Trump Compromised by Russia?

BE SURE TO PASS OUR ARTICLES ON TO KIN, FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES

 

NYTimes bloviator Friedman: Pseudo journalism elevated to a noxious art. “President Trump is either totally compromised by the Russians or is a towering fool, or both, but either way he has shown himself unwilling or unable to defend America against a Russian campaign to divide and undermine our democracy,”

Baseless accusations persist, scoundrel media-led propaganda war on Trump for the wrong reasons. NYT columnist Thomas Friedman produces pseudo-journalism, the real thing absent in his commentaries. They’re shallow, deceptive, arrogant, disinformation rubbish – material no responsible editors would publish. The Times features it. “Our democracy is in serious danger,” he roared in his latest column. How possible when no democracy exists!

Friedman: “President Trump is either totally compromised by the Russians or is a towering fool, or both, but either way he has shown himself unwilling or unable to defend America against a Russian campaign to divide and undermine our democracy,” adding:

“(E)ither Trump’s real estate empire has taken large amounts of money from shady oligarchs linked to the Kremlin – so much that they literally own him; or rumors are true that he engaged in sexual misbehavior while he was in Moscow running the Miss Universe contest, which Russian intelligence has on tape and he doesn’t want released; or Trump actually believes Russian President Vladimir Putin when he says he is innocent of intervening in our elections – over the explicit findings of Trump’s own CIA, NSA and FBI chiefs.”

“Trump is either hiding something so threatening to himself, or he’s criminally incompetent to be commander in chief…Russia is not our friend. It has acted in a hostile manner. And Trump keeps ignoring it all.”

All of the above is disgraceful rubbish, not a shred of evidence suggesting any of it.

Trump’s sex life is his own business, no one else’s. It’s unrelated to affairs of state.

Until elected president, women didn’t publicly accuse him of sexual misconduct. Why not earlier as a private citizen?

Numerous US leaders and other politicians had extra-marital affairs. The issue is between them and their spouses, no one else.

Nothing suggests Russia has compromising information about Trump in Moscow or anywhere else.

America’s intelligence community chiefs lied, claiming Russian interference in America’s electoral process, failing to provide evidence proving it because none exists – no evidence, no wrongdoing, no probable cause to suggest it.

False accusations and allegations reflect malicious slander – what responsible media would denounce.

Not the Times and other media scoundrels, jumping on any chance to denigrate Trump for defeating their favorite Hillary, along with continuing a disgraceful Russophobic campaign.

Nothing supports Friedman suggesting Trump’s hiding something threatening.

Accusing him of being criminally incompetent to be commander in chief ignores war crimes committed by most US presidents, notably the Clintons, Bush/Cheney, Obama and Trump.

The Times, Friedman, and other media scoundrels suppress this information, what’s most important to report.

The Russian Federation never “acted in a hostile manner” against America or any other country. Washington and its rogue allies do it repeatedly – ignored by media scoundrels, falsely blaming Moscow for their crimes. Friedman is an embarrassment to journalism the way it’s supposed to be – his columns filled with disgraceful rubbish.  They’re painful reading for anyone wasting time on them, including media critics, commenting on his trash to expose it.

“The biggest threat to the integrity of our democracy today is in the Oval Office,” he roared, adding “(t)his is code red.”

No intelligent news, information and analysis consumers would waste time on his columns – except to denounce them as malicious disinformation.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
 Screen Shot 2016-02-19 at 10.13.00 AMSTEPHEN LENDMAN was born in 1934 in Boston, MA. In 1956, he received a BA from Harvard University. Two years of US Army service followed, then an MBA from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in 1960. After working seven years as a marketing research analyst, he joined the Lendman Group family business in 1967. He remained there until retiring at year end 1999. Writing on major world and national issues began in summer 2005. In early 2007, radio hosting followed. Lendman now hosts the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network three times weekly. Distinguished guests are featured. Listen live or archived. Major world and national issues are discussed. Lendman is a 2008 Project Censored winner and 2011 Mexican Journalists Club international journalism award recipient. His new site is at http://stephenlendman.org


black-horizontal
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]




Lovefest in Korea Leaves US Regime Fuming

Dateline Feb 11, 2018
espite all efforts of the paranoid and unpredictable US regime, the Koreans are making love not war during the 2018 Winter Olympics.  The US regime is furious and pulling out all the hate stops to tarnish North Korea, and try and put South Korea back on the US colonial leash.  While not exactly an anti-colonial attack dog, South Korea’s democratically elected peace-president Moon Jae-in is showing signs that he is not an America poodle either.


A departure from the colonialist script: South Korean President Moon Jae-in speaks during the opening ceremony of the 132nd IOC session ahead of the 2018 Winter Olympics in Gangneung, South Korea, Monday, February 5, 2018.


Every four years the US regime uses the Olympics as an opportunity to rain chaos and hate during the Olympics’ historical tradition of bringing the world’s best athletes together in celebration of world unity, human dignity, fraternity among all nations and the possibilities when nations come together in peace.

Happiness, unity and peace are a threat to the paranoid US regime, which is dedicated to war, death, and chaos.  Like a drone hurling bombs at wedding parties and funerals, the unpredictable US regime tries to sabotage anything good and decent that might come from a peaceful gathering of nations.  Such a large gathering during the Olympics of world leaders, athletes and people of the world sets off the military-industrial-complex’s algorithm of a meeting of high profile targets in need of a signature strike.   

As Obama said, “I have two words for you, Predator Drone; you won’t even see it coming”.  It worked for Obama during the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi.  From the time of the announcement in July of 2007, for almost eight years until 2014, Russia was preparing for the celebration of its emergence like a phoenix from the ashes of chaos sown by US infiltrators of neoliberalism, looting of state enterprises, and imposing austerity on Russian citizens during the decade of the 1990’s. 



The US economic advisors to Russia’s drunken and abjectly corrupt president Boris Yeltsin led Russia down a yellow brick road they said would lead to a golden transformation from communism to a Western style capitalism, with consumerist abundance for all.  When the neoliberal transformation turned into a train wreck the US Nobel Prize winning economists said it was just a temporary hard landing.  The savage free marketism orgy went on for over a decade, during which most Russians saw their economic and social security vanish, their lifespan index plummet, criminality fester in every nook and cranny of society, and their national sovereignty reduced to that of a humiliated vassal state at the mercy of the Washington plutocracy. By the turn of the millennium, the Russian people had had enough of US-style voodoo economics and elected Vladimir Putin as their leader. Putin told the US thank you very much and showed the esteemed economic shamans the exit door and kicked them out.  The US would never forgive Putin and they would do everything they could to shun, vilify and regime-change him. 


Good for South Korea.  They deserve the liberation and independence the US promised them in 1945.  South Korea had been under the boot of Japanese subjugation from 1905 to 1945.  Since 1945 the South has been under the subjugation of the US boot.  North Korea has been independent since the Russians left in 1948.  They are nobody’s puppet and they want to go their own way.

During the years while Vladimir Putin was engineering a recovery of Russia’s economy, the US’s Obama regime was spending $5 billion plotting a coup d’etat in Ukraine.  The coup was timed for when Russia would be overjoyed celebrating the Sochi Olympics.  To prepare the US public for a resumption of a US-led Cold War the international cartel of Western propaganda organs, led by the New York Times and the Guardian, began laying the groundwork of anti-Russian propaganda.  The propandists led a vilification project portraying Vladimir Putin as a thuggish, homophobic killer of journalists, a ruthless operator who invaded Georgia, and is an evil dictator.  While the Russians and the rest of the world celebrated the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics, US backed fascists instigated a violent overthrow of Russia’s neighbor and historical cousin country Ukraine (in fact Ukraine is the cradle of Russian civilization), the original rus, and its democratically elected government.

The US in its ruthless pettiness always looks for an opportunity to rain on the parade of some other country that it wants to punish for not being one of its lackeys, or for not showing sufficient deference to the global hegemon. For the 2018 Winter Olympics the US planned to ramp up tensions and impose more economy killer-sanctions on North Korea in order to put an even brighter contrasting glow to the US dominated Western-style capitalist South Korean so-called miracle economy. 

In 2017 the US regime got a sneaking suspicion that things were not going as planned.  The feisty South Korean people said they had had enough of the US backed corrupt puppet president Park Geun-hye, granddaughter of the despotic US-backed dictator Park Chung-hee (1963 to 1979).  In late 2016 the South Korean people began mass protests holding candlelight vigils demanding the resignation of Park Geun-hye.


Trump and Pence—two moral and intellectual imbeciles, two turds catapulted to the summit of US power— vividly personify the bankruptcy of US politics and the emptiness of its claims to be a real democracy.

Candlelight vigils have become a tradition of South Korean protesters since the 2002 killing of a South Korean girl by US occupation soldiers.  When the soldiers were being court martialed by the US military, the South Korean people held candlelight vigils demanding justice.  They didn’t get it.  The soldiers were found not guilty (surprise!), but the non-violent candlelight vigils continued as a traditional form of protest whenever the South Koreans demonstrated against injustice, US arrogance, and political corruption. 

The candlelight vigils against Park Geun-hye continued and grew in 2017 until the South Korean parliament caved in to the demonstrators and impeached Park for corruption and influence peddling.  Park Geun-hye is now in prison, where her grandfather should have once been too, if an assassin’s bullet had not found him first in 1979.  Her grandfather had also been a collaborator during Korea’s humiliation of Japanese colonialism.  Collaboration and corruption do run in the family, but these dynastic vices are virtues in the eyes of the Americans who instinctively seek out the most corrupt to use as their local shills.

In May 2017 elections that followed Park’s ouster the South Korean people, especially the younger generation, said they had had enough of US instigated animosity between them and their Northern brothers and sisters.  Moon Jae-in ran an elections campaign on a platform of anti-cronyism with South Korea’s giant industrial monopolies, increased social programs for the people and a Sunshine Policy 2.0 similar to that of President Kim Dae-jung (1998 to 2008).  Moon won a landslide victory on his platform of peace and social justice for the people.

The US regime has been sulking, plotting and hyperventilating with sarcasm, saber rattling and retaliation against both South Korea and North Korea for resuming a warming of relations that started in the early 21st century under Kim Dae-jung, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for his Sunshine Policy in 2000.    Before Moon could even take office in May, the US regime humiliated him and caused him to lose face by putting THAAD missiles in South Korea.  Thousands of South Koreans protested against the THAAD’s, but since the US has military operational (colonial) control in South Korea the peoples’ protests were disregarded.  Instead the US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson rained on the Sunshine before it even dawned.  In April 2017 Reuters reported:

“[Tillerson] expected to discuss tougher sanctions [with Congress], which US officials say could include oil embargo, banning North Korean airlines, intercepting cargo ships, and punishing Chinese and other banks for doing business with Pyongyang…all options are on the table.”

For months the US regime has been raising the volume of the rhetoric against North Korea, threatening war, installing THAAD missiles, shipping more nukes to Guam, threatening a first strike nuclear attack, conspiring with military allies, and tightening the screws of killer economic sanctions.  All options are on the table except the diplomatic option.  The US refuses to sit at the same table with Koreans. 

The proponents of economic sanctions claim that they are a non-violent means of coercion.  That is not true.  Economic sanctions are war by other means.  Any coercion of one country against another is aggression, especially if that country is acting within it legal rights as a sovereign nation.  North Korea has broken no international law and it has as much right as South Korea, Japan and the US to have nuclear power for electricity, to test missiles and to even have a nuclear arms program for self-defense and to possess nuclear bombs. 

North Korea has not committed aggression against any other country or threatened to attack anyone except in self-defense.  The US, its allies and the UN have overstepped their bounds in punishing North Korea for what they have every legal right to do.  If the US is so concerned about nuclear proliferation, then they should start living up to their own obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and go talk to their friends Pakistan, India, and Israel too.    

In the 21st century economic sanctions, embargos, blockades, call them whatever; they are weapons of mass destruction that kill civilians and non-combatants indiscriminately.  Economic sanctions kill by restricting the imports of food, medicine, fuel and other essentials.   Economic sanctions deny the victim the ability to export its products in exchange for hard currency, puts a freeze on their foreign assets, and makes international transactions nearly impossible. 

