RT.COM had it right 5 years ago: The war of images – video of Syrian events, and their interpretation 


horiz grey linetgplogo12313


[dropcap]N[/dropcap]ote this article appeared five years ago (21 Oct, 2011). The author clearly analyzes and identifies the forces that since have become irrefutably connected with the tragedy and destruction of Syria as a united nation and viable civilization. Obviously it was quite possible to explain and tell the truth about events in Syria even then, when wide diffusion of such facts could have saved millions of people from extreme suffering and death. So why didn’t the big guns of the Western press do a similarly commendable job? Why did they remain silent? Were they just suddenly afflicted by a general case of gross incompetence? No need to answer that; it’s just a rhetorical question. We know the answer. And it’s beyond shameful; it’s criminal.


 Published time: 21 Oct, 2011

syria-2011-pro-regime-damascus-president-shout

Supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad shout slogans during a pro-regime rally in Damascus on October 12, 2011 (AFP Photo / Louai Beshara) / AFP

The unrest engulfing Syria is mirrored in the internet with a PR-civil-war. While some videos show “atrocious bandits”, others opt for “atrocious army men”. And none shows what ordinary Syrians live through.


Unlike other countries of the Arab Spring, there are a lot of different videos about Syria on the internet. TV channels around the world broadcast selective videos of atrocities by armed men. At the same time, they fail to show millions of Syrians rallying to support the government. And they don’t show videos of atrocities against Syrian people.

“The atrocity of bandits in this video is a sign that the US made a misjudgment,” Anhar Kochneva, director of the Jordan Club tourism organization comments on the video. “And now they are making an attempt of intimidating. It’s not a secret that they started preparing the anti-Syrian campaigns 10 years ago. They were proceeding from their understanding of Syrian people’s hatred toward the government, but they failed to notice that the country changed. They began supporting the anti-government rallies, but they failed to notice that these rallies actually brought people together. Millions of people just recently rallied in Aleppo, which the US considered an opposition center. The US believed that Syrians themselves would overthrow and betray Bashar al-Assad, but they failed to achieve an overturn performed by Syrians. Now they send in bandits, Syrians as well as those who co-operate with Americans among them. Some who got captured had performed terrible atrocities under the influence of drugs. For many of them, the only education they ever had was several years of school.”

 

Syrian army regulars celebrating a recent victory and hailing Assad.

Syrian army regulars celebrating a recent victory and hailing Assad.

Kochneva believes that the US Security Force rules these atrocities of bandits:

“Facebook didn’t work. They caused a provocation in Daraa but it didn’t work either. In the mid-April, the opposition met with Dan Feldman, representative of Hillary Clinton, in Istanbul. WikiLeaks reported that at that meeting a decision was made to start killing servicemen who at that time were unarmed, throughout the entire country. Four or 5 days later, servicemen in different parts of Syria were brutally murdered. And presently, many soldiers and officers are getting killed. Armed groups are kidnapping and murdering state officials.

“There are two centers of unrest left, Homs and Idleb. These videos show fierce terror of Sthe summer of 2011 in these cities. Three thousand people were killed, a third of them servicemen, and a lot of state officials. Ninety per cent of these murders were performed by bandits. This is what happened recently: officials stopped for a coffee on their way somewhere, and they got murdered.

“Bandits have been causing outrage in the north of the country, as there are many villages and forests there, which means a place for them to hide,” says Kochneva.

What’s the footwear of Syrian officers?

The Western media show videos of “atrocities of the Syrian army”. Kochneva comments on one of the most popular videos (of an officer beating up a boy): “Why is this officer wearing beach slippers?”

“Unlike foreigners, the entire Syria knows what the army wears on their feet. In the area of Hama, an army uniform warehouse was robbed. Bandits wore these uniforms while looting and ransacking, and making videos of this kind. There was just one trouble – no boots at the warehouse. Therefore the officers in the video are wearing beach slippers. Moreover, after this robbery, the army was quickly transferred to a different type of uniform. Furthermore, how can anyone understand why officers would record their own dirt and post it in the internet? They aren’t even allowed to go home; when would they find time to spend at an internet café? The army has a high authority, and people really ask them to enter their settlements to protect them.”

