Trump Co-opted to Stay Hardline on Russia

black-horizontalDispatches from
STEPHEN LENDMAN

stevenlendmanbanner
A fter a few weeks in office, Trump abandoned notions of improved ties with Russia. Putting Russophobes in charge of defense, national and homeland security dashed hopes for better relations. The reported upcoming appointment of Russophobe Fiona Hill as White House Director for Europe and Russia provides more evidence. 

 American geopolitical policy seems like Obama never left. Endless imperial wars rage. The risk of US confrontation with Russia and China remains – by design or accident, nuclear war not off the table as hoped for with Hillary’s defeat. A ray of good news came from Trump’s mid-February press conference, debunking media reports on Russia as “fabricated fake news. It is all fake news,” he said, adding:
 .

“The greatest thing I could do is shoot that (Russian) ship that’s 30 miles offshore right out of the water. Everyone will say, “(o)h, it’s so great. It’s so great. That’s not great.” Then more, saying a “(n)uclear holocaust would be like no other. They are a very powerful nuclear country and so are we. But if we have a good relationship with Russia, believe me, that is a good thing, not a bad thing.” Days later, he reportedly told advisers and allies he’d likely shelve plans to cooperate with Moscow in combating terrorism and other national security issues at least temporarily. It shows in continuing Obama’s wars, escalating conflict in Syria, perhaps intending troop buildups in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq, along with sending special forces to Yemen, Libya, Somalia, and perhaps elsewhere in the Middle East and North Africa – on the phony pretext of combating terrorism America supports.


On March 3, ABC News said the Pentagon “quietly ordered new commando deployments to the Middle East and North Africa…with the encouragement of President Trump.” Aboard the Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier last week, he said “(w)e’re are going to have very soon the finest equipment in the world. We will give our military the tools you need to prevent war, and if required to fight war and only do one thing and do you know what that is, win, win, we’re going to start winning again.”

 .
His bluster sounded like a call to arms for increased aggression in multiple theaters, perhaps in new ones. Last month at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Defense Secretary Mattis said Washington isn’t ready to collaborate with Moscow militarily. Secretary of State Tillerson said Russia must first stop violence in Ukraine – it has nothing to do with, Tillerson ignoring Moscow’s all-out efforts for diplomatic resolution to nearly three years of Kiev aggression against its own people.
 .
Wrongfully blaming Russia for nonexistent US election hacking persists. On Monday, Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer called for an immediate Justice Department investigation into (nonexistent) political interference with ongoing inquiries into (nonexistent) Russian US election hacking, blustering: “The American people deserve to know if the investigation into Russia’s interference with our election and the administration’s contact with Russian officials has been compromised by political interference.”
 .
He asked DOJ inspector Michael Horowitz to determine if any “misconduct” occurred, along with investigating whether any department staff members “violat(ed) criminal and civil laws.” Schumer wants witch-hunt inquiries continued – to undermine Trump, bashing Russia relentlessly at the same time, preventing any chance for better relations. According to Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, “hysteria” rages in Washington. “This is something unbelievable, and I don’t actually think it corresponds with our national interests. I mean both interests of the US and Russia. (It’s) doing a lot of harm to the future of bilateral relations.”
 .
Weeks earlier, he was hopeful for eventual improved ties, saying time is being lost resolving problems of concern to both nations. After a century of US hostility toward Russia, chances for more normalized bilateral relations seem as distant as ever. The risk of war between the world’s dominant nuclear powers remains ominously real.

NOTE: ALL IMAGE CAPTIONS, PULL QUOTES AND COMMENTARY BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS • CONTINUE THE DEBATE ON OUR FACEBOOK PAGE. CLICK HERE. 


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Screen Shot 2016-02-19 at 10.13.00 AM

STEPHEN LENDMAN lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."  ( http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html ) Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com



black-horizontal

black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN. SIGN UP AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.=
free • safe • invaluable

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary.  In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.  




Delusional Liberals : Seeing the World Through a Trumpian Keyhole


horiz grey line

tgplogo12313

Patrice Greanville


Ever since Donald Trump became the 45th occupant of the White House, sanctimonious liberals and their numerous media—including overt Democratic party shills like the Daily Kos—have been having a field day with the Twitterer in Chief.


Mark Sumner does in this excerpt from the Daily Kos, about “Obama’s accomplishments” is grotesquely delusional or intentionally deceiful. Or just plain dumb. A rather normal finding when thinking about mainstream liberals these days. Incidentally, many liberals prone to lucubration  think they can impersonate truth via pseudo-sophisticated analysis, or witty, scathing and snide commentary—a field they specialize in.  The sad part is that kind of devious stratagem frequently works, deepening the confusion that now envelops the public mind like an unbeatable fog.

