Russian people celebrate their great victory over Nazi aggression

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



Russia marks 75th Victory Day anniversary with spectacular Red Square military parade




Jun 24, 2020 

President Vladimir Putin joined a spectacular Red Square military parade on Wednesday to mark the 75th anniversary of the Soviet Union's World War II victory over the Nazis. The event was initially postponed from May 9 because of the novel coronavirus outbreak, despite critics say it is irresponsible to go ahead with it now. Putin delivered a speech at the celebration, on the eve of a nationwide vote that could extend his rule until 2036, patriotic display critics say is designed to lift his lower than usual ratings. Putin, flanked by veterans, did not wear a mask, but people around him had been tested for the coronavirus, including veterans quarantined at a resort outside Moscow beforehand. Thousands of people thronged Moscow's streets to watch tanks roll through the city on what was a public holiday.

Let us all salute the heroic Russian people!


Units dressed in WW2 uniforms march past the reviewing stands.

 



[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





 



Corona proving the loser of the Cold War was both the USSR & the USA 

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

 


This is part of a series of dispatches by correspondent Ramin Mazaheri


It is often boasted in the US that they forced the implosion of the USSR via military overspending, as if recklessly creating a dangerous and useless arms race was something to brag about. However, the spoiled American rich kid is about to get his comeuppance and learn that money does not equal virtue.

The coronavirus hysteria, the West’s foolish Great Lockdown and the West’s looming transition from the “Great Recession” to the “Great Depression 2” is revealing that the delayed consequences of this overspending - and the hyperfinancialised economy that effort entailed - is causing a second implosion of historic consequences.

When “the Chinese century” is writing the history books they will correctly say it like this: the decades of success and persistence of the USSR forced the US to take the economic measures which ultimately caused its own demise.



S I D E B A R 


Matching the yanks: The Soviet Typhoon

The arms race with the US, while by no means as decisive a factor in the USSR collapse as the Americans proclaimed, caused substantial problems for the Soviet leadership. With a GDP about 1/6 that of America, they had to theoretically make an effort 6 times bigger to just reach expense parity. The SSBN Typhoon or Akula (Shark) class submarine was a Soviet/Russian nuclear ballistic missile submarine. A new type of the ships had been developed as a reaction to the United States Navy's new Ohio-class submarine. The Typhoons were the largest submarines ever built. In many areas of military hardware, the USSR astonished the world. Russia continues that tradition. 

The USSR was not beaten by industrial capitalism - it was more than equal as a competitor there - but by financial capitalism. The coronavirus is but a minor malady compared to that disease, certainly. The USSR was certainly not constrained by rules of Islamic finance, but it certainly did not engage in any of the usurious, Ponzi scheme-like, fake-money amassing financial crimes which the West relied on to defeat the Soviets.   

The creation of credit-fueled financial bubbles may have bought the Pentagon some fancy toys, but it also bankrupted the US economically, ideologically and culturally - how could virtue and success ever be the final result of an insane, sovereignty-violating, global-sized war on other people’s types of socialism?

Despite all the ignored democratic votes, the influence of money and lobbyists and a vast amount of other evidence, Western liberal democracy does not admit that it does indeed have a vanguard party and that this party is bankers. The US vanguard party is in the process of imploding the US system against the will of their people, exactly like the vanguard party of the USSR did in 1991.

Quantitative Easing economic-political policies will become the historical equivalent of perestroika economic-political policies - two steps which should have never been taken, and which will ultimately be seen as the cause of the demise of the 20th century’s two dominant powers.

When the West can’t honestly explain WWI, stagflation, the War on Terror, QE Infinity, etc. something is being repeatedly hidden about their system

In early April’s Corona rewrites capitalist bust-chronology & proves: Its the nation-state, stupid I pointed out how the corona economic hysteria was giving us more crucial data about capitalism with Western characteristics” - it was providing a bookend to a new Western economic era within the context of Marx’s correct analysis that capitalism lurches from boom to bust. I sketched five historical cycles, from Boom 1, beginning in 1865, up to the current era, the 2020 beginning of Bust 5.

On May 13, in Scarce jobs + revenue desperation = sure Western stagflation post-corona, I noted the current similarities between the near-term future of the US economy with the beginning of the Bust 3 era - the 1970s. I pointed out that not only was Western capitalist theory incapable of explaining how stagflation could occur, they were similarly unwilling to honestly explain what ended it. Western intellectuals and schoolchildren are also similarly dumbfounded regarding the start of World War One - I related the common leftist analysis on May 4: the cause was high finance collusion. It is to this stagflation era where we must return to, as it contains the seeds of modern QE.