Kochneva is convinced that the West intentionally places a barrier for news from Syria. Otherwise, she believes, the EU and the US would not have imposed sanctions on the broadcast of Dunya, a Syrian TV channel which discusses videos of this kind of detail. Particularly, this channel even broadcasts the negotiations of the opposition. Some crafty migrants found a way of making voice chats discussing plans for destabilizing the country publicly available. Kochneva believes the authorities managed to take control over the country and to gain the support of the majority:

“People are laughing already at conspirators and their instructors. A French ambassador who attempted to talk patriarch Ignatius into supporting the US had tomatoes and eggs thrown at him when he was taken outside. A US ambassador, who was watching a rally to support peace in Syria from his car window, got wrapped in a Syrian flag with Bashar al-Assad’s portrait on it. People are saying, ‘Yes, there was terror, it was frightening and confusing; but we’re no longer afraid of you.’”

syria-sssad-bloodBath

Not only have the Western media failed to report the truth. They have also engaged in an unrelenting propaganda campaign against Russia, Putin, Iran and Assad with the (by now) well known object of demonizing them, chiefly to prepare the American population for “extreme” measures against such targets. This is a typical cartoon floated by the presstitutes to besmirch Assad’s image.

How to create chaos

[dropcap]R[/dropcap]ussian political scientist Ruslan Kurbanov, who spent several years in the Islamic environment in Syria, agrees that there are no preconditions for a civil war; even though several years ago one would have thought that it was indeed possible to happen. According to his observations, unhappiness with the authorities was in the air as early as 2005. It was mainly expressed in rumors:

“They said that people were disappearing. They were allegedly kidnapped by Mukhabarat for being unreliable. They said that kidnapped people were found several years later in prisons. They whispered about terrible conditions in Syrian prisons. I saw those who were personally affected by abuse of power. A family member of one of them was imprisoned for opposition-oriented statements; a relative of another one disappeared; a friend of yet another one went to Iraq, and now Mukhabarat examines his acquaintances. But this was just a tiny percentage of people.”

There were also rumors of stopping armed people:

“They said that armed people were stopped in Damascus. They stated those were militants. There were rumors about attacking and shooting between militants and the authorities,” says Kurbanov.

But the official Syrian media did not respond to these rumors in any way, neither confirming nor denying them.

Kurbanov notes the following characteristic episode:

“Policemen in the street would not respond to the traditional greeting, ‘salam aleikum’. When I asked the locals why the police would not respond to my ‘salam’, I was told that all of the police are Alawis, and they do not like Sunnis, especially explicit ones.”

What is more likely to prevail: hatred toward the US, or tribal ideology?

According to Kurbanov, Syria’s Islamic circles have a strong feeling of resentment against the United States. People are very annoyed by the US trying to impose its standards on Syria, even with regard to modes of dress, and they are upset that the Syrian government agrees to adopt these standards.

“For example, Syria’s authorities conceded to US demands and introduced tight pants for female students in high schools. There were also rumors about the US dictating to the Syrian government whether it should enroll foreign applicants in Islamic universities or not.”

Kurbanov recalls that the US had once declared Syria part of the “Axis of Evil”, and many Syrians feared that the Americans would start bombing Syria the way they did to Iraq. However, Kurbanov believes the US quagmire in Iraq could have its own implication for Syria.

“There were a lot of Syrians who volunteered to fight in Iraq. Bashar al-Assad rode this wave and agitated those who were spoiling for the fight. He let Syrians volunteers infiltrate Iraq. But those fighters were aware that after Iraq, they were to take on the regime back in Syria. I would not rule out that the lone gunners whom the Syrian government later had to hunt down at home were actually former insurgency fighters heading back from Iraq. In fact, it was not that difficult to creep over the border. I have heard stories about people from Syria easily slipping into Iraq, and even Afghanistan, and then coming back. I believe it is possible that some of Syria’s Iraq veterans jumped into the fight at home as soon as it started.”

Kurbanov believes that the animosity and atrocities committed by the opposition as it can be seen from TV films is a manifestation of tribal psychology rather than of an Islamic or revolutionary one:

“In my view, there was no soil for mutual hatred in society until the very last moment. But if blood was spilled in the first protests, I assume that the crowd might easily get filled with thirst to revenge the regime and separate soldiers. Even in the capital the Arabs have preserved their tribal mentality and are ready to stand up for their people.”

Kurbanov believes that the abundance of false reels about the army atrocities has a political goal of causing chaos in the country and forcing Syria to break up its union with Iran.

“I assume that these fakes are being injected into Syrian society to accelerate the speed of the explosion. Forces that are interested in this explosion want to break up Syria’s union with Iran. They include the United States, Saudi Arabia and Sunni Jihad fighters,” Kurbanov said.

Nadezhda Kevorkova, RT


Note to Commenters
Due to severe hacking attacks in the recent past that brought our site down for up to 11 days with considerable loss of circulation, we exercise extreme caution in the comments we publish, as the comment box has been one of the main arteries to inject malicious code. Because of that comments may not appear immediately, but rest assured that if you are a legitimate commenter your opinion will be published within 24 hours. If your comment fails to appear, and you wish to reach us directly, send us a mail at: editor@greanvillepost.com

We apologize for this inconvenience. 

horiz-long grey




black-horizontal

=SUBSCRIBE TODAY! NOTHING TO LOSE, EVERYTHING TO GAIN.=
free • safe • invaluable

If you appreciate our articles, do the right thing and let us know by subscribing. It’s free and it implies no obligation to you—ever. We just want to have a way to reach our most loyal readers on important occasions when their input is necessary.  In return you get our email newsletter compiling the best of The Greanville Post several times a week.  

