The Islamic State: Is History Rhyming?

horiz grey line

//



 By Felix Imonti
Geopolitical Monitor | First iteration: November 26, 2014

ISIS fighters in a well circulated photo.

ISIS fighters in a well circulated propaganda photo.

 

The Islamic State has a library of ancient myths and prophecies it uses to lure warriors in a march towards the thirteenth century, where they will defeat the infidels in a great final battle in northern Syria. Whether they die and are rewarded with paradise or survive to enjoy the coming Utopia under divine rule, they will be the victors; and this is the appeal of the Islamic State.

On the 4th of July, Ibrahim ibn Awwad ibn Ibrahim ibn Ali ibn Muhammad al-Badri, alias Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi took center stage in the Grand Mosque in Mosul for the first time as Caliph Ibrahim, the Emir of the Faithful in the Islamic State. He wore the black robes of the Abbasids Caliphate that reigned from 750 to 1258.

ISIL-Irak-Syria-map_Muslims throughout the world were commanded to move to the caliphate and pledge their allegiance to Caliph Ibrahim. He had been appointed by the Shura Council that established the caliphate and had acceded to their wishes to assume the role of the Successor of Mohammad.

Abu Mohammed Adnani, a spokesman for Islamic State, announced to Muslims worldwide in a commentary titled “The Promise of God” that other organizations would have to acknowledge the supremacy of Caliph Ibrahim or face the wrath of the IS. Caliph Ibrahim declared that the Islamic State would encompass in five years the lands from India to Southern Europe. That would include Mullah Omar’s caliphate in Afghanistan, which has links to Al-Qaeda.  Neither organization has pledged its allegiance to Abu Bakr Baghdadi. The head of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood and many other Islamic scholars are also rejecting the demands of Abu Bakr Baghdadi to acknowledge his supremacy, but not the Islamic principles being promoted and not the idea of a caliphate.

 

The Dictates of History

ISIS-Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi-kalif-Baghdadi-islamistCaliph Ibrahim (above) offers believers a journey back eight centuries to the time of the Abbasids Caliphate when Islam was spreading far afield. It is that lost glory that he is trying to resurrect and impose upon the world. In keeping with the principles of that distant time, Christians and Jews are to be given the opportunity to convert, flee, or to pay a tax and live as second class citizens. All others are to be put to the sword, their property seized, and their wives and daughters violated and forced into slavery.  Everything is spelled out clearly in the Quran and in the “Majmu’ al-Fatawa” that was written by Sheikh Taqi ibn Taymiyyah after the fall of the Abbisids Caliphate. It is this doctrine that Ibrahim ibn Awwad ibn Ibrahim ibn Ali ibn Muhammad al-Badri studied as a doctoral student in Islamic studies at the Islamic University in Baghdad. The doctrine is a part of the curriculum at Saudi-financed, Salafi-oriented madrasas.

This is why the Islamic State does not hesitate to display the mass killing of prisoners or speak openly of enslaving Yazidi women and others. Their practices were approved thirteen centuries ago and are supported by other Salafists. Time has not modified those ancient teachings.

ISIS-Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi-microphone-

Believers are being offered a Utopian promise and the opportunity to reap revenge upon all of those infidels and false Muslims who have suppressed righteous Muslims throughout the world and over the centuries. “Revenge, revenge, revenge,” is the battle cry; and it has all been heard before.

 

Sheikh Wahhab Is Still Speaking

[dropcap]B[/dropcap]y whatever name we call him, the words of the new self-proclaimed caliph are taken straight out of the mouth of Shaikh Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab, who walked this road of revolution and reform through much of the eighteenth century. Because Caliph Ibrahim draws upon historical sources, he can be replaced with another candidate by the Shura Council if the need arises, thus representing an institutionalized succession procedure.

Sheikh Wahhab was a fundamentalist that rejected what he saw as the corrupting of the Faith. The practices of many Bedouins of praying to saints, giving a spiritual meaning to particular places, celebrating the birthday of Muhammad, and constructing monuments were all viewed as idolatry. True believers accept only God and his word.

The Sheikh invoked the practice of Takfir. The rule states that any Muslim who fails to uphold the Faith should be put to the sword, his property seized, and his wives and daughters violated. Under this practice, Shia and Sufis were not considered to be Muslims and not deserving of life.

The Turks and Egyptians who came on their pilgrimages to Mecca were considered to be particularly abhorrent. They traveled in luxury, smoked, and were declared to be Muslim pretenders. The sect substituted for nationalism and was directed against the foreign corrupt rulers before pan-Arab identity began to unite the tribes.

Ibn Saud, the leader of a minor tribal group in the Nejd saw in the sect a vehicle that could be used to forward his ambitions. Banditry could be transformed into jihad; and the defeated tribes could be given the choice of converting to the sect and to benefit in the spoils or die. If they died in battle, they would enjoy a direct move into paradise.

“The Sheikh [Wahhab] invoked the practice of Takfir. The rule states that any Muslim who fails to uphold the Faith should be put to the sword, his property seized, and his wives and daughters violated. Under this practice, Shia and Sufis were not considered to be Muslims and not deserving of life…”

What the Wahhabi Sect added to Islamic practice and what appealed to Ibn Saud was the requirement of the followers to give absolute loyalty to the political leader. To question the teaching or to fail submitting to the leader was cause for execution with the loss of property and the violation of wives and daughters.

By the end of the eighteenth century, the success of Saud was evident with much of the Arabian Peninsula under his control. His raid upon the important Shia center of Karbala in 1801 saw an estimated five thousand Shia slaughtered and their religious sites destroyed. That was followed two years later by the capture of Mecca and later Medina. [The House of Saud, so esteemed by Washington, was born in self-serving, brutal and cunning medievalism.—Eds]

The Ottomans could no longer ignore the carving up of their colonial territory by a desert tribe. An army of Egyptian troops was sent to settle the matter. The Wahhabi capital of Dariyah was seized and destroyed in 1818. Wahhabism receded into the Arabian Desert.

Yet it did not disappear. It remained the core philosophy of the Saud tribe and would become the core belief of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, from where it began to spread throughout the Middle East.

FILE - In this Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2015, file mage released by Saudi Press Agency, SPA, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, 2nd right first row, poses with Shura members at consultative Shura Council in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia's new monarch isn't wasting time. Since assuming the throne Jan. 23, King Salman has elevated some of his closest relatives and sidelined previous power-brokers, tightened decision-making and promised lavish payouts designed to win early goodwill. (AP Photo/Saudi Press Agency, File)

FILE – In this Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2015, file mage released by Saudi Press Agency, SPA, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, 2nd right first row, poses with Shura members at consultative Shura Council in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia’s new monarch isn’t wasting time. Since assuming the throne Jan. 23, King Salman has elevated some of his closest relatives and sidelined previous power-brokers, tightened decision-making and promised lavish payouts designed to win early goodwill. (AP Photo/Saudi Press Agency, File)

Wahhabism arose at a time when the foreign Ottomans were enjoying the benefits of being colonial rulers, which left a religious and political vacuum that Wahhabism eventually filled. Exactly one century after it was defeated, it arose anew with the fall of the Ottoman Empire and its dismembering by the British and French.

The tribes went from one colonial rule to another without having any say in what form their lands would take or what type of government would rule. After World War II, the European rulers were replaced mainly by autocrats. Where oil was exploited, the autocrats had riches that gave little benefit to the masses.

The destruction of the Saddam regime and the dismantling of the state structure by the United States in 2003 created the next vacuum that would give a new reform movement the opportunity to grow.

 

Revenge and Utopia

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]he strength of the Islamic State is that it gives the millions of impoverished people who see themselves as oppressed the opportunity to ride their 21st century tanks back to the promised Utopia, where the religious pure will reap all of the benefits and the disbelievers will receive their rewards at the end of a modern version of the sword.

ISIS-Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi-paintedWallPortr

If you believe, then all of the events that are converging in Syria were prophesized by Mohammad thirteen centuries ago, when he told the future generations that a great battle between Islam and the infidels would be fought out in northern Syria at the town of Dabiq near the Turkish border. That is where the old world will come to an end. It will precede the arrival of the Mahdi and the end of the world. Only the purest of the pure from the ranks of Muslims will enjoy the new state of peace and prosperity.

