DHS: Russia Will Interfere With U.S. Elections By Promoting Alleged Russian Interference With U.S. Elections

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.


DISPATCHES FROM MOON OF ALABAMA, BY "B"
This article is part of an ongoing series of dispatches from Moon of Alabama



With select comments—

The Hill writes (emphasis added):

Russian media and other groups are intentionally “amplifying” concerns around mail-in voting in order to undermine the 2020 U.S. elections, a report compiled by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) made public Thursday found.
...
Russian state media, proxies, and Russian-controlled social media trolls are likely to promote allegations of corruption, system failure, and foreign malign interference to sow distrust in democratic institutions and election outcomes,” the Office of Intelligence and Analysis wrote.

Do these DHS folks ever look into mirrors?

And what exactly are the Washington Post and New York Times pieces below doing but "to sow distrust in democratic institutions and election outcomes"?

What’s the worst that could happen?
The election will likely spark violence — and a constitutional crisis

What Will You Do if Trump Doesn’t Leave?
Playing out the nightmare scenario.

Those scenarios are the Color Revolutions Coming Home and they are promoted not by Russian media but by the U.S. establishment.

As Whitney Webb writes of the Transition Integrity Project (TIP) war games:

A group of Democratic Party insiders and former Obama and Clinton era officials as well as a cadre of “Never Trump” neoconservative Republicans have spent the past few months conducting simulations and “war games” regarding different 2020 election “doomsday” scenarios.

Per several media reports on the group, called the Transition Integrity Project (TIP), they justify these exercises as specifically preparing for a scenario where President Trump loses the 2020 election and refuses to leave office, potentially resulting in a constitutional crisis. However, according to TIP’s own documents, even their simulations involving a “clear win” for Trump in the upcoming election resulted in a constitutional crisis, as they predicted that the Biden campaign would make bold moves aimed at securing the presidency, regardless of the election result.

This TIP war game (pg 17f) is indeed the plot for a coup:


It is amazing how all this is unfolding in plain sight.

Posted by b on September 4, 2020 at 7:23 UTC | Permalink

 
Comments Sampler

At first those who they wish to destroy, the gods drive mad.
I fear for the world. The Democrats and their supporters have truly taken leave of their senses.
If the U.S.A. is to implode, I hope it doesn’t take down the rest of the world.

Posted by: Beibdnn. | Sep 4 2020 8:22 utc | 1

He who points the finger merely reveals their own prejudices. It doesn't matter which 'side' wins, human beings all over the world will lose because whichever half of the empire party attains victory - whether it be by having more amerikans vote for him or by winning in court, it isn't going to make one iota of difference to Joe/Jo Blow. The ruling class will still be in power screwing 99.999% of us over while laughing up their sleeves.

Posted by: Debsis dead | Sep 4 2020 8:27 utc | 2

There is a clear comparison with a mafia protection racket.
You the American public need our protection from these fictitious outside threats plus you may get ya place trashed by those black folk.
So vote for us or you may regret it !
But don’t forget how that always ends badly. The mafia then own you, take you over, bleed you financially dry, force you to do their criminal activity !
Make a stand now, or roll over.
The US elite are using pure psychological projection —- accusing others of what they have clearly been doing them selves. Interfering in other people’s elections. I won’t list them, we all know that list.
It’s for the American public to stand up against their morally bankrupt leaders. On the streets.

Posted by: Mark2 | Sep 4 2020 9:00 utc | 3

This TIP war game (pg 17f) is indeed the plot for a coup:

It's also the template for the AmeriKKKan Belarus Regime Change fiasco.
i.e. declare an election to be invalid before Election Day.
The only difference is that the US Regime Change plot is in WRITING.

Dumfuckery, much?

Posted by: Hoarsewhisperer | Sep 4 2020 9:34 utc | 5

I don't see the downside of a political collapse and civil war in the Imperialist States. The worse it gets there, the better.

Posted by: Biswapriya Purkayast | Sep 4 2020 9:56 utc | 6

Perhaps the Democrats should have spent the last four years trying to push through the "radically revamped set of democratic rules" rather than dicking around with Russia-gate. But, no, they're morons so they'll wait until after the election to do it.

Posted by: Ghost Ship | Sep 4 2020 10:08 utc | 7

..Beibdnn. @ 1 says: "If the U.S.A. is to implode, I hope it doesn’t take down the rest of the world."
If A, King of the mountain economics will dictate and nation state wars on behalf of its Oligarch constituents will continue. If B, human rights and human dignity will deny winner take all economics and world wars will be reduced to local skirmishes?

Posted by: snake | Sep 4 2020 11:01 utc | 11

The federal budget deficit is projected to hit a record $3.3 trillion as huge government expenditures to fight the coronavirus and to prop up the economy have added more than $2 trillion to the federal ledger, the Congressional Budget Office said.

The spike in the deficit means that federal debt will exceed annual gross domestic product next year — a milestone that would put the U.S. where it was in the aftermath of World War II, when accumulated debt exceeded the size of the economy.

The $3.3 trillion figure released Wednesday is more than triple the 2019 shortfall and more than double the levels experienced after the market meltdown and Great Recession of 2008-09. Government spending, fueled by four coronavirus response measures, would register at $6.6 trillion, $2 trillion-plus more than 2019.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/02/budget-deficit-to-hit-record-3point3-trillion-due-to-virus-recession.html

Posted by: Mao | Sep 4 2020 11:20 utc | 13

There are only 4 goals worth pursuing:
1) Insure your security (to the degree that is possible, because no one is ever "safe")'

4) Get laid as often as possible (prior to 3).

Everything else that is going on is irrelevant. So everyone is predicting riots, civil war and a Constitutional crisis. So what? All that means is that everyone is in agreement that this is what they actually want. Because obviously the whole thing is going to be a self-fulfilling prophecy and at least some people's actual plan.

You all want a war of all against all? OK - that's what I'm fixing to give you.

Posted by: Richard Steven Hack | Sep 4 2020 11:26 utc | 14

"Nah nah nah!! I can't hear you!"

This can only deepen the delusion in America.

Posted by: William Gruff | Sep 4 2020 11:42 utc | 19

Jl @10: "The downside is that China becomes the financial capital and number one economy in the world. Do you really want that?"

Sounds good to me. Where's the problem with it?

Anyway, short of a nuclear attack there is nothing the US can do about China being the #1 economy in the world. Bio attacks have already been tried to economically cripple China but they failed badly, so what's left for the US to try to hold China down?

Posted by: William Gruff | Sep 4 2020 11:50 utc | 20

 

It is amazing how all this is unfolding in plain sight.

It's able to "hide in plain sight" because the present structural contradictions of the USA make it political (in the broad sense of the word, meaning here the struggle for social power) expedient. People are ignoring or agreeing with it because it makes sense socially.

Politics is not a contest to see who's scientifically right - if that was the case, only Ph.D.s would be elected - but the raw struggle for power. The situation of the USA is one of permanent (chronic, structural) decline. In such scenario, there's not enough for everyone anymore. The situation is already polarized - it simply doesn't make any sense logically for any side to accept a victory of the other in what is essentially an arbitrary game (election).

Every historian knows the Republican (the original one being the Roman Republic) system is inherently unstable precisely because of that fact: it tries to solve very serious problems with an infantile game (elections). It naturally brews political polarization and civil war. The civil war is the most perfect manifestation of a republic, its synthesis.

To think that simple communications (i.e. one knowing) does not solve structural contradictions. That would be Habermaisianism, which, as we know, is simply not science, does not correspond to the real world.

Posted by: vk | Sep 4 2020 11:59 utc | 21

I'll repeat what I said in a previous thread :

The "colored revolution" idea is currently irrelevant. There is no foreign power playing the deus ex machina.

There is only one entity which theorically could plan a colored revolution in order to grasp power. It is well known, it's the imperial deep state (heads of the military/intelligence apparatus).

