Why Planes Don’t Fly Faster

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


This essay is part of a series on cultural, scientific and esoteric matters.



 
Editor's Note: Numerous comments on the YouTube page point to errors in the Wendover video narration concerning technical issues relating to engines, engine types, aircraft, and so on, but this does not detract from the overall value of this presentation. 
 
 

[premium_newsticker id="211406"]


 

 
 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


 




A Brief History of Intermittent Fasting

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.





Editor's Note: A growing number of readers have asked us to expand our topicality beyond purely political to other areas of personal and social interest, such as the sciences. They regard TGP as an all-round dependable and trustworthy information and cultural source (something we take as a compliment and vote of confidence in our credibility). As regular readers know, TGP has always been a rather unusual and eclectic place, with many articles covering subjects well beyond the normal diet of political analyses, fascinating and important as they may be, and this has included the sciences. Curiosity, after all, is a huge avenue to discovery, and the mind is enriched by finding things in the unexpected.  Have a look, for example, at this "installation" we did years ago to celebrate tango, the journey of life, and many topics related: Remembrances & Thoughts On the Streets of Buenos Aires In the Year 2006.). So here's now this most interesting piece by respected physician Paul Spector on intermittent dieting, a remarkable practice that is at last receiving serious attention.


A physician explains why time-restricted eating is nature’s anti-aging diet

 

[premium_newsticker id="211406"]


 

 
 




Asia Times reports that China aims to break US high-tech stranglehold

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



GORDON WATTS
ASIA TIMES


Excerpts
[dropcap]H[/dropcap]uawei launched a promotional 5G trailer for the media last year and now the ultra-fast networks are being rolled out across China. Photo: AFP / Fred Defour

Xi’s 14th Five-Year Plan will bristle with future technology funding in a move to dominate the sector

Tech-tock … tech-tock. The countdown has started for the Ministry of Science and Technology to compile its wish-list for China’s next five-year blueprint.

Major “industrial players” will be asked for their input before the S&T drafts its 14th Five-Year Plan from 2021 to 2025. They will include Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu, or the BAT grouping, along with Huawei and ZTS, as well as a host of state-owned enterprises.

Every department of President Xi Jinping’s administration will go through this procedure in the next few months to highlight key areas, or sectors, worthy of government investment.

High-tech will be at the front of the queue. In November, a 147.2 billion yuan, or US$21 billion, mega-fund was rolled out to upgrade the manufacturing industry as part of an estimated $110 billion research and development budget.

Yet those numbers will be dwarfed by the spending figures for the next five-year plan as China goes head-to-head with the United States for future tech supremacy.

“In 2020, science and technology relations will reach another critical point,” Li Zheng, of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations in Beijing, said earlier this month. “In recent years, the contradictions and differences between the two countries in this field have risen significantly.

“The United States regards the rise of Chinese technology as a threat and is setting obstacles to the free flow of technology, data, capital, markets and talent between the two countries through legislation and executive orders [from US President Donald Trump],” he added.

Read: China and US in trillion-dollar tech war

Read: High-tech, high risk for China’s economy

“Some scholars worry that China and the United States may decouple in the technology arena in the next 10 years. The technology industry chain of the two sides will be broken, and replaced by incompatible technology standards, products and services,” Li wrote on China-US Focus, an academic website.

But then, science and technology will be the “critical battlefield in” this “great power competition,” according to Trivium, a policy research site in Beijing, specializing in China’s political and economic landscape.

For the S&T, six industries have been earmarked, including energy, IT, manufacturing and biopharma.

“All technologies should service national strategies, including competitiveness in core technologies and national security,” Trivium pointed out. “[But] forecasting which future technologies will be most important in a given sector is no easy task.

“This is one way for the government to get industry insight and know-how, while also offering various stakeholders a chance to lobby industry regulators,” it added.

Again, this is an integral part of Beijing’s policy as it “tools up” for a new Cold War with Washington. At the heart of the dispute will be future technology.

Read the complete article here.



Now be sure to share this article with friends, kin and workmates! Fighting the empire starts when you neutralise its shameless lies.


[premium_newsticker id="211406"]


Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

OR you can simply scan our QR code—



 


[/su_spoiler]

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.

 

Creative Commons License
THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License




Do We Really Only Get a Certain Number of Heartbeats in a Lifetime? Here’s What Science Says

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


First iteration on 14 April 2018

"I believe that every human has a finite number of heartbeats," the famous quote goes. "I don't intend to waste any of mine running around doing exercises."

