“Niger Delta Avengers” Declare War on Western Oil Giants

WITNESSES TO HISTORY
CALEB T. MAUPIN

Niger Delta Avengers

“The Niger Delta Avengers have vowed to keep bombing oil installations until the government meets its demands.”
Read more: NAIJ


Roughly 70 percent of Nigerians — particularly those in the oil-rich Niger Delta region — live in poverty. That’s because Western oil giants like Shell and Chevron, not the Nigerian people, own and exploit the country’s lucrative resources. 

WASHINGTON — (Analysis)
On May 26, Chevron announced that it was shutting down its onshore operations in Nigeria due to “terrorism.” In the third assault targeting a Chevron facility in the country last month, the main electricity pipeline to one of Chevron’s facilities had been blown up.

The “Niger Delta Avengers” are claiming responsibility for that incident and others in an ongoing wave of attacks this year that have targeted Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron, Western oil giants operating in the country.

Many important facts about Nigeria, its history and its economy, are being left out of the media coverage of these events. The harsh living conditions of the 30 million people who live in the Niger Delta are the direct result of actions of foreign-headquartered oil giants operating in the region.

There is a long history of armed conflict and separatist movements in the Niger Delta, and the horrific conditions, and the international community’s failure to address them, are a primary factor in the continued unrest and rising violence in the region.

Nigeria is resource-rich, Nigerians are poor

Nigeria poverty

Children in the Makoko slum near Lagos, Nigeria, 2011. VOA News

In the aftermath of the destruction of Libya, Nigeria is now the top oil-producing country in Africa. It’s also home to vast natural gas and mineral reserves.

However, despite all these lucrative resources, Nigeria’s 173 million people are some of the poorest on Earth. According to the CIA World Factbook, Nigerians have an average life expectancy of just 53. Illiteracy is rampant, infant mortality rates run high, and roughly 70 percent of the population lives below the poverty line. Of Nigerians ages 5 to 14, 29 percent work as child laborers.

So why is it that Nigerians, who live in a country with such an abundance of human labor and natural resources, live in such horrific conditions? The reason is that these economic assets do not belong to them and they are not controlled by them. Western corporations like Royal Dutch Shell and Chevron — not the Nigerian people — have control of the country’s wealth.

According to the U.S. National Institutes of Health, the Niger Delta region itself contains “20 billion of Africa’s proven 66 billion barrels of oil reserves and more than 3 trillion cubic meters of gas reserves.” The region accounts for some 70 percent of Nigeria’s national income. Though Nigerian oil production is dropping, the exports continue to rise. U.S. imports of Nigerian crude oil are currently rising. In mid-March, the U.S. was importing an average of 559,000 barrels per day, up from just 52,000 barrels for all of 2015.

Yet the people of the Niger Delta region live in shacks. Photographs published by the Daily Mail in 2013 showed Niger Delta residents drying their clothes on the oil and gas pipelines that crisscross their neighborhoods. Niger Delta residents feed themselves by slaying wild animals, and fishing from heavily contaminated ocean waters. Children play on beaches blackened by crude oil spills.

Residents of the Niger Delta region live under the gun, not just of the Nigerian military and police, but also by Shell’s private militia, which has over 1,200 active soldiers. According to internal financial data leaked to The Guardian, Shell has spent tens of millions of dollars on “a 1,200-strong internal police force in Nigeria, plus a network of plainclothes informants.”

“The documents show that nearly 40% of Shell’s total security expenditure over the three year period [2007-2009] – $383m (£244m) – was spent on protecting its staff and installations in Nigeria’s volatile Niger delta region,” Afua Hirsch and John Vidal reported in 2012. “In 2009, $65m was spent on Nigerian government forces and $75m on ‘other’ security costs – believed to be a mixture of private security firms and payments to individuals.”

Meanwhile, while the oil giant shells out billions to bolster security, the environmental conditions of the Niger Delta are widely decried. Oil spills and fires are an everyday occurrence. The air is heavily polluted and dangerous to breathe. Water contamination in the Delta Region has reached alarming levels. Tens of millions of barrels of oil have been spilled in the Niger Delta over the last few decades. Shell has been caught deliberately fabricating the extent of environmental damage and the health impact on the population, and not fulfilling its obligations to clean up oil spills.

Nigeria only recently became Africa’s top oil exporting country. For most of the past few decades, Libya was the continent’s top oil exporter, exporting as many as 1.2 million barrels of oil per day. Prior to the NATO intervention in 2011, Libya had the highest life expectancy on the entire continent. It boasted universal housing and literacy, along with free healthcare and education for the entire population. The “Islamic Socialist” government that ruled Libya from 1969 to 2011, nationalized the country’s oil resources and used the proceeds to fund the development of the country.

When the foreign-backed uprising broke out in 2011, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi was floating the idea of establishing a new currency for the African Union. Libya convened two international conferences to discuss the idea of establishing the “Gold Dinar,” and selling Libyan oil with a currency based in Africa that could rival to the dollar and the euro.