Capitalist-imperialist economies require war to produce the profit and growth which their system is built around - they need stolen wages (slavery), the free resources provided by “new frontiers” (the imperialism-rationalising theory of “Manifest Destiny”), new markets (which must be governed by their own puppets), or a constant war machine. When the Vietnam War ended in 1975 the US economy ground to complete halt because their economy had lost these raisons d’être, and their intellectuals could not explain what to do economically.

Nobody could explain it, because nobody could be honest and say that the 20th century US economy was undoubtedly modelled on corporate fascism (which is why after World War II Washington immediately found a natural alliance with their brother corporate fascist states of Germany and Japan) and guided by the Pentagon in Eisenhower’s famous “military-industrial complex” analysis… but it now had no slaves, no frontiers left and no wars.

Vietnamese heroism had capped similar bravery by Cubans, North Koreans, Chinese and Soviets, and combined with the MAD of nuclear weapons the corporate fascist concept of “economy as war machine (in order to eradicate redistributing socialism)” had failed, thus the endemic stagnation of the 1970s.

End of story/end of history.

Not so: the long-awaited, never-seen open discrediting of “corporate fascism with American characteristics” was put off (for four decades) thanks to the massive, phony “Star Wars” armaments buildup under Reagan, which provided a new morning for the US corporate-fascist economy and culture.

The idea was to outspend the USSR and divert their resources from citizen happiness and stability, but we now see that Washington bureaucrats & NYC intellectuals had no economic endgame: how would the US ever stop spending? They simply did not care that they had no answers, such was (and still is) their rabid anti-socialist/anti-redistribution mentality.

They were also in a very dire situation: back in the 1970s the American/Western Dream was decidedly failing at home, i.e. corporate fascism was failing, and entirely due to the cultural victory of socialist ideology within the West itself. Their soldiers (correctly) had zero desire to keep dying in order to uphold the tenets of corporate fascism in Vietnam - which is to say that the anti-imperialist ideology of socialism had prevailed culturally in a significant manner in the US. At the same time Western labor unions never had so many members and influence - i.e. the labor solidarity ideology of socialism had prevailed culturally in a significant manner as well.

Thus for all the alleged stagnation and corruption in the Brezhnev era, corporate fascism in teh US was even more stagnant, corrupt and domestically delegitimised. Abroad, the Western imperialist war machine had run out of free - but violently wrested - lunches and resources.

Thus the era of Western financial falsification began.

If the USSR and the socialist alternative had not been standing as a viable systemic alternative, the US would not have resorted to such desperate, ultimately suicidal tactics.

How can corporate fascism revive a stagflation economy? Via financial deception, which can’t go on forever

In corporate fascism the military decides how money is redistributed not the civil service (as in socialism), with bankers providing the intellectual vanguard party. Their intellectual vanguardism is not proven like in China or Iran - via devising ever-more efficient and moral governance - but is tested by their ability to devise new financial deceptions in order to keep the US system going.

In 2020 corona is proving that such a tandem, and led by such a foolish war (on socialism), not only was always incapable of sweeping the globe in a Pax Americana but could not even ensure the prosperity of its own citizens.

Reality was first admitted in 1971 when Nixon went off the gold standard: by making the US and their military allies use dollars, not gold, the war in Vietnam stopped being so very unprofitable for the 1%. But one financial deception necessarily begets another, of course.

Absolutely nobody is more reactionary than a monarch, thus the Petrodollar was created. After all, the West doesn’t believe democracy is possible in an Islamic society anyway, right? This was the second instrument of hyperfinancialisation, an ideology which obviously only benefits those connected to high finance, i.e. the 1%.

Both hyperfinancialisation and the desire to break socialisms cultural gains required the alleged “solution” to stagflation - breaking the housing market by increasing the prime interest rate to 20% in 1981. This rolled back the economic cushion US workers had acquired, and also sucked the value of homes from the owner back into the 1%-dominating system - more profits via financial deception.