Contrary to what you might have heard, Neil Armstrong never said this. What's more, he disagreed with it. But as much as it's a misattribution, was Armstrong right to argue?

The simplest answer is 'yes'. There is no strict tally for your ticker, keeping track of your pulse until you've used up your allocation of beats. So get out and exercise (after you've finished reading this article, of course).

But there is a more complex answer, one that suggests there is at least some kind of relationship between our heart rate and overall life expectancy.

In 2013, a team of Danish researchers published in the journal BMJ Heart 16 years of work on just under 5,200 men.

Of the roughly 2,800 individuals who provided a decent bank of medical data, just over a third had passed away by the end of the trial from various causes.

Matching the sample's resting heart rates with the rate of mortality led the researchers to believe that higher pulses correlated with a greater chance of dying.

Those with between 71 to 80 beats per minute had a 51 percent greater chance of kicking the bucket during that period than those with a resting rate of under 50 beats. At 81 to 90 beats per minute, that risk was double. Over 90, and it tripled.

Matching the sample's resting heart rates with the rate of mortality led the researchers to believe that higher pulses correlated with a greater chance of dying.

In case you're thinking this was all about fitness or risk of cardiovascular disease, they took those factors into account. Even those who were in otherwise good physical condition seemed to be at risk, so once again, don't use this an excuse to do avoid going for a run.

This sly nod to a relationship between life expectancy and heart rate extends past individual humans – other animals appear to obey a similar ballpark rule.

Check out this website to get some idea of what your pulse is like when compared with, say, a giraffe's.

As we've seen, humans have on average a heart rate of around 60 to 70 beats per minute, give or take. We live roughly 70 or so years, giving us just over 2 billion beats all up.

Chickens have a faster heart rate of about 275 beats per minute, and live only 15 years. On balance, they also have about 2 billion beats.

We seem kind of lucky. A whale has around 20 beats per minute, and lives only slightly longer than us. It gets just under a billion heart beats.

An elephant? Try 30 beats per minute for around 70 years, giving roughly a billion as well.

The poor little skittish hamster has a rapid-fire pulse of 450 beats every minute, squeezed into three short years. That also adds up to a little under a billion.

This rule isn't a hard and fast one, given differences of a few million here and there.

But if we look at it in rough orders of magnitude, there does seem to be a heart-wrenching link between living fast and dying young for all creatures great and small.

This essay is part of a series on cultural, scientific and esoteric matters.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Mike McRae writes for a variety of publications. This piece appeared on ScienceAlert.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License




KULTURALIA: From blood types mysteries to the awesomeness of low-flying planes

Take five. TGP carries a lot of heavy stories—”heaviosity”, as Woody Allen once called it, as its mission is basically to alert you and inform you in depth about the urgent crises afflicting this world and how all of this  could be remedied. But we also need to keep ourselves functional. So check these two items that are simply designd for distraction and light knowledge.


Published on Sep 22, 2018


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

black-horizontal
[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]

Things to ponder

While our media prostitutes, many Hollywood celebs, and politicians and opinion shapers make so much noise about the still to be demonstrated damage done by the Russkies to our nonexistent democracy, this is what the sanctimonious US government has done overseas just since the close of World War 2. And this is what we know about. Many other misdeeds are yet to be revealed or documented.

Parting shot—a word from the editors
The Best Definition of Donald Trump We Have Found

In his zeal to prove to his antagonists in the War Party that he is as bloodthirsty as their champion, Hillary Clinton, and more manly than Barack Obama, Trump seems to have gone “play-crazy” — acting like an unpredictable maniac in order to terrorize the Russians into forcing some kind of dramatic concessions from their Syrian allies, or risk Armageddon.However, the “play-crazy” gambit can only work when the leader is, in real life, a disciplined and intelligent actor, who knows precisely what actual boundaries must not be crossed. That ain’t Donald Trump — a pitifully shallow and ill-disciplined man, emotionally handicapped by obscene privilege and cognitively crippled by white American chauvinism. By pushing Trump into a corner and demanding that he display his most bellicose self, or be ceaselessly mocked as a “puppet” and minion of Russia, a lesser power, the War Party and its media and clandestine services have created a perfect storm of mayhem that may consume us all. Glen Ford, Editor in Chief, Black Agenda Report

[premium_newsticker id=”211406″]