Killer economic sanctions strangle the ability of a country to sustain the civilian infrastructure necessary for the health and life of their citizens.  Even when economic sanctions are so-called “smart sanctions” that target limited sections of a victim’s economy and individuals, all economic sanctions have the effect of intimidating other countries from all economic activity for fear of inadvertently violating the sanctions or just angering a muscular US foreign policy attitude that has hundreds of ways of retaliating against those that have displeased it.  Economic killer-sanctions are a weapon that a strong country can use against a weak country to try to force a change in its behavior, as if a domineering parent were disciplining a naughty child.  That is not how grown up diplomacy is supposed to work.

North Korea has proven that the US propaganda is a lie that North Koreans refuse to sit at the diplomatic table.  The North Koreans have offered time and again to negotiate with the US, it has offered to suspend its nuclear program in return for acts of goodwill by the US in return, and North Korea has even offered multiple times to negotiate a final peace treaty to the Korean War, which ended in 1953 with an armistice, but not a final peace. 

North Korea and South Korea are meeting, talking and marching under a unified flag at the Olympics.  The US is throwing a tantrum and accusing Kim Jong-un’s extended olive branch as a dirty trick to divide South Korea from its master, the US.  The US regime is berating its South Korean underlings as being weak, off the colonial leash, and going it alone without its US paternalistic protection. 

Good for South Korea.  They deserve the liberation and independence the US promised them in 1945.  South Korea had been under the boot of Japanese subjugation from 1905 to 1945.  Since 1945 the South has been under the subjugation of the US boot.  North Korea has been independent since the Russians left in 1948.  They are nobody’s puppet and they want to go their own way.  They want to be Koreans and not Western clones.  That is their right.  They deserve respect.  We can start by using their correct name which is The Democratic Peoples’ Republic of Korea (DPRK).     


[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]


About the author

David William Pear, currently serving as a senior contributing editor, is a progressive columnist writing on economic, political and social issues. He is also a regular columnist and commenter on OpedNews. His articles have been published by The Real News Network, Truth Out, Consortium News, Russia Insider, Pravda and many other progressive publications.  David is a member of Veterans for Peace, St Pete for Peace, CodePink and International Solidarity Movement. In February of 2015 he was part of a people-to-people delegation to Cuba with CodePink. In November of 2015 he was a delegate with CodePink to Palestine to show solidarity with Palestinians. In 2016 David spent 10 weeks in Palestine with the Palestinian non-violent resistance group International Solidarity Movement (ISM). David frequently makes extended trips to Russia as a private citizen. After retiring from finance in 2009, David earned a certification as an Emergency Medical Technician. David is a Vietnam veteran having served as a member of the 5th Special Forces Group as a combat advisor to the Army of the Republic of (South) Viet Nam. David resides with his wife and three cats in Clearwater Beach, Florida.

CARE TO KNOW MORE ABOUT DAVID?

Click on this bar
David has a Bachelor of Science degree in economics from the University of Maryland and attended classes at George Washington University to receive his Certified Financial Planner certification. He also attended courses at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania for his certification as a Certified Investment Management Analyst (CIMA). He has volunteered for public health service, humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, emergency medicine and needs of the homeless. His hobbies include boating, fishing and motorcycle touring. He is also a licensed skydiver (USPA-inactive).

www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100005615508769&view

horiz-long grey

uza2-zombienationWhat will it take to bring America to live according to its own self image?


black-horizontal

 




What ‘News’Media in U.S. and Allied Countries Never Report


BE SURE TO PASS OUR ARTICLES ON TO KIN, FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES
 

Newsmedia effectively ban reporting corruptness of newsmedia — even of media that stand on the opposite side of the political divide.

The ‘news’media in the U.S. and allied countries never report the corruption (including lying) perpetrated by any except the very few non-mainstream media that are authentically pro-democracy (or “anti-Establishment” or “anti-elitist” — which doesn’t necessarily mean the same thing as “anti-elite”) in those countries — and these few pro-democracy sites are the least-corrupt newsmedia, the few ones that are careful to report only truths — no lies, no propaganda at all. They do it even if all the others call such news sites ‘fake news’ — because they are committed, above all, to conveying the truth, and nothing but the truth.

