding in Gaza and organize a national Palestinian election to seat a new elected government.

Israel meanwhile has declared its intent to promote it own, Israel, governor of Gaza.

145 of the UN’s 193 nations “have now recognized Palestine as a sovereign nation comprising Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and even more countries have voted for resolutions to end the occupation, prohibit Israeli settlements and support Palestinian self-determination and human rights”.

Assassinating Trump Poorly

Ryan Routh Trump Shooter

Ryan W. Routh apprehended right after assassination attempt on Sept 16, 2024


The latest alleged assassination attempt on Presidential candidate Donald Trump has implicated an American enthusiast for Ukraine, one previously involved in trying to recruit Americans and others to fight Russia alongside Ukrainians.

The assassin’s presumed rationale, not unlikely, is that were Trump to win the US election then he would quickly wind down US aid packages and force a negotiated outcome to the war. We don’t altogether know exactly how Trump intends to force Russia to the negotiating table short of threatening enhanced NATO aggression against Russia which would, of course, be a continuation of the same old same old in a context in which Russia is winning on the battlefields against Ukraine and successfully attriting Western armaments, even as the West hurtles with grossly insufficient capacity towards a three front war against Russia, Iran and China.

I note with some suspicion how conveniently the reputation of the Secret Service is salvaged by the quick witted reaction, according to some reports, of an advance spotter who noticed the barrel of a Kalashnikov 47 on Trump’s Florida golf course, even as the Biden administration reportedly continues to withhold from Trump the same degree of protection as Biden receives.

These injustices, which leave Trump supporters distraught, do not distract from the reality that Trump has threatened to dismantle US democracy, continues to insist on the basic of very insufficient evidence that he won the last election, a man who has helped incite an invasion of Capitol Hill, and who gives one very reasonable cause to doubt that he will respect the results of any election that does not go his way.

As dangerous as the Democrats are to the world (having brought us now, on several occasions, to the precipice of nuclear war), I believe that Trump is dangerous, first of all, to America, and then to the world. While he may seem moderate on Ukraine, he is a passionate supporter of Israel, and is extreme on China. His past record demonstrates an extraordinary degree of selfish, amoral, plutocratic, superficial, and erratic judgment.

BBC Crushes

I note that the BBC has initiated an adoring three-part series, “The Zelenskiy Story,” in an attempt to obscure the extraordinary silliness of the Brish crush, still vibrant today, on the last great British imperialist, Winston Churchill, by venerating Churchill’s supposedly latest and very un-British apparition in Ukraine.

The facts remain that Zelenskiy is a comedian of very modest talents and a simplistic neolibersl who was adopted and pushed to power in 2018 by a Ukrainian oligarch, and who won the election by promising “peace” with Russia and the end to corruption in Ukraine.

That Zelenskiy’s main objective, in the face of declining popularity after the election, was the apparent holy grail of Ukrainian membership of NATO - a status that is still today denied to Ukraine and opposed by many if not most NATO members even as they pretend to be looking forward to Ukraine’s joining at some invisible future point when conditions are right - certainly raises the spectre, as Scott Ritter did a year ago, that Zelenskiy has always been a tool of Western intelligence (recall that the CIA had already established 11 stations in Ukraine in collaboration with Ukraine’s SBU, and a significant number of biological warfare labs close to the border with Russia, seemingly admitted by Victoria Nuland).

Far from being an agent of peace, Zelenskiy was complicit with NATO and EU powers in sabotaging the one true path to peace that had previously been agreed through the Minsk agreements of 2014 and 2015. In other words, he sustained the policies of the coup regime installed into power with the muscle of Banderite fascists by the West in 2014.

Exploiting generous “non-lethal” Western aid he continued to fortify Ukraine’s military lines along the self-declared people’s republics of Luhansk and Donetsk (who had only ever wanted greater autonomy within Ukraine). He embraced the idea of NATO weapons in Ukraine, including nuclear capability. He pursued “cancel Russia” cultural policies. he has pretty much sold out his country’s future to the likes of Western investment capital representative Blackrock.

His forces were poised to invade the people’s republics ahead of Russia’s now necessary SMO. He reneged on a peace agreement whose draft had already been initialled by Russian and Ukrainian negotiators in Istanbul in March 2022. But not before he allowed himself to be pressured by Boris Johnson, representing NATO, into sabotaging that agreementm and not before he helped the West fool Russia into withdrawing the troops with which it had encircled Kiev, in the belief that peace had been achieved.

He then relentlessly pursued a conflict which has killed and seriously wounded many hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians (I am inclined to guesstimate a million at least), that has seen millions (five?) of Ukrainians leave the country and at least an equally large number of Ukrainians who have been forced to migrate internally. His army and his weapons have been seriously attrited. He lost constitutional legitimacy as President when he refused last year to allow - and continues to refuse to allow - presidential elections. He rules, therefore, as an unelected dictator, a dictator who has wiped out free speech in Ukraine, whose regime murders, tortures and harasses dissidents, and which has closed down the counry’s principal spiritual habitus, the Russian Orthodox Church.

This is the man whom the BBC - effectively, if not legally, a State-manipulated propaganda poodle of a Washington poodle - has decided to glorify. I dont think I shall be watching it any time soon.


Empire, Communication and NATO Wars is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts, other benefits, and to support my work, please consider upgrading to a paid subscription if you have not already done so. Thank you!


Lili News 029
  • In cynicism and power, the US propaganda machine easily surpasses Orwells Ministry of Truth.
  • Now the fight against anti-semitism is being weaponised as a new sanctimonious McCarthyism.
  • Unless opposed, neither justice nor our Constitutional right to Free Speech will survive this assault.


RSS
Follow by Email
Telegram
WhatsApp
Reddit
URL has been copied successfully!
window.addEventListener("sfsi_functions_loaded", function() { if (typeof sfsi_widget_set == "function") { sfsi_widget_set(); } });


Print this article

The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License • 
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS