Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Vanessa Beeley • Brian Berletic
ABOUT THE AUTHOR / SOURCE An expert in Mideast affairs, Vanessa Beeley is a British blogger, journalist and anti-imperialist activist.
Print this article
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW
Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Eric Zuesse
On July 26th, Russia’s RT News headlined “Putin makes Africa sovereignty pledge: The Russian president has addressed the continent’s leaders on the eve of a major summit in St. Petersburg”, and reported that, “In a welcome address to participants of the Russia-Africa Economic and Humanitarian Forum in St. Petersburg, scheduled for July 27 and 28,” Russia’s President Vladimir Putin said that “we will continue to assist our African partners in every way possible to strengthen national and cultural sovereignty [and] to participate more actively in resolving regional and global issues.”
Just a day before, “Kremlin Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov claimed that Western countries, particularly the US and France, were putting ‘unprecedented pressure’ on African countries to prevent them from attending the summit.”
In other words: America’s and France’s Governments fear that Russia will assist African nations “to strengthen national and cultural sovereignty [and] to participate more actively in resolving regional and global issues,” and so are doing whatever they can to cause some of the invited Governments in Africa not to attend that conference in Russia.
“According to Russian officials, the summit will be attended by 49 African delegations, with 17 governments being represented by heads of state.” Any of those 49 that won’t show up would be a mark of success for the U.S.-France efforts to squash Russia’s effort.
On July 24th, BNN Network News had bannered “Russian President Putin Advocates for Africa’s Rising Global Authority”, and opened:
As the world awaits the second Russia-Africa Summit and Russia-Africa Economic and Humanitarian Forum in St. Petersburg, Russian President Vladimir Putin has expressed his support for Africa’s rising international authority. In an article released ahead of the summit, Putin noted that Russia’s partnership with Africa is rooted in stability, trust, and goodwill. He emphasized that Russia has always supported African nations in their struggle against colonial oppression and in developing their statehood, sovereignty, and defense capabilities.
Apparently, Russia (just like China, in its approach) is relying upon African nations’ negative experiences of U.S.-and-allied imperialism, in order to attract Africa's nations to an alternative to The West’s win-lose exploitative and coercive model of economic and social development, so as to enable constructive, win-win, international relationships to take root and to grow, so that (from Russia’s and China’s perspective) the hostile efforts by the imperialists (the practitioners of win-lose international relations, or of the supremacism-subordination model of international relations that is virtually universal in Western political-‘science’ theorizing and discussions) will become less and less successful at weakening or destroying — but, in either case, at bringing to heel — the rest of the world.
The source of this conflict between, on the one hand, The West and northern countries against, on the other hand, The East and southern countries, first appeared in August 1941, when America’s President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) first met the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister Winston Churchill, in Nova Scotia (they hadn’t met before), so as to coordinate their respective Governments’ responses to the obsessively imperialistic Adolf Hitler’s plans to conquer ultimately the entire world, as Hitler had explained in numerous speeches and in his first book, in 1925, Mein Kampf (and in more detail in his secret Second Book in 1928, which wasn’t published during Hitler’s lifetime). FDR and Churchill clashed intensely over imperialism — Churchill supporting it and committed to continuing his Empire, versus FDR condemning it as being the master-slave reltationship on an international level and therefore repugnant to any supporter of democracy. The two men were thus strongly at odds over what the post-WW-II world-order should be, but FDR decided to suspend that disagreement until if and when the UK, U.S., and Soviet Union, would win WW II. At that 1941 meeting, FDR (together with his chief aide on this, Sumner Welles) began his planning for a future United Nations which would be a global democratic federation of nations, whereas Churchill began his planning there for, instead, a future U.S.-headed NATO military alliance to conquer the Soviet Union: Churchill was wanting what became “the Cold War.” Under Churchill’s plan that he had gotten as a young man near the end of the 1800s, from Cecil Rhodes who came up with it in 1877, the UK would use subterfuge to take back control over the U.S. and thereby continue and extend even farther England's empire by suborning American power via a shared Deep State (what Churchill dubbed the "Special Relationship," which became installed by the naive Truman and has ruled the U.S. ever since). For the details of FDR’s plan for post-WW-II, see Sumner Welles’s book Where Are We Heading?, which he wrote and published in 1946, when he already recognized that Truman was destroying it and that the result could be another world war between contending groups of empires — contending military alliances: “We are witnessing a clash of empires,” he wrote (p. 243). The Cold War had already begun. He recognized that this had nothing to do with “a conflict between Soviet Communism and Western democracy,” and that any such ideological disagreements “cannot obscure the basic fact that the fundamental issue is the antagonism of opposing empires” — PRECISELY WHAT FDR’s plan for his U.N. was aimed to PREVENT. Here is how that reversal of FDR’s plan had happened:
FDR died on 12 April 1945, Truman took over, and The San Francisco Conference that wrote the U.N.’s Constitution or “Charter” — the basis for future international law — convened during 25 April to 26 June 1945, and the person who dominated and had veto-power over everything that is in the U.N.’s Charter turned out to be not FDR but his successor Harry Truman, who despised FDR and replaced his entire Cabinet within two years. Later, Truman wrote to his chief aide, the conservative southern Democrat James Byrnes, saying "At San Francisco no agreements or compromises were ever agreed to without my approval.” So, this is a considerably watered-down U.N., not the one that its inventor and original mastermind had been intending.