It has all been foretold, and the falling bombs on Islamic State positions in northern Syria are giving credibility to the ancient script for those who believe.

All that is needed to fulfill the prophecy is the arrival of an infidel army. The taunting of the United States by killing American citizens publically is intended to draw that army onto the battlefield to unite Muslims against the return of the Crusaders. If the United States rejects the challenge, it will be declared a coward and will confirm to followers of the Islamic State their strength. This is sure to give the movement even more appeal in the eyes of potential jihadists.


 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
 Felix-Imonti

Felix Imonti studied international relations at UCLA, where he was in the African Studies Program. He focused as well upon South and East Asia. He has traveled widely and has lived in seven countries. Recently, he returned to Canada after living for ten years in Japan. While in Japan, he was the director of investment strategies for a private equity firm. He has published a history book, Violent Justice, and has published many articles in a wide variety of publications. He has been interviewed on radio stations in the U.S. and in Australia. You can reach him at feliximonti@gmail.com, and his blog can be found at: www.watchinggeopoliticalgames.wordpress.com.


SELECTED ORIGINAL VIEWS

Avatar
  • 1. A very well written piece on the Wahabis and Saud. A there is a one significant hole in this that the authors should have taken more care to research. Violating enemy women is not spelled out in the Quran. It does allow them to be taken as maids, but that doesn’t translate to violation. Nor is this position unique to the Quran. Other religions also condoned this sort of behavior 2000 years ago. The bible also states ‘As for the women, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as plunder for yourselves’. The holy books at the time were taking the position of what was common practice in wars in that era.
    Neither has a place in today’s society. But to imply that this is in the Quran and that ISIS is just
    following whats written is no excuse for ISIS behavior. Had the Iraqi’s been not as corrupt and not spent the 7 years flushing out Sunnis out ofmilitary and not wasted my taxpayer $25BN that was used to train them, and stood their ground in Mosul against the 3,500 ISIS instead of
    running away, we would not even know or care who ISIS is.
    2. ISIS fighters are beasts: for every supposed compliant with Quran wishes to enslave infidel women, they have killed tens of thousands of muslims brutally in Syria and Iraq. The religion does not condone killing of other muslims. I state it to say the beasts are hypocrites and their behaviors have nothing to do with what their holy book says. They do as they wish, like any other savage group

    • Avatar

      Let the Muslim decide whether they have to do with Quran or not. Currently a lot of Muslims around the world are supporting them, and if they grow many more will join them.

    • Avatar

      2000 year ago that is where the similarities end. If you are justifying an act because it happened 2000 years ago then you really have no base for argument. The Quran does state that if labeled an apostate then death is possible.

  • Avatar

    I heard a young member of the Saudi government – not, I think, a member of the royal family – say at a ‘closed seminar’ at a university that the roots of ISIS reach back to the earliest days of Islam. I thought this was ironic because one of the ‘explanations’ for the rise of ISIS is promotion by Saudi Arabia. But now Saudi Arabia is concerned because, of course, he said, ISIS will eventually want the holy sites, which lie in the modern state of Saudi Arabia. Curiouser and curioser. Much is opaque to western eyes. As for the centrality of the modern state of Iraq, I remind outsiders that the Sunni-Shia split in Islam began in 680 AD in Kerbala, in southern Mesopotamia, now in Iraq.

  • Avatar

    Poverty, ignorance and smart or clever guys manipulating them. The history of humanity.


 

Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long greyNauseated by the
vile corporate media?
Had enough of their lies, escapism,
omissions and relentless manipulation?

GET EVEN.
Send a donation to 

The Greanville Post–or
SHARE OUR ARTICLES WIDELY!
But be sure to support YOUR media.
If you don’t, who will?

Statue-of-Liberty-crying-628x356
horiz-black-wide
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.


 




The Alamo: America’s Shrine to White Supremacy

horiz grey line

//


 


This week Ozzy Osbourne will tape a History Channel show in San Antonio where he will apologize for urinating on the Alamo Cenotaph in 1982. But why apologize?