The logic of hyperfinancialisation necessarily led to deindustrialisation and delocalisation of production, despite the obvious damage to the nation and its economic independence. Of course, breaking national economic independence within the West as well is the goal of neoliberalism/neo-imperialism, as evidenced by the Eurozone, that “neoliberal empire”. Hyperfinancialisation was the apex of Anglo-English liberal (bourgeois/aristocratic) economics and therefore the greatest pro-socialist proof that capitalism is truly the result of class warfare waged by a colluding international 1%.

By gutting housing assets, breaking labor’s power, permitting inflation in prices of energy and food, and breaking with the traditional sources of revenue, profit and hard, true wealth - necessitated because they were breaking with financial reality - a vast expansion of credit to the 99% was also needed, and credit card use began in earnest.

All of these 1980s-era decisions, including Star Wars, drastically changed the American system but were entirely in keeping with the logic and goals of corporate fascism.

Yes, these decisions did work and did lead to ten good years in the US, Boom 4 (1991-2001), but Bust 4 for the 99% began in 2001 and still continues until today; Boom 5 (2009-19) was only limited to the 1%’s asset classes and termed the “Great Recession” for the 99%. The Petrodollar and all these other fabrications enjoyed major profits, but in liberal/aristocratic democracy and their inevitable corporate fascism these profits are only hoarded among the 1% - this raison d’être could not be clearer from the last great deception from the West’s vanguard party: QE.

Bust 5 is the post-Corona era and will be called the Great Depression 2.

The only good news is: “the Western economy” is not synonymous with “the global economy”, so socialist-inspired nations will ride out Bust 5 just as they have been forced to ride out all the other inevitable busts of capitalism-imperialism.

This historical analysis of recent US economic history is thrown into clear relief by corona and the Great Lockdown. It says much that Western pro-capitalist economic commentators are so existentially distraught at the 2020 implications of the very real “QE Infinity” that only I am asking Why havent we called it QE 5yet? And why we must call it QE 2.1instead. They are so flustered they cannot even count from 4 to 5 right now.

But that is how very destabilised, how very gutted, how very sad Western capitalists are right now - they cannot deal with or describe reality, just as their similarly foolish intellectual ancestors could not deal with or accurately describe World War I, stagflation, the Petrodollar, the phony War on Terror, etc.

The corona overreaction is bringing down a history of lies, and not a short history either.

It’s quite a simple conclusion: the West could neither beat the USSR nor defeat the rising tide of domestic socialism without resorting to the economic suicide/Ponzi scheme inherent in phony hyperfinancialisation.

Hyperfinancialisation is simply no way to run a real economy, and Soviet commentators said the same thing in the 1980s - corona is proving them right.

So I guess it turns out that corona really is as dangerous as the elitist Western commentariat warned…. 

It is now 100% obvious that the Western system cannot and will not win: if QE is stopped the Western system collapses; if the West gives a debt jubilee or huge amounts of People’s QE this is no longer capitalism-imperialism but socialism.

Salute the Soviets: the martyrs of World War II, the only “empire” which bled the centre to feed the periphery, and soon the martyrs whose final act was to fatally wound - unknowingly - the elitist & racist American empire of corporate fascism.

We cannot really blame early socialists for not seeing this coming - financial capitalism was not as progressed as it is today, so they had less data. Who could have imagined that capitalists would be so stupid as to believe that quantitative analysts/computers using algorithms knew more about real life and the decidedly non-mathematical study of economics than human analysts? A theory (a comprehensive understanding) of capitalism which drew much from Lyonnais silk factories, which employ just 800 people today, needs adaptations to accommodate 21st century hyperfinancialisation stupidities and perpetuations of non-reality - this does not at all invalidate the core theory of socialism, no matter how much the West refuses to even teach and discuss this core theory.

But what is really collapsing? It is not neo-imperialism, because Western domestic belief in that ended with Vietnam: the War on Terror was the phoniest of wars, and also one which was a new type of war - one fought with huge amounts of paid mercenaries, 5th columnists and foreign radicals, as opposed to one fought by a truly national corporate fascist war machine like before. The War on Terror is a neo-imperialist war, but it was the death throes of two centuries of Western imperialism as we know it. The phony War on Islamic democracy (after the West failed to militarily defeat socialist democracy) only enriched the Pentagon-connected 1%, and the proof of that is all over the economic data since 2001.

Thus, what’s collapsing in 2020 in the largest historical sense is “capitalism with English characteristics”.