[email-subscribers namefield=”YES” desc=”” group=”Public”]

Screen Shot 2015-12-08 at 2.57.29 PM

Nauseated by the
vile corporate media?
Had enough of their lies, escapism,
omissions and relentless manipulation?

GET EVEN.
Send a donation to 

The Greanville Post–or
SHARE OUR ARTICLES WIDELY!
But be sure to support YOUR media.
If you don’t, who will?

horiz-black-wide
ALL CAPTIONS AND PULL-QUOTES BY THE EDITORS, NOT THE AUTHORS.




black-horizontal




VIDEO: Collegehumor’s “Is Meat Murder?”

We’ve reached a true turning point. Now even mainstream comedy websites are starting to accept vegetarianism as a legitimate, ethically ideal lifestyle.




VIDEO: Collegehumor’s “Is Meat Murder?”

We’ve reached a true turning point. Now even mainstream comedy websites are starting to accept vegetarianism as a legitimate, ethically ideal lifestyle.




‘Attack on Journalism’: WikiLeaks Responds to Google’s Cooperation with US Government

Reuters / Dado Ruvic

CREDIT: Reuters / Dado Ruvic

 A DISPATCH FROM RT.COM

[dropcap]Google’s [/dropcap]willingness to surrender the private emails of WikiLeaks staffers to the United States government amounts to an “attack on journalism,” a representative for the whistleblower group says.

Kristinn Hrafnsson, an Icelandic journalist who joined WikiLeaks as the group’s spokesman in 2010, said he’s “appalled” that Google gave up his personal correspondence and other sensitive details to the US government in compliance with a search warrant served to the tech giant, apparently in an effort to bring charges against the anti-secrecy organization and its editor, Julian Assange.

“I believe this is an attack on me. As a journalist for now almost 30 years, I think this is an attack on journalism,” Hrafnsson said Monday at a press conference in Geneva, Switzerland.

○ Left: Kristinn Hrafnsson, an Icelandic journalist who joined WikiLeaks as the group’s spokesman in 2010. ○ Right: WikiLeaks' Investigations editor Sarah Harrison. 

○ Left: Kristinn Hrafnsson, an Icelandic journalist who joined WikiLeaks as the group’s spokesman in 2010. | ○ Right: WikiLeaks’ Investigations editor Sarah Harrison.

Earlier that day, WikiLeaks announced that the Google accounts registered to three staffers – Hrafnsson, investigations editor Sarah Harrison and senior editor Joseph Farrell – had been the subject of federal search warrants served to the tech giant in March 2012.

READ MORE: WikiLeaks ‘astonished and disturbed’: Google gave its major staff data to US govt

According to Hrafnsson, the warrants compelled Google to give up the contents of the WikiLeaks staffers’ Gmail accounts, including deleted messages, draft emails, photo attachments and information about the IP addresses where those accounts had logged on from.

“I’m a little surprised to learn that Google keeps emails I have deleted,” Hrafnsson said. “That is what I read out of the documents.”

wikileaks1Michael Ratner, the US lawyer for WikiLeaks and Assange, said Monday that “essentially everything associated with the accounts of these three journalists” was seized by the government after Google was served in March 2012 and therefore ordered to give up all account data preceding that date by early April.

“The warrants acted like a huge vacuum cleaner,” he said. “It’s shocking that the US would do that to a journalist organization and to journalists working in that organization.”

WikiLeaks was not made aware of the search warrants until two-and-a-half years later on December 23, 2014, however, and, as of this week, the organization is publicly demanding answers from Google and the government.

Had Google been made aware of the warrants at the time, the group may have been able to fight back, according to Ratner.

“We don’t know if Google tried to litigate it or not, but that’s one of our requests,” Ratner said, adding that in a previous, similar situation, Twitter tried to fend off government requests for user data.

“Google claims there was a gag order in order to prohibit them from telling our clients,” Ratner added. “But the question is: did Google litigate that gag order so it could tell its subscribers, or did it simply let the government suck up all of its subscriber information? We need to know that.”

Hrafnsson and Harrison acknowledged Monday that they have not used their Google accounts for any internal matters concerning WikiLeaks since joining the group, but the spokesperson said his inbox contained upwards of 35,000 emails when it was seized, and Ratner believes the total trove also includes privileged attorney-client correspondence sent between journalists and their counsel.