Phil Collins, the former drummer with Genesis who went on to be one of the biggest pop stars of the 1980s (“In The Air Tonight,” “Invisible Touch”) was in San Antonio on June 26, 2014 for a press conference at the Alamo. Collins announced that he was donating his vast collection of artifacts related to the 1836 Battle of the Alamo to the museum which sits on the Alamo grounds, just up the street from San Antonio’s famed Riverwalk.

Collins, who traces his Texas obsession to recreating the Battle of the Alamo with figurines as a kid in his English backyard, has been visiting the site periodically since 1973. He has written a book, The Alamo and Beyond, which is a coffee-table tome with photos and essays he’s written about each of the two hundred items in the collection. Collins has also written a forward to a book on music about the Alamo.

Collins claims he may have actually been at the Battle of the Alamo 178 years ago. Perhaps it’s that psychic backstory which causes him to speak, ad nauseum, about only the details of the 1836 battle in which Mexican troops annihilated a force of two hundred men of the Republic of Texas army. Yet Collins says he supports a full interpretation of the Alamo’s entire history. So let’s go there.

The Mexican troops who attacked the Alamo are always described in the history books as the aggressors, so the first thing to clarify is that the Alamo was in Mexico. The so-called “Texians” who were in the fort representing the Republic of Texas were part of an attempt by U.S. slave states to expand the scope of slavery westward.

The Republic of Texas was an outgrowth of the colony founded under the leadership of Stephen F. Austin which brought slavery onto Mexican soil in 1821 (today Austin has a university named after him). In 1825, twenty five per cent of the 1,800 people in Austin’s colony were slaves and by 1836 there were 5,000 slaves in Texas. James S. Mayfield, Secretary of State for the Republic of Texas, said that “the true policy and prosperity of this country [Texas] depends on the maintenance of slavery.”

Toward that end, during the siege of the Alamo, delegates met at a Republic of Texas constitutional convention in Washington-on-the-Brazos. The Alamo defenders fought and died for that constitution, which declared in Sections 6, 9 and 10:

“All free white persons who emigrate to the republic…shall be entitled to all the privileges of citizenship.’

“All persons of color who were slaves for life previous to their emigration to Texas, and who are now held in bondage, shall remain in the like state of servitude… Congress (of Texas) shall pass no laws to prohibit emigrants from the United State of America from bringing their slaves into the Republic with them…nor shall Congress have the power to emancipate slaves; nor shall any slaveholder be allowed to emancipate his or her slave or slaves…no free person of African descent either in whole or in part shall be permitted to reside permanently in the Republic without the consent of Congress.”

Yet Phil Collins was pleased as planter’s punch to be inducted as an honorary member of the Sons of the Republic of Texas in 2008. He said that he was inspired by “The idea of these men and women, your ancestors, having a choice and staying to fight for what they believed to be just and right.”

Collins’ words would have been more appropriate if they had been addressed to the descendants of the Mexican troops who were resisting the slavers at the Alamo. Early in the nineteenth century slavery was abolished in Mexico and fugitive slaves from Texas or any other place were welcomed.

One of Phil Collins’ Alamo heroes is Jim Bowie, famed for the development of a long-bladed knife which became known as the “Bowie knife.” Less well-known is that shortly after the War of 1812, Bowie went into business as a slave trader and was a partner in a Louisiana sugar plantation. Bowie later moved to Texas where he was a leader of one of the most extreme group of expansionists.

The fever dreams of the Texians didn’t die at the Alamo. On March 1, 1837 the United States formally recognized the Republic of Texas, which joined the U.S. as a slave state in 1845. This was just in time to be a key part of the Mexican-American War, which resulted in the annexation of one third of Mexico’s territory. In 1861, Texas was the seventh state to secede and join the Confederacy.

In Phil Collins’ native England, hundreds of warships and hundreds of thousands of guns were manufactured for the Confederate Army. According to writer David Keys, this lengthened the Civil War by two years at a cost of 400,000 American lives. Only 183 men died at the Alamo. Phil Collins never mentions the disparity. Instead he says “You know, I’ve never been to Gettysburg. But we know what happened there, and you go to pay respects.” In other words, there were no real issues in the Civil War. It was more like a football game where some fans root for the South, some for the North.