We can argue about the minority percentages of French, Spanish, Dutch, Austrian, German and Italian capitalism in this ideology, but we must agree that this system never collapsed - it passed from the English to the Americans; it was blitzed, but English liberalism (based around aristocratic privileges/liberties for the leaders of an imperialist & corporate war machine) has never been discredited nor defeated.

But this collapse is bigger than just the US and England, however - thus, “Western” is really the best name for it.

Washington recklessly decided that any risk was worth it in their effort to “win the Cold War”, i.e. destroy the ideology of socialism and its twin pillars of economic and political redistribution of power. In 2020 the Chinese laugh out loud to that possibility; in 2120 they will say that the single victor to the Cold War was not China, but socialism.

When the USSR imploded there was a system available to immediately welcome it - Western capitalism-imperialism. But when capitalism - which falsely views itself as victorious, although corona is teaching many the truth - implodes, socialism is still there, still thriving, and still not resorting to poisonous deceptions which perpetuate illusions.

*********************************

Corona contrarianism? How about some corona common sense? Here is my list of articles published regarding the corona crisis.

[bg_collapse view="button-orange" color="#4a4949" expand_text="Corona related articles" collapse_text="Show Less" ]

Capitalist-imperialist West stays home over corona – they grew a conscience? – March 22, 2020

s QE: the Trumpian populism they hoped for? – March 23, 2020

A days diary from a US CEO during the Corona crisis (satire) March 23, 2020

– March 25, 2020

Tough times need vanguard parties – are social media usersthe Wests? – March 26, 2020

If Germany rejects Corona bonds they must quit the Eurozone – March 30, 2020

Landlord class: Waive or donate rent-profits now or fear the Cultural Revolution – March 31, 2020

– April 1, 2020

(A Soviet?) Superman: Red Son – the new socialist film to watch on lockdown – April 2, 2020

s the nation-state, stupid – April 3, 2020

Condensing the data leaves no doubt: Fear corona-economy more than the virus – April 5, 2020

Were Going Wrong: The Wests middling, middle-class corona response – April 10, 2020

Why does the UK have an armyof volunteers but the US has a shortage? – April 12, 2020

No buybacks allowed or dared? Then wave goodbye to Western stock market gains – April 13, 2020

Pity post-corona Millennials… if they dont openly push socialism – April 14, 2020

No, the dollar will only strengthen post-corona, as usual: its a crisis, after all – April 16, 2020

Same 2008 QE playbook, but the Eurozone will kick off Western chaos not the US – April 18, 2020

Were giving up our civil liberties. Fine, but to which type of state? – April 20,

2020

Coronavirus – Macrons savior. A united Europe’ – Frances murderer – April 22, 2020

Irans resistance economy: the post-corona wish of the Wests silent majority (1/2) – April 23, 2020

The same 12-year itch: Will banks loan down QE money this time? – April 26,

2020

The end of globalisation wont be televised, despite the hopes of the Western 99% (2/2) – April 27, 2020

What would it take for proponents to say: The Great Lockdown was wrong? – April 28, 2020

– April 30, 2020

Given Western history, is it the Great Segregationand not the Great Lockdown? – May 2, 2020

The Western 1% colluded to start WWI – is the Great Lockdown also a conspiracy? – May 4, 2020

May 17: The date the Great Lockdown must end or Everything Bubble 2 pops – May 6, 2020

Reading Piketty: Does corona delay the Greensfake-leftist, sure-to-fail victory? – May 8, 2020

Picturing the media campaign needed to get the US back to work – May 11, 2020

Scarce jobs + revenue desperation = sure Western stagflation post-corona – May 13, 2020

Frances nurses march – are they now deplorable Michiganders to fake-leftists? – May 15, 2020

Why havent we called it QE 5yet? And why we must call it QE 2.1instead – May 16, 2020

Take your stinking paws off me, you damned, dirty public servant!Thats Orwell? – May 17, 2021

May 21, 2021

I was wrong on corona – by not pushing for a US Cultural Revolution immediately – May 25, 2021

August 1: when the unemployment runs out and a new era of US labor battles begin - May 28, 2021

[/bg_collapse]

[post-views]

About the author
I’ll Ruin Everything You Are: Ending Western Propaganda on Red China. His work has also appeared in various journals, magazines and websites, as well as on radio and television. He can be reached on Facebook. 