Each of the mainstream ‘news’media is funded by (and advertises) the corporations of billionaires and centi-millionaires (the people who control all of the large corporations and virtually all of the media). These people’s corporations advertise in, and donate to those media, and those mega-business-owners don’t want the public to know that all of the mainstream (and many even of the non-mainstream) ‘news’media are actually propaganda-agencies for what those super-rich [folks] want to happen (their governmental agendas). They not only advertise so that you will buy their products and services, but also report — and exclude from reporting — so that you will vote for their politicians who will impose their governmental agenda in this ‘democracy’, and will vote against their opponents. This is the governmental control-system (which is proven and explained — and shown to function in the U.S.A., by that link to ‘democracy’).

A good example of this phenomenon is the way that the Nunes Memo (about ‘Russiagate’ & Trump), which was released on Friday February 3rd, has been covered in all of the ’news’media.

On the Democratic Party side, which is funded by billionaires who control the Democratic Party and who own Democratic Party ‘news’media, there have been efforts to discredit, or else to minimize the significance of, what the Memo said.

On the Republican Party side, which is funded by billionaires who control the Republican Party and who own Republican Party ‘news’media, there have been efforts to credit, and also to maximize the significance of, what the Memo said.

It’s a Republican memo, so that’s understandable on strictly partisan grounds. If either of those Parties represented the public instead of the billionaires who fund them, then there would be a possibility of overcoming the ugly reality that’s documented in that link about our ‘democracy’ — and actually having a democratic government instead of our existing dictatorship — but unfortunately, neither Party does represent the public (which is why what was reported in that link to ‘democracy’ happened to be the case).

However, when I emailed on February 2nd, to all major and many minor ’news’media in the U.S. and its allied countries, submitting to them a news-report exposing the corruptness of one particular major U.S. ’news’medium’s news-story on the significance of what the Memo said, no mainstream U.S.-and-allied ’news’medium published it, and only two non-mainstream ones did: washingtonsblog, and RINF.

Although I hadn’t seen this tweet from the head of Judicial Watch, I had just explained the basic reasoning that stood behind it — so, here’s the significance of the Nunes Memo, in a nutshell (and my article, which was published only by washingtonsblog and RINF, provides the actual case):

https://twitter.com/TomFitton/status/959481196446183426?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.infowars.com%2Fdeep-state-death-spiral-dems-in-denial-over-damning-fisa-memo%2F

Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch

Memo:  No FISA warrant without [Steele] Dossier.  Which means no Russia collusion story without Dossier.  Which means no Mueller special counsel without Dossier paid for by Clinton/DNC.  Shut it down.

9:38 AM – 2 Feb 2018

This happens to be in line with the Republican PR campaign on the matter, but even Republican ‘news’-sites refused to publish the article I wrote, because it exposed the fraudulence of a certain Democratic news-site — and this is unfortunately a journalistic no-no.

In other words: Not only do ‘news’-sites not expose journalistic wrongdoing that’s on their own political side, but they also hide the journalistic wrongdoing that’s on the opposite side of the political divide. Both sides actually work together, to fool the public in ways that are acceptable to — or even required by — the billionaires. This is the phenomenon that’s documented, in that link to ‘democracy’ — documented actually to exist in the U.S., and to control the U.S. Government.

Unless the journalistic taboo of hiding from the public the lies (including all of the easily preventable false and misleading assertions) that are published by other ‘news’media — thereby leaving such lies to pile up in basically the way that please all billionaires (and centi-millionaires) of all political parties — ends, there is no hope for democracy. Not even a hope. There is just the extension of the present real nightmare, into the future.  


About the author

EricZuesse

ERIC ZUESSE, Senior Contributing Editor

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity. Besides TGP, his reports and historical analyses are published on many leading current events and political sites, including The Saker, Huffpost, Oped News, and others.

horiz-long grey
What will it take to bring America to live according to its own self image?


[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]




New York Times cashes in on Facebook’s news censorship

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON IT.