Like many celebrities, Phil Collins is a pathetic ignoramus, a monochromatic cultural icon.

Like many celebrities, Phil Collins is a pathetic been childish ignoramus, and an unapologetic reactionary with a comic book understanding of history.

The war between Mexico and Texas-based reactionaries continues today. Phil Collins’ host at the San Antonio press conference was his friend Jerry Patterson, the outgoing pro-fracking Texas Land Commissioner who finished last in the 2014 Republican lieutenant governor primary despite the endorsement of Ron Paul. In that campaign, Patterson’s immigration platform was: No amnesty, militarization of the border, and a guest worker program to provide business with cheap labor.

Hollywood's bias in favor of the South, the Confederacy and similar ideologies is a curious phenomenon, considering that the studio system was long dominated by Jewish tycoons of humble origins.

Hollywood’s romanticization of the South, the Confederacy and similar ideologies is a curious phenomenon, considering that the studio system was long dominated by Jewish tycoons of humble origins.

[dropcap]D[/dropcap]ecades worth of demeaning stereotypes of Mexicans have helped to convince a section of the public to  support such measures. For example, the 1983 hit song “Illegal Alien” by Genesis, co-written by Phil Collins. The song’s singer (Collins) describes how his sister is willing to grant sexual favors to border guards in order to secure safe crossing for her brother. This is played for yucks, even though the reality of women on the border is an ongoing wave of rapes and murders. In the song’s video, Collins and the rest of the band portray themselves as lazy, drunken Mexicans.

This ties in neatly with the way that those inseparable twins, the Alamo and the Confederacy, continue to get good press in America. For instance, a July press conference featuring South Carolina football coach Steve Spurrier reflected the same politics as Phil Collins’ press conference at the Alamo. South Carolina opens its 2014 season at home against Texas A&M, whom the Gamecocks have never played before. The winner will get a trophy named after South Carolina native and Alamo defender James Bonham.

was in Mexico.”

“I’m sure Bonham did some good things,” Spurrier said. What might those be? James Bonham  was the older brother of Milledge Luke Bonham, a brigadier general in the Confederate Army who served as Governor of South Carolina from 1862 to 1864. Earlier, the elder Bonham served as an aide to Governor James Hamilton Jr. during the Nullification Crisis of 1832, a direct precursor to Southern secession. It’s no surprise that James Bonham died fighting for slavery at the Alamo.

Conditioned by everyone from John Wayne to Phil Collins, by everything from movies to children’s books to the constant hype about the state of Texas, 2.5 million tourists visit the Alamo every year. They have no  idea what it represents. Republican Governor Rick Perry knows, which in 2012 led him to endorse a petition drive calling for  the secession of Texas from the Union, the result of which would be the end of any lingering protections for women, children, immigrants, and workers. The petition generated much boastful talk about states rights and living as an island in North America. How long could people live on such an island? Texas already ranks last in health care services. Yet 125,000 Texans saw fit to sign the petition. Phil’s friend Jerry Patterson opposed secession, saying it would be better instead to expel New York, California, Connecticut, and Massachusetts from the United States.

Such clown politics continue to defile the American body politic while providing useful cover for the Democrats, who have nothing better to offer in Texas or anywhere else. In the background, Phil Collins sits at his drum kit, counting off the beat and playing out of time.


Rock and Rap Confidential author of the forthcoming book Love and War: My First Thirty Years of Writing. He can be reached at: Rockrap@aol.com


B O N U S

Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long greyNauseated by the
vile corporate media?
Had enough of their lies, escapism,
omissions and relentless manipulation?

GET EVEN.
Send a donation to 

The Greanville Post–or
SHARE OUR ARTICLES WIDELY!
But be sure to support YOUR media.
If you don’t, who will?

Bandido-Rev-eazyDraw
horiz-black-wide
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.