According to Ratner, the warrants against Hrafnsson, Harrison and Farrell “were done on the basis that the US asserted that the emails and other material from these journalists contained evidence in violation of the Espionage Act, conspiracy to commit espionage, violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and other federal laws,” and comes in the midst of a federal investigation into the organization that was launched in 2010.

wikileaks-harrison

“In other words, somehow the US was putting together a conspiracy charge or espionage and perhaps more against WikiLeaks and the journalists associated,” Ratner said.

“This case shows the direction and the will and the breakdown of the legal process with the US government when it comes to WikiLeaks,” added Harrison, who made headlines in 2013 after she accompanied former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden from Hong Kong to Russia. Snowden, the 31-year-old former systems administrator now wanted in the US for espionage and theft, has since rallied for enhanced protections for journalists and sources.

wikileaks-andrewBlake

“Laws are made to protect national security, not people working within national security agencies,” Hrafnsson said on Monday.

As tech firms are routinely caught cooperating with governments, though, it’s becoming increasingly clear that the communications of foreign journalists – be they in the national security realm or otherwise – are in danger of falling prey to federally-sanctioned eavesdropping.

“You cannot rely on any communications, either working with your sources of leaks or anybody, and assume it is secure unless it is heavily encrypted. Emails, chats, et cetera,” Hrafnsson said during Monday’s event in Geneva. “But this runs deeper than that. The implication is also that if you are working on a story that is deemed as unfavorable to the superpower on the other side of the Atlantic, you might be branded a terrorist. They might wave the Espionage Act of 1917…and other legal mechanisms to try to silence you. That is the real implication to all journalists.”

“This is yet another illustration of how far down the slippery slope our country has fallen,” said Ladar Levison, an online entrepreneur who shut down his email service, Lavabit, in 2013 after he was asked by the government to compromise the entire system for the sake of eavesdropping on a single customer who is largely presumed to be Snowden.

READ MORE: Spooked off the Net: Owner of Lavabit email blames US surveillance for closure

“It’s clear that surveillance capabilities intended for the pursuit of criminals have been used for a purely political purpose. How many times must evil be allowed to collaborate with time and corrupt a noble intent? If we allow these tools to exist, and be used in secret, then regardless of promises to the contrary, they will be used to further a malicious end,” Levison told RT’s Andrew Blake.

The latest revelations concerning the seized Google accounts also ring similar to an incident in which Herbert Snorrason and Smári McCarthy, two Icelanders both known publicly as one-time associates of WikiLeaks, learned only in June 2013 that their Google accounts had long been compromised by the US government pursuant to an investigation into the group. An American volunteer for WikiLeaks, Jacob Appelbaum, has previously seen his personal Twitter account, Google account and records from his Internet Service Provider seized by the US government, as well.

READ MORE: US government seizes Gmail of WikiLeaks volunteer

Chelsea Manning, the 27-year-old US Army private who provided WikiLeaks with classified military documents in 2009 and 2010, is currently serving a 35-year prison sentence for her role with the website. Chicago hacktivist Jeremy Hammond, 30, of Chicago, is serving a decade for his part in stealing private data from an intelligence firm that was later published by WikiLeaks. And last week, writer Barrett Brown, 33, was dealt a 5.5 year sentence, in part for aiding Hammond after the hack occurred.

On Monday, Ratner said a federal probe into WikiLeaks and Assange was still open, per a government admission, as of last May. Assange, 43, has resided within the Ecuadorian embassy in London for over two years awaiting safe passage to South America, where he has been granted asylum. The WikiLeaks editor has not been charged with a crime, but is wanted for questioning regarding allegations of sexual misconduct in Sweden.


 

“Google’s willingness to surrender the private emails of WikiLeaks staffers to the United States government amounts to an “attack on journalism,” a representative for the whistleblower group says.

Kristinn Hrafnsson, an Icelandic journalist who joined ‪#‎WikiLeaks‬ as the group’s spokesman in 2010, said he’s “appalled” that ‪#‎Google‬ gave up his personal correspondence and other sensitive details to the US government in compliance with a search warrant served to the tech giant, apparently in an effort to bring charges against the anti-secrecy organization and its editor, Julian Assange.

“I believe this is an attack on me. As a journalist for now almost 30 years, I think this is an attack on journalism,” Hrafnsson said Monday at a press conference in Geneva, Switzerland.

Earlier that day, WikiLeaks announced that the Google accounts registered to three staffers – Hrafnsson, investigations editor Sarah Harrison and senior editor Joseph Farrell – had been the subject of federal search warrants served to the tech giant in March 2012.

According to Hrafnsson, the warrants compelled Google to give up the contents of the WikiLeaks staffers’ Gmail accounts, including deleted messages, draft emails, photo attachments and information about the IP addresses where those accounts had logged on from.