By Will Morrow, wsws.org
27 January 2018
Notwithstanding the propaganda barrage over “fake news,” the fact remains that the greatest purveyors of “fake news” are the world’s governments and corporate media. First among these is the Times itself, whose columnist Judith Miller was a leading promoter of the lies about weapons of mass destruction used to drag the American population into war in Iraq.

The New York Times share price jumped 9 percent on Friday, January 19, following Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s announcement that the social media network will prioritise news from “trusted sources.” The newspaper’s stock has continued to rise by a further 2.1 percent in the week since.


Using Orwellian language to describe censorship, Zuckerberg, who has a net worth of $76 billion, said that Facebook will promote “trustworthy” sources to combat political “polarization” and help build a “sense of common ground.” He claimed that the level of trustworthiness of individual outlets will be determined by a survey of Facebook users, asking them if they are familiar with a news source, and, if so, how much they trust it.

The response to the announcement on Wall Street underscores that Facebook’s latest change will mean the promotion of establishment outlets like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the major cable TV broadcasters, along with the censorship of alternative and politically oppositional news sources.

The Times and the Post have been at the forefront of the drive to censor the Internet. The Times continued its campaign in an op-ed by Nina Jankowicz, a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute, published online yesterday. The column, “Russian trolls are only part of the problem,” openly admits that the effort to censor the Internet is not primarily about Russia.

Jankowicz writes that while it is “refreshing” that Facebook and Twitter “finally realized their culpability in the spread of online disinformation,” their solutions have concentrated “too heavily on removing Russian content while ignoring the problematic articles and posts created and shared by American outlets and users.”


The Times and the Post have been at the forefront of the drive to censor the Internet. The Times continued its campaign in an op-ed by Nina Jankowicz, a fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute, published online yesterday. The column, “Russian trolls are only part of the problem,” openly admits that the effort to censor the Internet is not primarily about Russia.

She concludes: “If these tech giants want to contribute to democracy instead of help to tear it down, they need to recognize that homegrown threats to civil discourse exist among the very users to whom they are bequeathing more responsibility.”

The Times has become increasingly fearful in recent years that the growth of the Internet and smartphone technology has allowed millions to circumvent its control over what the population reads, shares and sees. Two-thirds of the American population now access some news on social media, according to a September 2017 poll by the Pew Research Center.

The mainstream media outlets have seen their readership drop precipitously over the last two decades, as their functioning as state propaganda outlets has led growing numbers of people to turn to alternative sources of information. According to an annual Gallup poll, the proportion of Americans who trust the media to “report the news fully, accurately and fairly” fell to 32 percent in 2016, the lowest level since Gallup began asking the question annually in 1997. This compares to 76 percent who answered in the affirmative in 1976.

There is a confluence between the political efforts of the Times, in collaboration with the Democratic Party and the intelligence agencies, to censor the Internet and the direct financial interests of the newspaper and its corporate shareholders, including Carlos Slim, the largest public shareholder and the world’s seventh richest man.

The Times' average weekday circulation fell from over 1.1 million in 2002 to 575,500 in 2016, reflecting a broader decline in readership of print media. The circulation of the Post—which is privately owned (now by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos) and does not publicly report these figures annually—fell by 37 percent between 2009 and 2015, two years for which figures are available.

Despite the Times’ turn toward digital subscriptions, total advertisement revenue has fallen from approximately $1.3 billion in 2009 to $580 million in 2016. Last year, the Times announced a major restructuring, including the sacking of over 100 copy editor positions.

More than ever before, the mainstream media outlets, through a continual process over several decades of buyouts and corporate takeovers, have become concentrated in the hands of giant corporate monopolies, speaking directly on behalf of a tiny number of billionaires.

According to a 2011 Business Insider report, the number of media corporations that together control 90 percent of print, video and radio outlets fell from 50 in 1983 to six in 2011. They include Comcast (2017 revenue of $84.5 billion), the owner of NBC; and Disney (2017 revenue of $55.14 billion), which purchased the American Broadcasting Corporation in 1995 for $19 billion. These organizations view the democratic potential of the Internet as a dangerous threat to billions of dollars in profits.