Understanding Trump, Easy: Carson, Hard? Well, no

Steven Jonas, MD, MPHpale blue horiz
Special to The Greanville Post
SJ TGP Short Shot* No. 3: Understanding Trump, Easy: Carson, Hard? Well, no

trump-arrogant

[dropcap]U[/dropcap]nderstanding Trump is easy, for he is just saying out loud what the Repubs. have been saying since the time of Nixon, with “a-wink-and-a-nod” slogans and what have come to be known as “dog whistles.”  He is an open racist and usually makes no bones about it.
..
It happens that lately he has also delved into racist dog whistle territory, using the hoary old Nixon one, the “silent majority.”  Trump defenders say that “oh that’s not racist; it just refers to ‘fed-up’ people.”  Well, a) there are plenty of fed-up people who have nothing in common with Trump (e.g., Bernie Sanders).  And b), what it meant was well-known when Nixon used the phrase to help launch his not-secret and highly successful “Southern Strategy” to electorally take over the South from the Democratic Party.  Not to say that every Trump supporter is a racist, but he certainly appeals to a racist electorate, which is a significant part of his base.  Those who are not racists should know better than to associate themselves with him, but that is another matter.

[dropcap]S[/dropcap]o what about the African-American neurosurgeon Ben Carson?  If the GOP is so racist, how can he be doing so well (at least for now)?  Well, while racists often react to people they don’t know on the basis of the color of their skin, when such (rare) African- and Latino-U.S. persons (e.g., Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio) come in on the reactionary side of politics, racists obviously do listen to what they have to say.  After all, if that were not so, how come South Carolina, the Cradle of the Confederacy, has a Republican African-American Senator, Tim Scott?  And then think about the meteoric rise (followed by that precipitous fall, of course) of Herman Cain in 2012.


ben-carson

And so, let’s to go to Dr. Carson’s website to see what he stands for: he is firmly anti-choice (apparently with no exceptions); for a “Balanced Budget” Amendment (apparently excluding the military); for “local control” of schools (something already built into public education in the U.S., but what the hey); for keeping the prison at Guantanamo Bay open (shows U.S. “strength,” donchaknow); for repealing Obamacare (of course); big on “faith” (when questioned about what that means, he comes across as a closet Dominionist, which is presumably why he is so popular with the Right-wing evangelicals currently boosting his poll numbers in Iowa); for preparing to attack Russia (even though he didn’t know that the Baltic States are part of NATO [of course, John McCain thought that Iraq bordered on Afghanistan, but no, John, there’s another country whose name begins with “I” that stands between them]); for amending the Second Amendment so that only its second clause is operative (just as Scalia did functionally in Heller); maintaining the Likud/Republican alliance; and shutting down the IRS.

[dropcap]A[/dropcap]nd then there’s what he doesn’t talk about: how racial discrimination affects every part of life for African-Americans; mass incarceration; police violence and the militarization of the police; Republican voter suppression; and so on and so forth. 

He is VERY mainstream Republican (while apparently a closet Dominionist as well).  Holds to no positions that would get Republicans upset.  Has no chance for the nomination.  And he is a “non-politician.”  So if you are a Republican and want to pretend that your party does not run on racism and has not done ever so — Nixon, Reagan (of the “welfare queen” dog whistle), G.W. Bush of the “Willie Horton” ad, down to the present time — why not Carson?  At least for now.  And then you can say, “see, I’m not a racist.  I support the black guy.”


[box] This is one of a series of (relatively) short columns that I will be writing for The Greanville Post over the next several months while I devote more of my weekly writing time to finishing a book that will be published next spring by The Greanville Post’s relative, Punto Press (which just happens to be the same company that published the 2013 version of my book The 15% Solution, referenced just below).[/box]

Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 7.41.15 PM

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

P78

Senior Editor, Politics, Steven Jonas, MD, MPH is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at Stony Brook University (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 30 books. In addition to his role with The Greanville Post, he is a Contributor for American Politics to The Planetary Movement, a columnist for BuzzFlash@Truthout, a “Trusted Author” for OpEdNews, and the Editorial Director of and a Contributing Author to The Political Junkies for Progressive Democracy.  Dr. Jonas’ latest book is The 15% Solution: How the Republican Religious Right Took Control of the U.S., 1981-2022: A futuristic Novel, Brewster, NY, Trepper & Katz Impact Books, Punto Press Publishing, 2013, http://www.puntopress.com/jonas-the-15-solution-hits-main-distribution/, and available on Amazon.