But it already owns the top power. It doesn't obey Trump. It controls him. Such colored revolution would be useless.

What we are seeing here is nothing more than words coming from mainstream media about an hypothetical scenario (contested election results) which happens to be just one of the steps of any classical colored revolution. This is not an actual colored revolution in the making.

These are pre-election games. Maybe the deep state is preemptively accusing the KamalaHarris/Clinton/Israel side to plan to disturb the beginning of the second Trump/deepState presidency.

Posted by: Parisian Guy | Sep 4 2020 11:59 utc | 22

Mao @13: "The spike in the deficit means that federal debt will exceed annual gross domestic product next year — a milestone that would put the U.S. where it was in the aftermath of World War II, when accumulated debt exceeded the size of the economy."

A crucial difference between then and now is that now there is no potential for an extended period of massive economic growth to diminish the scale of that debt. The entire world, less the Soviet Union, was America's marketplace for it enormous industrial capacity back after WWII, but today not only are those markets mostly saturated but America no longer has much of an industrial capacity anyway.

Short version: The USA cannot grow its way out of debt this time. Treasuries will suffer from that.

Posted by: William Gruff | Sep 4 2020 12:00 utc | 23

There will not be a civil war, because 99% of USA inhabitants don't want civil war. Medias and Internet are deceptive. They put the focus on the remaining 1%. 

Posted by: Parisian Guy | Sep 4 2020 12:07 utc | 24


Patrick Lawrence: Voting in a De-Facto Military State

Between Biden and Trump, U.S. voters have no alternative to our anxious empire’s lawless conduct abroad.

John Pilger @johnpilger

In Shanghai, the writer Eric Li told me: "In China, the governing party never changes, but policies do. In the US, the governing party changes, but policies don't." Trump or Biden, the November 3 election in America is the antithesis of democracy.

https://twitter.com/johnpilger/status/1301499723413676033

Posted by: Mao | Sep 4 2020 12:16 utc | 26

The US has imposed sanctions on senior officials in the International Criminal Court (ICC), including chief prosecutor Fatou Bensouda.  Secretary of State Mike Pompeo accused the court of "illegitimate attempts to subject Americans to its jurisdiction".

The Hague-based ICC is currently investigating whether US forces committed war crimes in Afghanistan.  The US has criticised the court since its foundation and is one of a dozen states which have not signed up.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54003527

Posted by: Mao | Sep 4 2020 12:25 utc | 27

Kudos to Russian government, military and other intelligence folks, and not the least, Vladimir Putin.  They had enough foresight in early 2000 to see downfall of US cancer, and they prioritized development of new weapons.

It is only this clear technological advantage of Russian nuclear and strategic weapons that will prevent nuclear holocaust US will be tempted to start during its demise.

Posted by: Abe | Sep 4 2020 12:27 utc | 28

"Russian media and other groups are intentionally “amplifying” concerns around mail-in voting in order to undermine the 2020 U.S. elections"

So when Trump raises concerns over mail-in voting and the likelihood (scratch that, make it: 1000% guarantee) of the DNC (scratch that, make it: thoroughly corrupt DNC) using mail-in voting as a method of cheating then the headlines will read some variation of (you can think of some):

Trump echoes Russian concern over mail-in voting
Trump promotes Russian propaganda about mail-in voting
Trump and Russians on same page about mail-in voting

---

This Green Voter (me) is going to love-and-hate voting for Trump
this time around.

The Democrats (and the media) aided and abetted the intelligence agencies' treasonous coup attempt - Russiagate.  There *****has****** to be a price for such treachery. The Democrats earned my vote for Trump.  It pains me to do it, but ongoing actions by the Democrats keeps egging me on to follow thru and vote for Trump.

Posted by: librul | Sep 4 2020 12:52 utc | 30

Eric X. Li: A tale of two political systems
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0YjL9rZyR0

Democracy is Failing | Eric X Li | Oxford Union
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kqwMKyBvLc

New World Disorder | Erix X. Li | Oxford Union
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVyHAQh2VTE

Posted by: Mao | Sep 4 2020 12:53 utc | 31

@ Posted by: Mao | Sep 4 2020 12:16 utc | 26

The CCP is not a party in the Western sense of the word. The comparison made by your friend is absurd.

Posted by: vk | Sep 4 2020 13:02 utc | 32

Top French Intel Boss Reveals Operation Beluga: US UK Plot to Discredit Putin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18tW6iza1x8

Novichok, Navalny, Nordstream, Nonsense
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/09/novichok-navalny-nordstream-nonsense/

Posted by: Mao | Sep 4 2020 13:14 utc | 33

In an op-ed published on Thursday in the New York Times, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz and his Roosevelt Institute colleague Kitty Richards argue that rather than wait for Congress to provide financial aid to deal with the economic consequences of the coronavirus pandemic, state and local governments should increase taxes on "their wealthiest residents" to "bolster their local economies" and meet pressing needs or else Americans will be forced to suffer an "unacceptable alternative" characterized by socially-damaging austerity and a long-lasting recession.

Richards and Stiglitz make the case that "the economic impact of the pandemic is daunting, and it would be better for the federal government to step in." According to the pair of economists, the federal government—unencumbered by balanced budget rules hampering many states—"could solve the problem tomorrow by providing fiscal relief to states and localities, like the $1 trillion provided by the HEROES Act that passed the House in May" before languishing on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) desk.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/09/03/either-raise-taxes-wealthy-fund-recovery-or-expect-years-grinding-recession-argues

Posted by: Mao | Sep 4 2020 13:19 utc | 34

vk @32: "The CCP is not a party in the Western sense of the word."

True, in the simplest terms it is a "mass-based organization". Britain's Labor Party had some loose similarities back before they got Blaired and purged. I cannot think of any one word labels that describe what it is, though, and a proper description would be too long for a Twitter post. At least "party" is something that westerners can relate to.

Posted by: William Gruff | Sep 4 2020 13:23 utc | 35

DHS is currently headed by a 44 year old former lobbyist and good old boy. He cannot possibly have a clue what his 240,000 staffers are up to. Meaning that army is available for other work.

Trump has entirely neglected to take charge of the federal bureaucracy. Draw any conclusion. It is a madhouse, normal rules or analyses do not apply.

Posted by: oldhippie | Sep 4 2020 13:26 utc | 36 

 


[premium_newsticker id="213661"]


 


About the author(s)

"b" is Moon of Alabama's founding (and chief) editor.  This site's purpose is to discuss politics, economics, philosophy and blogger Billmon's Whiskey Bar writings. Moon Of Alabama was opened as an independent, open forum for members of the Whiskey Bar community.  Bernhard )"b") started and still runs the site. Once in a while you will also find posts and art from regular commentators. You can reach the current administrator of this site by emailing Bernhard at MoonofA@aol.com

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
 ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS

black-horizontal




German ‘Novichok poisoning’ claims over Navalny will prompt familiar circus of sanctions & Russia demonisation. But who benefits?

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



George Galloway • RT.com
ANNOTATIONS & SIDEBARS BY PATRICE GREANVILLE


Russian opposition politician Alexei Navalny in one of his many rabble-rousing appearances. He is described by Western media as an "opposition "leader" but has never commanded more than 2% of the vote. His ties to the CIA are a matter of public record. In reality Navalny is far more likely to be a color revolution asset in Washington's ongoing hybrid war against Russia.

The bizarre events surrounding Alexey Navalny, who lies stricken in a coma in Berlin, will bring forth more Cold War-style calls to isolate Russia, at the cost of further consolidating relations between Moscow and Beijing.

Ever since the man – always wrongly billed as “the Russian Opposition leader,” when in fact he polls 2% of the vote, and the actual opposition leader is a Communist who still has mass support – took ill on a flight from Siberia to Moscow, the securocratic lobby in western countries has been primed.

Today, with the statement from the German government that Navalny is yet another victim of ‘Novichok’-class chemical agents, active measures are already underway.