Notwithstanding the propaganda barrage over “fake news,” the fact remains that the greatest purveyors of “fake news” are the world’s governments and corporate media. First among these is the Times itself, whose columnist Judith Miller was a leading promoter of the lies about weapons of mass destruction used to drag the American population into war in Iraq.

The Times sees its role not as a means of informing the population, but of serving the interests of the state and the ruling class it represents. It is an outlet that declared, in the words of its then-Executive Editor Bill Keller in 2010, that “transparency is not an absolute good,” and that “freedom of the press includes freedom not to publish, and that is a freedom we exercise with some regularity.” For the Times, censorship of the Internet and its online competitors is a business opportunity and a means for overcoming its longstanding decline in readership, profitability and influence.

Keller had earlier warned that the growth of the Internet brought with it the danger of “information anarchy.”

The changes to Facebook’s news feed algorithms are the latest fronts in a McCarthyite campaign, spearheaded by the Democratic Party and giant technology corporations, to present the growth of social and political tensions in the US as the outcome of Russian influence.

The political and media establishment is seeking to censor alternative sources of information, including socialist and oppositional websites such as the World Socialist Web Site, under conditions of mounting social discontent and the return of “great power” conflict.

The WSWS, which is taking up a fight against the drive to dictatorship, urges our readers to watch our webinar, “Organizing Resistance to Internet Censorship,” read the open letter from the WSWS International Editorial Board, “For an international coalition to fight Internet censorship,” and contact us to join this fight.

This author also recommends:

Bill Keller defends role of New York Times in concealing government crimes
[1 November 2013]

The New York Times’ Bill Keller on WikiLeaks: A collapse of democratic sensibility
[3 February 2011]


About the Author
The author is an analyst with wsws.org, a Marxian publication. 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

black-horizontal
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]




A Year Ago, Maddow Explained How MSM Would Use Russiagate To Escalate Cold War



horiz-long grey

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON IT.

 

Pro-empire disinformer Rachel Maddow—her gay icon status has given her extra credit and cover with many LGBT and feminist partisans.


I was just reminded by a reader that a few days ago marked the one year anniversary of Rachel Maddow announcing on MSNBC that Democratic party-aligned media outlets intended to use Russiagate and the infamous Steele Dossier to pressure the incoming Trump administration into escalating the new cold war with Russia. A year into the Trump administration and we can see plainly that this new president is already demonstrably more hawkish toward Russia than his predecessor.

Before I get into recapping Maddow’s seething neocon sleaze fest, please allow me to direct your attention to this excellent Truthdig article titled “How ‘Russiagate’ Helped Secure a Dangerous Arms Deal” by Max Blumenthal, which details the way neocons and Russia hawks on both sides of the political aisle have successfully used the Russiagate scandal to pressure this administration into selling weapons to Ukraine. As Blumenthal notes, this is an agenda these military-industrial complex lackeys have been aggressively pushing for years, and one the Obama administration refused to bow to for fear of the dangerous escalations with Moscow that it would cause.

This administration has escalated cold war tensions with Russia in various other ways beyond that, forcing first RT and then Sputnik to register as foreign agents, expanding NATO with the addition of Montenegro, establishing a permanent military presence in Syria to effect regime change, assigning neoconservative Russia hawk Kurt Volker as special representative to Ukraine, shutting down a Russian consulate in San Francisco and throwing out Russian diplomats as part of continued back-and-forth hostile diplomatic exchanges, selling an anti-ballistic missile system to Japan in what Moscow has been calling a violation of international missile treaties, and signing the Russian sanctions bill despite loud protests from the Russian Federation.

Now back to Maddow.

 

Two days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, Rachel Maddow did one of the innumerable tinfoil hat Russiagate conspiracy segments that have become the singular distinguishing feature of her career — but this time with a little twist. In an elaborate monologue that was only believable to people who desperately wanted to believe it, Maddow paced her audience through some information about the way the Soviet Union’s KGB used to gather compromising footage of rivals in order to sabotage them politically or blackmail them. Using the hilarious argument that the FSB is only two letters different from the KGB, the fact that Vladimir Putin was in the KGB, and the incredible allegations in the Steele dossier about Trump’s erotic romp with a gaggle of well-hydrated Russian prostitutes, Maddow attempted to make it seem perfectly plausible that this same president whose alleged affair with a porn star is being dismissed with a shrug by most Americans could be blackmailed into treason with a sex tape.