YahooLand Rants: Tomi Lahren “flogs” Obama. For all the wrong reasons. [ANNOTATED}

Screen Shot 2015-08-22 at 7.41.15 PM

22-Year-Old TV Annihilates Obama, Ruthlessly Handing Him His Butt On Live TV

Friday, August 28, 2015  |  (Reposted on Before It’s News)

tomi-lahren-466x350

 

[box type=”download”] Editor’s Annotation



 The rant  is being distributed, among other channels, by The Voice of Reason (sic). Links to their site(s) are provided.


NOTE: The YouTube video below was furnished by Huffpost Ltd and carried the following deck:

Published on Jul 21, 2015

NEW YORK — A TV news anchor’s flag-waving commentary on the Chattanooga shooting went viral on Monday due to some provocative lines suggesting the US should respond by sending bombers to the “desert.”

Tomi Lahren took aim at President Obama’s response to the threat of radical Islamism, decrying his “be friendly to jihadists mentality.” The jingoistic outburst was performed in front of a backdrop featuring an American eagle soaring across Old Glory.

 

horiz-black-wide

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

www.thelastgreatstand.com

SOMEONE CHECK OBAMA’S EYEBROWS…

I THINK THEY WERE JUST SCORCHED OFF!

WOW! A 22 YEAR OLD ANCHOR!

Tomi Lahren has a strong message for President Obama following the murder of five U.S. servicemen in Chattanooga last week: Call it what it is, and show Islamic terrorists “what the U.S. of A. looks like up close and personal.”

https://youtu.be/cQlBDk5GyZU

The 22-year-old, who hosts One America News Network’s “On Point with Tomi Lahren,” devoted her “Final Thoughts” segment to Obama’s response to the massacre.

22

After ticking off a list of causes that were not responsible for the massacre, she said, in part:

President Obama, if you won’t say it, I will: radical Islam. This is not workplace violence. This is not a criminal act with motives unknown. This is terrorism. The suspected shooter, Mohammad Abdulazeez, a devout Muslim.

This is the 21st time our military men and women have been attacked here at home. This is not a Middle East problem; this is an American problem.

Radical Islamists have brought the fight right here to the Red, White and Blue and it’s about time we bring it to them. Full force.

Let’s show them what the U.S. of A looks like up close and personal. Show ’em what a B1 bomber looks like flying overhead. Show ’em what they’re messing with. Put the fear of OUR God in their desert. Because clearly our lack of strategy isn’t working.

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

THE VOICE OF REASON




Oath Keepers “patrol” Ferguson armed to the teeth and with impunity.

oath-keepers-from-across-the-country-pour-into-nevada_042014[box type=”download”] The Oath Keepers—allowing for a different age and a different national culture—are the US version of the German Freikorps, an ultra-right wing armed militia composed mostly of unemployed former WWI soldiers and virtually organized with the support or direct guidance of the Reichswehr to combat workerist and communist mobilizations and uprisings during the turmoil engulfing Germany between the wars. Many in the Freikorps would later join the growing Nazi party. The fact they are allowed to strut around, intimidate, take up sniper positions and other acts not remotely allowed regular citizens, let alone Ferguson residents, is proof conclusive where the state sides in this social and race conflict.


This is the Wiki’s passage on them:
In the early 20th century, Freikorps were raised to fight against the newly formed Weimar Republic, as well as their left-wing counterparts, through the early 1920s. These paramilitary organizations “roamed the countryside, killing with impunity.”[1] “They engaged in bloody confrontations with republican loyalists and engineered some of the more notorious assassinations” of the Weimar period, and are widely seen as a “precursor to Nazism”.[2] An entire series of Freikorps awards also existed, mostly replaced in 1933 by the Honor Cross for World War I veterans.