“I’m a little surprised to learn that Google keeps emails I have deleted,” Hrafnsson said. “That is what I read out of the documents.”

WikiLeaks Tweet:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/559738167184871424

Michael Ratner, the US lawyer for WikiLeaks and Assange, said Monday that “essentially everything associated with the accounts of these three journalists” was seized by the government after Google was served in March 2012 and therefore ordered to give up all account data preceding that date by early April.

“The warrants acted like a huge vacuum cleaner,” he said. “It’s shocking that the US would do that to a journalist organization and to journalists working in that organization.”

WikiLeaks was not made aware of the search warrants until two-and-a-half years later on December 23, 2014, however, and, as of this week, the organization is publicly demanding answers from Google and the government.

Had Google been made aware of the warrants at the time, the group may have been able to fight back, according to Ratner.

“We don’t know if Google tried to litigate it or not, but that’s one of our requests,” Ratner said, adding that in a previous, similar situation, Twitter tried to fend off government requests for user data.

“Google claims there was a gag order in order to prohibit them from telling our clients,” Ratner added. “But the question is: did Google litigate that gag order so it could tell its subscribers, or did it simply let the government suck up all of its subscriber information? We need to know that.”

Hrafnsson and Harrison acknowledged Monday that they have not used their Google accounts for any internal matters concerning WikiLeaks since joining the group, but the spokesperson said his inbox contained upwards of 35,000 emails when it was seized, and Ratner believes the total trove also includes privileged attorney-client correspondence sent between journalists and their counsel.

WikiLeaks Tweet:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/559736756808196096

http://rt.com/usa/226415-wikileaks-geneva-levison-blake/

 

▬▬▬
COMMENTS (SAMPLE)

  • Of course they intend to remove Journalism, period. Nothing short of that. When the bloodletting begins in Russia and then in China, all actual news will be not available on pain of death. This is what the UNited States is planning. Like they did in Iraq, remember? No counting of Iraqi dead or maimed. No filming of the US flag draped caskets of slain US soldiers. Bush 11 was restarting his father’s criminal war Bush1 was almost impeached for. Cheney, Rumsfeld et al took care of that with US set up 9/11. Where all law was removed, no more impeachments possible. No matter what Obama does he is allie-allie-in-free. He is sure of this.
  • Bob Jones
    0    
    I would think that “high risk” people wouldn’t use their real names and accounts ??? I mean really ? how hard is it to get one persons information and use it yourself ?…………don’t forget to cover your webcam and use a couple catch 22’s…..If you haven’t figured out by now….whether you’re an international spy or a toddler …..you are being watched !
  • Shu-Shu
    0    
    Backdated for justice deleted e-mails ? oh its a bright and happy world in the us justice department nothing better to do as the empire falls to dust hurry up dissolve you bunch of crazy self obsessed Fkwits do as much evil deeds as you can while every awake person nestles in of a huge laugh as Julian emerges free from the embassy and Justice in USA is over run with maggot infestation
  • Lanet
    +5    
    You think they stop at emails? You have NO idea…
  • TYonge
    -4    
    Henry . I can see what your saying… Billy `s article is neat, I just purchased a great opel after having made $4881 this-past/5 weeks and in excess of 10k this past month . it’s realy the coolest work I’ve had . I began this 8-months ago and straight away got me minimum $72 per hour . visit here …………………..w­w­w.jobshobby.com
  • sfr rmn
    +9    
    Well the little thing we can do is stop using Gmail.. The most corrupt government on earth..
  • Love & Theft
    +12    
    The Corporations and Institutions of the US Government have become so bloated with corruption and negligence fostered by a revolving door of Chairpersons with dead ideas, that they now heave their distorted bodies around stomping the sh1t out of liberty. And thru it all they have the audacity to
    slobber their line…. It is we …who are under attack. Behold! The Institutionalized Idiot.
  • That is the new world government and order all arranged!
  • Samuel de Klerk
    +19    
    Wtf?? How can Google just bend over for government???! “Thank you kind sir, put “it” in.”
    • angrboda
      +1    
      freedom for capital ultimately allows that capital to “buy” the government. then you get tyranny, then you get popular discontent..then oppression..then revolution.

What is $1 a month to support one of the greatest publications on the Left?






 




America Is a Cabaret, Old Chum

Vhere are Your Troubles Now?

cabaretRed

by Randy Shields

Ladies und gentlemen, willkommen to the Kit Kat Klub in beautiful Los Angeles, California where even za hood has palm trees! As you know, three weeks ago it was windy for two straight days and last week it was overcast and sprinkled briefly but we’ve talked it out, we’ve recovered and we’re ready to party again! Don’t let the sports on the giant plasma screens or the live dancers distract you from this book review. Stop texting for a moment and let me pour you a Tony Montana, a line of Whole Fools gluten-free, organic, totally vegan, absolutely fair-traded Bolivian marching powder. Vhere are your troubles now?