[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


black-horizontal



Victory Day 2020 Donetsk People’s Republic / День Победы 2020 ДНР

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



Russell Bonner Bentley


Editor's Note: Russell Bentley, American expat and volunteer antifascist soldier in the struggle of Eastern Ukraine's young republics of Donetsk and Lugansk against Kiev's Nazi-infested, NATO-supported regime, has produced a moving video showing the people of Donetsk commemorating Russia's victory in the Great Patriotic War. Simple and eloquent, the images say it all. I believe that decent people everywhere who understand these things, what WW2 meant to so many in terms of losses, pain and sacrifice,  will have a tough time holding back the tears. Paul Robeson's singing is a most felicitous addition.—PG.  

DESCRIPTION: The BEST video of DPR Victory Day parade 2020! Filmed from inside the car. With the Hymn of the Soviet Union, in English, sung by Paul Robeson. Directed by Russell Bentley, Filmed by Red Hampton and Lyudmila Bentley, edited by Red Hampton. Real goosebump material! Subscribe, Like, SHARE!!!

 
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
russellBentleyRussell Bonner Bentley, aka "Texac", is an American-born writer and volunteer soldier currently serving with the Novorossiyan Armed Forces (NAF), as the young republics in Eastern Ukraine confront the assault of the US-created and nazi-dominated Kiev regime.  Russell incarnates the spirit of the Lincoln Brigades, and Jack Reed. Besides his duties as a frontline fighter, Russell also works as a war correspondent. His chronicles about the situation in that strategically critical region, featured as "War Diaries" on The Greanville Post, are also distributed to other leading left publications, reaching a global audience. 



[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

black-horizontal

Keep truth and free speech alive by supporting this site.
Donate using the button below, or by scanning our QR code.





And before you leave

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.




Russian filmmaker speaks the (often obfuscated) truth about the USSR during WWII

An evening with Vladimir Solovyov, April 9, 2020.

[dropcap]A[/dropcap]n excerpt form the popular Russian talk show “An evening with Vladimir Solovyov”. Translated and subtitled by Eugenia. A well-known Russian filmmaker Karen Shakhnazarov discusses the meaning of the WWII memory for the Russian society and the Russian people. The context of the discussion was the proposed constitutional amendments. Translator’s notes: (1) The Soviet division consisted of 10,000 soldiers. (2) The British light cruiser Edinburgh carrying 5.5 tons of the Russian gold as payment for Western supplies was sunk by a German submarine on its way home from the Soviet port Murmansk in April of 1942. Shakhnazarov mistakenly said that it happened in 1941.

Please make sure to press on “cc” to see the English language subtitles.

 
 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License





 
 CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

black-horizontal




OPEC++ Or A Dead Shale Industry?

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.

DISPATCHES FROM MOON OF ALABAMA, BY "B"
This article is part of an ongoing series of dispatches from Moon of Alabama


Global oil glut.

[dropcap]T[/dropcap]oday there is a meeting by video of the OPEC states and Russia. Tomorrow the energy ministers of all G-20 states will likewise meet. Their discussions will be about the sinking global oil price caused by a lack of demand due to the novel coronavirus pandemic and record oil output from Saudi Arabia and Russia. 'Western' media have been optimistic that an agreement will be found:

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and other producers including Russia, a group known as OPEC+, are expected to discuss record cuts equivalent to 10% to 15% of global supplies, although demand has plunged by up to 30%.

It is unlikely that OPEC will agree on any cut unless the U.S. and other large producers join the deal. The U.S. is, for now, unlikely to do that.

Until the end of the last OPEC+ agreement this month and the onset of the pandemic demand slump, the three top producers were the U.S. with 12.7 million barrels per day, Russia with 10.9 mbpd and Saudi Arabia with 9.8 mbpd.

Since 2016 OPEC and Russia had reduced their production to keep the oil price in the $60/b range. This effectively subsidized the U.S. shale industry. U.S. production kept growing while production by Russia and Saudi Arabia was artificially limited. It allowed the U.S. to grab more global market share at profitable prices.


Source: Macrotrends - bigger

When the pandemic arrived Saudi Arabia urged Russia to agree to further production cuts. But that would have kept the price of oil high enough for the U.S. shale industry to grow at additional costs for Saudi and Russian production. Russia was not willing to allow that.

Now, as the prices have dropped to $20 per barrel U.S. shale oil is no longer profitable and the shale companies are on the verge of going bankrupt. That is clearly one outcome that Russia would like:

As soon as U.S. shale leaves the market, prices will rebound and could reach $60 a barrel, Rosneft’s Igor Sechin said recently. As fate would have it, in what many would have until recently considered an impossible scenario, a lot of U.S. shale might do just that.