Former British intelligence officer Philip Ingram MBE, whom I interviewed today for my Sputnik TV show, had to hurry me up because “the Germans have just spoken the word Novichok and I expect to be busy with other interviews.”

 

 

If the Russian state had attempted to assassinate Navalny, they would never have allowed his stricken comatose body to be flown out of the country to Germany in the first place. He would have died on the operating table in Russia, where nobody could “detect traces of Novichok” in a NATO capital.

If the Russian state was responsible for trying to kill Navalny, surely the LAST weapon in the whole world it would have chosen with which to do so would be Novichok?

A butter knife, a gun, a speeding car, a car crash – any one of a hundred methods would surely have been preferable in the post-Skripal era. And more reliable, it would appear: Navalny, for now mercifully, is the THIRD Russian in a row to be attacked by a DEADLY “military-grade nerve agent” and mysteriously fail to die.

But just like with the Skripals, we come up against the question asked in every murder mystery: Cui Bono? Who benefits?

What conceivable gain would the Kremlin stand to make in the killing by Novichok of Alexey Navalny?

And the huge contradiction, the biggest of all, is that the West wants us to believe Vladimir Putin is at one and the same time a dazzling Mephistopheles capable of arranging elections in America and Britain, fixing Brexit, and fomenting separatism from Scotland to Spain, whilst at the same time being a blithering, self-harming idiot. The cop that couldn’t shoot straight. The man who brought the whole western world down on his head through not one, but two failed attempts to dispose of utterly harmless marginal critics – who, in the case of Alexey Navalny, would be incapable of winning a single seat in a provincial local authority. 

S I D E B A R
Commentary by Patrice Greanville
The big guns of US media eagerly join in. EVERYTHING you hear in this clip is a complete lie, a masterpiece of innuendo, but par for the course in the life of US journos, whose actual task, as leading members of the American hybrid warfare machinery, is above all to carry the US state dept. line. The fact the German government is supporting the lie does not make it true as we know by now how EU vassals, especially London and Berlin, abjectly close ranks with Washington when it comes to anti-Russian psyops.—PG

BELOW: Clip by CBS Evening News, 22 Aug 2020. 

And here's one by Reuters, one of the biggest world press services, on the same topic:

I’m travelling at the moment, filming my forthcoming documentary on the strange death of Dr David Kelly – the British weapons inspector caught up in the Blair War on Iraq – who was found stone dead at the height of the publicity surrounding him. So I don’t have my crystal ball to consult. But I nonetheless predict that what will now happen will be the familiar circus of diplomatic expulsions, sanctions and ostracism. Further demonisation of Russia. Tit for tat. As the world faces a deadly pandemic and economic collapse. Just what the doctor ordered...

'Trust in news and current affairs has never been more important, and RT's failures to preserve due impartiality were serious and repeated.' —Ofcom mouthpiece (Newspeak dept.)

RELATED: Watch how the putrid British establishment (in reality an anglo-american Borg) persecutes RT.com and George Galloway. Not content with the Assange judicial infamy, they are now levying huge fines on RT.com in an effort to bankrupt the channel and finally shut it down, while pretending that free speech is sill alive and well in the kingdom. Please examine closely this dispatch by the British MAIL ONLINE, offshoot of The Daily Mail.—P. Greanville


George Galloway's RT news channel loses High Court challenge over £200,000 fine for biased coverage of novichok poisonings and Syria

  • Russian state news channel RT has lost London High Court challenge over fine
  • Ofcom found it had failed to meet requirement to present news impartially
  • Sanctioned broadcasts include two editions of Sputnik hosted by ex-MP George Galloway covering the novichok poisonings in Salisbury
  • Kremlin-backed RT says that it intends to appeal today's High Court judgment 
 Russian state news broadcaster RT has lost a London High Court challenge over a £200,000 fine for 'serious and repeated' breaches of impartiality rules over broadcasts on the Salisbury poisoning and the war in Syria.

Ofcom, the UK's broadcasting watchdog, sanctioned the Kremlin-backed channel over seven news and current affairs programmes between March 17 and April 26, 2018 which failed the requirement for news to be presented with 'due impartiality'. 

Two of the sanctioned broadcasts were editions of Sputnik presented by former MP George Galloway which covered the poisoning of Russian ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury, Wiltshire, in March 2018.

Ofcom also found that four news broadcasts addressing US involvement in the Syrian conflict, and a programme concerning the Ukrainian Government's position on Nazism and the treatment of Roma gypsies, breached impartiality rules.

RT challenged Ofcom's decision, arguing that it breached its right to freedom of expression, and that the official watchdog failed to take account of the 'dominant media narrative' in relation to the Salisbury poisoning. 

Alleged novichok poisoners Ruslan Boshirov (left) and Alexander Petrov (right), accused by UK authorities of attempting a hit on former GRU officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia

Alleged novichok poisoners Ruslan Boshirov (left) and Alexander Petrov (right), accused by UK authorities of attempting a hit on former GRU officer Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia

However, Lord Justice Dingemans - sitting with Dame Victoria Sharp, the president of the Queen's Bench Division - today dismissed RT's claim.   

The judge said RT's 'concept of a dominant media narrative is a nebulous one', which would make it 'difficult, if not impossible, for broadcasters to discern in advance precisely what the dominant media narrative was, and what could be broadcast'.

He added: 'RT's submission that the dominant media narrative reduces the harm from the broadcasts in my judgment misses the point about the importance of the viewers who are not aware of the other viewpoint.'

The judge also rejected RT's contention that the 'due impartiality' requirement in news broadcasts interfered with its right to freedom of expression.

He said the requirement was necessary because 'at present, the broadcast media maintains a reach and immediacy that remains unrivalled by other media'. British politicians including Alex Salmond (left) and Nigel Farage (right) have appeared on RT

By the book. Following US practice to delegitimate dissident sources of news, Daily Mail attaches this warning to this image: "RT receives funding from the Russian state (pictured, President Vladimir Putin)".

Justice Dingemans state: 'There is reason to consider that the need is at least as great, if not greater than ever before, given current concerns about the effect on the democratic process of news manipulation and of fake news.'

Ofcom v Russia: another battlefield in the New Cold War 

Relations between Moscow and Western powers first soured after the former's war with Georgia in 2008, backing separatists in the tiny Caucasian state.

Russia annexed Crimea and helped fuel Ukraine's bloody civil war, which began after the toppling of the pro-Moscow regime in 2014. (By the US, of course, with help from Germany and NATO. Not mentioned, of course. And Crime freely voted itself back into the Russian Federation.—Ed)

Moscow has found itself at loggerheads with the US, Britain, and France in Syria, where it has backed Bashar al-Assad and Iran since 2015. (No mention of the West's criminal meddling in Syria nor their support for the barbaric ISIS/A Qaeda fanatics they claim to be fighting.—Ed)

Vladimir Putin has lamented the collapse of the USSR, and accused NATO of provocation since the end of the Cold War in 1989-91. (What is NOT true about that?—Ed)

The judge said 'where viewers access news on media which is not the subject of a requirement of "due impartiality", they may receive only one viewpoint to the exclusion of other viewpoints'.

'In such circumstances a viewer may interact only with one viewpoint, and the media accessed by that viewer may become 'an echo chamber' or 'information silo' for that single viewpoint,' Justice Dingemans added. 

He concluded RT were not restricted from broadcasting the material they wished to broadcast on the Salisbury poisoning, the war in Syria, or on events in Ukraine.

'The only requirement was that, in the programme as broadcast, RT provided balance to ensure that there was "due impartiality",' he said. 

Ofcom said it welcomes today's judgments that its investigation and decisions were 'fair and proportionate'. (Ha ha ha haha !  —Ed)

A spokesperson added: 'Trust in news and current affairs has never been more important, and RT's failures to preserve due impartiality were serious and repeated.' 

RT said: 'We are aware of the court's decision, and we intend to appeal.'

The broadcaster previously warned British media working in Russia to get 'ready to face the consequences' after it was fined £200,000 last year.