I just finished reading Robert Gellately’s Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany. Published in 2001, the book’s central point, buttressed by diaries and newspaper accounts of the time, is that the German people knew exactly what the Nazis were doing and approved of it. Gellately makes clear that the Nazis were constantly calibrating what they could get away with with the German people and that, in the early years of the dictatorship anyway, dissent sometimes made a difference.

On many pages covering the early years of the dictatorship, one’s mind is constantly jumping back and forth between what the Nazis did and what’s been going on in America, not just since 9/11, but over the past 50 years. As Mark Twain said, history doesn’t repeat but it often rhymes.

Here’s a little stream of consciousness about the Nazis then and America now, inspired by Gellately’s book:

The Germans have the Reichstag fire, America has 9/11. In response, Hitler wraps up Germany with the Enabling Act and the all-purpose Reichstag Fire Decree. In America it’s the ready-made Patriot Act (the FBI wish list considered too reactionary to include in the plenty reactionary crime bills of 1994 and 1996), the Military Commissions Act and the National Defense (sic) Authorization Act. The police become more — to use Gellately’s words — “invasive, arbitrary and murderous.”

Flying down the autobahn or American highways, the signs of fascism are there but sometimes a blur: no left turns, selective terror, collective punishment, scapegoated minorities, the glorification of police and the military (film, television, sporting events.) The ruling class can’t compete intellectually for its collapsing social system so it resorts to the criminalization of dissent. The nation’s sacred founding texts must be abandoned. We’ve just had it confirmed, thanks to Edward Snowden, that the 3rd Amendment has been efficiently shit-canned along with the 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th as the NSA’s cerebral storm troopers are now “quartered” in our cell phones and computers.

“America, America show us the sign your children have waited to see…”

What’s that singing about — is it someone’s birthday? God, they look like Boy Scouts. OK, back to the book…

The Nazis don’t avoid the press but use it skillfully with photos of concentration camp inmates exercising and playing sports — think of embedded reporters and the “tropical paradise” with the “three square meals a day” that Gitmo’s defenders tell us about. The Nazis easily win over journalists — in the present, the most vicious critics of government whistleblowers are “journalists” like Jeffrey ToobinDavid Gregory and Bob Schieffer. Gellately: “The press greets Dachau as bringing new hope for the Dachau business world.” An “economic turning point,” Germany’s “most famous place,” exclaims one newspaper. American communities compete for prison construction. We need jobs, we need half the population spying on and guarding the other half. See how America “works”? If it takes millions of people locked up to preserve capitalism, so be it.

Doctors jump wholeheartedly into the Nazi’s torture, euthanasia and genocide and now we have American doctors, psychologists and anthropologists who have assisted torture and indefinite detention. We see people doing anything for a little more comfort, a little more advancement. Hitler had The Triumph of the Will, we have bootlicking propaganda like The Hurt LockerZero Dark Thirty and The Fifth Estate. Of course, staying silent in the face of atrocities is always popular. A little terror goes a long way.

We see Hitler and other Nazi leaders, at the pinnacle of a gigantic murderous enterprise, taking time from their busy days to reverse punishments from judges out in the hinterlands. A purse snatcher is given ten years in prison and it somehow comes to Hitler’s attention and he has the man shot. In America, Rumsfeld makes suggestions about torture techniques on “detainees” and Obama has his Star Chamber terror Tuesday. Obama brags to aides in a new book that’s he’s “really good at killing people.” What’s the sense of being in power if you can’t be powerful and exercise your abominables?

The Nazis constantly legalize their crimes — and citizens, abandoning all critical thinking, go along with whatever is the almighty “law.” “Anyone who wanted to resist,” says Gellately, “was in the difficult position of having to act illegally.” “Inequality before the law was justified in the name of the anti-Communist (me: anti-terrorist) crusade.” “The new regime shifted the scales of justice away from the rights of citizens in favor of the powers of the police…” And Himmler (or is it Feinstein, McCain or Lindsey Graham cracker?) says: “Good citizens have nothing to worry about.”

“The morning will come when the world is mine…”

God, I wish those assholes would sit down and shut up. They’re so rude!

In June of 1934 the German people accept the first mass murder of the dictatorship: not of Communists or “asocials” or Jews but the summary execution of 100 Storm Troopers who were “moving too fast” even for Hitler. Nobody protested. The German people often “lead” the Nazis, keeping the Gestapo and Kripo busy by informing on neighbors, business and romantic rivals and even relatives for jealousy, revenge or financial gain. If you see something, say something, says Homeland Security, a bureaucracy that didn’t exist 12 years ago but now has 230,000 employees and 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition — five hollow-point bullets for every American. Why so many? Maybe they plan on committing wholesale “puppycide” also.