—PG

The piece critiqued in the above comment, appearing on the Daily Kos, can be found below:

I will not be made a fool of! Do you hear me?

When Trump ran into Christopher Ruddy on the golf course and later at dinner Saturday, he vented to his friend. “This will be investigated,” Ruddy recalled Trump telling him. “It will all come out. I will be proven right.”

“He was pissed,” said Ruddy, the chief executive of Newsmax, a conservative media company. “I haven’t seen him this angry.”

Not only is Trump obsessed over a conspiracy of persecution that includes non-existent phone taps, a cadre of “low life leakers,” and a press eager to display his every failure, he’s also being driven (more) snot-slinging crazy by the thought that he could be compared to President Obama.

Gnawing at Trump, according to one of his advisers, is the comparison between his early track record and that of Obama in 2009, when amid the Great Recession he enacted an economic stimulus bill and other big-ticket items.

Yes, by this point Obama had proposed, negotiated, renegotiated, and signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. That’s on top of getting the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act signed within the first two weeks of his administration.

What has Trump accomplished? Well … he wrote a bunch of executive orders, one of which has already been blocked in court, and he signed a bill making it easier for energy companies to pollute both the air and water. Hows that hatey-wally thing going for Trump voters?

Trump’s young presidency has existed in a perpetual state of chaos.

Trump made a huge number of promises about what he would accomplish day one, but real governing has turned out to be harder than just screaming at a receptive crowd.


REMEDIAL READING


For those who wish to read something far closer to the truth than mere elegies or apologetics for Obama, this piece by Obama expert Paul Street is just what you need. Many more essays of this type are awaiting inspection in our archives. 

WE TOLD YOU SO DEPT.: “Progressive” Obama: He’s Melting, He’s Melting


NOTE: ALL IMAGE CAPTIONS, PULL QUOTES AND COMMENTARY BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS • PLEASE COMMENT AND DEBATE DIRECTLY ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP CLICK HERE

 P. Greanville is this site's editor in chief.  


Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long grey

uza2-zombienationWhat will it take to bring America to live according to its own propaganda?


black-horizontal

black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
Please see our red registration box at the bottom of this page

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary. In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.

horiz-black-wide
REMEMBER: ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




black-horizontal

THE GREANVILLE POST

For media inquiries contact us at greanville@gmail.com




No Surrender? A Critique of Guy McPherson’s Prediction of Near-Term Human Extinction

FRONTLINENEWSLOGO-2


BY MOTI NISSANI


This posting reproduces a recent article by Prof. Guy McPherson, an article that deserves far more attention than it is likely to receive in either the mainstream, scholarly, or so-called alternative media.  That article, in turn, is followed by a brief appraisal.

No Surrender

Posted by Guy McPherson on March 1, 2017

SAN ANTONIO Belize—(Weekly Hubris)—March 2017—I’m routinely accused of giving up. Worse, it is often written that the message of near-term human extinction encourages people to give up. As the primary messenger of this devastating message, I’m often at the receiving end of messages fueled by ignorance and its frequent companion, hatred.

For what it’s worth—and I suspect my two cents is overpriced this time—this essay serves as a correction to my detractors. I’m neither giving up on the living planet nor encouraging others to do the same.

Giving up is not giving in: accepting our fate is not synonymous with jumping into the absurdly omnicidal mainstream. Just because we’re opossums on the roadway doesn’t mean we should play possum. Resistance is fertile, after all. To employ a bit of The Boss: “In the end, what you don’t surrender, well, the world just strips away.”

Or, to employ a bit of Zen: Let go, or be dragged.

Or, to employ a bit of popular culture: Carpe diem.

Or, to employ a bit of Nietzsche: “Live as though the day were here.”

Climate chaos is well under way, and has become irreversible over temporal spans relevant to humans because of self-reinforcing feedback loops (so-called positive feedbacks). Such is the nature of reaching the acceleration phase of the non-linear system that is climate catastrophe.

As a result of ongoing, accelerating climate change, I’m letting go of the notion that Homo sapiens will inhabit this planet beyond 2026. I’m letting go of the notion that, within a few short years, there will remain any habitat for humans in the interior of any large continent. I’m letting go of the notion we’ll retain even a fraction of one percent of the species currently on Earth beyond 2030. But I’m not letting go of the notion of resistance, which is a moral imperative.