Breakeven prices for U.S. shale basins range between $39 and $48 a barrel, according to data compiled by Reuters. Meanwhile, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is trading below $25 a barrel and has been for over a week now.

But Russia also offered an alternative:

A new OPEC+ deal to balance oil markets might be possible if other countries join in, Kirill Dmitriev, head of Russia’s sovereign wealth fund said, adding that countries should also cooperate to cushion the economic fallout from coronavirus.
...
“Joint actions by countries are needed to restore the (global) economy... They (joint actions) are also possible in OPEC+ deal’s framework,” Dmitriev, head of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), told Reuters in a phone interview.

That was an invitation to the U.S. to join a OPEC++ deal and to commit itself to production limits.

We discussed why the U.S. was unlikely to do that. Joining a cartel does not fit its neoliberal mindset:

“We’ve been benefiting from the lack of a free market for so long, the administration is torn about how to keep us a major producer while ostensibly keeping a free market, and I don’t think there’s a way to square that circle,” said [Randolph Bell, director of the Global Energy Center at the Atlantic Council].

Trump made a small counteroffer when he said that the U.S. oil output has already been reduced by 1.2 million barrels and that this was a sufficient U.S. contribution to limiting outputs:

“Nobody’s asked me, so if they ask I’ll make a decision,” Trump said on whether the U.S. would participate in cutbacks. U.S. producers are “already cutting back and they’re cutting back very seriously. I think it’s happening automatically.”

But for Russia that is hardly enough:

Russia does not consider a supply reduction driven by falling demand or lower prices to be a real output cut within the parameters of the proposed OPEC+ deal, the Kremlin said on Wednesday. It was the first statement from Moscow about this crucial aspect of the talks and indicated that President Vladimir Putin may be expecting a more significant contribution from the U.S. than his counterpart Donald Trump is willing to give.

“You are comparing the overall demand drop with cuts aimed at stabilizing the global market,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters at his daily conference call, when asked if Russia would accept U.S. production cuts driven only by market forces. “These are completely different things.”

Washington has so far offered what officials described as “automatic” and “market-driven” cuts, which are expected to happen as companies from Exxon Mobil Corp. to independent shale explorers slash spending in response to low prices.

If the U.S. insist that "automatic" and "market drive" cuts are all it will contribute then its shale oil industry will have to die.

A new OPEC++ deal will require hard production cuts and limits that the government of the U.S. will have to guarantee for several years. A few additional good will gestures towards Russia will likely also be required.

But the Trump administration is adverse to binding international agreements. Its officials instead play their usual game of issuing empty threats:

Republican U.S. senators who have introduced a bill that would remove U.S. defense systems and troops in Saudi Arabia unless it cuts oil output will hold a call with the kingdom’s officials on Saturday, a source familiar with the planning said on Tuesday.

Writing nasty letters which demand that Saudi Arabia carries the burden of the unprecedented demand slump are useless in this situation. The normal global demand is 100 mbpd. It has now fallen to nearly 70 mbpd and is unlikely to revive during the next 18 month. Even if Saudi Arabia would end all of its production the markets would still be oversupplied. It would also destabilize the country which depends on the sale of its oil for 70% of its budget.

If the U.S. insists that the Saudis cut their production to save its shale oil producers the Saudis might break the old deal that makes the U.S. dollar the leading currency of the globe. If they decouple their currency from the U.S. dollar and demand payments in Euros, Yen or Yuan the U.S. dollar is toast.

The threats will not help at all. They only make Saudi Arabia more determined to go its own way.

Some people in the U.S. oil industry have caught up with the new reality:

Some old-guard Texas oil drillers are urging state regulators to clamp down on crude production to halt a price collapse more severe than any of them have ever lived through.

The largest U.S. oil-producing state hasn’t restricted crude production in almost 50 years but a growing chorus of explorers and related industries are advocating just such a move. The Texas Railroad Commission that has overseen the state’s industry for more than a century is scheduled to discuss so-called pro-rationing on April 14.
...
Kirk Edwards, an industry veteran and chief executive officer of Latigo Petroleum LLC, estimates that within a month the oversupply will be so massive that Permian Basin drillers will no longer be able to send crude to refineries in the Houston area and Louisiana.