The reason behind the divergence in the standard of living in Libya and Nigeria is clear: Libya controlled and exported its own oil resources, while Nigeria’s economy was left at the mercy of international conglomerates based in the West.

A repressive, U.S.-backed regime

The impoverished, oil-rich Nigerian nation is presided over by a government that has shocked the world with its human rights violations.

The current president of Nigeria is Muhammadu Buhari, who served as the country’s military dictator from 1983 to 1985 after seizing power in a coup d’etat. He armed his police with whips, executed people for petty crimes like counterfeiting, and sent university students to prison for 21 years for cheating on their exams.

Buhari routinely imprisoned and executed his political opponents, attempting to establish credibility as a “strong man” before being removed by one of his generals in 1985.

Buhari assumed office as president of Nigeria last May, bringing the lengthy, corruption-laced presidency of Goodluck Jonathan to an end.

Nigeria’s problems with human rights were highlighted in 1995, when Ken Saro-Wiwa was convicted of murder and summarily executed. The Nigerian activist, who led a peaceful movement for recognition of Nigerians’ environmental and human rights, was a recipient of the Goldman Environmental Prize and the Right Livelihood Award.

In 2009, Shell was forced to pay millions of dollars of reparations to Wiwa’s family. It was made apparent in U.S. Federal Courts that Shell had manipulated Nigeria’s legal system in order to have a prominent critic oftheir environmental policies killed.

On Jan. 9, 2012 the U.S.-backed Nigerian government once again demonstrated its knack for repression when Nigerians held a general strike opposing the cuts in fuel subsidies. The response of the government to the peaceful, country-wide work stoppage was a brutal crackdown in which live ammunition was fired at protesters, and several people were killed. Roaming armed squads were deployed to forcibly end the general strike.

In December of 2015 the Nigerian military perpetrated the Zaria massacre. The Nigerian military stormed the neighborhood where the Islamic Movement in Nigeria was headquartered, killing many unarmed residents. Amnesty International estimates that at least 350 people were killed, while others estimate that it could have been nearly 1,000. Ibrahim Al-Zakzaky, a Shiite cleric who had been working to bring Christians and Muslims in Nigeria together and to oppose the terrorism of Boko Haram, has been held in military detention ever since.

Today, the Salafist terrorist organization called Boko Haram, which calls itself the African affiliate of Daesh (an Arabic acronym for the extremist group commonly known as ISIS or ISIL in the West), continues to wage a campaign of terrorism across Nigeria. A growing body of evidence suggests that local government officials in Nigeria support Boko Haram.

Interestingly, Hillary Clinton, the current Democratic presidential frontrunner, refused to list Boko Haram as a terrorist organization when she served as U.S. Secretary of State. Her reasons were unclear.

Despite its frequent human rights violations, Nigeria is among the top recipients of U.S. foreign aid. U.S. military advisors are in Nigeria, working with the government in anti-terrorism efforts. After being elected, the former dictator Buhari visited the U.S. and met with President Barack Obama. Obama described Buhari, who tortured and repressed his people as a military dictator from 1983 to 1985, as having a “reputation for integrity and a very clear agenda.”

‘Terrorism’ after years of plunder

The Niger Delta Avengers blew up the Chevron Valve Platform located on the high sea near Escravos in Warri, Delta State in a renewed attack on western oil installations.

U.S. media reports about the “terrorism” of the Niger Delta Avengers are ignoring the context. Nigeria, an oil-producing country, has been subjected to the theft of its natural resources — robbery that’s enforced by foreign-backed governments that violate human rights.

The people of Nigeria, especially those of the Niger Delta region, have been subjected to great suffering at the hands of international oil companies and their allies.

Peaceful movements such as Sheikh Ibrahim Zakzaky’s “Islamic Movement in Nigeria” have been ruthlessly crushed

A statement from the Niger Delta Avengers describes their intention with attacking Chevron facilities. It says:

“To international Oil Companies, this is just the beginning and you have not seen anything yet. We will make you suffer as you have been made the people of Niger deltans suffered over the years from environmental degradation, and environment pollution.”

The statement goes on to demand change and justice for their region:

“We want a country that will turn the creeks of the Niger delta to a tourism heaven, a country that will achieve its full potentials, a country that will make health care system accessible by everyone. With Niger delta still under the country Nigeria we can’t make it possible. So we are calling on the Ban Ki-Moon Secretary General United Nations and all Heads of the government of the five Permanent Security Council members to come to the aid of Niger delta people. We are calling on world leaders to come to the Niger delta to see the atrocities committed by the Nigeria government.”

The people of Nigeria, especially the oil- and natural gas-rich Niger Delta, have plenty to avenge. If the international media and the leaders of the world bothered to highlight the scandalous reality of everyday life in an oil-rich country, and if world leaders bothered to do something to improve these conditions, it’s likely that the violence unfolding in the Niger Delta would not be happening. Of course, these details are ignored in continued sensationalist coverage about “terrorists.”