Russia and China today are trying to establish gradually the type of international world order that FDR had been planning to establish as soon as the UK, Soviet Union and United States would together win WW II. The joint effort now by Russia and by China is trying to undo Truman’s plan for the U.S. Government to take over the entire world — for the U.S. Government, instead of the United Nations, to control international law and to be the final arbiter of international relations — but, in order to culminate that anti-imperialistic plan, Amendments will need to be made to the U.N.’s Charter, such as to define the term “aggression” so that the very concept of “international war crime” can become more than what it now is, which is merely a phrase in international propaganda, pertaining more to international politics than to actual international law.
Print this article
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW
Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
Editor's Note: Because some illustrations and videos provided by the author in the original cannot be imported due to technical issues, we have substituted equivalent items provided by our Telegram account.
A recent video published by the UK Guardian sums up the calamitous state of the war for the Kiev regime side, as apparently debris from Patriot missiles rain on the civilian population. (Dateline: May 31, 2023)
Print this article
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW
Did you sign up yet for our FREE bulletin?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS
Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.
By Hermetikus
[COMMENT BY karloft1]
Putin conducted a tour of an exhibition being held at Zotov Center. Here is some info on that:
Vladimir Putin toured stands on architecture and urbanism, fashion and culture, design and tourism. The exposition presents, in particular, Russian brands of clothing and footwear, costume jewelry and jewelry, watches and accessories, handicrafts products, entertainment content of domestic production, including film, video games, animation and music, technology devices, specific examples of the development of the tourism potential of the regions.
"Zotov Center" is open after reconstruction in the building of the former Moscow bakery No.5 in November 2022. His projects are devoted to the study of the theory and practice of constructivism. Exhibition The space brings together works from Russian collections and storerooms museums, as well as private collections.
The person guiding Putin on the tour, General Director of the Agency for Strategic Initiatives Svetlana Chupsheva, asked the question Paco linked to @12:
Today we are meeting with you in the creative space "Zotov Center". I will tell you everything in a moment, Mr President, but I cannot help but ask first of all the question that concerns everyone today.
In the morning, there was a drone attack on Moscow and the Moscow region. Can you give an assessment of what happened, what measures need to be taken to prevent this from happening again, and how we should respond to it?
Putin's reply was a review of the overall history of the situation in an effort IMO to explain the Why. IMO, although most know this history, his answer ought to be provided in full:
Vladimir Putin: You know, it all started a long time ago. I'll just take two steps from the center of the field-I'll have to repeat it.
After the collapse of the USSR, it was inevitable that there would be some kind of competition between Russia and Ukraine-this goes without saying, but, apparently, those who were engaged in this, proceeded from the fact that everything would happen in a civilized way and, moreover, on the basis of our closeness, common historical, cultural, linguistic and so on next. But everything went the other way, unfortunately, which is also to be expected.
Basically, the territory called Ukraine was controlled from the very beginning by people who, led from the West, took the path of fighting not just with Russia, but creating an "anti-Russia"in this territory.
They had to take into account people who lived in the south-east of Ukraine-these are voters, a large number of voters, they had to take into account. Let me also remind you that during the formation of independent Ukraine from the very beginning, from the first step, Ukraine declared itself a neutral state – the Declaration of Independence says so.
Instead, they gradually-gradually-took a different path-joining NATO, an organization that is hostile to Russia and was created solely to fight the Soviet Union, Russia.