I will no longer judge people for buying into cultural conditioning. It’s far easier to live in a city, at the height of civilization’s excesses, than not. I know how easy it is to live in a city surrounded by beautiful distractions and pleasant interactions, and I fully understand the costs and consequences of dwelling there, as well as the price to be paid in the near future. I spent about half my life in various cities, and I understand the physical ease and existential pain of living at the apex of empire.

Also, I know all about the small joys and great pains associated with living in the country. I spent the other half of my life in the country and in towns with fewer than 1,000 people. I understand why the country bumpkin is assigned stereotypical labels related to ignorance and, paradoxically, self-reliance.

It’s clearly too late to tear down this irredeemably corrupt system and realize any substantive benefits for humans or other organisms. And yet I strongly agree with activist Lierre Keith: “The task of an activist is not to navigate systems of oppressive power with as much personal integrity as possible; it is to dismantle those systems.”

If it seems I’m filled with contradictions, color me fully human in a Walt Whitman sort of way: “Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes.”

Our remaining time on this orb is too short to cast aspersions at those who live differently from ourselves, as most people in industrialized countries have done throughout their lives. Most people in the industrialized world became cultural crack babies in the womb. There is little hope of breaking the addiction of ingestion at this late point in the era of industry, and I’m throwing in the towel on changing the minds of willfully ignorant Americans. No longer will I try to convince people to give up the crack pipe based on my perception of reality.

My continued efforts to speak and write will represent personal perspectives and actions. I’ll no longer recommend to others the path I’ve taken.

Nietzsche’s comment about seizing the day, every day, brings to mind the final words of Joseph Campbell’s 1949 book, The Hero with a Thousand Faces: “It is not society that is to guide and save the creative hero, but precisely the reverse. And so every one of us shares the supreme ordeal—carries the cross of the redeemer—not in the bright moments of his tribe’s great victories, but in the silences of his personal despair.”

With the preceding dire news in mind, it would be easy to forget how fortunate we are. After all, we get to die. This simple fact alone is cause for celebration because it indicates that we get to live. As I wrote many years ago, our knowledge of DNA assures us that the odds of any one of us existing are greater than the odds against being a particular grain of sand on all the world’s beaches. No, the odds are much greater than that: they exceed the odds of being a single atom plucked from the entire universe. To quote the evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, “In the teeth of these stupefying odds it is you and I that are privileged to be here, privileged with eyes to see where we are and brains to wonder why.”

It’s quite a deal, and no surrender is necessary. We get to live. Let’s live. Let’s be fully present. Let’s live here now.

No Surrender:  An Appraisal

Posted by Moti Nissani on March 5, 2017

To begin with, Dr. McPherson deserves credit for setting conformity aside and wisely reminding us that, in the ongoing war between humanity and nature, nature bats last.

I likewise agree with him that it is just about impossible to wake up a victim of mind control.  Aldous Huxley:

“The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim. To him the walls of his prison are invisible, and he believes himself to be free.”

Experimental proof is available here:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_perseverance

I also agree that the climate situation is dire and that we are governed by a criminal enterprise.  However, I feel the situation is not as bad as Prof. McPherson seems to believe, and, at the same time, that it is far more multifaceted.

First, not as bad.  Rule number one when dealing with complex systems is unpredictability: You can’t be sure about the future of anything as intricate as the biosphere or climate.  So Prof. McPherson, as an experienced scientist, ought to revise his statement along these lines:  “There is a 90% chance that humanity will go extinct by 2026.”  Averring a 100% probability is, in principle, unscientific.  See the online version of a 1996 peer-reviewed article for more details:   http://drnissani.net/mnissani/pagepub/GREENp&e.htm

Second, our plight is multifaceted.  Climate change is just one of the grave threats to the biosphere.  There are many, many others, including nuclear power, nuclear war, genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and chemical contamination—all part of humanity’s war against nature and against itself.  If you take all these together, and if we do not overhaul soon our political system, I conservatively calculated elsewhere the probability that humanity will go extinct in the next 200 years as something like 94%.  See:  http://dissidentvoice.org/2015/06/the-human-experiment-is-probably-coming-to-an-end/

The take-home lesson is:  Humanity still has a chance—a small one, but nonetheless real.  If I am right, instead of surrendering, we ought to fight back.