 

black-horizontal

Caleb Maupin
Screen Shot 2016-02-04 at 9.46.00 AMIs an American journalist and political analyst. Tasnim News Agency described him as "a native of Ohio who has campaigned against war and the U.S. financial system." His political activism began while attending Baldwin-Wallace College in Ohio. In 2010, he video recorded a confrontation between Collinwood High School students who walked out to protest teacher layoffs and the police. His video footage resulted in one of the students being acquitted in juvenile court. He was a figure within the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York City. Maupin writes on American foreign policy and other social issues. Maupin is featured as a Distinguished Collaborator with The Greanville Post.  READ MORE ABOUT CALEB MAUPIN HERE.

 Source: Mint Press


Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long grey

Screen Shot 2015-12-08 at 2.57.29 PM

Nauseated by the
vile corporate media?
Had enough of their lies, escapism,
omissions and relentless manipulation?

GET EVEN.
Send a donation to 

The Greanville Post–or
SHARE OUR ARTICLES WIDELY!
But be sure to support YOUR media.
If you don’t, who will?

horiz-black-wide
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary.  In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.  

[email-subscribers namefield=”YES” desc=”” group=”Public”]




Why The Animal Movement Has Been Politically Unsophisticated And Philosophically Confused

By  Roland Windsor Vincent
Editor, Eco-Socialism, the Environment, and Animal Rights

A protest against seal slaughter organized by Fiends of Animals (FoA). The organization was founded by Alice Herrington who, like most of her generation and social class, was basically clueless and indifferent about the political roots of animal exploitation. Unfortunately, the next generation has not proved a marked improvement in that regard.

A protest against seal slaughter organized by Friends of Animals (FoA). The organization was founded by Alice Herrington who, like most of her generation and social class, was basically clueless and indifferent about the political roots of animal exploitation. Unfortunately, the next generation has not proved a marked improvement in that regard.

The paucity of involvement by animal activists in the political arena, in general, and in the politics of the real Left, in particular, is explainable if not excusable.

Early animal activists were mostly comfortable suburbanites, the products of middle class backgrounds and Conservative political philosophy.  Their experience in political struggles was virtually non-existent, and certainly did not extend to radical social issues of the day, ie, civil rights, integration, and voting rights.

In seeking political support to end the more egregious abuses of animals with which they became familiar, they turned to those with whom they were familiar, their Conservative elected officials. The issues that primarily concerned those early activists regarded dogs, cats, and vivisection of laboratory animals.

 

It should have been immediately apparent to those early activists that they were imploring the enemy for help. Of course, they had no clue.

Even then Conservative politicians were firmly in the grasp of Big Pharm and the medical lobby, and concerns about abuse and torture of animals in medical research fell upon deaf ears. Activists were placated with lip service about stray dogs and cats, and they went away feeling they had impacted those in positions to help.

No such help was ever received. Then, the enactment of the Animal Protection Act in 1966, engineered by Republican Robert Dole and signed into law by Democrat Lyndon Johnson, convinced the rather naive activists that animal issues transcended partisan political agendas, and that the plights of animals, and the solutions to those plights were totally apolitical or at least non-partisan.

Almost 50 years later the damage done by that misguided notion is only beginning to be recognized.

Since those early years of the animal movement the country has come under the growing influence of Big Business, Wall Street, the Banks, Big Oil, and Big Agriculture. Their power is based upon the politicians whose campaigns they finance and upon whom they bestow contributions and gifts. They are rewarded with the passage of legislation they favor and with the appointments of industry insiders and lobbyists to position of authority in agencies regulating those very industries. The result is as predictable as it is pernicious: Industries are running the government, at least insofar as legislation and regulatory oversight is concerned.

And it is just that legislation and oversight which operates against the interests of animals where they conflict with the interests of business.

The result is Big Oil destroying wildlife habitats, Big Pharm is killing millions of laboratory animals each year, Big Ag is opposing any relief to the suffering of animals trapped in the food system, Conservative politicians are defending puppy mills, circuses, and aquatic parks, etc, as free enterprise.

Even with the mountain of evidence that Conservative politicians are the mouthpieces for business, apologists for the exploitation of animals, and defenders of animal cruelty, there are still animal activists who refuse to look at the evidence and who defend the Conservatives’ records.

Fortunately, those activists are advancing in years and giving way to a younger, more politically astute crop of animal defenders and movement leaders.

This next generation of activists is better educated, more Liberal,
familiar with history, and possessed of worldviews that embrace universal rights and the struggle for both human and animal liberation.

The Animal Rights moment has its dinosaurs. They are older, politically unsophisticated, philosophically adrift, and clutching feverishly to the notion that somehow Republicans and Conservative Democrats share their interests. They have to believe it, lest their whole world crumbles around them.

They will have been proven to have been wrong for the entirety of their lives.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

rolandVincentRoland Windsor Vincent is an Animal Rights activist, political strategist, attorney, public speaker, and writer. He is now TGP’s Special Editor for Socialism, Environment & Animal Rights.

Friend him on Facebook: www.facebook.com/RolandWindsorVincent
Follow his blog:
www.ArmoryOfTheRevolution.com