British politicians including Jeremy Corbyn, Alex Salmond, and Nigel Farage have appeared on RT, which receives money from the Russian Government.

The PM's father Stanley Johnson has also appeared on the news channel, and several Tory MPs including the former Brexit minister Steve Baker. 

O Yes. Having created a huge buzzword  to accuse Russia of international criminality, precisely what the US alliance is guilty of, the shameless Western media machinery is at it again, capitalizing on their previously created Skripal tsunami of BS. (Art by George Burchett © 2020.)

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT. Hey, but they DO represent the views of The Greanville Post. 


 

George Galloway
George Galloway was a member of the British Parliament for nearly 30 years. He presents TV and radio shows (including on RT). He is a film-maker, writer and a renowned orator. Follow him on Twitter @georgegalloway

 

[post-views]


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License



Do people get the government they deserve? 


• remember: ALL CAPTIONS, IMAGES, PULL QUOTES AND ANNOTATIONS BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHOR—


Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

Covid-19 has put this site on ventilators.
DONATIONS HAVE DRIED UP… 
PLEASE send what you can today!
JUST USE THE BUTTON BELOW

OR you can simply scan our QR code—



 

 

 




THIS WEEK IN CHINA: The Trade War with China, China-Russia Abandon the Dollar, and much more

HELP ENLIGHTEN YOUR FELLOWS. BE SURE TO PASS THIS ON. BREAKING THE EMPIRE'S DISINFORMATION MACHINE IS UP TO YOU.


Special Dispatches by Godfree Roberts


THIS WEEK IN CHINA # 0001 (DATELINE: 8 Aug 2020)

Gleanings from the Middle Kingdom


The size of China’s displacement of the world balance is such that the world must find a new balance. It is not possible to pretend that this is just another big player. This is the biggest player in the history of the world.  – Lee Kwan Yew.

THE ECONOMY

Factory activity expanded in July for the fifth month in a row and at a faster pace, beating analyst expectations. The official manufacturing Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) rose to 51.1 in July from June's 50.9, the highest reading since March. Analysts had expected it to slow to 50.7.[MORE]

In a series of deals worth hundreds of billions, PipeChina recently acquired infrastructure assets from China’s three largest energy companies. Central state ownership of the nation's vast pipeline network, liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals and oil storage facilities will  make it easier for smaller players to enter the energy sector and keep costs down.[MORE]

Tesla is advertising for another 1,000 Chinese factory workers and designers to join its studio as production ramps up. Q2 China revenues climbed 103% YoY to $1.4 billion, which means China generates 23% of Tesla’s total revenues compared to 11% last year.[MORE]

The world's biggest liquor company, Kweichow Moutai, said net income rose 13% in H1 2020. Earnings for the first six months were $3.2 billion and revenue jumped 11%. [MORE]

Tencent is now bigger than Facebook. After adding around $200 billion to its value this year,  Tencent shares rallied around 43% year-to-date (compared to 12% for Facebook), adding $198 billion to Tencent’s value. [MORE]

TRADE WAR

pastedGraphic_1.png

As the chart above shows, China's membership in the WTO did not affect its manufacturing decline. [Cato Institute]

Moody’s says the trade war cost the U.S. economy 300,000 jobs and 0.3% of GDP. Bloomberg says it will cost $316 billion this year, while the New York Fed found that US companies's stocks lost $1.7 trillion as a result of the tariffs. Companies paid $46 billion in tariffs, forcing them to accept lower profit margins, cut wages and jobs, defer potential wage hikes or expansions, and raise prices for American consumers or companies and “farmers have lost the vast majority of what was once a $24 billion market in China”. The US goods trade deficit with China reached a record $419.2 billion. [MORE]

Russia more than doubled its meat exports in the first six months this year and China became the largest buyer of Russian meat, accounting for 45 percent of shipments.  [MORE]

Russia and China are rapidly abandoning the US dollar. Four years ago the greenback accounted for over 90 percent of their currency settlements. In Q1 2020, the dollar’s share of their trade fell below 50 percent for the first time. [MORE]

COVID CORNER

A Chinese COVID-19 vaccine candidate is effective against all detected strains of the virus so far, with lower chance and degree of adverse reactions than same-typed vaccine candidates under research."The inactivated vaccine we developed can cover all strains of the coronavirus that have been detected so far, including the virus strains tracked in the Xinfadi market in Beijing". [MORE]

pastedGraphic_2.png

COLD WAR

A new Harvard study revealing that Chinese citizens’ satisfaction with their government has increased since 2003: “There is little evidence to support the idea that [the Communist Party] is losing legitimacy in the eyes of its people … By 2016, the Chinese government was more popular than at any point during the previous two decades. As such, there was no real sign of burgeoning discontent among China’s main demographic groups, casting doubt on the idea that the country was facing a crisis of political legitimacy.” Just as interesting is the fact that it has received little media attention: how could an evil authoritarian regime attract such widespread support from people across China? –David Dodwell. [MORE]

Harvard professor Charles Lieber, accused of lying about China ties, faces new charges. Lieber, 61, was charged in June with lying to US Defence Department investigators about his relationship with WUT and for lying to Harvard about those connections, leading the university to share that false information with the US National Institutes of Health.[MORE]

The People’s Bank of China says the country should switch from SWIFT to a domestic financial network and drop the greenback as the anchor currency for its foreign exchange controls. It also recommended developing legislation similar to the European Union’s Blocking Statute, which allowed the EU to sustain trade and economic relations with Iran despite US sanctions.[MORE]

BELT AND ROAD

The China-Iran deal will change the balance of power in the Middle East. The manufacturing products created by utilizing cheap Iranian resources will be used to crack the western markets through the China-Iran axis along with unrestricted access to Iranian military bases. China will invest US $280 billion in expanding Iran’s oil, gas, and petrochemicals sectors, to be front-loaded into the first five-year period. Another US $120 billion will upgrade Iran’s transport and manufacturing infrastructure, this amount will increase in each subsequent period. Chinese companies will bid on any stalled or uncompleted oil, gas, and petrochemicals projects in Iran. China is granted the offer to buy oil, gas, and petchems products at a minimum discount of 12 per cent to cover risk premia and volume discounts. “Provided ALL goes as planned, Sino-Russian bombers, fighters, and transport planes will have unrestricted access to Iranian air bases” at Hamedan, Bandar Abbas, Chabhar, and Abadan. [MORE]

HUAWEI

Great video explaining the dirty tricks behind the Meng case: https://youtu.be/SVhLvS9lCNs

Huawei is considering all possible options against HSBC for allegedly presenting “misleading evidence” that resulted in the arrest of its chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, in Canada. The tech giant has hired five law firms in an all-out effort to free Meng Wanzhou.[MORE]

Cynthia Chung: “HSBC has a lot to lose if its relationship to the Chinese government falters. In 2017, the first joint venture securities company majority owned by a foreign bank, HSBC Qianhai Securities Limited, was formally opened for business in China. Though this was a great achievement by HSBC, its foreign majority ownership is a mere 51%, which could be easily taken away if they were considered at any point to be unfit for that level of responsibility.  Recently, HSBC also carried out the first transaction in yuan-denominated blockchain letters of credit. HSBC’s position at the forefront of facilitating blockchain trade in the yuan promises a way into a major market, with China-related trade producing an estimated 1.2 million letters of credit worth $750 billion last year”. [MORE]

ENVIRONMENT

The Yellow River is the clearest it’s been in 500 years, scientists say. A study found there has been a sharp reduction in run-off and sediment in recent decades that is unprecedented over the past five centuries. The change is a result of tree planting, less rainfall in the region and human activities like irrigation and tree-planting that use a lot of water. [MORE]