And in 2008, without any external signs, any military-political tension, they announced that they were joining NATO, they wanted to join NATO, and the Western countries-the countries of the alliance-in Bucharest, in my opinion, at the summit announced that the doors to NATO were open for Ukraine. Not only were we deceived and told that there would be no NATO movement to the east – but they also reached Ukraine. Well okay.
In 2014, as you know, they made a coup d'etat and simply began to destroy everyone who would like to build normal relations with Russia in one way or another. And in addition, they started a war in the Donbas, fighting. Then they deceived everyone to lull their vigilance, saying that they wanted to resolve the issue by peaceful means.
Now they are already openly saying that they cheated only in order to accumulate forces and unleash military operations, including in relation to the Crimea. Now, as you know, they have reached the point of drone strikes.
The Russian Armed Forces that were forced to respond-Russia was forced to respond to the war unleashed by the Ukrainian regime in the Donbas, we were all forced to respond with the launch of a special military operation - are striking at the territory of Ukraine, but with high-precision weapons of long range precisely at military infrastructure facilities or at ammunition depots or fuel and lubricants used for conducting combat operations.
We have already discussed the possibility of attacking decision-making headquarters and decision-making centers. Of course, the Ukrainian military intelligence headquarters, which was hit two or three days ago, also belongs to this category.
In response, as you know, the Kiev regime chose a different path-the path of attempts to intimidate Russia, intimidate Russian citizens and attack residential buildings. This, of course, is a clear sign of terrorist activity.
First of all, I want to say that the Moscow air defense system worked normally and satisfactorily, although there is something to work on. We faced the same problems at the Khmeimim airfield in Syria, and the territory of our Khmeimim air base itself and Moscow, a huge European metropolis, is simply not comparable. But in general, it is clear what needs to be done to strengthen the air defense of the capital, and we will do it.
But I am not so much concerned about this as about attempts to provoke a response from Russia. Apparently, it is designed for this: they provoke us to mirror actions. Let's see what to do about it.
But the citizens of Ukraine, who, of course, do not have a word now, because total terror has been unleashed against the civilian population in Ukraine, still need to know what the current leadership of this country is pushing for, and just understand that there are still other threats associated, for example, with attempts to disrupt the work at the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant or use some "dirty" devices of this kind related to the nuclear industry. We've already said this many times: we know what they're up to.
It is clear that, no matter what we say, they will always look for the culprits in Russia, but this is not so: we did not unleash this war, I repeat, in 2014-the Kiev regime unleashed a war in the Donbas - and we do not use the means that the Ukrainian bigwigs use.
And this attack on peaceful facilities in Moscow is another proof of this. But I repeat once again: the air defense system in our capital worked normally. We have a lot to work on, I'll say it again, and we know what needs to be done.
Clearly, Putin's answer was directed at all Russians, not just Muscovites. I recall what Putin said about the terrorists involved in the Second Chechen War who were also backed by CIA/MI-6, that there's no negotiating with them as they're all to be eliminated wherever they're found. IMO, those words like so many others were never heard by the West, but they stand as policy nevertheless. The US Congress funds Terrorists and has for decades. I wonder what percentage of Russia's population know that fact and how they feel about it? And of course, it's easy to understand why Putin vowed to eliminate the Outlaw US Empire's hegemony and why China and other nations agree.
Posted by: karlof1 | May 30 2023 15:40 utc | 27
@29
What the Russians are doing by way of their conduct is demonstrating a clear distinction between themselves and the US-led block of maniacs. An accurate accounting of what's happened will show the Russians were literally dragged into this.
Posted by: chunga | May 30 2023 15:46 utc | 28
NOTE: The above are comments excerpted from Moon of Alabama's dispatch on the same topic, Drones Strikes In Moscow - Missile Strikes In Ukraine, published on 30 May 2023. As usual, MoA is among the top platforms for quality in reporting on current strategic affairs.
Print this article
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of The Greanville Post. However, we do think they are important enough to be transmitted to a wider audience.
Unfortunately, most people take this site for granted.
DONATIONS HAVE ALMOST DRIED UP…
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW
| | | |
@29
What the Russians are doing by way of their conduct is demonstrating a clear distinction between themselves and the US-led block of maniacs. An accurate accounting of what's happened will show the Russians were literally dragged into this.
Posted by: chunga | May 30 2023 15:46 utc | 28