“Until two weeks ago, I was 100% against the use of proration in Texas to remedy these kinds of problems,” Edwards said in a letter to the agency. The commission and the Trump administration need to “step up to the plate and save Texas and the American energy industry right now, before it is too late.”

But the big industry players do not want a cut for everyone:

The appeals for supply caps highlights a growing schism between small, independent explorers and international behemoths like Exxon Mobil Corp. that oppose government intervention. In neighboring Oklahoma, oil-industry trade groups are at loggerheads over whether state regulators should step in.

The calculation for big and rich companies is different. They hope that the small producers will go bankrupt so that they can buy their already developed oil fields at record low prices. The would keep those shut down but would reopen them when prices are back to higher level.

Exxon is likely to have more political clout than the small producers who now fear for their companies.

Today's OPEC+ talks are ongoing and they seem to prepare an offer that will then be proposed at tomorrow's G-20 meeting. The U.S., Canada, Brazil, Norway and others would then have to commit to make proportionally similar cuts.

But how big is the chance for that to happen?

Posted by b on April 9, 2020 at 18:25 UTC | Permalink


 

Comments  Sampler

So typical of Putin that his timing and strategy are always "no choice but you sign the document".

This is like the Debaltsevo Cauldron. The Ukies and NATO troops are surrounded. Germany and France had to beg to save the NATO troops, while the Ukies were left to be slaughtered. Then they all signed the Minsk 2 Accords, without Russia signing anything.
Then, Putin took the Accords to the UNSC for its backing. That left the Ukies no way out of Minsk 2. It has choked them ever since.

Right now, U.S. shale will live or die based on what Putin wants. Trump can refuse. But then Trump kills shale, not Putin.

Everyone can have a $45-60 industry, but if not, then the US goes back to very little shale, no Energy Independence, and when they are busted and shuttered, the price will go to $60 like Igor Sechin (Rosneft) predicted.

Posted by: Red Ryder | Apr 9 2020 18:45 utc | 1

re: Congress posturing to put pressure on Saudi Arabia

Much of the Saudi budget is recycled back into the US to buy military equipment and services... That industry is one of the very few that has as much influence on Congress than the oil/gas industry. The more likely "solution" is that they will receive a bailout.

Posted by: ptb | Apr 9 2020 19:28 utc | 2

US Shale Oil is a Ponzi Scheme that's only survived because of essentially free credit and most damning is it takes more energy to extract than it provides. The bonds issued by its companies are correctly regarded as Junk. If it were an actual profit making enterprise, its bonds would be A or better. The bond ratings have always told the truth about shale oil. Part of the massive bailout is to cushion the fall when all those bonds are defaulted. Shales actual affect on global market was to lessen the amount of US imports that when combined with domestic demand destruction lowered overall price. The key for the US oil market is its refinery capacity (Large PDF). Here's the latest from Bloomberg. Gasoline demand is down 50% Y/Y! and refiners are only now beginning to adjust. And when refiners don't refine, they don't make any money, and many were already on extremely tight margins causing them to delay the ongoing maintenance their facilities demand lest they blow up like the one in Philadelphia last year--it's now closed permanently.

There's going to be lots of blood spilt in the oil patch as the year goes forward, and the Ponzi Scheme will be exposed for what it really was--a very expensive jobs program.

Posted by: karlof1 | Apr 9 2020 19:44 utc | 3

@ptb #2
If the oil fracking industry is producing 6 million barrels per day and prices are $20+ below production costs, then the cost to subsidize the industry is $120 million dollars per day. 6 months of this subsidy will be $22 billion.
The subsidy would likely need to run at least a year, more like 2 or 3.
Is Trump willing to divert a mere $90 billion from the stimulus bills to the oil fracking industry?

Posted by: c1ue | Apr 9 2020 19:49 utc | 4

The calculation for big and rich companies is different. They hope that the small producers will go bankrupt so that they can buy their already developed oil fields at record low prices. The would keep those shut down but would reopen them when prices are back to higher level.

Indeed, that's also what I'm observing. The exploitative reforms post-2008 didn't work: the gig economy extracted some surplus value from the working class, but the space for a new cycle of accumulation revealed to be too small.

Now, with the COVID-19, the great bourgeoisie (big business) realized they can find more space for expansion by destroying small and medium businesses at the First World and at the "developing economies".