One of the architects of the new Nazi system of “justice,” Dr. Werner Best, says no lawyers should be allowed in court as the usual “procedural forms of the judiciary were totally inapplicable for the struggle against the enemies of the state under the current circumstances.” (“9/11 changed everything!” It got us in touch with our inner Eichmanns!) Dr. Best again: “In its struggle against clever, determined and ruthless enemies… to destroy an enemy whose behavior cannot be predicted (me: those crazy Muslims) — the Gestapo also cannot be bound by the letter of the law.” Reichdefermentmeister Dick Cheney’s dark side soul mate!

“There exists no private sphere anymore,” says Reichminister Hans Frank. Or was that Reichminister Keith Alexander? J. Edgar Hoover sends agent Edmund Patrick Coffey to visit Kripo headquarters in January 1938 and Coffey expresses his “great pleasure” about the Kripo and the rest of the police. This, after years of widely known atrocities. Gellately: “A never-ending series of crime and punishment stories was published during the Nazi era.” Like Mutual of Dick Wolf’s Wild Law and Order Kingdoms which enthrall white viewers with tales of the scary dark-skinned Other?

Journalist William Shirer, on ordinary Germans who saw nothing wrong with the destruction of Poland: “As long as the Germans are successful and do not have to pull in their belts too much, this will not be an unpopular war.” (As long as American troops aren’t getting killed, as long as we’ve got flying killer robots slaughtering brown people and paid for by government money printing… Sure, why not?)

“Tomorrow belongs, tomorrow belongs, tomorrow belongs to me!”

Shut the fuck up and sit down! You aren’t anybody! Shit doesn’t belong to you! Jesus! Sorry about that. This place just isn’t what it used to be…Hell, let me stand up and sing a song:

Google is IG Farben as Facebook is Siemens as Yahoo is Daimler as Microsoft is Krupp as Apple is BMW and these fascist collaborators past and present are altogether — yeah!

Yeah, I know, I’m tuneless but that doesn’t interfere with my enjoyment of singing. And speaking of Google, executive chairquisling Eric Schmidt is shocked, shocked that spying is going on — spying that the government didn’t let him in on for once! But what he really hates is other nations attempting to protect themselves from the NSA, warning that these governments might ”balkanize” the internet. As for the NSA, Herr Schmidt won’t “pass judgment” on it — instead, it’s the resisters to the NSA and Stasicon Valley who are the problem. He co-wrote a book with a former advisor to Condoleezza Rice – ripped apart by Julian Assange – that’s been praised by more war criminals (Henry Kissinger, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Madeleine Albright and Michael Hayden) than you can shake a Nuremberg noose at.

Gellately on Nazi surveillance: “Barrington Moore has pointed out that the ‘one prerequisite’ for expressions of disobedience to take place is that there be ‘social and cultural space’ which ‘provides more or less protected enclaves within which dissatisfied or oppressed groups have some room’, so that they can meet and talk and mobilize for action.” The government infiltrated the Occupy movement months before its first event and completely routed it within six months. America’s “freedoms” are bullshit — whenever they are tested, they face swift and spectacular smack downs: union organizing, protesting at political conventions (in cages, out of sight of the conventions), reporting on and documenting cruelty to animals (ag-gag laws, the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act), being secure against unreasonable searches, having due process and adequate counsel, or freedom from cruel and unusual punishment (years in solitary confinement.) 75% of Americans want Medicare for all — and have for the last five decades — but despite us being so “free,” somehow, we can’t make that happen.

Back to the old-timey Nazis… Heydrich stresses the need to know the whereabouts of “the enemies of the state” in the event of war. The Gestapo begins arresting people in 1941 that they had listed on index cards from as far back as 1935 — nothing, of course, compared to the data storage center in Bluffdale, Utah. “Release of prisoners from protective custody will in general not take place during the war,” says one Nazi functionary, echoing the present day perpetrators of the never-ending war on/of terror. Both Hitler and Himmler “wanted to send anyone who committed three or four crimes to a concentration camp for good.” Four crimes — whoa, Hitler and Himmler were more lenient than 26 American states who lock people up and throw away the keys with three strikes laws! Be proud, America, you’re tougher than Nazis! Gellately: “The ‘community of the people’ and hence police considerations to protect it, took precedence over the rule of law and individual rights.” American fascism update: Blacks and Hispanics in NYC are not part of the “community of the people” so stop and frisk has been perfectly “legal.”