In we choose engagement, our first question might be:  What kind of a political system should we strive for?  The proven answer we’ve all been brainwashed against is: real democracy.  See:   https://www.greanvillepost.com/2016/08/12/7-4-billion-cheers-for-real-democracy/ 

The second question is:  How do we overthrow the vicious, suicidal, oligarchy that rules us now?  One unpleasant—but logically compelling—answer involves giving our rulers just a bit of their own lethal medicine.    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/17/the-al-sabbah-brigade/ 

Paradoxically, one of the most moving calls to arms known to me appears in Prof. McPherson’s own website (http://guymcpherson.com/2011/02/the-people-vs-the-united-states/):

“They’ll talk about change, about politics, about reform, about corruption, but they will never talk about war unless they mean something happening far away. Because to admit the existence of the war waged against us is to admit that we are combatants, and if we see that we are not fighting back, then we would have to admit that we have surrendered. That we have already been defeated.”


NOTE: ALL IMAGE CAPTIONS, PULL QUOTES AND COMMENTARY BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS • PLEASE COMMENT AND DEBATE DIRECTLY ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP CLICK HERE 
Dr. Moti Nissani is an eminent thinker on interdisciplinary environmental issues. Using the Fermi paradox as a platform, he breaks down the fate of the human race and offers a simple and eloquent solution to preventing humanity’s extinction.

Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long grey



black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary.  In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.  

horiz-black-wide
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




black-horizontal




Stranger than Fiction



Dispatches from Deena Stryker


[dropcap]I[/dropcap]f memory serves me right, after World War II, the US, the Soviet Union and various bystanders in the looming standoff between the two nuclear powers founded The United Nations, with the hope that unlike the League of Nations, it would keep international peace for all time.

Fast forward seventy plus years and the political community in Washington is threatening to blow up the Trump presidency because of revelations that his advisors were meeting with Russian diplomats before he was sworn in — in the hope of overcoming the most serious falling out ever between the two major nuclear powers! How dare he try to cooperate with the enemy?

Only those who do not wish to see can deny that powerful people in Washington have itching trigger fingers — fatuously believing that a nuclear war would be no big deal. Tonight on CNN Vice President Pence, trying desperately to steer clear of the gathering storm, claimed “Of course there were no contacts with the Russians during the campaign.  Why would there be?!!!!!”  Why would there be?  Really?


 Editor’s Note:  The very idea that any contact, by anyone, with an ambassador with whom Washington maintains formal relations is a crime, or an act meriting suspicion of treason, is not only ludicrous and contrary to longstanding norms, but the height of hypocrisy, especially considering the role of US embassies around the world, veritable engines of espionage, political turmoil, and often counter-revolution in their host countries. But of course, neither truth, nor common sense, or elementary decency, have any bearing on how the US media “reports” reality.  

If the disgrace of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn was the first act in an orchestrated effort to eventually bring down the Trump administration, we are now witnessing act two.  (Sadly, a bright, seemingly aware young anchor who got her stripes following the presidential campaign, wondered tonight whether the career diplomat who is Russia’s ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak is a spy!)

Actually, it turns out the ambassador was keen to make sure that if elected, Trump would not approve arms sales to the Neo-Nazi regime that the Clinton/Obama State Department installed in Ukraine, in an attempt to pry that large country away from Russia and fold it into the European Union, together with the countries on Russia’s Eastern border, who have also opened their doors to NATO tanks and troops.

American journalists repeat like a mantra that Putin hated Hillary Clinton, but never mention the reason: it was her Assistant Secretary for European Affairs Victoria Nuland (wife of fellow Neocon writer Robert Kagan) who, after boasting to a press gathering that the US had spent over $5 billion dollars supporting the Ukraine opposition to Russia-friendly president Yanukovich, handed out cookies to Maidan ‘revolutionaries’, then in a phone call with the US Ambassador, discussed which Ukrainian oligarch, wrestler or banker should be anointed as president, and which should be prime minister (famously adding ‘fuck the EU!’ if it didn’t agree).

Recusing himself from investigating Trump surrogates’ encounters with Russian diplomats, after lying to Congress about his own participation in them, pixie-faced Attorney General Jeff Sessions played the down-home southerner to the hilt. One participant on Chris Matthews’ Hardball asked coyly ‘If there was nothing wrong’ about Trump surrogates meeting with the Russian ambassador…? implying they might have been discussing the best way for Russia to influence the vote, rather than how to end a US-inspired war on Russia’s doorstep.

