RICK STERLING—Mainstream media and pundits are already promoting Joe Biden. Syndicated columnist EJ Dionne, a Democratic establishment favorite, is indicative. In his article “Can Biden be the helmsman who gets us past the storm?” Dionne speaks of the “strength he (Biden) brings” and the “comfort he creates”. In the same vein, Andrew Sullivan pushes Biden in his article “Why Joe Biden Might be the Best to Beat Trump“. Sullivan thinks that Biden has appeal in the working class because he joked about claims he is too ‘hands on’. But while Biden may be tight with AFL-CIO leadership, he is closely associated with highly unpopular neoliberal trade deals which have resulted in manufacturing decline.The establishment bias for Biden is matched by the bias against Democratic Party candidates who directly challenge Wall Street and US foreign policy. On Wall Street, that would be Bernie Sanders. On foreign policy, that is Tulsi Gabbard.
ELECTION 2016
-
-
PATRICE GREANVILLE—The Russiagate affair has been from the start a hoax, concocted at the highest levels of the DNC/Deep State echelons, with Hillary Clinton and her supporting mob deeply involved—criminally—in almost all the pathetic shenanigans that have hijacked the nation’s attention since the early days of the 2016 election. Quite probably, none of this would have succeeded to the vile extent it has (the whole scheme being a crude and in some ways ridiculous Rube Goldberg fabrication with a multitude of clumsy moving parts), without the totalitarian support of the DNC/Deep State media minions, a prostituted crowd whose deeds deserve urgent and ample exposure. The object of this conspiracy—as almost everyone half awake should know by now, was assuring the ascendancy of Hillary Clinton to the imperial throne in 2016.
-
BRIAN CLOUGHLEY—onald Trump is a narcissistic boor who tells lies with a casual indifference that might be regarded with amusement (“My father is German, was German, born in a very wonderful place in Germany”) were he not a malevolent poseur with all the style and attraction of a sock full of wet spaghetti. He is a spiteful mendacious buffoon whose views and actions on international and domestic affairs are confused, erratic and dangerous.BUT — for once he has been proved to have been right, because he told the truth when he stoutly denied he had colluded with sinister Russians to ensure he would win the presidential election in 2016.
-
Trump: Operative for the National Democratic Party?
6 minutes readPHILIP A. FARRUGGIO—So, how could the Trumpster work to aid the powerful National Democratic Party? Well, look what has transpired. Trump and his minions, and of course the Real Deep State Fat Cats who run the Military Industrial Empire, they have done so much to destroy we working stiffs. All across the board this Trump crew is a disaster in every way. Not enough, sadly, to wake up those fools within his ‘ base’, many with not a pot to piss in. The polls reveal my claim that Trump is sending millions of people, including many among that 50% of eligible voters who don’t even vote, to the open arms of the Dems.
-
When Charlie Rose, Hillary’s media bulldog, attacked Sanders—disgraceful on all counts.
3 minutes readP. GREANVILLE—The above is a perfect example of several things at once: • CBS (and most major TV networks) obvious allegiance to Hillary Clinton and her bid for the presidency in 2016; The shameless effort by notable “journalists” like Charlie Rose, to shill for her and disparage competitors and critics. In this “interview” Rose is clearly seen dragooning Bernie Sanders into an admission that Hillary’s credentials are excellent for the presidential mantle, which in a twisted way, seen from the viewpoint of the ruling criminal mafia, she is eminently qualified for, but NOT the way he’s trying to sell it to the clueless audience; Sanders’ abject retreat and lack of gonads in simply pushing back against Rose’s inquisitorial browbeating. He should have reminded Rose that putting words in the mouth of the witness is not good judicial practice and certainly not journalistic practice. Of course, such remonstrating might have been edited out or cancelled the whole interview, but at least he would have shown Rose that there are limits to his whorish impudence.