[/box]

ABC US News | World News

READ BELOW HOW AP REPORTED THE SITUATION

[learn_more] The return of an armed militia group patrolling the streets of Ferguson drew criticism Tuesday from both protesters and the county police chief overseeing security amid ongoing demonstrations marking the anniversary of 18-year-old Michael Brown’s shooting death. St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar said the overnight presence of the Oath Keepers, wearing camouflage bulletproof vests and openly carrying rifles and pistols on West Florissant Avenue, the hub of marches and protests for the past several days, was “both unnecessary and inflammatory.”


Belmar plans to ask county prosecutor Bob McCulloch about the legality of armed patrols by the far-right anti-government activist group, which largely comprises past and present members of the military, first responders and police officers. But Missouri law allows anyone with a concealed carry permit to openly display a firearm anywhere in the state. John Karriman, a representative of the group who teaches at the Missouri Southern State University police academy, said there were five armed Oath Keepers at the Monday night protests and that another 45 or so unarmed group members were stationed nearby to try to help keep the peace. He said members plan to remain in Ferguson “at least through the end of the week.” “A handful of us were visible,” Karriman, a former police officer in Joplin, Missouri who ran unsuccessfully as a Libertarian Party candidate for county sheriff in southwest Missouri. “The rest of us are behind the scenes.”


Oath Keepers previously showed up in Ferguson in November after a grand jury declined to indict former Ferguson officer Darren Wilson in Brown’s death, saying they stationed themselves along several downtown rooftops to protect businesses from rioting and looters. Karriman said the group stepped in only after Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon declined to summon the National Guard in the aftermath of the grand jury decision. County police ordered them to leave then, but group members intermittently returned. The five armed Oath Keepers, all of whom appeared to be white, interacted freely with police late Monday and early Tuesday but endured catcalls and jeers from demonstrators. Protest organizer Nabeehah Azeez called the presence of the armed men “a contradiction in how things work.” “The rules don’t apply to everyone,” she said. “If those were black men walking around with rifles, they probably wouldn’t be living today.”[/learn_more]

Published on Dec 1, 2014

In the mist of some of the most racially charged violence in recent American history, the Oath Keepers militia seem intent on making matters worse. As you’ll recall this is the group that famously came with guns to the Bundy Ranch back in April to protect the millionaire Cliven Bundy from the tyranny of having to pay taxes. The group has decided that Ferguson needs their help.

Sources:

Oath Keepers patrolling Ferguson say they’re prepared to use lethal force, Raw Story
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/11/oa…

Mike Ilitch, Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Ilitch

Oath Keepers Guarding Businesses in Ferguson, Missouri: Calling on Volunteers to Assist, Oathkeepers.org
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2014/11/2…

Screen Shot 2015-08-05 at 6.19.17 PM

A RIGHTWING V FOR VENDETTA

FACT TO REMEMBER:
IF THE WESTERN MEDIA HAD ITS PRIORITIES IN ORDER AND ACTUALLY INFORMED, EDUCATED AND UPLIFTED THE MASSES INSTEAD OF SHILLING FOR A GLOBAL EMPIRE OF ENDLESS WARS, OUTRAGEOUS ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, AND DEEPENING DEVASTATION OF NATURE AND THE ANIMAL WORLD,  HORRORS LIKE THESE WOULD HAVE BEEN ELIMINATED MANY YEARS, PERHAPS DECADES AGO.  EVERY SINGLE DAY SOCIAL BACKWARDNESS COLLECTS ITS OWN INNUMERABLE VICTIMS. 

pale blue horiz

[printfriendly]

REBLOGGERS NEEDED. APPLY HERE!

Get back at the lying, criminal mainstream media and its masters by reposting the truth about world events. If you like what you read on The Greanville Post help us extend its circulation by reposting this or any other article on a Facebook page or group page you belong to. Send a mail to Margo Stiles, letting her know what pages or sites you intend to cover.  We MUST rely on each other to get the word out! 


 

And remember: All captions and pullquotes are furnished by the editors, NOT the author(s). 


What is $5 a month to support one of the greatest publications on the Left?




PuntoPress_DisplayAd_REV