To be fair, the petit bourgeoisie was already at a "zombie state" (i.e. zero profit, zero growth) in the First World since the 2008 meltdown. They are indeed parasites of the system, and destroying them will indeed open new vital space for the expansion of capitalism (in the form of big business). However, my take is this margin will also be small: the petit bourgeoisie was mostly in capilary small scale businesses with naturally low productivity rates, mostly local restaurants, barber shops, small groceries and other stores, extremely capilarized self-employed services (plumbers, electricians, prostitutes, therapists etc. etc.). Those sectors give big business little space for automation, being more like a Uber scenario (i.e. deepening exploitation of labor). It won't save the system.

Capitalism is now, literally, devouring itself. Take pictures now, because that's a rare scene.

--//

Brazilian oil stock suddenly fell today (just one hour ago) - wiping out all its gains of two days. The OPEC++ deal will most likely fail.

--//

With the threat of the pandemic over, China is already attacking the USA and Western Europe on the financial sector, is prepared to eat up their market shares:

China eyes more market-oriented economy to spur growth

When Xi Jinping unified power in China in 2012, the country already was the industrial superpower. His "reform and opening up" doctrine's ultimate aim is to also make China a financial superpower. This is a necessary evil, as only being the industrial superpower makes you susceptible to outside strangling thanks to the control of the flux of money-capital from the financial superpower (the USA). Also, it supress the welfare of the people of the industrial superpower, since it needs to keep reclycling its money reserves in treasury debt papers of the financial superpower, creating the unjust scenario where the people of former keeps producing much more than it consumes, while the people of the latter keeps consuming much more than it produces.

Xi Jinping wants to end this circus. He wants China to unify the championship belts.

This "reform and opening up" is all about China rise to financial superpower status. If it fails, Xi will enter History as the Chinese Nikita Krushchev. It's all in for his project.

Posted by: vk | Apr 9 2020 19:55 utc | 5

@ c1ue

Why would he budge? Right now someone has to go bankrupt in the oil budiness because of overproduction and because many countries actually make an effort with renewables mid to long term. So he might ask his advisors why it should be American companies which have to go bankrupt. They will tell him something rational like the increased costs of production in the US and he won't care. It's a weak move, especially until after the elections.

Posted by: Del | Apr 9 2020 19:57 utc | 6

survival of the fittest, except when russia and ksa are the fittest, lol... i thought russia was just a gas station?? fracking is expensive.. those who frack are going to lose out here...i would love to see ksa go off the us$, but i think they are smart enough to know that will be the end of ksa too.. i am curious to see what comes out of the talk today.. as @1 red ryder notes - putin/russia is in the drivers seat - again.... no wonder capitalism wanted open access to russia back in the early 90's and the dream of yukos oil got lost in the shuffle to where we are now..

Posted by: james | Apr 9 2020 20:11 utc | 7

OFF TOPIC
Has enyone spotted! There is a big argument going on !
At off guardian Twitter account attacking MOA. RIGHT NOW !!
Off Gardian full on denial based on truth deprivation syndrome ! It’s getting ugly !

Posted by: Mark2 | Apr 9 2020 20:23 utc | 8

To borrow a phrase from Mad John McCain, America is a (shale) gas station masquerading as a nation.

Posted by: ak74 | Apr 9 2020 20:24 utc | 9

Trump is not deal capable in this case. He cannot agree to regulate production because he is surrounded by ideologues that detest government and any form of self regulation. They will rather die off in a battle of attrition than yield to regulation.

Market crash on immense scale is likely over the next few days. No bears, no bulls, just ignorant pigs.

Posted by: uncle tungsten | Apr 9 2020 20:29 utc | 10

hmmm... does that mean that the longer we accept house arrest the better chance we have to see the fall of the houses of the US and KSA in our lifetime?
i would start to look at it positively!

Posted by: Mina | Apr 9 2020 20:31 utc | 11

 


[premium_newsticker id="213661"]


 


About the author(s)

"b" is Moon of Alabama's founding (and chief) editor.  This site's purpose is to discuss politics, economics, philosophy and blogger Billmon's Whiskey Bar writings. Moon Of Alabama was opened as an independent, open forum for members of the Whiskey Bar community.  Bernhard )"b") started and still runs the site. Once in a while you will also find posts and art from regular commentators. You can reach the current administrator of this site by emailing Bernhard at MoonofA@aol.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
 ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

black-horizontal