She then launched into the chorus of her song.

Maddow lit up with glee when talking about how much Russia hates the fact that Obama amassed troops along its border in the final days of his administration, and then made the claim that if Trump ever withdraws those troops, it will prove that Russia “has something on” him and is using it to blackmail him into compliance.

“And here’s the question,” Maddow said. “Is the new President gonna take those troops out? After all the speculation, after all the worry, we are actually about to find out if Russia maybe has something on the new President? We’re about to find out if the new President of our country is going to do what Russia wants once he’s Commander-in-Chief of the US military starting noon on Friday. What is he gonna do with those deployments? Watch this space.”

Maddow spoke these words with an all-caps “WE’LL BE WATCHING” graphic displayed on the right side of the screen, plainly telling her audience (and the incoming administration) that if Trump doesn’t maintain Obama’s lame duck cold war escalations, it will be taken and reported as a sign that Trump is a treasonous Kremlin puppet, with no further evidence required.

A year gone by and the neocons and Russia hawks on Capitol Hill have gotten the new cold war their military-industrial complex donors have so desperately craved, as have the oligarchs who own America’s mainstream media. Stephen Cohen, renowned scholar on US-Russian relations, says that Russiagate has been used to escalate tensions with Russia to what could possibly be their most dangerous point ever due to the political pressures on the Trump administration to never back down against Moscow for any reason.

If Trump is indeed a treasonous Kremlin puppet, he is the very worst in history, and certainly not worth the billions of dollars in investment the Steele dossier alleges were spent on him. Believing the allegations of the Steele dossier (which even its MI6 author claims is 10 to 30 percent crap) is to believe that the Kremlin had the genius and foresight to predict years in advance that Trump would one day become president back when nobody else imagined such a thing was possible and invest unfathomable amounts of money and resources accordingly, but not enough genius and foresight to imagine that that investment might result in what has ultimately happened.

The US oligarchs do not believe that Donald Trump is a Kremlin asset. Rachel Maddow does not believe that Donald Trump is a Kremlin asset. The neocons on Capitol Hill do not believe that Donald Trump is a Kremlin asset. The only people who believe that are the victims of the mass media propaganda machine who have been paced into collaborating with the manufacture of public support for new cold war escalations, using a moral panic caused by that same mass media about a president they were told is somehow simultaneously a treasonous double agent, a secret Nazi, an incompetent moron, and a raving lunatic.


There is no Trump-Russia collusion. There is a world-threatening and continually escalating cold war with many unpredictable moving parts which have more and more probability of going catastrophically wrong the further things escalate.

Congratulations, Rachel.

 

Thanks for reading! My work here is entirely reader-funded so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook, following me on Twitter, bookmarking my website, checking out my podcast, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon or Paypal, or buying my new book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

About the Author
 
Caitlin Johnstone
is a brave journalist, political junkie, relentless feminist, champion of the 99 percent. And a powerful counter-propaganda tactician. 


 Creative Commons License  This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

horiz-long grey

[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]

Parting shot—a word from the editors
The Best Definition of Donald Trump We Have Found

In his zeal to prove to his antagonists in the War Party that he is as bloodthirsty as their champion, Hillary Clinton, and more manly than Barack Obama, Trump seems to have gone “play-crazy” -- acting like an unpredictable maniac in order to terrorize the Russians into forcing some kind of dramatic concessions from their Syrian allies, or risk Armageddon.However, the “play-crazy” gambit can only work when the leader is, in real life, a disciplined and intelligent actor, who knows precisely what actual boundaries must not be crossed. That ain’t Donald Trump -- a pitifully shallow and ill-disciplined man, emotionally handicapped by obscene privilege and cognitively crippled by white American chauvinism. By pushing Trump into a corner and demanding that he display his most bellicose self, or be ceaselessly mocked as a “puppet” and minion of Russia, a lesser power, the War Party and its media and clandestine services have created a perfect storm of mayhem that may consume us all. Glen Ford, Editor in Chief, Black Agenda Report 


black-horizontal