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

The annual ranking of articles published in peer-reviewed science journals worldwide is now available from Scimago. Chinese scientists are widening their lead over US scientists every year, as we would expect, since the PRC invests four times more money in R&D than the US. Frans Vandenbosch kindly distilled it into this chart: [MORE] 

pastedGraphic_3.png

China holds the most quantum computing patents, far more than the US Japan, or the UK says Chii Dong Chen, physics researcher at Taiwan's Academia Sinica. The US congress in December 2018 passed the National Quantum Initiative, planning to spend US$1.2 billion in five years to establish an office to organize quantum computing research. [MORE]

After a month in orbit, BeiDou passed its final test by locating a plane in flight while tracking and monitoring an air terminal. By the end of 2023, all civil aviation aircraft will have BeiDou-based positioning and tracking capabilities. Myanmar's Ministry of Fisheries has purchased 1,000 BeiDou shipboard terminals for vessel position information and tracking and 137 countries have signed cooperation agreements with BeiDou.100% of BeiDou's core components are made in China.[MORE]

Doctors have used gene editing to treat patients with thalassemia, the first time the technique has been successfully implemented in the country. Medical scientists at Central South University said those receiving the treatment had gone 87 days without blood transfusions.[MORE]

DEFENSE

CNBC reports that China is testing electronic warfare assets at fortified outposts in the South China Sea. The move allows Beijing to further project its power in the hotly disputed waters. [MORE]. China News reports that several US Growler electronic warplanes went out of control for a few second over the South China Sea then withdrew. According to the pilots, their instruments  became chaotic and the planes could not communicate with the outside world. The United States demanded that China dismantle the electronic equipment immediately, but was ignored.[MORE]

Admiral Philip Davidson's Senate testimony:

  1. “China is pursuing advanced capabilities like hypersonic missiles which the United States has no defense against. As China pursues these advanced weapons systems, US forces across the Indo-Pacific will be placed increasingly at risk.”
  2. “China is now capable of controlling the South China Sea in all scenarios short of war with the United States.”
  3. “China is undermining the rules-based international order.” [MORE]

A new RAND Corporation report explores four scenarios of what extended competition between the United States and China might entail through the year 2050:

  1. triumphant China: Beijing succeeds in realizing its grand strategy
  2. ascendant China, in which Beijing achieves many, but not all, of its goals
  3. stagnant China, in which Beijing has failed to achieve its long-term goals
  4. imploding China,  besieged by problems that threaten the communist regime's existence

 The report concludes that a triumphant China is the least likely. [MORE] 

Next year, ASEAN and China celebrate 30 years of bilateral relations and may upgrade it to form a 'comprehensive strategic partnership'. If they can all agree on a South China Sea Code Of Conduct by the end of 2020 it would invalidate US pretensions to secure “freedom of navigation” in an area where navigation is already free.[Pepe Escobar]

COLD WAR

Australia Tells US It Has No Intention of Injuring Important China Ties [MORE]

“Australia has made a principled call for an independent review of the COVID-19 outbreak, an unprecedented global crisis with severe health, economic and social impacts," said Foreign Minister Marise Payne. Australia was pushing for an investigation into China, not factual information about Covid-19.

Australia plans to set up US-funded military fuel reserve (in America!) amid China tensions [MORE]

The Royal Australian Navy guided-missile frigate HMAS Parramatta (FFH 154) is underway with the US Navy amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6),the Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Bunker Hill (CG 52) and the Arleigh-Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Barry (DDG 52) in the South China Sea. 

Australia rejects China’s assertion that its sovereignty claims over the Paracel and Spratly Islands are ‘widely recognised by the international community’.Australia is making clear that it does not recognise the claims of China or any other states to these islands and that they remain a matter of dispute. In this respect, there has been no change to Australia’s longstanding position on the disputed status of the islands. [MORE]

Australia Pours Money Into Insane US War Games Yet Won’t Support Its Own Citizens. Australian government slashes pandemic payments to workers after suspending parliament.  "Australia is not a real country, and it doesn’t have a real government," writes Aussie Caitlin Johnstone. "It is functionally nothing more than a U.S. military/intelligence asset. Despite a worsening COVID-19 surge in Australia’s two most populous states, the Liberal-National government yesterday announced the slashing of its pandemic wage subsidies and welfare benefits, as part of its drive to ‘reopen the economy.’" [MORE]

New Zealand Ramps Up Military Spending To Align With US and Australia Against China. New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s government, a coalition between Labour, the Greens and the right-wing nationalist NZ First Party, is committed to spending $20 billion on military upgrades.[MORE]

Australian Bureau of Statistics data shows that Chinese investment accounts for 2.0 percent of foreign investment in Australia: US: 25.6 percent; UK: 17.8 percent;  Belgium: 9.1 percent; Japan: 6.3 percent; Hong Kong: 3.7 percent; Singapore: 2.6 percent; The Netherlands: 2.3 percent; Luxembourg: 2.2 percent.

The European Union agreed to restrict the export of equipment used for suppression and surveillance to Hong Kong. The European Council stated that it expressed serious concerns about the “Hong Kong National Security Law”, stating that the law has severely eroded the rights and freedoms that Hong Kong should be protected until at least 2047. German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas stated that it is reasonable to treat Hong Kong on the same basis as mainland China when exporting equipment for repression after the Hong Kong National Security Law takes effect.[MORE]. Review Hong Kong's 1997 Treason Ordinance here: [MORE]

“Canada, Australia and the UK have unilaterally suspended the agreements on surrender of fugitive offenders (SFO) with the HKSAR using the enactment of the National Security Law in Hong Kong as an excuse, which smacks of political manipulation and double standards. The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) Government has reciprocated.[MORE]

The International Air Transport Association objects to testing aircrew for Covid-19 as it predicts industry will not recover until 2024. New rules make it compulsory for pilots and cabin crew to have negative result before they can fly to Hong Kong. The IATA does not support the move, though evidence suggests that the latest surge came from imported cases.[MORE]

LONG READ

The Truth About Social Credit

The most authoritative Government release on Social Credit in some time is available for public comment through August 20th., and seeks to clarify critical concepts and concerns in building China’s Social Credit System such as

  1. What data can be collected or used as ‘Credit Information’?
  2. When information can be shared or made public and how?
  3. What penalties are allowed, and what procedures are to be used?
  4. How negative ‘credit’ can be restored?

The overall goal is to make sure that the system is part of the legal system, not something beyond it or parallel to it.

The backstory.

If you aren’t living in or studying China, you may well believe that the Social Credit System is an algorithmic reputation scoring mechanism based on “real-time monitoring through big data tools” to generate a score “controlling virtually every facet of human life” that “dictates one’s place in society“. The reality is both more complicated and far less exciting.

People would likely have a more accurate understanding of the system if China had said they were crafting a “Law on the Collection and Use of Administrative and Regulatory Data” instead of a ‘social credit system’. The ‘social credit’ name isn’t only evocative in English but also reflects the misguided attempt to include diverse topics such as financial credit reporting, administrative regulation, and public morality propaganda under the same project name, even though these pieces remained fairly discrete in practice.

It’s probably safe to say that the primary function of ‘social credit’ is one of administrative regulation, operating through industry-specific blacklists. Regulatory agencies were all tasked with generating rules for what violations of the laws under their authority would justify blacklisting. Blacklisting is important, not only because it creates a negative public record, but also because various agencies have signed inter-agency MOUs to take limited enforcement action against those blacklisted by another agency. Blacklisting by the food and drug administration, then, might result in consequences when applying for permits from an unrelated agency. This tool lets you explore the full range of cross-departmental punishments under this system.

Updating the Blacklists.

The new draft rules revisit the drafting of industry blacklisting standards and procedures to require both a serious violation of law AND:

  1. A threat to health or safety,
  2. disruption of the marketplace,
  3. violations of judicial or administrative orders, OR
  4. refusals to perform national defense duties.

The third category is about increasing the enforceability of court judgments and refers to the court system’s blacklist for ‘judgment defaulters’- those who have an active judgment against them and the ability to satisfy that judgment, but who refuse to do so. This one blacklist is overwhelmingly driving most of the exotic penalties connected with social credit, such as the no fly list and limits on spending. Interestingly, it is described as necessary to increase the ‘credibility’ of the courts.