This morning the witch hunt continues. Former Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul made the trip to Washington from his sinecure at a California university, but when asked on MSNBC who the Russian Ambassador really is, he showed the miserable level of American intellectuals. He said Sergey Kislyak liked to give parties, but that he revealed the poor state of the Russian economy by serving Costco vodka to his guests.  I’ll wager the decision was taken on the basis of most Americans probably not knowing the difference…


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

DEENA STRYKER, Senior Contributing Editor

Born in Philadelphia, Stryker spent most of her adolescent and adult years in Europe, resulting over time in several unique books, her latest being 

CUBA: Diary of a Revolution, Inside the Cuban Revolution with Fidel, Raul, Che, and Celia Sanchez

ALSO: Lunch with Fellini, Dinner with Fidel: An Illustrated Personal Journey from the Cold War to the Arab Spring

America Revealed to a Honey-Colored World

A Taoist Politics: The Case For Sacredness

She began her journalistic career at the French News Agency in Rome, spent two years in Cuba finding out whether the Barbados were Communists before they made the revolution (‘Cuba 1964: When the Revolution was Young’). After spending half a decade in Eastern Europe, and a decade in the U.S., studying Global Survival and writing speeches in the Carter State Department, she wrote the only book that foresaw the fall of the Berlin Wall AND the dissolution of the Soviet Union (“Une autre Europe, un autre Monde’). Her memoir, ‘Lunch with Fellini, Dinner with Fidel’, tells it all. ‘A Taoist Politics: The Case for Sacredness’, which examines the similarities between ancient wisdom and modern science and what this implies for political activism; and ‘America Revealed to a Honey-Colored World” is a pamphlet about how the U.S. came down from the City on a Hill’. 



NOTE: ALL IMAGE CAPTIONS, PULL QUOTES AND COMMENTARY BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS • PLEASE COMMENT AND DEBATE DIRECTLY ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP CLICK HERE 

MAIN IMAGE: Ambassador Sergey Kislyak shakes Pres. Putin’s hand at airport.


Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long grey

uza2-zombienationWhat will it take to bring America to live according to its own propaganda?


black-horizontal

black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
Please see our red registration box at the bottom of this page

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary. In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.

horiz-black-wide
REMEMBER: ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




black-horizontal

THE GREANVILLE POST

For media inquiries contact us at greanville@gmail.com




The Obamas sign reported $65 million book deal


horiz grey line

tgplogo12313

By David Walsh
Senior Film, Arts & Culture Critic, wsws.org


 THE EDITOR SAYS: Anyone who believes these narcissistic, ghost-written books are worth this kind of obscene money is a certifiable idiot. But producing idiots is what US culture excels at.


Executives at Penguin Random House, the global publishing giant, announced Tuesday that the firm had reached an agreement to publish books by former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama. Vanity Faircommented, “The couple will write their books separately but sold the book rights jointly.”

The Financial Times reported that Penguin Random House had won a record-breaking auction between publishing houses and will buy the two books for more than $65 million. It is not known which one of the company’s numerous imprints will publish them. The previous record for a presidential memoir belonged to Bill Clinton—$15 million.

Markus Dohle: Penguin’s CEO in charge of starting the payola spigot. Capitalist henchmen like these embody the complete lack of ethics and decency of the system they worship.

In a press release, Penguin Random House CEO Markus Dohle (the publisher is owned 53 percent by German media conglomerate Bertelsmann) explained: “We are absolutely thrilled to continue our publishing partnership with President and Mrs. Obama. With their words and their leadership, they changed the world, and every day, with the books we publish at Penguin Random House, we strive to do the same. Now, we are very much looking forward to working together with President and Mrs. Obama to make each of their books global publishing events of unprecedented scope and significance.”

A month ago we commented on a study that concluded “the Obamas could earn as much as $242.5 million from speeches, book deals and pensions.” That study estimated a book deal for the couple would be worth $40 million. The Obamas have topped that by $25 million, or 62.5 percent. This pushes their estimated post-White House earnings toward the $300 million mark.

As we noted in early February, Obama is being paid for the services he rendered the financial oligarchy during his two terms in the White House. Sixty-five million dollars—or even $267.5 million—is a small price to pay for the contribution the former president made to enriching the already fabulously rich, defending the American ruling elite’s geopolitical interests around the world and continuing the assault on the wages, benefits and living standards of the working class.

The man who promised “change” and whose election was termed a “transformative event” by the American pseudo-left proved to be an implacable defender of big business.

The WSWS has reported several times that during Obama’s administration the wealth of the richest 400 Americans grew from $1.57 trillion to $2.4 trillion and the stock market enjoyed one of its most successful runs in history.