Also interesting are the contrasts between the Nazis and the American ruling class. At one point before the war, things are going so well for the Nazis that Hitler seriously considers disbanding the Gestapo. Is there any level of government in America that would entertain giving up any police power? Hitler also enacts numerous amnesties in the early years of the dictatorship with thousands of people released from incarceration. With the world’s greatest prison gulag, both in absolute numbers and percentage of the population, Barack Obama has pardoned a whopping 39 people in five years. Looking at many of their penny ante crimes, you might say it was “mighty white” of him. Meanwhile, Obama and the fascist edifice that he fronts won’t give the 74-year-old cancer-stricken Lynne Stewart a compassionate release because she dared to defy that edifice and so must be crushed, as Chelsea Manning must be crushed, as truth and justice must be crushed by the immutable moral “rightness” of money, that clinking clanking stinking skanking sound that makes the world go round, as codified in Citizens United and numerous other fascist-friendly Supreme Court decisions.

It might be protested: “We can’t have fascism in America — we don’t have any concentration camps or mass executions.” My answer: We have as many prisons and torturous “Control Units” as the ruling class needs. The ruling class doesn’t need mass executions because the “homeland” is thoroughly pacified and conquered. Instead, America’s obvious fascism is projected beyond its borders — it doesn’t have any borders, really — with 1,000 worldwide military installations, JSOC death squads operating in 75 nations, drones taking the place of armies (as we never really “withdraw”) and no appreciable domestic opposition to any of it. Explain to the parents of Pakistani children blown to bits by our drones or the detainees held for years in black sites without charge or trial that the American people don’t support fascism.

It might be protested: “But Hitler killed six million Jews and others!” Yes — and he was also responsible for 15-20 million civilian deaths in the Soviet Union. America’s leaders, however, spread out the corpses over decades: hundreds of thousands of Koreans, three million Southeast Asians, a million Iraqis, and millions more in proxy wars in Africa (six million alone in the Congo) and Latin America. “Good Americans” tell themselves — if they think of it at all — that the millions of innocents our government kills are “accidents,” “tragic mistakes,” “unavoidable,” and “collateral damage.” We don’t mean to kill millions of innocent people decade after decade — things just go wrong. Unless, of course, we’re playing the sanctions home game with Madeleine “The Price is Right” Albright and 500,000 dead Iraqi children — then we think it’s “worth it.”

It might be protested: “But there is no charismatic leader.” True — the quality of capitalism’s shills is very low and they are widely loathed. And that’s a good thing — witness what the ruling class gets away with when they have silver-tongued dissemblers like Clinton (NAFTA) and Obama (NDAA) working for them. (Here’s hoping, with Obama, that we’ve reached peak mystification.) But America hasn’t had its humiliation years like Weimar Germany — yet. Suppose we lose our reserve currency status, interest rates soar as does unemployment and tens of millions more Americans are out of work. (When Hitler came to power, 40% of Germans were out of work.) At that point some tough-talking confident pseudo-populist telling us that… oh, I don’t know… Canada and Panama are the cause of all our problems and he has a plan to regain our former “greatness” — well, that might be music to many ears.

It might be protested: “But we don’t have Hitler’s evil racist ideas.” (Set aside that he got most of them from the American eugenics movement.) My answer: we have enough of our own racist ideas to last us a good long while, we have 500 years of white hatred and violence toward people of color. The collective punishment of stop and frisk is one strand in an ever-spun web of fascism against blacks encompassing police brutality and summary executions, mass incarceration, racist sentencing disparities and applications of the death penalty (itself a tool of class terror), redlining, gentriciding (hey, it’s not just for Palestinians!), the CIA letting the Contras smuggle cocaine into major American cities in the 1980s and fueling a devastating epidemic (see Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance), the racist salvos from nearly every Scapegoater-in-Chief in my lifetime about “welfare queens,” “big bucks,” various Sister Soulja moments, “ethnic purity” and “black intrusion” (hardly anybody remembers peanut Carter’s multiple infractions) all the way up to Barack Go ‘Bama who, in one of his many magical speeches of misdirection (they’re always for white people), scolded black fathers on Father’s Day with his imaginary ideas about their real lives, and then we can take the way back machine to the infiltration and disruption of black leftist groups (the picked-on-first Communists in the Nazi analogy), culminating in the selective terror of targeted assassinations of their most powerful speakers and leaders. And all of the preceding happened just since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which was supposed to kickstart “equality.” And through it all, white America, the “good Americans” in this case, mostly wondered: “What’s the fucking problem? Slavery’s over.”

Godwin’s law says that whoever first brings up the Nazis to win an argument loses immediately. I like Godwin’s law but here’s another one that ought to be remembered: whoever brings up the Nazis last usually gets turned into a lampshade. Looking around the Kit Kat Klub, though, I think most of us made up our minds back in Chelsea that, when we go, we’re going like Elsie.

Randy Shields can be reached at music2hi4thehumanear@gmail.com.Read other articles by Randy, or visit Randy’s website.