The new draft rules also require that industry blacklisting standards now include express mechanisms for being removed from the list or correcting information. More importantly, the standards must be released for a period of at least 30 days for public commenting before they are enacted, and their implementation must be periodically evaluated by a third party after enactment.

Blacklisting Procedures

Before being blacklisted, parties must be given notice of the reason and the legal basis and have a chance to object. If blacklisted, they must be given a clear written decision indicating the reasons, rules for removal, and so forth. Blacklisting decisions should generally not be made below the county-level and are reviewed at the provincial level.

Punishments

All credit punishments must be listed in a national catalog of penalties drafted in conjunction with experts and other concerned parties. The draft rules make clear that punishments methods cannot require 3rd parties like banks and businesses to take action against blacklistees.

An explicit legal basis must be provided for all possible punishments.

This has actually been done in the past for inter-agency punishments authorized in cross-departmental MOUs mentioned above, although some have found that the scope of the cited authority may have been exceeded. Generally, however, the need for a legal basis has already limited cross-departmental action to areas where an agency has discretion to consider a broad range of factors- such as in permitting and licensing, with punishments generally been limited to:

  1. Higher scrutiny or restrictions in authorizing necessary permits, credentials, or approvals,
  2. Higher scrutiny or restrictions on participation in government contract bidding or authorization of use of government resources,
  3. Restrictions on receiving/ revocation of awards and honors.
  4. Increased routine regulatory oversight
  5. limits on receiving government benefits.

One of the greatest fears about the social credit system is that the ‘credit consequences’ for a violation could become a way of covertly increasing the violations’ statutory penalty. Meaning that since ‘untrustworthy conduct’ refers to violations of laws and legal obligations, there shouldn’t be any collateral consequences that increase the punishment beyond what the relevant law authorizes. A parallel might be the lasting impact of a criminal record long after a sentence has been served.

The new rules are at pains to say that this can’t be tolerated. There must be a legal basis for penalties and that if the law doesn’t allow for sufficient penalties, the correct approach is to lobby to amend the law, not use social credit, not only requiring a legal basis for penalties but also adding that if the law doesn’t allow for sufficient penalties, the correct approach is to lobby to amend the law, not use social credit.

Credit Information

A global concern today is the collection of personal information and the new rules attempt to regulate what information should be collected and used as ‘credit information’. The inclusion of ‘Public Credit Information’-the information collected or generated by government agencies in the course of their duties- in social credit is to be limited to the types of information in a national uniform catalog created by the inter-agency committee for establishing social credit with the input of legal experts, scholars, affected businesses, industry associations, and others. Local public credit information catalogs have been available for some time, but a national catalog will limit local discretion and help standardize the system.

The purpose of collecting or using information is also required to be indicated- and consent must be given for the collection of information that isn’t authorized by law. To try and ensure that consent is voluntarily given, the rules say that it must not be coerced or gamed through methods like demanding blanket consent. This follows recent moves on privacy in the commercial sector.

If something is to be considered negative credit information- it must be based on judicial rulings, arbitration documents, administrative decisions and rulings, or other effective legal documents. Again, social credit is concerned with recording and publicizing violations of laws and legal obligations.

Conclusion

The draft rules are open for public comment until August. As written, they would require that industry blacklist and social credit rules comply with them by the end of 2021 or be invalidated. Much of what they say is positive, but not groundbreaking in that they largely restate principles that were always in place or were emerging in practice over the past several years. Moreover, the draft, like much national level authority is quite vague, leaving room for future problems. The required national catalog of public credit information or punishment lists, for example, are yet to be seen, nor are specific mechanisms and procedures for credit restoration and corrections. The requirements that all standards and rules for punishments be made public may ultimately be among the most concrete improvements- allowing monitoring and analysis of the systems’ evolution.

Most critically, the main purpose of the draft is to harmonize social credit with China’s existing legal system, and while ‘legality’ should be a minimum requirement, it is no panacea. Many laws creating obligations or prohibiting conduct in China are unclear or easily abused. Others, that criminalize speech such as mockery of the national anthem are simply unjust. Limiting social credit to the enforcement of such laws, can’t improve those underlying laws. Sponsor a translation at the wonderful China Law Translate. [HERE]


China has the best judicial system in the world because the sine qua non for a good judicial system is trust and people trust their legal system because it applies the law uniformly to rich and poor, powerful and powerless, alike.

If people do not trust their judicial system it has failed, and China’s judicial system is the most trusted on earth.

How do China and America compare? How much do citizens trust their respective legal systems?

When he launched his anti-corruption drive in 2012, President Xi promised⁠1 to govern by virtuous example, yide zhiguo, and to create a socialist spiritual civilization, jingshen wenming. Four years later, reminded⁠2 a judicial study group that law and ethics are inextricably bound:

Law is virtue expressed in words and virtue is law borne in people's hearts. In the eyes of the State, law and virtue have equal status in regulating social behavior, adjusting social relations and maintaining social order. Rule of law must embody moral ideals that provide reliable institutional support for virtue. Laws and regulations should promote virtuous behavior while socialist core values–prosperity, democracy, civility, harmony, freedom, equality, justice, the rule of law, patriotism, dedication, integrity and friendliness–should be woven into legislation, law enforcement, and the judicial process.

Penal law and judicial processes still play minor roles in Chinese everyday life and the legal process remains a work in process. Members of the National Family⁠ 3 still address older strangers as ‘aunty,’ ‘uncle,’ ‘grandfather,’ or ‘grandmother,’ and every adult assumes responsibility for every child. Would-be criminals struggle against family, friends, workmates, classmates, and neighbors who counsel, mediate and compromise⁠4 with them to keep them on the path of virtue. They encourage self-criticism and use persuasion, education, and individually tailored solutions, which families can enforce far more effectively than police. So effective is mediation that Congress now requires all villages to maintain People’s Mediation Committees⁠5, courthouses to maintain mediation offices, and lawyers to become certified mediators. In 2019, seven-million mediators handled six million disputes and reduced the national legal bill to one-tenth of America’s⁠6.

As in France, magistrates are regarded as neutral truth seekers who interrogate suspects, examine evidence, hear testimony, render verdicts and determine guilt and innocence pre-trial. Though a Trial Spot in wealthy Shanghai provides defense lawyers for all criminal defendants, elsewhere defense lawyers are mandatory only for juveniles, the disabled, and those facing life imprisonment or death. If there is insufficient evidence for a conviction, the magistrate will suggest that the procurate either reduce the charges or investigate further. Since most casework involves paper depositions, the Western custom of cross-examining witnesses under oath before a judge is uncommon but, while American defendants lose their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination if they testify, Chinese defendants may say what they wish in their defense or refuse to be cross examined, without prejudice. If the investigating magistrate decides that the defendant is guilty the case goes to trial, which is really a sentencing hearing, but even if a defendant confesses and wishes to end the matter, the magistrate must hold an open trial and ask the defendant to confirm his confession publicly.

Though lawyers’ reputation in Chinese society has always been poor, the profession was boosted in 2012 when Li Keqiang⁠7, an expert on English common law, became Premier and, overnight, the Supreme Court’s internship program began attracting top students. Then President Xi suggested establishing independent judicial committees, including non-Party members, to select judges based on merit and professional track record and, by 2019, every province had an independent judicial committee to minimize local government interference, select and oversee the work of judges and prosecutors, and punish professional misconduct. Shanghai’s committee expelled a High Court prosecutor, two sub-prosecutors, the Vice President of the Provincial Supreme Court and a senior circuit court judge. Police, prosecutors and court officials are responsible for wrongful prosecutions until the day they die, and national appeals courts re-hear cases, overturn wrongful convictions, order restitution, and require lower courts to study their reversals.