Now Obama plans to vacation with billionaires, play golf and “cash in.”

The announcement of the $65 million deal has not been accompanied in the media by any criticism, much less shame or revulsion, nor are the Obamas presumably embarrassed in the slightest. On the contrary, the media and Obama’s admirers treat the book deal for the most part as a tremendous accomplishment, something to be immensely proud of, just as the news anchors now gloatingly report record share prices or billion-dollar box office successes.


If Barack Obama were to write an honest book, it would be worth something. If he were to reveal the forces that picked him up at a relatively early age, seeing in him a marketable political commodity (both white and black, liberal and conservative, foreign and American), and how those forces assembled and packaged him and carried him into the White House, well, that would be valuable.


Political life in the US has reached a stage at which the representatives of the immensely wealthy are immensely wealthy themselves, or the immensely wealthy rule directly, as in the case of Donald Trump. Official American politics is a closed-in, sealed-off universe of money and privilege.

The Chicago Tribune pointed out some years ago that, after completing his term in office, “Thomas Jefferson was forced to sell his 6,000-volume book collection to the government—forming the core of the Library of Congress—to pay off his creditors; his debt-ridden successor, James Madison, pleaded in vain for a loan from the new Bank of the United States; and the next president, James Monroe, was so impoverished upon his death in New York that his family could not afford to send his remains back to his native Virginia.”

None of those ex-presidents requested a pension. “In these early years, with the revolution against King George still a fresh memory, a lifetime government sinecure smacked too much of royal privilege.”

Now we have this, according to the New York Times: “Speculation about the Obamas’ books and how much they would sell for have been circulating in the industry in recent weeks, as executives at the top publishing houses met separately with the former president and first lady. Some publishing executives who followed the bidding process said that the opening offers for Mr. Obama’s book alone were in the $18 million to $20 million range.”

If Barack Obama were to write an honest book, it would be worth something. If he were to reveal the forces that picked him up at a relatively early age, seeing in him a marketable political commodity (both white and black, liberal and conservative, foreign and American), and how those forces assembled and packaged him and carried him into the White House, well, that would be valuable.

Of course, that will never happen. The new book will no doubt be even more repugnant than the last one, The Audacity of Hope (2006). As we observed in our review of that work on the WSWS in February 2007, “Is there a single honest or original thought in Barack Obama’s new book? If so, it does not immediately come to mind.”

We wrote that Obama’s work was “a calculated effort, from its title to its final page, designed to demonstrate his readiness to take the reins of political power in the US. That is to say, while Obama directs portions of his book toward sections of the more well-heeled and complacent Democratic Party faithful, those most inclined to wishful thinking, the audience that primarily concerns him consists of the powerful corporate, financial and media figures who organize and ultimately shape the campaigns of the two major parties’ candidates.”

But Obama’s new memoir will have so much more to cover up or ignore: the multi-billion dollar Wall Street bail-out, the halving of auto workers’ pay, the illegal drone strike murders of thousands, the unprecedented growth of social inequality, the reactionary health care initiative, the disastrous wars or interventions in Libya, Syria, Yemen … And one could add, the election of Trump itself, the fitting climax to two terms during which Obama disappointed, disillusioned and angered tens of millions, opening the door to the most sinister administration in American history.

The Times editors, of course, have only one thing on their collective mind, or rather two, race and money: “A frank discussion of his [Obama’s] time in the White House, and of issues like race relations in America, could reach an even wider audience, becoming a worldwide blockbuster. Penguin Random House, a global publishing house with more than 250 imprints, has worldwide rights to the books, which means the company can make a good deal of money overseas and in translation.”

Meanwhile, contrary to the Obamas and their apologists, Penguin Random House and the corrupt media, great numbers of people will be disgusted by the $65 million payoff and the profound discrediting of the entire American political system, with its ultimately revolutionary implications, will continue apace.

NOTE: ALL IMAGE CAPTIONS, PULL QUOTES AND COMMENTARY BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS • PLEASE COMMENT AND DEBATE DIRECTLY ON OUR FACEBOOK GROUP CLICK HERE


Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long grey

uza2-zombienationWhat will it take to bring America to live according to its own propaganda?


black-horizontal

black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable
Please see our red registration box at the bottom of this page

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary. In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.

horiz-black-wide
REMEMBER: ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




black-horizontal

THE GREANVILLE POST

For media inquiries contact us at greanville@gmail.com