The Supreme People’s Court’s website, with five billion visits, offers online courses on every element of the law, invites criticism of new laws, and provides an artificial intelligence interface to its six hundred thousand recorded trials. Its website invites citizens to email the Chief Justice, whose answers begin cheerily, “Hello! We received your question, and after consideration, we respond as follows…” and end with, “Thank you for your support of the work of the Supreme People’s Court!” Ultimately–since their ethical duty transcends their legal responsibility–the courts answer to the Party which, as arbiter of national ethics, prevents unethical and anti-democratic decisions⁠8. As former Chief Justice Xiao Yang explained, “The power of the courts to adjudicate independently doesn't mean independence from the Party at all. On the contrary, it embodies a high degree of responsibility vis-à-vis the Party’s [dàtóng⁠9] program.”

Though unarmed, police have powers their Western colleagues only dream of. Instead of removing miscreants from society they can issue temporary restraining orders and mandate home confinement, which gives them the opportunity to discuss solutions with their families. Convicted criminals–who can prosecute prison staff for breaching their rights–must receive humane levels of material comfort and dignity from arrest to release. Sentences are typically short, but prisoners must participate in career, legal, cultural, and moral counseling that focuses on the social consequences of their crimes. Even murderers are expected to repent, reform, and rejoin society.

Citizens can video police, who must publish the status of all arrestees online. TV programs regularly explain new laws and schools, offices, factories, mines and army units discuss concepts like the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence. After the success of a weekly TV show, I am a Barrister, the Legal Channel followed up with The Lawyers Are Here. Each episode introduces legal issues ranging from child custody to healthcare negligence and expert panels offer opinions and advise real litigants on air.

Online Trial Spots are reducing legal costs, promoting equitable outcomes and lightening the burden of enforcement. One app bundles free mediation, dispute settlement and legal aid and connects plaintiffs to thousands of lawyers, notaries and judicial appraisers. Another verifies plaintiffs’ and defendants’ IDs and combines face and speech recognition with electronic signatures, allowing them go to trial without leaving home. Using voice-to-text, it submits their files, transcribes their testimonies, and stores their case records in case of appeal. Beijing’s Internet Court provides artificial intelligence-based risk assessment as a public service and automatically generates legal documents, applies machine translation, and simplifies settlements through oral interaction with its knowledge base. In 2017 Hangzhou, home of Alibaba, launched the first cyber court exclusively for online e-commerce complaints, loan litigation, and copyright infringement. In its inaugural case, TikTok sued Baidu for ownership of user-generated video content.

With unarmed police, two percent of America’s legal professionals and one-fourth its per capita policing budget, China has the world’s lowest rates of imprisonment and re-offense. Crime remains low, trust is rising, and Beijingers no longer remove batteries from parked electric scooters. When Harvard’s Tony Saich⁠10 surveyed them about their greatest worry, most Chinese ranked ‘Maintenance of Social Order’ highest and when he asked which government service pleased them most they chose ‘Maintenance of Social Order.’

____________________________________________________________________________

NOTES

1 Report, 18th Party Congress, November 8, 2012. Xi was quoting from Confucius’ Analects.

2 Xi stresses integrating law, virtue in state governance. Xinhua. 2016-12-10

3 The Chinese term for nation-state is ‘nation-family’ and most Chinese would take for granted that the nation-state is an extended family.

4 Failure to do so can bring consequences. In 2018, when Liu Zehnhua committed suicide after raping and murdering Li Mingzhu, the court ordered Liu’s family to pay the Li family one hundred thousand dollars for failing to socialize their son.

5 In addition to People’s Mediation conducted by grassroots community mediators, China employs Judicial Mediation conducted by judges, Administrative Mediation conducted by government officials, Arbitral Mediation conducted by arbitral administrative bodies, and Industry Mediation conducted by specific industrial associations.

6 Average Person Spends $250 Per Year on Legal Services. Jay Reeves | April 14, 2015. Lawyers Mutual

7 At Peking University Law School in 1978, Li translated Lord Denning’s “The Due Process of Law,” becoming so proficient in the language that he broke protocol and spoke in fluent English at a Hong Kong University event in 2011.

8 In 2010 the US Supreme Court ruled that corporations can spend unlimited money on elections because limiting corporations’ “independent political spending” violates their First Amendment right to free speech.

9 A dàtóng society is the Chinese Dream, which Confucian scholar Kang Youwei rendered thus: “Now to have states, families, and selves is to allow each individual to maintain a sphere of selfishness. This infracts utterly the Universal Principle (gongli) and impedes progress...The only [true way] is sharing the world in common by all (tienxia weigong) This is the way of the Great Community, dàtóng, which prevailed in the Age of Universal Peace. Commentary on Liyun.

10 How China’s citizens view the quality of governance under Xi Jinping. Tony Saich. Journal of Chinese Governance. Vol 1, 2016

 


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

GODFREE ROBERTS, Senior Contributing Editor / Special Correspondent on Far Eastern affairs

Godfree Roberts was born in Australia and educated in the US, where he received Ed.D in Education & Geopolitics from UMass, Amherst. He lost his first job in 1961 for defending China's resumption of sovereignty over Tibet. He still annoys authorities by pointing out that the Chinese government has kept all its promises for the past 70 years while our government has broken them all. His book, Why China Leads the World, is forthcoming 2020. Roberts is a senior contributing editor and special correspondent on Far Eastern affairs. He is the publisher of Here Comes China Newsletter.  Roberts lives in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

[premium_newsticker id=”154171″]
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



All captions and pull quotes by the editors, not the authors, unless otherwise noted. 

 




RAY McGOVERN: Russiagate’s Last Gasp

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



One can read this most recent flurry of Russia, Russia, Russia paid the Taliban to kill GIs as an attempt to pre-empt the findings into Russiagate’s origins.

U.S. Army helicopter pilots fly near Jalalabad, Afghanistan, April 5, 2017. (U.S. Army, Brian Harris, Wikimedia Commons)

On Friday The New York Times featured a report based on anonymous intelligence officials that the Russians were paying bounties to have U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan with President Donald Trump refusing to do anything about it.  The flurry of Establishment media reporting that ensued provides further proof, if such were needed, that the erstwhile “paper of record” has earned a new moniker — Gray Lady of easy virtue.

Over the weekend, the Times’ dubious allegations grabbed headlines across all media that are likely to remain indelible in the minds of credulous Americans — which seems to have been the main objective. To keep the pot boiling this morning, The New York Times’ David Leonhardt’s daily web piece, “The Morning” calls prominent attention to a banal article by a Heather Cox Richardson, described as a historian at Boston College, adding specific charges to the general indictment of Trump by showing “how the Trump administration has continued to treat Russia favorably.” The following is from Richardson’s newsletter on Friday:

— “On June 15, news broke that Trump has ordered the removal of 9,500 troops from Germany, where they support NATO against Russian aggression. …”

Historian Richardson added:

“All of these friendly overtures to Russia were alarming enough when all we knew was that Russia attacked the 2016 U.S. election and is doing so again in 2020.  But it is far worse that those overtures took place when the administration knew that Russia had actively targeted American soldiers. … this bad news apparently prompted worried intelligence officials to give up their hope that the administration would respond to the crisis, and instead to leak the story to two major newspapers.”

Hear the siren? Children, get under your desks!

The Tall Tale About Russia Paying for Dead U.S. Troops

Times print edition readers had to wait until this morning to learn of Trump’s statement last night that he was not briefed on the cockamamie tale about bounties for killing, since it was, well, cockamamie.

Late last night the president tweeted: “Intel just reported to me that they did not find this info credible, and therefore did not report it to me or the VP. …”

For those of us distrustful of the Times — with good reason — on such neuralgic issues, the bounty story had already fallen of its own weight. As Scott Ritter pointed out yesterday:

Perhaps the biggest clue concerning the fragility of the New York Times’ report is contained in the one sentence it provides about sourcing — “The intelligence assessment is said to be based at least in part on interrogations of captured Afghan militants and criminals.” That sentence contains almost everything one needs to know about the intelligence in question, including the fact that the source of the information is most likely the Afghan government as reported through CIA channels. …”

And who can forget how “successful” interrogators can be in getting desired answers.

Attendees at the Taliban-U.S. peace signing ceremony in Doha, Qatar, on Feb. 29, 2020. (State Department/Ron Przysucha)

A Taliban spokesman called the story “baseless,” adding with apparent pride that “we” have done “target killings” for years “on our own resources.” 

Russia is no friend of the Taliban.  At the same time, it has been clear for several years that the U.S. would have to pull its troops out of Afghanistan.  Think back five decades and recall how circumspect the Soviets were in Vietnam.  Giving rhetorical support to a fraternal Communist nation was de rigueur and some surface-to-air missiles gave some substance to that support.

But Moscow recognized from the start that Washington was embarked on a fool’s errand in Vietnam. There would be no percentage in getting directly involved.  And so, the Soviets sat back and watched smugly as the Vietnamese Communists drove U.S. forces out on their “own resources.” As was the case with the Viet Cong, the Taliban needs no bounty inducements from abroad.

President Lyndon Johnson announces “retaliatory” strike against North Vietnam in response to the supposed attacks on U.S. warships in the Gulf of Tonkin on Aug. 4, 1964. (LBJ Library)

Besides, the Russians knew painfully well — from their own bitter experience in Afghanistan, what the outcome of the most recent fool’s errand would be for the U.S.  What point would they see in doing what The New York Times and other Establishment media are breathlessly accusing them of?

Former CIA Director William Casey said:  “We’ll know when our disinformation program is complete, when everything the American public believes is false.”

Casey made that remark at the first cabinet meeting in the White House under President Ronald Reagan in early 1981, according to Barbara Honegger, who was assistant to the chief domestic policy adviser.  Honegger was there, took notes, and told then Senior White House correspondent Sarah McClendon, who in turn made it public.

If Casey’s spirit is somehow observing the success of the disinformation program called Russiagate, one can imagine how proud he must be.  But sustained propaganda success can be a serious challenge.  The Russiagate canard has lasted three and a half years.  This last gasp effort, spearheaded by the Times, to breathe more life into it is likely to last little more than a weekend — the redoubled efforts of Casey-dictum followers notwithstanding.

Russiagate itself has been unraveling, although one would hardly know it from the Establishment media.  No collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.  Even the sacrosanct tenet that the Russians hacked the DNC emails published by WikiLeaks has been disproven, with the head of the DNC-hired cyber security firm CrowdStrike admitting that there is no evidence that the DNC emails were hacked — by Russia or anyone else.

U.S. Attorney John Durham. (Wikipedia)

How long will it take the Times to catch up with the CrowdStrike story, available since May 7?

The media is left with one sacred cow: the misnomered “Intelligence Community” Assessment of Jan. 6, 2017, claiming that President Putin himself ordered the hacking of the DNC. That “assessment” done by “hand-picked analysts” from only CIA, FBI and NSA (not all 17 intelligence agencies of the “intelligence community”) reportedly is being given close scrutiny by U. S. Attorney John Durham, appointed by the attorney general to investigate Russiagate’s origins.

If Durham finds it fraudulent (not a difficult task), the heads of senior intelligence and law enforcement officials may roll.  That would also mean a still deeper dent in the credibility of Establishment media that are only too eager to drink the Kool Aid and to leave plenty to drink for the rest of us.

Do not expect the media to cease and desist, simply because Trump had a good squelch for them last night — namely, the “intelligence” on the “bounties” was not deemed good enough to present to the president. 

(As a preparer and briefer of The President’s Daily Brief  to Presidents Reagan and HW Bush, I can attest to the fact that — based on what has been revealed so far — the Russian bounty story falls far short of the PDB threshold.)

Rejecting Intelligence Assessments

Nevertheless, the corporate media is likely to play up the Trump administration’s rejection of what the media is calling the “intelligence assessment” about Russia offering — as Rachel Maddow indecorously put it on Friday — “bounty for the scalps of American soldiers in Afghanistan.”

I am not a regular Maddow-watcher, but to me she seemed unhinged — actually, well over the top.

In other words, we can expect no let up from the media and the national security miscreant leakers who have served as their life’s blood.  As for the anchors and pundits, their level of sophistication was reflected yesterday in the sage surmise of Face the Nation’s Chuck Todd, who Aaron Mate reminds us, is a “grown adult and professional media person.”  Todd asked guest John Bolton: “Do you think that the president is afraid to make Putin mad because maybe Putin did help him win the election, and he doesn’t want to make him mad for 2020?”

This is as bad as it gets,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday, adding the aphorism she memorized several months ago: “All roads lead to Putin.”  The unconscionably deceitful performance of Establishment media is as bad as it gets, though that, of course, was not what Pelosi meant.  She apparently lifted a line right out of the Times about how Trump is too “accommodating” toward Russia.

One can read this most recent flurry of Russia, Russia, Russia as a reflection of the need to pre-empt the findings likely to issue from Durham and Attorney General William Barr in the coming months — on the theory that the best defense is a pre-emptive offense.  Meanwhile, we can expect the corporate media to continue to disgrace itself.

Vile

Caitlin Johnstone, typically, pulls no punches regarding the Russian bounty travesty: 

“All parties involved in spreading this malignant psyop are absolutely vile, but a special disdain should be reserved for the media class who have been entrusted by the public with the essential task of creating an informed populace and holding power to account. How much of an unprincipled whore do you have to be to call yourself a journalist and uncritically parrot the completely unsubstantiated assertions of spooks while protecting their anonymity? How much work did these empire fluffers put into killing off every last shred of their dignity? It boggles the mind.

It really is funny how the most influential news outlets in the Western world will uncritically parrot whatever they’re told to say by the most powerful and depraved intelligence agencies on the planet, and then turn around and tell you without a hint of self-awareness that Russia and China are bad because they have state media.

Sometimes all you can do is laugh.”

Ray McGovern works for Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington.  During his 27-years as a CIA analyst he led the Soviet Foreign Policy Branch and prepared The President’s Daily Brief for Presidents Nixon, Ford, and Reagan.  In retirement, he co-created Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).


 


 

 





Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License



ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL QUOTES BY THE EDITORS NOT THE AUTHORS
 



Merkel cites ‘hard evidence’ she was victim of ‘Russian hackers’, says it doesn’t help mend ties with Moscow

Please make sure these dispatches reach as many readers as possible. Share with kin, friends and workmates and ask them to do likewise.



RT.COM DISPATCH
Merkel's latest accusation only proves she's a shameless Washington putain: She's accusing Moscow of hacking her communications while conveniently forgetting the NSA was doing that in spades (as evidence surfaced in 2016) and probably still does. What's more, ALL major powers' intel agencies attempt to do that routinely. It's a recognised part of their job. 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License



Do people get the government they deserve? 



• remember: ALL CAPTIONS, IMAGES, PULL QUOTES AND ANNOTATIONS BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHOR—


[premium_newsticker id="211406"]


Read it in your language • Lealo en su idioma • Lisez-le dans votre langue • Lies es in Deiner Sprache • Прочитайте это на вашем языке • 用你的语言阅读

[google-translator]

OR you can simply scan our QR code—



 

 

 

Creative Commons License
THIS WORK IS LICENSED UNDER A Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


OF INTEREST TO OUR READERS

Acclaimed by critics, Ron Ridenour’s incisive history of the struggle between the US and Russia, extending from the Bolshevik revolution to our day, plus a wide-ranging and comprehensive analysis of many cultural America features which continue to  bolster the US drive for world domination, is now available in print at a discount price. It’s 564 pages packed with information, many critical but practically unknown facts, and an uncompromising revolutionary perspective on the colossal challenges confronting this generation. (Click here or on the image below to order.)

THE DEEP STATE IS CLOSING IN

The big social media —Google, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter—are trying to silence us.